About the file size of Default.png

Hallo forum members,
Is there a 2 MB restriction on [email protected]  as there is on normal JPEG pictures?
When I save the [email protected] for a widget the filesize goes up to more than 2 MB, as I save the png with 24 Bit.
Using 8 bit depth to save file size the images show artefacts and color banding.
Ulrike

Book Cover Art
● The book’s cover art that appears on the iBooks Store (also known as the marketing image) is the image
delivered alongside the book asset and does not refer to the cover image included in the book asset. The
pixel limit for the interior cover, as with all interior book images, has been increased to 3.2 million pixels.
● The book’s cover art must use RGB color mode and should be at least 1400 pixels along the shorter axis.
For best results, a good rule of thumb is to use an image that is a minimum of 300 dpi.
● The book’s cover art file must be a high-quality JPEG with .jpg or .jpeg extension or PNG with .png
extension.
● The 3.2 million pixel limit on interior book images does not apply to the external cover/marketing image
that is sent alongside the book asset.
● It is important that you do not increase the size of a smaller image to meet the minimum image size
dimension standard. Excessively blurry or pixelated images will be rejected.
Screenshots
You can provide up to five screenshots per book.
● Full-sized iPad 1/2 images (1024 x 768 or 768 x 1024) in PNG (.png) or JPEG (.jpg) format.
● Full-sized new iPad images (2048 x 1536 or 1536 x 2048) in PNG (.png) or JPEG (.jpg) format.
● For a cleaner look, you can optionally remove the status bar (making the images 1004 x 768 or 748 x 1024
for iPad 1/2, or 2028 x 1536 or 1536 x 2028 for the new iPad).
Perhaps the engineers should take time to read  the Assett guide.  As yet I have not found any engineers posts  advising other than the assett guuide.. do you have a link for any?
Its always better to have higher resolution images  than not, and as long as the end product comes with the 3.2 meg limit for all except the cover, its good for those not over familar with image ediiting.
The iPad retina screen resolution is 2048 x 1536 @164 DPI/PPI

Similar Messages

  • I have Premier Elements 8.  I recorded some 45 minute lectures on a Sony Camcorder at 17 Mbps.  The resulting, edited file size is about 6.3 GB -- too big to record on a 4.7 GB DVD-R disc.  Using Adobe PE 8, can the file size be reduced in some way to end

    I have Premier Elements 8.  I recorded some 45 minute lectures on a Sony Camcorder at 17 Mbps.  The resulting, edited file size is about 6.3 GB -- too big to record on a 4.7 GB DVD-R disc.  Using Adobe PE 8, can the file size be reduced in some way to end up less than 4.7 GB (I realize image quality may be less htan the original)?

    pault
    What are you going for....DVD-VIDEO Widescreen on DVD disc or AVCHD format on DVD disc?
    Are you doing your burn to disc with a check mark next to "Fit Content To Available Space" in the burn dialog?
    When you have the DVD 4.7 GB/120 min in the burner tray and are in the burn dialog ready to hit Burn, what does the burn dialog quality area show for Space Require and Bitrate with and without the check mark next to "Fit Content To Available Space"?
    Just in case mention....the DVD disc with the 4.7 GB/120 min in reality is 4.38 GB.
    The goal is to find out if you are overlooking the "Fit Content To Available Space" option in the burn dialog. Depending on the circumstances to be defined, use of that option does not necessarily mean a compromise in the end product quality.
    Let us start here and then move forward based on the details of your reply.
    Thank you.
    ATR

  • Save For Web vs. Resizing vs. File Size vs. PNG

    In playing around with some settings while saving a .png file, I noticed some weird results. For this example, the original image is 300 x 300, but I want the final size to be 200 x 200. I get different results depending on the order I perform the following operations (I never thought the order mattered until now).
    1. start with 300 x 300 image, choose save for web, select png-24, with transparency, white matte, convert to sRGB, change image size to 200 x 200, then save - the file size is 37kb
    2. start with 300 x 300 image, use Photoshop's "image size" to change to 200 x 200, then save for web, etc - the file size is 111kb
    So depending on which step I resize the image, the file size is significantly different - if I resize BEFORE using save for web, the file size is much larger. This is just weird to me, but I always resize AFTER choosing save for web, so that's why I've never caught this until now. In case you ask, while using Photoshop's "image size", all three options are checked at the bottom of that window, so nothing is getting re-sampled or anything like that.
    The only thing I can think of is each of those methods treat pixel data differently when reducing the dimensions. When I overlay both exported .png files on top of each other, I see no difference in pixel quality and/or color shift - so why the big difference in file size? Unsurprisingly, if I just save the file straight to .png, the sharpness is much better, and the file size is 46kb. I did notice when saving for web, the colors become a little more saturated.
    Are all these results typical? I've never really paid much attention to the results when exporting .png's. I always thought the results were lossless (in general).

    Too many variables
    What? There are 2 variables here (variables = scenarios = steps). Only two different operations.
    1. resize the image, THEN use "save for web" = 91kb
    2."save for web", THEN change image size = 157kb
    Hopefully my logic translates here:
    All other settings are the same. I even made sure the .psd was sRGB this time. The specific question was "why does the different workflow order produce such a big difference in file size"?
    In creating a new test file (http://www.shan-dysigns.com/userForums/photoshop/savePNG.zip), I did notice an interesting thing: (I'm including my files in case you want to follow along or test for yourself)
    If I merge all layers BEFORE performing the steps above, the file sizes were relatively closer to one another - 168kb and 157kb (respectively from the 1, 2 list above)
    One thing to note is all the .psd layers are either shapes or text - this whole scenario may be totally different if each layer had rasterized content (actually, it does, by about -20kb).
    The file size in step 1 above didn't jump until it had to consider rastered text/shapes into the calculation. So all this tells me the difference in file size has to do with how each process handles vector data. Maybe when you allow PS to resize the image first, the overall file size is smaller because the vector data gets recalculated???
    I don't know how to properly interpret all these differences, but I do know there is something about PS's operation of resizing the canvas with vector data versus resizing the canvas with rasterized data - this has to be where the difference in file size lies.
    Maybe I've just wasted a bunch of time on the obvious, but I think I learned something here. Now my head hurts and my eyes have popped out of my head.
    So, Chris, I guess there ARE more variables in this situation. My curse is being nosey and wanting to know more technically about PS than most casual designers probably would care about.

  • How can I minimise the file size of a greyscale image ?

    Hi,
    What methods are there for making as small as possible the file size of a greyscale image. I need to keep the resolution at 200pixels per inch. The image is going to be big, 5835mm wide and 1780mm tall ! Some of them have some fine soft detail so I need to keep an eye on how that degrades. Others are better.
    Can the same work for colour images or are there different approaches for those ?
    Thanks
    Envirographics

    My need is to enlarge up a plan for placement in, then tracing over in a CAD program, retaining the fine detail prior to tracing. I have some at 1/10th the full size item at 200ppi, others still as digital slr raw files. I have found that less than 200ppi the detail starts to go. considering this, if I am now working full size item surely I would need 200ppi also ? I could try simply enlarging it up 'as is' but would imagine when I am zoomed in that the ability to work closer in would be lost as I would be seeing great big pixels. Certainly taking an image currently raw and making it 200ppi and 5800 wide would give me better detail retention.
    I had hoped for some suggestions on how to save at lesser colour or grey numbers than 256. Some scanning of large plans can for storage purposes use 17 colours for example. Do I need 256 shades of grey, can I save as 64 shades perhaps ? Certainly LZW is the right direction here, retaining detail but using compression. JPG compression starts to frogspawn the edges below quality 6, so losing detail again. What about png or gif, thats what I had hoped for. Does anyone know how to reduce colour palette numbers to 64 or 32 shades ?
    Envirographics

  • Preview: Save as PDF while approximately keeping the file size ?

    Hello!
    I know that several good discussions took place about the way to reduce the file size when saving (as) a PDF from the application Preview.
    I tried:
    • the default poor quality "Reduce File Size" preset filter,
    • the additional filters provided by Jérôme Colas (http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6250289)
    • the "Compress PDF Workflow 4.0" that reenables feature for Leopard (http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/automator/compresspdfworkflow.html)
    Has anyone come across a method to _keep in about the *original size*_ of the original Adobe PDF ?
    When saving a 3 MB PDF with Preview, I see it increase to 80 MB, so that dramatically reducing it to 40MB is not really satisfying, is it?
    Thank you in advance for any suggestion !

    Bernd, thank you for your attempt to help but the option dialog windows do not contain the same options.  There are numerous other posts on this forum about this issue and there is no answer.  Clearly, there is an issue.  I have submitted this issue to our internal help desk.

  • How can I reduce the file size when PDF Optimizer does not do much?

    I have a PDF form that exists of 48 pages. 44 pages are forms / have form fields, the other 4 are just informative. Each form-page has approx. 80 fields (checkboxes, text fields).
    When I started setting up the PDF form the file size was 12 MB and I had placed fields on 21 pages. Then with 34 pages the file size was 19 MB. And with 40 pages it was 35 MB big! Finally with 44 pages the file size is 34 MB.
    So I searched with Google and found some tips. Using the "PDF Optimizer" option inside Acrobat for example. So I did, and the file was reduced only with 3 MB... 31 MB was the file. Also used the option "Save as.... Optimized".... no difference. I also found a suggestion about removing embedded fonts. Using the "Audit Space Usage" option I noticed the fonts taking many MegaBytes:
    * Content Streams: 5.287.000     15,09 %
    * Fonts:                24.556.810     70,08 %  !!
    * Acrobat forms:      3.349.164    12,05 %
    In the older PDF version (I saved and kept this one too) with just 21 pages with form-fields, the  "Audit Space Usage" shows:
    * Content Streams: 5.292.000     40,14 %
    * Fonts:                 1.290.224     9,79 %
    * Acrobat forms:      1.588.758    12,05 %
    So I could save many many MegaBytes by -UnEmbedding- fonts. But if I do this (unembed ALL fonts), the file size stays almost the same!?!?!? Why? What can I do to reduce the file size? I would like it to be 8 MB if possible (32 MB -  24 MB = 8 MB)?
    Thank you for your help!

    If you have authored the form, reduce the number of different fonts for the content and form fields.
    Any font used in a form field will cause that font to be embedded into the PDF.
    If you are going to Optimize the PDF be very careful with forms. Optimization does a lot of removal of items and rearranging of items which can really mess up forms.

  • How can i find out the file size of a Keynote on an iPad please?

    How can i find out the file size of a Keynote on an iPad please?

    I think a rule of thumb is what you're looking for.
    Full bandwidth CD audio (AIFF): about 10 MB/min
    Apple Lossless: about 5 MB/min
    MP3 @ 256k: about 2 MB/min
    MP3 @ 128k: about 1 MB/min
    Of course the MP3 file size is exactly linear with bit rate.
    As for sound quality:
    Apple Lossless is, as the name says, lossless.
    MP3 @128k: fine for listening in the car or the kitchen etc. If you have an audiophile sound system, this will remind you why you spent all that money.
    MP3 @256K: barely distinguishable from CD on very good equipment.
    MP3 @320K: probably not distinguishable from CD.
    I presume that since you're talking about importing classical CDs these are ones you own. Remember you can always do it again if you need higher fidelity or if better technology comes out. I import most CDs at 128k, since most of my MP3 listening is in the car, or walking, or as background. And I can always play the CD if I want to sit and listen.
    The logic for purchased music is totally different -- you probably won't get to upgrade that without buying it some different way. So buying 128k MP3s (or AACs) is something you'll probably regret later. Buying 256k MP3s is a lot less problematic.

  • I am trying to make a pdf of a file and I need to get the file size to be no bigger than 10MB. What is the best way to do this

    I am trying to make a pdf of a file and I need to get the file size to be no bigger than 10MB. Even when I save it, the image quality at minimum the file size is 10.9 MB. What is the best way to do this

    @Barbara – What purpose is that PDF for? Print? Web?
    If web purpose, you could convert CMYK images to sRGB. That would reduce the file size as well.
    A final resort to bring down file size is:
    1. Print to PostScript
    2. Distill to PDF
    That would bring file size down even more. About 20%, depending on the images and other contents you are using, compared with the Acrobat Pro method. If you like you could send me a personal message, so we could exchange mail addresses. I could test for you. Just provide the highres PDF without any downsampling and transparency intact. Best provide a PDF/X-4.
    I will place the PDF in InDesign, print to PostScript, distill to PDF.
    Uwe

  • I'm no longer able to select the file size when emailing a photo. How can I solve this? iPhone 4S with iOS 7.1.1

    I'm no longer able to select the file size when emailing a photo. How can I solve this? iPhone 4S with iOS 7.1.1. Thanks a lot.

    Yeah - I tried that, several times; each time I get "iTunes is restoring the software on this iPhone" and after about 30 minutes the screen on the phone lights up again with the same screen I had before.  After that ... nothing.

  • How do I reduce the file size of my pictures

    I am running out of space on my hard drive and notice that my iphoto library contains over 5000 pictures and is about 15GB.  This is about 3MB per picture.  I checked and lots are over 10MB.  Most pictures I only print in 10x15, the largest i ever printed was A4 sized. I guess i don't need to keep such large files.  These cameras are now set to make pictures with too many pixels I guess...
    does anyone know of a way to reduce the size of all my picture files?
    thanks
    p

    1. Reducing the file sizes of your pictures will not just reduce their quality when you print, it wll also negatively affect their quality no matter how you view them. Remember the screen quality on your next mac will be better than this one, and even more so on the one after.
    2. The simplest solution to a size issue is to store the Library on an external disk, You can do this with iTunes and iMovie too.
    3. If you really want to reduce the quality of your photos then there is no way to do that in iPhoto. Here's what you'd have to do:
    Export the Pics from iPhoto (File -> Export) and in the Export dialogue make your choices on Jpeg Quality (the amount of compression used) and size (the dimensions)
    Delete the pics from iPhoto
    Import the ones who have exported back to iPhoto.
    Give away your camera and get a lower quality one
    Regards
    TD

  • How to minimize the file size of a file with drawing markups

    Scenario:
    I need to turn a sample of a report into a report template, so I am deleting as many objects as I can with the Tools>Content>Edit Object.  For text that I cannot delete that way, I am covering it up with a white box (Comment>Drawing Markups>square and setting outline = white and fill = white).  On this particular PDF, there are about 20 of these white boxes.  I'm then using Preflight>Flatten annotations and form fields to flatten all of the markups.
    Problem:
    Unfortunately, even after using Preflight and Save As>Reduced Size PDF, the file size is still over 900 kb.  The original file size before I make any changes is less than 150 kb.  I need the final file size to be 200-300 kb.
    Settings:
    Windows 7
    Adobe Acrobat X Pro
    Solutions?
    I may be going about this all wrong, so any advice you have is much appreciated!  The only other thing I can think of to do (since I can't get a blank sample report), is to recreate the report in Word and then PDF it.  I'm hoping there's a better solution.  I tried Photoshop first and the file sizes were in the MBs, so I switched to Acrobat.  Maybe a different program would work even better?

    Basically that is what Bill is telling you. The best method is to:
    create the design of the form in Word.
    Save as a PDF (on a Mac the best method is to go to print menu click pdf and hold mouse or track pad button down, and Chose Adobe PDF) .
    Then open PDF in Acrobat
    Click on Tools
    Click on Forms and create form. Either letting acrobat create the fields and add or take away fields as need.  Or create fields manually.
    This way should you need to make correction you can open the original Word Document, Make chages save as PDF The in open original in PDF. Click on Tools > Pages and choose replace pages and replace desired page(s) as needed. Then readjust fields if needed or add or take fields as needed.

  • How can I keep the file size small when I render a .mov file to video in PS entended CS4?

    Hi,
    I haven't worked with video in Photoshop before and I am having the following issue:
    I imported a .mov file into photoshop. I trimmed the file by moving the start and finish points to the relevant points on the timeline. I then cropped the image to get rid of unwanted footage on the edge of the screen. I then selected export - render video. On the panel I chose to select only "currently selected frames" as the range and I chose "Quick Time Movie" as the file type. When I check the properties of my newly rendered movie the file size has increased by several times. The file sizes are now much too large.
    I know that I must need to alter some of the render settings but having tried altering many of the settings the result is always the same - a very large file size that is much bigger than my oringinal file.
    If anyone can let me know how I can carry out a simple crop & trim on a .mov file and end up with a smaller more compact file after rendering the video I would really appreciate it. Thanks in advance!

    Hi Marion,
    Thanks very much for your message. I have downloaded that program and it's definitely handy for examining the details of the original file. You mentioned in your message about not having to recode the file - The file I'm editing is originally from a Q3 Zoom video recorder and I can use their in-built software (handyware) to trim the file - this doesn't recode the file and so the file size just reduces by the required amount. Unfortunately there is no facility to crop the file with this software - I've looked for other software that would allow cropping without having to recode the file but I haven't found anything suitable for a simple procudure like this - do you know of any software that allows you to crop a file without recoding? Thanks.

  • Where can I find the file size of an image?

    In PS CS4, when you hover the mouse over an image, one that I have that is sized as a 5x7 at 200 ppi, it shows 933 kb.
    When I open the file, and look at the lower left of the screen, it shows a "Document Size" of 4.01 mb.
    The correct size is 933kb, because it's from a D200 10MP Raw file, converted into jpg, then downsized to the 5x7 at 200 ppi. Default sizes are basically 13x19 at 200 pp (which shows up as a Document Size of 28.7 mb).
    What is a "Document Size" (I think it's the actual dimension area, not pixel size), and why, when the image is open, can I not see the actual file size of 933k anywhere?

    jeff bach wrote:
    In PS CS4, when you hover the mouse over an image, one that I have that is sized as a 5x7 at 200 ppi, it shows 933 kb.
    You mean in Windows Explorer window? Photoshop will not show you such information.
    jeff bach wrote:
    What is a "Document Size" (I think it's the actual dimension area, not pixel size),....
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/photoshop/cs/using/WSfd1234e1c4b69f30ea53e41001031ab64-7508a.h tml
    .. can I not see the actual file size of 933k anywhere?
    No you can not. You may plan to save it as jpg with any amount of compression that will greatly influenced the file size and Photoshop is not that much intelligent yet to guess your plans :-)

  • I am trying to upload files to an Apple hosted feed on KSU iTunes U (unpublished site). The file size shows as 2 GB even though the files are 50MB. The upload stalls and fails. Address:

    I am trying to upload files to an Apple hosted feed on KSU iTunes U (unpublished site). The file size in the Feed Editor shows as 2 GB even though the files are 50MB. I am using Safari on Intel Mac 10.5.8. at Kennesaw State University. Any help would be appreciated.

    This is the second day. I tried using a new Apple feed to test. Still not working. I uploaded a 50MB mp3 file. The first time the upload failed. The second time the file showed that it was uploading a 2 GB file. It has been about 20 minutes now and shows "3.5GB of 2.0GB 178% Completed". Now it has started uploading all over again - it is now showing 399.4MB or 2.0 GB - 19% Completed. I dont know if this will keep looping - but I am going to Cancel.
    Please let me know what other information do you need from me. Definitely need some help with this!

  • Why are the file sizes of exported jpegs so small?

    I shoot raw, studio portraits mostly. I import to Lightroom 5 as DNG and then edit. Upon exporting as jpegs, the file sizes end up way too small, some of the cropped and/or black & white conversions as small as 560 KB, even with slider to 100%. Un-cropped color photos are ending up from 1.5 to 3MB. What am I doing wrong?

    Jim,
    Thank you for your response. I think some of the difficulties in this thread are that there have been more than one person reporting issues, which may or may not be exactly the same or different from the initial one reported by the original poster. Then, anyone else commenting can easily intermix bits and pieces from any or all of the other posters interrelated issues. Also, I should have added to my last response in clarification what I meant about the overall dimensions. I was referring specifically to inches, not file size, not resolution.
    My very first post was a thank you to Rusty's post for his comment about how he had noticed his Resolution setting had been changed from ppi to ppcm. I didn't say anything about printing. In fact, I never even stated what my issue was. I was merely thanking him for sharing information. So, for anyone to tell me that I didn't know what my issue is, that I didn't understand was quite laughable to me. And then the other two posters were almost equally ridiculous, who said that since they didn't experience the same conditions as myself and another person, it couldn't be a programming error.
    Trust me, I understand explicitly about resolution, image size, dimensions, file size and how they are all interrelated. Resolution is essentially the density of pixels. (And I'm still used to dpi vs ppi, that's how long I've been working with the concept.) I often help other people understand in whichever mode is most comfortable for them to grasp the knowledge of how to know what size image they need/want to capture and print depending on the types of measurements shown on their equipment used and by whomever they might be working with for finish work.
    I have a set process, I have set image sizes, I have an action recorded in Photoshop to shrink my images to 24" x 36" and save them in the proper folder with the proper name and another to shrink them to 8" x 12" and place them in the proper folder with the proper name. I am meticulous, so when the first image imported into Photoshop and it was 18.898" x 28.346", un-cropped, I couldn't figure it out. The file size was still just as large, the resolution was still 72, I hadn't changed any settings in Lightroom or Photoshop, the ONLY thing I had done was install an update. It didn't make sense to me that with the pixel dimensions still being the normal size, all of the sudden the inch dimensions were smaller. And I did need to be able to have the capability for a larger print size if/when I do want to print.
    I hope that I'm being clear now. I really was just trying to post a thank you initially. I hadn't expected all of this excess.
    I apologize for the troll statement. It wasn't meant for you directly, it was more for the grouping of comments which in my opinion didn't seem to be useful for the discussion and were instead just baiting. I shouldn't have allowed my bad mood to permeate my own comment regardless. I am also sorry for any other statements I made which might have come across wrong. I was trying to be funny with my first comment about programmers, but it might not have come across that way. I hadn't expected the rude and unnecessary comment back which I received, and that's where the trollish comments came from. That's why I only responded to that person once, despite the string of poking posts.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I uninstall adobe media encoder cc at macbook (Mavericks)?

    How do I uninstall adobe media encoder cc on macbook (Mavericks)? I have installed two versions (AME AME CC and CC 2014), AME CC 2014 has unistall file, but the application AME CC has unistall file or i can not find it. The situation is similar in th

  • Siri will NOT create reminder using location

    I'm having trouble creating a location based reminder.  I've set location service on Siri.  It knows my "home" and "work" locations based on my info. 1. Enable Siri. 2. I tell Siri to "set reminder" 3. Siri asks what I need to be reminded about, I sa

  • My Reload Icon has run away and hid and I can't find it

    First off let me thank anyone who might respond. I am as clueless as a chicken here. I have a new Mini Mac and in Safari I have managed to remove the little half circle with arrow icon that used to be up near the top and reloaded pages. I think there

  • Why does my time machine backup turn itself off all the time?

    This has happened to me several times that I notice that the icon on the menu bar is grayed out for the backup... I just noticed that again for the 10th time, and that the last backup was on December 30th, but I never turned off time machine.  I was

  • AppBuilder:create oData service

    Hi I have an error when I am trying to create a new odata service in appbuilder. As you can see below I enter the name of my database in the field of name and in the field of URL I put the URL that appears when I click on "open service document" in G