A Very Green Question: Which Desktop for Premiere Pro

Hi guys,
First, please go easy; I'm as green as they come. I am looking into purchasing a new desktop for several functions, one of which will be video editing. I've been reading alot of everyone's suggestions on builds and systems ( 8gigs ram, say no to RAID 0, different graphics cards) - and most things are going over my head, so I thought I would come out and just ask the experts on a brand desktop.
My Current Platform: I've been using Adobe Premier Pro CS4 and Photoshop on (wait for it) an old Dell Latitude D830. I am actually very happy with what this laptop has done, but I'm looking for something that will take less than 20-30 minutes to render 2 minutes of video (although It has never had any issues running Photoshop).
My Intended Use: I will primarly be using the desktop for Photoshop (print advertisement/label mock ups) and Premiere Pro (5~10 minute Youtube Videos and the occassional 45 minute DVD) as well as word processing and other office related stuff.
I'm trying to keep the cost down - preferable around (or below) the $1000 mark, and I don't necessarily need to be on the cutting edge as long as I can get the functionality out of Premiere Pro and make a video in less than a decade.
I've been looking at the desktops from Dell (since mine has served me well over the years). I was recommended by one of their reps  to look into XPS 8300. I also looked at the 7100. I have also read recommendations on different sites for the HP options.
My Question: Based on my intended use, is the XPS 7100 a viable option, or do I need to step up to the 8300 (or even a full blown workstation like the T1100)? And if either of these works, am I better suited with the comparitively priced HP's (HPE-510t/HPE h8z)?
I appreciate any advice you can give to point me in the right direction. I don't feel comfortable building my own system ( I've read that most of you recommend that). I just want to make sure I don't buy a desktop and find it crashing on me because it can't handle what I'm asking it to do. I figure anything is really going to be an improvement over what I've been using.
Thanks again for your help,
-Scott

XPS 7100: Wrong CPU (AMD is too slow), wrong video card (ATI), only 2 HDD's (too few), mini tower (too small), insufficient PSU, Dell (crippled BIOS and no overclocking), extravagant price. Those are the first minuses I can see on this system and no positives.
XPS 8300: same limitations as the 7100.
Look for a big tower, Intel i7-9xx or i7-2600K CPU, 16+ GB memory, nVidia GTX 460+ video card, Win7 64 Pro, room for at least three HDD's.
Avoid Dell and HP, unless they have a system with all the components in a single system as the base system. If you need to configure a system, they steal you blind on the add-ons. Where you can buy a HDD on every street corner for $ 80, Dell or HP charge you around triple that amount, around $ 240, where you can add memory for $ 40 per stick on every street corner, Dell and HP charge you far more.
If you don't want to build yourself, look at ADK for a custom build machine.

Similar Messages

  • Windows 7 - which version to buy for Premiere Pro 5.5?

    Ive had a quick scout about but I cant seem to find a definitive answer to the question of which version of 64 bit Windows 7 is the best option for Premiere Pro? I didnt want to waste money by purchasing Ultimate only to 'tune' out most of the services - ala black viper's 'barebones' setup, to get the best from my limited hardware setup
    I am bulding the following simple system for a Non internet connected workstation for exclusive SD editing purposes, amd 64, 8Gb, GTX550 TI, 160 Gb Velociraptor primary drive, 2 Tb Assets drive and a 1 Tb output drive. I will be running production premium.
    Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
    Cheers guys, Les

    Win7 Home Premium is enough, but if you ever consider upping memory beyond 16 GB or using network services for a home network or backing up to a NAS, then you are better off with Win7 Pro. The price difference is small, so Pro looks like the better, more future proof option.

  • Is there no User Guide for Premiere Pro CS6?

    I am a FCP7 refugee trying to decide between Avid and PP CS6. After waiting for a few weeks for it to be available, I have been lookiig through the PP CS6 Help PDF. I was surprised to see that it is not a complete reference guide documenting the features of the application, but instead a mish-mash of short descriptions, with numerous links to videos, documents from earlier versions, and other external locations where one has to go to get the actual information--not very helpful as a guide to the application. Is there actually no comprehensive user guide from Adobe in a single document or PDF? Or is the only way to get information about the application to navigate through all these disjointed materials?
    If there is such a user guide, I would very much like to know where I can find it. If there isn't, I would have to count this as a very big factor in favor of deciding to go with Avid. This is particularly true given the absence of any current third-party books on PPro CS6, although such books are hardly a substitute for a well written and comprehensive user guide, something which is also true of the help PDF.

    Groppler wrote:
    Since the links are to the on-line CS6 help and the PDF version of that help, both of which are a collection of materials concerning CS5, CS5.5 and CS6...
    Yes, for CS6, new information was added to the CS5/CS5.5 documentation. We had to go this route because we are working with brand new documentation software. There simply was not enough time to integrate the software and complete a whole new set of documentation. Believe me, it was enough of a challenge integrating the old system with the new one--in addition to creating the articles for new features, and the connective tissue between them.
    There is only one person that does the docs for Premiere Pro, and that is me. I have limitations and guidelines I must follow, so I hope you understand.
    Groppler wrote:
    ...with links to external sources you have to go to for information, I guess the answer to my question is that there is no true user guide for Premiere Pro CS6 that one can go to for comprehensive information about the application...
    No, this is the Help. It has BOTH the comprehensive details about the software and community content where you can see how people are actually using the software. If the Help is lacking details about any feature, please alert me and I will include those details. I work directly from the engineering documentation and include every detail I can about any feature.
    Since my time is limited, I don't always have time to make supplemental materials like video tutorials, or articles. That's why I link to them. The crucial info is included in the docs, the community content is material that I personally approve as helpful and supportive to the documentation.
    Groppler wrote:
    ...without sorting through irrelevant information or navigating to all these third-party sites to see if they have information you are looking for.
    None of the community content is irrelevant. I sort through it all very carefully. Community content is supportive and helpful to users. It should not be necessary to sort through these tutorials as the info should be right in the docs. Community content is supplemental. If you don't find the information you were looking for in the docs themselves, create a comment right on the Help page and I'll see to it that it gets fixed ASAP.
    Groppler wrote:
    I am quite surprised by this and think the absence of a real user guide is a significant shortcoming of Premiere Pro, not shared by other products on the market.
    It is a real user guide. I'm sorry you don't feel that way. If you want a doc with only Premiere Pro CS6 info in it, I can understand that request. Unfortunately, that was impossible for this round.
    If you have any suggestions for the next round of Help documentation, a better place than here would be the Community Help forum. Please voice your concerns there, as the people that actually make decisions about Help are hanging out there.

  • Optimal Hard Drive Configuration for Premiere Pro CS5 and Pro Tools

    I am in the process of upgrading a workstation that is used primarily for multi-track audio recording in Pro Tools to use the following Adobe CS5 products for production of promotional videos in HDV (and AVCHD for the web) as well as printed marketing materials for bands and musicians: Premiere Pro, Encore, Photoshop, Illustrator and Soundbooth.
    Since Premiere Pro is probably the most demanding application of the group, I have been studying the suggested hardware configurations on this forum with great interest, particularly HARM's suggestions (including his Generic Guideline for Disk Setup) to determine which hard drives to purchase and the optimal manner in which to configure them.
    I am upgrading an HP Z800 with dual quad core 2.44 GhZ processors with hyperthreading (16 virtual cores), 12 GB of memory and an overclocked GeForce GTX 470.  Without setting up a RAID configuration (which I cannot afford at the moment), I would like to use the 4 available HDD bays in the Z800 in the optimal manner for Premier Pro, using currently available drives.  I am currently considering purchasing a 300GB VelociRaptor to use as my C drive because of the extended load times and demands placed on the drive by ProTools and the associated Waves plug-ins.
    I would appreciate suggestions to improve my following plan:  C (300GB  WD VelociRaptor) for OS and Programs; D (1 TB WD Black Caviar) for Media and Projects; E (1 250 GB WD Black Caviar) for Pagefile (approx. 18 GB) and Media Cache; and E (2 TB WD Black Caviar) for Previews, Exports and Pro Tools audio files.
    I have great respect for the knowledge of the members of this forum and eagerly await your suggestions.
    /Bill

    I very much appreciate the responses to my email because I know that all of your time is valuable and that you have chosen to use some of that valuable time to help an unknown individual.  This forum is remarkable because of the wealth of knowledge available and the willingness of so many to assist others.
    I now wish to narrow my questions to save you time and so that I can get specific advice.  I may not have not been clear that I have already upgraded to the HP Z800 with dual quad core processors and overclocked GTX 470, primarily for the improved performance it will provide in ProTools.  My question now is how to optimize its performance for Premiere Pro CS5.  Based upon my research, I am considering the following two upgrades, but I am open to other suggestions if they would provide better results at a similar cost
    1. I am considering purchasing a 600GB WD VelociRaptor ( WD6000HLXH) for my C drive on which I would place OS (Windows 7, 64 Bit) and programs in an effort to reduce loading times of large programs.  I have two questions: (1) Are members of the forum seeing a significant improvment in program loading times with the VelociRaptor because I am still not convinced that the price performance of SSD's justifies their use; and (2) There are so many models of VelociRaptors now that I want to be certain that I am purchasing the best version for my needs.  In addition to the usual 10000 RPM speed, this model has 32MB Cache and a 3.5" form factor as well as a SATA 6.0GB/s interface (which I doubt my motherboard can take advantage of but it might extend the useful life of the drive with future configurations).
    2. I currently have available for installation in the Z800 the following drives:  (1) WD 2TB Black Caviar; (1) WD 1TB Black Caviar; (2) Hitachi 1TB.  I believe that the Z800 can accept up to 5 SATA hard drives which I will have if I purchase the Velociraptor.  Although I am reasonably knowledeable when it comes to hardware, I have never set up a RAID configuration.  Therefore, it would be helpful if someone could recommend one of the various RAID configurations and brieflyexplain why it would seem to be best for my needs.  I can then focus my research on understanding that one configuration.
    I was planning to follow Scott's suggestion for my current 3 drives:  OS and programs on C (WD 600 GBVelociRaptor), media and projects on D (WD 1TB Black Caviar), export files and Pro Tools files (all live musician tracks, no samples) on E (WD 2TB Black Caviar).  However, I have been reading about the benefits of a RAID configuration so I am interested in further suggestions now that I have clarified my questions.
    Thank you all for your help.
    Bill

  • Apple, Mac Pro, Amd vs Nvidia with cuda? Why, and what to buy for Premiere Pro?

    Mac Pro has dual Amd video cards installed, and does not offer Nvidia cards with Cuda in this line up, as far as I can tell. The iMacs offer nvidia cards which seem a better choice for Premiere Pro which uses the cuda rendering capabilities. Which would be best for Premiere Pro? The quad Mac Pro, or the top of the line iMac with double the ram, say 32gigs vs 16 in the Mac Pro?  Why did Apple put AMD cards in the Mac Pro line?

    jtopenshaw wrote:
    Why did Apple put AMD cards in the Mac Pro line?
    Apple believes that OpenCL, not CUDA, is the future of GPGPU computing.  CUDA is closed and proprietary to nVidia only.  OpenCL is, as the name says: open.
    As of the creation and planning of the Mac Pro, nVidia's GPUs were (and most of them still are) very poor performers when it comes to OpenCL.  I expect that, over time, nVidia will catch up to AMD regarding OpenCL.  But they're not quite there yet, across the board.
    Why are the GPUs in the iMac (and Macbook Pro) nVidia?  They make better and more efficient mobile GPUs at this point in time.  The GPU in the iMac is similar to the GPU in the Macbook Pro in that they're both mobile, not desktop GPUs.  AMD has a fairly poor representation in that market (so far), so Apple stuck with nVidia.
    It's likely that Apple doesn't see the iMac and Macbook Pro lineup as devices to be used for massive GPGPU processing.  The Mac Pro, on the other hand is where they see that being used heavily.  Perhaps when and if AMD decides to produce an efficient and powerful mobile GPU, Apple will cut (back) over to them.  But one can only guess, there.
    Ugio wrote:
    What I can tell you it's that the mixture between Mac Pro (2013) and the last Adobe Suite does not worth the money.
    That's fair and is your opinion.  I don't agree. :-)

  • PProHeadless.exe has stopped working for Premiere Pro CS6

    I have had no problems with it until today.
    The video I was trying to produce was about 31 minutes long.
    I have had this PC less than a year and have never had PProHeadless.exe stop working for Premiere Pro CS6.
    what causes this to happen, has the last batch of updates caused this?
    PC specs:
    Windows 7 64bit fully updated
    MoBo Asus P6X58E-WS
    i7 quad core 950
    24 gigs of Ram
    10,000 rpm's Hard Drives
    very few things installed on this PC to avoid application conflicts, and I had no other applications running.
    Thanks for any input,
    Best regards,
    Tony

    Go to http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere and, in the area just under Ask a Question, type in
    PProHeadless
    You may now read previous discussions on this subject... be sure to click the See More Results at the bottom of the initial, short list if the initial list does not answer your question

  • Graphics card HELP for premiere pro CC

    So I've spent hours reading numerous forums in regards to what graphics card is best suitable for premiere pro cc that isn't overly priced (I.e. Quadro k4000 and 5000) I'm trying to stick in the 400-500 range for the PC I'm in the process of building. I need to know anyone's recommendations for a GOOD graphics card that isn't so expensive? I know they exist, I'm just not sure which fits best for premiere pro CC as well as the rest of adobe CC. I mean I hear people mentioning AMD vs quadro and GTX 680, etc. I know there's a list of approved cards from adobe, but that isn't what I'm looking for. I want one that will give excellent performance without emptying my wallet costing so much.  Please, any suggestions are greatly appreciated, thanks guys!
    -Andy

    Actually, I tend to agree with cc. That i7-4770 cannot be overclocked at all - not even in a limited manner (outside of the normal turbo boosting) - to start with (the maximum multiplier on the Haswell i7 CPUs is permanently locked to its nominal stock setting or its maximum stock turbo setting, depending on how the motherboard BIOS reads the settings). Second, that i7 has only four physical cores (albeit with hyperthreading). Third, no single non-RAID 7200 RPM hard disk has a sustainable maximum transfer speed above 190 MB/s even on the outer tracks (where the transfer speed is typically highest). As a matter of fact, I tested my auxiliary PC that's equipped with an i5-2400 and 16GB of RAM, and tested it with both older-generation GPUs (a GTX 560 non-Ti and a GTX 560 Ti 448-core), and while the GTX 560 Ti 448-core did perform about 50 percent faster than the plain GTX 560 (39 seconds versus 59 seconds - or put it in converse, the GTX 560 performed one-third slower than the GTX 560 Ti 448) in the MPEG-2 DVD test of the PPBM6 suite, the real-world improvement does not come anywhere close to the benchmarked difference (with either GPU, the i5 system took between an hour and an hour and a half to convert 40 minutes of HD material to MPEG-2 DVD using the VBR 2-pass method). This means that with such longer material, the CPU and memory performance comes more into play.
    Oh, did I forget to mention that Western Digital and its HGST subsidiary are the only brands that offer a consumer-level (desktop, as opposed to enterprise) 4TB hard drive that spins at 7200 RPM? (Seagate's 4TB hard drive spins at only 5900 RPM while Toshiba does not currently offer a consumer-level 4TB hard drive.) Outside of WD and HGST, you'll have to buy a much more expensive enterprise-level drive to even find a 4TB drive that spins at 7200 RPM.
    And unfortunately, at current street prices, the lower-end GT/GTX 6xx series GPUs are just too expensive for their performance. In fact, the GTX 650 Ti Boost and the GTX 660 are both priced too close to that of a GTX 760 for their own good right now (unless you go for a card that's equipped with the less desirable 1GB VRAM configuration based on either of those GPUs).

  • Notebook qualified for Premiere Pro CS4

    Hi, I was wondering if this laptop would be equipped to use  Premiere Pro CS4 on,  not so much heavy use. I'll probably get the i7 2620m processor instead assuming it's worth it.
    It's a Dell XPS 15
    Processor
    2nd generation Intel® Core™ i5-2410M processor 2.30 GHz with Turbo Boost 2.0 up to 2.90 GHz
    Operating System
    http://www.dell.com/mc.ashx?id=Tech-Spec-Formatting:MDA-ToolTip&c=us&l=en&s=dhs&modalwidth =400&modalHeight=150&ovropac=0&modalscroll=yes&modaltarget=div&modaltype=tooltip&position= bottom&title=Genuine&flip=true&eventType=rolloverWindows 7 Home Premium 64-Bit
    Display
    15.6 in HD WLED TL (1366x768)
    memory
    4Gb dual Channel  DDR3 SDRAM at 1333MHz
    hard drive
    500gbSATA hard drive (7200RPM)
    video card
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M 1GB graphics with Optimus
    For $100 more the laptop has 6gb ram and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M 2GB graphics with Optimus... would the difference in running PP CS4 be only marginal, or would it result in extremely worthy improvements?
    I use a desktop for editing but want to be able to use a laptop while I'm mobile, so I just want to assure I purchase a notebook that won't crash often or run too slow to bear while using PP.
    also wondering if a notebook with a drive that's only 5400 rpm would be acceptable if I'm also using an eSata?
    Thank you for your insight in advanced.

    I second Harm's and John's recomendations. That XPS 15, as configured as listed above, does not meet Adobe's practical minimum requirements for either CS4 or CS5. In fact, CS4 actually demands far more RAM than it it constrained to use (as a 32-bit program), meaning that it will never perform well regardless of the platform because CS4 relies extremely heavily on the pagefile due to the lack of total RAM support.
    And even if you plan to upgrade to CS5.5, that laptop suffers from several limitations:
    1) The i5-2410M, like all other mobile i5 CPUs, is only dual-core. And given that no desktop dual-core system performs as well as even a mediocre quad-core system, the dual-core laptops will likely be even slower than most of the desktop dual-core systems.
    2) The laptop has only 4GB of RAM. Unfortunately, the XPS 15 (in most configurations) does not support more than 8GB total of RAM. This means that you'd have to max out on the total RAM capacity just for Premiere Pro to even run acceptably well - and then, only if you choose a quad-core i7 (as in i7-2xxxQM).
    3) Because mobile hard drives are typically slower-performing than their desktop counterparts, consider an SSD instead as the laptop's system drive. But then, you'd have to put up with only one eSATA port and two USB 3.0 ports to connect an external hard drive.
    4) The GeForce GT 525M is barely adequate for CS5.x (if you choose to upgrade Premiere Pro to the latest version): It uses only DDR3 memory (current fast GPUs use (G)DDR5 memory), and it has only 96 CUDA cores. As such, it would be nearly two times slower than a fast mobile GPU.
    5) Dell often includes a fair amount of bloatware pre-installed on their systems - and the bloatware seriously degrades system performance. What's more, some of that bloatware cannot be easily uninstalled - and some parts of the bloatware are left on the system to screw up overall system performance even if the main bloatware apps are uninstalled.
    Put them all together, and you might very well end up with a system whose overall performance ranking is at or very near the very bottom of the PPBM5 results list on the PPBM5 site. In fact, even if you use CS4 and run PPBM4, your ranking would still be very near the bottom of the PPBM4 results list on the PPBM4 site.

  • FAQ: What computer and components should I buy for Premiere Pro or After Effects?

    See this page for the official minimum system requirements for Premiere Pro.
    See this page for the official minimum system requirements for After Effects.
    Note that the minimum system requirements are just that: a minimum to run the software. You will need components that exceed the minimum system requirements to achieve satisfactory performance in many cases.
    These resources are also excellent starting points for informing such decisions:
    "Hardware performance white paper: tips to configure or upgrade a workstation for video software"
    What PC to build? An update... (Premiere Pro Hardware forum thread hosted by Harm Millaard)
    What PC to build? (Premiere Pro Hardware forum thread hosted by Harm Millaard)
    After Effects CUDA benchmark testing results (from Danny Princz)
    After Effects CUDA benchmark testing results (from Teddy Gage)
    Premiere Pro Benchmark test and performance reference materials
    Resources for choosing a graphics card for Premiere Pro
    Specific to the questions of certain kinds of components:
    hard disks: Optimizing Hard Disks
    CUDA/OpenCL cards for Premiere Pro: CUDA, OpenCL, Mercury Playback Engine, and what it all means
    OpenGL in After Effects CS5.5 and earlier: GPU: OpenGL
    CUDA and OpenGL in After Effects CS6 and later: GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) features in After Effects CS6 and later
    Also see these resources:
    optimizing for performance: Adobe Premiere Pro and After Effects

    As David and Hal said
    One thing to consider is that you may also want SATA capability (which you can do with G5 towers easily, the dual cores have cards available or will shortly) and also shortly (fingers cross) for the MacBooks (there are cards for PowerBooks.)
    The only possible fly in the ointment is if you are going to hold onto these computers for awhile, with the Intel Chips the non-Intels will eventually have less support and software. Though for the short term (particularly if you are relying on non-Intel native apps and need peak performance) the Quad G5s are great.

  • GTX 760M 2GB DDR5 or GTX 850M 4GB DDR3 for Premiere Pro

    I'm hesitating whether to buy Asus N56JR or N550JK.
    Asus N56JR come with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 2GB DDR5
    Asus N550JK come with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M 4GB DDR3.
    For the Memory, I will upgrade it to 16GB RAM
    Both come with Intel Core i7-4700QM Processor & 1TB HDD 7200RPM
    My question is for Adobe Premiere Pro, After Effects and Photoshop, which one is recommended?
    Thank you

    I have N56JR and I use it for Premiere Pro, After Effects osv. It Works perfectly, but you must remember to set the nVidia card for the programs, or it will use Your other, Integrated intelcard, and that doesn't work that well (to say the least). But Yeah, everything is smooth and Works fine.I think you must set the Premiere Pro for CUDA engine too..

  • How to obtain Video and Non Video Serial Keys for Premiere Pro CS6

    Discovered that certain codec presets (specifically the AVCHD codec) was not available for Premiere Pro CS6 installed under Creative Cloud for Enterprise.
    Understand there are two different serial numbers for use in installation. One of these serial numbers is labeled "Video," and one is labeled "Non-Video.
    Where are these serial numbers located?   How are the serial numbers obtained?

    Hello Ann,
    Appreciate your reply..
    Here is where some additional confusion arises (reference bottom part referring to Video Serial Keys)   Adobe support said that these Video Keys are to be purchased from the reseller (which makes no sense)
    Error "...a sequence that could not be opened"
    So, if I understand from your replies and what I have read - it is of the belief that by de-activating and re-activating will address the issue of the missing codecs.  Do you believe this to be correct as well?
    Thank you

  • Want to build a video editing machine for Premiere Pro CC

    I will only be using this machine for Premiere pro CC.I would like you guys to have a look at the specs I have chosen,give your suggestions:
    i5 4th gen 4670K 3.4 Ghz LGA 1150 (Keeping in mind the benchmark tests found on this site for CC)
    Ram Corsair 16 GB Corsair DDR3 @ 1333Mhz. Either 4GB  x 4 or 4GB x 2 + 8GB X 1.I already have 8 GB of ram so I am stuck with 1333Mhz.Will this really matter? is 1600mhz better for video editing ?
    Motherboard has to be in MSI as I had bad experiences with Asus and Intel original.I am confused about the chipset though..Has to be Z series right??
    HDD - 2TB x 1 @ 7200rpm Seagate
               1TB x 1 @ 7200rpm Seagate     I already have the HDDs from the last machine.
    Graphics Card - Within 12k INR.No choice in particular though I had good experience with Sapphire AMD  6670 AND R7 250. I hear AMD is no good for video editing?is it true?
    Prefrences- Saphire for AMD
                        Zotac for Nvidia
    Please recomend me a PSU.What shoud be the wattage? Also, need some guidance for buying a UPS.Have this one as of now:
    http://www.snapdeal.com/product/zebronics-power-ups-u111/653520?utm_source=earth_feed&utm_ campaign=21_56&utm_medium=101239537
    psst- Do I need a cooling option if I am not running this machine in an air conditioned room?
    As for the OS is Microsoft Windows 8 / 8.1 SL OEM 64 bit ok ?
    I am also looking to buy a Full HD monitor under 12K INR. 
    Thanks a lot in advance !!

    The new Haswell E CPU is out now. THAT is what you want for a new editing machine. ESPECIALLY for heading into the future, which will involve 4K and other, maybe more DEMANDING codecs. SEE Eric Bowen's posting here on this forum regarding the test results for video editing using the Haswell E...vs. the older CPUs.
    The Haswell E now has a new chipset,( X99), that brings MANY new features, AND, the Haswell E NOW features "quad  channel" memory...to handle large amounts of data FASTER. The new motherboards have TEN SATA III ports, for a variety of HIGH SPEED storage options !! The OLDER motherboards are LIMITED to TWO SATA III ports.....PREVENTING creating FAST onboard RAID setups. The Haswell E is available with EIGHT,or, SIX cores...you choose !! Use at least 32 GB of system memory. Soon, Eric will post the results of the new Nvidia 970 and 980 video cards. in his video editing test. The 980 is ALREADY the top card in GAMING...BEATING the 780ti, DESPITE having LESS data throughput. The 980 MAY be the card you want....it is MUCH cheaper than the 780ti......down in the $500 plus range.
    Use the new Samsung 850 Pro SSDs in your  new system...or, the cheaper Crucial M550 series SSDs. The SSDs are now WAY more reliable than HDDs and are WAY FASTER, in many ways.

  • Lence flare plugin for premiere pro cc

    I need some help finding a great lence flare plugin 3d for premiere pro cc. Can somebody direct me to the right stuff ..   Thanks .

    Yes, Thanks .. Your right ... for this time in desided two make my own lenceflares in PS and animate in Premiere .. It took a long time, but i saved my money. I dont have AE, but mabye i should upgrade. I am novice to filmmaking, - .. I'm a Photographer and strong in Photoshop.
    Thanks all for your input , prices of plugins is very high - but my labor is not. 

  • I renewed my membership for premiere pro and I still can't use the app, what should i do

    I renewed my membership for premiere pro and I still can't use the app, what should i do

    Hi Lara,
    Lara Puharic wrote:
    I renewed my membership for premiere pro and I still can't use the app, what should i do
    Why can't you use it? Do you get a warning? Does the application not launch? What happens? Answering these questions will help: FAQ: What information should I provide when asking a question on this forum?
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • MagicBulletLooks1.4 for Premiere Pro CS5 Installation Problem:'unauthorized-register or reinstall'

    Hi,
    I have a problem with installing Magic Bullet Looks 1.4 for Premiere Pro CS5 on my computer. Upon installation, when I launch PrPro, drag and paste 'Looks' video effect on a clip on the timeline I get every time the following message:
    'Magic Bullet Looks is unauthorized - please register or reinstall'
    The clip over which I apply the Looks effect starts flickering and if I try to open the Looks' 'Edit' in Effects Control it fails and I got the following message: "Unable to create a preview frame for LooksBuilder'
    I tried to reinstall the software (as administrator) three times but the outcome was every time the same. I need to add that 'Magic Bullet MisFire' that came with Looks 1.4 installs properly and works just fine.
    Have you experienced the same problem? Can you please advise me how to fix it?
    Here are my system specs:
    Windows 7 (64bit)
    Adobe Master Collection CS5 (64bit)
    CPU: Intel i7 - 930
    12GB RAM
    Mobo: Asus P6T
    Graphics card: nVidia 250GTS (from MSI) with 1GB DDR3
    Thank you in advance!

    Harm,
    Magic Bullet Looks v1.4 is the latest one and the only one that works with the 64bit CS5
    http://www.redgiantsoftware.com/products/all/magic-bullet-looks/
    http://www.redgiantsoftware.com/products/all/magic-bullet-looks/compatibility/
    Igor

Maybe you are looking for

  • Transferring large volume of files from mac to PC?

    Hi i have a mac with osx 10.4.8 and a pc, i need to transfer a large amount of files from mac to pc (around 200GB) Now i have lots of external HDs which are all used by either the PC or the macs. the ones formatted for the macs cannot be read atall b

  • I have a major problem regarding Itunes mismatching sort-artists to the actual artist and reverting edits i make

    this has been ongoing for about one and a half years, it started when one day i signed in and discovered that nearly everly. single. song was mismatched all over the place, it took me a while to understand why because i'm not tech savvy, but discover

  • How to increase maximum no. of hits in F4

    Hi Experts, I have a client requirement as to increase the maximum no. of hits in F4 search. Client wants it to become 5000 as default instead of 500. Would you please let me know if this is possible? And how to do this change in the system? Thank yo

  • ORA-01555 thrown at DB Startup

    Hello guys :) We have the following situation on one of our test DBs. We are trying to open a DB after restore from hot backup with no archivelogs. The situation is rather interesting, since we don't have a prerequisite for 100% data consistency. We

  • Mac OS 10.5 unable to connect to Mac OS 9 server

    Hi, I just recently updated some computers to Leopard (one had Tiger the other had 10.2.8) and I am having trouble connecting to a server that is on a Mac OS 9. I am able to find the server, but neither computer can connect. I get a -5019 AFP Parm er