8.4RC mentions support for Fuji lens profiles - any details known?

Curious if this is new support or if it's always been there and now ACR shows a message about it. I installed the ACR 8.4RC and loaded a RAW file from my X-T1. Looking at the Lens Corrections tab and the Profile sub-tab, there's now a message at the bottom that says "Built-in lens profile applied: XF14mmF2.2 R. Click for more info." When I clicked, a small dialog box appeared which  offered a little more info:
Fujifilm X-T1
XF14mmF2.8R
This raw file contains a built-in lens profile for correcting chromatic aberration and vignetting. The profile has already been applied automatically to this image.
I experimented and got this for RAWs shot with my X-E2 as well and also my 18-55 and 55-200 lenses. I then went back to ACR 8.3 and confirmed that the messages are not there.
I notice that despite what they say, going to the Color sub-tab and checking Remove Chromatic Aberration was still required for some images.
I didn't see this aspect of the update listed in any release notes. Does anyone know any details about this? Is there a way to turn it off if so desired? I'm curious if the Fuji profile is as good as one that could be created with the Lens Profile Creator. The message doesn't mention geometric correction which would be nice.

The information about what built-in lens profile is being applied is new to ACR 8.4, but the application of built-in lens profiles is not new. 
Whether those lens profiles do a perfect job is another matter, of course.  And just like in previous versions, you cannot turn the built-in profiles off, but if someone creates an external profile those can also be applied. 
The one thing to be careful of is if the built-in lens profile also corrects the same aspect as the external profile, for example, vignetting, then it’ll get double-corrected and the way to avoid this is to set the manual strength setting of that profile correction parameter, either vignetting or distortion, to its minimum value, effectively turning off the external profile’s contribution.

Similar Messages

  • Looking for a lens profile...

    Hi to all, I'm looking for a lens profile to use with Lightroom 5.7.1 and Photoshop CC 2014, the lens is a Canon Macro EFS 60mm USM, body Canon 600D.
    Anyone have or know if the profile is available?
    Thanks in advance
    Stefano

    There should already be a lens profile for that lens included in camera raw 8.7.1 and lightroom 5.7.1

  • Proper support for Fuji EXR Raw Files

    There is still no proper support for Fuji  EXR Raw files.  On any Fuji X-series camera, the in-camera raw processing, including specifying options always outputs a far superior image that Adobe Camera Raw 6.  I've been using an X100 for some time now, and have really gathered some great images with it. But Adobe Camera Raw fails miserably to understand how to process these files.
    This is more of a complaint and feature request than a question, because I already know the answer. Adobe has not worked close enough, or at all, with Fuji to develop a Raw processor for the EXR pixel layout.
    The EXR pixel arrangement offers new possibilities, especially the ability to take an HDR image of a moving subject, and without a tripod. The elimination of the low-pass filter allows for more sharpness, and finally the noise pattern is much more "film-like".
    I've been using Adobe Photoshop for processing images for years, but have no compelling reason to upgrade without a proper conversion for Fuji RAW files.
    Adobe: Please work with Fuji to bring world-class support for EXR Raw images.
    Thank you,
    William

    Good day!
    Adobe has not worked close enough, or at all, with Fuji to develop a Raw processor for the EXR pixel layout.
    There seems to be a reason why Adobe has to reverse engineer RAW formats – the camera manufacturers don’t want their customers to use Adobe (and other) software to process their RAW files. (If their proprietary software gets better results then that’s understandable, but for how long are they going to support their own software?)
    Now maybe Fuji is more cooperative than others, but do you know that for certain?
    I've been using Adobe Photoshop for processing images for years, but have no compelling reason to upgrade without a proper conversion for Fuji RAW files.
    If the new/improved features of Photoshop CS6 have no significance for the way you process, manage, edit and touch-up photographs feel free to stick with whatever version of Photoshop you use currently, but be aware that hardware/OS changes on your side may some day make that version inoperable on your set-up.
    Also the upgrade path has been cut down to one version, if I understand correctly.
    Anyway, this is a beginners Forum, feature requests might be better posted over at
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family
    Regards,
    Pfaffenbichler

  • HT204266 My iPad (version 1, IOS 5.1) has quit connecting with the store. I am unable to update or buy any app. I did a reboot and a reset with deleting the data. I can not find anything in support for this problem. Any help will be appreciated.

    My iPad (version 1, IOS 5.1) has quit connecting with the store. I am unable to update or buy any app. I did a reboot and a reset with deleting the data. I can not find anything in support for this problem. Any help will be appreciated.

    My iPad (version 1, IOS 5.1) has quit connecting with the store. I am unable to update or buy any app. I did a reboot and a reset with deleting the data. I can not find anything in support for this problem. Any help will be appreciated.

  • Support for Fuji X-T1 Lens profiles

    Why doesn't Lightroom 6 CC have the profile corrections/support for the Fuji X-T1 lenses?

    Are you seeing uncorrected distortions or just wondering why your lens isn't listed in the lens profile area?  For mirrorless cameras, like I believe the Fuji is, the lens profiles are built-in (perhaps even in the raw file, itself) and always on and there is nothing to select in the lens profile list dropdown because the profile is being gotten a different way.

  • LR 5.4 and embedded Fuji lens profiles -- true or not?

    Hello there, I have just bought LR 5.4 and was looking forward to using it with my Fuji X-T1. The camera is supported by I can't find any lens profiles for the XF lenses. I saw on the Web LR apparently used embedded lens profiles found in the RAW files. Is this true? If so, how does it work and why are there unofficial lens profiles available via the lens profile downloader? What benefit do these offer?

    Photoshop CC and ACR 8.4 have a way to see when a built-in profile is used, and yes the newer Fuji cameras have built-in lens profiles.  Lens Profiles can correct chromatic aberration, geometric distortion and vignetting.  Sometimes a built-in profile only corrects some of those, so a downloadable profile could be adding a correction the built-in one doesn't do, or improving on it in some way.
    Here is an example of the built-in profile for an X100S correcting for CA and vignetting but not geometric distortion, so it could make sense that another profile could be built to correct for the latter.
    My understanding is that the built-in profiles correct for the same issues as the camera does for its own JPGs, and any external profile is for additional corrections.

  • Looking for lightroom lens profile for tamron lens

    I am using lightroom 5 at work and shot some images with a canon 5d2 body with tamron 24-70 2.8 vc and tamron 70-200 2.8 vc lense. According to the note below, both lens are supported since lightroom 4.1.  However I can not find the profile of these two lens on lightroom 5.  Does anyone how I can bring the profile back in?  Thanks.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/lens-profile-support-lightroom-4.html

    The ProgramData folders are for Photoshop and are probably as old as the newest version of PS or DNG Converter you have.
    The lens profiles for Lightroom 4 and 5 are under LR's Resources subfolder:
    C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop Lightroom x.x\Resources\LensProfiles\1.0\
    (x.x = whatever version of LR you have)
    For my LR 4.4  I have the following 16 subfolders under LensProfiles\1.0:
    Apple
    Canon
    Fujifilm
    Hasselblad
    Leica
    Mamiya
    Nikon
    Pentax
    Phase One
    Samsung
    Schneider
    Sigma
    Sony
    Tamron
    Tokina
    Zeiss
    LR 5.3 adds DJI and GoPro as manufacturers for a total of 18 subfolders.

  • Why no RAW support for Fuji X10?

    The Fuji X10 has been on the market for almost a year now and there still is no RAW support for it in Aperture. Why?

    Only Apple can asnwer the "Why?" questions, I'm afriad.
    Aperture menu -> Provide Aperture Feedback and let them know you want it.

  • Aperture 1.1......still no support for Fuji S2 and S3 Pro!!!!

    I just got the 1.1 update but i was devastated to see that Aperture is still not opening the Raw files of two of the most used camera among professional:Fujifilm S2 and S3 Pro!!!
    Even if i convert the files in DNG it doesn't support them
    I would like to know how can Apple describe Aperture as "Designed for Professional Photographer"..............
    Just look around, all pro application like Capture One or Camera Raw support those cameras,even the beta version Adobe Lightroom does it
    There are not excuse for this..... not anymore
    Thanks
    Ettore

    Ettore, It is clear that 2 things shape the Apple
    product pholosophy with "pro apps"; A total
    disregard of anything that does not guarantee a
    corner on the market and support of any system that
    does not lead directly to a hardware sale. The very
    poor handling of the bugs/deficiencies of Aperture,
    the poor (read nonexistent) communication with end
    users
    You mean like the mesages from Joe Schor on this forum? Or the whole web page announcing 1.1 features? Those non-existant communications?
    and the total disregard of what real
    professionals tell them
    You mean like focusing the 1.1 update on better RAW conversion quality, performance, and the addition of DPI features everyone was asking for?
    Given that Apple cannot fix every single problem I'd say they worked on exactly the problems bedeviling the most users.
    The disregard for Fuji RAF files is
    not surprising in that context.
    No, it's not surprising because (a) it's not Canon or Nikon, which most professionals are using, and (b) because the Fuji sensor is unlike other sensors and is therefore not quite as easy for Apple to use similar conversion techniques.
    The same can be said
    of Bibble and others, and their lame protestations to
    the contrary will fall on deaf ears. Like you said,
    Lightroom, which is still in beta supported fuji raw
    right from the start.
    Which is because (for better or worse) Lightroom sits on top of the ACR conversion engine that has been in development for something like three or four years! Give Apple a little time to add other cameras, in the meantime bug Fuji to push Apple to add support!
    <...>
    The geniuses at Apple will find
    that working pros pick the tools that help deliver
    the goods to the client
    <...>
    Yes they will, which is why Aperture has been so popular and will be even more so with RAW conversion quality addressed.
    <...>
    Thank goodness their are other software products
    available that come from companies that DO listen to
    their customers.
    <...>
    Yes, like Apple. All indication are that they do indeed listen to user feedback (indeed Apple reps themselves have said so) and the end results of updates also indcate they are listing. At PMA every single half hour presentation ended with "Send us feedback because we are listening".
    I don't think it's fair to tag Apple with being hopelessly out of touch with users just because they will not fix the only problem you care about.
    My camera is not supported by Aperture either, but I realize the reality of owning a camera that is not Nikon or Canon in today's market. Until then I simply import 16-bit TIFF images into Aperture and use it from there. Not having your camera supported directly is not really that great a limitation.

  • Lightroom support for Fuji X-Trans???

    From DP review:
    Just came back from D-Clic photo show in Montreal and had the chance to talk with Billy from Fuji Guys. He asked me if I was happy with my X-Pro1 and I said yes, very happy BUT would like Adobe and others to better support it (or at all in the case of Aperture...). I expected him to play it safe but he actually acknowledged the problem right away and told me that they recently signed a non-disclosure agreement with both Adobe and Apple and provided them with specs for supporting the X-Trans sensor !
    He said he is also pushing strong with Fuji to add support for TIFF in the camera so that could be another good thing for some.
    Lets hope this leads to progress...
    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3286994
    Hope this is the real deal…

    I had contact with Adobe support on Friday. They are aware of the problem, but could not confirm me that it will be fixed in LR 4.4. We need more pressure!!!

  • When will camera raw support for Fuji Xpro 1 will be available?

    Today Apple has just updated camera raw for new camera models but I can't find update for Xpro 1 ? Why does it take so long to have such update? Appple please makes update for Fuji Xpro 1. Thank you.

    You're not addressing Apple here, and no one knows any more than you do about what Apple will do.

  • Support for bi-directional GIOP any time?

    One thing I was wondering about while preparing for a presentation was why bidirectional GIOP isn't supported in the 1.5 version of the ORB? The default uni-directional nature of IIOP is the achilles heel with CORBA in terms of the firewall penetration issue. (I think most agree now that making IIOP one-way was a fundamental design mistake. Bidirectional should probably be the default now.) I was just curious why Sun hasn't pursued a firewall friendly version of their version of CORBA. RMI has some support for firewall penetration, it'd be nice to see something similar for CORBA as well and further support in RMI such as full duplex communication. (If you're using Applets or trusted applications, I don't see any reason not to support multiplexed communication. ) It'd be nice to have alternative solutions in available in the JDK for the firewall penetration problem other than HTTP-based solutions. (I know that Jacorb and OpenOrb already support bi-directional GIOP, but it'd be great to have better support in the bundled version as well.)
    Thanks!
    Rob

    I had an exchange with Sun some time ago about this and IIRC they were not convinced of the viability of the specification, can't remember the details, sorry, it's a long time ago. Are there other implementations of bi-di IIOP?

  • How to unlock iphone 3gs, its not supporting for other networks, can any bady help me...

    Hi,
    i am using Apple IPhone 3GS,... with Vodafone Service, in INDIA.
    but now its not supporting for any other Service's,
    can any bady tell me how to Unlock the Iphone...

    Only the Carrier the phone is Locked to can Unlock it... you need to Contact the Carrier.

  • Support for FUJI Real 3D W1 .MPO Format

    Does anyone know if this new format for storing 3d images created by the new Fuji camera is going to be supported by iphoto 09, there are a lot of us stereographers out here that use this new format and camera and only use Macs, its bad enough that Fuji haven't produced any decent software for this camera but i would like to see the ability to store these photos in my library even if i cant edit them directly with Iphoto, there are specific product for this that work well, it just cataloging them i want to see.

    What format are the photos? If the 3d is just two JPEGs viewed together with special software then they would import and be available as individual photos in iPhoto but not as 3D photos - and it it might not be easy to access them with the 3d software
    Tell us more about the photos format and viewing if this does not help - I've never seen or hear of the process
    LN

  • New RAW support for Fuji X10 camera

    I really appreciate all the work that must be done at Adobe in order to keep up with new cameras and their un-ending parade of new RAW file formats. Case in point, the new Fuji X10. RAW support was added for this model in the most recent Lightroom/Photoshop update and I was very glad for that since I acquired a new X10 just a couple of weeks ago. However, I am not able to get a handle on the noise reduction and sharpening aspects of the RAW files from the X10. Is it possible that since Fuji uses a non-typical array on their EXR sensor inside the camera that the usual sharpening and noise reduction controls are not adequate? They produce some very strange and inpleasant results. It's really puzzling since I have been a ACR user for many years with other camera makes and models and have always been able to optimize the RAW files in such a way as to better the camera's JPEG output. Not so with the X10. I should note that all the other adjustable parameters seem to work as would be expected when processing RAW files from the X10. It's just the Noise and Sharpaning parameters which do not seem to work very well. At least not as well as the camera's own internal noise and sharpening processing does. Suggestions? Maybe I'm misssing something, but I think I have tried every combination of adjustment possible from within Lightroom to try and improve the noise and sharpening from X10 files, but with very little success. It actually seems to work better to re-process out of camera JPEGs or "in camera processed" RAW files. At least the results from these files act more like one would expect, but this does give up much of the flexibility of working directly on a RAW file especially in areas such as recovering highlight detail, etc.
    Hope someone can provide some answers!
    Tom

    Exactly my experience, plus blue/cyan difficult to get right, on 2 (Apple) computers/monitors...OOC jpegs are good, more easily processed, what gives?

Maybe you are looking for