About conversion rule in BD79

Dear experts,
I would like to fall back on your help on the conversion rule in BD79.
In our system, there is a HTTP connection used for sending IDoc to the website. The Unit of measurement need be converted when sending out to the receiver side. The problem is when I converted using BD79 with rule type 'Conver Sender fields', set conditon to convert unit '%' to 'wt%', but the value in recerive field always display in Upper letters('WT%').
Can anyone help me on this problem? if it can not be realized in this way, please show me another possible solution.
Besides, is it possbile to convert '%' to 'wt%' with some condition to make it just apply to some spectial characteristics?
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Benny

Hi sudeep
Could you let me know  the exact steps you did to  create the conversion rule for idocs.
Thanks in Advance

Similar Messages

  • About conversion rule using BD79

    Dear experts,
    I would like to fall back on your help on the conversion rule in BD79.
    In our system, there is a HTTP connection used for sending IDoc to the website. The Unit of measurement need be converted when sending out to the receiver side. The problem is when I converted using BD79 with rule type 'Conver Sender fields', set conditon to convert unit '%' to 'wt%', but the value in recerive field always display in Upper letters('WT%').
    Can anyone help me on this problem? if it can not be realized in this way, please show me another possible solution.
    Besides, is it possbile to convert '%' to 'wt%' with some condition to make it just apply to some spectial characteristics?
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Benny

    Are the two GSS devices clustered ? Set one up as the Master GSSM and the other as the Standby GSSM adding the source-lists you've specified. Either of the GSS devices can reply to DNS queries and these will provide an answer depending on where the request was sourced from. It also depends on your DNS Heirarchy and where the request are coming from. Is there a DNS server sitting above your GSS devices ? How are the clients configured ? Do they point directly to you GSS devices or some other DNS device ?

  • CONVERSION  RULE

    hi,
    plz suggest me anything(their types,significance etc.) about CONVERSION RULES in ABAP

    Conversion Rules for Internal Tables
    Internal tables can only be converted into other internal tables. You cannot convert them into structures or elementary fields.
    Internal tables are convertible if their line types are convertible. The convertibility of internal tables does not depend on the number of lines.
    Conversion rules for internal tables:
    Internal tables which have internal tables as their line type are convertible if the internal tables which define the line types are convertible.
    Internal tables which have line types that are structures with internal tables as components are convertible according to the conversion rules for structures if the structures are compatible.
    Also check these links..
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/fc/eb34d0358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/59/ae3cfe488f11d189490000e829fbbd/frameset.htm

  • Conversion rules

    hi,
    plz suggest me anything(their types,significance etc.) about CONVERSION RULES in ABAP.

    Hi,
       Thank you very much. if you have any example document for how to write conversion rules for and master idoc such as material or customer, please send to [email protected]
    Cheers,
    Kannan.

  • Send custom error message using IDoc conversion rule?

    Hello,
    I am using an Idoc conversion rule in BD79 to load cost centers.  In my conversion rule I use a conversion exit function module to concatenate 2 specific characters and sending cost center value together and then this output value placed in the receiving cost center field.  This works fine, but now I want to send a custom error message to the idoc and fail the idoc if the sending cost center value is greater than 8 digits. 
    Does anyone know how to send an error message or update an idoc with an error message using a conversion rule (bd79)?
    Thank you,
    Rhonda

    Hi Rhonda,
    Any luck on the below.. i have a similar issue...
    Sorry to hijack your thread...

  • Can we write code using BD79(ALE IDoc Conversion Rule)

    Hi -
    I had created a conversion rule that specifies for the field account group (KTOKD) on KNA1:   I need to include the following logic :
    if the customer number (KNA1-KUNNR) is in the range 0010000000-0019999999 or 0140000000 to 0149999999, then change the account group value to u201CSKIPu201D.
    So I had created a conversion rule using BD62.
    In BD79, I had set the constant to SKIP.
    But where to include the following logic :
    if the customer number (KNA1-KUNNR) is in the range 0010000000-0019999999 or 0140000000 to 0149999999, then change the account group value to u201CSKIPu201D.
    Thanks,
    Gyanaraj

    Hi Shital ,
    Thank U very much for replying to my question.
    But when I m trying to create the same , by clicking Use general rule & specifying special conversion routine ZBLNK , it is throwing the following error "Conversion exit ZBLNK does not exist".
    Please can u help me out.
    Thanks,
    Gyanaraj

  • Query about ALE conversion rule

    Hi,
       I am trying to copy an ALE conversion rule from one system to another.
       In the rule, for one of the variables, the option 'Set Variable' is selected and a variable '&PRTMVxxxx' (Name changed)
       is set under 'Rule Type'.
       I was not aware of how this variable gets filled or what additional setting is required.
       Could someone help me out with this option under the conversion rules?
    Regards,
    Sudeep

    Hi Gaurav,
    I have exactly the same problem that you had back in late 2006, with the Conversion Rules somehow not passing the data to the IDOC segment.
    The IDOC segment is cleared of all values with the Conversion Rule active.
    I have managed to determine that the exit is working properly, at least to the point where it is finished in EXIT_SAPFKCIM_001, and SENDER_SET_NEW is filled correctly.
    Did you manage to figure out what was wrong?
    Does anyone else know how to get this working?
    Thanks,
    Bruno

  • BD79 Idoc Conversion Rule

    Hi,
    I have a requirement where I have a Inbound Idoc which has two segments say E1EDP03 and E1EDP20. Both are date fields.
    now I want to map date from E1EDP03 if Qualif is Z01 to E1EDP20 using conversion rule.
    E1EDP03 (Qualif. Z01) - DATUM  -
    >>> E1EDP20-EDATU
    Is it possible to do this using conversion rule?
    Thanks,

    Hi Shital ,
    Thank U very much for replying to my question.
    But when I m trying to create the same , by clicking Use general rule & specifying special conversion routine ZBLNK , it is throwing the following error "Conversion exit ZBLNK does not exist".
    Please can u help me out.
    Thanks,
    Gyanaraj

  • Conversion rule executed in sender and receiver system?

    Hello experts,
    I want to send an Idoc from one SAP system to another.
    Both systems are in the same transport line.
    In the sender system I want to execute a field conversion. There
    Therefore I maintained BD62 (Define Conversion Rule), BD55 (activate Conversion Rule for Sender/Receiver combination) and BD79 (Specifie Conversion).
    The mapping works perfectly.
    The creation of the IDoc and the field conversion work perfectly.
    But I get an error in the receiver system.
    It seems that this system also tries to execute the fieldmapping, because it has the same BD55 (sender/receiver) settings.
    The conversion rule itself does not exist in the receiver system, as these settings are not contained in a transport request.
    What is the correct way? Can I customize BD55 not to generate a transport request and maintain this setting only in the relevant system?
    Or do I need to maintain BD79 and BD62 also manually in the receiver system?
    any hints
    Barbara

    Hi Barbara,
    you have to maintain BD79 and BD62  manually in all receiver Systems.
    Kind regards
    Werner

  • ALE : conversion rule for field value to become null

    Dear experts,
    I need to pass a material from one system to another with ALE. The problem is that the field marc-prctr (profit center) of this material is populated in the first system, but it does not exist in the second, so I assume transaction bd79 should be used to convert somehow the value of prctr to initial.
    How can I do that??? I have already tried defining a conversion rule and assigning it to message type MATMAS, segment E1MARCM, but it did not work.
    Please help.

    Did you check this?<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/d3/06f6679aaf0e44b67ca6d6b58d91df/content.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/d3/06f6679aaf0e44b67ca6d6b58d91df/content.htm</a>

  • ALE Conversion rules not processed

    Hi all,
    I defined some conversion rules for an inbound IDoc with trascation BD79 in my backend system.
    If I send an IDoc from XI to the backend system the rules are ignored:
    Status 64
    No filters , <b>No conversion</b> , No version change .
    If I try the <u>SAME</u> Idoc with WE19 using the standard inbound, it works:
    Status 64
    No filters , <b>Fields converted</b> , No version change.
    Any idea? I guess it's a bug.
    Thank you.
    Stefano

    <b>FYI</b>
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/80/411a73382b44d0a1667816716f5b37/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/f9/c3075cac7d11d39460005004580996/content.htm
    Hope this’ll give you idea!!
    <b>Pl... award the points.</b>
    Good luck
    Thanks
    Saquib Khan
    "Some are wise and some are otherwise"

  • ALE IDoc Conversion Rule or BADI

    Hi,
    I'm new to ALE IDoc. I have a requirement to hide some sensitive data field for the HR information when outbound the Idoc.
    Example, I need to outbound the IT8 Basic Pay with payscale area etc but not with the basic pay amount. I can convert the basic pay amount to zero when the idoc is being created.
    I've searched through some information and found out that there are several ways to achieve it. However, I'm not sure which one is a better way.
    Is it using the Conversion Rule (BD62) or using Badi or Idoc Reduction method is better?
    Kindly give me some hints as I'm very confuse of which one is the better solution.
    Many thanks in advance.

    No user exit is needed for conversion rule.
    However, you should remember that conversion rules are applied segment fields for a particular message type. So wherever the IDoc message type is used the rule will be applied. If you want to associate the rule for any other condition in addition to message type better to go with a BADI
    These are steps to create and apply a conversion rule to a message type:
    1. Transaction BD62 - Create conversion rule and assign it to a IDoc segment
    2. Transaction BD79 - Define the conversion rule by selecting your field and clicking display button. Once inside you can use various options like set constant to map 0 to the basic pay
    3. Finally assign the conversion rule to your message type using BD55
    As for BADIs, IDOC_DATA_MAPPER is also suited for your requirement, the method PROCESS, allows you to manipulate your IDoc fields whichever way you want. You get the control record, data records, using which you can restrict your manipulation to specific message type or other conditions
    To above post, BADI IDOC_CREATION_CHECK should not be used for mappings/conversions as its specific purpose is to stop creation of an IDoc under required conditions

  • Different values within "conversion rule" possible?

    Hi,
    in context of the HR-CRM-integration we are using a conversion rule for converting the private address (IT 0006) to a constant value by using trx bd62 -> bd79 -> bd55. This conversion rule works quite fine, but the disadvantage is that we can only define one address for all.
    Is there a way using conversion rules for converting to several addresses? E.g. we have some employees in the USA, and others in Germany. Depending on the country maintained in the IT0006 we would like to convert the addresse for the colleagues in the USA to address1, for german employees to address2. At last we need something like a condition-express: "if... then". Is there anything possible achiving it, please?
    Thank you
    Maik

    Found it by my own. In the transaction bd79 is it possible to use different rule types. With using "Convert/copy" we could define different search criteria for "sender fields". By setting some conditions we could filter, and set then the "Value receiver field" with proper fields.

  • ALE conversion rules - Using a Mapping table

    Hi, I need to use ALE conversion rules to modify Objects IDs using a custom mapping table. I´m looking BD79 transaction but I didn't find a place to use a mapping table..does anyone know how to do it?
    Thanks!

    <b>FYI</b>
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/80/411a73382b44d0a1667816716f5b37/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/f9/c3075cac7d11d39460005004580996/content.htm
    Hope this’ll give you idea!!
    <b>Pl... award the points.</b>
    Good luck
    Thanks
    Saquib Khan
    "Some are wise and some are otherwise"

  • Idoc Conversion rule, Change pointers and Filters

    Hi Experts,
        Please any one can help me out, i need material or clear picture about Idoc Conversion rule, Change pointers and Filters where we can use these concepts what is the befit for these concepts.
    Thanks in advance,
    Ramesh.

    Hi,
    Check this link. It has got some of the tutorials you are looking for.
    http://www.****************/Tutorials/ALE/ALEMainPage.htm
    Cheers
    VJ

Maybe you are looking for

  • System error when I refresh a query/WB

    Hi All,         When I refresh a query/workbook getting following error message and can not proceed further.. <b>Abort System Error in program SAPLRRS2 and form INITFL_ASSIGN-01</b> We are using BW 3.5 and BEX reports. I'd appreciate if you could hel

  • New ipad will no longer connect to the internet.

    This is not a network problem - all my other devices work fine and are connecting (including iphone, MacBook, girlfriends "new" ipad). Mine worked fine for months then suddenly, i get the wifi signal but in settings, you just see the spinning gear -

  • Rfc  to soap scenarios

    hi expects ,      can any body send me the rfc to soap scenarios examples.please help me.

  • Lion audio dropouts with external speakers?

    Since I installed OS 10.7.3 (upgraded from 10.6.8), I get audio dropouts whenever I use external speakers.  I use my Mini (purchased a year ago in Feb 2011) connected to my TV for Skype, Netflix, and listening to iTunes, so this effectively eliminate

  • Multiple Developers on one Project

    Hi, I would like to know if there is a way that multiple developers on one project can work separately and later merge work into the main project?  I am thinking about the concept concurrent development.