6229 counter output inhibit

Greetings all,
I am trying to use my pci-6229 board and BNC-2090a for the following purpose.
I want to monitor analog votages on AI0-x while putting out a ttl signal at lets say 60Hz.
If an analog signal goes above a certian value I want to stop the counter ttl trigger, or possible
lower the rate, to maybe 10Hz.
The main concern is monitoring the voltages at the fastest update rate and being able to immediately turn off the
outgoing counter or change its rate. By changing the "# of Samples per Channel" the update rate seems to change, but I'm not sure
how to optimize this.
Any suggestions, I've searched the boards but am having some difficulties.
Thanks,
Jim
Message Edited by xband on 01-29-2008 03:26 PM
Attachments:
ReadBNC-2090a1.vi ‏26 KB

Ok, I have made an attempt at doing what I would like using a Pause Trigger, I can make my digital state go to high by putting >1V on AI0.
The counter rate does not change though.
I'm also not sure of how to "Clear" the counter task, whenever I wire to a "Clear Task" outside the loop, it gives an error.
Jim
Message Edited by xband on 01-29-2008 07:56 PM
Attachments:
ReadBNC-2090a Pause Trigger1.vi ‏52 KB

Similar Messages

PXI-6229 counter output

Hi,
I was using the DAQMx test panel for PXI-6229 module with my PXI-6229 card. I couldn't find an option of routing the counter pulse generation output to different PFIs. It is locked at PFI12 for ctr0 and PFI13 to ctr1. Is there some way by which I can route to other PFIs in the test panel or do I have to write code for it.
I want to route ctr0 output to PFI10 and route PFI12 as a counter input to measure frequency.
Please let me know
Thanks
Shiladitya

Shiladitya,
The Test panels are designed for functional testing only, and do not necessarily expose all capabilities of the device. In order to route these signals to custom PFI lines, you would need to write code. In LabVIEW, this would be done using a DAQmx Channel Property Node. Simply wire the intended terminal to the CO.Pulse.Term property.
Hope this helps,
Ryan Verret
Product Marketing Engineer
Signal Generators
National Instruments

Counter output PCI 6229

Hi all,
i have a little problem with NI pci 6229. I want generate a pulse train on both counter CTR 0 and CTR 1. I look the example that run on machine but i dont find the pin , with the oscilloscope, with y train pulse. I check the between Dgnd and PFI 8 ( pin2 ) but i dont see a train.
How can i solve ? What is the correct pin couter out on NI PCI 6229 ? it is referred to Dgnd?
tanks

Hi,
the terminal for a counter output task is PFI12 and not PFI8. The PFI 12 has the default Pin number 2.
NI PCI/PXI-6229
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/370466W-01/device_pinouts/6229_pinout/
Have a nice day.
Regards,
A.

Counter Output Pin on PCI-6229

I am using NI-DAQmx 7.3 C API with (among others) a PCI-6229.
I have used DAQmxSetCOPulseTerm() to connect a counter output to a terminal other than the default. It seems to work- the output pulses do, in fact, appear at PFI 6 (the terminal I'm using for testing). But the pulses continue to appear at the default output pin as well.
Is that expected?
In order to reverse the situation, I used DAQmxResetCOPulseTerm() just before calling DAQmxClearTask(). The function returns zero, but if I subsequently make a new task to do pulse output from the same counter, pulses appear at both PFI 6 and at the default pin.
Am I missing something?
John Weeks
WaveMetrics, Inc.
Phone (503) 620-3001
Fax (503) 620-6754
www.wavemetrics.com

Salvador Santolucito wrote:
Hi John,
I would suggest using the DAQmxTristateOutputTerminal. I have tried what you are doing in LabVIEW and I'm seeing the exact same results. When I set the default pin to tristate, the counter output does not show up on it.
-Sal
Thanks for trying it and confirming what I saw, and thanks for the pointer to DAQmxTristateOutputTerminal.
John Weeks
WaveMetrics, Inc.
Phone (503) 620-3001
Fax (503) 620-6754
www.wavemetrics.com

Counter Output/Counter Input PXI Signals Behaving Erratically

Question for all your LabVIEW guru's out there,
I am running a frequency loopback test using the NI PXI 6229 MIO DAQ card. I am generating a "Counter Output" pulse train signal which feeds through my device under test and then back out of my device under test and back into the PXI 6229 for a "Counter Input" frequency measurement. Both the "Counter Output" and the "Counter Input" are assigned different PFI lines using DAQmx in LabVIEW.
I have 4 lines to test on my DUT. All four lines run this same frequency measurement but with different PFI lines on the PXI 6229. Each line is test independently.
This is my setup for the 4 lines:
Path 1: P2.0 (Counter Output - Pulse Train) -> DUT (Device Under Test) -> P2.1 (Counter Input - Frequency Measurement)
Path 2: P2.2 (Counter Output - Pulse Train) -> DUT (Device Under Test) -> P2.3 (Counter Input - Frequency Measurement)
Path 3: P2.4 (Counter Output - Pulse Train) -> DUT (Device Under Test) -> P2.5 (Counter Input - Frequency Measurement)
Path 4: P2.6 (Counter Output - Pulse Train) -> DUT (Device Under Test) -> P2.7 (Counter Input - Frequency Measurement)
where:
P2.0 = PFI8
P2.1 = PFI9
P2.2 = PFI10
P2.3 = PFI11
P2.4 = PFI12
P2.5 = PFI13
P2.6 = PFI14
P2.7 = PFI15
I have a LabVIEW VI which generates the "Counter Output" and reads the "Counter Input" frequency. I am seeing weird behavior from the PXI 6229 card. I can test "Path 1" and "Path 2" and the frequency I read is what I generated. No issue there. However, when I test "Path 3" and "Path 4" the frequency measurement is erratic. The readings are two different frequencies repeated over and over again and none of those frequencies are the expected frequency which was generated out of the "Counter Output." If I reset the card, and start by testing "Path 3" and "Path 4" the frequency readings are correct and the erratic behavior is gone. However, when I try to then test "Path 2" and "Path 1" now those lines have the erratic frequency issue. I can continue resetting the card and see same issue. The PFI lines that I test first will always pass.
To summarize:
Steps Taken:
1. Test Path 1 = SUCCESS
2. Test Path 2 = SUCCESS
3. Test Path 3 = Erratic Frequency (Two Frequencies repeated over and over again in my frequency results array)
4. Test Path 4 = Erratic Frequency (Two Frequencies repeated over and over again in my frequency results array)
5. Reset the PXI 6229 Card
6. Test Path 3 = SUCCESS
7. Test Path 4 = SUCCESS
8. Test Path 3 = Erratic Frequency (Two Frequencies repeated over and over again in my frequency results array)
9. Test Path 4 = Erratic Frequency (Two Frequencies repeated over and over again in my frequency results array)
I am wondering if Port 2 (P2.0-P2.7) on the 6229 card has certain dependecies and this is why I am seeing issues. I am trying to get around this issue so that I don't have to always reset the card.
Are P2.0-P2.3 (PFI8-PFI11) and P2.4-P2.7 (PFI12-PFI15) treated differently or require different setup? How do I resolve this issue?
Thanks so much!

I have a theory...
The DAQ card follows a policy called "lazy uncommit" wherein the terminal used for the output will continue to be connected to the counter even after the task has completed (until the terminal is needed for something else). So as you run more tests, the counter output will end up driving more lines. This behavior should be easy enough to confirm.
As the DAQ card drives more lines, I'd imagine this affects the actual signal. You could scope it to check, but it sounds like either the rise/fall times are becoming longer or some extra noise is being introduced on the line.
The readings are two different frequencies repeated over and over again and none of those frequencies are the expected frequency which was generated out of the "Counter Output."
This implies you are picking up an extra edge during transitions--this isn't too uncommon if the signal is noisy since there is no built-in hysteresis on the DAQ card. I would expect the measured frequencies to have periods that sum to either the full period or the semi-period of your actual signal (depending on how many duplicate edges are detected).
Suggestions are as follows:
To stop the DAQ card from driving multiple PFI lines, it would probably be easiest to just programmatically reset the device in between your tests (using DAQmx Reset Device). If you can't reset the device (e.g. because you are running some other task that can't be interrupted) then you can instead configure a dummy task that uses the PFI line in question as an input.
To stop the DAQ card from picking up multiple edges during transitions, you should configure a digital filter on the input terminals. If you reset the device it sounds like this might not be necessary... it's up to you if you want to configure this or not.
Best Regards,
John Passiak

Can I generate pulse trains on more than one counter output at the same time?

I have a PCI 6601 card with a BNC 2121 to connect the signals to two devices. The card is used as a trigger for both devices and I want to be able to generate pulse trains on two output channels at the same time, with a time delay between the two. How do I do that in Labview 7.1 Development with DAQmx?

I feel foolish for not being able to figure this out, but it still doesn't work. Attached is the VI I use now. Counter 0 generates a finite pulse train and I programmed Counter 1 to generate a retriggerable single pulse triggered by CtrOinternaloutput. I still get the same error message: -50103 The specified resource is reserved. The operation could not be completed as specified.
The same happens if I set the trigger for counter 1 at PFI36 (default output of counter 0) or any other PFI line. If I try a pulse train generation on only one of the counters, both work fine.
If I try the example in traditional DAQ for multiple counter outputs with phase delay, it works fine.
Can you tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Attachments:
Shutter_AND_lamp_trigger.vi ‏103 KB

How to filter starttrigger on counter output precisely

HW PCI6602
Measurement studio 2008 (C#)NI-DAQmx 9.02I’m trying to trig a camera using the output from a counter.
The camera should be trigged when the counter input pulse width is larger than approx (filterPulseWidth 10us).To do this a have set up the following tasktask.COChannels.CreatePulseChannelTime(counter, "TriggerTaskChannel", COPulseTimeUnits.Seconds, COPulseIdleState.Low, 0, 80E-6, 0.007); task.Triggers.StartTrigger.Type = StartTriggerType.DigitalEdge; task.Triggers.StartTrigger.DigitalEdge.Edge = DigitalEdgeStartTriggerEdge.Rising; task.Triggers.StartTrigger.Retriggerable = true;task.Triggers.StartTrigger.DigitalEdge.DigitalFilterMinimumPulseWidth = filterPulseWidth; task.Triggers.StartTrigger.DigitalEdge.DigitalFilterEnable = true;Unfortunatly this filter has the following behaviour”If the period of the filter clock timebase is tfltrclk, this filter guarantees topass pulse widths that are 2*tfltrclk or longer and to block pulse widths thatare tfltrclk or shorter. A pulse with a width between these two ranges may ormay not pass, depending on the phase of the pulse with respect to the filterclock timebase”.It means that I have no sharp distinction on my filter as one would when applying a filter to an ordinary pulse width measuring task. Implementing this with via the software in a callback is to slow.The bottom line is that I would like to generate a pulse on my counter output when the trigger/counter input is greater than say 10us. The output pulse could be predetermind as in the sample code above or as long as the filtered input (I.e counter just pass filtered input to my output).How can this be done? BR
Jongas
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Jongas,
Is it OK if the trigger is sent once the pulse hits 10 us, rather than
on the exact falling edge? I'll assume the exact timing isn't as important, but you would like the trigger to occur very close to the falling edge (within a couple of us). The important thing is that we trigger as close as possible to when the PWM has hit 50% duty cycle.
Some brainstorming:
Digital Filtering on the 660x Isn't the Best for This:
Digital filtering might not be as practical here on your 6602 due to the region of uncertainty between 5 and 10 (or 10 and 20) us pulses. The TIO boards count two consecutive edges of a filter clock to determine when to pass a signal through so the guaranteed rejected pulse width is always half of your guaranteed passed pulse width (providing an external filter clock timebase that is synchronized with your external signal could potentially reduce this uncertainty but I honestly haven't tried this before and I would imagine it is not going to be very straightforward).
X Series Alternative:
Our X Series devices use a different method of digital filtering that would work better for you. If a hardware change is an option (and you can use PCIe) then you might consider this. You could use the 20 MHz timebase as your filter clock timebase and could guarantee to pass 10 us (200/20M) and reject 9.95 us (201/20M). The 6320 is currently our lowest cost X Series board. A couple of points about this solution:
1. To configure the PFI filter, you need to use some sort of dummy task to
access the property nodes. Here is an
example of this (although it is written in LabVIEW).
2. You can route the filtered PFI signal to be exported on another PFI line, but this will reserve Counter 3. This is documented in the Device Routes tab of Measurement and Automation Explorer.
3. The filtered output will be 9.95-10 us delayed from the input signal, so you could trigger the camera off of the rising edge of the filtered output directly and be fairly close to the actual falling edge.
External AND Gate Alternative:
You could configure a Counter Output to generate a re-triggerable pulse with a 10 us initial delay (to be triggered off of the rising edge of your PWM signal). Assuming the pulse is short enough to complete before the next period of your PWM signal, the counter output would only be high at the same time as the PWM signal if the signal was longer than 10 us. Use the external AND gate to combine these two signals and the result would be the trigger for your camera (the rising edge would correspond to 10 us after the PWM signal first goes high).
If you wanted to you could make the counter output pulse a little longer (say 8 us) and trigger the camera off of the falling edge out of the AND gate (a.k.a. rising edge out of a NAND gate) which would line up with the exact falling edge of the PWM signal. Don't make the CO pulse too long or it will overlap with the next period of the PWM.
Another Idea:
One idea that I keep coming back to is to use the internal rollover event of a counter input task (a pulse is generated whenever a counter rolls over on its Internal Output which can be routed to a PFI line). I don't think this will work, but the idea in theory would be to:
1. Set Default state to known value (e.g. 2^32-200).
2. Gate the Counter so it only counts during the time PWM is high. Have it count the 20 MHz timebase.
3. Reset the Counter to default state on the falling edge of the PWM signal.
4. The counter would rollover if 200 pulses occurred of the 20 MHz timebase (10 us), and the Counter Output could be routed to a PFI line to trigger the camera.
The problem is that there is no good way to reset the counter except for an encoder measurement (Kevin has already made a nice suggestion about this). A Pulse Width Measurement would technically reset the counter, but you cannot currently set the default value of a Pulse Width Measurement task so there is no way to make the rollover happen prematurely).
Configuring an encoder measurement and working with the multiple counters on the 6602 to produce appropriate A,B, and Z signals might be a method to look into further, but at this point I think you'd be better off with an external AND gate.
I don't want to say it's impossible with just the 6602, but I can't think of a straightforward way to go about it without external hardware (although maybe I can sleep on it and think of something later... how many counters do you have to work with?).
With your current NI Hardware, I think your best bet is to go with an external AND gate. If you're planning on purchasing an X Series card the digital filtering idea is actually not a bad way to go.
I hope this is helpful!
Best Regards,
John Passiak

How to Immediately Change Counter Output Rate?

I have a piece of code that largely works like this example: http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/epd/p/id/5493
In other words, I set up the Counter Output with some initial frequency and duty cycle, but then during the main loop of my program I continuously change the frequency to a new value based on other criteria.
I'm using an M-series PXI card and LabVIEW RT.
The problem I'm having is that the card waits for the next edge before changing the counter output rate. For instance, lets say it is going at a low frequency and I am upping to a high frequency. If the command arrives in the middle of the current pulse, it will wait to complete the low-rate pulse before starting the high frequency output. Is there a way to make it interrupt the current count and immediately start counting at the new rate?
Thanks,
Isaac

Hi Isaac,
I posted the code in LV 8.2 so you should be able to open it now (it sometimes takes several minutes to upload).
There are a few limitations to using the digital lines instead of the counters:
1. The digital lines are updated off of a sample clock which will be much slower than a timebase. For example, on the 6221 the maximum update rate is 1 MHz, while the counter output has a max timebase of 80 MHz. As a result, the number of frequencies you can generate are going to be more restricted (divide down from 1 MHz vs. 80 MHz).
2. On M series devices, the digital lines must be clocked from an external source. This could be generated from a counter
3. You have to build the digital waveform, which is a bit tricky (I think the example code should help out with that but I haven't had time to thoroughly test it).
4. If you are generating digital lines at fast rates, you will need to write quite a few samples at a time to the output buffer to ensure the data does not underflow. If the buffer includes multiple periods of the digital signal, you would have the case that using the counter output would still update more immediately.
Again, to determine the best course of action it would be useful to know what frequencies you want to generate and which exact hardware you are using. I just mentioned the digital lines as an alternative to the counters, but it might not be ideal for your situation.
-John
John Passiak

How to disable (turn off) a counter output

I have a similar question up on the the board but I thought I would ask it in another way to make it simple and straightforward.
Can an E-series counter output be disabled (and enabled) quickly through some software command? When I say " disabled" I mean switched off to a TTL low state. I have tried both the "disable" counter control command and gating the counter with a TTL signal. Both methods leave the output pin in whatever state the output happens to be in at the time of the command or gating. I need a disable function where "disabled" automatically sets an OFF or LOW on the output. I am using this to generate a pulse train where the pulse train switches off at certain times, and I cannot have the output remain high at these times.
I am using traditional DAQ but if there is a method in DAQmx that works I'd be willing to try it...

Have you tried using the following vi with a reset command (search in help, it works with the E series counters)
Counter Control
This VI controls groups of counters. Control operations include starting, stopping, and setting the state of active acquisitions. This VI works with DAQ-STC and NI-TIO-based devices.
Control code 1 (reset) reinitializes the counter back to the default settings.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It’s the questions that drive us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Variable frequency counter output

I found this example of how to vary the frequency of a counter output, but it appears this is not supported and i receive the following error. Can anyone tell me if there is an alternative method at all? my device is a usb6341 which has 4 COs
thanks
Attachments:
Capture.JPG ‏118 KB

If you found that code in an NI-provided example, it's probably more likely that the operation is not supported by your specific hardware.
What is the range of frequencies you want to create?
How accurate does the clock need to be?
How often will the frequency be changing?
Can the hardware receiving the clock tolerate and "discontinuities" in the pulse train?
You could momentarily stop the clock, change the setting and then restart it.
MIke...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

Display counter output on graph

I have two counters generating continuous digial pulse trains from my PCI 6010, and I'm trying to display the output on a graph. I've got the output of one counter connected to an AI line that leads to a waveform graph, but I can't get anything on the graph. I've measured the output via external means, so I know the counters are generating the appropriate pulses.
Eventually I'd like to have some sort of indicator for each counter that indicates whether the counter is in the 'on' or 'off' state, but I figured getting the counter outputs to diplay on a graph would be a good first step.
My VI is below; the display part that isn't working is at the bottom of the case structure.
Thanks.

Once your code goes into the inner while loop your graph will never be updated since it will only execute one time. In order to update the graph continually you will need a parallel which handles the graph updates. A good way to pass data between the parallel tasks is a queue.
Mark Yedinak
"Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald - Gordon Lightfoot

Please help with C code to synchronize counter output to analog input

Hi All,
I am using NI DAQ USB-6353 with text-based C code to control it. I would like to send a continuous pulse train from the DAQ to pulse a power supply, which then activates an electron beam producing current to be read by the analog input port of the same DAQ. I would like to keep only the analog samples during the pulse peak and samples of a couple pulse widths right after. I am successfully to generate a pulse train using the sampled clock from a counter output channel, but fail to use the same clock to synchronize the pulse train with the analog input. DAQmxReadAnalogF64 is not called by the static function EveryNCallback set for the analog input task. Am I doing something wrong with the following codes? It would be great if it turns out only I am using the wrong sampled clock name of the counter ("dev1/PFI8") for the analog input. Or is something more fundamental that a counter cannot be sync. with an analog input?
Would someone be able to send me a link to an example in C or C++ or visual basic showing how to synchronize a buffered sample clocked digital pulse train from a counter output channel to an analog input? To simplify the post, the below codes do not include the static functions EveryNCallback and DoneCallBack, but I can send them if needed.
Many thanks in advance for your help,
Thuc Bui
//setting operation parameters
double initDelay = 0.0, freq = 10;
double dutyCycle = 0.0001;           //thus pulse width is 10 microsec
unsigned highTicks = 4;   //per period
unsigned numSamplesPerPeriod = highTicks / dutyCycle; //40000 samples/period
unsigned lowTicks = numSamplesPerPeriod - highTicks;      //per period
unsigned sampleRate = 2*numSamplesPerPeriod*freq;       //800000 samples/s
//create counter
TaskHandle counterTask;
int errCode = DAQmxCreateTask("", & counterTask);
errCode = DAQmxCreateCOPulseChanFreq(counterTask, "dev1/ctr0", "",
                                 DAQmx_Val_Hz, DAQmx_Val_Low,
                                 initDelay, freq, dutyCycle);
errCode = DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(counterTask, "dev1/PFI8", sampleRate, DAQmx_Val_Rising,
                           DAQmx_Val_ContSamp, numSamplesPerPeriod);
//create analog input
TaskHandle aiTask;
double minVolt = 0.0, maxVolt = 1.0;
errCode = DAQmxCreateAIVoltageChan(aiTask, "dev1/ai0", "", DAQmx_Val_Diff,
                                 minVolt, maxVolt, DAQmx_Val_Volts, "");
unsigned bufferSize = 10* numSamplesPerPeriod;
errCode = DAQmxSetBufInputBufSize(aiTask, bufferSize);
errCode = DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(aiTask, "dev1/PFI8", sampleRate, DAQmx_Val_Rising, DAQmx_Val_ContSamp, numSamplesPerPeriod);
errCode = DAQmxRegisterEveryNSamplesEvent(aiTask, DAQmx_Val_Acquired_Into_Buffer,
                                        numSamplesPerPeriod, 0, EveryNCallback, 0);
errCode = DAQmxRegisterDoneEvent(aiTask, 0, DoneCallBack, 0)
//start aiTask first
errCode = DAQmxStartTask(aiTask);
//then counterTask
errCode = DAQmxStartTask(counterTask);

Hi Xavier,
Thank you very much for getting back to me. I really appreciate it. I followed your advice with the option 2 and simplified my code by using one of the NI C example templates to generate the below codes (also attached). I was able to see the pulses generated with an oscilloscope, and on the same oscilloscope I could see the ouput pulses of the electron beam probe. Unfortunately, the below code via DAQmxReadAnalogF64 reports of no data read from the probe and finally times out. Below is the error message given by this function. I did check the connection of the analog input wires to make sure they were connected to pin 1 (A0+) and 2 (A0-) because I was using the terminal configuration DAQmx_Val_Diff. Do you see any obvious errors I have made in my codes?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Thuc Bui
Task started, waiting for trigger...
Acquired 0 analog samples DAQmx Error: Some or all of the samples requested have not yet been acquired.
To wait for the samples to become available use a longer read timeout or read later in your program. To make the samples available sooner, increase the sample rate. If your task uses a start trigger, make sure that your start trigger is configured correctly. It is also possible that you configured the task for external timing, and no clock was supplied. If this is the case, supply an external clock.
Property: DAQmx_Read_RelativeTo
Corresponding Value: DAQmx_Val_CurrReadPos
Property: DAQmx_Read_Offset
Corresponding Value: 0
Task Name: _unnamedTask<1>
Status Code: -200284
End of program, press Enter key to quit
********************** C Code **************************************************
#include <stdio.h>
#include "NIDAQmx.h"
#include <math.h>
#define DAQmxErrChk(functionCall) { if( DAQmxFailed(error=(functionCall)) ) { goto Error; } }
int main(void) {
int32 error = 0;
char errBuff[2048]={'\0'};
TaskHandle taskHandleDig=0;
TaskHandle taskHandleAna=0;
double  timeout=10;
double minVol = -1.0, maxVol = 1.0;
double initDelay = 0.0;
double freq = 10.0;
double pulseWidth = 1.0e-5; //10us
double dutyCycle = pulseWidth * freq;
unsigned hiTicks = 4;
double sampleRate = hiTicks/pulseWidth; //samples/s
unsigned lowTicks = ceil(sampleRate/freq) - hiTicks;
unsigned nSpPeriod = hiTicks + lowTicks;
unsigned numPulses = 1;
unsigned nSpCh = numPulses*nSpPeriod;
double sampleRate2 = ceil(2.0*sampleRate);
unsigned sampleMode = DAQmx_Val_FiniteSamps;
/*********************************************/ /*/ DAQmx Configure Code /*********************************************/
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCreateTask("", &taskHandleDig)); DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCreateTask("", &taskHandleAna));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCreateAIVoltageChan(taskHandleAna, "Dev2/ai0", "", DAQmx_Val_Diff, minVol, maxVol, DAQmx_Val_Volts, ""));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(taskHandleAna, "/Dev2/Ctr0InternalOutput", sampleRate2, DAQmx_Val_Rising, sampleMode, nSpCh));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCreateCOPulseChanFreq(taskHandleDig, "Dev2/ctr0", "", DAQmx_Val_Hz, DAQmx_Val_Low, initDelay, freq, dutyCycle));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(taskHandleDig, "/Dev2/PFI12", sampleRate2, DAQmx_Val_Rising, sampleMode, nSpCh));
unsigned bufferSize = nSpCh;
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxSetBufInputBufSize(taskHandleAna, bufferSize));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxSetBufOutputBufSize(taskHandleDig, bufferSize));
/*********************************************/ /*/ DAQmx Write Code /*********************************************/
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxWriteCtrTicksScalar(taskHandleDig, 0, timeout, hiTicks, lowTicks, NULL));
/*********************************************/ /*/ DAQmx Start Code /*********************************************/
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxStartTask(taskHandleAna)); DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxStartTask(taskHandleDig));
printf("Task started, waiting for trigger...\n");
/*********************************************/ /*/ DAQmx Read Code /*********************************************/
double* dataAna = new double[nSpCh];
int32 numReadAna = 0;
int errCode = DAQmxReadAnalogF64(taskHandleAna, -1, timeout, DAQmx_Val_GroupByChannel, dataAna, nSpCh, &numReadAna, NULL);
printf("Acquired %d analog samples\n",numReadAna);
if (numReadAna) {
    unsigned nPts = (numReadAna < hiTicks)? numReadAna : hiTicks;
   for (unsigned n = 0; n < nPts; ++n) {
         printf("%6.3f ", dataAna[n]);
    printf("\n");
delete [] dataAna;
DAQmxErrChk(errCode);
Error:
if( DAQmxFailed(error) )   DAQmxGetExtendedErrorInfo(errBuff,2048);
if( taskHandleDig!=0 && taskHandleAna!=0 ) {
/*********************************************/   /*/ DAQmx Stop Code   /*********************************************/
    DAQmxStopTask(taskHandleDig);
    DAQmxClearTask(taskHandleDig);
    DAQmxStopTask(taskHandleAna);
    DAQmxClearTask(taskHandleAna);
if( DAQmxFailed(error) )   printf("DAQmx Error: %s\n",errBuff);
printf("End of program, press Enter key to quit\n");
getchar();
return 0;
Attachments:
Correlated DIO AI_Sample_Clock Dig Start.c ‏6 KB

"loopback" counter output without wiring

Cross posted from another forum for more visibility:
Basically, I have a counter output being generated on a trigger line. It's just a pulse at defined intervals of 1 hz. The problem is, the card that is generating the output needs the trigger itself, but if it is using the trigger line to output the trigger itself, it can't read it. I know I can get around this with a timing and synch card, and possibly with external wiring, but is there any way to do this all in the backplane?
In summary, can I have a AO card generating a counter output on a trigger line use that output as a trigger for itself in some way, without extra wiring or a 6672 card?
CLA, LabVIEW Versions 2010-2013

Jeff·Þ·Bohrer wrote:
Greg,
What are you really triing to do? your post is a bit more cryptic than usual.
My instinct says "a single board RIO" would do the trick. but, that's a lot of capability to throw at a simple PFIO line. What did you get yourself into this time?
NO NO NO. No sbRIO. Did NI pay you to help market now?!
All I want to do is have a digital pulse, which I can use as a start trigger for ALL my AI and AO. Some tasks stop and restart while others keep running continuously. When the select tasks restart, they need to sync back up with the continuously running tasks, and they do so by using this start trigger again. This is not a clock sync, think of it like a "wait until next ms multiple." I resolve this by having a digital pulse happening every "x millseconds" which I use as my start trigger. If a task restarts, it will again wait for this pulse.
The problem is, if I am generating this trigger on PXI1Slot12/PXI_trig0, I cannot also trigger off of this trigger line in slot 12.
CLA, LabVIEW Versions 2010-2013

How to use counter output pulses to trigger analog input?

Hello all,
I hope the kind people using this forum can help me, a lowly beginner LV programmer! I have been attempting to create a VI that produces a user defined number of TTL pulses, separated by every n seconds. Each TTL would be outputted to a stimulator, which in turn generates its own TTL. Using the stimulator-generated TTL, I would like to trigger finite analog data acquisition (e.g. for every TTL, trigger the collection of a data sweep that contains 4000 samples (collected at 4000 Hz), with 1000 samples collected pre-trigger. I would like to also be able to see each data sweep as it is triggered on a chart. As I understand things (lots of online/book/forum reading), I should be using the counter output to generate my TTL pulses, and syncing each counter produced TTL with analog input, as well as using a reference trigger. Also, the AI part should be started first, so that I don' t miss any counter outputs. If it matters, I also need to use one of the AI channels to acquire the TTL, so I can see my stimulator-induced responses to the stimulator in time.
I am able to generate the TTL pulses from the counter output, but I am having a problem with the AI part. I am unsure how to sync the counter output with AI. Also, since I need to acquire pre-trigger samples, I would be needing to acquire samples continuously, but when I set 'continuous samples' on daqmx timing, the VI doesn't work (hence why's its set to 'finite samples').
I hope someone out there can help, as I have been at this for what seems ages, with limited success. I am using a USB-6259 and LabView v8.2. Thanks!
Attachments:
RC001 v_1.vi ‏49 KB

Hello,
Due to the fact that analog tasks themselves are not retriggerable, a
pulse train produced by a counter is always used as the sample clock
for the analog input task in order to recreate a retriggerable effect
for analog input. This can be done by creating a finite pulse train set
to retriggerable using the DAQmx Trigger Property Node, or the pulse
train could be continuous and just be gated by another signal. Neither
of these methods can be properly applied in hardware to create a
retriggerable reference trigger. You can however implement something
similar in software by just stopping and restarting your reference
triggered analog input task within a loop. There will be some delay
between when the task is stopped and restarted, as these events require
software intervention, but if there is enough time between when each
trigger signal is generated, there should not be any noticeable delay
or missed samples.
I have attached an example of this!
Mark B
===If this fixes your problem, mark as solution!===
Attachments:
RC001 v_1mod.vi ‏25 KB

Setting the counter output mastertimebase divider?

Hello
I want to output single short pulses with varying pauses. My MuFu DAQ card has 20 MHz master clock rate and 24 bit counter (Good ol'6052E). When I try to output 1 µs with a pause duration of more than 839 ms, I get an error due to mismatch of clockrate and counter bit size with short and long duration. This is explained in great detail in the corresponding help:
2/ counter clock rate <= X <= 2^24 / counter clock rate. with counter clock rate = master clock rate / divider
0.1 µs <= X <= 16777215 / 20Mhz = 839 ms
I could strech my limits by manually setting the CO.CounterTimebaseMasterTimebaseDivider to 10. But I've searched all property nodes I could find but I have not found this property.
Does anyone know where it is hidden, and to which values it can be set?
Thank you
Michael

Hi Michael,
Unfortunately that property doesn't exist. There are a few "Divisor" properties available for other subsystems (e.g. see Analog Input timing block diagram below).
However, you'll notice in the above diagram that the valid divisors of the master timebase are only 1 or 200 (which then gives the AI Sample Clock Timebase). You can get similar behavior on the counter by specifying to use the 20 MHz timebase or 100 kHz timebase for your source. However, using the 100 kHz (1/10 us) timebase is going to prevent you from properly generating the narrow 1 us pulses that you require.
So, you can use 20 MHz or 100 kHz without any additional resources, but 100 kHz wouldn't allow you to have a 1 us pulse, and 20 MHz won't let you have a high or low time of greater than ~839 ms. You could generate frequencies in between these to use as the counter timebase (either use the frequency output or use the second counter to generate the desired frequency, or perhaps configure a dummy analog task) but of course there would always be a tradeoff between the resolution of the pulse and the maximum time between pulses.
If you do have the 2nd counter available, here is my suggestion to get the best of both worlds:
1. Configure a counter output to generate a pulse every N seconds (I suggest configuring the output to generate at 1/N frequency at 50% duty cycle). When you configure this counter, DAQmx will choose an appropriate timebase for you. When N is less than ~1.67 seconds, DAQmx will use the 20 MHz timebase (since both the high and low time would be under the 839 ms). When N is > 1.67 seconds but below ~335 seconds, DAQmx will use the 100 kHz timebase. If you intend on modifying the rate of the output (to something above 1.67 seconds) after the task has started you would need to make sure to specify to use the 100 kHz timebase rather than relying on the DAQmx default. You can't use a built-in timebase if you want to generate a delay greater than 335 seconds, but if you wanted to you could handle this case by checking for it and configuring the frequency output to generate an even lower timebase.
2. To generate the actual output signal, configure a retriggerable single pulse generation to be triggered off of the signal generated above. This signal will be based off of the 20 MHz timebase (assuming you configure a pulse width less than ~839 ms) and so will give you a good resolution on the available pulse widths that you can generate.
In summary, doing this would let you decouple the resolution of your generated pulse width from the resolution of the delay between the pulses. The downside is that it uses two counters.
The other option which I previously mentioned (and what you were asking about) would be to find a timebase that meets the two requirements: 1) fast enough to generate a narrow pulse and 2) slow enough to not roll-over between pulses. You have 100 kHz and 20 MHz available to you, but you can generate intermediate frequencies using the frequency output. If you plan on using a counter to generate the timebase instead, you should consider the other option which decouples the two counters.
Of course, using a device with a higher counter resolution (most newer DAQ devices use 32-bit counters) would probably also resolve your issue depending on the full range of delays that you need. The downside here is the cost of new hardware.
Best Regards,
John Passiak

6229 counter output inhibit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for