About sum function

I use 'select sum(xx) ..' to get a value,if the value>=10,000,000 and oracle round the value,
for example,
if the value is 10,000,000.58,oracle display 10,000,001,
if the value 9,999,999.01 oracle display 9,999,999.01
who can tell me why?thank you very much!

I've tried exactly what you suggested, and did not have any problems. I used 8.0.4 and 8.1.7
Step by Step:
create table test1 (field1 number(13,2));
insert into test1 values(24.59);
insert into test1 values(1000000);
set numwidth 15
column field1 format 999,999,999,999.99
select sum(field1) field1 from test1;
FIELD1
1,000,024.59
insert into test1 values(100000000);
select sum(field1) field1 from test1;
FIELD1
101,000,024.59
insert into test1 values(10000000000.50);
select sum(field1) field1 from test1;
FIELD1
10,101,000,025.09
null

Similar Messages

  • Strange error in SUM function in XI

    Hi geeks,
    We are encountering a strange issue in SUM functionality in XI.
    The Scenario is :
    We have a pipe delimited source file and INVOIC01 idoc as target.  each line in the source file will create a segment E1EDP01 in the target IDOC.
    All the values given in the file should be summed and mapped to E1EDS01 segment in the idoc.
    In one such strange case the sum of the values generated by the SUM function in XI is 2 cents lesser what we manually calculate using Calculator or Excel . There are about 100+ items in the file.  This not the case always it happens once in a while.
    Have any of you faced such strange errors. If yes please throw some light on the solution for this issue.
    Thanks,
    Noorul

    Hi folks,
    Thanks for your help. I solved this by writing my own code
    double sum = 0;
    String value;
    for (int i= 0; i< a.length; i++)
    sum = sum + Double.parseDouble(a<i>);
    value = Double.toString(sum);
    BigDecimal  bg1 = new BigDecimal(value);
    BigDecimal bg2 = bg1.setScale(2, BigDecimal.ROUND_HALF_DOWN);
    result.addValue(bg2.toString());

  • Incorrect sum function result in invoice

    I'm a Numbers noob, so apologies if this has been covered elsewhere, but I couldn't find it.This issue causes me no issues in Excel but doesn't work properly in Numbers, so I'm wondering what gives.
    I have an invoice for my clients where I have multiple rows, each with a service item, followed by the number of hours spent on that, followed by a cell with an EQUAL function, ie 2/3 of an hour x $40 per hour, which correctly EQUALs as $26.66. (The EQUAL cell is set to formatted as currency to 2 decimal places)
    If a second item appears that has say 1/3 of an hour x $40 per hour, this correctly EQUALs as $13.33.
    However when I total the EQUALs column with a SUM function, it shows $40, not $39.99. As the cells are only formatted to 2 decimal points, and all are formatted as currency, where could the error be happening?
    My clients accounting dept keeps coming back and complaining about my invoices being incorrect... I can't believe that Numbers can't do a SUM function.

    Hi Fritz,
    1/3 and 2/3 are not exact numbers. They go to infinity.
    Column B is formatted as Fraction
    Column C is formatted as Number (Decimals Auto)
    Formula in C2 (and Fill Down)
    =B2
    Formula in D2 (and Fill Down)
    =C2×40
    The Numbers app is correctly rounding to two decimal places.
    If you display Column C as Number to 2 decimal places,
    Again, correct.
    Your clients are quibbling about $0.0000000000000000000 (to infinity) then a infinitesimal part of 1 cent. Which is nonsense!
    Shops also round the total invoice up or down.
    If you work an extra 10 minutes, that will equal exactly 0.5 hours.
    If you work 5 minutes less, that will equal exactly 0.25 hours.
    No rounding needed, and no argument from your clients!
    Regards,
    Ian.

  • SUM function resulting WRONG values when some cell contains a string

    A very strange problem that can result in wrong financial calculations and big mistakes...
    If we have SUM function for some range of cells and one of them is treated as text string (I mean it's number in fact but Number is sure it's text string). than SUM function calulates ALL cells except this sell silently without errors and results in wrong result.
    For example we have cells and values
    A B
    =====
    1| 15 USD
    2| 0 USD
    3| 37 USD
    4| 1 USD
    5| 3 USD
    here the function SUM(B1:B5) should provide the result "56 USD"
    But if cell B5 is treated as text string (it can be still displayed as "3 USD" so we don't know it's treated as text string for some reason) than SUM(B1:B5) swill answer "53 USD".
    The problem is we DON'T know cell B5 is treated as text and we are fully sure that we have the correct sum of all 5 cells, in reality we see sum of 4 cells only....
    I think anybody working with financial or other important data can imagine how dangerous this SUM behaviour is.... I encountered several times that when importing data from Excel or by other ways numbers are imported as text strings. So if I have a lot of cells I'm not sure if all those cells are correctly styled or some of them for some unknown reason is treated as text string.
    In Microsoft Excel there is a very right solution. In MS Excel if any cell in the SUM is wrong format the SUM function simply provides error as a result. But in Numbers SUM doesn't tell us about error, it simply provides us with a wrong result!
    With formal logic the way SUM works in Numbers is total idiotism. If I ask to SUM B1:B5 than I definitely ask to sum ALL 5 cells, not 4, not 3, not 6 but 5 definite cells. If Numbers can't sum those exactly those 5 cells the only answer of the function should be ERROR.
    But Apple Numbers answers me some result of summing those cells that it's able to sum. Apple Numbers SUM function is not confused that I asked for SUM of 5 (not 4 or 3) cells and I expect to have this sum as a result.
    In fact Apple uses the right logic when we use another formula. If we use =B1B2+B3+B4B5 and any cell contains text string that we'll have error result the sam as in Microsoft Excel. So in this example Numbers behaves correctly.
    So why SUM (B1:B5) can provide totally different result as =B1B2+B3+B4B5?

    alexb2 wrote:
    So when I set format for my number as my local currency it's displayed as 123 XXX (XXX is my currency but it's not in latin). I see it's not only displayed but also stored as 123 XXX. That's different from Excel that stores only numbers in cells and shows number with prefix or suffix - Numbers storex number with prefix or suffix.
    No, you get this behavior because the original sheet is displaying values as currencies. I assumes that the import process pass it as a string because he doesn't recognize it as a currency value. As far as I know, Numbers stores the currency entries as a pure number and an indicator of the used currency.
    Here is an example.
    (a) the description of the numerical value (I underlined it: 456)
    <sf:number-cell sf:flags="4" sf:value="456" sf:col="1" sf:row="2">
    <sf:cell-style-ref sfa:IDREF="SFTCellStyle-46"/>
    <sf:content-size sfa:w="58.659881591796875" sfa:h="14"/>
    </sf:number-cell>
    (b) the description of the format (I underlined the used currency: XAM)
    <sf:cell-style sfa:ID="SFTCellStyle-46" sf:cell-style-default-line-height="12" sf:parent-ident="tabular-Basic-body-cell-style-id">
    <sf:property-map>
    <sf:SFTCellStylePropertyNumberFormat>
    <sf:number-format sfa:ID="SFTNumberFormat-23" sf:format-type="1" sf:format-string="#,##0.00 &#xA4;;-#,##0.00 &#xA4;" sf:format-decimal-places="2" sf:format-currency-code="XAM" sf:format-negative-style="0" sf:format-show-thousands-separator="true" sf:format-fraction-accuracy="-3" sf:format-use-accounting-style="false"/>
    </sf:SFTCellStylePropertyNumberFormat>
    <sf:SFTCellStylePropertyImplicitFormatType>
    <sf:number sfa:number="256" sfa:type="i"/>
    </sf:SFTCellStylePropertyImplicitFormatType>
    <sf:SFTCellStylePropertyFormatType>
    <sf:number sfa:number="257" sfa:type="i"/>
    </sf:SFTCellStylePropertyFormatType>
    </sf:property-map>
    </sf:cell-style>
    Of course, if the original currency string is not recognized, it can't be described as such a feature and the value is treated as a simple string.
    So may be at some moment my 123 XXX is treated like string value.
    Yes, find and replace is a nice tool when importing data - thanks for the tip. the last problem is with already Numbers files that were imported not today (or even createde as Numbers file) where some cell becomes string value after some editing.
    Here again, if you edit a currency string and replace it to a not recognized one, the result will be logically a string.
    There is an other way to give this result:
    copy a value from a cell formatted as XAM currency (just an example)
    paste it in a cell whose format is currency Euro (once again it's just an example).
    The result will be a string.
    The culprit is not the program, it's the user.
    I had several times this situation and last time I found error only because I have my budget in 2 programs - in Numbers and in another special budgeting program. As each program has advantages I have in fact 2 instances of the same budget.
    And when I changed some string in Numbers and another program I noticed the sum is different. I was sure it's another program somewhere buggy but noticed than Numbers simply ignores one of the budget strings and sums without it... In fact it was even not the string I changed, I remember I changed the buggy string about a week ago but I haven't compared budgets that time so my budget had a mistake for some time till I noticed it. If I used only Numbers without copy of budget in another program may be even today I won't notice the mistake.
    The same situation happened not once.
    I think that the choice made by Apple for SUM() is correct. You feel that it is wrong. It's useless to debate more, we will not change the behavior of the function.
    I try to give a workaround.
    The neater one is to add columns as I described in my first response.
    The given formula will clearly flag cells which aren't containing numerical values. If you move the SUM from the original range to the new one, the oddities will be flagged automatically.
    Here is an alternate workaround:
    The currency is XAM.
    In B4 I introduced a typo so the value is no longer a numerical one.
    Given that, the sum in the footer doesn't count the 34 (which is the normal behavior).
    In column C1 I entered =1*B
    which flagged the bad cell.
    The alternate is to use an auxiliary table like aux1
    In A1 I entered:
    =IF(ISERROR(INDIRECT(ADDRESS(ROW(),COLUMN(),,,"main"))),"",IF(ISBLANK(INDIRECT(A DDRESS(ROW(),COLUMN(),,,"main"))),"",1*INDIRECT(ADDRESS(ROW(),COLUMN(),,,"main") )))
    Exactly the same formula in B1, C1, D1, …
    So, the table will automatically grab the contents of the main table (just take care to insert more columns in aux1 than in main)
    In the footer row of aux1, insert a sum formula for columns where there is required.
    Looking at this footer will flag columns where a value may be "wrong" so, it will be necessary (but easy) to scan the column's content to find the red triangle(s).
    Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE lundi 13 octobre 2008 13:27:40)

  • Error when using SUM function in Excel template

    I am trying to use the XDO_METADATA to create a sum of a column from my XML data and I am getting the following error in the Template Viewer:
    [111412_104246459][][PROCEDURE] Log Level is changed to PROCEDURE
    [111412_104246553][oracle.xdo.common.xml.XSLTWrapper][ERROR] XSL error:
    Time: 0.125 sec.
    FO Formatting failed.
    <Line 317, Column 116>: XML-23029: (Error) FORG0001: invalid value for cast/constructor
    @Line 317 ==> <Cell Index="2" Style="R7C3" Field="XDO_?SUM_V_CR_MO_IDD1?"><xsl:value-of select="sum(.//G_CR_MST_D/V_CR_MO_IDD)"/>
    when I use:
    XDO_?SUM_V_CR_MO_IDD1?     <?sum(.//G_CR_MST_D/V_CR_MO_IDD)?>
    or
    [111412_104048508][][PROCEDURE] Log Level is changed to PROCEDURE
    [111412_104048554][oracle.xdo.common.xml.XSLTWrapper][ERROR] XSL error:
    Time: 0.078 sec.
    FO Formatting failed.
    <Line 317, Column 105>: XML-23029: (Error) FORG0001: invalid value for cast/constructor
    @Line 317 ==> <Cell Index="2" Style="R7C3" Field="XDO_?SUM_V_CR_MO_IDD1?"><xsl:value-of select="sum(.//V_CR_MO_IDD)"/>
    when I use:
    XDO_?SUM_V_CR_MO_IDD1?     <?sum(.//V_CR_MO_IDD)?>
    I believe the XSL to be correct because when I change it to a count it works and when I go into BI Publisher 11g and create the query in the data model and then create a summary from it, the summary is created.
    Can anyone help?

    I went back to basics and created reports (via EXCEL templates) like I was asking based on good old EMP and DEPT and I found exactly the same problems I was mentioning. I looked at the templates provided but they were not calculating totals, like me they were selecting them and then just displaying them on the page.
    Anyway, I have narrowed it down to the fact that when you do aggregates like sum(.//SAL) this works if you have a salary for every value. I did an outer join with DEPT so I did have empty rows and why I still experienced the problems.
    Basically XSL does not like adding (including using the sum function) values that effectively have nulls in them which is why I get the cast/constructor errors because it is trying to turn a NaN value to a number and does not (or cannot) do it.
    You need to either have a value in every row of your column (maybe possible by selecting nvl in your query) and make sure that you check the "create empty nodes" checkbox in the data model of BI Publisher.,
    the other solution is an xsl solution where you would have to make sure that you only added non null values and for that you would have to investigate xsl blogs.
    It is, by the way, why my count worked because it is just counting that the record exists it does not care what the element content is or isn't.
    Closing thread.

  • Issues using SUM Function in query

    I have pasted two queries Query1 (calculating counts for total_ships and ships_released) and Query2 (calculating the two same counts and then calculating SUM for total_shipments and I am having problem in this)
    Query 1:
    select  b.loc , b.week, b.vvalue2, b.Total_ships, nvl(a.up_date,'None') as datee , nvl( a.ships_rel_total,0) as Total_released
    from (
          SELECT l.loc  , sr1.vvalue1 as Week, sr.vvalue2 , to_char(ss.udate, 'YYYY-MM-DD') as up_date ,  count(distinct s.ship_id ) as ships_rel_total
          FROM ship s, loct l,
             ship_num sr1,  ship_num sr, ship_stat ss, ship_stat ss1
          WHERE ......
          Group by l.loc , sr1.vvalue1, sr.vvalue2 , to_char(ss.udate, 'YYYY-MM-DD')
          ) A,
    ( SELECT distinct l.loc  , sr1.vvalue1 as Week, sr.vvalue2 , count(s.ship_id ) as Total_Ships
          FROM ship s, loct l,
              ship_num sr1,  ship_num sr, ship_stat ss, ship_stat ss1
          WHERE ......
          Group by c.loc , c.week , c.vvalue2  ) B
    where a.loc (+) = b.loc
    and a.vvalue2  (+) = b.vvalue2
    order by b.loc, b.week , b.vvalue2,a.up_date; Query 1 Output:
    *OUTPUT*
    LOC         WEEK          VALUE2        TOTAL_SHIPS       DATEE         TOtAL_SHIPS_RELEASED
    AA          111              BB              12                  10-05-12            2
    AA          111              BB              12                  11-05-12            4
    AA          111              CC              2                    14-05-12            1Then I added sum function for total_ships and its not giving me result what I need :(
    Query 2:
    select  b.loc , b.week, b.vvalue2, b.sum_ships, nvl(a.up_date,'None') as datee , nvl( a.ships_rel_total,0) as Total_released
    from (
          SELECT l.loc  , sr1.vvalue1 as Week, sr.vvalue2 , to_char(ss.udate, 'YYYY-MM-DD') as up_date ,  count(distinct s.ship_id ) as ships_rel_total
          FROM ship s, loct l,
             ship_num sr1,  ship_num sr, ship_stat ss, ship_stat ss1
          WHERE ......
          Group by l.loc , sr1.vvalue1, sr.vvalue2 , to_char(ss.udate, 'YYYY-MM-DD')
    ) A,
    ( Select  c.loc, c.week , c.vvalue2 ,  sum(c.total_ships) sum_ships 
    from
        ( SELECT distinct l.loc  , sr1.vvalue1 as Week, sr.vvalue2 , count(s.ship_id ) as Total_Ships
          FROM ship s, loct l,
              ship_num sr1,  ship_num sr, ship_stat ss, ship_stat ss1
          WHERE ......
          Group by l.loc , sr1.vvalue1 , sr.vvalue2  ) C
    Group by c.loc , c.week , c.vvalue2  ) B
    where a.loc (+) = b.loc
    and a.vvalue2  (+) = b.vvalue2
    order by b.loc, b.week , b.vvalue2,a.up_date;  my query is giving me this :(
    Query 2 Output:
    LOC         WEEK          VALUE2        *SUM_SHIPS*       DATEE         TOtAL_SHIPS_RELEASED
    AA          111                BB              26                 10-05-12            2
    AA          111                BB              26                 11-05-12            4
    AA          111                CC              26                 14-05-12            1
    But I need a result like this:
    LOC         WEEK          VALUE2        SUM_SHIPS       DATEE         TOtAL_SHIPS_RELEASED
    AA          111                BB              14              10-05-12            2
    AA          111                BB              14              11-05-12            4
    AA          111                CC              14              14-05-12            1

    Hi,
    It sounds like you have a Fan Trap , where a one-to-many relationship is causing some items to be counted many times.
    The usual solution is to compute the aggregates before doing the one-to-many join. Analytic functions may make this simpler.
    Sorry, I can't show you exactly how to do it without the exact data.
    Post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for all tables involved, and also post the results you want from that data (if different from what you've already posted).
    Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
    Simplify the problem as much as possible. If the problem only concerns the total_ships column, then only post the data needed to compute total_ships. This includes all the columns involved in the joins and GROUP BY clauses.
    Always say which version of Oracle you're using (e.g., 11.2.0.2.0).
    See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}

  • Documentation about this function module

    ineed Documentation about this function module RP_ANSAL_FROM_PERNR

    Hi Avinash,
    Have a look at the function group program documentation.It gives an idea of what the function module does.
    Short text
    Annual Salary Functionality (ANSAL)
    Description
    This function group contains different functionality for calculating the annual salary, and calculating a period salary from the annual salary.
    The function group evaluates different tables and features:
    Tables
    T503      defines whether an employee is paid on an
              hourly basis or per period
    T510W     defines the time unit
    T511      determines the relevant module from the annual
              salary wage type, rounding, etc.
    T539J     defines the valid wage types for calculating 
              the annual salary
    Features
    ANSAL     defines the annual salary wage type
    PFREQ     number of periods per year
    Old U510F -> use T510F ?
    Thanks
    Lakshman

  • How can I sum up raws? the sum function seems to work for columns only and right now I have to create a separate formula for each raw

    How can I sum up raws? the Sum function seems to work only on columns. Right now I have to create a separate formula for each raw

    Hi dah,
    "Thanks, but can I do one formula for all present and future raws? as raws are being added, I have to do the sum function again and again"
    You do need a separate formula for each group of values to be summed.
    If the values are in columns, you need a copy of the formula for each column.
    If the values are in rows, you need a copy of the formula for for each row.
    If you set up your formulas as SGIII did in his example (shown below), where every non-header row has the same formula, Numbers will automtically add the formula to new rows as you add them.
    "Same formula" in this context means exactly the same as all the formulas above, with one exception: the row reference in each formula is incremented (by Numbers) to match the row containing the formula.
    Here the formula looks like this in the three rows shown.
    B2: =SUM(2)
    B3: =SUM(3)
    B4: =SUM(4)
    That pattern will continue as rows are added to the table.
    Also, because the row token (2) references all of the non-header cells in row 2, the formula will automatically include new columns as they are added to the table.
    Regards,
    Barry

  • How to correct XML Output in Cross Tab Template for sum function?

    I have designed a Cross Tab Template to summarize R12 Account Analysis data by Period by Party_name. The template is doing what I want it to do with the exception of amount. I have a function in the sum(accounted_net) field and it will only display 0.00 even though I know there are actual amount. Can someone help in looking at my template to see what I have done wrong?
    Here is the sum funciton.
    <?if:count(current-group()[CCID_SOURCE=$ABC])?><?sum(current-group()[CCID_SOURCE=$ABC]/ACCOUNTED_NET)?> <?end if?>
    CCID_SOURCE is an element I created in XML to concatnate CCID and Party_name for grouping. $ABC is a variable that I defined for "CCID_SOURCE" to check if there is null value for a specific ccid_party. If it's null, it won't do the sum function, otherwise it will sum the accounted_net for the period_name, party_name.
    Thank you for your help.
    Stacey

    Figured this out on our own

  • Sum() function not working properly. Instead of summing, its showing total count of the rows

    We have migrated one application from .net framework 1.0 to .net framework  2 (from Visual studio 2003 to Visual STUDIO 2005). Now after migration we are facing some problem related to the sum function in Crystal report 10. It is not working properly.
    So we migrated to Crystal report XI release 2 (though still using evaluation version for testing purpose), the problem is not yet resolved.
    The problem we are facing is while using the summary in the group field, it is showing the number of rows instead of the sum of the values.
    We have checked the same with min-max functions, and it is working properly with those.
    We have tried to make the sum by formula field. In such case, it is not showing any syntactical error but at execution time, it is throwing an error saying "A number field or currency amount field is required here".
    In the  the report the datatype of the field on which we are applying the sum function, is number, and in the table from where the data is fetched, the datatype is numeric(9,6).
    Any idea why sum function is not working ?
    I was browsing the net and saw running totals can be a work around for such summation issues in Crystal Report XI.
    Can you please provide insight of how to implement running totals for summation purpose in solving such issues.

    Hi,
    Running totals are more accurate than Summary Totals in Crystal.  Why? ...ask Crystal.  Anyway, just right click on Running Totals, create a new one, and enter you fields, etc. For group totals, it gives you a place to reset the totals for each group, etc.  Pretty self explainatory. 
    Jim

  • COUNT() and SUM() function it not working in XDO file.

    Hi ,
    I am getting one error. Count and sum function not working proper.
    For example :
    Department 10 have 3 employee and total salary is 8750. But my report returning total employee 1 and total salary 5000
    10
    Ename Sal
    KING 5000
    CLARK 2450
    MILLER 1300
    ==================
    total employee : 1
    total salary : 5000
    Kindly help me solve this problem.
    <dataTemplate name="TEXT">
    <properties>
    <property value="upper" name="xml_tag_case" />
    </properties>
    <lexicals>
    </lexicals>
    <dataQuery>
    <sqlstatement name="Q_TEMP">
    <![CDATA[SELECT DEPTNO,DNAME,LOC FROM DEPT]]>
    </sqlstatement>
    <sqlstatement name="Q_TEMP1">
    <![CDATA[SELECT ENAME,HIREDATE,SAL FROM EMP WHERE DEPTNO = :DEPTNO]]>
    </sqlstatement>
    </dataQuery>
    <datastructure>
    <GROUP name="G_1" source="Q_TEMP">
    <element value="DEPTNO" name="DEPTNO" />
    <element value="DNAME" name="DNAME" />
    <element value="LOC" name="LOC" />
    <GROUP name="G_2" source="Q_TEMP1">
    <element value="ENAME" name="ENAME" />
    <element value="SAL" name="SAL" />
    <element value="G_2.ENAME" name="TOTL_DETAILS" dataType="number" function="COUNT()" />
    <element value="G_2.SAL" name="TOTL_SAL" function="SUM()"/>
    </GROUP>
    </GROUP>
    </datastructure>
    </dataTemplate>
    Thanks
    Yudhi

    Please have the data structure as below:
    <datastructure>
    <GROUP name="G_1" source="Q_TEMP">
    <element value="DEPTNO" name="DEPTNO" />
    <element value="DNAME" name="DNAME" />
    <element value="LOC" name="LOC" />
    <GROUP name="G_2" source="Q_TEMP1">
    <element value="ENAME" name="ENAME" />
    <element value="SAL" name="SAL" />
    *</GROUP>*
    *<element value="G_2.ENAME" name="TOTL_DETAILS" dataType="number" function="COUNT()" />*
    *<element value="G_2.SAL" name="TOTL_SAL" function="SUM()"/>*
    *</GROUP>*
    </datastructure>
    Aggregate functions to be placed at the level you require it. Here you need at G_1, so place it there.

  • SUM function issue

    Hi everyone,
    I have a problem with SUM function in SQL query on Oracle 11g database. Maybe you will be able to help me.
    Problem:
    I want to shows summary costs for shipments separately for each service provider and for each month they did the shipments.
    Data is stored in SHIPMENT AND SHIPMENT_COST table as shown below. The problem is that summary function I use sums base costs (marked as B in SHIPMENT_COST table) for each accessorial cost (marked as A in SHIPMENT_COST table). In example for shipment 10005031 we have 4 accessorial costs so it shows 6120 in BASE_COST column. I tried to use distinct in summary but then we have a problem with shipment id 201307133713_0383 which has 3 base costs equal to 221.54 so with distinct it will show 221.54 instead of 221.54x3.
    SHIPMENT table:
    START_TIME               SHIPMENT_GID               SERVPROV_GID
    2013-06-25                    10005031                         T222176
    2013-06-15                    201307133713_0383          T76180
    SHIPMENT_COST table:
    SHIPMENT_GID                        COST                                       COST_TYPE
    10005031                                 1530                                        B
    10005031                                  30.6                                        A
    10005031                                  120                                         A
    10005031                                  400                                         A
    10005031                                  100                                         A
    201307133713_0383                   221.54                                    B
    201307133713_0383                   221.54                                    B
    201307133713_0383                   221.54                                    B
    RESULT table:
    SHIPMENT_START_DATE
    SERVPROV
    BASE_COST
    CLAIM_COST
    06/2013
    T76180
    664.62
    null
    06/2013
    T222176
    6120
    650.6
    Query:
    SELECT DISTINCT TO_CHAR(SH.START_TIME,'MM/YYYY') AS SHIPMENT_START_DATE,
            SH.SERVPROV_GID AS SERVPROV,
            SUM(SHCOST.COST) AS BASE_COST,
            SUM(SHCOST_CLAIM.COST) AS CLAIM_COST
    FROM    SHIPMENT SH,
            SHIPMENT SHC
            LEFT OUTER JOIN SHIPMENT_COST SHCOST ON (SHC.SHIPMENT_GID = SHCOST.SHIPMENT_GID AND SHCOST.COST_TYPE = 'B'),
            SHIPMENT SHC_CLAIM
            LEFT OUTER JOIN SHIPMENT_COST SHCOST_CLAIM ON (SHC_CLAIM.SHIPMENT_GID = SHCOST_CLAIM.SHIPMENT_GID AND SHCOST_CLAIM.COST_TYPE = 'A')
    WHERE 1=1
            AND SHC.SHIPMENT_GID = SH.SHIPMENT_GID
            AND SHC_CLAIM.SHIPMENT_GID = SH.SHIPMENT_GID
            AND    SH.SHIPMENT_GID IN ('10005031','201307133713_0383')
            GROUP BY TO_CHAR(SH.START_TIME,'MM/YYYY'),
            SH.SERVPROV_GID
    Best Regards,
    Łukasz

    with SHIPMENT (START_TIME,SHIPMENT_GID,SERVPROV_GID) as
    select to_date('2013-06-25','yyyy-mm-dd'),'10005031','T222176' from dual union all
    select to_date('2013-06-15','yyyy-mm-dd'),'201307133713_0383','T76180' from dual
    SHIPMENT_COST(SHIPMENT_GID,COST,COST_TYPE)
    as
    select '10005031','1530','B' from dual union all
    select '10005031','30.6','A' from dual union all
    select '10005031','120','A' from dual union all
    select '10005031','400','A' from dual union all
    select '10005031','100','A' from dual union all
    select '201307133713_0383','221.54','B' from dual union all
    select '201307133713_0383','221.54','B' from dual union all
    select '201307133713_0383','221.54','B' from dual
    select *
      from (select to_char(t.START_TIME, 'mm/yyyy'),
                   t.SERVPROV_GID,
                   c.COST,
                   c.COST_TYPE
              from SHIPMENT t
              join SHIPMENT_COST c
                on t.SHIPMENT_GID = c.SHIPMENT_GID)
    pivot(sum(COST) for COST_TYPE in('A' CLAIM_COST,'B' BASE_COST))
    TO_CHAR(T.START_TIME,'MM/YYYY'
    SERVPROV_GID
    CLAIM_COST
    BASE_COST
    06/2013
    T76180
    664.62
    06/2013
    T222176
    650.6
    1530
    Ramin Hashimzade

  • Reg: sum() function in XML

    HI frs,
    while using sum function in Xml.not getting correct output.
    for ex:
    i have created report with emp table.
    load the xml into MS-Word.
    i want to sum total of salary of employees.
    i used SUM() function to calculate but in output it adds twice the first value and adds the rest
    for ex :
    these are values
    200
    300
    500
    i am gettting total like 1200 actually it should be 1000.
    it adds like 200+200+300+500
    why is it so.
    Regards
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    I have a problem with the 'l_booklist', I declare it as 'l_booklist  TYPE REF TO if_ixml_node' like in the interface but a shortdump comes up. must it be filled?
    greets
    Thomas

  • Help with SUM function ??

    Hi,
    I am trying to build a SUM function into the following SELECT statement;
    SELECT   emp_code "EmployeeCode", trn_date "TransactionDate", project "ProjectCode",
    phase_code "PhaseCode", task_code "TaskCode", reg_hrs "RegularHoursAmt", rate_reg "RegularHoursRate", ot_hrs "OvertimeHoursAmt", rate_ot "OvertimeHoursRate"
    Currently when i do the extract to xls I manually compile the "RegularHoursAmt" and "RegularHoursRate" manually and it's quite a task. I'm sure it can be completed in teh SELECT but I'm not clear on how and it's been quite some time since my last foray into SQL. Any assistance appreciated.
    I need to sum "RegularHoursAmt" and "RegularHoursRate"
    per "EmployeeCode"
    by "TransactionDate"
    with unique combo of "ProjectCode", "PhaseCode", "TaskCode"
    Cheers, Peter

    Hi, Peter,
    PJS5 wrote:
    Thanks Frank for the quick response. Ok, here goes;
    The TABLES already exist and I am only pulling the data for the columns in my SELECT statement so no CREATE of INSERT as such.Post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements so that the people who want to help you can re-create the problem and test their ideas.
    The data is in Oracle 10g 10.1.0.2.0Perfect!
    So you want totals that represent the entire day for a given employee.
    Yes, but rows are by the unique combo per employee of "ProjectCode", "PhaseCode", "TaskCode"So a row of output will represent a distinct combination of employee, day, ProjectCode, PhaseCode and TaskCode, and that one output row may correspond to more than one row of input; is that right?
    eg Tom works on 4 unique "ProjectCode/PhaseCode/TaskCode" efforts on "TransactionDate"What does "effort" mean here? If I could look at some actaul data (or actual fake data; don't post anything like real credit card numbers) and the results you want from that data, perhaps it would be clear.
    One of those unique "ProjectCode/PhaseCode/TaskCode" efforts however has 3 timesheet entries as he has added unique Descriptions of what his efforts were aimed at achieving.
    We are not extracting the Descriptions and thereby want to SUM those 3 timesheet entries into one row.
    Do you also want a total for each employee, over all days? No thanks
    Do you want a grand total for all employees and all days? No thanks
    Do you want the totals on the same output rows as your current reuslts? That would be handy
    If so, use the analytic SUM function. I'm not familiar with this
    Do you want separate rows for the the totals? That could helpPost the exact results you want from a small set of given data. It's fine to describe the results, as you did above, but describe them in addition to (not instead of) actually showing them.
    Does that make my questions easier to follow?It looks good, but without some sample data and the results you want from that data, I can't say for sure.
    Please post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements (relevant columns only) for a little sample data, so that I (and the others who want to help you) can see exactly what your tables are like, and actually try our solutions. Simplify as much as possible. For example, if the data is actually coming from a multi-table join, but you already know how to join all the tables perfectly, then pretend all the data is in one table, and post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for that one table that looks sort of like your current result set. Post just enough data to show what you want to do. Based on what you've said so far, I'm guessing that 10 to 20 rows of raw data, resulting in 3 to 7 rows of output could give a nice example.
    Also, post the exact results you want from the sample data you post. Explain, with specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
    If parts of your desired output are optional (that is, if some parts "would be handy" or "could help") then post a couple of different sets of results from the same data, and explain, something like this:
    "What I'd really love to get for results is" ...
    but, if that makes things really complicated or inefficient, I don't absolutely need ... or ...,
    so I'd settle for these results: ..."
    I know it's a lot of work to post all this information, but it's really necessary. If I could help you without making you do all this, then I would. Unfortunately, I really don't have a good idea of where you're coming from or where you want to go.
    Edited by: Frank Kulash on Oct 19, 2010 8:01 PM

  • Problem with group by and sum function

    In one of the report I'm using grioup by clause on one column. However when I use this function the sum function on other column is not working.
    Any idea how we can resolve this?

    Hi Tintin,
    Follow the below steps:
    1) On the order number column formula, use the max function.
    2) Duplicate the revenue column in the RPD, set the aggregation to sum and level to transaction. This will give you the sum of all the orders in a particular trasaction, where as in report you will see only the max account number.
    Assign points if helpful.
    Thanks,
    -Amith.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Does Acrobat X (Pro) work properly in OS 10.9 Mavericks?

    Does anyone know if Acrobat X (Pro) works properly in 10.9 Mavericks? Acrobat 9 Pro does not work all that smoothly, and has the sidebar issue. I am thinking of upgrading the whole Creative Suite from CS5 to CS6, but it doesn't make sense if I will s

  • Final Cut Studio - Adding Transitions

    First off, I'm really new to Final Cut Pro... but very experienced in most other pro level Photo and Vector software. I'm following a video tutorial to learn the software, but I keep getting the "Dropped Frames" Error when I add effects. The way I'm

  • Just got home with my new MACBOOK!!!

    I am very excited to get my first Mac! (ds has a g4) I said several prayers over my Macbook box that I did not just purchase a lemon. It is a week 36 so I hope it is o.k. I am glad I waited until the new iPods came out too. I am eligible for the educ

  • Yosemite place psd or tif images in Illustrator CS4.

    I have just upgraded to Yosemite and cannot place psd or tif images to Illustrator CS4. I need a high resolution image with a transparent background for print. Surely there is a fix for this.

  • How can use Chrome System in Flash Builder

    i have a problem with flash builder (Gumbo). in fact i can't use system chrome in flash builder beta.(after changing .xml file) please help me