Abandoned calls in IVR Campaign
IVR Outbound Camnapign.
Settings:
"Cisco Config Manager" --> "Outbound Option Campaign" --> "Abandoned call waiting time" =10 sec.
To the person the call arrives (from IVR Campaign), the person hears the first IVR prompt, further in 5 seconds the abonent dropped call.
The system marks such call as "Customer answered and was connected to agent" (code 10)
It is necessary for me to receive a code:
"Customer has been abandoned to an IVR (code 21)"
It important for this purpose that the system would redial.
How it is correct for settings?
ICM 7.2.7
IPIVR 3
CCM 4
Hi all,
Sorry for attending late this interesting topic. I also have concern about this issuse. We found it difficult to manage the answerer's attitude. We cannot point out how many calls that were not answer at the a specific IP phone ( the call that had ring out at that IP phone).
If you can, pls clarify the meaning of: Calls Error concept.
*Completed Tasks: Calls Error
The number of calls for this Call Type that had errors or were incomplete during the half-hour interval.
Derived from: Call_Type_Half_Hour.ErrorCountToHalf + Call_Type_Half_Hour.IncompleteCallsHalf + Call_Type_Half_Hour.AgentErrorCountToHalf
Are there any differences between Aban Call and Calls Error?
Aban Ring
For voice: the total number of calls that were abandoned while the agent’s phone was ringing. For non-voice: the total number of tasks that were abandoned while being offered to an agent.
Derived from: Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour.AbandonRingCallsToHalf
Aban Hold
The number of ICM routed calls to the agent that abandoned while the call was on hold and/or the number of paused tasks that the agent ended during the interval.
Derived from: Agent_Skill_Group_Half_Hour.AbandonHoldCallsToHalf
many thks
Similar Messages
-
21 CallResult in DL Table for ICM Outbound option IVR Campaign
Greetings!
I have a problem in IVR Campaign. Every successful call (from my point of view) which it makes ended with 21 Result code, no matter whether the message was heard fully or just some part of it but longer than 5 seconds. And as a consequence, the campaign calls as long as it reaches maximum of retries. Even if I set the value of Abandoned call wait time to 0 the behavior doesn't change. Where can be the problem ?
Thanks in advance for your answers!Hi Yuri,
Can you please provide one failed call logs with the below traces.
Dialer:
Using registry editor set
- EMSTraceMask= 1F (hex)
- EMSUserData= FFFF (hex)
Campaign Manager:
Using registry editor set
- EMSTraceMask= FFFF (hex)
Note: please revert the trace levels once log collection completes
Regards,
Sasikumar. -
Increased number of Abandoned calls
Hi All
We have a Severity 1 case going on and its that we are getting huge number of abandoned calls in UCCX and on a particual CSQ.
Both the CUCM and UCCX team confirmed that there are no issues at therespective entities and the issue is from the Voice Gateway.
this is the log of an abandoned call from the gateway, could anyone check this and let me know what could causing this trouble,
10:19:28.027 H.225 0x1BEE SETUP RX <-- 10.10.60.1
SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x1BEE
Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
Transfer Capability: Speech, Transfer Mode: Circuit Mode , Transfer Rate: 64 Kbps, Layer 1 Protocol: G.711 A-law
Calling Party Number i = '!', 0x80, '719737099100'
Called Party Number i = 0x80, '9883'
User-User i = 0x6505
IE out of order or end of private IEs --
Net Specific Fac i = 0x060008914A00042800B500001240013C05010000AA77CF89295F11E08FB5002497792C2000CD1D820007000A0A3C019AA01100AA7907D9295F11E0879EDCB5C11AB5586704130000000C2013800B050001000A0A3C0141ED001E400000060401004C20138012150001000A0A3C0141EC000A0A3C0141ED00130000010C601380
IE out of order or end of private IEs --
UNRECOGNIZED VARIABLE (0x0B) i = 0x0001000A0A
UNRECOGNIZED VARIABLE (0x3C) i = 0x41
IE 0xED
IE out of order or end of private IEs --
Segmented Message i = 0x400001060401004C60138012150001000A0A3C0141EC000A0A3C0141ED00
UNRECOGNIZED VARIABLE: 0x01 i =
UNRECOGNIZED VARIABLE: 0x01 i =
UNRECOGNIZED VARIABLE: 0x01 i = 0x0180010010A8018080F30140B500001280EBE0010200010480DA04038090A21803A983811E0285836C0C218039373337303939313030700580393838331CB59E810003677464000000AA49414D2C0D0A50524E2C6973646E2A2C2C4E492A2A2A2C0D0A5553492C726174652C632C732C632C310D0A5553492C6C6179312C756C
UNRECOGNIZED VARIABLE (0x61) i = 0x0D0A544D522C30300D0A43504E2C30302C2C752C393838330D0A43474E2C30342C2C312C792C312C393733373039393130300D0A4350432C30390D0A4643492C2C2C2C2C2C2C792C0D0A4743492C61613737636638393239356631316530386662353030323439373739326332300D0A0D0A0A80060004
IE out of order or end of private IEs --
Segmented Message i =
Segmented Message i = 0x80B242
Bearer Capability i = 0x74640180AA49414D2C0D0A50524E2C6973646E2A2C2C4E492A2A2A2C0D0A5553492C726174652C632C732C632C310D0A5553492C6C6179312C756C61770D0A544D522C30300D0A43504E2C30302C2C752C393838330D0A43474E2C30342C2C312C792C312C3937
Non CCITT Coding Standard!, trying to decode anyway. Transfer Capability: RESERVED information transfer capability! , Transfer Mode: RESERVED Information Transfer Rate! RESERVED layer 1 protocol code!
UNRECOGNIZED VARIABLE (0x33) i = 0x3039393130300D0A4350432C30390D0A4643492C2C2C2C2C2C2C792C0D0A4743492C616137376366383932393566313165303866623530
IE out of order or end of private IEs --
UNRECOGNIZED VARIABLE (0x30) i = 0x3439373739326332300D0A0D0A
Decode Error: IE Length Error (0x32)
10:19:28.039 H.225 0x9BEE CALL_PROC TX --> 10.10.60.1
10:19:28.069 H.225 0x9BEE ALERTING TX --> 10.10.60.1
10:19:28.070 H.225 0x9BEE NOTIFY TX --> 10.10.60.1
10:19:28.127 H.225 0x9BEE CONNECT TX --> 10.10.60.1
10:19:28.128 H.225 0x9BEE NOTIFY TX --> 10.10.60.1
10:19:31.786 H.225 0x1BEE RELEASE_COMP RX <-- 10.10.60.1
RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x1BEE
Cause i = 0x8290 - Normal call clearing
User-User i = 0x052580060008914A000411001100AA7907D9295F11E0879EDCB5C11AB55810A801003A0140B5000012336001020001082C080282901C269E8100036774640000001B52454C2C0D0A50524E2C6973646E2A2C2C4E492A2A2A2C0D0A0D0A224204677464011B52454C2C0D0A50524E2C6973646E2A2C2C4E492A2A2A2C0D0A0D0A
Thanks
AbrahamThis is too broad of a question. Where are the calls abandoning? Is it in queue or in the IVR? Have your hold times increased? Have your agent metrics chaged which might cause poor customer service?
david -
I realised an anomaly which occurred in the system whereby we still have abandoned calls even when the phone is not ringing.
Most of them are coming from general line e.g 1234. Could it be because it takes too long for the call from general line 1234 to be routed to CISCO?
This issue has been a daily nuisance for us. Customer complaint is also on the rise.
Any idea what to look into? im clueless to troubleshoot
Thanks
MarzukiHi Tanner Ezell,
I'm not sure what u meant by queue abandon or application abandon. is this as what i understand as below?
"Application abandon" means The callers who have dialed the Contact Center number, the IVR responded with a welcome message and eventually some pre-recorded prompts. Customers who choose to close the line at this level (they did not speak to an agent) are considered as abandoned in IVR.
As for "queue abandon", those are the callers who have heard the welcome message, and then heard pre-recorded messages, navigated in the IVR menu and selected the option to speak to an agent. The call is now transferred to the Queue. If all the agents are busy, then the caller will hear the Hold Music. If there's an available agent, the customer will speak to the agent. Customer who close the line while listening to the Hold Music are considered as abandoned in queue (or "router queue" in UCCE terminology). -
Hello All,
We have a small Call Center Express , with just one Queue .. the version is 10.5.1-11001_49
The main request for the customer was as follows :
For the CSQ get below :
Calls Presented
Calls Handled
Calls Abandoned
IVR Abandoned
Agent Abandoned
Inside the CUIC for the CCX , we can get the Calls Presented , and Total of Calls Abandoned .. we can’t get which calls are Abandoned inside IVR ( i.e : before reaching any Agent .. just the customer was waiting in Queue , then he choose to drop the call ) ..
also for Agents , i.e: Calls were abandoned after getting presented to Agents ( there is no Auto Answer ) , and the RNA time is 12 seconds
Reports where used for getting the calls are :
Contact Service Queue Activity Report ( where it shows Total Presented , Total Abandoned )
Abandoned Call Detail Activity Report ( where it shows Abandoned calls with respect to Agents )
So , now with example from the customer DB :
CSQ Activity Report give below details :Total Presented : 5778
Handled : 5409
Abandoned : 369
We tried get more details for the Abandoned calls from the Abandoned Call Detail Activity Report, and we got only 66 calls Abandoned inside that report …
Does that mean the rest of Abandoned calls are Abandoned in IVR ? , 369 – 66 = 303 Calls
Does anyone know the correct way of getting those Abandoned IVR calls ?
Thanks a lot ,
Ahmed SalahHello Aaron,
Thanks for the reply ...
i have done some testing on LAB , to figure out the analogy .. and below is the output :
To explain , the Abandoned calls can be summarized to below :
Abandoned Application : The Caller called the System Number , then heard the Welcome message .. and Closed the Call , he was NOT offered to be Queued Yet ..
Abandoned Queue : The Caller called the System Number, heard the Welcome message , and he selected proper choices to reach agent , but all were busy , so he waited in Queue .. then Closed the Call … he was NOT offered to an Agent Yet
Abandoned Agent : The Caller called the System Number, heard the Welcome message , and he selected proper choices to reach agent , and Agent XXXX was reserved , and during the Ring Time , the Caller closed the call .. he was NOT talking with the Agent .
Now to get the 3 types using One report , I would suggest : Detailed Call CSQ Agent Report .. , and to use it as below :
Before running the Report , filter it with only one Filter inside CUIC : Called Number (@param4) , and choose the Trigger Number for the Application, then Run the Report
Now you can extract the report , and work only on the Call Disposition value of “1” , which is “Abandoned”
You should see output like below :
Note : I simulated some calls on the Lab , with same version of UCCX as installed on your premises “10.5.1.11001-49” , and Agent is called : Agent 1
The calls with Values in Application Name only >> Abandoned Application , Yellow
The calls with Values in Application Name , and CSQ Names >> Abandoned Queue , Purple
The calls with Value in Application Name , CSQ Names , and Agent Name >> Abandoned Agent , Red
Now if I run the report with “Contact Service Queue Activity” , I should expect calls to be matched with above data ,
And to be specific , the data should match the case where values in Application Name , CSQ Names , AT LEAST , so it will match both “Purple , Red “ ,.. which are 9 calls
I hope this could help others .. :)
Thanks a lot ,
Ahmed Salah -
IPCCX Historical reporting abandoned calls inconsistency.
We have an inconsistency with the number of abandoned calls reported for one particular CSQ.
If a HR is generated, 0 abandoned calls are reported ( almost a thousand calls handled), if I use the real time report statistics it shows several abandoned calls.
Are there any known issues which give these symptoms, bearing in mind it seems to only be effecting one particular CSQ.
Regards
ChrisYou can account for this if you use the On Exception Goto steps carefully.
For standard IVR scenarios you add the On Exception Goto (ContactInactiveException) at the start of your script. At the destination label you add an On Exception Clear step followed by Set Contact Info to mark the contact as Handled.
For CSQ scenarios you do not include the Set Contact Info step at the destination label. That way if the contact abandons while queued they are marked accordingly.
If you have a script that includes IVR and CSQ functionality you can switch back and forth where appropriate. Here's a very rough example:
Start
On Exception Goto (ContactInactiveException) DISCONNECT_END_CLEAN
Accept
...ivr steps...
Select Resource
-Connected
--Goto END
-Queued
--On Exception Clear (ContactInactiveException)
--On Exception Goto (ContactInactiveException) DISCONNECT_END_ABANDONED
--...queued steps...
...other logic, such as closed steps...
Label: DISCONNECT_END_ABANDONED
On Exception Clear (ContactInactiveException)
Goto DISCONNECT_END_FINAL
Label: DISCONNECT_END_CLEAN
On Exception Clear (ContactInactiveException)
Set Contact Info: Handled
Goto DISCONNECT_END_FINAL
Label: DISCONNECT_END_FINAL
Disconnect
Label: END
End
Finally, if you have a script with IVR and CSQ but you only want to count the contact as abandoned until they reach a certain point in the IVR or are answered by an agent, you just add more steps at each point this decision changes. This is only two steps:
On Exception Clear (ContactInactiveException)
On Exception Goto (ContactInactiveException) NEW_LABEL
This allows you to change whether the caller is counted as abandoned or not at any point that is significant. -
Run special script for abandon calls
Sample: If the call has been stopped at the initiative of the client after 40 seconds of stay of a call in system (that is the client looked forward to hearing more than 40 seconds, and has hanged up, without having waited)We can call any IVR/ICM the Script?
I'm with David on the first part: Your question is difficult to understand. I'll take a couple guesses at the answer you might be looking for. Please clarify if you still need help.
1) It IS possible to run further/additional scripts if a caller hangs up but this requires a good understanding of the scripting engine. You can use exception handling to recover from the caller abandoning and then move to another point in the script or call another script entirely. If you called another application and accompanying script (instead of calling a script as a sub flow) you would need to use a session to move useful variable data to the other application. Again, this is possible but you need to know CCX well before attempting this, in my opinion.
2) You could use the Get Reporting Statistic step to retrieve the estimated wait time for the CSQ prior to the caller abandoning. This would allow you to offer them other options. An example would be "If the estimated wait time is more than one minute, offer them an option to leave a voice mail." The estimated wait time statistic has some caveats though so I would recommend reading the documentation on it carefully first. -
Hi all,
I setup outbound option in Cisco ICM 7.2 which is based in IVR campaign transfer. But when the customer takes the outbound call, the IVR messages only plays after 5 seconds.
Anybody know why?
ThucHi,
are you sure it's 5 seconds? Seems a bit long.
Actually, the ICM Dialer needs some time to detect whether there's a living person on the other side of the line.
For instance, in Russia, when someone receives a call, he says 'Da' (Yes). This might be too short, so the ICM still waits. But if the same person says 'Hello' or a longer expression, the ICM detects it immediately.
G. -
No ANI for Dialer IVR campaigns but present every where else.
Hi,
I'm running ICM 7.5 with CVP 7.5.
I have a few Dialer IVR campaigns and I'm not getting the ANI passed on to CVP.
I'm getting it in the t_Termination_Call_Detail table and in the Dialer_Detail table but for some reason it doesn't seem to present when the call makes it to the CVP script.
on an ICM SET node i'm doing:
variable: user.microapp.ToExtVXML[]
array index: 2
value: concatenate("ani=",Call.CallingLineID,";dnis=",Call.DialedNumberString)
On the CVP side I'm set to receive it as a session data.
I get a value for dnis and I'm using this same process in my inbound scripts and it works but for some reason it doesn't work for the dialer IVR scripts.
thanksGot it. I'll test that now.
I'm new to CVP so let me ask you something just so I can understand better:
Before you said to "
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
Don't use a wait node as that is unsupported in CVP" but if this is to be done before it gets to CVP, how does using an ICM Wait node affect the CVP application?
thanks -
Transfer to IVR campaign fails in UCCE 10.5
Hi guys,
I have a problem with a "Transfer to IVR" campaign in UCCE 10.5.
I have a "Transfer to agents" campaign working fine but I can't manage the other one. In "Transfer to IVR" campaign the customer is called but the dialer does not transfer the call to IVR when the call is answered.
As far as I found on this forum I have to do a Translation Route between MR PG and VRU, but I wasn't able to find a good doc to follow.
I configured one Translation Route as in the following picture but the router return "Labels = 0".
The router log:
22:59:45:266 rb-rtr Trace: (64 x 0 : 0 0) NewCall: CID=(151270,312), DN=1234, ANI=0XXXXXXXXX, CED=, RCID=5002, MRDID=1, CallAtVRU=1, OpCode=0.
22:59:45:266 rb-rtr Trace: RCKSeqNum=-1, NIC_DN=.
22:59:45:266 rb-rtr Trace: CallType(5013, 118): Init CT_SL_Timer: Threshold(20 + 2)..
22:59:45:267 rb-rtr Trace: (64 x 0 : 0 0) RouteComplete:.
22:59:45:267 rb-rtr Trace: Route: CID=(151270,312), Labels=0.
22:59:45:267 rb-rtr Trace: CallType(5013, 118): Deleting CT_SL_Timer..
22:59:45:267 rb-rtr Trace: (64 x 0 : 0 0) Dialog sending release call message to Routing Client ID(5002)..
22:59:45:267 rb-rtr Trace: (64 x 0 : 0 0) Deleting Dialog..
The call hangs in Translation Route to VRU step:
Any idea where can be the problem in this scenario?
Any help will be highly appreciated,
CristianIn Translation route configuration I see
1. your route is associated with a service which is configured with MRPG.Change it to VRU PG.
2. In your case the routing client for label is CCM PG, change it to MRPG. I m attaching the screenshot from my lab. hope it will help you. -
Increase in Abandoned Calls in UCCX
Hello All,
We have an issue going on with a huge number of Abandoned calls. Pleas check one call log below and assist me in this.
Logs from Voice Gateway
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161621: 51886529: Feb 1 07:53:00.468: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Received SETUP callref = 0x815D callID = 0x1B5A switch = primary-ni interface = User
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161622: 51886530: Feb 1 07:53:00.476: //-1/1FEFD3DA9ACB/CCAPI/cc_api_display_ie_subfields:
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161623: cc_api_call_setup_ind_common:
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161624: cisco-username=
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161625: ----- ccCallInfo IE subfields -----
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161626: cisco-ani=4142712700
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161627: cisco-anitype=2
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161628: cisco-aniplan=1
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161629: cisco-anipi=0
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161630: cisco-anisi=0
2011-02-01 02:53:07 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139161631: dest=9884
2011-02-01 02:53:08 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139163070: 51886795: Feb 1 07:53:01.268: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x015D
2011-02-01 02:53:08 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139163040: 51886782: Feb 1 07:53:01.256: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x815D
2011-02-01 02:53:08 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139163082: 51886804: Feb 1 07:53:01.284: //3035952/1FEFD3DA9ACB/CCAPI/cc_api_call_disconnect_done:
2011-02-01 02:53:08 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139163083: Disposition=0, Interface=0x4B9E2C28, Tag=0x0, Call Id=3035952,
2011-02-01 02:53:08 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139163084: Call Entry(Disconnect Cause=16, Voice Class Cause Code=0, Retry Count=0)
2011-02-01 02:53:08 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139163085: 51886805: Feb 1 07:53:01.284: //3035952/1FEFD3DA9ACB/CCAPI/cc_api_call_disconnect_done:
2011-02-01 02:53:08 Local7.Debug 10.10.60.1 139163086: Call Disconnect Event Sent
Logs from CUCM SDI
Line 713: 02/01/2011 02:53:00.530 CCM|LineControl(13050) - Get call instance=1 for CI=32077754|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,100,152,1.1><IP::10.10.60.1><DEV::><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.547 CCM|ConnectionManager - wait_AuDisconnectRequest ERROR:NO ENTRY FOUND IN TABLE,CI(32077754,0),dcType=1,IFCreated(0,0),PID(0-0,0-0),IFHandling(0,0),MCNode(0,0)|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Error><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.547 CCM|LineCdpc(685973): -dispatchToAllDevices-, sigName=CcDisconnReq, device=Spoken_9884|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.547 CCM|StationD(135409): StationCtiD - CcDisconnReq onBehalfOf=CCtiLine Cause=0 tmpAe.ci=32077754|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.547 CCM|StationD(135409): StationCtiD - CcDisconnReq Cause=0|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.548 CCM|StationCdpc(696849): StationCtiCdpc - CcDisconnReq CH=1|32077754 mSavedCcDisconnReq=0xb16f8ac0 ReasonForRedirection=18 OnBehalfOf=CCtiLine CauseVal=0|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Significant><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.548 CCM|StationCdpc(696849): StationCtiCdpc - CcDisconnReq CH=1|32077754 mSavedCcDisconnReq=0xb16f8ac0 ReasonForRedirection=18 OnBehalfOf=CCtiLine CauseVal=0|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.548 CCM|StationCdpc(696849): StationCtiCdpc - DStopInd CH=1|32077754 mSavedCcDisconnReq=0xb16f8ac0 CmSsFeature=7 ReasonForRedirection=18 OnBehalfOf=CCtiLine CallReason=6 CallState=1|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Significant><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.548 CCM|StationCdpc(696849): StationCtiCdpc - DStopInd CH=1|32077754 mSavedCcDisconnReq=0xb16f8ac0 CmSsFeature=7 ReasonForRedirection=18 OnBehalfOf=CCtiLine CallReason=6 CallState=1|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.548 CCM|StationCdpc(696849): StationCtiCdpc - GenerateCallStateEvent CH=1|32077754 CallState=1 CmSsFeature=7 CallReason=6 CallStateChangeCause=0 RIU=0 CallSelectStatus=0 AuxiliaryData=0 Privacy=0 Feature=137 LRP=8137 LRPName= callingPartyIPAddr=0x13c0a0a|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Significant><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.548 CCM|StationCdpc(696849): StationCtiCdpc - GenerateCallStateEvent CH=1|32077754 CallState=1 CmSsFeature=7 CallReason=6 CallStateChangeCause=0 RIU=0 CallSelectStatus=0 AuxiliaryData=0 Privacy=0 Feature=137 LRP=8137 LRPName= callingPartyIPAddr=0x13c0a0a|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800>
|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Error><MASK::0020>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.549 CCM|deleteCi: Unable to find the device that owns the call with CI=|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800>
02/01/2011 02:53:00.549 CCM|LineControl(13050) - Release call instance=1 for CI=32077754|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.10.60.250><CT::1,200,15,1.1687635><IP::10.10.60.2><DEV::Spoken_9884><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800>Hi
Are scripts configured to redirect calls outside UCCX ?
Then make sure these are set to consult transfers. Normally if they are not set that way reports show those calls as abandoned.
Hope This helps
Anuj -
UCCX 9.0(2) - CUIC Reports Call Abandoned calls inconsistencies
Hi,
We are finding that the there are inconsistencies in the abandons figures shown for a CSQ report for 'Contact Service Queue Activity Report' and the calls that are shown in the 'Abandoned Call Detail Activity Report'.
For example if I view a CSQ in 'Contact Service Queue Activity Report' I see that there are 18 calls abandon today with 9 dequeued. However I when run 'Abandoned Call Detail Activity Report', I can only see 4 calls showing for that CSQ. Before I got to TAC with this has anyone else seen this?Hello Saeed, Kiarash,
Page 212 on this document explains why.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_7_0/programmin...
Q.Why do the number of abandoned calls shown on the Abandoned Call Detail Activity Report and the number of calls shown on the Contact Service Queue Activity Report not match?
A.These values can differ because a Contact Queue Detail record may mark a call as dequeued while a Contact Call Detail record marks the call as abandoned. For example, consider the following workflow:
Start
Accept
Prompt
Select Resource
-Connect
-Queue
--Play Prompt (Prompt2)
--Dequeue
--Play Prompt (Prompt3)
End
If a call is abandoned during Prompt2 or Prompt3, the Contact Queue Detail record will mark the call as dequeued but not abandoned from any queue. The Contact Call Detail record will mark the call abandoned.
In this case, the Contact Service Queue Activity Report will show the call as dequeued from all CSQs for which the call was routed. The Abandoned Call Detail Activity Report will show the call as abandoned from all from all CSQs for which the call was routed.
Another reason is that the call gets aborted after being in the queue.
Such calls get marked as aborted in the Contact Call Detail record, and as dequeued (if it was dequeued before aborting)/abandoned in Contact Queue Detail record. In this case the CSQ reports will display more abandoned calls than the Abandoned Call Detail Activity Report.
Thank you,
Shadi -
Calculating abandoned calls in CUCCX 8
Hello,
I suspect that this is an frequently asked question; why am I getting a different number for calls abandoned on the Cisco Supervisor statistics than in Cisco Historical reports? In Historical Reports the number apears to be greater than in the Cisco Supervisor Desktop. This is a very plain, vanilla CSQ implementation, just wondering why there's a difference?Most commonly there is a misunderstanding of what is really being reported for the different reports. What report are you referring to in the history reports and how does that relate to what you are looking at in supervisor desktop?
There are good reasons why reports will show different values and the difference is most always found in what is actually being reported per the specific report. It's very hard for this reason to match a RTR with a historical report because they are coming up with the numbers (in this example abandoned calls) in a different way and for a different purpose.
For example:
Say in the Supervisor RTR you are looking at abandoned calls for the Team 'Sales' and in the Historical reports you are looing at the Abandoned Calls Summary Report looking at the Sales CSQ. It may seem like the same thing but one is reporting on a "team" and the other is reporting on a CSQ.
So check to see what is being reported on first. Here is the documentation for the historical reports. Chapter 3 is where you want to look.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_8_0/user/guide/uccx801HRug.pdf
Then if you still believe there is some difference please post back with some details about the difference to help us isolate what may be happening. Screenshots, attaching a report, etc... -
Hello,
I have a helpdesk that wants a abandoned calls report. They want to know where in the process the calls are dropped - but they want to know where they are dropped before they get to a CSQ (they have a complicated menu)
Is there any way to make a script in order to reflect this in the reports?I haven't tried this, but it seems logical to work.
At each step in the menu, have the call placed into a queue, such as "HelpDeskStep1", "HelpDeskStep2", etc. Theoretically, when you run your abandoned call report, it should show you which "queue" the call was in when it abandoned. But again, I haven't built this out to try it, so not sure if it will work in production. -
UCCX 8.5 Abandoned Calls Notification
Hi Team!!!
I have a UCCX cluster version 8.5, and I'm interested in notify to agents the abandoned calls, sending a e-mail or by other way.
Can some one help?
Thank youHi,
Do you have a wallboard ? If yes, you can display this parameter along with other parameters on the wallboard.
Also you can check for free of charge wallboard as discussed in the below thread.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/1042045#1042045
Hope it helps.
Anand
Please rate helpful posts !!
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I install the plug in version of flash player
how do I install the plug in version of flash player Why is the plug in version not listed
-
I show about 10,00 messages. Have no need for those more than 12 months old. How do I cleat them?
-
Different Sizes with same file.
Hi All, I have made 2 post script files from 1 indesign file, but the trap setting I have used to make for both Post Script file was: 1. Application In-Rip 2. Adobe In-Rip My questions are : 1. Is there any diffrence between these settings? 2. Why th
-
My Timesheet Fiori App - Adding 2 new fields
Hello All, I need to add 2 new field in the fiori timesheet application for week entry view and for the same I have to enhance the OData so I have appended the custom structure in "SRA002_S_TIMEDATA_ENTITY_INCL" with 2 new fields. Next I need to enha
-
Plant wise Pricing procedure determination
Hi All, Can anyone suggest me, If we put plant 1007 in sales order then system will consider ZMRPD Pricing Procedure and If we dont put 1007 then system consider normal pricing procedure ZXMBP. How it can be possible ? Thanks JJ