7925G - Registering to CUCM issue

Hi all,
I am trying to configure a new 7925G phone. The phone uses a certificate for authetication to the AP.
Regarding the connection is ok as I can access the phone acress the Network.
When I create the phone into the CUCM, it seems that the phone is registered as per the status:
Registration Registered with Cisco Unified Communications Manager 10.x.x.x
The issue is that the registration step turns with no stop on the phone, and I found the following error in the log file:
2012-09-18 10:51:08:0460 HERMIT user.info modprobe: insmod -s -k eth0
2012-09-18 10:51:10:0270 HERMIT user.err SCCP: Skinny_get_tftpIp: Could NOT getGNetutilVarVal!
2012-09-18 10:51:10:0270 HERMIT user.err SCCP: Skinny_get_alt_tftpIp: Could NOT getGNetutilVarVal!
Any idea to fix it ?
Please find the log file in attachment.
Thanks
TS

Similar Messages

Percentage of Phones won't register after CUCM 9.1.2 Sub and TFTP failover

Hoping this has happened to someone else and they can shed some light on the subject. I have a CUCM 9.1.2 cluster running, pub, 2 subs, and 2 tftp servers. At the moment it's a small deployment so I have all phones registered to sub 01 as primary and using tftp01 as the primary tftp server. In order to have some VMWare maintenance done I recently shut down the pub, primary sub and primary tftp server forcing the phones to use the other half of the cluster. Everything there worked as expected, phones failed over, etc. The problem occurred after the VMWare maintenance was done. At that point I brought up the Pub and the primary sub (maintenance wasn't yet completed on the host that contained the primary tftp server). After the primary sub was up and back online is where the problem started. Random phones (all 8945 SIP that are all running the same firmware version SIP8941_8945.9-3-2-12) would just not register. Some of them would show registered in CUCM, however they were non-functional as DNs weren't displayed, no dial tone, etc. Others would just not register all together. In order to get a phone to register I had to perform a factory reset on the physical phone, if I did that they came back with no problem. Later after the maintenance was completed on the host that contained the primary tftp server and I brought that back online, I still had issues with phones however just a power cycle was enough to get those phones registered. I opened a TAC case one this but it ended up at packet captures and at that point ever phone I reset would just register correctly so I could never get an example of a phone that wouldn't register.
I'm convinced it's certificate related and having to do with the trust list, which is why I believe the factory reset on the phone would allow the phone to correctly register. There just doesn't seem to be any clear indication as to why it would be certificate related. Names weren't changed on any of the UC servers, VMWare version was upgraded from 5.0 to 5.1 but I can't see how that would have caused certificate issues.
Any help would be grateful or if this has also happened to anyone I'd love to hear what you did to resolve this as for future maintenance windows I have to be confident that phones will be able to fail over between cluster nodes.
Thank you,
Alex

So the phone is unable to authenticate the ITL it is getting or the new config file. This could mean that the ITL is corrupt on one of the nodes or that TVS isn't working properly.
I would try running "show itl" on each node and check the bottom of the output to see if the ITL is verified successfully.
I would also make sure TVS is running on all nodes okay.
You also should be able to just delete the ITL from the affected phones rather than doing a full factory reset in case this comes up again.

Telepresence Conductor OBTP scheduled conferences and TC endpoints registered to CUCM

Dear community,
I am experiencing an interesting issue with TP Conductor based OBTP scheduled conferences and the behavior of TC software based endpoints natively registered to CUCM.
Software versions:
- TelePresence Conductor XC2.2.1
- CUCM 9.1.2
- TMS 14.3.2
- TC 7.0.2
Scheduled conferences are configured as OBTP and the Conductor is the preffered MCU in routing.
Behind the Conductor is a TelePresence Server 7010 appliance.
The Conductor Alias Pattern is 805%, priority 100, is immersive is not checked, the generated regular expression is (805[^@]*).*
Numeric ID Base for the alias is 10, Numeric ID Step is 1, Numeric ID Quantity is 9.
When scheduling conferences with TMS, TMS is generating numbers in this sequence:
80510, 80511, 80512, etc.
In CUCM, the Conductor IP alias for rendezvous is a destination of a SIP trunk, and there is a
route pattern 8051X
pointing to it.
The conference alias in Conductor is
(805[^@]*).*
With OBTP and CTS software based endpoints everything works well, these 8051X numbers are pushed to the MIDlets of the IP Phone or Touch 12" and the endpoints connect to the telepresence server scheduled conference.
With the TC software based endpoints, when selecting Join now on the conference reminder pop up screen with the remote control, the endpoint is dialing both:
80510@<CUCM-IP-Address> and
[email protected]
where example.com is the CUCM cluster domain.
The TC endpoint then somehow automatically connects with two sessions to the telepresence server which is extremely awkward.
When pushing the red disconnect button on the remote control, I have an option to disconnect all calls, or disconnect the first or second call to the same dialed alias 80510@<CUCM-IP-Address>. If I disconnect one of the calls everything is OK.
But then, how come the TC based endpoint initates two calls in parallel to the Conductor and then Telepresence Server ?
Has anybody experienced a similar issue ?
If I manually dial 80510 everything is fine, the endpoint dials
80510@<CUCM-IP-Address> and it connects successfully.

Hello Patrick,
Thank you very much for the input.
I also have the
log ctx SIPStack debug 9
from the endpoint when initiating the call. I can provide it to you privately.
Did not have enough time to get the traces from CUCM but will also check them.
If we are really hitting a bug, I will have to quickly do a workaround removing the Conductor from scheduling and trying directly with the TelePresence Server.
Mihail

Cisco 7821 IP Phone not registered in CUCM 9.1.2

Dear all,
We have CUCM 9.1.2.11900-12 and we have uploaded this device package: cmterm-devicepack9.1.2.12028-1.cop.sgn and reboot cluster
But the Cisco 7821 IP phone not registered in CUCM
can some one advise me?
Thanks and best regards,
Tan

Hi
Can you please share the output for show version active from CUCM.
Please check the following thread as well:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12030206/adding-7800-phones-cucm-8691

VG224 MGCP can´t register to CUCM 8.6.2-20000-2

I have tried to register cisco VG224 to CUCM 8.6 like MGCP gateway but it fail to register, any idea why this issue?

Yes I have configure the FQDN of the gateway in CUCM.
Debug logs Are:
VGALP01(config)#
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_sys_msg(208):[lvl=0]MGCP sys msg: (EXTERNAL_EVENT)
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xlate_mgcp_sys_ev(69):[lvl=0]xlate sys msg: (EXTERNAL_EVENT, 63FE0988)
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_sys_msg(217):[lvl=0]sys msg values: (INVALID MGCP EVENT, 0, , 3647, CALL_IDLE)
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_handle_cmapp_event(442):[lvl=0]process
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_get_by_ifn(1330):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_get_tree_link_by_ifn(1149):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_compute_key(198):[lvl=0]type -1 slot FFFFFFFF subunit 0000
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_get_tree_link_by_ifn(1161):[lvl=0]computed key 0xF0000000
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_cmapp_send_rsip(407):[lvl=1]Send-RSIP: Sending gw host is VGALP01.volcan.com, endpt is *
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_root_get_profile(1905):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_send_rsip_msg(737):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_packet(864):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_estimate_msg_buf_length(496):[lvl=1]328 bytes needed for header
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_estimate_msg_buf_length(785):[lvl=1]344 bytes needed after checking parameter lines
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_estimate_msg_buf_length(808):[lvl=1]344 bytes needed after cheking SDP lines
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_parameter_lines(9499):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_val_mandatory_parms(13005):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_restart_method(12063):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_restart_method(12085):[lvl=0]SUCCESS: Building Restart Method (RM:) OK
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_parameter_lines(9802):[lvl=0]SUCCESS: Building MGCP Parameter lines is OK
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_packet(1018):[lvl=1]SUCCESS: MGCP message building OK - END of building
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/MGCP_NEDB_get_next_addr(1211):[lvl=1]
NOTIFY ENTITY = 10.24.130.11
next->10.24.130.11
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: MGCP Packet sent to 10.24.130.11:2427--->
RSIP 957884407 *@VGALP01.volcan.com MGCP 0.1
RM: restart
<---
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_endpt_record_rsip(615):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_send_rsip_msg(882):[lvl=1]Manually recroding RSIP method
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_endpt_record_rsip(615):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_enq_retx_rsip_msg(396):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_add_trans_id_rec(1137):[lvl=1]Add trans id (957884407, 646D36B8) record
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_stw_timer_start(393):[lvl=0]timer type 0, duration 500
*Mar 1 01:59:49.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_stw_timer_start(393):[lvl=0]timer type 15, duration 20000
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_count_active_mgc_msg_stat(239):[lvl=1]MGC stat - 10.24.130.11, total=47, succ=0, failed=46
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: MGCP Packet received from 10.24.130.11:2427--->
500 957884407
<---
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_mgcp_msg(3536):[lvl=0] :
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_parse_packet(312):[lvl=0]call mgcp_parse_header
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_parse_packet(316):[lvl=0]out mgcp_parse_header
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_parse_packet(326):[lvl=1]SUCCESS: - MGCP Header parsing was OK
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_parse_packet(344):[lvl=2]SUCCESS: - END of Parsing
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_msg_ack(6687):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_count_active_mgc_msg_stat(239):[lvl=1]MGC stat - 10.24.130.11, total=47, succ=0, failed=47
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_mp_get_not_entity(830):[lvl=2]Invalid parameter (pkt 0x640982F8 pkt->mgcp_parm_lines 0x00000000)
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_check_for_redirection(6548):[lvl=1]endpt * was not redirected
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_msg_ack(6759):[lvl=1]Removing msg : RSIP 957884407 *@VGALP01.demo.com MGCP 0.1
RM: restart
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_msg_ack(6831):[lvl=0] Received ACK for RSIP, setting the restart method to NONE
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_check_and_send_pending_rsip(2116):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.935: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_check_endpt_ext_and_free_rsip_info(3320):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 01:59:49.939: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_socket(3647):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_sys_msg(208):[lvl=0]MGCP sys msg: (EXTERNAL_EVENT)
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xlate_mgcp_sys_ev(69):[lvl=0]xlate sys msg: (EXTERNAL_EVENT, 63FE099C)
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcpapp_process_sys_msg(217):[lvl=0]sys msg values: (INVALID MGCP EVENT, 0, , 3647, CALL_IDLE)
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_handle_cmapp_event(442):[lvl=0]process
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_get_by_ifn(1330):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_get_tree_link_by_ifn(1149):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_compute_key(198):[lvl=0]type -1 slot FFFFFFFF subunit 0000
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/xgcp_endpt_get_tree_link_by_ifn(1161):[lvl=0]computed key 0xF0000000
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_cmapp_send_rsip(407):[lvl=1]Send-RSIP: Sending gw host is VGALP01.volcan.com, endpt is *
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_root_get_profile(1905):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_send_rsip_msg(737):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_packet(864):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_estimate_msg_buf_length(496):[lvl=1]328 bytes needed for header
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_estimate_msg_buf_length(785):[lvl=1]344 bytes needed after checking parameter lines
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_estimate_msg_buf_length(808):[lvl=1]344 bytes needed after cheking SDP lines
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_parameter_lines(9499):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 02:00:19.927: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_val_mandatory_parms(13005):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 02:00:19.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_restart_method(12063):[lvl=0]Entered
*Mar 1 02:00:19.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_restart_method(12085):[lvl=0]SUCCESS: Building Restart Method (RM:) OK
*Mar 1 02:00:19.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_parameter_lines(9802):[lvl=0]SUCCESS: Building MGCP Parameter lines is OK
*Mar 1 02:00:19.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/mgcp_build_packet(1018):[lvl=1]SUCCESS: MGCP message building OK - END of building
*Mar 1 02:00:19.931: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/MGCP/MGCP_NEDB_get_next_addr(1211):[lvl=1]
NOTIFY ENTITY = 10.24.130.11
next->10.24.130.11
*Mar 1 02:00:19.931: MGCP Packet sent to 10.24.130.11:2427--->
RSIP 957884409 *@VGALP01.demo.com MGCP 0.1
RM: restart
<---

Cisco Jabber for Mac 9.2.1: slow to register with CUCM

Hi,
We have this specific problem on our Jabber for Mac 9.2.1 client only: the client takes 60 to 70 seconds to connect to CUCM (running 8.6.2) when it starts.
After Jabber registers with CUCM, there is no issue, it's just very slow to register.
Anybody getting the same behaviour? We have no such issue on previous versions of Jabber for Mac version 8 or Jabber for Windows version 9.
Thanks,
Fabrice

For those interested, I have the answer to my own question: if one of your configured DNS servers is not responding, Jabber 9.2.1 will delay registration to the phone services. This behaviour is seen only in this specifc version of Jabber, hopefully it will be fixed in the next release. Watch out if one of your DNS server goes offilne.
Fabrice

ATA-186 can be registered with CUCM v10.5

Hello guys ;
Please confirm me that ATA-186 can work with CUCM v10.5 ? .
Regards;
Shib

Loaded the latest firmware into CM, then manually on ATA firmware using this process as CM didn't change it:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cata/186_188/3_0/english/administration/guide/sccp/sccp3_0/sccpaapc.html#wp1011450
I followed this link from another post regarding ASA not registering for an older issue.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cata/186_188/3_0/english/administration/guide/sccp/sccpaape.html#wpxref59054
Follow the part that mentions setting the SID0 & SID1 to "." no quotes. I did this and my ATA registered to CM. Screen caps attached.
I have a Cisco ATA 186 running on 10.5.1 and it shows to be registered. I can make calls on it. Not sure how it will do for faxes. HTH Please rate.

Jabber Client on Samsung S3 mini (GT-I8190) cannot register on CUCM 9.1

We have a BE6000 running with CUCM 9.1 and Desktop Phones, Windows Jabber, iPhone Jabber and iPad Jabber are all working.
Now i wanted to register a the Samsung S3 mini (GT-I8190) with Android 4.1.2 and get always the message "Connection failed." - i can ping the CUCM Server from the Phone (it's connected over AnyConnect Mobile Secure Client) and the profile seems to be configured correctly - even tried with another profile and the same error.
The Jabber IM is working fine on the device, just Jubber (Voice) is not working
Baseband version is I8190XXAMD3
Kernel version is 3.0.31-1154865
Build number is JZ054K.I8190XXAMD3

H,
yes i already did that. but when i used the same credentials on a galaxy note 2 i was able to login successfully,

EX60 will not register to CUCM 8.6(2)

Hello,
I am trying to register a new EX60 to a CUCM 8.6(2) server, but the provisioning continually fails. IP connectivity is verified, and both the server and endpoint configurations are correct based on this document: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/telepresence/endpoint/codec-c-series/tc5/administration_guide/administering_endpoints_running_tc5_on_cucm8-6.pdf
When I look at the system status on the EX60 web interface it shows a provisioning error code of "http - error 404".
What am I missing? Is there any DNS requirement if I am not intending to use URIs?

Hello,
I am trying to register a new EX60 to a CUCM 8.6(2) server, but the provisioning continually fails. IP connectivity is verified, and both the server and endpoint configurations are correct based on this document: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/telepresence/endpoint/codec-c-series/tc5/administration_guide/administering_endpoints_running_tc5_on_cucm8-6.pdf
When I look at the system status on the EX60 web interface it shows a provisioning error code of "http - error 404".
What am I missing? Is there any DNS requirement if I am not intending to use URIs?

Recording Cisco phones registered on CUCM 8.6 with Verint Impact 360 not working.

Hello,
We're trying to record audio from Cisco IP phones registered to a CUCM 8.6 using SPAN and Verint Impact 360 with no success.
Verint provided us with some information to do the integration but we understand we don't need to do much on Cisco side besides configuring SPAN session to monitor the traffic we want.
We configured the following SPAN session:
monitor session 2 source interface Gi1/0/1 - 48
monitor session 2 source interface Gi2/0/1 - 47
monitor session 2 destination interface Gi2/0/48
Verint Impact 360 NIC is connected on port Gi2/0/48 but no RTP traffic is being detected.
Phones are connected to ports 1/0/5 and 1/0/6, this is a two 3750E switches stack. The configuration on the ports is:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/5
switchport access vlan 186
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 176
switchport port-security maximum 2
switchport port-security
speed 100
duplex full
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/6
switchport access vlan 186
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 176
switchport port-security maximum 2
switchport port-security
speed 100
duplex full
spanning-tree portfast
Vlan 176 is the voice vlan we're using. Wireshark will see SCCP traffic but nothing else.
Does anybody have any tips or recommendations we could try?
Regards,
Daniel G.

is there any difference when you SPAN based on vlan?
monitor session 1 source vlan 176
monitor session 1 destination interface Gi2/0/48

Cisco 9971 Not Registering on CUCM 8.6

Hey,
Ive run into some trouble with a 9971 phone running on CUCM 8.6. The phone has been registered with the server before with its settings locked down so the access to the settings menu via the phone has been disabled. Around a few weeks later the CUCM server ran into some problems and had to be restored. Since then I am unable to get the phone to register back with the CUCM server. i get the rejected message in the phones tab. and the message Telephony service unavaliable on the phone itself.
I would factory reset the phone however as the settings were locked out from before i am unable to get into the menu and dont know another way to reset the phone, the method used with previous models (turn on hold # then press 1234...etc) does not work.
Any help would be appricated.
Regards,
Fraser

Hello Guys,
Anyone got to solve this problem? I have it on multiple 9951 phones, the factory reset process does not work as the phone apparently ignores that you are pressing the # button... As per the below link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/9971_9951_8961/9_0/english/admin_guide/P567_BK_CEC6105C_00_admin-guide-8961-9951-9971_chapter_01100.html#P567_TK_PB2EC99B_00
"When the light on the Mute button and handset light strip turns                 off and all other lights (Line button, Headset button, Speakerphone button and                 Select button) stay green, press                 123456789*0# in sequence.
When you press                     1, the lights on the line buttons turn red.                     The light on the Select button flashes when a button is pressed.
If you press the buttons out of sequence, the lights on the line                     button, headset button, speakerphone button, and Select button turn green. You                     need to start over and press                     123456789*0# in sequence again."
In my situation this never happen, the line buttons turn on green and after that they all turn off and the phones displays "Phone not registered"

LMS 4.1 - no phone registered in CUCM

Hi all,
the customer has CUCM in the inventory database of LMS 4.1. He has all accesses from LMS to CUCM. One phone 7961 is seen in the UT report. When the customer click on the CUCM in the inventory - there is no IP phone registered in the CUCM. What is wrong?:-( See the attachment.Thank you. Roman

Duplicate post #1.

UCCX and CUCM issue

Hi,
I integrated UCCX 8.5 and CUCM 8.5 in a lab setup using VMware.
Created CTI ports and then some applications including AA application. But when calling from my soft phone to the Trigger, its getting disconnected after 5 seconds. I am not able to hear the prompt also.
Checked and started all the services and resynced all the applications and finally installed CUCM and UCCX again but still the same issue is happening.
Please give some valuable inputs.
Regards..

Hi
You should probably try a debug of the script. Run Script Editor and make sure you log in. The do Debug/Reactive Script, and enter SSCRIPT[aa.aef] in the top box, and 60 in the bottom box.
Then dial the AA.
One of several things should happen:
1) Nothing at all - in this case the system can't run the AA script, and you'll have to look at the logs to find out why.
2) The script will appear, and you can step through it by pressing F10 and see what the script does in real time. As you step through the steps, if you go past a Play Prompt and still get silence, then it might reach a point where it decides you aren't responding and hangs up on you
3) You might get an error in the script
Report back what happens...
Also:
1) What language configuration do you have on the system?
2) If you press the ? key on a 79xx twice quicky during the 5 second call, do you see rx packets increasing?
Aaron

CUCI-Lync cannot register to CUCM 8.5.x

Hi everybody,
Currently I cannot get my CUCI-Lync register to my lab CUCM 8.5x, at the softphone mode, the dialpad greyed out and shown message "Calls cannot be placed at this time".
Then, I check on my CUCM, the status for my CSF<userid> is UNKNOWN.
Which could be the possibility to cause this problem?
Please help me out.
Belows are some capture for more details:
Best Regards,
Tung.

Same problem here,
at times it works at (most) times not.
No way to find out a solution or to find out why it works when it works ...
Ah good past times when Cisco made routers and switches only ...

Register Event Callback issue

I have registered an event called MoveComplete, where the VI lets the user know that the motor's move has been completed, obviously. My issue is that the event is inside a for loop. The motor moves incrementally, and I need the event called after each move so that something can be done before it moves again. I am having timing issues because the MoveRelative method returns after the motor starts moving, instead of after it finishes moving. I tried changing bWait to false but that simply messes up the motor's movement. I tried unregistering for the event, so that in each loop it re-registers and unregisters, but that doesn't work. Is there a way I can call the event multiple times in a for loop?

It's hard to understand what you're trying to do from your written description. Can you attach your code? What motor driver are you using? What library generates the events?

7925G - Registering to CUCM issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for