A page ie6 looks different than in other browsers

The site is www.GigHarborWashington.com
When viewed in most browsers it renders correctly.  When viewed in ie6 a white border on the right is added with approx 180 pixels.  Additionally, a portion of the image behind the nav bar is repeated and the text on the 3rd image is cut off. I tried adding no-repeat to the areas of question and it created problems in ie7
I have attached my css file.  Any suggestions on how to repair these problems in ie6 without affecting other browsers?
Thank you,
Mike

Thank you Nancy,
I am off to a meeting but will work on this later and respond if that was the solution or not.
Regards,
Mike

Similar Messages

  • Colors in FCP looks different than when playing in QT7

    The colors of the video's in FCP looks different than when playing back in QuickTime. I wonder if it can be a color management setting in FCP? I have the same problem when playing a clip in AE. I have two FCP machines, but only one of them is having this problem. Any ideas of what I can do to get the right colors back?

    Have you enabled Final Cut Studio Color Compatibility in the QT Player preferences?

  • Need help The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo

    i had canon camera and had problem The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo.any body can kelp me
    [IMG]http://tralalatrilili.ga/thanks.png[/IMG]

    Do you capture in RAW or JPEG? What software do you use to view your image? Is your monitor calibrated? What is the brightness level on your camera LCD? All of these information can affect your image. And keep in mind that image on the back of the camera is often brighter and more saturated.
    Weekend Travelers Blog | Eastern Sierra Fall Color Guide

  • The way Aperture renders my Nikon RAW (NEF) files look different than...

    The was Aperture renders my NEF files looks different than NX...
    Ok so I use all the in camera setting/tools to the best of abilities to try and cut my editing down as much as possible but when shooting RAW I end up having to tweak every images to get them back to what they really look like... I shoot often RAW and JPG combined and when I open a NEF in NX and a JPG in PS they are identical and need very little work, when I use Aperture the NEF files are very different looking from the JPG (or NEF in NX) and every single one needs tweaking (I get more redish/pinkish skin, often a hint of green cast to (slightly off WB/tone thing) and more contrast.
    Below is screenshot showing the difference between a JPG (or NEF in NX) and a RAW file in Aperture
    [img]http://www.pbase.com/ray645/image/120052970/original.jpg[/img]
    This is just a silly snap shot in very flat overcast light, and has the least amount of shift or difference of any image type so far, when I use strobes, shoot for a more contrasty image, gel for color and manual WB the differences are huge almost to the point that you would think you where looking at two completely different images and not the same NEF opened in different software.
    How do I go about getting Aperture to render my NEF's more like what I shot like NEF in NX, JPG in anything, and even the back of the camera screen?

    Thank you, that seems like will work, just having the boost turned down a bit on import has helped tremendously but I cant stop feeling like I am moving towards the "Fix it in post" mentality
    I will need to get better at tweaking my images... No matter how I try I cant kill the pinking skin or the very faint green glow in blond hair or bright neutral tones without affecting other areas of the image.. I am sure I will figure it out but anyone having any tips or links that could speed up my process I would appreciate it.
    The green is weird its like someone snuck a small florescent light into all my shoots without telling me, not major but enough to be annoying.
    I shoot a ton of motor sports (3000 images a weekend) and shoot JPG and have gotten good at using in camera pre sets, knowing what I got and getting it right in the camera, I wish Nikon would give up the code or whatever is needed for all the info to be carried over to Aperture..... I would pay the $100 or whatever to use the NX engine in Aperture

  • 920 cartridge looks different than the old one

    I just bought some new ink cartridges for my Officejet 6500a 710n-z printer.  I bought the same 920 XL cartridges that I have bought and successfully installed before.  However, the most recent ones would not install!
    These new cartridges are different than the others -- on the bottom, they only have the gold-colored contact plate.  The others had the gold plate and a little bubble-like item that I think was called an ink window.  Other than that, the cartridges are exactly the same.
    Have these cartridges changes?   What do I need to do to make them work in my printer?
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Hello BezaNH,
    Welcome to the HP Support Forums!
    Sorry to hear about the issues with the Officejet 6500 not reading the new generation cartridges. I believe I found a document that may help you resolve this.
    Some steps you will have done such as, remove and install cartridges, I would still suggest following through with all the steps. The images of the cartridges are that of the older generations cartridges, the steps are the same regardless.
    'The following ink cartridge appears to be missing or damaged' Error Message Displays on the Printer....
    Let me know how those steps work out, I will be keeping an eye on the thread.
    JERENDS
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click “Accept as Solution” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" to the left of the reply button to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • How is RMAN backup different than the other conventional methods of backup

    Hello to all,
    I have a question if somebody can please answer my queries
    How & Why is RMAN backup different than the other conventional methods of backup.
    What is different in the way a database is backed up using RMAN.
    I am very well aware of the capabilites of RMAN to recover from a loss , but I did like to know as to how RMAN makes it possible to go about it.
    Please answer
    Altaf

    You can start with the reading of the Oracle docs:
    Backup and Recovery Basics
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14192/toc.htm
    Backup and Recovery Quick Start Guide
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14193/toc.htm
    Backup and Recovery Reference
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14194/toc.htm

  • Cell spacing on my website's home page is different and misaligned only in Firefox, looks ok in all other browsers.

    On my website dominictwistphoto.com the homepage has three gallery buttons. Only in Firefox is the vertical spacing between these cells different causing the bottom button (gallery three) to stick out at the bottom and thus be misaligned with the main flash cell.
    This only happens in Firefox. I've been told to go back to Dreamweaver and adjust the dimensions, but this will surely cause it to be incorrect in all the other browsers won't it?
    I am using the latest version of Dreamweaver and Firefox.
    Any light you could shed on this problem would be much appreciated. Many thanks

    Ok now i see it. Go through the links. Maybe it will help.
    If it still doesn't help, try asking in these Mozilla Development Forums:
    * http://forums.mozillazine.org
    * https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/

  • Problem with ie6 displaying different to every other browser

    I have just created my website and after testing with all browsers except (stupidly) ie6 it all works fine but for some reason in ie6 it displays incorrectly on this page http://www.flitecarz.co.uk/WD-Postcodes-Covered.html the part with the problem is on the right hand side where there is a quick navigation to different postcode areas. If you view it in any browser except ie6 you will see how its supposed to work.
    If anyone can give me any help with this I will be forever in your debt as I have been racking my brains about this all day and I cant seem to find a soloution.
    Any help with be greatly received.

    Hello Nessa,
    here is another argument why you don't need to mourn about a possible bad presentation in this old IE6 Browser. This browser - you can say - is no longer in use. The spread is, the statistics shows it, very very low. The attached analysis from
    http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-monthly-201201-201202-bar
    shows this clearly.
    And as we already said, your website looks very well in contemporary browsers.
    Don't worry, ...
    Hans-Günter

  • Webpages look different on all mac browsers than they do on IE

    Ok, I just purchased an IMAC 27inch and I am not happy. The WebPages I used to do my job on my windows machine worked fine. On my IMAC, they look different, as if part of the page is lying on tope of another part of it, or like the tables used to create the web page are skewed.
    I have tried this on Safari, Firefox and Opera. I went back to the mac store and brought the webpage up on the model in the store and the same thing happen. The sales person downloaded and installed Chrome and there was no change. It did the same thing on chrome.
    Has anyone had a similar problem? WebPages looking different on the IMAC than they do on windows IE? I need to get this figured out fast or I will just take this thing back. I have 11 days left on the 14 day return policy. Help.
    I will try and figure out how to upload a pdf of both WebPages to this thread

    So, is this your first Mac? I remember when I switched over from a PC, I had the exact same issue. Trust me on this one, there is nothing wrong with your computer, it simply takes time to mentally adjust to the differences. It looks as if Safari does not show the complete webpage, or looks as if it is cutoff, or as you said, "skewed." But it is not, your eyes are so used to the IE format and your brain has grown so accustomed to your internet experience being a certain way that it takes time to get used to it. I posted the EXACT same question five years ago in this forum and everyone told me what I am telling you and I got pretty upset with some very knowledgeable people. Now I feel like a fool for having disagreed because I see nothing wrong with it at all, but I am using the same exact computer I was five years ago (I love IMac's, how many PC's can one say that about) You will get used to it, no doubt about it.

  • Duplicate version looks different than original -- same adjustments

    This morning I imported a few photos (D70 RAW), found they looked good with the default processing (no adjustments applied other than the default RAW 1.1 processing), and created duplicate versions to crop to different sizes. The duplicate versions look different -- the dark areas of the photos are lighter and noisier (sorry, still learning proper photo terminology). The duplicate versions have the identical adjustments (none). I tried toggling the cropping on/off, and the duplicate versions still look different.
    This is very odd... has anybody else experienced this?
    iMac 24" 2.16GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   2.0 GB RAM NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256 MB Nikon D70

    I did a little more investigation on this issue, and found that when I make the duplicate version, the image still looks identical. It is when I crop the image that things get messed up -- even if I then remove the crop adjustment.

  • Just bought MSI R5770 and card looks different than expected

    I bought this as an open Box from Fry's today.
    When I opened it up, the card looks completely different than the pictures I've seen online.
    The label on the back says it is a R5770 PMD1G and the serial number on the label matches the one on the box.  But the fan/heatsink combination is completely different.  The board layout (capacitors, etc) seems to be different as well
    I'm especially concerned by the small size of the fan compared to what I was expecting.
    Before I install it, I wanted to make sure I actually have the correct card that I paid for.  Here is a link to a pic.

    Quote from: Sansfear on 04-May-10, 19:29:16
    She slapped a new reduced price sticker on it and assured me that they'd test it to make sure it worked.  I'm willing to bet that if I go back there in a few days, that it will be back on the shelves and still have the wrong card in the box.
    I wouldn't expect anything less from them.  It was probably back on the shelf 15 minutes after you walked out.  If its worth anything, I don't buy anything open box.  The small savings isn't worth the hassle.

  • Lightroom Image Looks Different than in Windows Viewer/CS5/etc.

    I've seen this discussed elsewhere, but I believe the nature of my issue may be a bit different, so please excuse the repeat inquiry.
    I'm currently using Lightroom 3 on a 17' Samsung Syncmaster 920NW on two different desktops. The hardware configuration for each machine is also identical, with only a few minor exceptions. However, the images on one machine display drastically differently in Lightroom, as opposed to any other Windows application. I've updated the video drivers for both computers, reinstalled the monitor drivers for both, and have uninstalled/reinstalled Lightroom on both with no success in remedying the discrepancy.
    Any assistance would be greatly appreciated in finding a solution to this issue. It's very frustrating to be anchored down to one desktop due to the inconsistencies of the other.
    Thanks!

    You need to calibrate both monitors to identical settings, the luminance value being very important, using an appropriate calibration tool and software.
    Spyder Elite software has a specific settings too enable you to match monitors across machines in a studio setting, or from a desk top to a laptop. Without calibration images in viewed in colour managed applications will always look different. If you do not wish to colour manage you can always set a colour space such as sRGB as a monitor profile on all the machines, the only difference you will see then will be down to the luminance value of the monitor. However this will mean images viewed on other peoples screens may differ markedly from your own. The real solution to colour problems is to use colour management and this means calibration of your monitor as a basic requirement.

  • 'Play Full Screen' looks different than 'play'  (makes timing errors)

    In iMovie, 'Play Full Screen' behaves differently than 'Play'  Makes timing errors, cuts off the beginning of commentaries, etc.

    You can't disable tap/zoom scaling. What happens if you add a margin and disable thumbnail?
    Can you convert them to a Keynote presentation (Hype?)?
    One option would be to reduce the original video dimensions and add a frame/mask around it before adding into a book, that way when it is expanded, it sits at a smaller size. Bunch of work, maybe, so unless you have higher rez video, that may be your best option.

  • Why is it that iTunes looks different from all other apps again?

    This might be a rather irrelevant question, yet I wonder: Why is it that iTunes doesn't look like the majority of other Apple apps? I guess it's mainly the scrolls bars and the check boxes. Not that I don't like the way iTunes look, I'm just curious why it has to look different when one of Leopard's goals was to make a more unified interface.
    Can anyone enlighten me or is this something that only Apple knows?

    "Besides, not all of us run Leapard, so wouldn't making iTunes look like leapard make it look different on all our systems that don't use leapard?"
    That's a point But what I meant by that was that in Tiger there are many different kinds of windows where Apple in Leopard has tried to stick to just one. And that's why I think it's so weird that iTunes has to differ from all the rest.

  • IWeb pages only working in Safari, not other browsers.

    I have created a website in iWeb for my school. All pages open and function correctly in Safari, for either Mac or Windows, but not other browsers. One of the pages in question is: http://www.grovemedia.k12.ok.us/Information.html   The "Parent" page a similar problem. Any help would be appreciated. I have tried deleting and recreating the pages with no success.

    Have a look at this...
    http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/Browser-Compatibility.html
    http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/iWeb-Internet-Explorer.html
    "I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link."

Maybe you are looking for