"Abbreviation for status not maintained"
what does this JCO error mean:
"Abbreviation for status not maintained"
Message was edited by:
reza etemadi
Hi Pallavi,
Whenever you create a multi provider, to activate it successfully, right click on each of the key figures and click on Select (assign). This helps you determine which sources you want to consider while creating the multi provider for each of the key figures.
For example, your multiprovider is taking fields from both a DSO and a CUBE. So, by assigning you can mention which values to pull into the multiprovider, from the DSO? CUBE? or both.
Once you assign the source/sources to each of the key figures in the multi provider, you will be able to activate it successfully.
Similar Messages
-
OCI Catalog for Vendor problem : Logical system for catalog not maintained
We have set up an OCI catalog with on of our vendors. This works fine untill we transfer shopping basket data from Vendor sysem into our SRM-system (SRM5.0). Then data is not being transfered and Vendor Webshop screen remains 'open'.
in SLG1 i have found an error "Logical system for catalog not maintained. Inform system administrator'
Anyone an idea what the cause of this error can be or what we need to check ?
Thanks in advanceHi,
I have not seen that error before. However, I think it may have to do with the LOGICAL_SYSTEM OCI field. Can you check if your punch-out catalog vendor is populating that field? Also, check if you have the correct BP# populated in the catalog configuration and the LOGICAL SYSTEM Field on the define External Webservices is blank.
SG -
MD04 Problem(MRP Parameters for plant not maintained)
Sir in tcode MD04 i am getting error message no. 61273 (MRP Parameters for plant not maintained).What to do?
i am online.Hi
Maintain plant parameters in T code : OPPQ
or copy plant properly
Tarachand -
Error in Costing for Routing not maintained
Dear Experts
We are working on ECC6.0, creating Material Cost Estimates with Quantity Structure.
The issue is we want the system to give error when Routing is not maintained for the Inhouse Materials.
I've seen system only issues msg CK 461 as a warning message when executing CK11.
This message moreover doesnt exist in Costing Error management.
I'd tried adding this message in OBMSG ans then maintaing it as error in OBA5 but still it is displayed as warning.
I've searched threads but didnt get any relevant results.
Please suggest a way out.
Regards
KapilDear Christian
Message CK 229 works but only if the routing is not maintained.
But if the routing is maintained but without operation, then system issues message CK 461 which seems is not configurable.
Can you suggest if an error can be given for such a case.
Regards
Kapil -
Assignmet for infoobject not maintained
Hi all,
I am trying to create a Multiprovider with a DSO & an INFOCUBE
I have added the dimensions & the keyfigures.
The infoobjects under the UNIT dimensions(0Currency & 0Unit) are not getting added automatically.
Inspite of that I tried to activate the multiprovider.
Now its throwing the error :
Assignment for infoobject CST_ITEM not maintained --> long text
Assignment for infoobject ORD_DAT not maintained --> long text
But now I can view 0currency & 0Unit under Unit dimention. But they appear blue in color.
& I am still getting the error.
How can I resolve the issue?Hi Pallavi,
Whenever you create a multi provider, to activate it successfully, right click on each of the key figures and click on Select (assign). This helps you determine which sources you want to consider while creating the multi provider for each of the key figures.
For example, your multiprovider is taking fields from both a DSO and a CUBE. So, by assigning you can mention which values to pull into the multiprovider, from the DSO? CUBE? or both.
Once you assign the source/sources to each of the key figures in the multi provider, you will be able to activate it successfully. -
Preference status not changed for the processed products
Hello All,
While Aggregating the vendor declaration, I am getting the message as below
Preference status not changed for the processed products
Could you please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards
RahulHello Rahul,
aggregation is not changing status on LTVD. (Possibly LTVD has been already agregated). Newly maintained LTVD is not changing status of the product, its remaining negative whatsoever.
Kr,
Gabriel. -
Tables can be maintained even though Client has status 'not modifiable" ?
I am looking, list of tables which i can maintain directly even though "Client has status 'not modifiable'" status
example : T000
RgdsNo ..No...Siddesh,
You are understanding my requirement in reverse.
We are now not in execution of giving the access.
i regret, if i am failing to explain my requirement
A Auditor wants
a). He wanted to know the users having S_TABU_DIS auth object with 02 value and assigned authroization groups.
b). He wanted list of tables including Z tables that can be maintained directly thru maintenance view
Auditor will do some excerse Directly Maintained Tables (vs) Authroized users
He will come back with a list of tables for which we have to give the logs.
I tried my best to explain my requirement.
To summarise - I repeat i am looking "List of Tables that can be maintained directly - When Client has status 'not modifiable" ?
Thanks in advance for your time for this query.
Rgds -
Close shop order Fiscal year variant B2 is not maintained for calendar year
Hello,
I know there are already some threads in the forum about this error, but I could not find an answer that works for me.
Here is the scenario:
We do want to close a production order in CO02. (CO02-functions-restrict processing-close).
I get an error message u201CUnprocessed future change recs for order xxprevent del. flag/completionu201D
Message no. CO688
Transaction COFC shows me 6 errors (all the same) for this production order, I guess this might be the reason for the previous error:
u201CFiscal year variant B2 is not maintained for calendar year 2006u201D
When I now go into OB29, it shows entries for B2 for the year 2006, it has 12 periods, so it looks fine for me.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Anne- check out this note
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=487683
Note 487683 - CO688 for 'complete technically' or set deletion flag
Symptom
An order should be technically completed or the deletion flag should be activated for the order.
The action cannot be carried out since the system issues error message CO688 "Unprocessed future change recs for order & prevent deletion flag/completion".
Even after you have started report CORUPROC for processing the unprocessed future change records, the action cannot be carried out.
Other terms
Archiving, complete technically,
LÖVM, TABG, CO688, CO 688
Reason and Prerequisites
The action cannot be carried out since there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual costs for the order.However, this option is not mentioned in the long text of message CO688.
Solution
With the aid of Transactions COGI and COFC, you must check whether there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual costs for the order and you must post-process them.
You can change the long text of the message as follows by using Transaction SE91 in order to add missing information:
Diagnosis
For the order, you must still process future change records or error records from the confirmation for confirmation processes.These are the possible confirmation processes:
automatic goods receipt
backflush
actual cost determination
data transfer to HR
System activities
For orders with confirmation processes to be post-processed, setting of the deletion flag or of status 'completed' has not been planned.
Procedure
You must process the unprocessed future change records with the help of
predefined confirmation processes</> or
with the aid of program CORUPROC, when you dispatch it in Customizing in a background job (dispatch background jobs: confirmation processes).
You must check whether there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual cost determination for the order and you might have to post-process them:
post-processing of incorrect goods movements</>
post-processing of incorrect actual cost determinations</> -
Error Valuation & is not maintained for material & in IDOC
Hi Experts!
I'm currently having a difficult problem here.
This is an idoc issue. The scenario is: An idoc is created from WEB and an error appears "Valuation & is not maintained for material &" in SAP. But when we reporcess again usign the same data through WE19 everything seems to be okay. The status is green. Do you have any idea regarding this?
The error must not appear because the material that is being process is a non-stock material which does not need valuation.
I hope somebody can help me on this.
Thanks in advance!Hi,
Please see that error ME124 ir raised because view "plant stock /
storage location stock" is not maintained in material master for plant.
if the material is not available in stock then no delivery and no
transfer is possible. It is not possible for non-stock
materials to make an stock transfer.
If you are using ME21* to create stock transfer order,
Please make sure the view "plant stock / storage location stock"
have maintained for the relevant plant in the material master
record.
Please also make sure the quantity flag have switched on in Ta OMS2
for both the delivery and receiving plant for the material type
that you are using. Otherwise, the error message ME 124 will be
issued.
But if you get the error error ME124 only for a vendor is the
assignment in Vendor Master (MK03) to plant. This assignment is
used in case of STO, in which plant must be assigned to vendor.
In order to not get the error, please remove plant in the
following path:
XK03 > Extras > Add. purchasing Data > Plant assignment.
BR
Nadia Orlandi -
Error: Lock profile for approval procedure not maintained in Customizing
Hi,
We are working on the CHARM approval process. I have noticed that without selecting an approval procedure, I select the status (Awaiting business approval) on which the approval workflow is triggered, the system gives below error:
Select an approval procedure first
Lock profile for approval procedure not maintained in Customizing
Approval procedure and approval steps are locked automatically
This locks the approval procedure and the RFC can no longer be processed further. Why is that happening ? Anyone can select the status by mistake and lose the RFC, is there a way to stop this or at least reset it ? the lock procedure is already maintained in approval procedure customizing.
Best Regards.Hi Karthik,
Thanks for the quick reply, however the settings mentioned on page 38 are already in place i.e. the approval procedure gets determined correctly based on change category (rule policy) and also is locked after putting it to 'Awaiting Approval'
But the problem exists - setting the status 'Awaiting App.' without selecting app.proc, will result in a total lock of the RFC. -
Message no. 8I766 Number Ranges are not maintained For Extended Withholding
Dear All,
I am facing the following problem when i am trying to generate the withholding tax certificate
1.) Message no. 8I766 Number Ranges are not maintained For Extended Withholding Tax
Number Ranges are not maintained for Business Place and Section. Check entries in tables J_1iewt_cert (for Business Place) or J_1iewt_cert_n (for Section Code) and j_1iewt_certno in EWT.
I have checked all the above tables and found that the entries are maintained
2) When i am trying for print priview and then print its generating spool request and the certificate is getting saved -
> here the following problems are faced
A) . TDS Number is not coming
B).Details Of the tax deductor ( Name , Adress , TDS Circle , TAN & PAN is not coming Where to update these details
C) In Amount Paid / Credited Column - Some fixed amount is comming irrespective of the actual amount credited
Please help me in soving the above issues
Thanks & Regards
Arun.RHi
You need to maintain Section Code wise number range . Go to Sm30 Select Table J_1IEWT_CERT_N and maintain it.
Thanks
GG -
Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year 2009
Hi,
After upgrade to BI 7.0 we are getting error: "Fiscal year variant & is not maintained for calendar year 2009" while opening a query through Bex Analyzer.
Basically it is happening like when we open a particular query, the Variable selection screen comes up, then on clicking the exection button (after selection) it shows SYSTEM_FAILURE exception & clicking the details button, shows the message ""Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year 2009"
Please provide some information/resolution to this.
Thanks,
Shantanu.HI,
Please ensure that you have defined your fiscal year variant in OB29
correctly. It is necessary that:
1. the previous year has been maintained,
2. an entry for Dec 31 exists in each fiscal year,
3. the following fiscal year has been maintained.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Nitin -
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012
I am getting this error while scheduling infopackage for 2lis_02_HDR.
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012
PLease let me know how to solve thhe issue.
Thanks,
harika.Hi,
Where are you geting error, before execution or duing execution of DTP in the log.
Check if you have transferred fiscal year variants from source system to BW. Then trigger DTP.
Regards,
Pravin Karkhanis.
Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM
Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM -
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012 when loadin
Dear Experts,
We are working on BI7.0 extracting data from ECC 6.0.
I am trying to load data from 0HR_PY_PP_1 which is a Self DataSource in our BW System (extracts data from 0EMPLOYEE and 0PERSON) to load into ZPA_C50 which is a copy of BCT InfoCube 0PAPA_C02 (Headcount).
The data has come through into the PSA very well.
However, DTP is throwing an error while loading 32242 records of data from PSA into ZPA_C50 InfoCube. The error details as below:
Error while updating to target ZPA_C50 (type INFOCUBE)
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012 FGV 2
Messages for 1 data records saved; request is red acc. to configuration
Processing Terminated
We are actually doing a Re-implementation of BW 3.0b in BI 7.0 Ehp1. We have imported Maintenance of Fiscal Year Variant from the BW 3.0b Production System. So this shouldn't be a problem I guess since I have also checked the setting in SPRO in BI 7.0 Development (New) System and they are looking good.
Also, when I do a Filter on 0CALDAY in DTP from 01.01.1900 to 31.12.2010, the loads are working fine. I want the load to run without any Filters on 0CALDAY.
Has anyone been in similar situation. How did you resolve this issue? Your time is very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
ChanduDear Experts
Thanks for your time.
We have resolved this issue ourselves. We have maintained 'Shortened Fiscal Years' for 'Z1' and it is working fine now. Steps are as below:
In BI Dev System -> SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG -> SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -> SAP NetWeaver -> Business Intelligence -> General BI Settings -> Maintain fiscal year variant -> Select 'Z1' Fiscal Year Variant and then DoubleClick on 'Shortened Fiscal Years' to set the Fisc Year Variant -> Save.
The dataload should work fine now.
Cheers,
Chandu -
Hi Team,
We have a requirement to "Populate Error Message(Supervisor not Maintained) while submitting Travel Request if Supervisor(A002) relationship is not maintained for employee in ESS.
We are using standard WDA application - FITV_REQUEST and standard travel request workfow - WS20000050.
Please suggest how to do this.
Thanks,
RaviHi Rajesh,
Thanks for the reply...
We created enhancement for FM HRTRV_IF_GET_CUSTOMIZING and written code in that.
So by this if Logged in Employee is not assgned with Line Manager , it will throw error while accessing "Create Travel Request application".
Thanks,
Ravi.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hello, Apple and all. Yesterday I get hung a computer after sleep (first time in half a year after replacing the Logic Board). After turning off and on again, notebook can't determine internal HDD, but this disk if use USB-SATA adaptor work perfectly
-
Write-read binary file Error 116
Hi all, I am saving double, numeric array data into a binary file and then trying to read it back but keep on getting Error 116 (cannot read from binary file). I have attached screenshots of the way I am writing my data into the binary file and then
-
JTable Custom Renderer not working after sort
Hi All, I have a JTable which has a default renderer. The point of the renderer is to color the background based on the second column. It all words fine, until I sort by any of the columns. Clicking on a column header sorts, but the original backgrou
-
User roles un-assigned in CUA but acces in child system is ok
hi i am have a really weird issue. a user who has access in roles in child clients, suddenly his roles disappeared from CUA. it did not effect access in child systems. any suggestions how to investigate this. thanks
-
1/20/2015 - Beta - AIR 16.0.0.283
Adobe AIR Beta Channel Update This beta release provides access to the latest AIR SDK for Windows, Mac OS, iOS and Android. You can download the AIR beta here: Download Adobe AIR 16 Beta - Adobe Labs Below are some of the key features and benefits o