8.1.1.3 Has single step SEA to SIA upgrade instead of two-step
Hi All,
I knew Oracle was working on this but was not expecting this so soon. I am still looking into this. It will be good news for any customers on SEA (horizontal) version given that only SIA will be around going forward.
ACR 529
Provides a single-step upgrade from Siebel Enterprise Applications to Siebel Industry Applications.
Robert Ponder
Lead Architect and Director
Ponder Pro Serve
cell: 770.490.2767
fax: 770.412.8259
email: [email protected]
web: www.ponderproserve.com
What is the business logic that determines whether the program should try to update "today"?
It's an algorithm that checks how frequently user is using the Application: like everyday, every other day, once in a month, etc. If a user is very regular in using the Application then accounts of such users should be updated regularly. As soon as user's login activity gets decreased, it will not stop updating the user’s account rather it will decrease it's update frequence. But as soon as user does login again, it will immediately move into very active queue.
Can you query the base table with similar logic to get the upadteable rows as of "yesterday"?
I am not sure. I will have to check with the DBA. But I would like to know If YES then how it can be helpful.
Similar Messages
-
Two step confirmation in Warehouse
Hi All,
Two step confirmation (We can use this indicator to define whether confirmation of the withdrawal of materials from a storage bin and arrival of materials at the target storage bin is allowed in the warehouse in two steps) indicator has been set for my warehouse.
As the two step confirmation is becoming heavy for the warehouse team, that need to be changed as a single step confirmation.
Will there be any impact on open TOs if i change this from two step to single step confirmation. Will there be any other impacts on warehouse environment.
Rgds
RaulMy suspicion would be that the configuration settings are referenced during TO creation and that TOs are then 'locked' with these settings. So the impact would not be significant, all existing TOs, just created or part processed would need to be completed using 2-step and that new ones would be single step.
Why not just trial it in your development system. Possibly all TOs just become single confirmation and the pick confirmation for existing TOs, where that has happened, becomes irrelevant.
Regards,
Nick
Edited by: Nick Whitehurst on May 21, 2010 3:30 PM -
Siebel 7.0 to 8.1 Is a Two Step Upgrade
Hi All,
I wanted to bring this to everyone’s attention since it caught me by surprise. There is no direct upgrade path from 7.0 to 8.1. 7.5 is the last version that offers a direct upgrade path to 8.1
This is not nearly as bad as it sounds. When done correctly the extra upgrade will only add one week to your development upgrade process. We have done many two step upgrades including 6.x to 7.8/8.0 upgrades as well as SEA to SIA upgrades and once you realize how to properly perform these upgrades the second step is not significant to the project’s duration.
Actually dropping support for 7.0 is really just getting back to business as usual for Oracle. Normally when a new version of Siebel comes out support for the oldest direct upgrade version is dropped. This was the case for 7.7 being the latest version that supports a direct upgrade from 6.x.
Support for 7.0 upgrades was maintained for 7.8 and 8.0. We all just got used to 7.0 being supported but now that direct upgrade path is gone.
Please contact me if you have any questions about how to minimize your two step upgrade project duration. There are certain details you should know about before attempting such an upgrade if you have never performed one before.
HTH,
R
Robert Ponder
Lead Architect and Director
Ponder Pro Serve
cell: 770.490.2767
fax: 770.412.8259
email: [email protected]
web: www.ponderproserve.comI ran the patch and got:
Installed post install CPU files
You are installing OHS_8.1.7.0 component for ORACLE_HOME D:\ORACLE\ORA81
You are installing MODPLSQL component for ORACLE_HOME D:\ORACLE\ORA81
OID_2.1.1.3s is not installed in this Oracle Home
SSO_3.0.9.8.4 is not installed in this Oracle Home
SSO_3.0.9.8.5 is not installed in this Oracle Home
DB_8.1.7.4 is not installed in this Oracle Home
Patch Installation Completed
Then I tried to run the Post Installation Instruction (§3.2.2 of the readme for 5236412):
@D:\ora8174\5236412\catcpu.sql and got a "ORA-20000: server version does not match script".
I can guess this is link to the previous "DB_8.1.7.4 is not installed in this Oracle Home" but why DB_8.1.7.4 could'nt be installed ?
Best Regards,
Guillaume. -
Hi all,
Three simple questions on two step picking:
1) When I delete a pick TO inthe first step of two step picking process the status of pick step on the group still reamains completed and I cannot create pick TO again. How to sort out this?
2) If the pick TO is not created yet I'd like to add another TR to the group. But I didn't find a change group transactions. Once the group is created, it looks like no modification is possible but editing two step relevance on some group's item. How it is expected to do this?
3) How to set a storage type not relevant for two step picking? I've seen that only materials can be set as relevants for two step picking.
Best RegardsHi
Let me explain how two step picking works
Within the 2-step picking process the first step can be repeated many
times because changes of the assigned deliveries may occur or the
requested quantities are not completely available the first time but
the 2nd step the actual picking is done once and marks the completion
of the process. This cannot be repeated for the reference number. If
there are individual delivery changes the TO can be created using LT03
but the multiple processing is no longer possible.
TO confirmation takes place only when the stock is completely moved.
It would not make sense to confirm the movement and then to the
allocation step. The two-step picking process is
1. Pick step (Where stock is picked from the source bin)
2. Allocation step (Where stock is allocated in the destination bin)
3. Confirmation (Where the picker confirms that the movement has been
completed)
You either carry out the first two steps seperately (2 -step picking)
or at the same time. Either way, the confirmation always takes place
last. Hope the above helps to clarify.
Regards,
Ramana
Edited by: A.L.V Ramana on Dec 18, 2009 1:05 PM -
is avaliable two step verification in Croatia?
Not yet according to the quote below from Frequently asked questions about two-step verification for Apple ID - Apple Support
Two-step verification is available in the countries below. When additional countries are added, two-step verification automatically appears in the Password and Security section of your account when you sign in to My Apple ID.
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Bolivia
Brazil
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea
Luxembourg
Macao
Malaysia
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Norway
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Puerto Rico
Portugal
Russia
Singapore
South Africa
Spain
Suriname
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Venezuela
Vietnam -
Hi Champs,
I am trying to configure Two Step Intercompany Pricing but it seems I am missing some configuration.
The scenario is we have two company codes
CC-1--> Always Procures Articles for CC-2
DC belongs to CC-1 and Store Belongs to CC-2.
Please advise what are the configuration steps to arrive at Sales Price using two step Pricing Procedure.
Many Thanks!closed
-
How to pass credentials/saml token exchange to the sharepoint web service ex:lists.asmx when sharepoint has single sign on with claims based authentication
Identity provider here is Oracle identity provider
harika kakkireniHi,
The following materials for your reference:
Consuming List.asmx on a claims based sharepoint site
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/f965c1ee-4017-4066-ad0f-a4f56cd0e8da/consuming-listasmx-on-a-claims-based-sharepoint-site?forum=sharepointcustomizationprevious
Sharepoint Claims based authentication and Single Sign on
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/2dfc1fdc-abc0-4fad-a414-302f52c1178b/sharepoint-claims-based-authentication-and-single-sign-on?forum=sharepointadminprevious
Sharepoint Claim Based Authentication Web Service issuehttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/dd4cc581-863c-439f-938f-948809dd18db/sharepoint-claim-based-authentication-web-service-issue?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
Best Regards
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support -
I can not dowload the new updated software for my Ipod touch 4G. When i do I get an error message that says Network connection has timed out. I have done the trouble shooting steps. Downloaded the latest version of Itunes, and checked network connection
Disabling the computer's antivirus and firewall during the download and update usually resolves the timeout error.
-
Passing String Which Has Single Quote Row/Value to a Function Returns Double Quoate
Hi, I'm getting weird thing in resultset. When I pass String which has single quote value in it to a split function , it returns rows with double quote.
For example following string:
'N gage, Wash 'n Curl,Murray's, Don't-B-Bald
Returns:
''N gage, Wash ''n Curl,Murray''s, Don''t-B-Bald
Here is the split function:
CREATE Function [dbo].[fnSplit] (
@List varchar(8000),
@Delimiter char(1)
Returns @Temp1 Table (
ItemId int Identity(1, 1) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY ,
Item varchar(8000) NULL
As
Begin
Declare @item varchar(4000),
@iPos int
Set @Delimiter = ISNULL(@Delimiter, ';' )
Set @List = RTrim(LTrim(@List))
-- check for final delimiter
If Right( @List, 1 ) <> @Delimiter -- append final delimiter
Select @List = @List + @Delimiter -- get position of first element
Select @iPos = Charindex( @Delimiter, @List, 1 )
While @iPos > 0
Begin
-- get item
Select @item = LTrim( RTrim( Substring( @List, 1, @iPos -1 ) ) )
If @@ERROR <> 0 Break -- remove item form list
Select @List = Substring( @List, @iPos + 1, Len(@List) - @iPos + 1 )
If @@ERROR <> 0 Break -- insert item
Insert @Temp1 Values( @item ) If @@ERROR <> 0 Break
-- get position pf next item
Select @iPos = Charindex( @Delimiter, @List, 1 )
If @@ERROR <> 0 Break
End
Return
End
FYI: I'm getting @List value from a table and passing it as a string to split function.
Any help would be appreciated!
ZKfixed the issue by using Replace function like
Replace(value,'''''','''')
Big Thanks Patrick Hurst!!!!! :)
Though I came to another issue which I posted here:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/a26469cc-f7f7-4fb1-ac1b-b3e9769c6f3c/split-function-unable-to-parse-string-correctly?forum=transactsql
ZK -
My Macbook has version 10.5.8 What version is my next step up? Can I skip to the latest version?
My Macbook has version 10.5.8 What version is my next step up? Can I skip to the latest version?
That depends on which OS your MacBook can support. The system requirements for Mountain Lion 10.8 are here...
http://www.apple.com/osx/specs/
Go to your Apple Menu > About this Mac and tell us your Processor and Memory specs, that way we'll know what you can do. -
Two step and Single step Reservations
hi
am bit confused with the following.
can anyone tell me why cant we use the Reservations for the two step procedures for stock transfer and why for single step procedures?
regardsHi,
It is a very good question and one that is not that easy to answer (and it <u>should</u> be easy).
I have tried to figure out why this should be the case and I cannot think of anything concrete.
perhaps it relates to the use of in-transit and in-transfer stock, perhaps the system cannot cope with reservations that affect these transit stock areas? I don't know why it cannot cope with these but perhaps it relates to the ability to trace reservations from within transactions such as MMBE etc. perhaps it is too difficult to show a list of reservations that are increasing in transit stock?
Sorry i can't help a lot with this, but the above is the only thing I can imagine would be the reason?
Steve B -
I'm looking for the old toolbar that doesn't double post the web adress and only has single line entries and the extension xpi doesn't work with my new computer
Mike wrote:
> Could someone tell me why this prototype-based lightbox
seems to work on one
> of my sites but not on the other?
>
> I literally took the exact same .js & css files,
copied them over from one
> site to the other, but it's only partially working on
the new site.
>
> Works :
>
http://www.roxanacampagiorni.com/
>
> Doesn't work :
>
http://www.vilverset.com/sample.html
>
> Been troubleshooting this one for days, and I'm stumped.
Script wants
> nothing to do with lightboxing HTML files on the new
site. Only straight
> JPGs. But it was written to work with them, and it
*does* work with them
> just fine on the *other* site.
>
> Where is the anomaly between the two sites that's
causing it to break in
> sample.html?
>
>
Not sure if this is relevant but on the page that works you
have these
js files linked - 4.....
<script type="text/javascript"
src="/scripts/jscripts.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="/scripts/prototype.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="/scripts/effects.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="/scripts/control.modal.2.2.3.js"></script>
and on the page that doesn't - 3......
<script type="text/javascript"
src="/scripts/prototype.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="/scripts/effects.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="/scripts/control.modal.2.2.3.js"></script>
HTT
chin chin
Sinclair -
This is an Warning message that got on the Embedded Lights Out manager of an X2200M2 server:
"DIMM 4 has single-bit error"
I also have a orange flashing light on front of the server.
What does it mean exactly ?Glance through this forum thread from May 2006:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=830&threadID=5097092
Then use your contract login to Sunsolve and read the following Infodocs:
70361
79928
74049 -
One job with two steps - how to create one single spool?
Hello experts,
I have created two queries in SQVI. One is based on the table BSIK, the other on on BSAK.
The report layout is the same in both queries.
Now I schedule one job in SM36/SM37 with two steps corresponding to my queries.
I want my second step to append the spool created in the first step. Is that possible?
In order to do this I unchecked "New spool request" in the request attributes for the second step of the job.
I use the same printer, the same format (X_65_80), but it doesnt work.
The help on the field says
".... name, output device, number of prints and the format must match..." - What "name" do they mean?
"In addition, the existent spool order must not already be competed. This can occur if a spool is released for output...." - I use "send to SAP spooler only" option, is that what thay mean? How cen you have an "uncompleted spool" in the job.
If anybody knows ho to do this (without development!), please advise
Best regards,
FatimaHi,
Please do following steps :
1. Go to transaction code SM36
2. Do as per below screen shots
You can see Job steps is empty
Click on (Check and Save)
Next Screen
You can see one step created
Click on Create
You can see above it is showing as Step 2
Give again program name and variant
Click on (Check and Save)
You can see two steps are created
Go back (green arrow)
You can see know SAP is showing 2 Step(s) successfully defined which was earlier blank
Click on
Next Screen
Now schedule job as per your requirement.
Prerequisite create variants for both the programs as we need to mention the same .
Hope, this solves your issue else revert.
Regards,
Tejas -
Locked out of Apple ID AND lost Recovery Key for two-step verification
Hey guys,
Firstly, as the title implies, this is a double-whammy of a problem, and obviously, it is very much my fault. The reason I'm bothering to post this, however, is to find out if anyone else has had this issue and where they are at with it.
The story:
I set up two-step verification on my Apple ID about a year ago as I thought it was a good idea. I wrote the Recovery Key down as it told you to, and put it in a folder full of other important documents. In a epic mental lapse, however, I now remember later throwing out that folder, forgetting about my Recovery Key. Ya, that is my fault, I'm and idiot. Anyways...
Fast forward to a few days ago, and I all of a sudden received messages on all my devices saying that my Apple ID had been disabled for security reasons, and that I had to reset the account in order to regain access to it. Scary, but no problem, right? Well, after entering my Apple ID into iForgot.com, the first thing it asked me for was my Recovery Key. This is around the time I was banging my head against the wall in realization that I had thrown it away, but I was relieved to see the "Lost your Recovery Key?" option at the bottom of the screen. I was even more relieved to discover that I had what I needed to reset it: my current password and a trusted Apple device. The catch was that to reset it, I needed to log into my Apple ID to initiate it, which of course I couldn't do because it had been disabled, and the only way for me to disable it is, again, to enter in my Recovery Key. This effectively put me in and endless loop, without any apparent way of gaining accesses to my account. I did contact Apple about it, and I was ultimately told that the lock on my account was so tight, that not even Apple could gain access to it.
I understand that this level of security is probably the whole reason for the two-step verification in the first place, and I again concede that it was extremely foolish of me for forgetting about and discarding my Recovery Key, but a few things still don't make sense...
1. Why would they put a "Lost your Recovery Key?" link on the password recovery page when a password is needed to reset the Recovery Key itself?
2. As far as I can remember, Apple, in their briefing of how two-step verification works, did not bring up this scenario, which is probably relatively common. They DO mention that they can't help when you don't have access to two of the three necessary things for recovery, but they never brought up the apparent exception of if the account is disabled, in which case having two of the three things needed is not enough. I don't understand how they couldn't have mentioned this scenario.
3. Given the above thought, how could Apple not have some sort of special contingency for this type of situation? I profess my ignorance of how these types of systems are set up, but I would feel that there should be a special method for recovery in place if the account has been locked, and the owner is able to verify that they have the password and trusted devices.
I didn't mean to make it sound like a rant. I ADORE Apple, but this system seems like it's less than perfect.
Has anyone else ran into this issue? If so, is your situation similar to mine?
Thanks for any response!Hey everyone.
It's been awhile, but I wanted to share with anyone who is interested some general knowledge about this issue that I have learned while communicating with Apple support. Unsurprisingly, the issue is still unresolved, and I am under the impression that it will remain that way, but I'm still trying to get in touch with one of the senior representatives I spoke with a while ago who seemed to think that there might be a solution, so I suppose there is still a chance that things could turn out for the better.
Here's the rundown:
Anytime you are unable to sign in to or access your account because of "security reasons", your account is under what is called a "DS Lockout".
A DS Lockout on an Apple ID can be triggered for a few reasons, such as when too many failed logins to the Apple ID (using an incorrect password) are attempted, or when a purchase is made that Apple believes to be fraudulent.
Under normal circumstances, a DS Lockout only lasts for 8 hours, after which the lock is lifted and access to the account by inputting the correct password is re-enabled.
This is where the catch for anybody who set up two-step verification is.
According to one of Apple's security representatives, IF you have two-step verification enabled upon being inflicted with a DS Lockout, the 8-hour lockout period is extended indefinitely as an additional security measure (a feature, I suppose). Therefore, the only way to regain access to the account is by resetting the password, as waiting for the lockout to expire is no longer an option. And of course, resetting your password, as stated by Apple, is one of the situations in which you need your Recovery Key. EVEN IF YOU KNOW WHAT THE ACCOUNT'S CURRENT PASSWORD IS, the lockout prevents you from being able to input it as a means of authentication. You MUST reset your password in order to regain access, and you MUST input your recovery key in order to reset your password.
So, that seems to be the gist of it. It does make sense, but here's my problem:
Upon setting up two-step verification, Apple does warn you of many things, but they do not make any mention of this specific scenario. Indeed, it is very much my fault for loosing my verification key, but the thing is, I’m human, I make mistakes, and I know that I will continue to do so. One of the reasons I chose to take the risk of setting up two-step verification is because Apple explicitly stated that as long as I had access to two of the three required "keys" -- my Recovery Key, my password, and at least one of my trusted Apple devices -- I would always be able to gain access to my account. In other words, as long as I didn’t screw up so bad as to loose access to two of my keys, I’d be okay. Obviously, there is a huge exception to this case that, again, is not mentioned anywhere, hence all the confusion. Had I know that it was possible that it could come down to me needing a single, specific key to regain access to my account, I probably would have opted out of two-step verification, recognizing that as a busy college student who's constantly reorganizing and dealing with tons of forms, worksheets, and other various documents, it's not as easy to hold on to a slip of paper as it might be for others. I'm hoping that at some point, Apple adds a big, red warning to the setup process which reads something like:
"In the event that your Apple ID is locked due to a detected security risk, your Recovery key will be necessary to regaining access to your account; knowing your password and/or having access to any of your trusted devices will no longer be enough."
I really do appreciate how seriously Apple takes its security, but I think that there is still room for improvement. This should start with more clearly and fully stating the conditions of its security measures, as well as having its customer support be more educated on these conditions (they themselves stated that they had never been trained on issues revolving around two-step verification). Protecting someone's private information is important, but so too is making every possible effort to ensure that customers can't easily loose access to all the content and services that they have spent much time and money building up and using.
As stated above, I'm still trying to get a hold of the Apple representative who initially assisted me, so if I have any additional updates, I'll be sure to reply to this thread. I hope that anyone who is going through the same issue, or is simply curious, finds this information to be useful.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi everyone, I'm trying to start a bootcamp installation of Windows 7 though an external monitor using HDMI. Is there anyway to have the installation screen show up on the external monitor? I get stuck at the beginning of the installation due to not
-
How can I send an audio file via mms that isn't a MEMO?
Can someone please help? Am i missing something here? i have an Iphone 4 and I cannot find how to do this.... Any help greatly appreciated, thanks.
-
Appleworks fails to launch under Leopard
Appleworks 6.2.9 fails as soon as it begins to display recent documents. Has anyone else experienced this problem?
-
Network Settings for Verizon DSL
I have some basic questions about network preferences for DSL. I spent the day on the phone with Verizon yesterday trying to figure out how to configure settings on my modem, and in the process, had my connection broken and fixed four different times
-
My movie download is stuck in process mode for 10 hours
I downloaded a movie to watch on a trip and for the last 10+ hours it's seems to be stuck in the process mode. I can't watch the movie I can't delete the movie,