A SMART Test Failed on the Drive

Computer won't start load Windows usually. During Diagnostic, I received the following message:
ERROR CODE: BIOHD - 7
Error : A SMART test failed on the Drive
Testing: st3750528as (9up2y6fc)
Does this mean my hard disk is failing or is it a software problem? Will doing a disk recovery help?
This question was solved.
View Solution.

TangoK, welcome to the forum.
This error message means that your hard drive is failing. If you get it to boot, you should make a backup of your personal data. You should replace the drive with one as large or larger for the System Recovery media to work.
For future reference, when requesting help you should always include the make/model (i.e. p6-xxxx) of the computer and/or monitor. This information is necessary for us to review the specifications of them. We would be able to furnish you with guides to help you Recover the system after the drive is replaced.
Please click the "Thumbs up + button" if I have helped you and click "Accept as Solution" if your problem is solved.
Signature:
HP TouchPad - 1.2 GHz; 1 GB memory; 32 GB storage; WebOS/CyanogenMod 11(Kit Kat)
HP 10 Plus; Android-Kit Kat; 1.0 GHz Allwinner A31 ARM Cortex A7 Quad Core Processor ; 2GB RAM Memory Long: 2 GB DDR3L SDRAM (1600MHz); 16GB disable eMMC 16GB v4.51
HP Omen; i7-4710QH; 8 GB memory; 256 GB San Disk SSD; Win 8.1
HP Photosmart 7520 AIO
++++++++++++++++++
**Click the Thumbs Up+ to say 'Thanks' and the 'Accept as Solution' if I have solved your problem.**
Intelligence is God given; Wisdom is the sum of our mistakes!
I am not an HP employee.

Similar Messages

Thinkpad T410 SSD Smart Test Fail

About 2 weeks ago started getting this Windows error message
The following hard disks are reporting failure:
Disk Name: SAMSUNG MMCRE28G8MXP-0VB
Volume C:\
Ran Lenovo Solution Center Hardware scan and everything passed except the SSD, here are the results.
Result code: WHD00F001-WI3X4K
SMART status test - Failed
Targeted read test - Passed
Random seek test - Passed
Funnel seek test - Passed
Drive Info
Firmware: VBM1EL1Q
Size: 119.24GB
Partition: MBR
Any ideas? I can't find anything anywhere on this error.

Welcome to the forum!
Sounds like a failing SSD, but there have been reported one too many false positives of this nature...
Download and run HD tune to check the condition of the drive.
http://www.hdtune.com/
Good luck.
Cheers,
George
In daily use: R60F, R500F, T61, T410
Collecting dust: T60
Enjoying retirement: A31p, T42p,
Non-ThinkPads: Panasonic CF-31 & CF-52, HP 8760W
Starting Thursday, 08/14/2014 I'll be away from the forums until further notice. Please do NOT send private messages since I won't be able to read them. Thank you.

Simple SSL test: failing with "The certificate is not trusted ..."

WebLogic 10.3.4 on Win7.
I created a new domain and enabled SSL,with listen ports 7001 and 7002 for http and https respectively.
I deployed a trivial webapp whose main page runs in http, but it opens an iframe with https for a different page in the app.
I loaded the main page, but the iframe fails to load, giving the following error:
The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.
(Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
What is the easiest path to get this working?

Hi David,
I dont think that the Demo Certificate shall cause the issue.You can enable the SSL debug in weblogic and check what exactly is wrong,while loading the iframe window.
Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer
Moreover,you can try to add the root certificate to your IE browser and check it
Tools -> Internet options -> content ->Certificates ->
After your import,You can verify the same by checking it from the list and then verify by accessing it again

HP Pavilion g6-2330dx. "No Boot Device. Insert boot disk and press any key" Memory test failed

Hi. So I am trying to help a friend with her laptop. It's a HP Pavilion g6-2330dx.
Product #: D1C01UA#ABA
Serial #: [Personal Information Removed]
Windows 8
ADATA 4GB RAM
Toshiba 640GB HDD from the looks of it.
The laptop is unable to boot into Windows, so I suspect the hard drive. But I ran the hard drive test and it passed all the tests. The SMART test and both the short and long test. I ran the tests multiple times and it passed each time. I tried reseating the hard drive and still no go. I also removed the HDD and connected it to my desktop PC to see if it detects and it did. Ran the Windows 7 own HDD test and it passed.
Currently, there doesnt seem to be any operating system at all on the HDD. When I check, there is a C: drive of ~90GB partition that is ~90GB free, but inside there are Windows files/folders. There is also a D: drive Recovery partition that says ~26GB with only ~2GB free, but when I go inside there's only ~350MB worth of data.
So then I ran the memory test (in BIOS) and it failed immediately. I reseated the RAM module. I tried the other slot. It still failed. So is it safe to say the memory is the cause of this problem?
Pressing the F11 key that is supposed to take me to the System Recovery only leads me back to the black screen with "No Boot Device. Insert boot disk and press any key"
I even tried to install Windows 7 to see if it'll work. I was able to get the laptop to boot/read off the Windows 7. But when I click to install, it asks for a boot device driver or something like that.
My friend doesn't have the recovery disk either. I guess she lost it.
Anyway, is it as simple as replacing the memory or could it actually be the HDD (even though it passes)?
EDIT: This is what the System Log in BIOS says
0021           Time: 10/13/2014
03F0           Time: 10/13/2014
03F0           Time: 10/13/2014
The date was the first time I ran the tests. I havent received those numbers (error codes?) since.
EDIT: Just for kicks, I ran Memtest 2.11 just now (forgot I had the disc) and it immediately went red with thousands of errors, hah.

Hi bghs,
Welcome to the HP Forums!
It is a fantastic place to find answers and information.
For you to have the best experience in the HP forum I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide Learn How to Post and More
I understand that you were unable to boot into Windows, and you suspected the hard drive and tested it, but it passed both short and long test. With that being said and the fact that it also passed leads me to believe the hard drive is fine.
You tested the memory and it failed. You tried reseating and swapping slots but they still failed the test.
I would test each card individual with the memtest to determine if it is just one or both cards that have an issue.
When you installed it in another computer, you did see the recovery partition. Once the memory issue is resolved, if you are still unable to boot into Windows, I suggest you do a recovery with the minimized image.   Here is a link to Performing an HP System Recovery (Windows 8) to assist you with that process.
I hope this helps.
Sparkles1
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom right to say “Thanks” for helping!

Hard disk test failed on HP Pavillion dv6-1100eo notebook

I have a HP Pavilion dv6-1100eo Entertainment Notebook PC (P/N: NR597EA) with Vista 32-bit. Unfortunately no warranty left in and general I have been very happy with this notebook.
However suddenly Wondows would not start up - and it did not even find Startup Recovery partition on the harddisk. As I wasn't sure if this Startup Recovery was on hard disk or not - I ordered System Recovery DVDs for this Scandinavian language version.
These disks did not work - so I figured I have probably not done my homework before ordering those disks.
Then I ran system Diagnostics (even if I have a old BIOS version F.03). On the diagnositics - both Quick and Full Hard disk test failed during the first 1% of the scan.
Is there anything that can be done - or is the only option new hard disk? In case - what hard disk is recommended that is not too expensive - as I don't want to invest too much into a soon 3 year old notebook.
I recently bougth an external harddisk (1 TB) based on USB connection. Can that be used bypassing internal HD. In this way I would increase HD capacity and not invest anymore into this notebook - since I already have the recovery DVDs
It is probably only a time question before I will buy a new HP notebook - that is why I don't want any long permanent fix of this problem.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi,
Sorry to say, but you won't be able to install or boot Vista from the external HDD, so if you need to get the notebook working, you're going to have to replace the internal drive.
The drive on the link below is an example of one that would be fine for your notebook.
500Gb Hard Drive
The procedure to replace the Hard Drive starts on Page 57 of your Maintenance & Service Guide.
Once done, simply use your Recovery DVDs to reinstall the Operating System on the new drive.
Regards,
DP-K
****Click the White thumb to say thanks****
****Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem****
****I don't work for HP****
Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience

T430 2342CTO - SanDisk 16GB mSATA Target Read Test Fail

Hi all, my Lenovo Solution Center (LSC) told me that my mSATA had a targetd read test fail. I ran the test myself and it had the same issue. Read some threads and tried the LSC test but only tested the SSD, and it passed all tests when ran this way.
Went to the IBM Electronic Service Call website and entered the details and they sent me an empty box to ship my laptop back for repair. This seems overkill as I'm sure I could just pop in a new mSATA if that really was the problem, I don't want to give up my PC.
My T430 seems to run fine. Wondering if this is a software problem with LSC? Here is my error code:
LENOVO HARDWARE SCAN ERROR: RESULT CODE: WHD01V002-UI8VYJ DATE RUN: 1/26/2013 - 14:52 DEVICE: SANDISK-SANDISKSSDU10016GB-123659310730
(don't get this error when I test the SSD by itself, only if SSD is tested right after the primary HD)
Is it worth sending back to Lenovo? Or does LSC have a glitch?
Thanks for any input
Graeme
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I'd like to hear the answer to this as I'm on my second drive in 2 months of ownership. No symptoms other than that it failed this test.
Replacing the drives create a lot of work after because you have to reload all your programs, files and configure everything as you would for a new computer. They seen to want to keep throwing parts at this fix on mine.

VI Analyzer Front Panel Size and Postion Test fails

Hi
We make a lot of use of the VI Analyser and I have been playing with the configuration settings to try and make it only fail the tests that matter to us and I have one test I do not understand correctly.
From the LabVIEW help
Panel Size and Position—Checks that a front panel
completely resides within the bounds of the screen. The test also checks whether
the front panel is larger than the maximum specified width and height. If you
are using a multi-monitor system, the test fails if the panel does not reside
entirely within the bounds of the primary monitor. This test works only on
standard, control, and global VIs.
I would like to apply this test, a simple check developers are not creating huge VI, it sounds simple enough, but I cannot seem to get this test to pass.
I am working with two monitors and this test fails when my VI is on either monitor with the message "This VI's front panel does not reside entirely within the specified bounds (1280 x 1024)" my current screen resolutionis 1280 x 1024, so I assume as long as my VI front panel fits within one screen it should be a pass.
I can clearly see my that VI front panel (and block diagram for that matter) fits within the screen of either monitor. If I look at the VI properties of my VI the Window Size is 474 x 513, could anybody please suggest when why this might be failing.
cheers
Dannyt
Danny Thomson CLAD
Sub10 Systems Ltd
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Norbert,
Thanks for the prompt reply, my asking the question and your reply has made me play with this a little deeper and I have managed to solve my problem.
In case anyone else has a similar problem here are the details.
When you have two monitors and look at the Windows properites you see one monitor is identified as 1 and the other as 2, thses identities are based on the graphics card and the which monitor is plugged into which ouptput connector. You can then chose which monitor you wish to act as your primary monitor. You would suspect it would not matter once you have selected your primary monitor BUT IT DOES.
My inital set-up
Left Hand Monitor    - idenity 2 selected to be primary monitor
Right Hand Monitor - identiy 1
With this set-up everything looks and acts as I expect it to task bar, icons etc on my primarry monitor. However if you run the VI Analyser it will fail Panel Size and Position on BOTH the left and right hand monitors.
I crawlled under my desk and swapped the monitors cables round so now the set-up is
Left Hand Monitor    - idenity 1 selected to be primary monitor
Right Hand Monitor - identiy 2
Now the VI Analysers Panel Size & Position Tests will pass on the left hand monitor but fail on the right hand monitor, just as would expect.
It appears that LabVIEW is looking not only at the windows "Primary Monitor" setting but also the identies, this does not seem the behaviour I would expect nor the correct behaviour.
cheers
Dannyt
Danny Thomson CLAD
Sub10 Systems Ltd

Primary Surface Test Failed

I recently purchased a brand new Lenovo T61 Notebook from Lenovo and downloaded the Lenovo System Toolbox. After running the Diagnotics, the Primary Surface Test Failed under the category Video Nvidia Quadro. The notebook was purchased with a Discrete Graphics Card. Tech Support was contacted after the failure who stated that it could be a bad video card or simply nothing. Tech Support also stated that it doesn't appear that I have a Discrete Graphics Card and that the card is built into the motherboard. The graphics on the screen appear to be fine. It is still under warranty.
1. How do I determine if a Discrete Video Card was installed without opening the cover? I paid extra for the Discrete Video Card.
2. Does anyone understand what the Primary Surface Test is because the Lenovo Tech Support seemed to be questioning their answers by asking me what I thought. This did not give me total confidence in the Lenovo Support.
Thanks!
KALNH

I have the same failure with the latest version of PCDoctor on my T60p. using a FireGL V5250. This appears to be a new subtest of the adaptor as the version of PCDoctor shipped on my machine runs without error also the current Dos version does not report an error.
I guess it's another Lenovo validation problem. (This really 'turns me off') hopefully it maybe fixed in a future update. (at least they could warn users that the latest version of PC-Doctor may (?) report errors if run on older hardware (System Update)
I have no other problems with the video card running under XP so I guess I can ignore it for now.
I note that the original post on this thread was using a different Video Adaptor so the problem would seem to be a PC-Doctor related problem.
On further investigation I find that this Primary Surface test will run without error with the adaptor colour quality set at the highest setting (32 bit)on my FireGL video Adaptor...... HTH
Message Edited by DaveS on 01-15-2009 10:38 PM

Workflow configuration error - System Account connection test failed

Hi,
Has anybody faced a problem with Workflow configuration? The version we are using is 2.6.2 on Oracle database 9.2.0.5 on AIX5L. The workflow installation from 9.2.0.1 installation CDs goes through without any problem. But when the workflow configuration tool comes up it fails with the following error.
"SYSTEM account connection test failed".
The system and sys accounts are fine as verified by sqlplus. Any help is greatly appreciated.
The log file is shown below.
Workflow Configuration Assistant-AIX
WorkflowCA:
WorkflowCA: Workflow Configuration in progress...
WorkflowCA:
WorkflowCA: Screen width -2304-, screen height -1024-
WorkflowCA: Graphics User Interface mode
WorkflowCA:
WorkflowCA: Language - US
WorkflowCA:
WorkflowCA: Start testing connection, which takes less than 3 minutes.
WorkflowCA:
WorkflowCA: Account connection test for SYSTEM
WorkflowCA: SQL Thread: Thread[TstSQL,5,main]
WorkflowCA: chkSQL: true
WorkflowCA: cmdLine: /app/oracle/product/9.2.0/bin/sqlplus system/<Masked Password> @/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/wf/sql/wftstcon.sql
WorkflowCA: envVar[0]: -ORACLE_SID=rsdb-
WorkflowCA: envVar[1]: -ORACLE_HOME=/app/oracle/product/9.2.0-
WorkflowCA: envVar[2]: -WF_RESOURCES=/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/wf/res/wfus.res-
WorkflowCA: envVar[3]: -TZ=EST5EDT-
WorkflowCA: envVar[4]: -WF_NLS_LANG=AMERICAN_AMERICA.WE8ISO8859P1-
WorkflowCA: envVar[5]: -PATH=/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/bin:/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/lib:$PATH-
WorkflowCA: envVar[6]: -LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/lib-
WorkflowCA: envVar[7]: -WF_TNS_ADMIN=/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/network/admin-
WorkflowCA: envVar[8]: -WF_SHLIB_PATH=/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/lib-
WorkflowCA: Exit Val : 126
WorkflowCA: chkSQL is alive after 1 seconds: false
WorkflowCA: SYSTEM account connection test failed.
WorkflowCA: Terminating...
Thanks,
Chethan

We had this problem on 2 machines.
On the 1st machine, we tried the local install option after a few days (Local option with no connect string) and it worked with no problems!
On the 2nd machine, we could never get it to work even after opening a tar with Oracle. Finally we did a remote install from the 1st machine into the database on the 2nd machine. During the remote install while running wfinstall on the 1st machine, we just had to choose the remote option and the database service name for the connect string.
Thanks,
Chethan

Prerequisite test fails while agent deployment

Hi,
I am try to deploy agent 10g on solaris server with oracle 9i.
but the prerequisite test fails with the following error.
h1. Manual Fixes (1)
The following corrective actions need to be taken before proceeding. For your convinience check mark each item when you have fixed that issue. The check to ensure that the timzone is set on the remote machine has failed. [Hostname |http://p313xafmrt:4890/EMAgentPush/BaseServiceHandler?ACTION_CODE=42&showall=false#][IP Address|http://p313xafmrt:4890/EMAgentPush/BaseServiceHandler?ACTION_CODE=42&showall=false#]Details97.253.42.4197.253.42.41PROBLEM : The time zone environment variable is not set correctly.ERROR : Expected result: TZ Actual Result: Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Failed <<<<RECOMMENDATION : 1. Shutdown and restart ssh on all machines after ensuring TZ is set. 2. Update ~/.cshrc on all machines with the TZ value. Another option is to pass the timezone using the additional parameters with the -z <timezone>option for default shiophome scenario or the s_timeZone=<timezone> for the non default shiphome case.
any suggestions Please ?
Thanks,
Div

Hi Div,
Which version of Oracle 9i you are running! I saw this type of error when upgrading a Test Server from Oracle 9i (9.2.0.4) on Linux RH4 to Oracle 11g.
May be one of the reason for the Time Zone issues.
Ravi

CPA Cache Connectivity test fails

Hi All,
We are facing the following issues that have to do with the Adapter Engine:
1) In RWB, the Adapter Engine is in error/red status with the following details: Adapter Engine, message: fatal DeleteJob (Default Delete Job) failed.
2) In RWB, the Cache Connectivity Test fails with the following error: Communication with JMS server failed.
3) The CPA Cache refresh gives erros.
Any ideas? There are no Service users locked, SLDCHECK works fine etc.

Hi,
It seems to like problem with your JMS Connector.
For this, login into Visual admin -->cluster >services>JMS connector-->runtime (tab)->check the factories / destinations. Please contact with your basis team, they will might be helpful to you. After that restart your server, it will solve your issue.
Regards,
P.Rajesh
Edited by: Rajesh_1113 on Jun 5, 2011 9:01 AM

OSD Failed to add driver to driver store. Code 0x8022001b

Hello,
I am stuck at applying a Dell driver packages with SCCM 2007.
It's for the Dell Optiplex 7010 & Dell Latitude E6530
82579LM Gigabit Network Connection
I tried the Dell driver package but it kept failing and I ended up in creating a driver package with just the network driver but it also keeps failing.
I don't know what to do anymore because I really need to have a successful network driver installation to continue the deployment. The driver is working fine in WINPE because there I have an IP and Windows7 is installed(PXE deployment) but it fails installing
the driver on Windows7. I have also tried the latest driver from Intel (18.2).
Part of the log file (Driver package download successful):
Download done setting progress bar to 100 OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\01bee370-65be-4cbc-839c-0b6441b97f5d is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\01d4b3f7-a1ce-443e-9eb0-51700e8ee227 is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\03d386cd-4c3b-44d6-b1c2-b85d6d6cd5ff is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\15cff229-cbb6-43a3-add3-e2262505afbb is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\18d880d1-075f-4450-8ad3-45aa4be29cec is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\1e0c9d57-d6b1-462a-8cf2-b95d1b857380 is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\b58a6ac7-d015-4041-9378-654497f30d94 is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\de771279-76ba-4609-a634-0b4c4349b04c is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\e25063c2-235e-43df-970b-50d7f236cbb3 is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\e32fee5c-4b0e-4fd3-8ec2-8b55db9eecdd is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\ebacac22-5cfb-42ac-817c-7da025fa14a6 is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\f7aed134-7da1-47d8-a2b6-0a51cf618f6b is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
c:\_smstasksequence\packages\p010010f\ffe0e94f-7a7e-4cad-8293-1c069cfbf782 is a directory. Setting directory security OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:09 1676 (0x068C)
Content successfully downloaded at C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\P010010F OSDDriverClient
17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Adding "C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\P010010F\01BEE370-65BE-4CBC-839C-0B6441B97F5D" to Windows driver store. OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Setting %SystemRoot% to "C:\Windows" OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Getting namespace "Microsoft-Windows-PnpCustomizationsNonWinPE" for architecture "x86" OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Added list item with key value '1' OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Writing configuration information to C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\drivers.xml OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Successfully saved configuration information to C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\drivers.xml OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Setting temporary directory to 'C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp'. OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Calling Package manager to add drivers to the offline driver store. OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Command line for extension .exe is "%1" %* OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Set command line: "X:\WINDOWS\Pkgmgr\dism.exe" /image:"C:" /windir:"Windows" /apply-unattend:"C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\drivers.xml" /logpath:"C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\dism.log" OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013
10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Executing command line: "X:\WINDOWS\Pkgmgr\dism.exe" /image:"C:" /windir:"Windows" /apply-unattend:"C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\drivers.xml" /logpath:"C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\dism.log" OSDDriverClient
17/05/2013 10:33:10 1676 (0x068C)
Process completed with exit code 0 OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:12 1676 (0x068C)
Dism successfully added drivers to the offline driver store. OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:12 1676 (0x068C)
Successfully added "C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\P010010F\01BEE370-65BE-4CBC-839C-0B6441B97F5D" to the Windows driver store. OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:12 1676 (0x068C)
Adding "C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\P010010F\01D4B3F7-A1CE-443E-9EB0-51700E8EE227" to Windows driver store. OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:12 1676 (0x068C)
Setting %SystemRoot% to "C:\Windows" OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Getting namespace "Microsoft-Windows-PnpCustomizationsNonWinPE" for architecture "x86" OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Added list item with key value '1' OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Writing configuration information to C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\drivers.xml OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Successfully saved configuration information to C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\drivers.xml OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Setting temporary directory to 'C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp'. OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Calling Package manager to add drivers to the offline driver store. OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Command line for extension .exe is "%1" %* OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Set command line: "X:\WINDOWS\Pkgmgr\dism.exe" /image:"C:" /windir:"Windows" /apply-unattend:"C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\drivers.xml" /logpath:"C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\dism.log" OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013
10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Executing command line: "X:\WINDOWS\Pkgmgr\dism.exe" /image:"C:" /windir:"Windows" /apply-unattend:"C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\drivers.xml" /logpath:"C:\_SMSTaskSequence\PkgMgrTemp\dism.log" OSDDriverClient
17/05/2013 10:33:13 1676 (0x068C)
Process completed with exit code 2149711899 OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
uExitCode == 0, HRESULT=8022001b (e:\nts_sms_fre\sms\client\osdeployment\osddriverclient\sysprepdriverinstaller.cpp,558) OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
Dism failed with return code -2145255397 OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
AddPnPDriverToStore( pszSource, sTargetSystemDrive, sTargetSystemRoot, wProcessorArchitecture), HRESULT=8022001b (e:\nts_sms_fre\sms\client\osdeployment\osddriverclient\sysprepdriverinstaller.cpp,668) OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
Failed to add driver to driver store. Code 0x8022001b OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
InstallDriver( iInstallParams->sContentId, iInstallParams->sSource, iInstallParams->pBootCriticalInfo ), HRESULT=8022001b (e:\nts_sms_fre\sms\client\osdeployment\osddriverclient\driverinstaller.cpp,557) OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
Entering ReleaseSource() for C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\P010010F OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
reference count 1 for the source C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\P010010F before releasing OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
Delete source directory C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\P010010F OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
Released the resolved source C:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\P010010F OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
pDriverInstaller->InstallDriverPackage( sPackageId, pBootCriticalInfo ), HRESULT=8022001b (e:\nts_sms_fre\sms\client\osdeployment\osddriverclient\osddriverclient.cpp,409) OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
Failed to provision driver. Code 0x8022001b OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
Exiting with return code 0x8022001B OSDDriverClient 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1676 (0x068C)
Process completed with exit code 2149711899 TSManager 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1644 (0x066C)
!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------! TSManager 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1644 (0x066C)
Failed to run the action: Apply Driver Package.
Unknown error (Error: 8022001B; Source: Unknown) TSManager 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1644 (0x066C)
Sending status message . . . TSManager 17/05/2013 10:33:16 1644 (0x066C)
Any suggestions on this issue?

The failing part 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Error 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Error [gle=0x80004005]
2013-05-21 15:47:44, Warning 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Error 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Warning 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Error 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Error 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Error 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Error 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Error 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Error 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info 2013-05-21 15:47:44, Info I have still the of the dism.log file
DISM DISM.EXE: Succesfully registered commands for the provider: Edition Manager.
DISM DISM Provider Store: PID=808 Getting Provider DISM Unattend Manager - CDISMProviderStore::GetProvider
DISM DISM Provider Store: PID=808 Provider has previously been initialized. Returning the existing instance. - CDISMProviderStore::Internal_GetProvider
DISM DISM Provider Store: PID=808 Getting Provider DISM Package Manager - CDISMProviderStore::GetProvider
DISM DISM Provider Store: PID=808 Provider has previously been initialized. Returning the existing instance. - CDISMProviderStore::Internal_GetProvider
DISM DISM Package Manager: PID=808 <servicing> node not found. Nothing to do. - CPackageManagerUnattendHandler::Apply
DISM DISM Provider Store: PID=808 Getting Provider SmiManager - CDISMProviderStore::GetProvider
DISM DISM Provider Store: PID=808 Provider has previously been initialized. Returning the existing instance. - CDISMProviderStore::Internal_GetProvider
CSI 00000001 Shim considered [l:252{126}]"\??\C:\Windows\Servicing\x86_microsoft-windows-servicingstack_31bf3856ad364e35_6.1.7601.17592_none_0b0e4b4025cf4049\pkgmgr.exe" : got STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND
CSI 00000002 Shim considered [l:246{123}]"\??\C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft-windows-servicingstack_31bf3856ad364e35_6.1.7601.17592_none_0b0e4b4025cf4049\pkgmgr.exe" : got STATUS_SUCCESS
DISM DISM Smi Provider: PID=808 SMI provider selected "offlineServicing" servicing pass. - CSmiWrapper::ApplySettings
CSI 00000001 (F) 8022001b [Error,Facility=FACILITY_STATE_MANAGEMENT,Code=27 (0x001b)] #28# from CChildContextStore::CreateListSetting(path = /settings/DriverPaths, settingName = PathAndCredentials[@keyValue="1"], enumerator = @0x346f08, settingType = 16 (0x00000010))[gle=0x80004005]
CSI 00000002 (F) 8022001b [Error,Facility=FACILITY_STATE_MANAGEMENT,Code=27 (0x001b)] #27# from CWcmStateNodeCore::GetOrCreateChildOneLevel(fCreate = TRUE, fTopLevel = FALSE, fPredefinedList = FALSE, node name = [@keyValue="1"], name in handler = 0, childType = 16 (0x00000010), childMetaData = @0x335c20, childNode = NULL)
DISM DISM Smi Provider: PID=808 The following problems were encountered while deserializing settings. List of issues follows: - CSmiWrapper::ApplySettings
DISM DISM Smi Provider: PID=808 [Setting Override Error] hr=0x8022001b / Source=[Name: Microsoft-Windows-PnpCustomizationsNonWinPE, Language: neutral, ProcessorArchitecture: x86, PublicKeyToken: 31bf3856ad364e35, VersionScope: nonSxS, /settings/DriverPaths/PathAndCredentials/[@keyValue="1"]] / Description=[This list setting is marked for add, but a list item with the same key value already exists.]. - CSmiWrapper::DisplayDeserializationResults
DISM DISM Smi Provider: PID=808 End of list. - CSmiWrapper::ApplySettings
DISM DISM Smi Provider: PID=808 Error found in unattend settings - CSmiWrapper::ApplySettings(hr:0x8022001b)
DISM DISM Smi Provider: PID=808 d:\w7rtm\base\ntsetup\opktools\dism\providers\smiprovider\dll\smimanager.cpp:166 - CSmiManager::Apply(hr:0x8022001b)
DISM DISM Unattend Manager: PID=808 d:\w7rtm\base\ntsetup\opktools\dism\providers\unattendprovider\dll\unattendmanager.cpp:400 - CUnattendManager::Apply(hr:0x8022001b)
DISM DISM Unattend Manager: PID=808 d:\w7rtm\base\ntsetup\opktools\dism\providers\unattendprovider\dll\unattendmanager.cpp:654 - CUnattendManager::InternalExecuteCmdLine(hr:0x8022001b)
DISM DISM Unattend Manager: PID=808 d:\w7rtm\base\ntsetup\opktools\dism\providers\unattendprovider\dll\unattendmanager.cpp:603 - CUnattendManager::ExecuteCmdLine(hr:0x8022001b)
DISM DISM.EXE: DISM Unattend Manager processed the command line but failed. HRESULT=8022001B
DISM DISM Image Session: PID=808 Disconnecting the provider store - CDISMImageSession::Final_OnDisconnect
DISM DISM Provider Store: PID=808 Finalizing the servicing provider(DISM Package Manager) - CDISMProviderStore::Internal_DisconnectProvider
CBS Unloading offline registry hive: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/SOFTWARE
CBS Failed to unload offline registry: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/SOFTWARE, the client may still need it open. [HRESULT = 0x80070005 - E_ACCESSDENIED]
CBS Unloading offline registry hive: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/SYSTEM
CBS Failed to unload offline registry: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/SYSTEM, the client may still need it open. [HRESULT = 0x80070005 - E_ACCESSDENIED]
CBS Unloading offline registry hive: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/SECURITY
CBS Failed to unload offline registry: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/SECURITY, the client may still need it open. [HRESULT = 0x80070005 - E_ACCESSDENIED]
CBS Unloading offline registry hive: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/SAM
CBS Failed to unload offline registry: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/SAM, the client may still need it open. [HRESULT = 0x80070005 - E_ACCESSDENIED]
CBS Unloading offline registry hive: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/COMPONENTS
CBS Failed to unload offline registry: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/COMPONENTS, the client may still need it open. [HRESULT = 0x80070005 - E_ACCESSDENIED]
CBS Unloading offline registry hive: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/DEFAULT
CBS Failed to unload offline registry: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/System32/config/DEFAULT, the client may still need it open. [HRESULT = 0x80070005 - E_ACCESSDENIED]
CBS Unloading offline registry hive: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Users/default/ntuser.dat
CBS Failed to unload offline registry: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Users/default/ntuser.dat, the client may still need it open. [HRESULT = 0x80070005 - E_ACCESSDENIED]
CBS Unloading offline registry hive: {bf1a281b-ad7b-4476-ac95-f47682990ce7}C:/Windows/system32/smi/store/Machine/schema.dat
DISM DISM Package Manager: PID=808 Finalizing CBS core. - CDISMPackageManager::Finalize
same issue. It occurs with every driver package. Dism always fails to inject the drivers. What can I do about this?

NDISTest 6.5 - [1 Machine] - SRIOVBasicVerification test fails

Hi,
I am running NDISTest 6.5 - [1 Machine] - SRIOVBasicVerification test.
1. I have installed Hyper-V role
2. Created a VHD and copied to c:\VHDs
Started SRIOVBasicVerification test and provided VMName, VHDName, VHDpath.
I see below failure under task "Set Environment Variables for execution" eventually "Create SRIOV test switch" is failing.
kindly let us know what is the issue here. Thanks in advance.
End Test
2/4/2015 1:30:21.546 AM
DETERMINE TEST ADAPTER BASED ON SERVICE NAME AND PRIVATE NETWORK
Result:
Fail
Repro:
powershell.exe "C:\WLK\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRunD4ECA1E2-E7B2-4877-AD6F-3011BCD642BA\B3604642-6810-464A-BE04-C8FB70A364E1\Card_Select_Match_Test.ps1 C:\WLK\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRunD4ECA1E2-E7B2-4877-AD6F-3011BCD642BA\B3604642-6810-464A-BE04-C8FB70A364E1\PSWttLogger.ps1
DeviceID 'PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_1572&SUBSYS_00008086&REV_01\985C2DFFFFCA056801'"
Thanks, Krishna

Hi Mudit,
Test Name : TDI filters and LSPs are not allowed
When the above test is run from the server side, Test fails with the following error:
Cause : Failed to Start the Task
Cause : Zero files are copied when Trying to Copy From Path "\\testserver.ns.local\TaefBinaries\x64"....Failing
the Task
Failure : Failed to Start the Task "Copy TAEF Binaries"
Cause : Failed to Copy File : "\\testserver.ns.local\TaefBinaries\x64" Dest : "C:\WLK\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun6A2E5AF3-8C3E-4425-9997-5B809CAC2BB1\"
Cause : Cannot Find Pattern "\\testserver.ns.local\TaefBinaries\x64"
From WttEa.log , it displays "The network path was not found".
Error:
0x35, The network path was not found. WTTCreateDirPAth : CreateDirectory \\testserver.ns.local\HCKLogs\EaFolderAccessCheck\CF82A2A5-E08D-49C7-A078-4BA1416F1AA1 Failed File=d:\wtt25\wtt25\sdktools\wtt\jobs\runtime\wttexecutionagent\common\eautil\src\eautil.cpp
Line=1589
Error: 0x80070035, The network path was not found. (Error ( status = 53 ) in call: WttCreateDirPath(lpszTemp)
) File=d:\wtt25\wtt25\sdktools\wtt\jobs\runtime\wttexecutionagent\eamanager\runmanager\src\runmanager.cpp Line=2232
What is the issue in copying the files from testserver ? Why it fails ?

Xbox live. ip test fails. BEFW11S4

Im using the wirless network adapter by the way. Every time xbox runs the test the IP test fails. The weird thing is once I go back to the edit part, the IP stuff is filled in (except for the gateway IP). Should I do it manually instead? I've tried doing that but I don't know which IPs to put in since there are so many on the linksys setup pages. For me to get to the linksys setup page I type 192.168.1.1 I'm not sure if that makes a difference, but I honestly have no clue what to do now. The DHCP is enabled, but im not sure if i have to type in more things on that page. If anything needs to be edited on the linksys setup page tell me that too. Also, it's an 802.11b router (if that helps)
Message Edited by MMG41 on 12-28-2007 09:48 AM

Try this link to configure the X-BOX with wireless router.....

Hard drive i/o error, spinning beachballs. PASSES Smart test, but fails two specific parameters:

I'm on a Macbook from early 2007.
First off, I'm fully aware that my HD is probably on its last legs and I have two gigantic TB external HDs on which there are multiple images of the entire drive, so data loss is not currently a problem for me. I've also just finished college assignments for the summer so I can afford to mess around with this a bit before taking the plunge and replacing it.
What intrigues me is this. The machine has been extremely slow for a long time. Recently I disabled swapping and the speed rocketed, presumably due to the HD being utilized less during usage. Now the downside to disabling swapping is that when Safari Web Content gets out of control as it always eventually does, you can have a full on system hang which requires a forced shutdown through the power button. So it's very possible that the issues I'm currently experiencing are to do with the machine being improperly shut down one too many times and somehow damaging the drive itself.
But anyway, this is the interesting aspect. Using TTP I ran a SMART test on the internal HD from one of the bootable partitions on one of the external ones, and to my astonishment, it actually PASSES the smart test. The only two parameters which fail are the following:
Raw Read Error Rate
Write Error Count
An image of the SMART test results is attached:
Now to give you an example of the kind of issues I'm having, in order to take that screenshot I used "Grab". When searching for Grab in spotlight it gave me results from the internal HD and from all the various backup drives I have attached. I opened the internal copy and one from a backup partition on another drive (neither of which currently booted from). The one from the backup bounced and opened. The one from internal bounced about 15 times, the spotlight bar hung with a spinning beacball, and I ended up force quitting because I got sick of waiting for it. That's the major symptom of the issue I'm having.
Now here's the reason I'm posting. As I say I know this drive is about to go so there's no need to lecture me about that, I can't replace it immediately but plan to in the very near future when I have a chance. My question is this. Those two specific failed SMART results, what exactly would cause them in terms of HD problems? Bearing in mind that it passes every single other SMART parameter, am I looking at unmapped bad blocks, a physical problem with the head, a loose wire, a bad motor, or what? I'm just wondering specifically what might be wrong with the drive, out of pure curiosity more so than anything else. The fact that most parameters pass suggests to me that it's one very specific malfunction as opposed to the drive generally imploding.
A surface scan from TTP crashed, but not before giving me about 30 "Used block is not a file" messages.
Finally, to temporarily use this drive, what's the procedure? If it's unmapped bad blocks, to I erase and install, or do I go into the whole "zero all data, then reformat" option? I have a backup image taken last night from the external drive which I can restore to the internal any time I want, and as I say with so many backups and so few deadlines ahead of me I don't mind messing around a bit and experimenting.
So if it IS a bad block issue, what does one do to force it to map them?

Had a feeling. As I say it's already fully backed up and ATM I'm running the machine off a partition on the external. But as I say, I'm curious as to what's actually wrong with it - what type of damage / failure would cause those specific smart parameters to fail but not the rest? The motor, the head, the disk surface, what?

A SMART Test Failed on the Drive

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for