About the limitation of memory usage of Illustrator.

Please tell us about the behavior of the illustrator CS5/CS6 when memory usage of illustrator is too many.
The memory usage of Illustrator is increased, I think the application operates as follow.
- Warning display (e.g.:Illustrator can not preview)
- Illustrator stalls
1.Such as case, Is there memory usage limit?
2.In the case of memory usage of Illustrator exceed maximum size, how Illustrator works?
Is there a specification?
3.Is there the function of the memory auto-release in Illustrator?When the function work?

Thanks. Finally found where it is and turned off all alerts. Verizon doesn't make it easy to find where it is located. Appreciate the help.

Similar Messages

Some questions about the limit of memory usage of Adobe flash player in different OS & Web Browser

Hi Adobe experts,
I'm from HP, and now using Adobe flash player making some products about massive data displaying.
For my target, I need to show more than 200 K rows in client web browser, using AdvancedDataGrid.
And that may needs more than 200M to cache the data in Web browser memory space.
So, my questions are:
Does there any memory usage limit in flash player?
Say, if we have 4G bytes of physical memory in machine, in Windows, how much can I use in flash player?
Also, if we have 4G bytes of physical memory in Linux, how much can I use in flash player?
Does it depends on the Web Browser?
Say, is there any difference between different web browsers?
If the limit exists, can we control the limit?
Say, can we define some parameters in the tag in web page to expand the limitation?
Or, can we try to control this limitation by the Flash player management which exists in the Windows Control Panel?
Best Regards
Huang Haixu
+86 18616735091
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

1. Yes. The Toolkit for CreateJS is an extra downloadable extension for Flash CS6. It will publish html and js files that will provide the animation instead of the swf that you would normally publish. The success or failure of the resulting javascript version of your animation is the result of working within the constraints of the toolkit. You are pretty much constrained to using the timeline in Flash for your animations. If you work only in Actionscript, then the output will be very disappointing.
2. Edge outputs javascript, css, and html to give you an animation. The user interface allows you to design within the constraints of what Edge can do. You can preview and adjust and tweek your animation as you work. Edge is an html5 tool. It can create html5 animation. It is not a replacement for Flash. It is something that you can use instead of Flash to embed animation in html.
The problems and benefits of each are unique. Neither is a good substitute to learning javascript, css and html5. If you don't understand the code that is created from each of these tools, you can easily end up with huge, bloated, files that perform poorly. I'm very biased toward actually knowing what is going on. If I need to edit something, I want to be able to go into the code and make a change, not add an additional chunk of code to work around what was there. I don't use the timeline at all, and so nothing that I have will publish using CreateJS. Well, it will publish, but nothing happens because there is nothing on the timeline to translate.
You can download a trial of Flash CS6 and try the Toolkit for yourself. Edge is still in free preview, you can get a copy at http://labs.adobe.com and try it to see how it works.
Also, if you're not using the Greensock Animation Platform with Flash, have a look at that. It has recently been extended to provide Javascript analogues for most of the Libraries. http://www.greensock.com/

Is there any Vi for getting the CPU and Memory usage of the Local as well as Remote System

Is there any Vi for getting the CPU and Memory usage of the Local as well as Remote System

Find the attachment(LV8.5) for local machines.
You can use shared variables to monitor the remote machine's usage.
Attachments:
Task Monitor 85.vi ‏25 KB

WinXP and Vista memory usage with Illustrator CS2 - is Vista winning?

Dear forum.
I have an AI-template file where I insert some very large PNG files into it, modifies the template a bit and then I print the the resulting document in PS-format. The PNG files may be as large as 100 MB (24-bits, approx. 100 mil. pixels in total). It appears that while a Vista-based machine has no problem loading one or even two copies of these huge files into memory, a WinXP-based machine can't even load a single file into memory. Instead, I a dialog box with the message: "Could not read the file because the plug-in could not understand this file". Is it really a faulty plug-in or is it just CS2's way of saying "not enough memory" in a quirky way?
All in all, I would like to hear whether someone has the same experience with Vista, ie. it seems to be better at memory management or better at allocating memory for Illustrator CS2, enabling it to load large PNG files.
The specifications of the WinXP-based machine:
Pentium 4 2.6 GHz
3 GB RAM
Virtual memory 4095 MB in a physically separate drive from the OS disk
All Visual Effects are turned off
Has Illustrator CS2, Adobe Acrobat 7 and Distiller installed (and a few auxilliary programs)
The specifications of the Vista-based machine:
Dell OptiPlex 740SF
AMD x2 5000 (2.6 GHHz)
2 GB RAM (667 MHz, 2 x 1 GB)
250 GB SATA disk
Windows Vista
Adobe Creative Suite 2 Standard + Adobe Creative Suite 3
Thanks!

Hi, everyone
I got a new t440p 20ANA00UHH (8GB RAM, win8 64bits) about one week ago. It works really well, but its memory usage confused me. In Task Manager, the "Performance" option shows memory is 68% (5.4G in use), but "Users" option shows memory usage 66% (1019.5M in use). Is that normal ? I just opened some websites and word files.

About the PowerBook G4 Memory Slot Repair Extension

I was reading in the forum that many people have problems with the lower slot memory.
I am among these people too and as many of them my computer is a little bit older than those that are inside the program
my computer was bougth on may 2004 serial number W8418....
Since I think there are many people with the same problem, is there any way to ask to APPLE to extend the"slot repair extension program" also to the computers bought on 2004?
thanks in advance for your help

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
This is an oft discussed issue. You can try to sign the petition here:
http://lowermemoryslot.editkid.com/
Although given how long this issue has been going, I don't know if the person managing the petition is planning on submitting their petition anytime soon.
Your other option is sending Apple feedback here:
http://www.apple.com/contact/feedback.html
And contacting Apple corporate directly:
Apple
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
Don't expect any reaction. You can try zapping your PRAM and resetting your power manager, and possibly even replacing your clock battery which an authorized service technician can do. Also getting a new logic board either from AppleCare, or one of these resources may help:
http://www.dttservice.com/
http://www.powerbookresq.com/
http://www.microdocusa.com/
http://www.macspecialist.com/
http://www.techrestore.com/
Resetting the power manager is described here:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=14449
and the PRAM should only be done after verifying your clock battery is less than 4 years old (yours is, but others may not be). Here's how to reset the PRAM:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=2238

HT201303 Whose butt will be kicked for such a ignorant decision about the region and card usage? Apple will now dictate where i have to live, and where i need to creat a bank account and ask for card? This is rediculus!

Where is the benefit and what kind of another virtual measure it gives us?

I have absolutely no idea what it is you're on about. If you have a question or issue that you'd like us, your fellow users and the only people who participate here, to help you with, please calm down and post your issue in complete detail so we have some idea as to what to suggest. If you just want to rant, try Apple's feedback pages:
http://www.apple.com/feedback

About the right DDR3L memory I would like to add to mi notebook

Hello, My current Lenovo, model Z40-70 currently has 4 GB RAM and I'd like to add 4 more GB. What is the right Kind of memory I should buy, According to the documentation it has to be a DDR3L 1333MT/s MAX, is that right? Thank you1

Welcome to the Lenovo Community !
Page #77 of your model's Hardware Maintenance Manual is showing DDR3L 1600 MT/s memory for your system. Here is a listing from that manual........
SS M471B5173QH0-YK0 4GB DDR3L 1600
Hyn HMT451S6AFR8A-PB DDR3L 1600 4GB
RMT3170ME68F9F-1600 4GB DDR3L 1600(MC)
MC MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 4GB DDR3L 1600
M471B5173DB0-YK0 25nm 4GB DDR3L 1600
SK HMT451S6BFR8A-PB/RD 4GB DDR3L 1600
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 35nmQ 8GB DDR3L 1600
Hyn HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB DDR3L 1600 8GB
RMT3160ME68FAF-1600 8GB DDR3L 1600
Mic MT16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 DDR3L 1600 8GB
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 25nm 8GB DDR3L 1600
SK HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB/RD 8GB DDR3L 1600
For your reference your manual can be viewed or downloaded at the link below.....
https://download.lenovo.com/consumer/mobiles_pub/lenovo_g_z_40_series_hmm.pdf

About the hosts file (syntax/usage question)

Hi,
I am trying to block a handful of different websites that I do not want my daughter to use right now. I would like to use the hosts file to do this. Although I have basic familiarity with the hosts file and editing it, I am not completely certain as to how it works and how DNS works. If I want to, for example, block "yahoo.com" and all of its subdomains, would the following be an acceptable/valid entry?
127.0.0.1 *.yahoo.com
By not listing the subdomains of "yahoo.com", would that make it any liklier for those webpages to get through? If I were to also list out all of the "yahoo.com" subdomains that I have knowledge of along with the previous entry, would that cause any problems?
And the second part of my question is: Is the hosts file ever not top priority in lookup (on OS X 10.6.8, if it matters); and if so, is there a good way to make it always first?
Any help would be appreciated!
Thank you,
Michael

Use parental controls, maybe Dnsmasq, or a nanny-capable firewall-gateway-router box that's been configured on the edge of your network.
The /etc/hosts file also has specific sequence to get it reloaded; that file is read once and subsequenty cached. IIRC, you need to either /sudo dscacheutil -flushcache/ or /sudo killall -HUP mDNSResponder/ the DNS resolver.
If your child is technically inclined, or knows how to do basic internet research, or has discussions with the more nerd-ish among her peers, your child can learn how to bypass /etc/hosts and Dnsmasq using her own DNS translations, or with her own DNS services. That possibility would point toward either parental controls (easy), or the firewall-gateway-router box (added cost, but can block some or all systems on your local network).
Here's how easy it is to bypass the /etc/hosts block; launch Terminal.app and issue the equivalent of:
dig +short @8.8.8.8 host.example.com
for the host.example.com host that you're (she's) interested in. (There are other commands that can be used; more than just dig can be used here, and there are web sites that can perform this translation for you.) Then connect to the IP address that this command emits. Your /etc/hosts block will not prevent this, and will not block this.
If your daughter is somewhat more technically savvy, a VPN will bypass the /etc/hosts blocks. She'll need access to a VPN server, and those are available from various free and very low-cost sources...

What's the recommended setting for "Process memory usage" ("process virtual" in UI) for a 64-bit host on a 64-bit OS?

Hi gurus
In resource based throttling, what's the recommended setting for "Process memory usage" ("process virtual" in the resource based throttling tab of the UI) for a 64-bit host
on a 64-bit Windows OS?
According to MS (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee308808(v=bts.10).aspx):
"By default, the
Process memory usage throttling threshold is set to 25. If this value is exceeded and the BizTalk process memory usage is more than 300 MB, a throttling condition may occur. On a 32-bit
server, you can increase the Process memory usage value to 50. On a 64-bit server, you can increase this value to 100. This allows for more memory consumption by the BizTalk process before throttling
occurs."
Does this mean that 100 is the recommended setting for a 64-bit host on a 64-bit Windows?
Thanks
Michael Brandt Lassen

Hi Michael,
Recommended setting is the default setting which is 25 .dot.
If your situation is abnormal and you see message delivery throttling state to “4” when the following performance counters are high or if you expect any of you integration
process could have impact on following counters, then you can consider the suggestion by Microsoft. Don’t change the default setting.
High process memory
Process memory usage (MB)
Process memory usage threshold (MB)
You can see these counters under “BizTalk:MessageAgent”
You can gauge these performance counter and its maximum values if have done any regression/performance testing in your test servers. If you have seen these counters having
high values and causing throttling, then you can update the Process memory usage.
Or unexpectedly you’re process high throughput messages in production which is causing these counters to go high and cause throttling, then up can update the Process memory
usage.
The above two cases where I know my expected process usage (by doing performance testing) or suddenly my production server processing has gone high due to unexpected business
hike (or any reasons) which caused throttling, then do changes to default throttling setting.
Just changing the default setting without actual reason could have adverse effect where you end up allocating
more processing capacities but the actual message processing message usage ever is low means you end up investing in underutilised resources.
Regards,
M.R.Ashwin Prabhu
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Problem with JTree and memory usage

I have problem with the JTree when memory usage is over the phisical memory( I have 512MB).
I use JTree to display very large data about structure organization of big company. It is working fine until memory usage is over the phisical memory - then some of nodes are not visible.
I hope somebody has an idea about this problem.

55%, it's still 1.6Gb....there shouldn't be a problem scanning something that it says will take up 300Mb, then actually only takes up 70Mb.
And not wrong, it obviously isn't releasing the memory when other applications need it because it doesn't, I have to close PS before it will release it. Yes, it probably is supposed to release it, but it isn't.
Thank you for your answer (even if it did appear to me to be a bit rude/shouty, perhaps something more polite than "Wrong!" next time) but I'm sitting at my computer, and I can see what is using how much memory and when, you can't.

Problem with memory usage and CPU usage

Hello,
i have a problem with the memory usage and cpu usage in my project!
My application must run for more than 24 hrs. The problem is that the longer it runs the bigger is the memory and cpu usage!
It starts with ~15% CPU usage and ~70 MBytes memory usage. After ~ 24hrs the CPU usage is ~60% and the memory usage is ~170 MBytes!
After 3 days the CPU usage is almost about 70% and the memory usage is about 360 MBytes!
What can I do to reduce this huge recource usage?
Thank you!

Hi Pahe,
   I think the issue is memory usage, since CPU usage can increase due to greater memory requirements.
   Anyway, it's difficult to debug without seeing your code, can you post it (possibly for LV 7.1 compatibility)? Or just post a JPEG of the piece of code that can give problems...
   I guess you're appending data to an array instead of replace data elements, but I can't be sure...
   Have a nice day!
graziano

High memory usage problem

Firefox regularly creeps up to about 350 mb of memory usage. It runs poorly, crashes, etc. I read some other posts about how to reduce the its memory usage via about:config tweaks. I made adjustments to browser.cache.disk.capacity (was set to over 1,000,000, reduced to 50,000) and config.trim_on_minimize. However, memory usage has not decreased. I also see the value browser.cache.disk.smart_size_cached_value;1048576. I changed this to 50,000 also, but it reverts to the original number after every restart.
I have 3 tabs open right now (Hotmail, Google, and this page) and memory is at 242,000.
I should also note that I recently reformatted my hard drive. Firefox has almost no extensions or plug-ins installed (other than things like Flash and Silverlight). I'm running Windows 7 64-bit, and have 6 gb of RAM.
Any suggestions for alleviating this problem would be greatly appreciated.

235 to 285 MB seems to be a rather low notification threshold on a PC that has 3GB installed, not even 10% of RAM being used and that message is triggered.
That's a new feature in AVG, and I suspect it might need a little tweaking. Unfortunately AVG didn't seem to provide any user adjustments into that feature, so the best thing to do is turn it off if that warning message appears too often.
Here's an AVG support thread where the users says he gets that message with IE, Chrome, and Firefox. <br />
http://forums.avg.com/us-en/avg-forums?sec=thread&act=show&id=180124

Memory usage exceed -Xmx option in Windows 2000.

Hi ,
I run the java application with -Xms300M -Xmx600M option in Windows 2000.
When I start the application, it's virtual memory size is 300M.
(In Windows TaskManager choose the Processes Tab and select "Select Columns..." option in View menu. And check the "Virtual Memory Size".)
After several test I found that it's virtual memory size is bigger than 600M in Windows TaskManager.
It's virtual memory size is about 650M.
Why the application's memory usage is bigger than 600M despite of -Xmx600M?

The -Xms and -Xmx control the Java heap size only.
The stack does not go on the heap, and the VM will need some memory of its own as well.

Memory Usage: Heap space vs System Monitor

Hi guys
I'm trying to wrap my head around something which seems pretty complicated. We have an enterprise app making use of Jasper Reports. When a report is generated, the app's memory usage in the Linux (Ubuntu 8.10) System Monitor shoots up by around 20MB (the more data on the report, the higher that number). After the report is closed, memory usage doesn't decrease. This is resulting in performance issues, and memory usage given by the System Monitor doesn't match up with the results given by the NetBeans profiler. There is a huge difference between the values indicated by the System Monitor, and the heap space given by the profiler. I've done some fairly detailed checking using the profiler, and according to that, there are 0 instances of our report generating classes in memory after closing a generated report. I've read a bunch of articles on the net, but I'm still stumped. My best guess is that something weird is happening somewhere in the Jasper code, but I can't really think of a way to confirm that. Does anyone have any idea what could be causing this and how to prevent it? Any help will be much appreciated; thanks.
P.S. I've posted on the Jasper forums are well, but to no avail. [http://jasperforge.org/plugins/espforum/view.php?group_id=102&forumid=103&topicid=65335]
Edit: We're using Java 6 (we've recreated the issue on a few release of Java 6), and Jasper Reports 3.0.1. (Just in case that is important)

One thing about your test is that using Xms110m will cause the JVM to NEVER give back any memory, because it won't ever go below 110M. I altered your test a bit:
import java.util.LinkedList;
public class MemTest {
   private static LinkedList<byte[]> mem = new LinkedList<byte[]>();
   public static void main(String[] args) {
        try {
            System.out.println("Initial:");
            print();
            useMem();
            System.out.println("Allocated:");
            print();
            clearMem();
            System.out.println("Deallocated:");
            print();
            for (;;) {
               Thread.sleep(10000);
               System.out.println("After 10 seconds: ");
               print();
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            ex.printStackTrace();
   private static void useMem() {
      for (;;) {
         try {
            mem.add(new byte[1024*1024]);
         } catch (OutOfMemoryError e) {
            //free up a few MB to make sure we don't get an OOME while trying to print, etc
            mem.removeFirst();
            mem.removeFirst();
            mem.removeFirst();
            break;
   private static void clearMem() {
      mem = null;
      System.gc();
      System.gc();
      System.gc();
   private static void print() {
      long free = Runtime.getRuntime().freeMemory();
      long total = Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory();
      double freeFraction = (((double)free) / (total)) * 100;
      System.out.printf("\tAvailable: %d\tTotal: %d\tFree: %4.2f%%%n", free, total,
            freeFraction);
}When I ran it with
-Xms16m -Xmx1024m -XX:MinHeapFreeRatio=20 -XX:MaxHeapFreeRatio=30I got these results:
Initial:
     Available: 16518016     Total: 16711680     Free: 98.84%
Allocated:
     Available: 2070952     Total: 1065484288     Free: 0.19%
Deallocated:
     Available: 582957376     Total: 583073792     Free: 99.98%
After 10 seconds:
     Available: 582953224     Total: 583073792     Free: 99.98%As you can see, the JVM did return about half of the memory back. ProcExp shows ~592MB used, and peaked ~1000MB. But right now it's still running, and still holding at 583MB.
I've read bug reports like this, but honestly have no idea what the people at Sun are talking about. I don't see the footprint being reduced. I don't know, maybe if I wait a couple of days...

High browser memory usage when streaming video

I'm using Flex 4 and the Spark VideoPlayer. I'm creating an application where you switch between several videos. I noticed that the browser memory usage increases significantly when changing videos and never releases the memory. I ran tests where the video is being served over a content delivery network that has Flash Media Server, so the content shouldn't be caching in the browser. I profiled my Flex application and the memory usage increases slightly when changing videos. I think that is attributed to this bug: https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25785. However, my browser memory usage increases about 20MB when changing videos. The video file I used to test is an mp4 file that is about 3MB in size. I tried testing using a small video (about 300Kb) and noticed an increase of about 5MB in browser memory usage every time I replayed it. So it looks like it's based on the video file size. I was testing on Firefox and noticed the same results in Chrome. Any idea why the browser memory usage would increase so much every time the video is loaded?
Thanks in advance.

That's normal for your machine. Video is fairly demanding in the integrated Intel GPU in that machine. Your CPU has to do much of the video processing. As a result, your fans will speed up to cool off the CPU which is working fairly hard. It's completely normal and all of the MacBooks with the same GPU experience the same thing.

About the limitation of memory usage of Illustrator.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for