ABST2 Error while doing Fixed Assets Closing

Hi,
I've run into an error of 0.01 in account 161370. I need to get past this or write off the difference in order to close the year..
Note: For 2008 Fixed assets closing i have executed ABST2 transaction now in this July-2009.When i execute ABST2,i am getting the below report.
CoCd  Acct no.   Year S  1st local difference 
3000  161370      2009                   0.01-                
Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
Message no. MQ555
Diagnosis
Differences occurred in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and G/L accounts.
Procedure
Using program RFEWSBAL, select the accounts for which differences occurred. To do this, proceed as follows:
1. Changeover package: Active package
Phase: ANALYZE
Origin of change: AS
            Proceed
1. Analyze the accounts containing errors using note 104567.
If the document number field contains the entry "W004", this means that although a difference exists in the balance carried forward, this difference was charged off at the key date. Following local currency changeover, the system adjusts the currency differences at the key date only, but not in the balance carried forward.
If the entry "W004" exists for all affected accounts, the status is set to warning instead of error. If the correction at key date described above proves sufficient, you can continue changing over the local currency without additional adjustments in the previous year.
However, SAP does recommend that you make corrections in the previous year in line with note 104567 since this ensures that the balance carried forward is also reconciled.
Kindly Help me in this regard
Suvarna

Hi,
I've run into an error of 0.01 in account 161370. I need to get past this or write off the difference in order to close the year..
Note: For 2008 Fixed assets closing i have executed ABST2 transaction now in this July-2009.When i execute ABST2,i am getting the below report.
CoCd  Acct no.   Year S  1st local difference 
3000  161370      2009                   0.01-                
Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
Message no. MQ555
Diagnosis
Differences occurred in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and G/L accounts.
Procedure
Using program RFEWSBAL, select the accounts for which differences occurred. To do this, proceed as follows:
1. Changeover package: Active package
Phase: ANALYZE
Origin of change: AS
            Proceed
1. Analyze the accounts containing errors using note 104567.
If the document number field contains the entry "W004", this means that although a difference exists in the balance carried forward, this difference was charged off at the key date. Following local currency changeover, the system adjusts the currency differences at the key date only, but not in the balance carried forward.
If the entry "W004" exists for all affected accounts, the status is set to warning instead of error. If the correction at key date described above proves sufficient, you can continue changing over the local currency without additional adjustments in the previous year.
However, SAP does recommend that you make corrections in the previous year in line with note 104567 since this ensures that the balance carried forward is also reconciled.
Kindly Help me in this regard
Suvarna

Similar Messages

  • Error while doing ABGL Asset Credit Memo

    Hi Friends,
    I am getting the below error while doing Asset Credit Memo in ABGL. Please help me in fix this issue.
    Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01
    Note:In Asset Explorer Fiscal year start Asset value is 98,425.45 and Change is 4768.19. So total Asset value as of now is 1,03,193.64.
    Now we are trying to do ABGL with 12,790.23 value (Transaction type is 105). System is giving the above highlighted error.
    If we give the amount 4768.19 in ABGL transaction, system is not giving any error. If we give more that that system is giving error.
    Why system is giving error even the asset has balance of 1,03,193.64? Please help me on this..
    Thanks
    Sunil

    Hi,
    If the asset has been capitalized during earlier years, use ABGF to post credit memo.  ABGL is meant for assets capitalized during the year.
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Error While doing the Asset Credit Memo -ABGL

    HI,
    While doing the Asset Credit Memo -ABGL,i am getting the below error.Kindly help me with your inputs.
    Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01
    Message no. AA629
    Asset affected: 406000000004-0000
    Diagnosis
    With the transaction entered, the balance for the transactions in group 10 in area 01 will be negative in this fiscal year. However, the balance of transaction type group 10, according to its definition, must be positive in each fiscal year.
    System response
    The system rejects this posting.
    Procedure
    Check the transaction type, the amount and the fiscal year in your posting. If you want to post a credit memo to an acquisition from the previous year, then use a transaction type for a retirement. If necessary, you can change balance rules after talking with your SAP consultant.
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Check your config in OABN / OADB
    The depriciation area 01 can allow you post values only postive .. in OADB
    it has maintained Acquisition values Postive or zero values and net book
    values has miantained Postive or 0 values. so based on this setting u cannt
    post any negative values for this asset.

  • Getting error while doing Intercompany asset transfer

    This is the first time that they are doing an intercompany asset transfer in our client. Intracompany asset transfers were done in the past. While doing an intercompany transfer, an error is popping up as given below.:
    Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found for area 01
    Message no: Au133
    Diagnosis
    When creating the accounting document the system could not find account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' in depreciation area 01 for Company code( sending company code)
    Procedure:
    Enteer this account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
    Since, this is the first time an intercompany transfer is happening I assume that there is some configuration or some settign that might have to be done. Please could you help me.

    Hi,
    first set your COD with OAPL.
    Go to transaction AO90 and select your COA and click on account determination, and select the account determination key, which is used for your sending asset and doublie click on blanace sheet accounts.
    There one field will be there called Contra account: Acquisition value, so enter a B/S GL account there and SAVE it.
    Since this account is required to enter at both COD level, like sending assets COD and receiving assets COD. But if you have your both assets in same COD, no need to maintain twice.
    The purpose of this GL account is used while transfering one asset from one company code to another to capture the NBV as clearing entry between inter company code trasnfers. (This is as good as OBYA settings in FI). But this GL account here is not specific for one particular company code as like in FI.
    This will solve your problem.
    Cheers,
    Srinu

  • Error while creating fixed asset using BAPI BAPI_FIXEDASSET_OVRTAKE_CREATE

    Hi
    I am getting an error stating "O DEP START field is not ready for input, while trying to create asset using the BAPI BAPI_FIXEDASSET_OVRTAKE_CREATE.How to make the field input enabled in BAPI .Kindly suggest.
    Thanks

    Hello,
    Review AO21.
    Regards
    Waza

  • ABT1N-Getting Error while doing Intercompany asset transfer

    Hi,
    Due to a merger of two comapny codes, my clients needed to make an intercompany asset transfer (transaction code ABT1N), with company code 099 as the sending company code and 200 as the receiving company code). However they got the following error message:
    AU133
    Contra account is not assigned.
    Is it necessary to assign conta accounts In AO90 for intercompany asset transfer?
    Could anyone suggest me what are the necessary settings required for intercompany asset transfer?

    yes maintain contra account  in ao90
    Edited by: Anil Kumar Potnuru on Feb 10, 2009 4:50 PM

  • Error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation

    Hi,
    I am getting the below error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation scenario. Please help me to fix this issue.
    Tax code V1 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
    Message no. FF713
    Diagnosis
    You entered a tax code which is not defined for the country of the company code to be posted to in the tax calculation procedure.
    System Response
    Procedure
    Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
    Procedure for System Administration
    If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    Check whether the company code is assigned to the correct country and whether the correct tax calculation procedure has been entered for the company code country.
    Create a new tax code if necessary.
    Caution:
    Since it is possible that the tables in question are being updated at a different time on another computer, it can take a certain amount of time for the tax code to be on all local machines in client server architectures after saving the new code.
    Thanks
    KB

    Hi,
    you need to maintain Tax Code A0 & V0 in t.code OBCL t.code.
    and also ensure to check whether you have created tax code V1 or not in FTXP t.code. If not, create V1 tax code and assign GL on that in the right Transaction event keys in OB40.
    Try.... if not working let me know....
    Regards,
    MOhan.

  • Error  While doing ABT1N transaction

    Hi,
    I am facing the below error while doing ABT1N in Asset Accounting.Please help me in fixing this Issue.
    Error Message -No depreciation area for receiving the revenue
    Message no.AAPO149
    Diagnosis
    You tried to post a retirement on asset 1000 100007-0.You entered transaction type 300,in which the retirement with revenue indicator is not set
    You tried to transfer asset 1000 100007-0.According to transfer variant 0001,none of the areas on the asset uses a transaction type for retirement with revenue
    In  both of these cases, you are not allowed to enter revenue or make specifications for the determination of revenue.
    Proceedure
    Check the transfer variant  and check your entry
    please do the needful
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hello,
    You will have a check box for the same.
    Double click on transaction type, you will see the check box for revenue.
    Otherwise, tomorrow I will get back to you once I am in front of the system.
    Regards,
    Ravi
    Edited by: Ravi Sankar Venna on May 5, 2009 7:53 PM

  • Tax Jurisdiction Error While Doing ABZON -AssetTransaction

    Hi,
    While implementing the SAP,we have defined the Tax Jurisdiction Codes with 9 digits.After that client requested to change the Tax Jurisdiction Code to 10 digits and we removed 9 digits and Created Tax Jurisdiction with 10 digits and moved to Production System.
    Now the Issue is- While doing the asset transaction in ABZON transaction code,System is giving the below error messange Tax Code I0 does not exist for jurisdiction code LA0000000.Kindly help me how to solve this issue.
    Error Message is - Message no.FF718
    NOTE:- In the above issue it is giving the error with 9 Digits Tax Jurisdiction code LA0000000 which does not exists in the system.
    My Doubt is - Why the system is not picking the 10 digits Tax Jurisdiction Code? *Why it is taking 9 digits tax jurisdiction code even though it was deleted from the system?
    Kindly advice me how to fix this Issue?
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hi,
    Thanks for your quick response.I have checked in the FTXP and found that there is no Tax Jurisdiction codes with 9 digits.
    I have a doubt -why this error came- Initially we have created Tax codes with 9 digits Tax Jurisdiction Codes.After that we did not do any changes to the Tax codes which are already created & then Deleted all 9 Digits Tax Jurisdiction codes to create 10 Digits Tax Jurisdiction codes.Finally we created 10 digits tax jurisdiction codes and used the Old tax codes which are already created at that time of 9 digits Tax Jurisdiction Code.
    Kindly think of my doubt i raised above and suggest me weather that could be the reason for the error?
    Thanks
    Supriya

  • Error while doing "Visulaize Plan"

    Hi,
    Before i did Visualize plan many times without any problem.Now I am getting error while doing so.
    I was able to run "Explain Plan" successfully.
    I am on HANA revision 60.
    I saved above error log and the log information is given below:
    I can identify invalid XML tag <TablesInvolved><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></TablesInvolved> but how to fix this issue?
    I gone through various blogs related to Visulaization Plan but not found related to this issue.
    <Plan xmlns="http://www.sap.com/ndb/planviz" ID="ID_0" Type="Estimated">
    <SQL><![CDATA[SELECT KOKRS, BELNR, PERIO, SUM(MEGBTR)
    FROM "_SYS_BIC"."raj/AN_VIZ"
    GROUP BY KOKRS, BELNR, PERIO]]></SQL>
    <CompileTime>
      <Start Unit="us">1401281467643661</Start>
      <End Unit="us">1401281467658329</End>
    </CompileTime>
    <RootRelation ID="ID_0" TypeName="PROJECT" Status="Finished">
      <Name>Project</Name>
      <ExecutionType>Row Search</ExecutionType>
      <Summary><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO, SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)]]></Summary>
      <Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
      <EstimatedCost>
       <Exclusive Unit="us">2.12902e+06</Exclusive>
       <Inclusive Unit="us">2.64021e+06</Inclusive>
      </EstimatedCost>
      <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
      <Details><![CDATA[{"Projected Cols":"raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO, SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)","Project column0":"NString(4, 0)  __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [3]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
      /1/ void*  \"__rids__\" ....... [0]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
      /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [1]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
      /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [2]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column1":"NString(10, 0)  __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [8]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
      /1/ void*  \"__rids__\" ....... [5]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
      /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [6]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
      /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 1 ....... [7]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column2":"NString(3, 0)  __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [13]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
      /1/ void*  \"__rids__\" ....... [10]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
      /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [11]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
      /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 2 ....... [12]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column3":"Decimal(18, 3)  __typecast__() ....... [23]:076:<10/12 (16B)>:
      /1/ Fixed16(18, 3)  __trex_field_Fixed16__() ....... [19]:043:<6/8 (16B)>: 
         /1/ void*  \"__rids__\" ....... [15]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
         /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [16]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
         /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [17]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:
         /4/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [18]:LOAD:<5/6 (4B)>: 
      /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 18 ....... [21]:LOAD:<8/9 (4B)>:
      /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [22]:LOAD:<9/10 (4B)>:"}]]></Details>
      <Child ID="ID_8" >
      </Child>
    </RootRelation>
    <Relation ID="ID_8" TypeName="TREX_SEARCH" Status="Finished">
      <Name>Column Search</Name>
      <ExecutionType>Column Search</ExecutionType>
      <Summary><![CDATA[Aggregation on a single table]]></Summary>
      <Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
      <EstimatedCost>
       <Exclusive Unit="us">511194</Exclusive>
       <Inclusive Unit="us">511194</Inclusive>
      </EstimatedCost>
      <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
      <TablesInvolved><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></TablesInvolved>
      <LogicalPlan ID="ID_11" Type="Estimated">
       <RootRelation ID="ID_11" TypeName="PROJECT" Status="Finished">
        <Name>Project</Name>
        <EstimatedCost>
         <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
         <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
        </EstimatedCost>
        <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
        <Child ID="ID_12" >
        </Child>
       </RootRelation>
       <Relation ID="ID_12" TypeName="GROUP_BY" Status="Finished">
        <Name>Aggregation</Name>
        <Summary><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO\nSUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)]]></Summary>
        <EstimatedCost>
         <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
         <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
        </EstimatedCost>
        <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
        <Details><![CDATA[{"Grouping Cols":"raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO","Aggregation Cols":"SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)"}]]></Details>
        <Child ID="ID_13" >
        </Child>
       </Relation>
       <Relation ID="ID_13" TypeName="TABLE" Status="Finished">
        <Name>Column View</Name>
        <Schema><![CDATA[_SYS_BIC]]></Schema>
        <ObjectName><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></ObjectName>
        <Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
        <EstimatedCost>
         <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
         <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
        </EstimatedCost>
        <EstimatedOutputCardinality>682404</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
       </Relation>
      </LogicalPlan>
    </Relation>
    </Plan>
    Regards
    Raj

    Hi,
    To solve this you must update your studio. In lower studio versions (PlanViz) does not allow "unknown" XML tags sent by higher version servers. A fix for this issue was made so that PlanViz parser can simply skip unknown tags.
    Please go to version 74, if possible.
    Regards,
    Michael

  • Error while doing billing

    Hi every one'
    i got an error while doing billing
    Error :sub transactions in schema Z step 0001 inconsistent,
    this error is comming while using transaction eamabi,
    the schema is worked properly since i updated a line item for additional TAX,
    and we created new sub transactins for additional vat,AND for the sub transactions i have added a new GL account,
    and i have added those Sub transactions in the respective field of the rate,
    I have maintained properly all the fica setting for the sub trasactions...like ek01 and ek02 and table te305 & tfktvo as well. Dont understand where the setting have been missed..Please let me kow if you come acrosee this kind of situation.
    later i have deleted all the line items in tha same schema,and i have given only quanti01  variant
    and does not have any vat related line item maintained at schema even though the same error proposed.
    regards
    BekMs

    I think you need to ask FICA person to fix the subs, This is not billing or rate error. There must be some config missing in sub's and main. If you give another try with any other subs it should work. This will help you to double check too.
    GG

  • Error while doing Parked document posting in FBV0

    Hi,
    I am getting the below dump error while doing FBV0 - Parked document posting. Can you please help me to fix this.. I have also maintained FBVB. But still i am facing this.
    Thanks
    Sunil

    Error details missing, like error message no, error text.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Error while doing F-22 entry

    Hi,
    I am getting the below error while doing F-22. Kindly help me how to over come this Bug..
    Error Message : Express Document "Update was terminated" received from author RWRGV1
    Please help me why this is coming and how to fix this to post the document?
    Many Thanks
    Sunil

    Hi,
    Go to transaction SM13 and give the username as RWRGV1 and then execute.
    It will show you the task failed to be updated. You can go in details by double clicking on this task to find where it has failed.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • No rfc destination defined for global trade services error while doing migo

    Hi all,
    Pls help me in fixing the following error..
    "no rfc destination defined for global trade services" error while doing migo

    i guess you will be getting dumps in the background in ST22. Can you please check this and post the details if there are any dumps?
    Meanwhile, check this note:
    Note 1098491 - MIGO:Termination MESSAGE_TYPE_X with IO 304 (subcontracting)
    Cheers,
    Jazz

  • Error while doing EHP4 upgrade in downtime phase

    HI .
    Iam facing the below error while doing the EHP4 upgrade , in downtime phase.
    Checks after phase MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative!
    Last error code set: RFC call to subst_get_uvers failed with key RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION (open): SAP_CMINIT3 : rc=20 >
    Connect to SAP gateway failed Connect_PM GWHOST=Hydhtc4526D, GWSERV=sapgw04, SYSNR=04  LOCATION CPIC (TCP/IP) on local host with Unicode ERROR partner '10.136.162.30:3304' not reached TIME Mon Jun 06 18:17:46 2011 RELEASE 720 COMPONENT NI (network interface) VERSION 40 RC -10 MODULE nixxi.cpp LINE 3286 DETAIL NiPConnect2: 10.136.162.30:3304 SYSTEM CALL connect ERRNO 10061 ERRNO TEXT WSAECONNREFUSED: Connection refused COUNTER System start failed
    Please help me in resolving this error.
    Sanketh.

    Hi,
    Upgrade tool is trying to start the system but system is not coming up. Try to start system manually and see if system comes up or not. If not then check logs in work directory for why system is not coming up.
    Thanks
    Sunny

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to get spool from background job run?

    Hello, I have this situation and need help on how to resolve: I have RFC FM which called from another system, in that FM I am submitting BDC section as a batch job by report RSBDCSUB. The problem is that this job may run for 1 or 2 hours and my RFC c

  • Function calling a function

    Hello, If a fumction say F1 is calling an another function say F2. If I change the definition of the function F2, then what will happen with the function F1. (F1and F2 are stored function) Does Oracle automatically recompile the function F1? THANKS.

  • Byte to long conversion.

    Hello. If you run this code, the result is "-13". Why this if "ó" value is 243? Thanks. public class prueba3 public static void main(String args[]) byte[] b="óxxfd".getBytes(); long b64=0; b64=(long)b[0]; System.out.println(b64); }

  • Sporadic phone issues - re-reregistering, garbled voice, garbled ringing, pulling non-voice IP

    Some of our phones, but not all are having the following issues. The problem will happen sporadically throughout the day. When not having issues the phones function just fine. Phone call quality is bad including WAN calls and analog calls. When the p

  • WRT160N and WUSB600N slow connection

    Im running WINDOW VISTA Using COMCAST CABLE  Hi, I got a WRT160N router. Using it with my WUSB600N(running VISTA) adapter. Some how my connection is really slow. I am also using my WUSB54GS(running XP) adapter with the router and connection is good t