A Manual for Muse ... by any chance

Question

I've just downloaded the trial version of Muse. It looks like it might be a great program BUT ... if Adobe can't be bothered to produce a manual then I'm not interested. If creating a good manual -- something Adobe has generally been excellent with -- is too much trouble, then forget getting me as a cloud customer. I'm running a business and don't have time to spend hours looking at videos or searching for the "how to". With a good manual you can find out how, for example, to insert an image in a couple of minutes. ... BUT, can't see how to do that in Muse ... can't even see how to add a text block.
Sorry, Adobe ... if it's too much trouble to produce a decent manual you're showing all the signs of going down the path of monopolistic IT companies and just sticking the finger up at your customers.
It's bad enough that you price gouge your Australian customers ... for NO GOOD REASON ... but now you are just insulting ALL your customers.

Answer 1

Fair point, IanDK
It's true that producing a manual of Adobe's usual thoroughness and quality would be challenging while still developing the product; however, something relatively simple to help a novice would have been nice. Time is the issue predominantly: watching videos and searching for tutorials takes far more time than quickly referring to a well-constructed manual.
Buying a book at this stage isn't really the answer as I'm trying to trial the product. After two challenging years financially, spending money before being assured some value from the expenditure isn't an option at the moment.
I think I had some simmering reaction to the revelation of just how much more we pay for Adobe products in Australia. You might not be aware that Adobe's CEO along with those from other US companies (Apple, Microsoft) were called before our government to explain why the products are so much more expensive here. In the old days of shipping them out by sailboat, there might have been an excuse (e.g. freight, threat of pirates at sea, etc.), but in the days of download it seems the higher prices here are simply because they can charge them. It's discriminatory (i.e. it makes it harder for us to compete financially) and in plain human terms it just doesn't seem like a nice thing to do. (But, when did any large company set out to be nice?)
So, I'm not sure what an "entitled threat" is, but maybe I've answered your concerns more moderately. We do pay more here, and the annoyance of that perhaps led to the use of some intemperate language.
I have to add though, that I've always been and, so far, remain a great champion for Adobe products (if not always for the way the company operates). I regularly try to point out to clients how much simpler layout work is in InDesign, for example, than in a certain well-known word processer application.