Ability to open multiple SQL Worksheets for the same connection

Hi,
Please allow the ability to open multiple SQL Worksheets for the same connection, now only one can be opened.
Thanks

Logged Bug 9000801 - ea1: otnforum: worksheet launcher does not remember the last/default connection
-Raghu

Similar Messages

How to open multiple hotmail accounts at the same time ?

Hi,
Seems maybe normal for some people but I coming from internet explorer and with this explorer I was able to open multiple hotmail accounts at the same time, by default firefox can't do that, is there some setup to modify to open these at the same time ?
Thanks in advance for any help.
(Version updated 3.6.8)
Regards,
Chris

You can look at one of these if you want to sign on with different identities at the same time:
* CookiePie: http://www.nektra.com/oss/firefox/extensions/cookiepie/
* CookieSwap: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/3255
* Multifox: http://br.mozdev.org/multifox/ - Different logins at the same time

Can I have multiple iTunes accounts for the same Ipod?

Can I have multiple iTunes accounts for the same Ipod? What I mean is can I use multiple iTunes accounts through the same iPod for buying stuff?

I believe you're limited to syncing DRM'd items from 5 different accounts.
tt2

Same material can exist on multiple line items for the same order.

Hi
Is there any specific customising setting or web shop setting through which we can restrict user to add same material on multiple line items for the same order ?
Regards

No.
But if this is a must requirement, you can do an elaborate check during order save in ORDER_SAVE BAdI and return error. So, it will be only during order save.
Eawar Ram
http://www.parxlns.com

Multiple shipping addresses for the same supplier (depending on the symbol)

Hello ,can we set up multiple shipping addresses for the same supplier (depending on the symbol)?
.& How..
Thanks

a delivery adedress has nothing to do with a certain supplier, except you are talking about subcontracting (do you?)
a delivery address specifies an address where you want the supplier to send the goods to.
if it is a third party PO, then the delivery address is derived from ship-to partner of the sales order.
in case of a standard order to stock, the delivery address is coming from the storage location address (if maintained). if no storage location address is maintained, then SAP takes the address from your plant.
You can manually add a delivery address in MEAN transaction and then manually assign in POs delivery address tab.
here you can as well take the address from any address already in your system (e.g. any customer or vendor).

UWL - System doesnt support multiple tasks assignment for the same assignee

Hi all,
we have some tasks coming from our back- end system. When a certain task needs to be substituted to a colleague, no problem ... for one task. When we wish to assign him a second task, we get following message :
<i>System does not support multiple tasks assignment for the same assignee</i>
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/0b/1fc20097b74c41b38621ec2a9454bb/frameset.htm">help.sap.com - substitution</a> :
<i> System does not support multiple tasks assignment for the same assignee
For example: User can only assign one task to an assignee at a time in workflow.
Collaboration Task does not support other tasks at all.</i>
Is substitution only limited to one task per person? What would be a workaround? It's possible to create for each combination of tasks a definition in the back- end which is available from the substition drop down list, but this is not what our customer would like to see.
Many thanks,
Kevin

Hi Boris,
we're using the WebflowConnector.
Thanks,
Kevin

E4200 v2 - Uses multiple MAC addresses for the same device

This unit seems pretty good at first but on looking at the Web interface I noticed that it was using multiple mac addresses for the same device and showing devices on the lan on the Wireless side and other odd things.
After a week of running it the home server network started to get erratic, it would seem to all point to dns and dhcp issues in the router.
Seems the V1 had the same issues that they did not fix on this.
The Cisco connect software shows 5 devices the Web based utility shows 3??.
Its pretty bad that they charge nearly $200 and cannot be bothered to finish the unit or address the issues that were in V1.

I am afraid I didn't get the clear picture of the issue mentioned in the post. Could you please elaborate a little bit? If you connect a device/computer wired and then later you connect it wirelessly. It is obvious that you would get to see two different MAC addresses for the same device, one for the LAN adaptor and other one for WLAN adaptor. If that is what you are referring to?
Secondly, may I know, what issues did you face with DNS and DHCP in the router? Is it not able to resolve the DNS or something else or DHCP is not sending IP address to the clients?

Multiple Executions Plans for the same SQL statement

Dear experts,
awrsqrpt.sql is showing multiple executions plans for a single SQL statement. How is it possible that one SQL statement will have multiple Executions Plans within the same AWR report.
Below is the awrsqrpt's output for your reference.
WORKLOAD REPOSITORY SQL Report
Snapshot Period Summary
DB Name         DB Id    Instance     Inst Num Release     RAC Host
TESTDB          2157605839 TESTDB1               1 10.2.0.3.0 YES testhost1
              Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap:     32541 11-Oct-08 21:00:13       248     141.1
End Snap:     32542 11-Oct-08 21:15:06       245     143.4
   Elapsed:               14.88 (mins)
   DB Time:               12.18 (mins)
SQL Summary                            DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
                Elapsed
   SQL Id      Time (ms)
51szt7b736bmg     25,131
Module: SQL*Plus
UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL,0) + NVL(ACCT_DR_BAL,
0)) FROM ACCT WHERE ACCT_TRN_DT = (:B1 ) AND TEST_ACC_NB = ACCT_ACC_NB(+)) WHERE
TEST_BATCH_DT = (:B1 )
SQL ID: 51szt7b736bmg                  DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> 1st Capture and Last Capture Snap IDs
   refer to Snapshot IDs witin the snapshot range
-> UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL,0) + NVL(AC...
    Plan Hash           Total Elapsed                 1st Capture   Last Capture
#   Value                    Time(ms)    Executions       Snap ID        Snap ID
1   2960830398                 25,131             1         32542          32542
2   3834848140                      0             0         32542          32542
Plan 1(PHV: 2960830398)
Plan Statistics                        DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided
   into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
Stat Name                                Statement   Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms)                            25,131       25,130.7     3.4
CPU Time (ms)                                23,270       23,270.2     3.9
Executions                                        1            N/A     N/A
Buffer Gets                               2,626,166    2,626,166.0    14.6
Disk Reads                                      305          305.0     0.3
Parse Calls                                       1            1.0     0.0
Rows                                        371,735      371,735.0     N/A
User I/O Wait Time (ms)                         564            N/A     N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms)                            0            N/A     N/A
Application Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Invalidations                                     0            N/A     N/A
Version Count                                     2            N/A     N/A
Sharable Mem(KB)                                 26            N/A     N/A
Execution Plan
| Id | Operation                    | Name            | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT             |                 |       |       | 1110 (100)|          |
|   1 | UPDATE                      | TEST            |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL          | TEST            |   116K| 2740K| 1110   (2)| 00:00:14 |
|   3 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACCT            |     1 |    26 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ACCT_DT_ACC_IDX |     1 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Plan 2(PHV: 3834848140)
Plan Statistics                        DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided
   into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
Stat Name                                Statement   Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms)                                 0            N/A     0.0
CPU Time (ms)                                     0            N/A     0.0
Executions                                        0            N/A     N/A
Buffer Gets                                       0            N/A     0.0
Disk Reads                                        0            N/A     0.0
Parse Calls                                       0            N/A     0.0
Rows                                              0            N/A     N/A
User I/O Wait Time (ms)                           0            N/A     N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms)                            0            N/A     N/A
Application Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Invalidations                                     0            N/A     N/A
Version Count                                     2            N/A     N/A
Sharable Mem(KB)                                 26            N/A     N/A
Execution Plan
| Id | Operation                    | Name         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT             |              |       |       |     2 (100)|          |
|   1 | UPDATE                      | TEST         |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TEST         |     1 |    28 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | TEST_DT_IND |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACCT         |     1 |    26 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | INDX_ACCT_DT |     1 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Full SQL Text
SQL ID       SQL Text
51szt7b736bm UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL, 0) +
              NVL(ACCT_DR_BAL, 0)) FROM ACCT WHERE ACCT_TRN_DT = (:B1 ) AND PB
             RN_ACC_NB = ACCT_ACC_NB(+)) WHERE TEST_BATCH_DT = (:B1 )Your input is highly appreciated.
Thanks for taking your time in answering my question.
Regards

Oracle Lover3 wrote:
Dear experts,
awrsqrpt.sql is showing multiple executions plans for a single SQL statement. How is it possible that one SQL statement will have multiple Executions Plans within the same AWR report.If you're using bind variables and you've histograms on your columns which can be created by default in 10g due to the "SIZE AUTO" default "method_opt" parameter of DBMS_STATS.GATHER__STATS it is quite normal that you get different execution plans for the same SQL statement. Depending on the values passed when the statement is hard parsed (this feature is called "bind variable peeking" and enabled by default since 9i) an execution plan is determined and re-used for all further executions of the same "shared" SQL statement.
If now your statement ages out of the shared pool or is invalidated due to some DDL or statistics gathering activity it will be re-parsed and again the values passed in that particular moment will determine the execution plan. If you have skewed data distribution and a histogram in place that reflects that skewness you might get different execution plans depending on the actual values used.
Since this "flip-flop" behaviour can sometimes be counter-productive if you're unlucky and the values used to hard parse the statement leading to a plan that is unsuitable for the majority of values used afterwards, 11g introduced the "adaptive" cursor sharing that attempts to detect such a situation and can automatically re-evaluate the execution plan of the statement.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

How do I use multiple local workspaces for the same website in VS2013?

For quite some time I've been using VS2010 with multiple workspaces mapped from the same TFS branch to test different variants of a website in parallel. The internal web server (Cassini) seems quite happy to run multiple versions and simply maps a new port
number for the second and subsequent instances that start up.
We are now looking to move to VS2013, so have to use IISExpress since the 'internal' web server is no longer provided.
How do I configure things so that if I open a single workspace, IISExpress runs against that workspace using the default port number (specified in the solution), but if I open a second instance in a different workspace it correctly uses a new port number
and working folder. Do I need to invoke IISExpress using the command line (presumably from each workspace) and specify the relevant defaults or is there some way to enter this in the local config file for IISExpress?
My initial attempt at editing to config file resulted in the 2nd and subsequent instance using the same physicalfolder as the first instance, presumably because the speficied site name and port number are the same!

Hello,
Thank you for your post.
I am afraid that the issue is out of support range of VS General Question forum which mainly discusses
the usage of Visual Studio IDE such as WPF & SL designer, Visual Studio Guidance Automation Toolkit, Developer Documentation and Help System
and Visual Studio Editor.
Based on your description, I suggest that you can consult your issue on ASP.NET forum:
http://forums.asp.net/
or IIS forums: http://forums.iis.net/ for better solution and support.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Why can't I open a new tab for the same website? Want to disable 'switch to tab'.

I used to be able to open multiple tabs for the same website on Firefox 3.xx. I could download files from one tab and work from another. How can I disable the 'switch to tab' function?

You can disable it by using the Switch to Tab no more add-on - https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/switch-to-tab-no-more

Multiple info records for the same material record in the catalog

Hi Guys,
I have got sort of a puzzle I can not solve at the moment, maybe some one can help me to solve it. The situation in our system landscape is as follows:
Systems:
SRM 5.0 (Classic implementation scenario)
ECC 6.0
SRM-MDM 2.0
PI 2005
Material master is maintained in R/3 and the materials are replicated to SRM. From SRM we replicate all materials to the catalog repository in SRM-MDM.
As the material master in R/3 is vendor independent, the materials replicated to SRM also have no vendor attached. For the first initial material replication from SRM to the catalog SRM-MDM this also means that the products in the main table of the repository, u2018catalog positionsu2019, will not have a vendor or vendor number attached (i.e. no reference to a source of supply).
To assign a source of supply in the repository to a product (record) we will use info records which are replicated from R/3 to SRM-MDM. The mapping for this in the Import Manager can only be based on the product number. As this is the only unique value available which can map a info record to a already existing (but vendor less) ptoduct item in the catalog.
As long as every item in the repository has only one unique info record, meaning one source of supply with a specific price, there is no issue in the above scenario. Based on the product-id, the info record data will be matched with the material item in the catalog.
The issue for me arises when multiple info records exists for the same material. The info records can heave different vendors and different prices. All possible vendors should be available in the catalog for the same material (at least this is the requirement ).
At this point the product-id will no longer be an unique value. Importing the info records will cause problems, as only one material record is available in the repository for the specific product-id (remember that when doing a initial replication of the material master to the catalog, no vendor data is replicated).
Does anyone had this issue before, and knows a solution? Is it for example possible during the import of the info records in the Import manager, to duplicate material records in the destination data, based on the number of info records available in the source data for the same product-id. Or is there an other solution that I am missing?
Your help would be appreciated!
Regards,
Skander

Dear Poster
Your thread has had no response since it's creation over
2 weeks ago, therefore, I recommend that you either:
- Rephrase the question.
- Provide additional Information to prompt a response.
- Close the thread if the answer is already known.
Thank you for your compliance in this regard.
Jason Boggans
SAP SRM SDN Moderator

Support for Multiple Hierarchies defined for the same GL Segment

Hi,
In our eBS setup, we have multiple hierarchies defined for a GL Segment.
OOTB, BI Apps 7.9.6.3 provides support for 10 Segments, and it's corresponding Hierarchies (1 Hierarchy for each Segment).
My question here is whether OOTB BI Apps 7.9.6.3 supports Multiple Hierarchies for the same Segment?+
Thanks,
Ab

no it is not supported OOTB as of today
you need to customize ETL mappings and OBIEE metadata to include hierarchy identifiers from the EBS segment definitions.
Then you have to consider that filtering a hierarchy identifier becomes mandatory during query execution to avoid aggregation of duplicated values.

Trying Multiple File Uploads for the same record

Okay I"m trying to upload 3 images on a form that will go
into my gallery. Image types are jpg,gif,eps. What I've got to work
so far is for all three images to upload to my server which is
great, However when I look into my table, all three images are the
eps image. What's wrong with this code? Again I don't won't
separate records, just the ability to load 3 different images in
the same record in my table. See code below

The FILE.ServerFile variable is only going to contain the
information from the most recent <cffile> call.

Oracle Coherence*Web and BlazeDS: Multiple FlexSessions created for the same HttpSession

Hi all,
I have searched this forum and found a lot of good information from Alex Glosband and others about the infamous "Detected duplicate HTTP - based FlexSessions, generally due to the remote host disabling session cookies. Session coolkies must be enable to manage the client connection correctly." message.
It seems, however, none of the cases are identical to ours. This is ours:
- Resin 3.1.9
- Oracle Coherence 3.7.1 with Coherence*Web (session replication)
With this setup we get the "Detected duplicate HTTP..." message on the first attempt to use BlazeDS and on every subsequent call. The same client and server code works fine in a local sessions setup. With Coherence 3.3 (currently our production environment) it seems to occur less frequently, but still as frequent as it is a major issue for us. It fails even with a single node using in-process distributed caching in our test setup (as well as with multi node out of process caching in our staging environment, for Coherence knowledgeable the resin app server runs with tangosol.coherence.session.localstorage=true in the first case and false in the second).
Both the listener and message broker are mapped as "Coherence aware" in web.xml[1] so that they should use clustered sessions.
We have been digging a bit and we found out that if we commented out lines 427 and 434 of flex.messaging.endpoints.BaseHTTPEndpoint from version 4.0.0.14931 it seems to mask the bug. We added some logging in the setupFlexClient method and it seems that we get more or less a new FlexSession for each and every call - but they have the same cookie and thus underlying HttpSession. I.e. the list returned from flexClient.getFlexSessions() keeps growing. Thus we are not so keen on going to production with that memory leak and the above mentioned ugly hack of commenting out the detection of duplicates.
We use request scope for the remote object, but could in theory use any scope as we do not really have any state on the object itself, it is all HttpSession state and return values that are key (logon is performed prior to doing the first blaze call, in pure forms and ajax, and it is not a timing issue in that regard we are seeing).
Hope someone can shed some light on what can be happening. Is there any "reference testing"[2] or something when the FlexSessions are created that makes them being created as new? Where are they created? We do not know the inner workings of the BlazeDS source, we just watched the call trace of the unwanted invalidation and found that to be line 427 of flex.messaging.endpoints.BaseHTTPEndpoint.
Can we disable FlexSessions? Since the flex and plain html parts of the app share the sessions, we always use FlexContext.getHttpRequest().getSession() anyway, never storing any state directly in the FlexSession or on the remote object. Or maybe there is a config option to help us with this detection (or creation) of multiple FlexSessions?
Cheers and TIA,
-S-
[1] - For instance, this i the message broker servlet def:
<servlet>
<servlet-name>MessageBrokerServlet</servlet-name>
<display-name>MessageBrokerServlet</display-name>
<servlet-class>com.tangosol.coherence.servlet.api22.ServletWrapper</servlet-class>
<init-param>
<param-name>coherence-servlet-class</param-name>
<param-value>flex.messaging.MessageBrokerServlet</param-value>
</init-param>
<init-param>
<param-name>services.configuration.file</param-name>
<param-value>/WEB-INF/flex/services-config.xml</param-value>
</init-param>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
[2] - As you undertstand this is speculation based on pure air, but it could be that in Coherence there was a serialization/deserialization happening somehow that would break such a test?

Just a quick update, it seems things are running in a stable fashion (and without visible memory leaks, just keeping the latest FlexSession) with these changes in BaseHTTPEndpoint:
     * Overrides to guard against duplicate HTTP-based sessions for the same FlexClient which will occur if the remote host has disabled session
     * cookies.
     * @see AbstractEndpoint#setupFlexClient(String)
    @Override
    public FlexClient setupFlexClient(String id) {
        log.debug("setupFlexClient start id " + id);
        FlexClient flexClient = super.setupFlexClient(id);
        // Scan for duplicate HTTP-sessions and if found, invalidate them and throw a MessageException.
        // A request attribute is used to deal with batched AMF messages that arrive in a single request by trigger multiple passes through this
        // method.
        boolean duplicateSessionDetected = (FlexContext.getHttpRequest().getAttribute(REQUEST_ATTR_DUPLICATE_SESSION_FLAG) != null);
        if (!duplicateSessionDetected) {
            List<FlexSession> sessions = flexClient.getFlexSessions();
            log.debug("Client has " + sessions.size() + " sessions.");
            int n = sessions.size();
            if (n > 1) {
                int count = 0;
                for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
                    if (sessions.get(i) instanceof HttpFlexSession)
                        count++;
                    if (count > 1) {
                        FlexContext.getHttpRequest().setAttribute(REQUEST_ATTR_DUPLICATE_SESSION_FLAG, Boolean.TRUE);
                        duplicateSessionDetected = true;
                        break;
        // If more than one was found, remote host isn't using session cookies. Kill all duplicate sessions and return an error.
        // Simplest to just re-scan the list given that it will be very short, but use an iterator for concurrent modification.
        int i = 0;
        if (duplicateSessionDetected) {
            List<FlexSession> sessions = flexClient.getFlexSessions();
            log.debug("Detected sessions from client: " + sessions);
            for (FlexSession session : sessions) {
                if (session instanceof HttpFlexSession && i < sessions.size()) {
//                    log.debug("----> sessionId: " + session.getId());
//                    Enumeration e1 = session.getAttributeNames();
//                    while (e1.hasMoreElements()) {
//                        Object key = e1.nextElement();
//                        log.debug("--------->" + key + "--------->" + session.getAttribute((String) key));
//                    session.invalidate();
                    flexClient.sessionDestroyed(session);
                i++;
            // Return an error to the client.
//            DuplicateSessionException e = new DuplicateSessionException();
//            e.setMessage(ERR_MSG_DUPLICATE_SESSIONS_DETECTED);
//            throw e;
        return flexClient;
It is not exactly beautiful (to say the least), but if it does the trick I might just be pragmatic enough to go with it... NB: I am of course not proposing this as a patch to this file or anything, it is just an ugly hack for our specific case, but maybe the information can help the BlazeDS team find the root cause making it incompatible with Coherence*Web.
Will give it a test run on our staging servers.

SCD - source sets where multiple changes exist for the same natural key

I am using the Oracle SCD type2 method (end date old record and insert the new record) which was working fine until my source set contained multiple changes for the same natural key. Does anyone know of a way to handle this?
Thanks

Hello,
I think, the way of handling multiply changes of NK is totally depend on business requirements for your project.
There could be number of approaches for this. For example:
- all changes but the last are considered active during one day, going subsequently right after previously existed SCD record;
- all changes but the last are considered active depending on its occurrence within fact data (as far as you consider NK change based on some attribute set - probably some of attributes show themselves within fact data)
- etc.
So, make an agreement upon this with your customer and ETL design decision will follow immediately.
Sergey

Ability to open multiple SQL Worksheets for the same connection

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for