A/P Invoice w/o Tax

Our client is in Non Taxable Area.  All his invoices are with out Tax. Can I do invoices W/O Tax.
What Is the Procedure.

Hi
I think you would not have defined GL account while creating tax code.
Even though it is a nil tax code with zero amount as tax you have to specify account code in AR/AP column while creating tax code.Just give any account code.it will not have any impact.Try this it will work i believe.
Regards,
Ganesh

Similar Messages

  • Error while posting A/R Downpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code.

    While posting A/R Dowpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code error of "Unbalanced Transaction" appears. This error does not occur while posting A/R Downpayment Invoices with Non-Excisable Tax Codes.
    Kindly provide a solution for the same.

    SAP Note Number: 1179405
    Error -5002 when trying to copy a document with Sales BOM
    In order to create the delivery via the DI, you need to set the oDoc.Lines.BaseLine value to the LineNum value from the RDR1 table (in the above example you should enter the value 2).
    we set oDoc.Lines.BaseLine=0 before starting the lines loop. This has resolved the issue.
    This note was really helpful and it was found in another query.
    You can also refer to this. https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=19070513&messageID=6178079
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Sadanand Manda on Nov 24, 2008 12:16 PM

  • Excise invoice and sale tax  applicable  in consignment process

    Hi,
    How excise invoice and sale tax  applicable  in consignment process in below stages--
    in consignment fill up,consignment issue,Return andpickup
    Regards
    Ishikesh

    Hi,
    You have to pass JV for 50 picked up items through J1IS. For this you have to create new subtransaction type type and accordingly maintain the G/L in the tax on goods movement settings for acoount determination node.
    Regards,
    Sagar Wairagade

  • In PO invoice tab select tax code shown amount column KOMV-KBETR as 100%

    Hi,
    In PO invoice tab select tax code shown amount column KOMV-KBETR as 100% we need as 10% my alculation is correct but showing only 100%
    i have assigned tax rate in j1id as 10% and Ftxp as same tax code as 100% and condition is JM02 as non-deductable.
    in PO condition value is showing as 10% correct value but showing in amount column as 100%
    Please suggest
    Thanks
    Shital

    No reply

  • How to divide the amount invoice in 10% tax and 90 in liability in credit

    Hi all
    I am using AP, GL and CE. My customer has this problem. When he registers a new invoice for some specific suppliers, he wants to do this accounting:
    Credit 10% of invoice amount in a tax account
    Credit 90% of invoice amount in liability account which defaults from the supplier site
    Debit 100% expense account
    I did not find any solution for this, so please help me because my customer is stuck at this point.
    Thank you and best regards
    Ernest

    Hi Octavio,
    I have followed the steps in AP guide section you advised.
    I have set up a new withholding tax.
    After I register a new invoice, on distribution screen I wanted to specify the new tax on "Tax Code" field and after clicking on "Calculate Tax" button the system was supposed to calculate the withholding tax. But on the invoice distribution, on "Tax Code" field it does not display the tax I have added.
    Please give me a hint, am I missing any step on configuration of withholding tax, so that it may be displayed on this field?
    Thank you.

  • Uploading A/R Invoices alongwith Withholding Tax through DTW

    Hi All,
    Did any one tried uploading A/R Invoices alongwith Withholding Tax through DTW? How to fill the Withholding tax data template.
    Regards,
    Siddiq

    Check this thread Import AP invoices with withholding tax

  • Oracle Inferface Invoices Rejects Canadian Tax Code

    Hi to All,
    Today we incountered Oracle Interface Invoice issue where a invoice with Canadian Tax Code "HST" was rejected. Researching the Open Interface Invoice Lines we can see for the invoice the tax code "HST".
    But when we go to quick invoices and view the rejected invoice the TAX Code "HST" is NULL. When attempting to update the invoice we get the following error: FRM-40212: Invalid value for field TAX_NAME.
    We have checked the tax code in Oracle and tax code is enabled.
    We have also checked the Acct Distrubtion and accounts are enabled.
    We have been processing several invoices for CAD with tax code "HST" and we have not been having any issue.
    Would like assistance on where the issues lies and how to resolve.
    Thanks

    hi,
    1. Check if the GL date entered in the invoice header is in open period and status set to null before running payable open interface.
    2. Check if "GL period" is open for that period in GL responsibility.
    I also faced the same issue:
    Re: Payable interface error: ACCT DATE NOT IN OPEN PD
    Regards
    Imran

  • AP Invoice import and tax line

    Hello
    I would like to import ap invoice tax lines in v11i
    For suppliers set up with calculation level at line, I managed to create the invoice with tax line and miscelleneous line but when I validate the invoice, a new tax line is created .
    How can I avoid this without modifying the supplier set up ?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Aurelie
    Edited by: user12010732 on 11 janv. 2013 06:08

    Populate tables
    ap_invoices_interface;
    ap_invoice_lines_interface;
    You can take a look the logic in AP_IMPORT_INVOICES_PKG.
    Like as;
    INSERT INTO ap_invoices_interface
    (invoice_id,
    invoice_num,
    invoice_type_lookup_code,
    invoice_date,
    exchange_date,
    exchange_rate_type,
    vendor_id,
    vendor_site_id,
    invoice_amount,
    invoice_currency_code,
    terms_name,
    doc_category_code,
    last_update_date,
    last_updated_by,
    last_update_login,
    creation_date,
    created_by,
    SOURCE,
    accts_pay_code_combination_id,
    org_id,
    attribute15)
    VALUES
    (x_invoice_id,
    x_invoice_num,
    x_invoice_type_lookup_code,
    x_invoice_date,
    x_exchange_date,
    x_exchange_rate_type,
    x_vendor_id,
    x_vendor_site_id,
    x_invoice_amount,
    x_invoice_currency_code,
    x_terms_name,
    x_doc_category_code,
    x_last_update_date,
    x_last_updated_by,
    x_last_update_login,
    x_creation_date,
    x_created_by,
    x_source,
    x_accts_pay_code_com_id,
    x_org_id,
    x_vendor_site_code);
    INSERT INTO ap_invoice_lines_interface
    (invoice_id,
    invoice_line_id,
    line_number,
    line_type_lookup_code,
    amount,
    accounting_date,
    description,
    last_update_date,
    last_updated_by,
    last_update_login,
    creation_date,
    created_by,
    tax_code,
    po_header_id,
    po_line_id,
    po_line_location_id,
    po_distribution_id,
    quantity_invoiced,
    tax_code_override_flag,
    dist_code_combination_id,
    tax_recoverable_flag,----1.4
    tax_recovery_rate,----1.4
    org_id,
    attribute15)
    VALUES
    (x_invoice_id,
    x_invoice_line_id,
    x_line_number,
    x_line_type_lookup_code,
    x_amount,
    x_accounting_date,
    x_description,
    x_last_update_date,
    x_last_updated_by,
    x_last_update_login,
    x_creation_date,
    x_created_by,
    x_tax_code,
    x_po_header_id,
    x_po_line_id,
    x_po_line_location_id,
    x_po_distribution_id,
    x_quantity_invoiced,
    x_tax_code_override_flag,
    x_dist_code_combination_id,
    x_tax_recoverable_flag,----1.4
    x_tax_recovery_rate,----1.4
    x_org_id,
    x_concatenated_expense);
    Run import program.
    Regards,
    Bilal SARIOZ

  • WO & invoice mismatches on Tax level

    Hello,
          Please do provide solution as facing problem while doing Miro
    Case is as follows
    1. WO is booked with 0 tax rate as there is no confirmation of contractor for tax it gets finalised at the time of invoicing
    2. While doing invoicing user is posting invoice with changed tax code which is agreed by contractorat the time of finalising payment.
    3. At the time of comparison work order amt & invoice amt for tax gets differntiate.
    can  we change tax rate of workorder at the time of Invoicing automatically with doing some field integration for updation.
    Regards,
    Vaishalee

    hi,
    at the time of invoice verification the tax rate comes from tax code which u had maintained in FTXP or FV11 t-code.so plz maintain various t codes for u r requirement and put it in MIRO.
       if not then u hav to do in seperate task by means of manual entries. in MIRO GL Account tab.
    thank you

  • Invoice non deductible tax amount vs Purchase order

    In the purchase order the tax amount is calculated item by item (ME21N). In the invoice (MIRO) when we select flag “Calculate tax” the system calculates the tax amount for the total of all the items. Because of this system behaviour in the invoice verification sometimes we obtain small differences.
    These differences should not exist specially when we are using a non deductible tax that affects the material valuation with the goods receipt and has to be corrected in the moment of the invoice verification.
    Why does the system have a different behaviour from the purchase order to the invoice?
    What can be done?
    Best regards

    Dear Biju K
    Whatever you mentioned about condition NAVS is there in system.
    I am not adding tax code in PO, referring your earlier email I am asking that.
    For adding other element I have not asked anything here, only to clarify your statement
    You need to cross check why non-deductible tax amount needed in your PO with NAVS condition type and its purpose.
    I explained this.
    My question is simple that in one PO I am getting non-deductible tax but if I change vendor for the same material I am not getting non-deductible tax in condition tab ? I am not able to understand why its happened ? If one PO shows means there are chances that basic configuration is correct but may be somewhere something is wrong, I want to find out that.  If you can throw some light on that its helpful for me.
    regards
    Nitin

  • R12 - AP Invoice Lines Interface & Tax Codes

    We have a slight problem getting AP Invoice Lines through the Payables Open Interface. In 11i the value held in the TAX_CODE column was validated (against AP_TAX_CODES I believe), and if wrong or missing the line was rejected. The eTRM for R12 claims this column is still validated, although against ZX_TAXES_B, however testing shows this to be untrue. Support documentation from Oracle (e.g. note 472649.1) suggest a number of other columns are now used for tax validation, however testing agains shows this to be untrue. The only column we can find which is validated is TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE, and if this column contains a valid tax code then the invoice line will be accepted, however we cannot find any documentation which shows that this column should be used.
    Has anyone out there bottomed out this issue, and if so is there any insight you could offer?
    Many thanks.
    Edited by: user13317468 on Jul 4, 2011 1:32 AM

    Hi Vinod,
    please check the below reference from oracle support ...
    Case Study: How Payables Open Interface Import works with EB Tax for importing Invoices [ID 1381400.1]
    Regards,
    Ivruksha

  • Billing and excise invoice for composits tax concept

    Hi,
      I want to know the billing process, we are in manufacturing as well as in service providing,  in manufacturing  for the finish material  for the billing we follow the process,  after delivery with VL01N  we create the billing document with VF01  then ref. to VF01 document we do J1IIN  then in VF02 we release the billing document for accounting,  and in case of service invoice  from sales order we directly creat the billing document with VF01 and release to accounting,  so I want to confirm whethere this is the right process,
    Second think which I want to confirm  as per the new composit tax concept , we are giving service along wit material  the tax is service tax on
    BASE amount                          XYZ
    Service tax      10%                  on XYZ
    Ecess               2%                    On service tax amount
    SECES              1%                     on service tax
    BVAT                                      Addition of all above
    VAT                  12 %              on BVAT amount
    ,  for this which procedure to be follow,     
    VA01 , VL01N, VF01 , VF02 release to accounting  or
    VA01, VL01N, VF01, J1IIN, VF02, release to accounting.
    regards,
    zafar

    If your requirement to have a pricing procedure to meet this requirement, try as follows:-
    100:::PR00::::Base Price
    110:::ZSER::::Service Tax::::100
    120:::JECS::::Ecess::::::::::::::110:::::::110
    130:::JA1X::::SHECess:::::::::110:::::::110
    140:::BVAT::: (Not clear what is this)
    150:::JIN7::::Vat:::::::::::::::::::::140:::::::140
    In this, if you want to levy ED also, then you need to insert appropriately in the above
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Self billing invoice with input tax code

    Hello experts,
    we are currently trying to implement a billing procedure with credit memos within the module SD. In this set-up the recipient of a service (company using the SAP) creates a credit memo for the renderer of a service (a debitor in SAP) showing the amount the recipient of the service/product has to pay. The credit memo will also show VAT (we currently only try to implement a process for transaction within Germany, no cross-border transactions yet). For the recipient of the service (= issuer of the credit memo) the credit memo is similar to an incoming invoice (self billing invoice). Hence, the shown VAT on this credit memo - if all other requirements are met - can be treated as deductible input tax.
    In order to automatically process the credit memo correctly as incoming invoice it has to be linked to a tax code (Steuerkennzeichen) with tax type "V" (=input tax) (Vorsteuerkennzeichen). To achieve that we have created a new condition record (Konditionssatz) that performs that task.
    So currently we create a credit memo request (Gutschriftsanforderung) which is linked to an input tax code (Vorsteuerkennzeichen) via mentioned condition record. We then create the billing document. During creating the billing document an accounting document should also be created. But that is where our approach does not work properly. The system creates a billing document (credit memo) but does not create the corresponding accounting document. We receive the error message:
    Document .... saved (no accounting document generated)
    Message no. VF050
    When trying to release the document to FI via Transaction VF02 we receive the following, more detailed error message:
    Only output tax is allowed for account 480000 1000, VZ is not allowed
    Message no. FS215
    This problem has to be somehow linked to the usage of an input tax code. If we perform the same procedure with an output tax code (Ausgangsteuerkennzeichen) we will not receive the error message and an accounting document is created.
    It seems that the account determination is responsible for the described problem: Although an input tax code is assigned, the account key (as shown in the overview to the applied conditions on the items within the credit memo request (Item - Condition - Detail)) does not change from "MWS" to "VST" and therefore an output tax account (Account Number 480000) is determined for the tax amount. And for that output tax account the usage of an input tax code is not allowed.
    Has anyone an idea how to solve the described problem or how to implement the billing procedure another way?
    We are aware that there is such a functionality within the module MM called "Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)" but this is not suitable for our purposes since we want to implement this within SD and without the need to create an order first which seems to be necessary for ERS.
    Thanks for your help,
    Bernd

    Hi
    Please check in FS00, of that G/L account  in control data tab what is the Tax Category that has been maintained.Check wheather input tax/output tax has been maintaind or not
    In FS00 in the control tab check the box Posting without tax allowed
    Regards
    Srinath
    Edited by: sri nath on Sep 30, 2011 4:55 PM

  • Problem creating A/R Invoice with Withholding tax data via DI-Server

    Hi!
    Using the following SOAP Request to the DI-Server, I wanted to create an A/R Invoice having a withholding tax data but it always respond with an error saying
    Total taxable amount of all rows exceeds the base amount  [INV5.TaxbleAmnt][line: 1]
    SOAP Request:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
    <env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
      <env:Header>
        <SessionID>203A3C01-7808-4638-8322-2307DF3C0F8F</SessionID>
      </env:Header>
      <env:Body>
        <dis:Add xmlns:dis="http://www.sap.com/SBO/DIS">
          <Service>InvoicesService</Service>
          <Document>
            <DocType>dDocument_Items</DocType>
            <HandWritten>tNO</HandWritten>
            <DocDate>2010-02-08</DocDate>
            <DocDueDate>2010-02-08</DocDueDate>
            <TaxDate>2010-02-08</TaxDate>
            <VatDate>2010-02-08</VatDate>
            <CardCode>NPI</CardCode>
            <Comments>test di-server soap message 1</Comments>
            <DocumentLines>
              <DocumentLine>
                <ItemCode>TRC</ItemCode>
                <Quantity>1</Quantity>
                <Price>1000</Price>
                <TaxCode>OVAT</TaxCode>
                <VatGroup>OVAT</VatGroup>
                <TaxLiable>tYES</TaxLiable>
                <WTLiable>tYES</WTLiable>
              </DocumentLine>
            </DocumentLines>
            <WithholdingTaxDataCollection>
              <WithholdingTaxData>
                <WTCode>C140</WTCode>
                <TaxableAmount>1000</TaxableAmount>
                <WTAmount>100</WTAmount>
              </WithholdingTaxData>
            </WithholdingTaxDataCollection>
          </Document>
        </dis:Add>
      </env:Body>
    </env:Envelope>
    OVAT rate above is 10%.
    The withholding tax code C140 is setup as
    rate=10,
    Category=Payment,
    Base Type=Net,
    % Base Amount = 100,
    Rounding Type = Commercial Values.
    We are using the New Zealand/Australia localization in SAP B1 2007A PL49.
    The above code can be successful only if I set the <WithholdingTaxDataCollection> node to:
            <WithholdingTaxDataCollection>
              <WithholdingTaxData>
                <WTCode>C140</WTCode>
                <TaxableAmount>0</TaxableAmount>
                <WTAmount>100</WTAmount>
              </WithholdingTaxData>
            </WithholdingTaxDataCollection>
    setting TaxableAmount equal to 0 which is not desired.
    Can anyone extend me some help, please?
    Thanks.

    Albert,
    Did you try adding this via the DI API and not the DI Server?  Do you get the same error?  Please see this SAP Note ...
    https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/smb_searchnotes/display.htm?note_langu=E&note_numm=0001303019
    Eddy

  • Error in A/P invoice -non deduct tax a/c missing

    Dear All
    While adding A/P invoice from base GRPO where it contains frieght an error is displaying:non deduct tax account is missing for stock item.
    In frieght the stock option and distribution method is none only,but A/P invoice getting added with out frieght this is issue is coming only when freight is given.
    Please provide the solution
    Regards
    M Auditya

    Hi,
    Change your distribution method from NONE to Quantity option to post the document.
    Check the below threads
    Non Deduct Tax Account is Missing for Stock Item [Message 439-125]
    Re: Error:Non deduct tax acount missing in stock item
    Senthil Maruthappan.
    Team work Never Fails

Maybe you are looking for

  • OracleBAMAdapter Configuration problem in SOA suite 11g

    Hi, In Oracle SOA suite 11g(11.1.1.2.0), OracleBAMAdapter configuration using WebLogic server console is resulting in the following error * An error occurred during activation of changes, please see the log for details. * [J2EE:160149]Error while pro

  • Bug in production Server !!!

    HI all, There is a bug in production server. Error message i am getting is :- "There is an IDoc in the Warehouse outbox that did not arrive in the ALE inbox of the source system." It is a master data that gets loaded in ODS. I have checked in PSA but

  • Creating NAC remediation rules based on MAC address

    Hi All, Any idea please. Is it possible to control PCs allowed on the network based on MAC address list in NAC? I.e Create a list of MAC addresses for PCs on my network in NAC; then each pc granted network access (passed NAC authentication and remedi

  • AD Password Expiration prompt missing in OS X 10.9

    Dear Team, Our Macs with Mac OS X 10.6.x - 10.9.x are bind to our AD domain. Binding and authenticating works well. We also have a policy for all user to change their passwords every 60 days. This requirement is set on our domain controllers. Our OS

  • Alternate colors for Analysis grid in workbook

    hi all, I am wokring on Bex 7.0 , Can anyone guide me how to acheive the alternate colors in the  data area of Analysis grid in a workbook.This property is available in web items but i am not able to do to with the workbooks.And also pls I need an ex