About rotating images and making a PDF

I have roteted some images of an album because they are "vertical". What I want is to make a PDF in which the vertical images appear "vertical" and the horizontal ones in "horizontal", but when I do this action the images rotated (vertical) appear horizontal again.
Is there any way of solve this?

Make sure you aren't using Orientation: Best Fit in
the contact sheet settings.
Ian
Oh, yes I had this option. But I think there´s not solution, if I use Portrait orientation then the horizontal images turn into vertical and viceversa.

Similar Messages

  • I have a Flash Sample to rotate images and text but I not find a way to display special characters

    Hello everyone.
    I bought a very nice Flash application that rotate images, and text of any color and size. It use an XML input file.
    I've posted here, a complete copy, so any of you can download, view and use it freely.
    I would appreciate if any of you know how to do, so that the text displayed, including the characters I use in my language (Spanish), such as á, é, í, ó, ú, ñ, and other special characters.
    In fact, I could not find a way to do it, because I'm not expert Flash, and less in ActionScript.
    If any of you would help me on that, I thank you implement the appropriate adjustments and compressed into a. zip file, and let me know where to download it, or if you prefer you can send it to my email: [email protected]
    After all compressed in .zip format is a very small file: 430K.
    Click here to download the complete sample.
    Thanks.
    =====================================
    Translated using http://translate.google.es
    =====================================

    Hello Rinus,
    If I understood your last post correctly, then problem 2 is resolved, right?
    Regarding problem 3:
    I'm not asking you to share exact VIs.
    I just want to see a very simple VI that explains the concept of what you're trying to do, what should happen (this can be in words that refer to the front panel elements) and what you've tried.
    The terminology you're using isn't clear to me without an extra explanation.
    This could even be only a Front Panel with a few buttons on where you just describe what should happen with specific controls/indicators.
    Based on the first post it is not clear to me what you mean with:
    - A "button element":
      Are you talking about a control, an indicator, a cluster that contains multiple control?
    - The structure:
      Is this an event structure, case structure, for loop, ...?
    Is it seems like you want to programmatically control Front Panel objects, which on itself is no problem at all independent of how many objects you want to control.
    Please share with me simple example of what goes wrong and explain which things should happen on that specific Front Panel.
    This will allow me to help you and also allow me to guide you along the right path.
    Kind Regards,
    Thierry C - Applications Engineering Specialist Northern European Region - National Instruments
    CLD, CTA
    If someone helped you, let them know. Mark as solved and/or give a kudo.

  • Rotating images and links

    I have a website that uses include commands to insert shtml files into different sections of my home page. I would like to have rotating images and text links in one of the include sections. For example, image one shows up with link to URL #1, then image two shows up with link to URL#2. Any thoughts on how to easily accomplish this? Would I use Flash, javascript?
    Thanks,
    Elliott

    This one uses JavaScript.
    http://www.dynamicdrive.com/dynamicindex14/fadeinslideshow.htm
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists
    www.alt-web.com/
    www.twitter.com/altweb
    www.alt-web.blogspot.com

  • How do I prevent Adobe from taking my jpegs and making them pdf files? I have had to uninstall Adobe to access my photos as jpegs.

    How do I prevent Adobe from taking my jpegs and making them pdf files? I have had to uninstall Adobe to access my photos as jpegs.

    I would suggest you change your file associations so that jpgs open in a program other than Acrobat.  Assuming you have a Windows machine, just go to the Start, and search for "file associations" ... it's part of the Control Panel.
    Scroll down to the file type jpg, and set it to open with whatever graphic preview or editing program you have that you want to use as the default.  From that point on, when you click on a jpg, it should not open Acrobat and instantly try to convert it to a pdf.

  • Rotating Images and shapes indesign, pixelated?

    Hello,
    I am currently working on a magazine from scratch, and i am having this trouble of pixelated images and shapes, when i rotate them.
    I sat the file on a high quality display, and exported it to PDF... images and shapes still look like shattered....
    Please advise, i need to fix this issue
    Thanks

    1st picture : exported pdf
    2nd picture: indesign file
    3rd picture: PDF Settings
    i am using an acrobat X pro and im using settings such as JPEG 2000 losless / res 300 ppi / JPEG QUALITY HIGH ( check 3rd image )

  • Rotating images and PDFs arbitrary in Viewer

    All my scans are slightly out of rectangularity, because my scanner ist not running correctly.
    Is there a way to rotate in finer degrees than 90/180 etc.) Maybe the automator gives a clue?

    Most image editing applications will do that. Some will look for horizontal lines and do it automatically. Others will let you choose two points on a horizontal line. I have straightened scans with Photoshop Elements, Gimp, and Graphic Converter.
    Of course, often the original is not straight, and sometimes different parts of an image are not parallel to other parts. The scanner may not be the problem.

  • Imported image and making white space transparent...

    I need to make the white space around an image transparent without having to use the clipping mask tool. In Freehand, you simply click a button and the white background disappears. I need to use that exact technique to hide the white background.
    How can I do this in InDesign?
    Thank you.

    There's quick, and there's right. They're rarely in the same space.
    To make a transparent background can be a complex and fussy process. While InDesign could include a general tool to do so, it would likely be inferior to actually making the image background transparent in a native image editing tool.
    I've found most such embedded features to be adequate only for low end work - e.g., they leave a background halo on the image, or a noisy edge, or other image problems. I really don't see it as a flaw or omission that ID forces you to use a proper tool to create the background transparency.

  • Question about brightening images and automating layers

    I've been using Photoshop CS5 for a while now but there are still a few things I'm wondering about.
    The first is about brightening an image without adding or reducing too much contrast at the same time.  If I increase the Brightness slider in the Brightness/Contrast window it often adds too much unwanted contrast and will wash out parts of the image or cause too much saturation.  Same thing when using Curves to brighten the image.  On the other hand I've found that using Levels to brighten the image reduces too much contrast and desaturates the image too much...and then when I add more contrast in afterward, parts of the image will become washed out again.  So far the best solution I've found has been to brighten the images with Shadows/Highlights, but this will often pose its own set of problems by creating or eliminating shadows in a way that doesn't flatter the image.  It can also add too much contrast in some cases.  Is there any other way around this that I'm missing?  Or is this all to be expected when brightening images?  The only other workaround I've found has been to add in separate un-affected layers for the areas of the picture that become too washed out when the brightness is increased but then there's always a problem of getting those parts of the picture to match up with the rest afterward.
    The second is about having layers for each change applied to an image.  Is there any way to have each change that is applied to an image automatically also be made into its own separate layer?  For example, if I sharpen a part of the image that would automatically become layer 2, then if I adjusted the saturation that would automatically become layer 3 and so on.  I know the History Panel does something very similar to this, and that's the type of thing I'm looking for, but I'd like each of those changes being made into a layer instead of just a recorded history state.  This way, for example, I could individually adjust each change with the opacity slider and compare the image with and without some of the changes by clicking the eye icon next to each layer.  I know new layers can be created manually but I'm looking for some way to automate it.
    Thanks for the help.

    The second is about having layers for each change applied to an image.  Is there any way to have each change that is applied to an image automatically also be made into its own separate layer?  For example, if I sharpen a part of the image that would automatically become layer 2, then if I adjusted the saturation that would automatically become layer 3 and so on.  I know the History Panel does something very similar to this, and that's the type of thing I'm looking for, but I'd like each of those changes being made into a layer instead of just a recorded history state.  This way, for example, I could individually adjust each change with the opacity slider and compare the image with and without some of the changes by clicking the eye icon next to each layer.  I know new layers can be created manually but I'm looking for some way to automate it.
    You seem to have no firm grasp yet on the concept of non-destructive image editing using Photoshop’s existing options, specifically Adjustment Layers, Smart Objects/Smart Filters and Layer Masks.
    The Layers structure is a much more valuable tool than the History in my opinion.
    Instead of applying an Adjustment or Filter destructively you might want to try applying it as an Adjustment Layer or a Smart Filter (either with its own Mask or on a copy of the Smart Object with a Layer Mask, because all Smart Filters applied to one instance of a Smart Object must share one Mask).
    Those Layers can subsequently be changed with regard to Opacity, Blend Mode etc. or the Adjustment and Filter settings themselves.

  • Help needed after uploading photos to my PC and being unable to rotate images and video

    HELP!!
    When I connect my iphone to my PC it imports all pics and video. Then when I go into the folder located where these images are located in my C drive and I want to rotate a photo (and video) that was taken upright on my iphone, I get a warning message stating "you cannot rotate this image. The file might be in use or open in another program or the file or folder might be read only"
    How do I edit and rotate these photos and videos so I can actually use them on my PC???
    Thank you!!!

    Yes, due to Incomplete Software Update on your iPhone your Device is now in Recovery Mode and you cannot take a Backup now. But if you have taken a backup earlier then you can Restore that backup on your iPhone after you Reset your iPhone to Factory Settings.

  • Images and graphics in PDF turn black upon upload onto a website

    Hi there!
    I have a problem with a pdf file that I have uploaded onto a website in the process of creating a self published book.  It appears fine when I view it as a pdf prior to upload but, once I upload it, some of the images are replaced by black boxes.  This seems to be the case no matter what browser is used. Any ideas of the cause or how this can be fixed?  the pdf is a compilation of a number of student pdf's that I combined into one so, I don't have the original files used to create the pdf (in design, etc).
    thanks for any advice or help that you can offer

    Here is an example PDF, I had to take a screen shot so I could clear out the customer data. This is before we upload it to the investors website. Keep in mind this is a single page out of hundreds that look fine.
    http://imgur.com/4dKQt1H
    This is the after shot. The "fannie mae" logo is "blacked out."
    http://imgur.com/ved34Om

  • Importing Images and Making Mask's with shape's "HELP PLEASE"

    Hey,
    So two things, I have Motion 3 and every time I try to import my photos from Aperture into motion, motion stretches my photo out. The photos are regular jpeg res around 2304-1536 is this to high of a resolution, any tips? Last thing, so I want to import a whole bunch of photos into motion and make kinda a montage with the photo's but in a shape of a heart (valentines day) I cant seem to mask the heart that motion has in it's library to a photo how do you do this and can I mask a group of pics as a heart shape?
    Thanks so much!

    Yes, the picture may be a bit too large and you will asking Motion to a bit of unnecessary heavy lifting.
    However do you want the heart to mask the entire montage? If so apply to the group containing the photos.
    Peter

  • About saving images and file formats

    This question was posted in response to the following article: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/photoshopelements/using/WS287f927bd30d4b1f89cffc612e28adab65-7 fd9.html

    . I was able to do, what I was unable to do in last 2 days.
    I just wanted to point that, with iPhot 11, which I am using,  iPhoto menu ->Preferences->General-> ,Edit Photos pulldown menu did not appear. This step #2, where selection of  Photoshop Element had to to be done with use of "Advanced" menu.
    Thank you for the help.
    Aziz

  • Inability to use eps graphics in Word 2007 and make a pdf

    Hi there …
    I work at a small "intellectual capital" company where virtually all of our documents (our products!) depend on embedding eps "pictures" into Word and pdf'ing the result.  While this process works great in Word 2003, it fails miserably in Word 2007 - the "mechanics" work fine and a pdf is produced, but the rendering of the eps images are terrible.  I spent some effort looking into this issue trying to find a solution and came up with the following (thanks in part to this post) ... if anyone has any more details, corrections, or solutions feel free to post!
    It appears that, over the years, there have been three flavors of eps import filters for Word ... (for the curious the filter is found in Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Grphflt\EPSIMP32.FLT )
    The simplest (and oldest) filter basically embeds the eps code unmodified into the Word doc and will display a raster preview of the image if one is included in the eps file.  if the file is printed on a postscript printer or to Acrobat, the eps code is passed through (so it produces perfect pdfs, and the screen image in Word looks as good as the preview image embedded in the eps file). if the file is printed to a generic printer, no image appears (so it doesn't work for joe user).
    The Word 2003-era filter pastes the eps code unmodified into the Word doc, then renders a (very poor) preview image (using an OEM'd eps converter).  if a preview image is in the eps file it is ignored (which is bad).  if the file is printed on a postscript printer or to Acrobat, the unmodified eps code is passed through (so it produces perfect pdfs, though the screen image in Word looks yucky). if the file is printed to a generic printer, the poorly rendered preview image is printed (so it works poorly but better than nothing for joe user - and probably gives joe user a bad impression of eps).
    In what might be an attempt to improve things for joe user, the Word 2007 filter immediately interprets the eps code (using a slightly updated eps converter from the same OEM) and pastes the resulting rendered image into Word. It NO LONGER embeds the unmodified eps code in the Word doc. While the rendered image looks better than filter #2, it still leaves A LOT to be desired - in my brief testing, colors are VERY wrong and curves become choppy. if the file is printed on a postscript printer or to Acrobat, the poorly rendered image is used since the original eps code is gone (unacceptable for my purposes). if the file is printed to a generic printer, the poorly rendered image is printed (so it works better than Word 2003 for joe user).
    So where does this leave anyone that wants to upgrade to Word 2007, use eps images, and make quality pdfs ??
    Filters #1 & #2 were interchangeable in Word 2003.  The true eps experts like #1 the best, and it is by far the simplest technically (76k of code vs 400+k), so they merrily swapped and used it with Word 2003.  (Very) unfortunately filters #1 and #2 do not work with Word 2007 - if they did the problem would be nicely solved.
    Find another graphics file format to work with?  This is undesirable because the "beauty" of #1 & #2 above is the unmodified eps code gets fed to the pdf maker (which itself is native eps) - Word is just a transport (no "transcoding" loss in compression-speak).  if there were an efficient way to convert eps to say wmf (microsoft's proprietary vector graphic format), and the images were able to survive two transcodes (from eps to wmf back to eps for pdf), it might be livable. But of course Adobe Illustrator cannot save as wmv (nor should it IMHO).  Of note - there is another industry standard vector format - svg - which AI can save as but Word does not support. 
    Stay in Word 2003 doc format while using Word 2007 (don't use docx).  Doesn't work. My testing shows a Word 2003 doc file with embedded eps created in Word 2003 (and pdf's correctly in Word 2003) does not pdf correctly in Word 2007.
    Use a work-around. As suggested here, "Open the EPS in Illustrator. Select all, and Edit > Copy. In Word, Edit > Paste Special > Enhanced Metafile."  This seems to work for small images such as logos, but not for larger graphical stuff (probably because of the internal transcoding to WMF).
    Stay with Word 2003.  This appears to be the only workable option for now IF you want to use Word and render eps pictures in pdf's with acceptable quality.
    IMHO the best solution would be to have the very simple 76k filter #1 ported to Word 2007 (those who need the capability can swap the filter files) or (not as optimal but does not require swapping filter files) add the option in filter #3 to still embed the eps code.  Microsoft is the right place to do it, or (politics aside), Adobe could and should do it (given some support from MSFT).
    I am surprised this issue has not caused more rumblings from users - perhaps it has, the symptoms are just worded differently.  Or maybe everyone is just staying with Word 2003 (which is what I have done until now).  The problem is most companies are being forced to upgrade now, so I think this will become a bigger issue for Adobe / Microsoft going forward.
    Thanks for listening.  I look forward to your comments.
    Andy

    Microsoft has released a hot fix that supposedly addresses this issue, it is at
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977468
    I downloaded the fix and tried it; it actually made the problem worse!  Apparently they
    are trying to fix their filter rather than bypassing it.  What I am doing is
    1.  Making maps in AutoCaD Map and printing (plotting in autocad) them to a pdf file
    2.  Opening the pdf file in Acrobat and resaving it as eps
    3.  Importing the eps file into a Word 2007 document
    4.  Use Acrobat to convert the Word document to pdf
    Before the hot fix when I did the process the resolution of the map in the final
    pdf file was not as good as in the original made from AutoCad.  Also the colors were
    not correct.  After installing the hotfix there are still these same problems but also now
    any non horizontal text is not displaying correctly.
    Be careful about trying this hotfix.
    As others have noted, back in Word 2003 the above steps 1 - 4 worked very well and resulted
    in a high quality pdf file with the map as good as in the original pdf.

  • Rotated Images? WHAT THE FRACK?!

    I don't understand this. Whenever I take an image, and place it on the desktop (Drag/Drop, or from Safari 'Save to Desktop'), it disappears off the desktop, and a folder is created called 'Rotated Images', and it's rotated. Even if I make it rotated back the way it's supposed to be through Preview, once it's back on the desktop, it auto rotates back and goes into the newly automatically created folder..
    How do I disable this feature?

    Try this in another browser and see if this still happening.
    Firefox http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/
    Photoscene
    PowerBook G4 17 inch, PowerBook G4 12 inch   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   Tiger/Panther

  • Noob question about HDR images

    hi everybody! i am reading this book about photoshop hoping to understand a lot more than i already know about pixels and colors and image dinamics and such..i got to the chapter about HDR images and here's what i dont get. as i understand, given a HDR image it has 32 bit depth meaning its file contains much more information about contrast and brightness than any existing monitor can output, so when u open it in photoshop u will never see its true quality. my question is( and i admit it may seem pointless to some, but i am committed to understand the cause and purpose), when converting it to 8 or 16 bit depth this window pops up asking me to tweak gamma, exposure, shadows and highlights, etc., but why is this linked to the conversion process? why not simply convert it, maintain the same appearance as before and then if needed manually adjust using all the image controls from the photoshop menus? i have CS6, if that matters.

    I don't know if this will help, but I've heard about HDR monitors (still very expensive), which supposedly very accurately display the HDR values. If you hang one on the wall in your house, people might think it's a window, since it is literally a source of light, in the same way a window to the outside world is.
    Possibly the most surprising use of HDR imagery is in 3D apps where global illumination models are used. HDR imagery literally is the only source of light for these images. There are no lights in the scene, only HDR imagery. This is because of the great dynamic range of HDR.
    A more practical (to me) use of HDR is when resurrecting antique images. If you scan multiple exposures from old prints, then create HDR, sculpting values in 16-bit becomes a very powerful tool, only due to the HDR value range.
    Photoshop, although it can edit very well in 16-bit, can only show 8-bit representations of HDR imagery, since almost all monitors are 8-bits per channel. Because of the monitors, we can only see a small part of what is actually present in the HDR file.
    I've never done it, but I imagine that if we all had HDR monitors, we'd need to wear protective glasses (like you wear driving in your car when the sun is out) most of the time to do our work.  :+)

Maybe you are looking for