About Positions in Org Assignment

Dear Friends,
        If I assign the same position to a group of employees whose description of work falls in the same category, will it create any problems, further.
      Any type of consequences..
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Satya.

I am eloborating my question.
As we create positions (different) and assign jobs to them and assign those positions to Employees.
If I create one position and assign the job to that and assign the same position to diiferent employee numbers, as told by our friend that will be "Function" and we can group the related positions into that.
So, If I assign the same position to different employees, it will accept that is not a problem, But I want to know where it will create problems.
C we can say that best practise or we can assign the same position to different employees,  but that is not advisable.so create different positions and assign it to different employees.
My question is can you please list it out where can I find problems if I go with same positions.
Regards,
Satya.

Similar Messages

  • Assigning discount threshold to a position in org. model

    Hello,
          I need to assign discount thresholds (as a percentage value) to a position in org. model to facilitate discount approval process for quotation. Can this be done by using the attributes section of the position? Please provide your inputs.
    Thanks,
    Aditya Mishra

    Hi Aditya,
    not exactly what you are looking for, but probably you can make use of http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm700_ehp01/helpdata/EN/45/7d36e37962694ee10000000a155369/content.htm or http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm700_ehp01/helpdata/EN/45/bff319692f52f5e10000000a1553f7/content.htm.
    Best Regards,
    Michael

  • Cost center assignment to Position not updated in IT0001 Org Assignment

    Hello,
    I have assigned Cost centers to all Positions (A011) in IT1001 through PP01 from 01/01/2011.
    Now when I see IT0001 in PA30, most of the employees have the updated IT0001 with cost center from 01/01/2011. But few employees have multiple IT0001 records past 01/01/2011.
    e.g. there are 2 records for  IT0001 for particular employee.
    1. from 02/01/2011 - 12/31/9999
    2. from 01/01/2011 - 01/31/2011
    For these employees, cost center is not updated in IT0001 Org Assignment. I tried running RHINT00 and RHINT30 reports but didn't help.
    Please guide, which report tp run to solve this issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Madhu

    Mr.Fun,
    for these employee rerun the action with the same date.
    and chek.
    some of the table entries are not projected perfectly.
    If you rerun the action it will fills that if not the check the cost center assignment to the position done perfectly r not.
    it is advised to assign cost center to the Org.Unit. instead of no. of positions.
    system automatically considers for all the positions in that org.unit.

  • Assignment of territories via HR position in Org Management

    Hi
    How are Territories  assigned to the employee via HR position in Org management? In Org management we have Org units and sales orgs and how can be territories?
    Please help- will reward with full points
    Thanks
    Tarang

    Hello Tarang,
    you can create the position via transaction PPOMA_CRM. Then you assign the position to an org unit.
    When maintaining the position you see tab 'Areas'. Here you can assign the territory for a certain validity.
    Finally you can assign employee(s) to the position. Technically the employee is a Business Partner in role 'employee'.
    So a typical representation in OrgManagement could look like this:
    OrgUnit
    -> Position1 -> Territory1
         -> Employee1
         -> Employee2
    -> Position2  -> Territory2
         -> Employee3
    Kind regards
    Ralf

  • Missing position and Org Unit relationship in PO13

    Hello SAP Pundits,
    I created a Position 1234 with transaction PPOM with Org Unit A and Job code X with start date 01/01/2009
    Now I hire an employee XYZ with this position X from start date 01/01/2009.
    When I go and see position X in PO13 it shows following relationships
    1)     Position 1234 - Org Unit A from 01/01/2009 to 31/12/9999
    2)     Position 1234 u2013 Job Code X from 01/01/2009 to 31/12/9999
    3)     Position 1234 u2013 Person XYZ from 01/01/2009 to 31/12/9999
    Perfect till now.
    Now if I change the Org Unit of the Position 1234 from A to B from date 01/04/2009 using PO13.
    A new record is created in IT0001 with start date 01/04/2009 and previous record is delimited.
    But now if I check the relationships in PO13 for position 1234 I donu2019t see the new record for Position 1234 and Org Unit B.
    However the previous relationship between position 1234 and Org Unit A is delimited till 31/03/2009.
    Why am I not able to see the assignment of Positon 1234 with new Org Unit B? Any reason why I am getting such an error?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ajay Hosur

    When you have changed the Position 1234 to org Unit  B from 01.04.2009 then the previous relationship will not show in po13, it goes into History which you can see in Complete Position Description..
    goto pp01 and select that position and create relationship with Org Unit B... am not sure why in Infotype 0001, previous record get delimited and new record got created..

  • MSS - Creating new Position and Org unit in MSS

    Dear Expert,
    Question 1: I want to know that is it possible to create a new Position or Org Unit in MSS. I am aware that manager can create a requisitioin for a position. But I am not aware that how HR manager will create the Org Unit or Position thourgh MSS.
    - will the HR manager have a new HR administrator Role to do this activity, if yes, which service / iview is used.
    Question 2: We are using Management of Global employees (MGE). Now if any employee expariate to a foreign country how does ESS/MSS will pick the new country assignment. Is there any ess/mss switch for this? or any other configuration
    Question 3: I would like to know what are the main differences of EHP4 and EHP5.
    thanks
    honey

    Hello honey - answer to the 1st question.
    MSS- click Organisation - Search Organisational Process - enter the Process HR_PD_CREATE_POSITION and click start , this could be one solution how the managers may be able to create new position through MSS.
    Regards,
    Regi

  • RHINTE00 - Position and org unit deleted in infotype 0001 not transferred

    Hi all,
    we are using report RHINTE00 to transfer the assignations with positions and org units made in infotype 1 to PPOME.
    Everything works fine when we are assigning a position and org unit.
    But when we remove the entry and run the report, the assignation in the PPOME still exists..
    Do I have to do something special to delete the relationships ?
    thanks in advance !!

    Hello,
    If you have terminated some employees, to remove relationship without existing objects, you have to use report. RHCHECKRELATIONS. Then if you just need to delimit them, make sure that org. unit exists in table T527X and rerun report RHINTE00. Hope it helps,
    Regards
    Christine

  • Missing BP Userid from Org Assignment

    Hi all,
    Was wondering if this has happened to anyone else.  We are using CRM 5.0 and R/3 4.7.
    We are creating our employees in R/3 using PA30  and transferring BP's to CRM using PFAL P- for person, personnel number and update.
    After we have assigned the employee to the org as a bp but loose the user id occasionally leaving the user without the ability to log in to the IC web Client.  It just disappears from the BP and from the Org assignment.
    Has this happened to anyone else?
    Maggie

    Thank you - we have resolved the issue this way.
    You are correct in that when you transfer an employee from R/3 to CRM using PFAL you must consider the insert vs. update mode.  An insert mode will delete all relationships to the org and update will not. 
    We also found that if the office in the org is not complete with a business partner assigned it will also contribute to the instability of the the position and employees assigned.
    Lastly we modified table T77SO using SM31 and value HRALX PQUAL -  X.
    Doing all these things has kept our employees assigned to the org.
    Maggie

  • Org assignment

    Hi Experts
    I have a requirement to assign org unit to the User via position. We are already live with the data. A user is already assigned to a orgunit. I have to change the org assignment. As we do in PPOMA_BBP manually, is there any FM or BAPI where I can pass the user name & Org unit.
    In PPAOM_BBP we delete the assigment of the orgunit to Position and agian assign a new orgunit to the position of the user.
    I need a code which can do the same.
    Quick response will be appreciated.
    Many Thanks,
    Prasad

    Hi. I can't find a function module, but you can use transaction PP01 to move a position to a new org unit instead. Just maintain the "relationships" infotype.
    You can then do a call transaction or use ECATT to mass maintain the data.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • Regarding Org assignment record create/delete

    Hi All,
    I have created a postion and assigned a holder , as i have doen mistake in period creation i have deleated that position , and created a new postionand holder with correct period.
    but in org assignment infoype 0001 these old and new record got saved.Is there any possibility to deleate thsi record.
    Regards

    Hi
    Do remember that whenever an OBJECT ID start date is wrong, try to correct it with the program. RE_RHBEGDA0. This will correct the start date of the OBJECT IDs.
    I think, the new record is in 0001 - Organisational Assignment.
    1) Try to delete the first record, then go to delete the wrong entry record.
    2) Try to change the first record with the date of the wrong entry date, so that it will get delimited.
    Regards
    Team Member.

  • Doubt about  a null value assigned to a String variable

    Hi,
    I have a doubt about a behavior when assigning a null value to a string variable and then seeing the output, the code is the next one:
    public static void main(String[] args) {
            String total = null;
            System.out.println(total);
            total = total+"one";
            System.out.println(total);
    }the doubt comes when i see the output, the output i get is this:
    null
    nulloneA variable with null value means it does not contains a reference to an object in memory, so the question is why the null is printed when i concatenate the total variable which has a null value with the string "one".
    Is the null value converted to string ??
    Please clarify
    Regards and thanks!
    Carlos

    null is a keyword to inform compiler that the reference contain nothingNo. 'null' is not a keyword, it is a literal. Beyond that the compiler doesn't care. It has a runtime value as well.
    total contains null value means it does not have memory,No, it means it refers to nothing, as opposed to referring to an object.
    for representation purpose it contain "null"No. println(String) has special behaviour if the argument is null. This is documented and has already been described above. Your handwaving about 'for representation purpose' is meaningless. The compiler and the JVM don't know the purpose of the code.
    e.g. this keyword shows a hash value instead of memory addressNo it doesn't: it depends entirely on the actual class of the object referred to by 'this', and specifically what its toString() method does.
    similarly "total" maps null as a literal.Completely meaningless. "total" doesn't 'map' anything, it is just a literal. The behaviour you describe is a property of the string concatenation operator, not of string literals.
    I hope you can understand this.Nobody could understand it. It is compete nonsense. The correct answer has already been given. Please read the thread before you contribute.

  • Impact of changing positions and Org Unit short text

    Hi All..
    This is regarding the impact  of changing positions and Org Unit short text(SAP name - Object Abbreviation, technical field u2013 hrp1000-short).The new approach we are ging to have is to keep short text same across the business unit.
    Example:
    All position in US will have short text u2013 USS
    Similarly All US Org Unit short text will be COMUS
    I was wondering, from SAP best practices point of view, do you see any downside in this approach?
    Example: Any problem in searching position or org using search term.
    Please pin your thoughts...
    Thanks,
    Kumar

    Hi,
    Normally such change will not have any impact in PA module.
    Only in exceptional cases it will have an impact in following cases:
    1. First and mandatory condition that you use abbreviation as position name in IT 0001. If this is the case parameter PLOGI TEXTC (in table T77S0) should be equal X.
    2. Second condition is that parameter PLOGI SPLIT is equal to X. That means that change of object name will lead to record split in IT 0001 in PA.
    So if in table T77S0 you don't have setting PLOGI TEXTC = X and PLOGI SPLIT = X you can go ahead with change of positions abbreviations. It will have no impact on other modules.
    Cheers!

  • FM to create Position and Org  unit

    Hi  Friends-
    What are the Function Module to create  Position and Org unit in  HR ?  
    Regards
    Meeta

    Hi,
    Try this:
    BAPI_HRMASTER_SAVE_REPL_MULT
    BPU_CREATE_ORGUNIT_AND_BUPA
    Refer:
    Re: BAPI or FM to create OrgUnits and positions in Organizational Managemen

  • Teamviewer - All positions in Org Unit display depth between EP5 and EP6

    We are in the process of upgrading our HR Portal from Version 5 to Version 6 (SP14) and have encountered an issue with the Team viewer functionality.
    In our EP5 system when the user selects the dropdown option for 'All positions in org unit' it is picking up our Configuration limiting it to showing only 3 structure levels and when an attempt is made to display lower levels the expander changes but no more levels are shown (e.g. Expander icon changes but does not render the lower level).
    In our EP6 system when the user selects the dropdown option for 'All positions in org unit' it is ignoring the same Configuration and lets the user select down to the bottom of the organisation. This will obviously have serious performance implications and so must be corrected if we are to implement this upgrade.
    To test the situation we deployed the following par files from our EP5 system to our EP6 system and found that we achieved the required result of only allowing the configured levels to be shown:
    com.sap,pct.hcm.objectanddatprovider.par
    com.sap,pct.hcm.orgmanagementeventing.par
    com.sap,pct.hcm.teamviewer.par
    This points to an issue between these files from the EP5 version to the EP6 version.
    Has anyone else experienced an issue with how the EP6 teamviewer handles the 'All positions in Org Unit' selection, and if so can you let me know any solution you have to it?
    (Note: This selection used Eval Path MDTSBESX)
    Message was edited by: Steve Caffrey

    Hello Sandeep,
    Unfortunately the only standard functionality is to change the rankings of the positions within transaction ppome. Therefore you have the buttons 'Move up in rank' and 'Move down in rank' in the overview area of the ppome. As you know if the field PRIOX in the table hrp1001 is empty, the transaction sorts the positions by OBJID. So perhaps you could create a abap program to change this standard functionality to insert values into field PRIOX for the corresponding relationship in HRP1001 that you want to sort.
    Best Regards
    Christine

  • Org.Assignment Infotype start date and End date is getting wrong.

    Hi, When i create a new employee in PA40, in Org. Assignment infotype start date and end date is getting wrong. for eg. When i create an employee on 01.04.2014.    In org. assignment infotype its getting like this. 01.01.2014  to  31.03.9999  and 01.04.9999 to 31.12.9999  Two date entries are creating by default.

    Hi
    Check in the Table - T588Z : Dynamic Actions ,is there any custom routines causing the defaulting dates functionality.
    Thanks,
    Sreeram

Maybe you are looking for