A opção navegação in private não aparece listada como a recupero?

No menú Ferramentas não aparece listada a opção Navegação In Private, desapareceu desde a última atualização. Como a recupero?

Hello SusanaPires, the private browsing mode moved in the 20.0 version, go from Firefox button and select New Private Window.
see for more info : [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/private-browsing-browse-web-without-saving-info#w_how-do-i-open-a-new-private-window How do I open a new Private Window?]
thank you

Similar Messages

  • Barra de Navegação cinza e preta encobrindo o link, como resolver?

    Instalei o Kubuntu 14.04 e, após a atualização do sistema, na barra de navegação do Firefox os links ficam encobertos pelas cores cina e preto, impedindo a leitura e atrapalhando a navegação.
    Mudei o esquema de cores padrão do sistema, e alterei o tema Gtk mas não resolveu.
    Desinstalei e reinstalei o Firefox mas o problema persiste.
    O que pode ser feito?

    Hmmm,
    # Na [[Location bar autocomplete|barra de endereços]], escreva '''about:config''' e pressione '''Enter'''. É possível que o aviso ''''Isso pode anular a garantia!'''' apareça.
    # Clique no botão '''Serei cuidadoso, prometo!''', para acessar a página about:config.
    # Procure por '''gfx.xrender.enabled''' e mude seu valor para '''false'''.
    # Reinicie o Firefox.
    Ou tente user o Tema [https://addons.mozilla.org/pt-br/firefox/addon/fxchrome/ FXChrome]

  • Su perfil firefox no puede cargarse. puede estar faltando o ser inaccesible

    Estimados, me a aparecido ese error que esta en el titulo y si he probado todos los metodos para solucionarlo y ninguno me funciona 100% por ejemplo el de cambiar el perfil abre firefox pero no me deja navegar asi que lo unico que puedo hacer es reiniciar el equipo y puedo navegar sin problemas hasta que se cae nuevamente.
    El equipo esta recien formateado y me ha pasado con windows 8 y 8.1 (los 2 son Single Lenguaje x64 y Originales).
    El problema encuentro que aparecio con la actualizacion del 36.0 ya que termina de instalarse abre firefox navegas y despues de 5 min aparece el mensaje de que firefox.exe quiere accesos para firewall de windows uno le da aceptar y se cae el internet y empieza de nuevo el problema.
    ojala tengan una pronta solucion por que es el unico navegador que me acomoda bastante (igual estoy escaneando el equipo en caso de malware aunque lo dudo si esta recien formateado.)

    Hola<!-- quizás quieras editar este saludo y cualquier otra parte de la respuesta para que sea más personalizada y adaptada a la pregunta.-->,
    Algunos problemas de Firefox pueden solucionarse si se realiza una "reinstalación limpia". Esto significa que se eliminan los archivos de programa de Firefox y después se reinstala el programa. Estos son los pasos a seguir:
    '''Nota:''' Quizá debas imprimir o visualizar estos pasos en otro navegador.
    #Descarga la última versión de escritorio de Firefox desde [https://www.mozilla.org mozilla.org] (o elige el instalador para tu sistema operativo e idioma en [https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/all/ esta página]) y guarda el archivo de instalación en tu ordenador.
    #Cuando finalice la descarga, cierra todas las ventanas de Firefox (o abre el menú de Firefox [[Image:New Fx Menu]] y haz clic en el botón de Salir de Firefox [[Image:Close 29]]).
    #Elimina la carpeta de instalación de Firefox que por defecto se encuentra en una de las siguiente rutas:
    #*'''Windows:'''
    #**C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
    #**C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
    #*'''Mac:''' Elimina Firefox del directorio de Aplicaciones.
    #*'''Linux:''' Si instalaste Firefox con el gestor de paquetes propio de tu distribución, deberías usar la misma fórmula para desinstalarlo (consulta [[Installing Firefox on Linux]]). Si descargaste e instalaste el paquete binario desde la [http://www.mozilla.org/es-ES/firefox/new/#desktop página de descarga de Firefox], simplemente elimina la carpeta ''firefox'' de tu directorio de inicio.
    #A continuación, procede a reinstalar Firefox:
    ##Haz doble clic sobre el archivo de instalación y sigue los pasos que se indican en el asistente.
    ##Cuando el asistente finalice, elige iniciar Firefox directamente cuando pulses el botón de Finalizar.
    Si quieres más información sobre cómo volver a instalar Firefox, accede a [[Troubleshoot and diagnose Firefox problems#w_5-reinstall-firefox|este enlace]].
    <b>ADVERTENCIA:</b> No ejecutes un instalador de terceros en este proceso: podría eliminar permanentemente todos los datos de tu [[Profiles|perfil de Firefox]], incluidas las extensiones, caché, cookies, marcadores, configuración personal y contraseñas guardadas, entre otros. <u>¡Nada de esto podrá recuperarse a menos que hayas hecho una copia de seguridad en un dispositivo externo!</u> Consulta el artículo [[Back up and restore information in Firefox profiles]].
    Vuelve a escribirnos para ver que sepamos si te ha sido de ayuda.
    ¡Gracias!

  • Como desintalar a navegaçao privativa?

    como faço p desisnstalar essa opção? nao consigo entrar no meu facebook, a senha nunca é aceita, obrigada

    Para desativar a navegação privativa:
    *[https://addons.mozilla.org/pt-br/firefox/addon/disable-private-browsing Disable Private Browsing]
    Mas não acredito que o fato de você não conseguir acessar o Facebook seja por conta disso, quando tenta acessar apenas é informado de que a senha esta incorreta?
    Tente limpar os cookie e o cache:
    #Clique no menu [[Image:New Fx Menu]], depois em histórico e finalmente em "Limpar histórico recente...".
    #Em "Limpar este período", selecione "Tudo".
    #Agora, clique na flecha próxima ao botão Detalhes para mostrar mais opções.
    #Na lista de detalhes, marque a opção ''Cache'' e ''Cookies'' e desmarque todas as outras opções.
    #Agora clique no botão ''Limpar Agora''.
    Mais informações podem ser encontradas no artigo [[Delete browsing, search and download history on Firefox]].

  • SSL private key password

    Hello everyone,
    I'm trying to upgrade a WLS 6.1 SP2 with WLP 4.0 SP2 instance to WLS 7.0 SP2
    with WLP 7.0 SP2. Everythng is fine except for that we cannot use the same
    SSL certificate. By defaul the private key is not encrypted with password
    (SSL.KeyEncrypted = false by default, according to the documentations) in
    both WLS 6.1 and WLS 7.0. But running WLS 7.0 startup script results the
    following error:
    <Sep 17, 2003 5:06:40 PM HST> <Alert> <WebLogicServer> <000297>
    <Inconsistent se
    curity configuration, java.lang.Exception: Cannot read private key from file
    C:\
    bea7\user_projects\agencyPortal\portal_islandinsurance_com-key.der. Make
    sure pa
    ssword specified in environment property weblogic.management.pkpassword is
    valid
    .>
    java.lang.Exception: Cannot read private key from file
    C:\bea7\user_projects\age
    ncyPortal\portal_islandinsurance_com-key.der. Make sure password specified
    in en
    vironment property weblogic.management.pkpassword is valid.
    at
    weblogic.security.service.SSLManager.getServerPrivateKey(SSLManager.j
    ava:434)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.SSLListenThread.<init>(SSLListenThread.java:153)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.SSLListenThread.<init>(SSLListenThread.java:122)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.initializeListenThreads(T3Srvr.java:1513)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.resume(T3Srvr.java:852)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.run(T3Srvr.java:295)
    at weblogic.Server.main(Server.java:32)
    Is this happening because the private key is actually encrypted with the
    password? It was working, although the KeyEncrypted is not set to true and
    the startup script for WLS 6.1 instance did have a line
    with -Dweblogic.management.pkpassword. Or could this error be result of
    something else? The physical machine the instances are located is the same
    and IP address and the DNS entry hasn't been changed, either.
    Any insight will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
    Makoto

    Thanks Tony - it worked!!
    "Tony" <TonyV> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    It may be because the private key is both unprotected and in DER format.
    There are some things to try:
    1) Convert the private key file from a DER file to a PEM file and try
    that:
    a) Follow the for converting an unprotected private key at:
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/adminguide/utils.html#1143743
    b) Look at the resulting PEM file, it should look something like
    this:
    -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
    -----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
    (Be sure there is no extra lines or whitespace after thefooter)
    >
    c) Change your configuration to point at the PEM file
    If that doesn work, then you can try protecting the key with apassword
    using
    the wlkeytool utility (It should be in the server/bin directory). The
    tool should prompt
    for a password to use to protect it:
    wlkeytool inputkey.pem outputkey.pem
    Then change your configuration to use the protected private key, andset
    the passwod to use.
    Tony
    "Makoto Suzuki" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    Hello everyone,
    I'm trying to upgrade a WLS 6.1 SP2 with WLP 4.0 SP2 instance to WLS 7.0SP2
    with WLP 7.0 SP2. Everythng is fine except for that we cannot use the
    same
    SSL certificate. By defaul the private key is not encrypted withpassword
    (SSL.KeyEncrypted = false by default, according to the documentations)in
    both WLS 6.1 and WLS 7.0. But running WLS 7.0 startup script resultsthe
    following error:
    <Sep 17, 2003 5:06:40 PM HST> <Alert> <WebLogicServer> <000297>
    <Inconsistent se
    curity configuration, java.lang.Exception: Cannot read private key fromfile
    C:\
    bea7\user_projects\agencyPortal\portal_islandinsurance_com-key.der. Make
    sure pa
    ssword specified in environment property weblogic.management.pkpassword
    is
    valid
    .>
    java.lang.Exception: Cannot read private key from file
    C:\bea7\user_projects\age
    ncyPortal\portal_islandinsurance_com-key.der. Make sure passwordspecified
    in en
    vironment property weblogic.management.pkpassword is valid.
    at
    weblogic.security.service.SSLManager.getServerPrivateKey(SSLManager.j
    ava:434)
    atweblogic.t3.srvr.SSLListenThread.<init>(SSLListenThread.java:153)
    atweblogic.t3.srvr.SSLListenThread.<init>(SSLListenThread.java:122)
    atweblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.initializeListenThreads(T3Srvr.java:1513)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.resume(T3Srvr.java:852)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.run(T3Srvr.java:295)
    at weblogic.Server.main(Server.java:32)
    Is this happening because the private key is actually encrypted with the
    password? It was working, although the KeyEncrypted is not set to true
    and
    the startup script for WLS 6.1 instance did have a line
    with -Dweblogic.management.pkpassword. Or could this error be result of
    something else? The physical machine the instances are located is thesame
    and IP address and the DNS entry hasn't been changed, either.
    Any insight will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
    Makoto

  • I found My iPhone contacts on my friends Iphone we both have 4s! But we use the same apple ID and ICloud ID! How can undo what happened? all my private stuff is now on his phone!!! help me plz!!?

    I found My iPhone contacts on my friends Iphone we both have 4s! But we use the same apple ID and ICloud ID! How can undo what happened? all my private stuff is now on his phone!!! help me plz!!?

    Of course if you are both connected to the same iCloud account you have the same contacts - what did you expect?. The contacts live on the server and are read from there by the devices; so as you've both managed to sync your contacts up to iCloud they are now inextricably mixed. You can only delete your contacts by deleting individual ones, and doing that will delete them from your phone as well.
    You can only unravel this by
    1. In the iCloud contacts page at http://icloud.com, select all the contacts, click on the cogwheel icon at bottom left and choose 'Export vCard'.
    2. Sign out of System Preferences>iCloud
    3. Create a new Apple ID and open a new iCloud account with it for your own use.
    4. Import the vCard back into the iCloud contacts page.
    5. Go to http://icloud.com and sign in with the original ID. This is now his ID. Work through the contacts individually deleting the ones you don't want him to have. When done sign out and advise him to change his password.
    6. Go to the new iCloud account and delete his contacts individually.
    Of course if you have also been syncing calendars and using the same email address there are problems with doing this.

  • How to set up a wireless private bubble at paid hotspot? WTR54GS

    Hi,
    I have the WTR54GS travel router. Reading the manual I understand I can create a private wifi bubble with the WTR54GS to share a hot spot.
    From the manual:
    "You can also use multiple devices on a single hotspot account in a coffee shop or airport lounge and be protected with WPA Personal encryption or a powerful SPI firewall".
    I've successfully used the WTR54GS as an AP with the router connected by cable to a wired Internet source.
    But how do I set it up to receive one wifi signal then rebroadcast as a private "bubble" I don't see any specific settings in the setup or descriptions in the manual. Maybe it's easier than I think?
    If possible I'd like to be able to use a B wifi device (my PDA) at a place that's only broadcasting G.
    thanks.
    -Tony
    Message Edited by tony_vancouver on 02-23-2008 10:00 AM
    Message Edited by tony_vancouver on 02-23-2008 10:03 AM

    The WTR54GS (wireless travel router) is often confused with the WRT54GS (wireless router), because of their similar names.
    The WTR54GS (Travel Router) can accept an Internet connection from an ethernet cable or an unsecured wireless network.  This is set up using the very first item on the router's setup pages, namely "Incoming Internet type" which can be set to "wired" or "wireless".  The key thing here is that the WTR54GS cannot use an encrypted wireless system for its incoming Internet connection.
    It can then generate a secured (WEP, WPA, or WPA2) wireless LAN, under your own unique SSID, and you can connect several wireless computers to it.  (If you have a switch, you can also connect several wired computers to it.)
    If you are trying to use the router to share a single paid unsecured wireless connection, then it should work.  Be sure when you sign up that you use the router, so the service recognizes the router's MAC address (and not your computer's MAC address) as a "paid" user.
    If you are trying to use the router to provide security, this will not happen with this type of a "wireless network-to-wireless network" setup.  The reason for this is that all your transmissions ultimately are passed unencrypted between the WTR54GS and the hotel's wireless router.
    On the other hand, if you use a wired "Incoming Internet Connection", then the router works quite nicely at setting up a shared and secure wireless network.  ( This assumes that the wire you are using is secure. )
    By the way, your wireless b device should easily be able to connect to a wireless g network.
    Message Edited by toomanydonuts on 02-28-2008 04:18 PM

  • Multiple plugtmp-1 plugtmp-2 etc. in local\temp folder stay , crossdomain.xml and other files containing visited websitenames created while private browsing

    OS = Windows 7
    When I visit a site like youtube whith private browsing enabled and with the add-on named "shockwave flash" in firefox add-on list installed and activate the flashplayer by going to a video the following files are created in the folder C:\Users\MyUserName\AppData\Local\Temp\plugtmp-1
    plugin-crossdomain.xml
    plugin-strings-nl_NL-vflLqJ7vu.xlb
    The contents of plugin-crossdomain contain both the "youtube.com" adress as "s.ytimg.com" and is as follows:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM "http://www.macromedia.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd">
    -<cross-domain-policy> <allow-access-from domain="s.ytimg.com"/> <allow-access-from domain="*.youtube.com"/> </cross-domain-policy>
    The contents of the other file I will spare you cause I think those are less common when I visit other sites but I certainly don't trust the file. The crossdomain.xml I see when I visit most other flashpayer sites as well.
    I've also noticed multiple plugin-crossdomain-1.xml and onwards in numbers, I just clicked a youtube video to test, got 6 of them in my temp plus a file named "plugin-read2" (no more NL file cause I changed my country, don't know how youtube knows where I'm from, but that's another subject, don't like that either). I just noticed one with a different code:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    -<cross-domain-policy> <allow-access-from domain="*"/> </cross-domain-policy>
    So I guess this one comprimises my browsing history a bit less since it doesn't contain a webadress. If these files are even meant to be deposited in my local\temp folder. The bigger problem occurs when they stay there even after using private browsing, after clearing history, after clearing internet temporary files, cache, whatever you can think of. Which they do in my case, got more than 50 plugtmp-# folders in the previous mentioned local\temp folder containing all website names I visited in the last months. There are a variety of files in them, mostly ASP and XML, some just say file. I have yet to witness such a duplicate folder creation since I started checking my temp (perhaps when firefox crashes? I'd say I've had about 50 crashes in recent months).
    I started checking my temp because of the following Microsoft Security Essential warnings I received on 23-4-12:
    Exploit:Java/CVE-2010-0840.HE
    containerfile:C:\Users\Username\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache2196625541034777730.tmp
    file:C:\Users\Username\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache2196625541034777730.tmp->pong/reversi.class
    and...
    Exploit:Java/CVE-2008-5353.ZT
    containerfile:C:\Users\Noname\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache1028270176376464057.tmp
    file:C:\Users\Noname\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache1028270176376464057.tmp->Testability.class
    Microsoft Security Essentials informed me that these files were quarantained and deleted but when going to my temp file they were still there, I deleted them manually and began the great quest of finding out what the multiple gigabytes of other files and folders were doing in that temp folder and not being deleted with the usual clearing options within firefox (and IE).
    Note that I have set my adobe flasplayer settings to the most private intense I could think of while doing these tests (don't allow data storage for all websites, disable peer-to peer stuff, don't remember exactly anymore, etc.). I found it highly suspicious that i needed to change these settings online on an adobe website, is that correct? When right-clicking a video only limited privacy options are available which is why I tried the website thing.
    After the inital discovery of the java exploit (which was discovered by MSE shortly after I installed and started my first scan with Malwarebytes, which in turn made me suspicious whether I had even downloaded the right malwarebytes, but no indication in the filename if I google it). Malwarebytes found nothing, MSE found nothing after it said it removed the files, yet it didn't remove them, manually scanning these jar_cache files with both malwarevytes and MSE resulted in nothing. Just to be sure, I deleted them anyways like I said earlier. No new jar_cache files have been created, no exploits detected since then. CCleaner has cleaned most of my temp folder, I did the rest, am blocking all cookies (except for now shortly), noscript add-on has been running a while on my firefox (V 3.6.26) to block most javascripts except from sites like youtube. I've had almost the same problem using similar manual solutions a couple of months ago, and a couple of months before that (clearing all the multiple tmp folders, removing or renaming jar_cache manually, running various antmalware software, full scan not finding a thing afterwards, installing extra add-ons to increase my security, this time it's BetterPrivacy which I found through a mozilla firefox https connection, I hope, which showed me nicely how adobe flash was still storing LSO's even after setting all storage settings to 0 kb and such on the adobe website, enabling private browsing in firefox crushed those little trolls, but still plugtmp trolls are being created, help me crush them please, they confuse me when I'm looking for a real threat but I still want to use flash, IE doesn't need those folders and files, or does it store them somewhere else?).
    I'm sorry for the long story and many questions, hope it doesn't scare you away from helping me fight this. I suspect it's people wanting to belong to the hackergroup Anonymous who are doing this to my system and repeating their tricks (or the virus is still there, but I've done many antivirus scans with different programs so no need to suggest that option to me, they don't find it or I run into it after a while again, so far, have not seen jar_cache show up). Obviously, you may focus on the questions pertaining firefox and plugtmp folders, but if you can help me with any information regarding those exploits I would be extremely grateful, I've read alot but there isn't much specific information for checking where it comes from when all the anti-virus scanners don't detect anything anymore and don't block it incoming. I also have downloaded and installed process monitor but it crashes when I try to run it. The first time I tried to run it it lasted the longest, now it crashes after a few seconds, I just saw the number of events run up to almost a million and lots of cpu usage. When it crashed everything returned back to normal, or at least that's what I'm supposed to think I guess. I'll follow up on that one on their forum, but you can tell me if the program is ligit or not (it has a microsoft digital signature, or the name micosoft is used in that signature).

    update:
    I haven't upgraded my firefox yet because of a "TVU Web Player" plugin that isn't supported in the new firefox and I'm using it occasionally, couldn't find an upgrade for it. Most of my other plugins are upgraded in the green (according to mozilla websitechecker):
    Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U31 (green)
    Shockwave for Director (green - from Adobe I think)
    Shockwave Flash (green - why do I even need 2 of these adobe add-ons? can I remove one? I removed everything else i could find except the reader i think, I found AdobeARM and Adobe Acrobat several versions, very confusing with names constantly switching around)
    Java Deployment Toolkit 6.0.310.5 (green, grrr, again a second java, why do they do this stuff, to annoy people who are plagued with java and flash exploits? make it more complicating?)
    Adobe Acrobat (green, great, it's still there, well I guess this is the reader then)
    TVU Web Player for FireFox (grey - mentioned it already)
    Silverlight Plug-In (yellow - hardly use it, I think, unless it's automatic without my knowing, perhaps I watched one stream with it once, I'd like to remove it, but just in case I need it, don't remember why I didn't update, perhaps a conflict, perhaps because I don't use it, or it didn't report a threat like java and doesn't create unwantend and history compromising temp files)
    Google Update (grey - can I remove? what will i lose? don't remember installing it, and if I didn't, why didn't firefox block it?)
    Veetle TV Core (grey)
    Veetle TV Player (grey - using this for watching streams on veetle.com, probably needs the Core, deleted the broadcaster that was there earlier, never chose to install that, can't firefox regulate that when installing different components? or did i just miss that option and assumed I needed when I was installing veetle add-on?)
    Well, that's the list i get when checking on your site, when i use my own browseroptions to check add-ons I get a slightly different and longer list including a few I have already turned off (which also doesn't seem very secure to me, what's the point in using your site then for anything other than updates?), here are the differences in MY list:
    I can see 2 versions of Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U31, (thanks firefox for not being able to copy-paste this)
    one "Classic Java plug-in for Netscape and Mozilla"
    the other is "next generation plug-in for Mozilla browsers".
    I think I'll just turn off the Netscape and Mozilla one, don't trust it, why would I need 2? There I did it, no crashes, screw java :P
    There's also a Mozilla Default plugin listed there, why does firefox list it there without any further information whether I need it or not or whether it really originates from Mozilla firefox? It doesn't even show up when I use your website plugin checker, so is there no easy way by watching this list for me to determin I can skip worrying about it?
    There's also some old ones that I recently deactivated still listed like windows live photo gallery, never remember adding that one either or needing it for anything and as usual, right-clicking and "visit homepage" is greyed out, just as it is for the many java crap add-ons I encountered so far.
    Doing a quick check, the only homepage I can visit is the veetle one. The rest are greyed out. I also have several "Java Console" in my extentions tab, I deactivated all but the one with the highest number. Still no Java Console visible though, even after going to start/search "java", clicking java file and changing the settings there to "show" console instead of "hide" (can't remember exact details).
    There's some other extentions from noscript, TVU webplayer again, ADblock Plus and now also BetterPrivacy (sidenote, a default.LSO remains after cleanup correct? How do I know that one isn't doing anything nasty if it's code has been changed or is being changed? To prevent other LSO's I need to use both private browsing and change all kinds of restrictions online for adobe flashplayer, can anyone say absurd!!! if you think you're infected and want to improve your security? Sorry that rant was against Adobe, but it's really against Anonymous, no offense).

  • 'Error while signing data-Private key or certificate of signer not availabl

    Hello All,
    In my message mapping I need to call a web service to which I need to send a field value consist of SIGNED DATA.
    I am using SAP SSF API to read the certificate stored in NWA and Signing the Data as explained in
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a4/d0201854fb6a4cb9545892b49d4851/frameset.htm,
    when I have tested using Test tab of message mapping  it is working fine and I am able to access the certificate Keystore of NWA(we have created a keystore view and keystore entry to store the certificate) and generate the signed data ,but when I test end to end scenario from ECC system,it is getting failed in mapping with the error
    ' Error while signing data - Private key or certificate of signer not availableu2019.
    Appreciate your expert help to resolve this issue urgently please.
    Regards,
    Shivkumar

    Hi Shivkuar,
    Could you please let me know how you were trying to achieve the XML signature.
    We have a requirement where we have to sign the XML document and need to generate the target document as following structure.
    <Signature>
         <SignedInfo>
             <CanonicalizationMethod />
             <SignatureMethod />
             <Reference>
                     <Transforms>
                     <DigestMethod>
                     <DigestValue>
             </Reference>
        <Reference /> etc.
      </SignedInfo>
      <SignatureValue />
      <KeyInfo />
      <Object>ACTUAL PAYLOAD</Object>
    </Signature>
    I am analyzing the possibility of using the approach that is given in the help sap link that you have posted above. Any inputs will be apprecited.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sami.

  • Error in Creation of Private folder in Easy DMS

    Dear Friends,
    I got the following error while creating private folder for a new user.
    Folder Creation failed; check the logs under SLG1 Tx for more information.
    While checking SLG1 transaction in SAP I found the following info for the user:
    Identification
    Object________________ CIF (Core Interface Application Log Object)
    Subobject_____________ T_CLAF (Classification)
    External ID___________ 
    Log number____________ 00000000000003867077
    Created:
    Date__________________ 20100628
    Time__________________ 095056
    User__________________ DMS_USER4
    Transaction code______ 
    Program_______________ SAPLCIFG
    Operating mode________ D (Dialog processing)
    Status:
    Expiry date___________ 20100705
    Keep until expiry_____ 
    Processing status_____ 
    Regards,
    Sai Krishna

    Hi Sai,
    I hope that the documentation of the authorization object C_STUE_BER could be useful for you.
    This authorization object allows you to restrict maintenance of bills of material.
    The system checks this authorization when you call a transaction for maintaining bills of material. If the authorization group is changed while the BOM is being maintained, the system checks the authorization again.
    Defined fields
    The table below shows the fields and values of the authorization object.
    Fields          Possible         Description
    ACTVT            01               Create
    (Activity)        02               Change
                            03               Display
                            06               Delete
                            24               Create archive file
                            41               Delete from database
    STLTY              M              Material BOM
    (BOM cat.)        E              Equipment BOM
                              D              Document structure
                              K              Sales order BOM
                              S              Standard BOM
                              T              Functional location BOM
    STLAN   These values are defined in Customizing.
    (BOM usage)
    BEGRU        0000-ZZZZ      Used to make additional
    (Authorization                     restrictions on authorizations
    group)                                for maintaining individual BOMs
                                               (BOM header).
    In transaction SU56 you can also display the whole authorization of an user regarding its authorizations.
    Best regards,
    Christoph

  • Como apagar apenas um item do historico de navegação

    Olaaaaa... Gostaria de saber como posso apagar apenas um item do historico de navegação na internet.

    Experimente o complemento [https://addons.mozilla.org/pt-BR/firefox/addon/public-fox Public Fox] que trava as configurações do firefox usando senha.

  • I still cannot sign into eprint center despite everything, always an error with my private email

    address. i see that this has been a familiar and very frustrating issue for many. i read that i am not suppose to sign in with the printer email address so I don't know what to do. I registered it with private email, somewhere along the line i think it was switched to default but who knows. Regardless, it won't let me set up an account with my private email because its "in use". well yes its mine but its not "in use" for sure. I have read so much last night and now more hours tonight. I do know that we are not suppose to use the random printer email address to sign in so i dont know what to do. just seems ridiculous that this is so complicated. my whole intent is to change my printer email to something more user friendly, see what apps people really like to use that i can add...... but left at the door. HP? someone smart? please help......

    I was able to use eprint center, but my personal email address didn't work, same as yours. I never saw instructions to not use the random printer email address, and I finally tried that and it worked. The email address was the Printer Code @hpeprint.com. Once I got in like that, it let me create a nicer email address for my printer, but the suffix is still @hpeprint.com. I have not been able to use my personal address in the eprint center, so I guess it really wants the printer's email address. I hope this helps you!

  • I have a private Adobe ID and I have a Lightroom Testversion running there! Now my university gave me access to Creative Cloud for Teams and I want to use my Lightroom catalogues with this ID! How can I do this?

    I have a private Adobe ID and I have a Lightroom Testversion running there! Now my university gave me access to Creative Cloud for Teams and I want to use my Lightroom catalogues with this ID! How can I do this?

    Hi,
    thank you, it’s done! The Chat helped me! Now I cannot go into this forum anymore with my old password, but that’s not a big problem.
    Best wishes,
    Christian
    Von: JimHess <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
    Antworten an: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
    Datum: Montag, 20. April 2015 18:38
    An: Christian Kogler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
    Betreff:  I have a private Adobe ID and I have a Lightroom Testversion running there! Now my university gave me access to Creative Cloud for Teams and I want to use my Lightroom catalogues with this ID! How can I do this?
    I have a private Adobe ID and I have a Lightroom Testversion running there! Now my university gave me access to Creative Cloud for Teams and I want to use my Lightroom catalogues with this ID! How can I do this?
    created by JimHess<https://forums.adobe.com/people/JimHess> in Photoshop Lightroom - View the full discussion<https://forums.adobe.com/message/7454915#7454915>

  • Reading private key: works in jdk 1.5, but throws exception in 1.4

    Hello,
    I am trying to read an RSA private key from a file. I am using the following code snippet:
    KeySpec spec = new RSAPrivateKeySpec(modulus, pExp);
    KeyFactory factory = KeyFactory.getInstance("RSA");
    PrivateKey key = factory.generatePrivate(spec);
    This runs perfectly fine under jdk 1.5 on keys I generate with OpenSSL. However, if I recompile and run under jdk 1.4, I get the following exception:
    java.security.spec.InvalidKeySpecException: Unknown key spec.
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.JS_KeyFactory.engineGeneratePrivate(DashoA6275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.JSA_RSAKeyFactory.engineGeneratePrivate(DashoA6275)
         at java.security.KeyFactory.generatePrivate(KeyFactory.java:237)
    I have also tried using RSAPrivateCrtKeySpec but I get the same error. Can anyone shed some light on what is going on?
    Thank you.

    'Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files 1.4' Could be the solution.
    I had a similar problem with java 1.4 and those files do the work.
    ... finally the problem was that the password that protectd the keystore had 7 characters, using one of 5 characters works ok...

  • How to set up TimeCapsule (4th) to create own private (wired) network behind Airport Express (5th) that is set up to join existing wifi-network of fritz adsl modem/router?

    I work in an office building with free Wifi to connect to the Internet. I want to be able to use this internetconnection, but at the same time I want to shield of my own wired network.
    I've made the following configuration:
    - fritz adsl modem / router
    - Airport Extreme (5th gen) set up to join existing wireless network (green light, works)
    - Lan-cable from lan-port AE to wan-port TC (4th gen)
    - Lan-cable from TC to Mac
    - Lan-cable from TC to Printer
    When I set my TC (network-settings) in bridge-mode everything works fine, but my Mac and Printer get an IP-address from the fritz modem / router and are visible to others.
    I tried to set TC in NAT/DHCP-mode, but then I get the error message that I should set a static IP-adress for TC. When I set TC in DHCP-mode, it looses connection to the AE. I'm not sure what to do now. Does anyone know how to set up my TC and create my own private network and still be able to get on the internet?

    Hajenius wrote:
    Is there a better alternative? I'd rather not want to reset my TC every day.
    You are using free internet.. so there is a price to pay.. that is convenience and non-ideal network setup.
    The better alternative is to pay for your own connection. Then you are completely free of the possibility of others in the bullding seeing your connection. (as long as you secure the wireless).
    But I think you are probably over worrying about public wifi.. if it is setup right.. ask the building admins.. it should be setup so each user cannot see another users connection. This is typical for most wifi setup and simply means you can see internet connection but nobody else on the connection. ie other wireless users.
    Having a router with NAT makes it then more secure again and allows clients on your own network to interact with each other. But you can setup wireless to the free wifi for every client.. (depending on how many IP you are allowed).. and run a secondary network without internet access. This is easy for desktop etc where you have a wireless and a wired connection but less convenient for mobile devices.. unless you use a cloud connection and each client can link and share via that.
    Have I made the explanation worse??
    Think of it this way.. if you had 3 laptops.. all 3 could connect to the internet from the building wifi.. but they cannot talk to each other or share resources in local office. You can put resources out in the cloud, that can be shared.. but that adds traffic and most free services are not fast.
    Now you can also plug all three into Time Capsule by ethernet.. and share local resources. Files, printers backup etc. This network is not connected to the internet at all. Each laptop has internet via free wifi and local connection.
    For devices like iphones that have no ethernet or other method.. you could use local wireless and public wireless.. but in turns.. still the only advantage is less issues with double NAT.. if that causes problems.. then this is an alternative.

Maybe you are looking for