About conversion rule using BD79

Dear experts,
I would like to fall back on your help on the conversion rule in BD79.
In our system, there is a HTTP connection used for sending IDoc to the website. The Unit of measurement need be converted when sending out to the receiver side. The problem is when I converted using BD79 with rule type 'Conver Sender fields', set conditon to convert unit '%' to 'wt%', but the value in recerive field always display in Upper letters('WT%').
Can anyone help me on this problem? if it can not be realized in this way, please show me another possible solution.
Besides, is it possbile to convert '%' to 'wt%' with some condition to make it just apply to some spectial characteristics?
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Benny

Are the two GSS devices clustered ? Set one up as the Master GSSM and the other as the Standby GSSM adding the source-lists you've specified. Either of the GSS devices can reply to DNS queries and these will provide an answer depending on where the request was sourced from. It also depends on your DNS Heirarchy and where the request are coming from. Is there a DNS server sitting above your GSS devices ? How are the clients configured ? Do they point directly to you GSS devices or some other DNS device ?

Similar Messages

About conversion rule in BD79

Dear experts,
I would like to fall back on your help on the conversion rule in BD79.
In our system, there is a HTTP connection used for sending IDoc to the website. The Unit of measurement need be converted when sending out to the receiver side. The problem is when I converted using BD79 with rule type 'Conver Sender fields', set conditon to convert unit '%' to 'wt%', but the value in recerive field always display in Upper letters('WT%').
Can anyone help me on this problem? if it can not be realized in this way, please show me another possible solution.
Besides, is it possbile to convert '%' to 'wt%' with some condition to make it just apply to some spectial characteristics?
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Benny

Hi sudeep
Could you let me know the exact steps you did to create the conversion rule for idocs.
Thanks in Advance

ALE conversion rules - Using a Mapping table

Hi, I need to use ALE conversion rules to modify Objects IDs using a custom mapping table. I´m looking BD79 transaction but I didn't find a place to use a mapping table..does anyone know how to do it?
Thanks!

FYI
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/80/411a73382b44d0a1667816716f5b37/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/f9/c3075cac7d11d39460005004580996/content.htm
Hope thisll give you idea!!
Pl... award the points.
Good luck
Thanks
Saquib Khan
"Some are wise and some are otherwise"

Can we write code using BD79(ALE IDoc Conversion Rule)

Hi -
I had created a conversion rule that specifies for the field account group (KTOKD) on KNA1: I need to include the following logic :
if the customer number (KNA1-KUNNR) is in the range 0010000000-0019999999 or 0140000000 to 0149999999, then change the account group value to u201CSKIPu201D.
So I had created a conversion rule using BD62.
In BD79, I had set the constant to SKIP.
But where to include the following logic :
if the customer number (KNA1-KUNNR) is in the range 0010000000-0019999999 or 0140000000 to 0149999999, then change the account group value to u201CSKIPu201D.
Thanks,
Gyanaraj

Hi Shital ,
Thank U very much for replying to my question.
But when I m trying to create the same , by clicking Use general rule & specifying special conversion routine ZBLNK , it is throwing the following error "Conversion exit ZBLNK does not exist".
Please can u help me out.
Thanks,
Gyanaraj

Send custom error message using IDoc conversion rule?

Hello,
I am using an Idoc conversion rule in BD79 to load cost centers. In my conversion rule I use a conversion exit function module to concatenate 2 specific characters and sending cost center value together and then this output value placed in the receiving cost center field. This works fine, but now I want to send a custom error message to the idoc and fail the idoc if the sending cost center value is greater than 8 digits.
Does anyone know how to send an error message or update an idoc with an error message using a conversion rule (bd79)?
Thank you,
Rhonda

Hi Rhonda,
Any luck on the below.. i have a similar issue...
Sorry to hijack your thread...

CONVERSION RULE

hi,
plz suggest me anything(their types,significance etc.) about CONVERSION RULES in ABAP

Conversion Rules for Internal Tables
Internal tables can only be converted into other internal tables. You cannot convert them into structures or elementary fields.
Internal tables are convertible if their line types are convertible. The convertibility of internal tables does not depend on the number of lines.
Conversion rules for internal tables:
Internal tables which have internal tables as their line type are convertible if the internal tables which define the line types are convertible.
Internal tables which have line types that are structures with internal tables as components are convertible according to the conversion rules for structures if the structures are compatible.
Also check these links..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/fc/eb34d0358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/59/ae3cfe488f11d189490000e829fbbd/frameset.htm

Conversion rules

hi,
plz suggest me anything(their types,significance etc.) about CONVERSION RULES in ABAP.

Hi,
Thank you very much. if you have any example document for how to write conversion rules for and master idoc such as material or customer, please send to [email protected]
Cheers,
Kannan.

Using conversion rule to convert quantity fields

Hi!
I am trying to find a way to use a conversion rule to convert a quantity specified in one unit of measure to the corresponding quantity specified in a different unit of measure. I was trying to use 'Copy sender field' along with a custom 'Special conversion rule'. However, the code to convert quantities requires both the quantity and material number to do the UoM conversion. 'Copy sender field' only allows the transfer of one sender field. Is there a way to transfer two sender field into a 'Special conversion rule'. Any help much appreciated and rewarded. Thanks, Duncan

Hi Duncan,
Try FM UNIT_CONVERSION_SIMPLE.
Regards,
Atish

BD79 Idoc Conversion Rule

Hi,
I have a requirement where I have a Inbound Idoc which has two segments say E1EDP03 and E1EDP20. Both are date fields.
now I want to map date from E1EDP03 if Qualif is Z01 to E1EDP20 using conversion rule.
E1EDP03 (Qualif. Z01) - DATUM -
>>> E1EDP20-EDATU
Is it possible to do this using conversion rule?
Thanks,

Hi Shital ,
Thank U very much for replying to my question.
But when I m trying to create the same , by clicking Use general rule & specifying special conversion routine ZBLNK , it is throwing the following error "Conversion exit ZBLNK does not exist".
Please can u help me out.
Thanks,
Gyanaraj

Query about ALE conversion rule

Hi,
   I am trying to copy an ALE conversion rule from one system to another.
   In the rule, for one of the variables, the option 'Set Variable' is selected and a variable '&PRTMVxxxx' (Name changed)
   is set under 'Rule Type'.
   I was not aware of how this variable gets filled or what additional setting is required.
   Could someone help me out with this option under the conversion rules?
Regards,
Sudeep

Hi Gaurav,
I have exactly the same problem that you had back in late 2006, with the Conversion Rules somehow not passing the data to the IDOC segment.
The IDOC segment is cleared of all values with the Conversion Rule active.
I have managed to determine that the exit is working properly, at least to the point where it is finished in EXIT_SAPFKCIM_001, and SENDER_SET_NEW is filled correctly.
Did you manage to figure out what was wrong?
Does anyone else know how to get this working?
Thanks,
Bruno

ALE : conversion rule for field value to become null

Dear experts,
I need to pass a material from one system to another with ALE. The problem is that the field marc-prctr (profit center) of this material is populated in the first system, but it does not exist in the second, so I assume transaction bd79 should be used to convert somehow the value of prctr to initial.
How can I do that??? I have already tried defining a conversion rule and assigning it to message type MATMAS, segment E1MARCM, but it did not work.
Please help.

Did you check this?<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/d3/06f6679aaf0e44b67ca6d6b58d91df/content.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/d3/06f6679aaf0e44b67ca6d6b58d91df/content.htm</a>

ALE Conversion rules not processed

Hi all,
I defined some conversion rules for an inbound IDoc with trascation BD79 in my backend system.
If I send an IDoc from XI to the backend system the rules are ignored:
Status 64
No filters , No conversion , No version change .
If I try the SAME Idoc with WE19 using the standard inbound, it works:
Status 64
No filters , Fields converted , No version change.
Any idea? I guess it's a bug.
Thank you.
Stefano

FYI
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/80/411a73382b44d0a1667816716f5b37/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/f9/c3075cac7d11d39460005004580996/content.htm
Hope thisll give you idea!!
Pl... award the points.
Good luck
Thanks
Saquib Khan
"Some are wise and some are otherwise"

ALE IDoc Conversion Rule or BADI

Hi,
I'm new to ALE IDoc. I have a requirement to hide some sensitive data field for the HR information when outbound the Idoc.
Example, I need to outbound the IT8 Basic Pay with payscale area etc but not with the basic pay amount. I can convert the basic pay amount to zero when the idoc is being created.
I've searched through some information and found out that there are several ways to achieve it. However, I'm not sure which one is a better way.
Is it using the Conversion Rule (BD62) or using Badi or Idoc Reduction method is better?
Kindly give me some hints as I'm very confuse of which one is the better solution.
Many thanks in advance.

No user exit is needed for conversion rule.
However, you should remember that conversion rules are applied segment fields for a particular message type. So wherever the IDoc message type is used the rule will be applied. If you want to associate the rule for any other condition in addition to message type better to go with a BADI
These are steps to create and apply a conversion rule to a message type:
1. Transaction BD62 - Create conversion rule and assign it to a IDoc segment
2. Transaction BD79 - Define the conversion rule by selecting your field and clicking display button. Once inside you can use various options like set constant to map 0 to the basic pay
3. Finally assign the conversion rule to your message type using BD55
As for BADIs, IDOC_DATA_MAPPER is also suited for your requirement, the method PROCESS, allows you to manipulate your IDoc fields whichever way you want. You get the control record, data records, using which you can restrict your manipulation to specific message type or other conditions
To above post, BADI IDOC_CREATION_CHECK should not be used for mappings/conversions as its specific purpose is to stop creation of an IDoc under required conditions

ALE, use bd79 (converting data from sender to receiver to blank out fields)

Hi, I am trying to blank four fields out in our FI IDOC for a certain business reason. These fields must be blank (it is the FIDCC1 message type). I am trying to use transaction bd79 (converting data from sender to receiver) maintain rules. Is there a way to blank out these fields using a conversion rule? I can change data fine but I cannot find a way to blank or null a field out. Thanks in advance.

You should have a look at the inbound function module (linked to your inbound process code). sometimes there are checks that if fields are initial that nothing will be changed.

Different values within "conversion rule" possible?

Hi,
in context of the HR-CRM-integration we are using a conversion rule for converting the private address (IT 0006) to a constant value by using trx bd62 -> bd79 -> bd55. This conversion rule works quite fine, but the disadvantage is that we can only define one address for all.
Is there a way using conversion rules for converting to several addresses? E.g. we have some employees in the USA, and others in Germany. Depending on the country maintained in the IT0006 we would like to convert the addresse for the colleagues in the USA to address1, for german employees to address2. At last we need something like a condition-express: "if... then". Is there anything possible achiving it, please?
Thank you
Maik

Found it by my own. In the transaction bd79 is it possible to use different rule types. With using "Convert/copy" we could define different search criteria for "sender fields". By setting some conditions we could filter, and set then the "Value receiver field" with proper fields.

About conversion rule using BD79

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for