A Issue in MFBF

I'm getting below message in t.code: MFBF for one material.
"No standard cost estimate available for the material"- I'm getting this message in MFBF for one scenario (REM)
After this message, i executed CK11N as well as CK24 also. but still same issue continues
(Note: I have maintained Std price (S) -Rs100 for this matl in MM01 Accounting 1 view)
Please help me to fix this issue. Thanks in Advance

Dear "A P from Accenture",
1.Execute CK40N for all the steps from step 1 to 5 from Material assignment to Release.
2.Or else Execute CK11N,save without any error and then mark and release using CK24.
3.Ensure this value gets update against under Current column and planned price in Costing 2 view.
Check and revert
Regards
S Mangalraj

Similar Messages

Consignment reversal from MFBF

Hi Guru's,
Please help.
Problem: In REM while doing good issue using MFBF transcation for consignment material system posting correctly with stock type K. But during reversal using MFBF Document neutral reversal tab system not put in back the consignment stock to the original consigenment place instead it is placing back to own stock.
Thx
Sathiya

Document neutral reversal
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/12/db12aac30311d1b59b0000e82d81c3/frameset.htm
You can use this function to reverse already backflushed quantities and activities.
Whereas document-specific reversal only allows you to reverse the complete quantity and activities contained in a backflush document, you can use the document-neutral reversal to partly reverse a backflush.
Document-neutral reversal is particularly useful if you separate the backflushing processes. When the backflushing processes are separated, all references to the original document are lost. Therefore, you have to reverse without referencing the document.
Since there's no connection with the original posting you cannot expect the system to find out (from nowhere) what to do. If ou want to post the goods back to their original stock segment you have to use "Document specific cancellation" function.
Regards,
Csaba

Reason code in MFBF

Hi ,
The actual quantities to be issued in MFBF changes due to some reason. Can we capture the reson for the qty change from planned to actual?
In MIGO it is available , can we incorporate it in MFBF.
Regards
ShankarR

Dear Sankar,
In standard SAP it is not possible to capture the reason code,only by some enhancement we can capture
this reason code during MFBF.
Regards
S Mangalraj

Serial number during GI posting REM scenario

HELLO ALL,
We are having repetitive manufacturing scenario, we want serial numbers to be entered during goods issue posting (MFBF tranaction), please suggest what should be done.
I have configured in OIS2 and serialisation attributes for movement types for procedure MMSL with movement types 261 & 131.
When I do production booking through MFBF, system is asking for header material serial number however it is not asking the serial number for components for which serilization procedure is set as mandatory.
Moreover system is giving the error message "Message no. IO304"
Only 0 serial numbers entered instead of 1
Message no. IO304
Diagnosis
There is a serial number obligation, so the number of serial numbers must equal the number of serial numbers in the material document.
You can post the operation only if you entered the correct number of serial numbers previously.
System Response
Depending on the context in which the error arises, the system continues processing, or the required function cannot be performed.
Procedure
You have the following options, for example:
Check that the serial numbers are entered fully.
If necessary, display an error log.
If necessary, contact your system administrator.
please suggest how to enter serial numbers when posting the GI for components.
Thanks.
Kumar

Hi
Please read the following
Like production orders the serial number are not maintained to orders. The serial numbers are created prior
to backflush (MFBF) with IQ01 or IQ04. The documented goods movement posted along with serial number
at the backflush posting. Also in case of backflush reversal system reveres the status from AVLB to ESTO.
Serial number management is effective way of inventory monitoring and tracking. It is advisable to use in
sectors like consumer electronics, automobiles, and assembly units. Apart from inventory it is also useful in
after sales customer services where warranty plays important role.
Also you can create serial number during Goods receipt of Purchase order for component parts need to have seperate
z-program for this .
Regards,
Jaya Vimal

GI(Goods Issue) for serialized component in mfbf transaction

In transaction MFBF when we press save after entering planned order and backfluish quantity it asks for serial numbers for the main component but if there are serialized componets in compoents tab it throws error on saving ,the requirement form my customer is like that if there is a serialized component in component list its pop up should come and asking for serial numbers and its GI should happen

hi santhosh
kindly check the order type .i think you are using MB1A for refurbishment process.but it is not possible.only maintenance order can be posted via MB1A
follow the procedure for goods issue in refurbishment order.
Choose Logistics ® Plant maintenance ® Maintenance processing ® Completion confirmation ® Goods movement ® Goods movement.
The entry screen for a goods issue appears.
Choose the pushbutton For order.
Enter the relevant order number in the dialog box and choose Continue.
An entry screen appears.
Choose Copy.
The Maintain Serial Numbers dialog box appears.
Choose Reference document.
Enter the order number in the Refurbishment order group box and choose Execute.
A list appears with the planned serial numbers for the refurbishment order.
Check the selections of serial numbers, for whose material you want to post a goods issue, and choose Copy.
The serial numbers are copied into the Maintain Serial Numbers dialog box.
Choose Exit window.
The goods issue is posted.
regards
thyagarajan

How to execute 261 goods issue for REM order items other than with MFBF?

Our users are looking for an easy way to post a 261 goods issue for a single component of a repetitive manufacturing order without using the MFBF transaction where they have to deselect all other components of the order.
The ideal situation would be to use a transaction similar to MB1C or MB11 to simply enter the planned REM order, component material id, and its respective quantitiy and then post.
Any information you can provide will be helpful.

Strat,
Thank you for your response but LT01 does not seem to provide the functionality that I am looking for.
To clarify, our users would like to complete a 261 movement for a single component within a particular repetitive manufacturing, without going into the MFBF transaction and having to deselect all of the unnecessary components just to single out one.
So ideally we would like to use the MB1C transaction for a 261 movement. Enter in a REM order, the material id, and the quantity to be issued and simply post a single material. Currently when we attempt to do this with MB1C we receive the error M7162 that our order, which is a product cost collector, cannot be processed with this transaction.
Hope this helps clear it up and thanks again for your response.
- Nick

MFBF- Costing Issue

Dear Friends,
I have one issue reg. costing in MFBF.When do yield / scrap posting in MFBF , in post with correction screen we remove some of the components which are not consumed especially in case of scrap posting of assembly but system will consider assembly cost i.e. cost of header material as per std cost estimate only considering all components.Is there any way by which we can get the actual cost as per component consumption in MFBF?
Awaiting your valuable inputs in this matter.
Thanks & Regards,
Tejas

Dear Tejas,
This is not possible.
First let me clear one thing from your side,you are saying 10 components are required for making a
product.
Does it mean 10 quantity of a component or 10 different components?
IF its going to be 10 different component's means,then there is no meaning in taking the costing run.
This is because you are not certain about how the product is going to be produced,sometime it may
happen by consuming all the 10 components and sometime it may be consuming 8 out of the 10
different components.
now case1 I hope you are suing standard cost estimate for backflushing the datas,so the system
considers the std cost of the product while backflushing.
Still your query is not clear.
Please clarify my above doubts.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

MFBF and MF47 Issue ...

Hello Dears,
Issue 1 : When i try to do MFBF facing the error “Changed rem profile regarding generation of post processing records” but with help of the technical team i bypassed the error through debug and back flush the quantity, after daily scheduled batch job backflushed all remaining quantity. How to avoid this problem in future?
Issue 2: In same material when i checked the MF47 i seen one component records. When i try to do reprocess or delete the records from MF47 i facing the same error “Changed rem profile regarding generation of post processing records” and when i checked the MD04 for this components enough stock is available and one Nproc status in MRP element for same quantity which mention in MF47. How to i remove this records from the MF47?
The REM Profile has not been changed. It is the same profile that is being used for all backflushing for that plant. Other materials are able to backflush without issue on that line and the same REM Profile are assigned to them all.
It's very high priority issue due to month end, Please help me.
Thanks & Regards
Umesh Mali

Hello Dears,
For above issue, I created one more REM profile in system. In new REM profile 'YY' we changed the "Error correction for backflushing" in tab 1(OSP2): select only cumulated postprocessing records, where exiting REM profile 'XX' in material master has both Cumulated and individual postprocessing records selected. We changed REM profile in material master and select the new REM profile 'YY'. After change REM profile in material master system allowed to do MF47 and MFBF, Nproc also removed from the MD04 screen for companets. Once completed both process, we again change the REM profile and select the exiting one REM profile 'XX' in Material master and system working fine.
Thanks everyone for your valuable suggestion
Thanks & Regards
Umesh Mali

MFBF -Max no.of FI items reached -issue

hi,
While doing production posting through the transaction code MFBF
the following error is encountered
"Maxium no.of FI items are reached "
the error description is as below
what to be done , please provide inputs ?
Maximum number of items in FI reached
Message no. F5727
Diagnosis
The maximum number of items for an FI document ('999') has been exceeded.
System Response
FI documents have a 3-digit item counter that limits the number of items permitted per document.
Procedure
If the documents with an excessive number of items come from another application area (e.g. sales, logistics, order accounting), you can configure the system to the effect that these documents are summarized in FI.
madhu kiran

HI,
If you are using New GL and want to summarise on PRCTR or KOSTL system will not allow as the table FAGLFLEXT effects and other feilds are not relevant for summrisation.
The only way is to make the document reduced to less than 999 line items.
Sarma

MFBF - issue with Planned quantity graeter than Backflush quantity

Hi Experts,
In MFBF, I am getting warning message no. RM124 - 'backflush qty > planned order qty'. I want to convert this message into Error Mesasge. How to convert this warning message into error message?
The background is the backflush quantity field in MFBF is enabled,so you can make any changes as possible with the quantity.For instance,in MTS,it allows you to post with out warning whereas in MTO it does allow but with warning.I feel this is a generic problem in MFBF transaction.There must be some note on this....
Am aware of the BADI ' BAdI RM_BFLUSH_GOODSMVT ' am not interested in this BADI....................*is there any SAP note avail on this ?Though i did checked in portal but not successful.
Any inputs would be highly appreciated.Points assured.
Best Regards
Afroz

HI
Check SAP notes 527715 and 489898
Hope it will help u
Regards
Anupam Sharma

MFBF-Reversal with movement type 102 issue

Hello All,
To wipe off my production which mistakenly done earlier ( MFBF, 101 Movement Type) I have done MFBF for component with the movement type 102. The quantity got reversed. When I done MFBF 101 Mov. Typ, the material document was generated and it supposed like to be.
But to reverse that production quantity, when I done MFBF 101 mov typ, the material document has not been generated.
When I see the MB51 for that code for the posting date, it shows me both the entries, i.e. goods receipt and goods reversal (101 and 102 movement type). For 101 I see the material document number but for the entry 102 under document number it shows "not actually produced" instead of number.
Can anybody please let me know the reason why document number has not been generated during reversal and why MB51 behaving like this?
Thanks

Hi Anupam,
I have tried that way also, MF12 doesnt have dacument.
In MB51, for 102 movement type the value for Document field column is not actually produced, means the document has not been generated, and for 101 movemet type value for Document field column is 450328225.
Please tell what will be the reason that material document is not generated. What step I missed during reversal.
Thank you.
Edited by: Deven on Aug 18, 2010 6:11 PM
Edited by: Deven on Aug 18, 2010 6:12 PM

Unit of issue in COGI

Hi Experts,
I have unit of issue (in BOM and Matl Master) which is Alt UOM, different from Base unit of measure. While doing MFBF, I am getting qty of component in Alt UOM but actually system is withdrawing components in Base Unit of measure only. This is resulting in postprocessing records - COGI in base UOM. What should I do so that system will issue component in Alt UOM.
Thanks
Suresh

Dear,
Do not worry about unot of measure...system will issue the material in the unit you have maintained in BOM. More over whatever the unit you have enetered, systme will calculate the alternate unit qty and updates the stock. Usually MMBE shoews the stock in all units...but material is valuated w.r.t base unit of measure. Hence system willcalcuate the al unit and updates FI documents to updating the stock.
Hence system will calculate the unit conversion you maintained in material master
Can we know what problem you are facing in post processing?

GOODSMVT_CODE - MFBF tcode

Hi Experts;
I want to use BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE bapi for MFBF Tcode process.
But I dont know assing to GOODSMVT_CODE which number for MFBF.
Which code assign to GOODSMVT_CODE?
GOODSMVT_CODE
01 - MB01 - Goods Receipts for Purchase Order
02 - MB31 - Goods Receipts for Prod Order
03 - MB1A - Goods Issue
04 - MB1B - Transfer Posting
05 - MB1C - Enter Other Goods Receipt
06 - MB11
Thanks.

Hi,
I had used the following code 2 years ago. I don't remember why I have switched from '01' to '06'. It may help you:
tables lips.
Structures for GOODS MVT BAPI
data: gm_header type bapi2017_gm_head_01,
gm_code type bapi2017_gm_code,
gm_headret type bapi2017_gm_head_ret,
gm_item type table of bapi2017_gm_item_create with header line,
gm_return type bapiret2 occurs 0 with header line,
gm_retmtd type bapi2017_gm_head_ret-mat_doc.
clear: gm_return, gm_retmtd.
clear gm_item. refresh gm_item.
refresh gm_return.
gm_code-gm_code = '01'.
gm_code-gm_code = '06'.
gm_header-pstng_date = sy-datum.
gm_header-doc_date = sy-datum.
select single bosurunkodu
    from zsdbt011
    into bosurunkodu
    where werks = bayikodu.
if sy-subrc = 0.
    select single *
      from lips
      where vbeln = p_teslimat_no.
    gm_item-move_type = '511'.
    gm_item-material   = bosurunkodu.
    gm_item-entry_qnt = lips-lfimg.
    gm_item-entry_uom = lips-meins.
    gm_item-plant    = bayikodu.
    gm_item-stge_loc   = '0001'.
    append gm_item.
endif.
data material_doc_message(255).
clear gm_retmtd.
clear gm_return.
refresh gm_return.
call function 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
    exporting
      goodsmvt_header = gm_header
      goodsmvt_code    = gm_code
    importing
      goodsmvt_headret = gm_headret
      materialdocument = gm_retmtd
    tables
      goodsmvt_item    = gm_item
      return           = gm_return.
if gm_retmtd is not initial.
    call function 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      exporting
        wait = 'X'.
endif.

Run time error COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW coming at MFBF

Hi Guru's
User is getting runtime error at MFBF as below:
Runtime Errors COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW
Exception CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW
This coming at production but not coming at test server.
when user is trying to enter quantity 66059 there is error coming but when he enter quantiy as 6095 there is no dump.
Please suggest any solution to avoid and also suggest sap Notes if there is any available.
Thanks in advance,
regards,
Nilesh I

Hi,
I can see that there are several SAP notes regarding this issue, you just need to check their symptons and if they are valid for your SAP_APPL release and support package.
Here are the SAP notes:
- 1295055: Product cost collector: Field AFPO-WEMNG set incorrectly
- 964308: COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW in CKMO_GET_ORD_HIST_NETWR_MMIM
I hope they help you.
Regards,
Marcelo

Issue with Backflush when Consuming Fractions

I am having an issue with back-flushing I was hoping Guru's could help me .
Here is the issue:
In the BOM for every 1 EA of X(Parent) we need .025 EA of Y(Child)
The parent part is X. Using CS03 and typing in a quantity of 20 pcs everything looks perfect. I would consume component Y .500 of a sheet.
If you review MFBF for 20 pcs. of X it wants to consume 1.00 of Y. (1 whole sheet instead of .5)
I know I could put a rounding value of 40 on the X to fix this but that would not be an option for this particular process. Measurements of each of these is not exactly the same and very critical.
Is there an issue with SAP consuming fractions? It seems to round up to 1 whole sheet when it should only consume .500 of a sheet. Do you know of a way to fix this?
Any info would be greatly appreciated
Thanks,
Safi

For some reason which is unknown for me, this topic is very hard to manage within SAP.
We face exactly the same issue producing Tanks from steel sheets.
Base Unit of Measure was EA for Sheets . SO, we create a copy of EA called ED (each with decimals) , allowing up to three decimals and assign it as an alternate UoM to the material. In Bom, we had, for instance, 3.6 ED to produce a tank.
But, in reservations the quantities are stored as Base Unit of measure and without decimals, regardless the fact that you a have an alternative UoM , etc etc.
So, if you consume the component based on MIGO and reservations, SAP will propose 4 EA (o 4 ED ! which is even stranger - because of double conversion between base and alternative UoM) . If you consume by backflush, you dont even realise that the GI is being carried out in that way.
We are still waiting for some solution after we sent a message, describing the issue. It is advisable to search the SAP Notes to see if there is some solution .
So far, alternative UoM is not the solution.
You must change the base unit of measure to ED or have some manual procedure of checking the quantities.
Of course, EA can be redefined with decimal parts, also, but this normally can lead to some other problems (other parts managed striclty in EA, i. e. a tank, could be managed in fractions, 0.75 of a tank !!! etc. )

A Issue in MFBF

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for