A thought about HD sizes and minimum needed disk space

This has just occurred to me and I am looking for more accurate numbers to help advise posters here, more accurately, when the situation occurs.
In this day and age of Macs with 500 Gigabyte and 1-4 Terrabyte drives, do we still need to tell people that have filled up their Macs' HDs that they need to leave 15-20 % of the total drive size free for OS X to still work properly.
Because this, actually, equates to a mimimum of 100 Gigabytes to, at least, 200 Gigabytes or more, for larger drives, of drive space that needs to be cleared of data! Just to have enough drive space for OS X?
Does anyone else thinks that this is a ridiculous amount that OS X, by itself, actually needs to run smoothly?
Does anyone here have a better estimation of just how many GBs OS X uses on an average basis?
I would rather have a more realistic size to have remaining on a hard drive than to keep using the percentage rule.
I know the percentage rule was used in the day when we had smaller capacity drives, so it would still apply in those situations.
But I do not think it no longer applies when drive capacities are so much larger today and getting larger.
Any thoughts and more realistic numbers welcome.
I am going to post this also, in the Mac Pro section.

Yes, going by percentage is just plain silly. Here is  the most intelligent comment on the subject I've seen (from Anonymous at XYMer's.) Btw, he wasn't recommending keeping a minimum of 75GB free. The 75GB figure was in response to someone who asked if that was adequate. 75GB was what happened to be free and it would appear it was far in excess of what was really needed.
Here's a link to the full discussion
http://x704.net/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=6004
These suggestions, so far as I can tell, have neither theoretical nor empirical basis. They're sort of like the advice that you need to always drink at least 12 glasses of water per day: someone said it once, and since then it has taken on a life of its own.
You really probably should keep some drive space free. If you have 75 GB free, you're fine. The amount that you might want to keep free could perhaps best be described as, "enough to hold everything without any fear of unexpectedly filling up." For comfort I'd set aside about 6 GB for virtual memory, but that number will vary vastly depending on how you use your computer. On top of that I'd keep several GB to leave room for the system to move files around, and maybe another half dozen GBs just in case I need to store something large or something unexpected. So I'd be shopping for a new hard drive or cleaning up big files well before space went below 16 GB. In reality, I wouldn't wait nearly that long, because I could extrapolate based on usage that I'd be getting uncomfortably full well in advance of it actually getting that full.
On the other hand, I have one machine that never really gets files added to it, that I keep with only a couple GB free because it causes no problems based on the way I use it and there would be no benefit in increasing the available space.
To be clear, nothing bad suddenly happens when you cut below some magic number. Rather, depending on how you use your computer, you may experience minor to noticeable performance degradation as free space approaches zero. The dynamic pager, for example, likes to create virtual memory files that dynamically double in size each time one is created, up to a maximum of 1 GB. If there's not room to create the file it wants, your computer could slow down or seize up. Likewise, if you're running very near the drive capacity, bulk writes could slow down because there may not be large contiguous sections of disk available. But you'll generally need to be really close to the edge to notice.
Back in ye olden days of teeny tiny drives, any particular file would take a greater percentage of available space, so it was on average more important to keep a larger percentage of the drive free. But to reiterate, how much space you have free doesn't really matter as long as there's enough of it that there's no danger of it suddenly filling up.
- Anonymous
Message was edited by: WZZZ

Similar Messages

  • A thought about HD sizes and mimimum disk space needed for OS X

    This has just occurred to me and I am looking for more accurate numbers to help advise posters here, more accurately, when the situation occurs.
    In this day and age of Macs with 500 Gigabyte and 1-4 Terrabyte drives, do we still need to tell people that have filled up their Macs' HDs that they need to leave 15-20 % of the total drive size free for OS X to still work properly.
    Because this, actually, equates to a mimimum of 100 Gigabytes to, at least, 200 Gigabytes or more, for larger drives, of drive space that needs to be cleared of data! Just to have enough drive space for OS X?
    Does anyone else thinks that this is a ridiculous amount that OS X, by itself, actually needs to run smoothly?
    Does anyone here have a better estimation of just how many GBs OS X uses on an average basis?
    I would rather have a more realistic size to have remaining on a hard drive than to keep using the percentage rule.
    I know the percentage rule was used in the day when we had smaller capacity drives, so it would still apply in those situations.
    But I do not think it no longer applies when drive capacities are so much larger today and getting larger.
    Any thoughts and more realistic numbers welcome.

    At 18% you start hitting where finding and writiing files and longer seeks as well as fragmentation starts to play a role.
    Mac Pro has 4 internal drives. Most learn to keep lean mean boot drives.
    Video and graphic or medfia storage perfrmance drops off at 70% level even with an array though you can push past that.
    The only people that should be concerned are those with single dirve setups and that don't have the luxury of just pulling drive sled and upgrading.
    I keep boot drive @ 50%. I don't like having all my files in one basket. And backups are external as well.
    Below 10% you should be getting low on space error messages and it is the directory as I said that may not be large enough or fragmented. And a clone will help. Disk Warrior buiids a single non-fragmented while TechTool Pro will write if necessary if it can't write or create a directory.
    Re-initializing your drives with each new OS or change under the hood is also a good idea as there are changes to partition structure that an update may try to modify but never like having the drive initialized.
    If you are looking and won't take no for an answer fine. Seems like you have what you want the answer to be and looking for something to support it.

  • How do I retrieve call history from my iPhone 4S? It only seems to log for about a month and I need an earlier date?

    How do I retrieve call history from my iPhone 4S? It only seems to log for about a month and I need an earlier date?

    If you have backup of your files, you can get your call history back as long as you sync iPhone with iTunes frequently.
    OK, the first thing you are required to do is close the function of "prevent iPhone from syncing automatically." in iTunes, avoiding to sync iPhone again.
    Now, connect your iPhone to pc and open iTunes.
    iTunes> preferences> devices
    All the backup data in iTunes will be displayed.
    Then,click the File menu and select Devices > Restore from Back up
    your iPhone will restart and you can find them back.
    This method only can find back the latest history, to get back the old, you should turn to a third party program for help.

  • I have been trying to get the full version of lightroom after using a trial version but it says something about "GB" ? And i need to log into different account or set up a new one? Please help?

    I have been trying to get the full version of lightroom after using a trial version but it says something about "GB" ? And i need to log into different account or set up a new one? Please help?

    I would love to give you more information but i cannot access that page again? i can add Lightroom to my cart but when i go into my cart it says there is nothing in there? I have a red bubble above "my cart" with a number 4 in it to show there is something there but there is not? It just wont let me buy anything?

  • I am unable to burn any info-photo ect on to a disk. I have a 27" I mac mid 2010 version. I put in a disk, hit burn, it runs for about 3 mins and ejects the disk sayiny there was an error with the drive and will not restart.

    am unable to burn any info-photo ect on to a disk. I have a 27" I mac mid 2010 version. I put in a disk, hit burn, it runs for about 3 mins and ejects the disk sayiny there was an error with the drive and will not restart.

    The optical drive has probably failed. It's a fairly common thing with these slim SuperDrives. Does it read any discs you put into it? You can try resetting the SMC and pram but I'll be surprised if it helps.
    To reset the SMC
    Shut down the computer.
    Unplug the computer's power cord.
    Wait fifteen seconds.
    Attach the computer's power cord.
    Wait five seconds, then press the power button to turn on
    Resetting PRAM and NVRAM
    Shut down the computer.
    Locate the following keys on the keyboard: Command, Option, P, and R. You will need to hold these keys down simultaneously in step 4.
    Turn on the computer.
    Press and hold the Command-Option-P-R keys. You must press this key combination before the gray screen appears.
    Hold the keys down until the computer restarts and you hear the startup sound for the second time.
    Release the keys.

  • I have an 8gb iPhone 4 and i need more space, is there a way to get more space rather then buying a whole new phone?

    I have an 8gb iPhone 4 and i need more space, is there a way to get more space rather then buying a whole new phone?

    No. Sell the 8gb and buy one with more capacity.

  • I cannot upgrade to FFv4.0, even though I am using OSX 10.5.8, I have 2.25GB RAM and 6.24GB disk space. I can't even give feedback via FF3.6...this is crap!

    I cannot upgrade to FFv4.o.
    According to Mozilla website software specs (http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/4.0/system-requirements/), I have to be running either OSX 10.5 0r 10.6 - I am using 10.5.8. So I assume I have the minimum requirement?
    Under ''recommended'' hardware (not required or minimum) it says I also need 512MB of RAM (I have 2.25GB), and 200MB of disk space (I have 6.24GB).
    I can't even give feedback via FF3.6, which is ridiculous.
    What am I doing wrong?

    Firefox 4 versions and later do not run on a PowerPC Mac.
    Firefox 4 and later require at least OS X 10.5 and an Intel Mac.
    * http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/8.0/system-requirements/
    For an unofficial Firefox 8 compatible version (TenFourFox) that runs on PowerPC Macs with OS X 10.4.11 or OS X 10.5.8 you can look at:
    * http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/
    * http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/37761/tenfourfox
    * http://code.google.com/p/tenfourfox/wiki/PluginsNoLongerSupported
    Firefox 3.6.x (Mac OS X 10.4 and later) can be found here:
    * http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
    * http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/3.6/system-requirements/

  • MacBook Pro with SSD that has a limited disk space (120GB). Rendering in Project File (User/Movies/Final Cut Projects), it takes huge space and the limited disk space would not be enough for the whole editing.

    I'm using MacBook Pro with 128GB SSD that has a limited disk space. As we know, when rendering in Project File (User/Movies/Final Cut Projects), it takes huge space and the limited disk space would not be enough for the whole editing.
    My question is, Is there any method to get the rendering Projects file saved into an external hard drive which is connected with USB/ Thunderbolt/ Firewire, with huge disk space (eg. 500GB HDD).
    Now, new project created in my Mac is automatically saved in (User/Movies/Final Cut Projects) and my Mac has ran out of space to hold the files.
    Thank you.

    You have at least 3 different ways to show the project library:
    1) Go to WIndow->Show Project Library
    2) Click the button in bottom left of your window: 
    3) Hit the keyboard shortcut (Command-0)
    The project library will be shown, occupying the area where the timeline usually is.
    Your hard disks will be visible. Click the hard disk where you want the new project to reside and hit Cmd-N to create a new project.

  • Fixed lot size and Minimum lot size

    Dear senior,
    My client has the following scenario. His supplier provides the item in a fixed lot size of 100. The minimum lot size to be ordered is 300.
    The supplier is a fixed vendor.
    I tried to maintain this information in the Material Master MRP views. Lot size  - FX, Fixed lot size - 100, Minimum lot size - 300.
    However, everytime, the minimum lot size will get reset.
    Is there any way , I can maintain this scenario via configuration or any other method?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Fixed lot size - 100 means for every 100 quantity system will create one purchase document.
    If you selected Lot size - FX - Fixed order quantity , then no need to maintain Minimum lot size & Maximum lot size fields.
    Then you have to maintain Fixed lot size filed only.
    Ex: 
    Lot size = FX
    Fixed lot size = 100
    There is a requirement of 300. Then system will create 3 PO's with quantity of 100 each.
    If Lot size is Ex - Lot-for-lot order quantity, then only need to maintain Minimum lot size & Maximum lot size fields in the MRP 1 view.
    Ex: Lot size = EX
    Minimum lot size = 60
    Maximum lot size = 100
    There is a requirement of 250. Then system will create 3 purchase documents, two documents with the quantity of 100 and third one with the quantity of 60.
    That's why, in your case system is reseting Minimum lot size every time.
    If you want to maintain Minimum lot size, then maintain
    Lot size as EX
    Minimum lot size = 100
    Max lot size = 300
    It will solve your problem.
    Regards
    KRK

  • What am I doing to make my screen zoom in while I  am using my mouse?  It zooms to about double size, and using the control key and mouse will not return it to its former size.

    When I am searching the internet and using my mouse, my screen will suddenly zoom in to about double size.  Clicking control and mousing will not return it back to where it was.  I have no idea what I am doing to cause this to happen or how to reverse it.

    Hi.
    If you're using a Magic Mouse, a double tap on the mouse with one finger will zoom.
    Double tap again to unzoom.
    Helpful?

  • Restoring the window size and position of Disk Utility

    I took my mac-mini to a memory upgrade this afternoon, and the guy, who was testing the new configuration of my mini, started, and changed the size of the disk utility window. I hate so much if someone tweaks my personal stuff/setting in their image so much, that I could explode! How can I restore it to the default size and position? I cannot find anything about this on the net, and this is the only setting, I could not restore.

    I'm sorry, ignore that Applescript Snippet, use this one instead (make sure to open disk utility before you run it!):
    tell application "System Events"
              tell process "Disk Utility"
                        set theSize to size of window 1
                        set theNiceSize to (item 1 of theSize) & "x" & (item 2 of theSize) as string
      display dialog theNiceSize
              end tell
    end tell

  • HT201269 I loaded photos from my motorola phone on to my 4s.  Now I can't delete the motorola pictures and I need the space.  suggestions?

    In the sync process, I loaded photos from my Motorola smartphone on to my iphone 4s.  I can delete photos taken with the iphone but I cannot delete the photos loaded from the Motorola.  I need the space.  suggestions?

    Photos that have been put on the iPhone via the sync process can only be removed the same way. You need to connect the phone to iTunes, select the device in the device pane, select the photos tab, remove the checkmark by the photos that you want to remove and then sync.

  • Bad File Descriptor in /dev/fd/3, and 94Gb of disk space missing

    I noticed a few days ago, possibly as the result of a recent kernel panic, that I have a large chunk of hard drive space missing. The Finder reports that I have approximately 89Gb of free space, but using "df" reports that there is approximately 178Gb free. Using "du" doesn't report any unexpected huge files, so I tried running GrandPerspective. In addition to the usual file usage and free space, this shows a single 94Gb block of "miscellaneous used space".
    I then booted into Single User mode to run fsck on the startup drive. This reported several errors, and took 3 passes to repair the directory structure, but didn't recover the missing space. I have subsequently run TechTool Pro and DiskWarrior on the startup drive (both of which found various minor errors), but the 94Gb still refuses to show itself.
    I then tried using "find" to look for single large files, using "sudo find / -size +94371840" (anything larger than 90Gb), and I get the following errors:
    find: /dev/fd/3: Bad file descriptor
    find: /dev/fd/4: Not a directory
    find: /dev/fd/5: Not a directory
    After searching Google, a "Bad file descriptor" error points to an inode issue, that fsck cannot fix, but I don't know enough (read: anything) about inodes to risk running the clri command to zero the problem inode.
    Short of blanking the startup disk and installing from scratch (not an attractive option), is there anything I can do to fix the broken inode and recover the missing space?
    Any help appreciated.

    Drawing Business wrote:
    I then tried using "find" to look for single large files, using "sudo find / -size +94371840" (anything larger than 90Gb), and I get the following errors:
    find: /dev/fd/3: Bad file descriptor
    find: /dev/fd/4: Not a directory
    find: /dev/fd/5: Not a directory
    This is not an error and always happens with find unless you exclude the /dev hierarchy from the search. (Interestingly this seems to have gone away with 10.5??)
    To locate your missing space, try WhatSize. Another alternative which I have not used personally is Disk Inventory X.
    As an additional point, with 10.4 it is actually better to use Disk Utility, since it does more than fsck: Resolve startup issues and perform disk maintenance with Disk Utility and fsck, quote:
    Note: If you're using Mac OS X 10.4 or later, you should use Disk Utility instead of fsck, whenever possible.

  • How to reduce image size on account of disk space shortage?

    I import images from my camera to iPhoto on my MacBook. I want to reduce their size on import because hard disk space on MacBook is limited.
    Is there any smart way how to perform it? I have not found any presets on Import dialog to reduce size.

    If the photos are important then get an external FW hard drive and move the library to it and operate from there. Delete the library from your MacBook.
    Next create a new library on the MB and copy only the photos that you have an immediate need for from the external library with the paid version of iPhoto Library Manager. It will copy the metadata, keywords, faces, places, and edited versions between libraries. You will a lean, mean travelin' library for the MB.
    You you add photos to the library on the MB while you're on the road you can copy them to the main library in the same manner with iPLM when you get back home.

  • Help needed: Disk space does not free up even after deleting files.

    Background information for this problem: I have my iPhoto library on an external HD, and was importing files from that same drive into iPhoto, and began receiving messages that I was very low on disk space on my internal HD. From here, it seemed like iPhoto was using my boot drive for some kind of cache. Regardless of the actual reason, I began moving files from my internal HD to fix this problem temporarily (while I was importing).
    At this point, I started fiddling with my files and found that no matter how many files I would delete from my HD, the available space in the finder would not free up. *At this point, I have less than 20GB on my HD, yet it says I have 1.23 GB available out of 108 GB.*
    Here is what I have already tried to fix the problem, to no avail:
    a) Original user was using Filevault. I backed up all the files, created a new user without Filevault, and restored the files.
    b) Booted from CD and used Disk Utility to erase free space.
    c) Verified and fixed permissions
    d) Deleted all app and system caches (via CacheOut X)
    e) Fixed/Repaired all user/system preferences (via Preferential Treatment)
    *Does anyone have any idea what's going on?*
    -

    Thanks for the suggestion.
    I ran WhatSize and here is the result. Oddly, it says there is 40.2 GB used (in the top-left) which conflicts with the information directly below it: "Capacity 108 GB, Used 103GB, Available 4.27 GB". Not so helpful.
    Disk Inventory X solved the problem, however. Much thanks! I wasted most of my weekend troubleshooting this sad issue. Anyway, Disk Inventory X revealed a bug where my external hard drive for photos was still appearing as a mounted volume, even though the HD was no longer connected. Freaky.
    After moving it to the trash and deleting it, I've recovered the space.
    Again, thanks! Contact me if you're curious about the details, as this might help you diagnose similar problems in the future.
    - Mike

Maybe you are looking for

  • Generic Extractor on cdpos & CDHDR - severe performance issues in productio

    Hello friends, Can you take a look at my code? I have used a view in cdhdr table for extractor.code executes okay in dev and QA, but had to cancel job after running 48 hours. Any help is appreciated. This is my code in CMOD... FORM Zpurchasing_exit 

  • Can RMAN 10g Keep Log of Backup History?

    hi experts, I use RMAN to backup my 10g database on a Windows Server. Not using Recovery Catalog. Database IS in Archivelog mode. I have the settings configured so that backups become obsolete after 10 days. ** But the auditors want to be able to see

  • How to change [console, login, single-user] screen resolution?

    Hello people. This computer has a 1600x1200 capable screen but it show console (by "console" I mean the DOS-like interface showning white text at startup, single-user (command-s) mode as well as the graphical boot logo and Login screen) in 800x600 on

  • Confused about 'provides'

    Check this PKGBUILD: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21002 I've seen this style in a few PKGBUILDs now. Is it really necessary to use =$pkgver in the provides array? Also, http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/mpg123/ This package p

  • X server won't start after recent catalyst-test and kernel upgrade

    Hi, after recent upgrade of catalyst-test (13.2) and kernel (3.7.5), my x server won't start with this log (WW) and (EE) only: [   114.989] (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory) [   116.077] (WW) Falling back to ol