A video solution for Adium user's

http://www.adiumxtras.com/index.php?a=xtras&xtra_id=4959
Use headphones.

Kudos, Defcom!
Wow - now Adium users can use their iSights, too!
Score another great discovery by "The Doctor" !
Thanks,
Jim

Similar Messages

Need Video Chat for several users / one platform

Need Video Chat for several users / one platform
I thought Facetime might be good, but it works only for Apple. So, Skype it is.
Need a way to let users to video chat. Any suggestions?

You can use Skype group video call which is free.
Want to record Skype calls, check out at:
hereandhere

IWeb 1.1 SOLUTION FOR DOTMAC USERS???

Hi, here is a possible solution for people publishing to dotmac.
In iWeb, publish your site to a folder - save it somewhere on your system.
There should be TWO items: your "site" folder and an index.html file.
Navigate to your iDisk/Web/Sites/iWeb and locate your site folder AND an index.html.
Make sure you are IN the iWeb folder.
REMOVE these TWO items (YOU CAN TRASH THEM, BUT BEST MOVE THEM SOMEWHERE SAFE). This may take some time - site size and internet speeds.
Now copy the two items: (your "site" folder and an index.html file) that you previously publishedto your system, INTO THE IWEB FOLDER ON YOUR IDISK. Once again this may take some time ("zo find zomething else to do...").
If you find that there is no iWeb folder on your iDisk, have another go at trying to publish from iWeb to your dotmac. When it fails there is a good chance that at least it will have got as far as creating it - NOW REPEAT ABOVE.
Hope this helps, it worked for me, see: Recordiauawen.com
Good luck

I'm glad this is working for you. Can you tell us if
this method breaks any of the .Mac exclusive
features? Like search or counters, or password
protection, maybe slideshow functionality? I'm
thinking that it might because you are publishing to
a folder first, so iWeb might not include those
things tied in with .Mac.
==> www.DirtDoog.com <==</a>
Place A Virtual Pin On Putt-Putt's
GuestMap!
I reckon that publishing this way should enable ALL of the features that you would normally expect on your site. The downside is that it can all take a long time to do, unlike publishing straight out of iWeb - therefore, try and make sure that you've DOUBLE CHECKED all your stuff, (links, spelling etc) otherwise changing one word etc, may take some time.
I must confess that I haven't implemented any of the new features included
with the 1.1 update - so I couldn't say as to wether these work or not.
It would appear that other people are having problems with these new features, these may be bugs or just more publishing issues.
Possibly, try to return your site to its pre 1.1 state and then try the 'solution'
For me at least it allowed me to reinstate the site after my first attempt to publish in 1.1 totally ruined it. (things all out of place etc etc.)
G5 Dual 2.0 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Live video application for multiple users with RTMFP

Hi
We developed a live video application in Flex that uses RTMP. In one session up to 5 users are able to publish their stream and up to 20 users can join a group. For saving bandwidth costs and making use of lower latency with UDP we check RTMFP. From reading the documentation it seems that RTMFP multicast is the way to go.
Our frist results and additional research surfaced two 2 issues:
- Streams have a live delay (which seems to be multicastwindowduration + buffertime) that takes up to 30 sec to disappear but seems to increase again
- The application allows one user to change the size of a published video (camera.setMode). This causes a freeze with RTMFP for the publisher and all subscribers. Changing the size several times can cause to make the video work again for the publisher and subscriber (some bugs are already reported here)
For solving these issues I wonder:
1.) Is RTMFP multicast able to deliver a low latency solution that is needed for face to face v/a communication?
2.) if yes - are there any settings suggested by Adobe for the RTMFP NetStream multicast properties (like multicastwindowduration property) and if not can you give me some hints what would work for reduce the latency that face to face communication gets acceptable?
3.) How to deal with the setMode issue - does this happen because I misconfigured RTMFP or is this API not supported? Will unpublish and publish solve the issue (what api series do I need to use to do so?)
Best regards,
Marc

1) any practical use of P2P multicast will have a delay measured in seconds. it shouldn't go to 30 seconds unless you have a large NetStream.bufferTime.
2) i strongly recommend against changing the multicast stream parameters. they all interact with each other. decreasing the window duration will decrease the effective reliability of the stream, by reducing the amount of time to receive all of the fragments of the stream as they pass through the P2P group -- especially when people join or leave the group, which can disrupt the low latency "push" trees that are constructed in the group.
3) you should be able to change the encoding parameters on the fly without a major disruption. are you using H.264 or Sorenson Spark? it's possible that your camera doesn't like to have its capture size changed and it is freezing temporarily. i'm not having any trouble changing the capture size with my camera (and using H.264). i recall there being some issue with changing the frames-per-second on the fly (at least some time ago, and i don't remember what the issue is) -- there was enough of an issue that i disabled it in my little app while actively publishing.

IR video tutorial for business users

Hi There,
I was wondering if anybody came across a good tutorial (preferably video) on IR for business/end users?
I mean a tutorial that explains, in simple layman's terms, the low hanging features such as
1. How to user filters
2. How to select and hide columns
3. How to use control break
4. How to use highlight
5. How to save custom private reports
6. How to generate simple graphs
I haven’t looked at YouTube, I am sure there will be plenty but I can't access YouTube in our company intranet.
Just before I go and create one myself, I want to make sure I am not reinventing the wheels.
Thanks for reading
Cheers
Ligon

Not a Video but this answers your question...
Building your first Dynamic site in DW (PHP/MySql)
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/first_dynamic_site_pt1.html
Below, a couple of good video resources if you're thinking about learning PHP:
http://www.phpvideotutorials.com/free
http://www.killerphp.com/videos/
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
www.alt-web.com/
www.twitter.com/altweb
www.alt-web.blogspot.com

Solution for Windows users who repeatedly get "iPod in Recovery Mode".

If you are repeatedly receiving this message using iTunes 7 on Windows when connecting your Nano (it may be with other models, I can't test that), Windows may be assigning a drive letter that is already in use. This is particularly common for networked computers with mapped drives. For example, when I connected my Nano, I got the message above. No matter how many times I tried to restore it, I received the same message. Turns out, Windows was mapping the Nano to F:, which was already a mapped network drive in Windows. This is NOT a bug with the Nano or iTunes, it could happen to pretty much any removable drive. To fix this:
- Open Disk Manager (Right click on 'My Computer', select 'Manage', then select 'Disk Management' under 'Storage').
- Locate your iPod and right click on it. Select 'Change Drive Letter and Paths'.
- Remove the current drive letter assignment by clicking 'Remove'.
- Add a new drive letter assignment by selecting 'Add', and choosing an available drive letter that is not currently in use, and is not being used by another removable device.
On my computer, I have several removable drives, as well as several network mapped drives. My USB backup drive is B:, my thumb drive is T:, and now my iPod is I:. I don't know why I didn't think of this solution sooner.
If you need any help, reply here. I'll see what I can do.
Jimmy

I am still getting the same 'ipod in recovery mode' after trying this solution.
on my ipod it says there are 0 songs and 0 photos but there is only 46 MB of memory left out of the 856 available.
I have tried the method a couple of times and tried resetting the ipod many times but the same messages appear.
Help!! please

IPod not recognized by iTunes - Possible Solution for Networked Users

My shuffle was recognized by my PC, but not by iTunes. After much trial and error I stumbled onto an answer. My computer is part of a network with a local server. If I leave the iPod in the USB port and reboot, my computer won't be connected to the local network, but [Hallelujah!] iTunes now 'sees' the iPod and LIFE IS GOOD.
Hope this is helpful to someone.
Dell Windows XP iPod Shuffle; computer network

THANK YOU! I have been trying for several hours now to get my pc to recognize the iPOD Shuffle again. Thought it was due to iTunes update, tried the 5 R's etc. Your suggestions worked! I was connected to the network at work.

Speech recognition or other solution for FCP user with hand injuries?

Hi,
I work with final cut pro on a daily basis and have repetitive stress injuries on my hands/wrists from years of keyboard and mouse use. I was wondering if there is any way to use hands-free speech recognition software with a graphical program like fcp? Any other suggestions would be most welcome as well...
Thanks.

. I was wondering if
there is any way to use hands-free speech recognition
software with a graphical program like fcp?
Don't know about hands-free speech recognition, but I have a wacom tablet and pen that I love. Some people hate the pen but I love it. I allows free movement throughout the program with little effort of movement. It's also great for photoshop and After Effects when you're doing drawing type functions.
I'm assuming that you've seen a doctor and that you hand is being treated for injury. Correct?
Just a thought. My husband had carpal tunnel sydrome for months when a nasty hand injury forced surgery and they fixed the carpal tunnel while they were in there. Guys....

Solution for intermittent use of a single Adobe product?

I may be a unique case, because I do not want or really need all of the products that Adobe provides my for $30/month. Here is my dilemma:
I use Adobe illustrator infrequently, sometimes intensively for a month or so, but then I will not use it for the better part of a year. This is how I use the application.
So, I'm feel that being financially penalized for continuing to use Illustrator, since I pay for it every single month of my life, but use it infrequently. For example, if I use the program 20 times in 10 years (which is about how I do use it), then I am paying (according to the current student deal which I am sure will change in the coming 10 years time), $3600.00 over the course of 10 years to use the program 20 times. That works out to $180.00 per use.
Obviously I am not in good conscience able to renew my subscription with Adobe, and would have ended it earlier were it not for the severe financial penalty Adobe imposes on users for breaking a subscription contract before its official expiration.
Before I go, I just wonder if Adobe has any care for users such as myself. I know one unsatisfactory response already: I can by the full version, not get incremental updates, and will need to pay full price for each major upgrade. That's a bad deal too. How can a infrequent user of a single Adobe product (Illustrator) use the application for a reasonable amount of money? I don't need every Adobe product under the sun nor do I like the fact that somewhere in Adobe's hierarchy they think that is some kind of advantage to users. To me, that is product bloat, bordering on spam marketing.If I want a sip of water, I have to drink from the fire hydrant. This is so bone-headed.
I suppose, overall, I will advise my students to use what software the company they work for uses. But as far as a personal graphics package for independent work, I cannot recommend Adobe products anymore because of this pricing scheme, which really does penalize people who only use a product one in a while. But before I go, am I missing something? Is my assessment of this dilemma on target? I know I can no longer afford Adobe products, but I also want to advise my students in a way that is fair to them. Currently I am working on a module that shows all of the vector mapping graphics programs and breaks them down according to their feature set and cost for the user.
I've been using Adobe Illustrator for over two decades, and I will be sad to not have it available to me in the future, but this new business model and pricing structure no longer makes sense for me. Yes, considering the time and energy I've put into the program this is an emotional decision, but ending my relationship with Adobe is the healthy choice. It's like walking away from an abusive relationship of the passive-agressive variety. Adobe, what a drag!

On the face of it, the $30 for every monthly use seems like it might be a good solution for intermittent users. But, as a designers, I think many of us might like to take a brief look at an idea (sometimes just for the fun of it.) And so, if during one month I want to take a peek at some of my work with no real intention of doing any work, I would need to pay $30 to look at my own work. This kind of situation creates a kind of "double bind" for me. It's an uneasy feeling, having a kind of oppressive effect on the creative flow of ideas. Consider this case scenario: "I think I can improve that logo I did last summer. I wonder what this change would look like?" Well, to find out that will be $30.00. For me, that's an uncomfortable position. Again, thanks for the thoughtful reply.

I would like to suggest a Verizon-specific forum for Mac-users

Verizon is the largest provider of wireless and other related solutions. When I have problems with my Mac or supporting services I am consistently able to find solutions on either the Mac or Verizon forums. However, this takes quite a bit of effort to locate the right answer for my problem. And, this takes a lot of time.
I would like to harness solutions for Mac-users who are Verizon customers all in one place. This could make it easier for Mac-users to get quick answers. This could also be a great referral point for Verizon as it sorts out answers/solutions for Mac users.
Currently, Verizon hears from less than .05% of its customers that there are any issues of compatibility, less access to great services, needs for solutions for Mac. However Mac users represent at least 20% of computer users around the US. On the one hand you can infer that there are issues with less than .05% of the Mac universe or, on the other hand, you can infer that many just don't go to Verizon for the solutions.
I am not sure which is right. I just know that having solutions in one place, my Mac home, would be useful. I hope you will consider the idea.
I do realize no forums are dedicated to any one provider. However, Verizon, again, is the biggest provider. Maybe this is worthy of a forum.

Hi,
I this case I don't see the need to duplicate services that are independent and already out there
http://www.dslreports.com/forums/all for North America as a whole
This British one has ISP related forums as well as OS specific issue ones
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/
If I had Internet Connection problems and my ISP seemed unable to help me then I would look to those.
I am sure there are many that are also Language based all over the world or at least country based where a language is spoken in more than one part of the world.
It is about the level of question involved and some may already get answered in the "Getting On Line" and similar forums already here.
8:36 PM Tuesday; August 24, 2010
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"

Live video solution with VC3?

Hi,
I'm putting together a live video solution for someone, and looking into Visual Communicator as an option.
Does anyone know if it's possible to take a number of webcam inputs (four, for example) into the computer, record all the streams individually as they are to hard disk, but also live switch the inputs out to a screen?
Most solutions I'm finding can only record the live-switched/edited stream. I need to record them as they are (four separate complete streams) but also output to a projector a live-switched version.
Anyone know is this is possible?
Thanks,
S

Welcome to our community, Steve
While Visual Communicator *MIGHT* be able to do this (and I'll leave that for Rob Z or another to answer) you might investigate a freeware product called Screen Monkey.
Click here to visit the Screen Monkey site
I've been using Screen Monkey quite successfully at the church I attend and volunteer by operating the media PC. Granted, I'm only switching between a single camera feed and PowerPoint presentation, but if you had multiple video streams I believe Screen Monkey would allow you to manage that too.
Screen Monkey won't do anything with recording the separate feeds though. You will likely need another software for that. I might imagine it would severely tax the computer to try and record as many as four webcam feeds. But one possibility is to connect multiple computers with each having its own video feed and recording and feed their outputs into the main computer where you are operating the live show.
Cheers and best of luck to you! Rick

Cost solution for new energy insdustry like wind & sun power

We are proposing the solution to a new energy customer based on EBS, and we need to know about the cost management and solution for this industry.
The customer focuses on wind & sun power and fuel cell.
Can you share any documents for that?
Thanks...........

On the face of it, the $30 for every monthly use seems like it might be a good solution for intermittent users. But, as a designers, I think many of us might like to take a brief look at an idea (sometimes just for the fun of it.) And so, if during one month I want to take a peek at some of my work with no real intention of doing any work, I would need to pay $30 to look at my own work. This kind of situation creates a kind of "double bind" for me. It's an uneasy feeling, having a kind of oppressive effect on the creative flow of ideas. Consider this case scenario: "I think I can improve that logo I did last summer. I wonder what this change would look like?" Well, to find out that will be $30.00. For me, that's an uncomfortable position. Again, thanks for the thoughtful reply.

Audio & Video Call Recording Solution for CUCM

Hi,
I am looking for a audio and video call recording solution for CUCM. The requirement is the recording system shall record all audio & video calls including incoming, outgoing, and station-to-station calls. One cirtical requirement is: The users on the CUCM system shall be able to record video calls for video equipped stations with a push of a button on their Cisco IP Desk set or their Cisco soft phone.
Does anyone know the product or third party vendor who supports audio and video recording for CUCM?
-Thanks
Vaijanath

Currently Cisco doesn't support video recording with a push of a button on their Cisco IP Desk set or their Cisco soft phone. Also, I have checked with the third party vendors and they only support the video recording using Passive Call recording (port mirroring).
http://www.verba.com/cisco-call-recording-solutions

Single server solution for video surveillance

Do we have a single server solution for Cisco video surveillance? Something similar to the Business Edition 6000 series in unified communications.
If yes, please provide information.
Thanks in advance

Cisco VSM can be used as single server solution depending upon your requirement. you could install Management server (which manages recordings) and VSOM (Operation Manager which manages you user profile and user interface) on a single server.
please refer to below doc for more info.
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/security/physical_security/video_surveillance/network/vsm/7_0/srnd/vsm_7_0_srnd.pdf

Solutions for previewing HDV via video monitors ?

I have recently been given the task of setting up a video editing suite combining:
FCP6
HVR-1500 decks
Panasonic BT-LH1700WE LCD video monitors
FX7E HDV cameras
I've read that it is not possible to preview HDV via firewire and this seems to be the case thus rendering the Video preview monitors useless via the decks at least.
My question is what would we need to get in order to get a live broadcast preview to the monitors ?
Many thanks in advance.
-matt

Ok so i've done a little research and it seems like The Matrox MXO would be the best solution for our needs.
Does anybody have any experiance with this or a similar output device ?

A video solution for Adium user's

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for