7u45: MacOS X: Deployment Rule Set not found?

Per the Deployment Rule Set packaging instructions:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/deployment_rules.html#package
"Install the DeploymentRuleSet.jar file on your users' systems in the following directories:
On Windows platforms, install the file in the <Windows-directory>\Sun\Java\Deployment directory, for example, c:\Windows\Sun\Java\Deployment.
On Mac OS X and UNIX platforms, install the file in the /etc/.java/deployment directory.
To view the active rule set, see the Security section of Java Control Panel."
I am able to use and view the rule set on Windows and Linux platforms, but the deployment rule set is not seen under MacOS X (10.9 Mavericks).
I placed it in:
/etc/.java/deployment/DeploymentRuleSet.jar and yes, it is properly signed, in the correct format, etc. Identical file works fine under Windows and Linux.
Anyone else have this issue?

Hurray!! I finally found out how to get the JCP to display the DeployementRuleSet.jar file.
The path in the documentation (/etc/.java/deployment) is wrong (at least on Mac OSX 10.7.5)!.
I went through the decompilation of the ControlPanel source code, and found out that the expected path for the jar file is
/Library/Application Support/Oracle/Java/Deployment
Note:The Deployment directory has to be created

Similar Messages

Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA

Issue Summary
In Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72 and Java 1.8 Update 25 Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA. We've noticed this with Oracle Forms and Reports 11g where we have forms that specify Java 1.6 Update 20. We used to be able to specify Java 1.6 Update 26 in our Ruleset, but now the only version a that works in our ruleset is Java 1.6 Update 20 which is the same version requested by the JPI-Version attribute of the jar. The long term solution would be to upgrade Oracle Forms and Reports, however this isn't currently in the cards.
RuleSet.xml Test
Ruleset.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
<ruleset version="1.0+">
<rule>
   <id location="*.javatester.org" />
   <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
</rule>
<ruleset version="1.0+">
<rule>
   <id location="*.internaldomain.name" />
   <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
</rule>
</ruleset>
Test 1 (Control)
Installed Java Versions:
– 1.7 Update 51 b13 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
– 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
Deployment Ruleset works as expected for both URLs
Test 2
Installed Java Versions:
– 1.7 Update 72 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
– 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
The RuleSet works for JavaTester.org however on internaldomain.name we get the following error:
With the trace logging turned on, I suspected the version attribute supplied by the RIA. I was able to trick Java by adding the following to my system deployment.properties file:
deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_20
deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files (x86)\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
Because the RIA requests 1.6.0_20 it matches 1.6* from the deployment ruleset sooner than 1.6.0_26. However, if 1.6.0_20 is not available 1.6.0_26 should match according to the Deployment Rule Set documentation:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html
The version of the JRE that is used is determined by the following order of precedence:
1. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
2. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
3. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches the version attribute.
4. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches the version attribute.
If no version is available that meets the criteria, then the RIA is blocked, and a message is shown to the user. To provide a custom message, include the message element.
As a result:
If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA and 1.6.0_20 is listed in the deployment.properties file, #1 matches.
If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA, but 1.6.0_20 is NOT listed in the deployment.properties file the #1 SHOULD match, but doesn’t. It used to match up-to and including JRE 1.7 Update 51 however the ruleset appears to no longer match in subsequent versions.
#2 should never match with our current Deployment Ruleset. It would match if we specified 1.7* as a version in the Ruleset.xml.
#3 used to be broken as well after JRE 1.7 Update 51 however this bug has been marked as fixed. See: http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8032781
I have reproduced this issue with Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72, and Java 1.8 Update 25 when one of these versions are installed with Java 1.6 Update 26.

I can't seem to edit this post anymore, for some odd reason.
So here goes;
I found this post in NVIDIA's knowledge base;
When installing an after-market graphics card into a certified Windows 8 PC with UEFI enabled, the s...
The interesting parts in this post are as follows;
When an after-market graphics card is installed into a motherboard with UEFI enabled in the system BIOS, or if the system is a certified Windows 8 PC with Secure Boot enabled, the system may not boot.
UEFI is a new system BIOS feature that is provided on most new motherboards. A UEFI system BIOS is required in order for the Windows 8 Secure Boot feature to work. Secure boot is enabled by default on certified Windows 8 PCs.
In order to get the PC to boot with a graphics card that does not contain UEFI firmware, the end-user must first disable the secure boot feature in the system's SBIOS before installing the graphics card.
Note: Some system SBIOS's incorporate a feature called compatibility boot. These systems will detect a non-UEFI-enabled firmware VBIOS and allow the user to disable secure boot and then proceed with a compatibility boot. If the system contains a system SBIOS the supports compatibility boot, the user will need to disable secure boot when asked during boot process
This leads me to believe that the BIOS update that wrecked my setup was 9SKT58A/9SJT58A, which only contains one change;
"Adds support for updating BIOS from a WIN7 BIOS to a WIN8 BIOS".
I've just ordered a cheap UEFI-compatible GT640 from Gainward, so I hope I'll be able to try that out this weekend.

Deployment Rule Set broken with Java 7u55

Hello!
I'm using Deployment Rule Set in my company environment, its signed by code signing certificate that is given out by internal CA. After I upgraded to Java 7u55, the Deployment Rule Set does not recognize older statically installed Java version.
Versions I have:
7u45 - install directory: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.7.0_45
7u51 - install directory: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.7.0_51
7u55 - install directory: C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.7.0_55 or C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\ - neither does not work
When I go to site described in Ruleset and that has to use Java 7u45, then I receive an message "Deployment Rule Set required Java version 1.7.0_45 not available. In the same way it doesn't recognize 1.7.0.51 or even Java version 6.
When I uninstall Java 7u55, everthing works fine again.
My ruleset looks like this:
<ruleset version="1.0+">
     <rule>
          <id location="first.site.com" />
          <action permission="run" version="1.7.0_45" />
     </rule>
     <rule>
          <id location="second.site.com" />
          <action permission="run" version="1.7.0_51" />
     </rule>
     <rule
          <id />
          <action permission="default" />
     </rule>
</ruleset>
Anyone knows what's wrong or is it a bug?

costlow - I disagree. If I'm using IE, then I only need the internal certficate used to sign the jar to be also insalled on the machine in question in the windows CA Certs store. If the cert was the issue, why does it work with 7u51. If it was a bad cert, it should fail with every version. Plus, I think the pop up has a different error message if it has a cert issue.
I'm having the exact same issue as the OP described and it all started with 7u55. Here's what I've found:
- With 7u55 or 7u60 installed, the error will come up rergardless of what prior version is being requested.
- If 7u51 is the latest installed, it works
- If 8u05 is installed with 7u55 and/or 7u60, it works
- If I install the 7u60 EA b15, it works
Something in the final release is being added that blocks this functionality, but for some odd reason only in the 7 family starting with 7u55.
Any insight you could give would be very helpful. In the meantime, I am deploying 8u05 to cover this up, but it does pose issues for some apps that don't work with the new 8 family plugin.

Getting Deployment Rule Sets to work

So, I'm struggling trying to get Java deployment rule sets working as follows:
Here is my simple ruleset.xml:
<ruleset version="1.0+">
<rule>
<id location="javatester.org" />
<action permission="run" version="1.6.0_35" />
</rule>
</ruleset>
I have gotten this same ruleset working using 3 different older versions of jre7 (7u45, 7u35, 7u9) where javatester.org website will display the specified version, even when a newer version is present. However, this seems to break when I try to specify a jre6 version (tried both 6u35 & 6u27).
For example, when I try 6u35, the javatester.org website displays
Error. Click for details
When I click, a blank pop up windows briefly pops up then disappears, with a title bar "Application Error". I have made the Java console visible for testing purposes, and both the 1.7.0_51 & 1.6.0_35 consoles pop up, but I can't find anywhere why this might not work. I am assuming it's not a certificate issue, as I imported my self-signed certificate into the Signer CA store and can see it in both the Java 7u51 control panel, and the Java 6u35 control panel.
Any thoughts? Anyone else get this working?

Hello,
can you show me your "ruleset.xml"?
I had similar problems when I had an error in there (invalid XML). You have to be extra careful that it is valid UTF-8 too. I already got a problem because of an invalid umlaut,
Regards
Markus

Allowing jnlp via deployment rule set

Hello,
In our network, we use a deployment rule set to only allow applets that we deem necessary, and all others are blocked. This has been working fine. However recently I've been asked to add a website to the allowed list. This website downloads a jnlp file, then launches the jnlp locally, and is blocked every time. Now I'm not that well versed in java applets. But I've added the website address that this applet calls too, and have had no luck with this running. Everything I've tried has not worked.
This is a snippet of the ruleset.xml
<rule>
<id location="http://elm.elluminate.com:80/" /> 
<action permission="run" />
</rule>
The java console has not been helpful, as the application is blocked before java even starts...after the jnlp verifies, it blocks the application due to the ruleset. How can i set this ruleset up so that this jnlp is allowed to run?

Hello,
To allow a local jnlp to run without any prompts using Deployment Rule Sets, you can use a rule to allow all the applets signed with a specific certitificate:
<rule>
        <id>
             <certificate hash="794F53C746E2AA77D84B843BE942CAB4309F258FD946D62A6C4CCEAB8E1DB2C6" />
        </id>
        <action permission="run" />
</rule>
You can get your certificate hash in SHA-256 from the signed jar file following this doc:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html#gethash

Rule BNK_STR_BATCH_RULE_ATTRIB not found -- Error - SEPA Direct Debit --

Hi All,
I am trying SEPA Direct Debit.
I created payment run through F110, and in the log there is a message "Payment run 09/29/2010 ZABK is intended for cross-payment run payment media".
So I ran program SAPFPAYM_MERGE,
I got the message *Rule BNK_STR_BATCH_RULE_ATTRIB not found *
Can anyone please let me know what this error means and what do i do ?
Thanks in advance.
Krishna

Solved: Might help others added following code
**************************Start Add Lines**************
types:
        begin of rssm_s_minfo.
        include structure rsminfohead.
types: end   of rssm_s_minfo.
****************************End Add Lines**************
Start Add Lines *******************
DATA: g_s_minfo     TYPE rssm_s_minfo.
****************************End Add Lines**************

[PWS0007] Operation result set not found.

Hi,
I am working with java,db2 on AS/400.
When I am using my application with multiple users hitting the submit at the same time,I am getting
the following error:
Exception: [PWS0007] Operation result set not found. Cause . . . . . : The handle specified for the operation result set to be filled, returned, or used as the based on result set is not found for the server.
Recovery . . . : Correct the operation result set handle and do the function again.
Can anybody please tell me what could be the problem?
Thanks in advance.

problem could be
1)Resulsets objects are not closing after getting data (like end of rRrsultSet while loop)
2)it is better close statements and connection objects also.

Deployment Rule Set Centrally Managed location of .jar file?

Hello,
We are currently looking at implementing the Deployment Rule Set in our company and I was wondering if there is a way to centrally manage the Deployment Rule Set?
Having to keep up with deploying the jar file for every change and expiring certificates isn't ideal
Thanks!

And your OS doesn't have a file search feature, which might have given you the answer faster than waiting for a response on these columns?
db

CJ20N Rule 1ZPS0001002 not found

Hello,
In creating a project via CJ20N, I am getting the error 'Rule 1ZPS0001002 not found'. I take this error to read that this means that subrule 002 to validation rule ZPS0001 does not exist. I have gone to the following path to check the validation rules and I do in fact see that subrule 002. I'm wondering if anyone here might be able to validate that I am looking in the correct spot, or if I should try looking elsewhere.
The path I took is as follows:
SPRO -> Project System -> Structures -> Operative Structures -> Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) -> Maintain Validations
Something to note here is that I am having this issue in one single QA environment. The problem does not appear when creating a project in another QA client using the same parameters for entry. When I check the validation rules between both QA environments, they look to be exactly the same. This is why I am wondering if I am even looking in the right place.
Does anyone have any idea?
Thanks!

Thanks for the responses so far.
S.murali u2013 I donu2019t believe there is a transport missing between our two different QA systems. Validation rule ZPS0001 is present, and it appears that subrules 001 and 002 are also present in both environments, however the error message is saying otherwise.
Zhenbo u2013 I checked the involved project profile and compared every item and tab between the two systems and they are a match. What catches my eye in the path you provided is in the u2018Controlu2019 tab, and section for validation. The project definition is labeled as u2018ZPS0001u2019 for Project Systems WBS Validations. This is what led me initially to check the validation rules/subrules for ZPS0001 in the first place.
I think I am close, but still not there yet. Thanks both of you for responding and trying to help. Does anyone have any other ideas here?

After deployment got "404 Not Found". How to find the correct URL?

To the experienced:
In preparing to deploy my application, I am using JDeveloper 10.1.3.4 to deploy the application to the standalone oc4j server that is included in JDeveloper. After the deployment, I get the "404 Not Found" error when trying to invoke the application in a browser. The deployment looks OK, becasue the log window in JDeveloper showed no error when running deployment from inside JDeveloper. Therefore I guess the question is how to find out the correct URL to invoke the application. The steps I took in doing the deployment are as follows.
I first installed the standalone oc4j by running the <jdev_home>\jdev\bin\start_oc4j .bat file. The installation is OK because I deployed the SRTutorial applcation and invoked it in a browser successfully.
The WAR file was created by right-clicking the ViewController project and select to create a WAR file. To the application's Context Root its own name, I typed "ZB" in the box for the context root.
Then in ViewController -> Resources, right_click the deployment file (ZBOV.deploy) and chose "Deploy to" the local_standalone_oc4j. The messages in JDeveloper's log window for the deployment are all clean without errors.
I then used this url to invoke the deployed application in a browser:
http://localhost:8888/ZB/faces/staff/login.jspx
But I got an "404 Not Found" error. Right away I tried invoking the SRTutorial application, and it runs fine.
login.jspx is one of the pages for the appllication. In the application navigator, it is located with other files in the ViewController/Web Content/staff folder, therefore I used /staff/login.jspx after ZB/faces.
What could be wrong? If the deployment is actually successful, how to find out the correct url to invoke the application?
Many thanks for your help!
Newman

Hi, Arun,
Thank you for the suggestion. I tried it but got the same error.
I tried it by first undeploying the application using the enterprise manager page (which is also part of the oc4j included in JDeveloper). I select the application and clicked the undeploy link, confirmed that I wanted to remove it. And it was removed.
Then in JDeveloper, I right-clicked the ViewController, and in the properties of the probject selected "J2EE Application" and then selected "Use Custom Settings", then in the "J2EE Web Context Root" box I entered "ZB". Created the deployment profile again, overwriting the existing one, and then right-clicked the ZB.deploy node to deploy to the standalone oc4j on the localhost. And I used the url:
http://localhost:8888/ZB/faces/staff/login.jspx
And I got the same "404 Not Found" error.
There was no error at the time of deployment using the ZB.deploy profile. On the enterprise manager page, the path of the deployed application is given as /C:/jdev10134/j2ee/home/applications/ZB.ear, and the folder of the deployed application is there. Question is: if the deployment is actually OK, can the correct URL be found in some file somewhere in the folder?
All ideas and suggestions are very much appreciated!
Newman

Ref. Oprn. Set not found while crreating - REWORK ORDER

Dear Prasobh & Nandha ,
     Errors in Routing & Referance operation set are cleared.While confirming & saving rework the system propses the order creation after specifying the referance operation set xxxxxxxx & S.Iam getting the same error Referance operation set not fonud.
    I have Created in OPJF selection prioity fof task list type " S " as
01 1     N     1     Production     4     Released (general)
01 2     N     1     Production     2     Released for order
01 3     2     1     Production     4     Released (general)
01 4     2     1     Production     2     Released for order
01 5     S     1     Production     4     Released (general)
I have checked in Opl8 sel id 01 exists.
Can i have your personel id so that i can send screen shots.
Regards
Shankar

Hi
Please check whether these entries are made in
<b>OPL8-Order type Dependent Parameters
Routing selection -3(Routing/Ref.Operation set optional.Automatic)
Sequence Exchange- 0
Task List type - N -routing.</b>
Selection Id - 01
As per this settings if your FG has got routing it will pick the routing automatically otherwise it will ask for a reference operation set,thats valid a one(for your plant),enter that.it will accept
Even after doing these things if u find any error please revert to me.
I assume that while creating the order after giving the quantity,when its'asking the pop up window for Enter reference operation set,check in the task list type whether its of type S-Reference operation set as u have create d a reference opearation set using T code CA11.
Thanks & regards
Karthik
Message was edited by:
        Karthikraj
Message was edited by:
        Karthikraj

Automatic Deployment Rules - Just Not Working/Reboot

Good Morning:
For the better part of 5 days I have been trying to get ADR deployed in my lab to install and automatically reboot machines. I have gotten everything set up and the rule is working and downloading the update, just never making it to the clients to
install the updates and or reboot. For simplicity sake, I created a device collection, "domain controllers" and this finds my two DCs just fine. I then created a ADR
Collection - Domain Controllers, Add to Existing Software Update Group - Software Updates (date released - 2 months, Product - 2008 R2) as both of my DCs are 2008 R2 - Evaluation Schedule (Run on schedule - once a week at 11:30 pm) - Deployment Schedule
(software/specific time 1 hour) (installation/2 hours) - User Experience Software Installation Checked - Then I create a new deployment package and then run it.
It created the deployment packages, and the software update group, I checked the logs and it downloads the files just fine and shows 42 updates needed. However I cannot get those two servers to install updates and reboot for the life of me. I have
google and read everything possible. I checked the permissions of the package source, I created a maintenance window for that time, I attempted to change the work information via powershell in case it was overlapping.
Can anyone please give me a little push in the right direction on what I could possibly be missing?
I did see this in the log,
Could not find element DeploymentId SMS_RULE_ENGINE
1/3/2014 10:03:35 AM 3240 (0x0CA8)
Could not find element UpdateGroupId SMS_RULE_ENGINE
1/3/2014 10:03:35 AM 3240 (0x0CA8)
Could not find element UpdateGroupName SMS_RULE_ENGINE
1/3/2014 10:03:35 AM 3240 (0x0CA8)
SQL is: select cis.CI_ID from vCI_ConfigurationItems cis join vProvisionedCIs pci on cis.CI_ID = pci.CI_ID where cis.CI_ID in (16789853, 16789855, 16789865, 16789867, 16790069, 16790071, 16790077, 16790081, 16790087, 16790089, 16790164, 16790166,
16790193, 16790195, 16790203, 16790205, 16790213, 16790217, 16790221, 16790424, 16790426, 16790430, 16790436, 16790438, 16790444, 16790448, 16790452, 16790509, 16790517, 16790523, 16790527, 16790531, 16790535, 16790537, 16790547, 16790568, 16790574) order
by cis.CI_ID SMS_RULE_ENGINE
1/3/2014 10:03:35 AM 3240 (0x0CA8)
42 of 42 updates are downloaded and will be added to the Deployment.
SMS_RULE_ENGINE 1/3/2014 10:03:35 AM
3240 (0x0CA8)
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated as this is just making me spin in circles.

In the WUAHandler
<![LOG[Failed to Add Update Source for WUAgent of type (2) and id ({425A8C16-C127-4006-B60D-8F04DF0333EB}). Error = 0x87d00692.]LOG]!><time="11:28:02.414+360" date="01-03-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="6796" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2325">
<![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({425A8C16-C127-4006-B60D-8F04DF0333EB}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="12:58:08.788+360" date="01-03-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4344" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1232">
<![LOG[Enabling WUA Managed server policy to use server: http://KSP-SCCM.waw.local:8530]LOG]!><time="12:58:08.788+360" date="01-03-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4344" file="sourcemanager.cpp:948">
<![LOG[Waiting for 2 mins for Group Policy to notify of WUA policy change...]LOG]!><time="12:58:08.803+360" date="01-03-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4344" file="sourcemanager.cpp:954">
<![LOG[Group policy settings were overwritten by a higher authority (Domain Controller) to: Server http://KSP-SCCM:8530 and Policy ENABLED]LOG]!><time="12:58:10.348+360" date="01-03-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="4344" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1013">
<![LOG[Failed to Add Update Source for WUAgent of type (2) and id ({425A8C16-C127-4006-B60D-8F04DF0333EB}). Error = 0x87d00692.]LOG]!><time="12:58:10.348+360" date="01-03-2014" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="4344" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2325">
So now I think that GPO setting maybe causing my issues.

Error while deploying EAR : TLDs not found?

Hi all,
I encountered this error while trying to deploy an EAR using the NWDS for Netweaver CE 7.1.
C:\usr\sap\MIT\J00\j2ee\cluster\server0\temp\deploy\work\deploying\ohs.ear1239681726594\convertwarfile\FCKeditor.tld (The system cannot find the file specified)
I doublechecked the WAR inside the EAR file, and I found that the TLD is indeed in the WEB-INF directory of the WAR. This is the correct place to put it, yes?
Should I reference to it in some other place? or should I move the TLDs to a different directory?
Thank you for your assistance,
Rajendra

Hi, bojidar.
No I don't think there are multiple copies of the TLD in my archive. I suspect the problem lies on the fact that I imported the WAR from my tomcat deployment instead of building the archive directly from the Netweaver Development Studio. Some SAP specific deployment descriptors probably wasn't there.
I have switched to trying to deploy directly from the NWDS though, and although I still haven't managed to deploy successfully, the problem is now different. I'll post about it in another thread.

Need help - can't run a report cause value set not found

APP-FND-00738: error while loading value SET
Posted: Apr 12, 2007 11:16 PM Reply
Hi, I'm trying to run a report (in the parameters form) - i'm getting this error:
APP-FND-00738: error loading value set SETUP_DESCR_VSETS.
APP-FND-01564: error ORACLE 1403 in FDFAVS.
Reason: Fail in program FDFAVS with reason ORA-01403: no data found.
Executed SQL instruction from file &ERRFILE.
Can you advice - which tool I can use to determine which value set didn't load.
Maybe logs or log tables???

I didnt get your problem exactly.
Plz mention the steps what you are doing and where the error is coming.
So that we can see..
--Basava.S

Webcenter Deployment issue - mdsid not found

I am currently working with Oracle Webcenter 10.1.3.2 and trying to deploy the application to standalone OC4J.
I am getting the below error:
Error getting MDS MO : mdsId=/oracle/adf/portlet/BIWCPortletProducer_1202175324609/ap/E6default_e73c379b_0117_1000_8003_0a030f4d69ca.pxml
I checked and ensured that .pxml file exists in the above location.
Has anyone come across this issue?

There are a few things to check:
- check the webcenter developers guide on how to deploy a webcenter app. The deployment part alone is 180 pages, and contains a lot of info!
- check if you use a webcenter deployment profile. This is important, since the ear needs some more files than an ordinary ear.
- you should use a webcenter standalone oc4j to have the necessary libraries. JDev 10.1.3.3 has this as an extension.
- when deploying, JDev asks for an mds location to store the customisations. Take care not to use the same location where JDev stores the development mds information, but a new directory.
- when deploying on another server, use the predeployment tool.
Jeroen van Veldhuizen

7u45: MacOS X: Deployment Rule Set not found?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for