About search box

Hi All,
I would like to know more about search box.
Thanks,
Sam

Hi Sam,
You can create a normal SQL report with the search option Enable = 'Yes' ( This option comes just after you specify the SQL query and click next , you can see the last option as Enable Search (by default it is set to No).
Once you create this sql report go to the report tab and look at the report query. You can understand the search functionality very easily from there. Thanks.
Regards,
Manish

Similar Messages

  • About search box problem

    I'm having problem with the search box on my computer. There is no more search box in start menu and computer. what i have to do for remedy? please suggest me drivers or else..

    Hi,
    Try some of the general steps first and check.
    i. Go to Control Panel ---> Then Click on Programs or Programs and Features --> Click Turn Windows Features ON or OFF --> In Windows Features windows scroll down and check if Windows Search Box is ticked as shown in the pic below ..If not then click and add the tick mark.
    If the above doesnt work then you can try performing a System Restore to an earlier date and check.
    Restoring Windows to a Previous Point (Windows 7)
    Let me know if the above steps did not fix the issue..
    Note:
    If you have HP Support Assistant installed on the computer(The Blue Question Mark) then open it ==> Complete all pending Updates & Tuneups==> Restart and Check. It may solve your problem
    Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP.
    **Click on “Kudos” Star if you think this reply helped** Or Mark it as "Solved" if issue got fixed.

  • Question about the  "Suggestions" feature in the search box

    How can you tell if the “Suggestions” in the search box are generic or part of my own browsing history? Can the suggestion history be cleared?

    Hey Andy..thanks for the response. The reason I asked is when I start typing in the search box a drop down list of suggestions appears and some of the suggestions I'm not sure where they are coming from. Also, I thought maybe it was based on my own browsing. Example I was typing in a name and it started suggesting specific people. Curious if was because I had gone to their website in the past or it was based juts on my location and the algorithms of the search engine to make a suggestion.  I have even cleared my browsing history but the same suggestions come up. 

  • Who Decided to Combine the Search Box and Address Bar?

    A very wise person once said:
    "Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler!"
    That fundamental rule of design has been volated with Internet Explorer 9.
    I've been using IE9 for about a month now, trying to get used to all the new things.  Performance-wise it's nice, and the changes to security are welcome.  Okay, so the color-management is half baked, and it still has its problems, but I guess
    it's an improvement.
    But what idiot decided to make the search box and the address field one and the same?
    You think I'm being petty?  Go try to research what a particular file is - for example, go see if you can find info on "bib.dll".
    It wants to make it into a URL.  It's not a URL.  It may LOOK like one, but it's a name, honest! 
    Putting quotes around it doesn't help.  Maybe I'm missing the advanced syntax it takes to get such a thing to be a search term instead of a URL. Even if so, how is this an improvement or simplification?  It's certainly not intuitively obvious how
    to force a search, short of dredging up a link to Google and typing info in there directly.
    Doing a search and typing in an address are two FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS.
    And hey, it's not a big deal that you can no longer see what it was you searched for, and maybe even edit it and search again.  No, because now the search engine pages have to waste space to put up a box showing what you just searched for, since it's
    now GONE out of the address field.
    How does stuff like this pass a design review?
    And to think the Microsoft Engineers worked extra hard to take it out.
    You Engineers at Microsoft need to take the product back from your moronic marketing people and make it actually work right.
    -Noel

    Ed, with 36 years software engineering experience, I know the difference between the difficulty of adapting to change and when something just isn't right.
    This isn't right.  Ever hear the phrase "apples and oranges" to describe two things that don't go together?  That concept fits well here.
    You say that thinking along the lines of "you no longer had to think about which box you want to type into" helped justify the change. 
    Is there something wrong with thinking?  This is akin to saying, "you no longer had to think about which nozzle at the gas station to fill your tank from". 
    Diesel doesn't work in a gas engine.  Nor does the water from the garden hose.
    You say "both methods of typing work in the one box".  But they don't, logically!  Did you actually read this thread? 
    Is there something wrong with logic?
    Alas, what the simple users of the general public want and what experienced computer users need are clearly two different things, and it's clear looking back that this move simply marked another step in Microsoft's clear intent
    to walk away from making serious computer operating systems that actually
    work.  Windows 8 is testament to that (and don't tell me you haven't noticed all the negative response).  Other such things include Windows Search - which is designed to be unable to actually do an exhaustive search...  Even going
    back as far as hiding file extensions by default.  And don't get me started on the use of telemetry to justify deprecating such things as Windows Backup.
    Do you understand the difference between leading and following?  Which, as a concept, would you say is better?  You need to stay the hell away from trying to emulate what Google does.  You can do better!  If you want a different
    example, follow Firefox - it still has a search box.  Even Apple - known for dumbing things down to the level of the family dog - stil puts a search box in Safari.
    I don't mean to be critical of your response, Ed, but this is a good example of "the operation was a success but the patient died".
    Thank goodness there are 3rd party developers who are struggling to put back functionality Microsoft keeps removing.  But then Microsoft removes the APIs they use.  That's not going to keep!
    P.S., Watch the film "Idiocracy" some time.
    -Noel
    Detailed how-to in my eBooks:  
    Configure The Windows 7 "To Work" Options
    Configure The Windows 8 "To Work" Options

  • How to get rid of the stupid drop down box in the search box

    Thank-you for the help. I am not sure if I put this is the right spot or not, but I wanted to take the time to say thank-you to the people who answered :
    "Chosen solution
    If you want to restore the previously used standalone window to manage search engines then you can toggle this pref to false with a middle-click on the about:config page.
    about:config page: browser.search.showOneOffButtons = false
    Close and restart Firefox to the change effective. "
    I LOVE Firefox but it is so frustrating when I can't just right click and "paste and search"
    i have to do A LOT of searching for work and I had to switch to chrome for a few days until I found this solution because the new search box messed with our internal software (sorry I would tell you more but I don't really understand computers that much, but I am so glad to have my old friendly fox back!!!)... Thanks guys, Brit

    thanks for the feedback - since your question doesn't really contain any other request for support, i'm going to close the thread...

  • Why won't my "searchpreview" add-on work from my browser search box since Firefox updated to 3.6.16, but it works when I do it from the Google main page??

    Since Firefox updated itself to 3.6.16 earlier today, when I search for anything in my Google search box on the browser, it always used to show me thumbnails when the Google page came up. Now there are no thumbnails appearing, except if I go on the Google main page and search from there, the thumbnails still appear. Whe it updated, the browser automatically searched for incompatability problems with my add-ons but nothing appeared to say Searchpreview was incompatible.

    You can modify the pref <b>keyword.URL</b> on the <b>about:config</b> page to use Google's "I'm Feeling Lucky" or Google's "Browse By Name".
    * Google "I'm Feeling Lucky": http://www.google.com/search?btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=
    * Google "Browse by Name": http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/keyword.URL
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Location_Bar_search

  • I just bought an iPhone 4s. Now the search iphone function is not working. When I swipe the screen to the left, the search box appears but when I type what I want to search for, there is no action. Please help.

    I just got an iphone 4s. Now the search iphone function is not working. When I swipe the start screen, the search box shows up. But when I type what I want to search, there is no action. Please help.

    Try this...
    You will Not Lose Any Data...
    Turn the Phone Off... ( if it isn’t already )
    Press and Hold the Sleep/Wake Button and the Home Button at the Same Time...
    Wait for the Apple logo to Appear and then Disappear...
    Usually takes about 15 - 20 Seconds... (But can take Longer...)
    Release the Buttons...
    Turn the Phone On...

  • How to make a report based on a search box containg IDs for multiple rows

    Hello everyone,
    I'm using APEX to build a database application. My users want to search a table by submitting multiple IDs in a search box. They want to list the row IDs for all the rows they want to search in one input box, and after clicking the Submit botton, all the rows should be displyed. Any idea to make it with APEX. I appreciate all your help.
    Guang

    Unless your search is all numbers, each one will have to be separated by a '. That's probably why the multiple select isn't working. Try and add that around your SQL query, but I think you'll have to escape it for it to work.
    And about the error-checking, you can create a short PL/SQL snippet to check/format the string in :PXX_SEARCH. You could start with something as simple as having it attach the ' you''ll need.
    declare
      srch_tmp     VARCHAR2(200);
    begin
      srch_tmp   := ''||:PXX_SEARCH||'';
      :PXX_SEARCH   := srch_tmp;
    end;Note that this is incomplete and won't do everything you need. You'll have to use some string manipulators like REGEXP to parse the search string.
    Edited by: blarman74 on Nov 12, 2009 10:06 AM

  • I cannot find my iPhoto upgrader in Finder...I was told to go to the Go menu and click on Utilities...this is not an offered option...and nothing comes up in the search box...

    I cannot find my iPhoto upgrader in Finder...I was told to go to the Go menu and click on Utilities...this is not an offered option...and nothing comes up in the search box...I have upgraded to OS X Yosemite, downloaded the iPhoto app to go with it, and the iPhoto upgrader...just can't find the upgrader...

    In the finder applications folder ==> Utilities  --  double click the iphoto library upgrader and then launch iphoto 9.6.1
    iPhoto '11 or later: About the Library Upgrader - Apple Support

  • I would like to know how to force Firefox search box results to open in a new tab?

    Results from any entry into the Firefox search box currently return in the tab that's open, regardless the location.
    Is there a way to force "open in a new tab" without having to open a blank tab to keep the results from changing the current tab to the search resource location?

    For the Google search bar on the Navigation toolbar you can set the pref browser.search.openintab to true on the about:config page.
    See http://kb.mozillazine.org/about%3Aconfig

  • Is there a way to search several keywords at a time on the top right search box?

    Hello.
    Let's say I want all the images to appear that have any of these keywords:  "sky, mountain, water".  The only way I have figured out it takes too long and it's tedious.  I open the "find" window and manually add search variables to look for several keywords and file names for the values that I am looking for.
    Isn't there a way to search for files that have any of the keywords I write on the search box by dividing these keywords with commas or any other puntuation? Or am I stuck opening the "find" window and add rows of variables that I want to search?

    I really do hope you are part of the development team for the Bridge.
    If only…
    I'm just a user like you and almost all other participants. Steve (SG) is one of the very helpful Adobe Engineers who occasionally hang around every now and then but they do so out of personal interest and kindness. They also try to be a shortcut to the Bridge engineers, it is no company policy to interact directly with developers on this user to user forum...
    But if I was responsible for resources for the Bridge development team they already would have had loads of money to realize my perfect Bridge and this process would have started from CS3 and above…. but as said, I'm just a humble photographer with no knowledge at all in programming applications and by far not enough money to realize this dream app
    Regarding your Find comments, I do realize there are some extra actions needed and the less you can make the better it would be. However as said, I don't know of any DAM application capable of what you want.
    It is kind of looking into a database and that needs separate criteria to my knowledge. If I had to use the search function that much I would look for a dedicated Digital Asset Manager to do this tasks.
    I'm not very deep in to knowledge about DAM but I use Canto Cumulus Single user for my Archive which is much faster then Bridge (Bridge is much better in other tasks so I need both).
    In Canto you can create a query to customize your own search needs in a better way but this needs some extra knowledge and study, I have only 65 K of files in my archive and searching is not that difficult using the normal route of quick find.
    And to comfort you a little, both Bridge and Canto do reopen the find menu with the last settings which is still not ideal but saves a bit of moves. Having the option to save templates like in batch rename would be a big plus but it is not an option yet.
    And of course, you can also put in a feature request for this:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/

  • How can I let the Applications can be found out in "Settings" feild of Search box in Windows 8 and later.

    As we know, there are several feild in Search box since Windows 8.
    About my program: It is an EXE item for PC settings, and I have add it to Control Panel. It can be find out in the Search box of Control Panel. But I can not find it in Search box in the Start Menu of Windows 10 OR the one in the METRO UI of
    Windows 8/8.1. What should I do for this? I want to let it can be find out in the "Settings" Feild of Search.
    At begining I think as soon as I let it support the Search Box in Control Panel page, then it must can be find out in StartMenu or Metro UI. Because I have seen the original Control Panel items(Contained by Microsoft Windows OS) can support StartMenu 
    or Metro UI Search("Settings" Feild). and the descriptions in the search result are the same as those result in Control panel Search Page. So I guess they may share some configrations, such as the tasklink file?
    Below shows the same descriptions between Control Panel Search results and Metro UI Search result:
    MS Community Message

    '''about:config'''
    Firefox runs in one process regardless of how many tabs or windows are open; always been that way. Firefox 3.6.4 and newer run some plugins in its' own process. <br />
    http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin-container_and_out-of-process_plugins

  • Can't load any websites. I do not get any "error messages", the "enter" button has no effect in the address bar. Works fine in the FF search box and in IE.

    Entering a URL in the address bar and hitting enter does nothing. Neither the "enter" button or "address bar arrow", for going to the website, function. Website does not load and no error messages appear. "Enter" button works fine in the FF search box and in IE, so it's not my keyboard.
    Tried most of the recommended fixes under the "Error loading websites" article with the exception of "DNS refetching", as typing "about:config" in the location bar does no good as the "enter button" won't function. I've removed and re-added FF back into the windows firewall, removed ZoneAlarm from my system, edited proxy settings, deleted and reinstalled FF several times. NOTHING WORKS!!! I'm a die hard FF fan and this is KILLING me. Please HELP!!!

    You have a lot of information in packed in the "More system details..." (in the right-hand column), where it looks like you found a solution. If not take a look at "Problematic Extensions" the AVG Free installation of their "'''AVG Free Search'''" can cause such problems. Directions to fix that are specific and involve reinstalling AVG Free without the Link Scanner component.
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problematic_extensions

  • I can't get rid of iMesh search box - got rid of toolbar but not search box - it is not included in add-ons

    I downloaded iMesh thinking it was just a normal music-streaming site. However, it downloads a toolbar and search box. I seemed to have deleted the toolbar with no problem. However, the search box is still there, to the right of the navigation box, and if I go to Tools - manage Add-ons, it is not listed there at all. Is there a way to remove the search box without uninstalling the program or is it better to uninstall it? My virus/anti-malware programs do not report any risks associated with the program and it is handy to find audio streams on the Internet, so I would keep it if it is not harmful. The search box is not causing any problems, I'm just concerned because it was put there without my agreement and does not seem to be removable from the Tools menu. I use Google or Norton Safesearch and would not use iMesh for general searches.

    Hi Gnib, First go to start>control panel>add/remove Programs. In add/remove
    programs there will be "Media Bar" once you click on it to remove it,then it says
    remove "media bar 2.0". Get rid of that also. Now go into your "add-ons
    and extensions". There will be something about the imesh toolbar. Uninstall
    that. Go into start>programs. If imesh is there, delete that too.
    If this doesn't work for you. Tell me what you first did to remove imesh.

  • RE: Firefox search box - manage search engines - get more search engines.. IT DOESN'T WORK , I now get 1000's of useless irrelevant results, PLEASE FIX THE SITES SEARCH NOW, IT'S COMPLETELY USELESS NOW

    RE: Firefox search box -> manage search engines -> get more search engines..
    IT DOESN'T WORK
    I just want to add youtube + some others to the list of sites in the Firefox search box, I now get 1000's of useless irrelevant results, PLEASE FIX THE SITES SEARCH NOW, IT'S COMPLETELY USELESS NOW

    Hi Kvoter,
    What are you hoping for, firefox to display lists of sites you have visited or bookmarked ?
    *''' it should be able to do that'''
    * my firefox does that
    I am only a fellow ordinary user of Firefox & XP, but maybe the problem is on your machine, rather than needing a fix from firefox. If you take a little time to read this you may be able to sort out the problems yourself.
    I hope you do not mind me covering a few basics:
    * the [[Search bar]] { <-- clickable link -- ] is designed to produce a lot or results, whereas
    *the [[Location bar search|Location Bar]] is a lot more specific and may be [[Location bar autocomplete#w_controlling-behavior|set]] to include or exclude History & or [[bookmarks]]
    If you are getting literally 1000s of totally unrelated results you may need to consider [[Is my Firefox problem a result of malware]]
    Hope to hear that you have solved the problem, or a bit more detail about what still is a problem.
    John

Maybe you are looking for