9.1 UI Customization for Field Display Size

Hi, Guys,
Just upgrade from 9.0 to 9.1 and started to do the UI customization.
I noticed it seems that we can move around those fields on the forms, but we can not resize them. Is that correct?
If we can, please advise how to. How about UDFs?
Frank

How did you go about updating your library to iPhoto 9?

Similar Messages

Could oracle auto-cut inserted value to fit for field's size?

i insert string into oracle table, but when string's length is longer than field's size, i will get error information.
whether oracle could auto-cut my string's length to fit for field's size, then insert it?
if it needs configure oracle, how?
thanks in advance

Use SUBSTR function to cut the length of the filed required.
Hope fully it will work .
Best Of Luck.
omer.

Need to Increase OTL Field Display Size

In OTL, I modified the user-customizable views PA_ONLINE_PROJECTS_V to display the Project Number in this concatenated format...
(ProjNum) ProjDescription
using...
CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW apps.pa_online_projects_v (
     project_number,
     project_name,
     project_id,
     project_type,
     start_date,
     completion_date,
     carrying_out_organization_id,
     carrying_out_organization_name
AS
SELECT DISTINCT
     DECODE(project_number,SUBSTR(project_name,1,LENGTH(project_number)),project_name,SUBSTR('('||(project_number||') '||project_name),1,25)),
     project_name,
     project_id,
     project_type,
     start_date,
     completion_date,
     carrying_out_organization_id,
     (SELECT
          name
     FROM
          apps.hr_all_organization_units
     WHERE
          organization_id = carrying_out_organization_id)          carrying_out_organization_name
FROM
     apps.pa_projects_expend_v;
However, only the first 25 characters show up on the LOV and timecard. Other than that, it works perfectly across the system.
Does anyone know how to increase this from 25 to, say, 48 char? Oracle provided a white paper on this, but it only shows how to make the field display wider--not increase the number of characters.

Do you mean to say that LOV field is having width more than 25 chars but it still shows only 25 chars?
Are you using a seeded projects layout or a modified one? If it is a modified one, what is the value of QUALIFIER ATTRIBUTE5 for that LOV component?
--Shiv

For which display size is Labview 2012 optimized?

Hi,
I have a lap top with a high resolution (1920x1080). After I installed Labview2012, on some of the dialog boxes, ex. Tools->Options (see attached image) not all text is shown completely.
Also, when I opened VI designed for a lower resolution display I get overlapping on labels and controls.
Can anyone tell me if this is due only to the display resolution or also the Labview? And to what display size is Labview2012 optimized?
Regards
Solved!
Go to Solution.

It looks to me like you've set windows fonts to Large, casuing labels to increase in size.
From LV 8(?) to 2009 (or is it a windows thing?) the standard font increased from 14 to 15 causing some mess in block diagrams.
/Y
LabVIEW 8.2 - 2014
"Only dead fish swim downstream" - "My life for Kudos!" - "Dumb people repeat old mistakes - smart ones create new ones."
G# - Free award winning reference based OOP for LV

Selection options for field display text instead of key

Hi All,
In the selection screen in my reports, when the user clicks on the selection options for one the fields to display the possible values they can use. Instead of the key the pop up box only displays the text for that field. This is an issue because one of the fields is equipment number and the user needs to be able to see the key not the descriptions. This is occurring in multiple reports and for multiple fields. I haven't been able to find anything in the infoobject properties or the query properties to change this.
Please help!
Edited by: Anthony Loh on Sep 29, 2010 10:57 PM

Hi Anthony,
Cud u pls check in backend how it is created ...
RSA1>Mdeling>IO Properties>Second tab BEx properties>Display-->it shud be Key and not text...
Check this and come back ..
Rgds
SVU123

Swap 15 for 17" display

I just bought an iMac G4 flat panel display for a backup machine. I'm just curious for now - can the 15" monitor be swapped for a 17"? Anyone done this? Know How? Advice?
TiPB G4-400 & PowerMac G4/400 (Sawtooth) Mac OS X (10.3.2)

Although the iMac G4s share some parts the strength of the neck and weight of the base vary for the display size. My experience of pulling apart these machines would lead me to counsel against any such plans unless you treat the machine as disposable. Far better to buy a 17" version - the logic board specs will almost certainly be higher too.
mrtotes

Windows 8.1 forgets dpi / display size settings for one monitor on almost every reboot

I use TV 32" with 1920x1080 and cintiq 13" with 1920x1080
when I boot my PC the resolution is fine but DPI is wrong.
In smaller monitor It's look like DPI is higher than the bigger one.
I already set dpi to be the same (smallest 100%) but it's not work until I do something to change display setting.
It's really annoy me. This problem is not happen when I use windows 8
Only solution I found is turn off
"Turn on fast start-up".
When I do that It's boot like what I want. every monitor is the same DPI.
But it'll make my boot time longer.
It should be just start up windows and use the same dpi from the start.
So I think this problem is a bug in windows 8.1
Best regards

Thank you for reply.
I've already used the latest graphic card driver. But It's won't help this issue.
In registry editor. I check those variables then value of them is already set like that blog suggest.
So , it look like when windows start-up(with fast start-up) It use something like
suggest value for different monitor size instead of what I set in control panel. But when I turn off fast start-up windows use my setting value.
And I think there are a lot of people who got the same problem as me.
Here is an example.
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-desktop/windows-81-forgets-dpi-display-size-settings-for/385cb615-d699-47f8-8c12-717e3364c866

Setting values for non-displayed fields on a Tabular Form

I'm having a problem setting non-displayed fields on the same table as displayed fields like last_update_date, last_updated_by, id's and other fields when creating new records or updating existing records in a Tabular form.
What is the best and easiest way to set these values without using database triggers?

Hi Jes,
I'm a little reluctant to use database triggers as I used this product a couple of years ago and I'm fairly sure I handled this problem in HTML DB without the use of triggers. I am therefore I'm getting a touch frustrated that I can't remember how to do it now !!
Do you know of any way of setting values for non-displayed fields on a Tabular Form without using database triggers?
Also, you seem to be suggesting that database triggers is the best way to do this?
Thanks

Delimiter for multiple display fields

Hi ,
Is there any way in MDM so we can change the delimiter for multiple display fields.
Suppose for a lookup table code and description both are display fields.In Data manager when we select main table as our current table ,value in that lookup field will appear as code,description ,but as per the requirement it should be hyphen separated i.e code- description.
Is there any way we can change the delimiter.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Neethu Joy

Hi Neethu,
No, there is no way to change the delimiter but I can suggest you some workaround.
Create one more field in same lookup table and mark it as display field. Create one assignment with the expression code&"-"&Description and put it in workflow having trigger action = Record Create and Record Update with Automatic launch action. With this, whenever you modify lookup data i.e. either code or description workflow will automatically update the third filed.
Just check if this fits in your requirement.
Regards,
Jitesh Talreja

Optimize Slide size for McBook display. Is 1280x792 the perfect format?

Using any of the proposed format in Keynotes 09 will leave you a dark bar on both left and right side. Hence I've changed the slide setting to 1280x792 and it really fits nicely on the screen for any display.
Haven't tried yet with a video projector or on printed material, yet I'm assuming people who will use the presentation will just view it on their laptop.
Have anyone of you tried this as well. Any experience to share? Thanks
Laurent

". A dedicated removeable rechargeable battery (not AA/AAA) When MP3 players have a dedicated, non-standard rechargeable battery, the MP3 player also doubles as the battery charger. I don't want to use rechargeable AA/AAA batteries, because unless the MP3 player has a built-in AA/AAA charger (I highly highly doubt any MP3 player charges standard batteries), I'd have to be lugging around either a bunch of batteries or a AA/AAA battery charger. And that kills the point of being portable. "
AA and AAA rechargeables are great. One can usually charge up to four at a time with most chargers, and chargers that take an hour or less are available(the 5 minute chargers require special batteries and put excessi've strain on the batteries). They are also very inexpensi've. Carrying a few spares is no big deal. I have small plastic cases that were specifically made to hold 2 AA or AAA batteries and other cases specifically designed for 4 of them. I would hate to have to swap out the player battery, swap in the spare then plug the player in just to charge spares one at a time. Proprietary batteries are expensi've, while AA or AAA nimh rechargeables are often around $0 or so for 4(for the higher capacity ones. Slightly lower capacity ones are even cheaper).

"8. A Built-In USB Port The only two players that I have seen like this are the iPod Shuffle and the Zen Nano/Nano Plus. This is a great benefit to me in the fact that I don't need any cables or anything. Literally nothing else. Just the player itself. All I have to do is plug it in and that's it. No carrying around anything else if I want music from someone's computer. So easy and convenient...."
I prefer having a smaller player that uses a cable to connect.

Setting my display size to "Best for Retina Display" creates a host of problems.

When I go into System Preferences>Displays>Set Best for Retina Displays, my typical web pages are scaled a bit too large to fit on the screen and I'm constanty having to scroll left/right to all the information. On top of that, if I click on a link, e.g., click on YouTube video, the resulting screen is shrunk to occupy only a small portion of the screen, and is much too small to read/view. This is a new phenomenon and hasn't always been this way. Any ideas?

Which os version are you using?
Does this happen in all browsers?
You are still under warranty. Call Apple Care and get your monies worth before it runs out.

Single Record Form: fields display with the wrong width

I'm laying out fields on a single record form and notice that the width of the fields displayed when I run the form is less than the width I specify on the "Edit Page Item" page. Here are 3 examples:
field 1: Display as=text, Width=100, Maximum Width=100, ==> displayed width=76
field 2: Display as=text, Width=50, Maximum Width=50, ==> displayed width=46
field 3: Display as=textarea Width=100 Maximum Width=100 ==> displayed width=100
Anyone know why this is happening? I'm trying to layout the form so that it has a pleasing look. It's hard to get the fields lined up when they don't display according to the widths specified.
Edited by: Corvette Captain on Aug 9, 2012 3:21 PM

Hi,
>
I'm laying out fields on a single record form and notice that the width of the fields displayed when I run the form is less than the width I specify on the "Edit Page Item" page. Here are 3 examples:
field 1: Display as=text, Width=100, Maximum Width=100, ==> displayed width=76
field 2: Display as=text, Width=50, Maximum Width=50, ==> displayed width=46
field 3: Display as=textarea Width=100 Maximum Width=100 ==> displayed width=100
Anyone know why this is happening? I'm trying to layout the form so that it has a pleasing look. It's hard to get the fields lined up when they don't display according to the widths specified.
>
Setting the Width of the Page Item sets the input elements "size" attribute. HTML rendering based on size attribute is not a precise as you need. You should use CSS for precision. See Compatibility Notes
Cheers,

Input text field displays U.S. keyboard layout

Hi,
I've got a Flash Player 9 / AS3 animation which has a input
text field where a user enters their email address.
Now my PC is setup to use the UK keyboard layout so when I
click the buttons Shift+@ then I get the @ symbol displayed.
But for some reason the moment I try typing in the @ symbol
(using Shift+@ keys) then up pops the " symbol which is a U.S.
keyboard layout if I'm not mistaken?
And so checking this, if I use the Shift+number 2(") key then
I get the @ symbol (which again is a U.S. keyboard layout if I'm
not mistaken?).
Obviously I can't expect my UK users to know this and so need
to work out how to change the keyboard layout for the text input
fields so when I click the shortcut buttons Shift+@ I should see
the @ symbol appear.
Hope that all makes sense.
Any help is greatly appreciated as this is a live project
that the client is racing to get fixed.
Many thanks and kind regards,
Mark

Hi,
I have found some other weird things happening regarding this
issue which are very odd?
To recap....
If I type into the search bar at the top of this page Shift+@
then I get the correct character displayed which is @ (so my
keyboard is definitely UK layout).
If I create a new Flash movie with nothing but a text field
set to INPUT and type Shift+@ then again I get the correct
character!
But if I type Shift+@ into my Flash movie I get the wrong
character " appear!?
I then checked both text fields and found there were
absolutely no differences (except for colour/font size), so I
copied the new text field into my Flash movie and the moment I
played my Flash movie the new text field (which was working) then
started doing the same and displaying the wrong character???
Any ideas?
Thanks.
Kind regards,
Mark

Text Field layout/size issues

Has anyone else noticed that when you add a text field component onto a layout, the view of it inside of JSC2 is not how it appears in browser? For example, I am staring at a JSC2 screen where the bottom of the line of text(label) aligns with the bottom of the text-field. However, once in the browser, the text field is a good amount larger (reader below) the label's bottom. From exploring, it seems like the text-field gains an extra grid size when translated from JSC2 to web. (My grid is set to 5 px, and the text-field only aligns once I make it 1 grid space too small). Is this the case? Possibly known bug, and is there any solution other then just make all of the text fields too small?
Thanks

I have a similar problem, and I think it is a bug to. The IDE display of a text field is about two times the size of the actual size of the text field displayed in the browser. I tried both IE 6.0 and Firefox and the result is the same, so it is not a browser specific issue.
I have to set the columns attribute of the text field almost twice as big big in the IDE display to get half as much in the browser. Overall it is irritating since my design view looks like my text fields are over lapping other components when that is actually not the case when I deploy it.

ML81N Make FM fields display only in account assignment

Requirement is to make FM fields already derived from PO (derivation working correctly) display only or add an error message. Easy I thought just go to config for SES and click on Additional Fields display only (Cost Center?, WBS element? there was no funds management fields available)...then after some time investigating
Have debugged the transaction and found some possibilities.
(1) BADI TR_GET_ACCNT_ASSIGN called in function FM_ACCOUNT_GET_COBL from MS_ACCOUNT_ASSIGNMENT.
(2) User Exit EXIT_SAPLFMCH_001 called in function FM_CHANGE_AA_SUBST
(3) Use FMDERIVE to somehow check the PO derivation
Just wondered if anyone had taken this further before I spend a lot more time understanding the whole process in order to achieve a small bit. Please I am a technical resource not FM specialist.
If I could understand the process flow, at least it might help me make quickest simplest solution.
thanks,

Hi,
You can customize the field status in tx OME9 for the relevant account assignment category.
But be aware that this customizing will be valid for all purchasing documents and transactions - not only for ML81N and the services area.
During SES postings, inheriting the FM account assignment from the reference PO is the standard and expected behaviour, so you may see that FMDERIVE is not called when the PO reduction is to be posted during ML81N. Instead, the FMAA is read from table FMIOI and fmderive is skipped in those lines (fi transaction keys KBS/WRX, for instance).
I hope this will help you
Kind regards
Mar

9.1 UI Customization for Field Display Size

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for