Accelerated Pay

Configured a new payment term for accelerated pay of AP00. the payment is within 2 days.
In the Maintain Payment Terms for Fast Pay/Accelerated Pay we put AP00 and 30UU. The problem is when we set the payment proposal (F110) date 15 days from today's date it will charge interest for accelerated pay. The only time the payment proposal should charge interest is if its 30 days late.
Any ideas on how to fix the issue?

Nowhere on the EE site does it say 60 days Where you see that? The EE form says 10 working days for non-Apple.
The only way to unlock an EE device while abroad is to get an EE PAYG SIM for it off somewhere like eBay, register an online account for it in your own name with EE and top it up with at least £9 to cover the unlocking fee and apply to EE to unlock it by filling in the Unlocking your device form as the PAYG option. You can use any UK addy. They don't actually send anything there.
But before you do make sure you have some way with loading the SIM with GBP, for which you will certainly need a UK bank or credit card. It is not free to unlock a device with EE.

Similar Messages

Publice Sector, prompt pay during testing

Hai Team,
I have three issues;
01) When I post invoices marked for Prompt pay N30, small amouts are immediately turned as Accelerated pay.
02) When i post invoices, it is pickingup invoice date to calculate due dates. Instead it should be doing Invoice date or GR date whichever is later.
Could some one reply?

-

I have to PAY to get my Audigy2zs working?

I have had problems with my Audigy 2zs, and identical problems with my 'replacement' Audigy 4, from day one under Windows XP, only playing back 2 sounds in most games, popping and hissing under high CPU/memory loads, flat out won't play any sound in some games, Creative bloatware causing system crashes and memory overload, inconsistent volume, problems installing the drivers, etc.
Then I move to Vista and the stupid sound won't play in games without a massi've CPU overload, robbing me of frames rendered in a major way. (About a 20% performance loss.) I finally go back to on-board sound after struggling with it for a week. I get much better performance and much better sound with my ALC850 than I have with either my Audigy 2zs or my Audigy 4. I didn't like using it under XP because it would cause crashes too, but less than the 2 Creative cards. However, under Vista, the problems have all gone away.
I spent $200 on those 2 cards. I actually trusted that Creative, who had supplied me with such good audio cards, with such nice features, in the past with my SB Pro, SB 6, and SB AWE64. I trusted that they would give me a good audio card. Wow, was I wrong! They were total junk. If I didn't install the whole bloated software suite with it, I didn't get the features, yet if I did install their bloated crap, it would cause the system to crash constantly.
Now, in order to get those features with Vista, I have to PAY!?!?!?!?! They never worked right to begin with, and I don't expect this stuff to work with Vista either, but I would have to PAY EXTRA to find out?!?! That sucks in a big way!
Creative, you better get your heads out of your collecti've bloated rear ends and start listening to the people who use your hardware. You have lost far too many customers over the past couple years due to your crappy support, and I think this is going to lose you even more. You lost me as a customer a while ago, and I just love ranting in your faces about it, but you are going to dri've the company into the ground this way. I will be laughing at the 'funeral' of your company when you shut down because of too much lost business.

actually they dont give a rats ass about the sound card department...
creatives business has shifted vastly away from that for years already..
the money is made elsewhere.
For me they made the wrong deciscon letting other companies
grab the gigantic market of onboard chipset solutions and
sticking to their little niche product called PCI addon card.
A market that is bound to stay small and get even smaller the
more integrated stuff evolves. I mean just watch the price
tags...the lowest end X-FI shipped for way over 00 Euro
at release. For that price i used to get almost the Top End
card back in the old days. Probably theyll always find enough
people to buy their label tricked cards and on the Top End
to the folks who need all the gadgets and stuff.
But clearly ..NO professional sound engineer i ever heard
of uses Soundblaster Cards for business...
Anyway soundcards that come at the price of a midrange
GFX Card or even more exspensi've bloated with features
noone hardly ever uses...oh well bound to fail in the
midrange perspecti've i think.
And since Vista took away the control of the soundboard
makers..things will get more and more difficult.
Imagine u want to develop a new sound acceleration or
gaming sound standard...X-FI was a humungeous FLOP
already and that wasnt even restricted by Vista..
I personally only know the BF2 and 242 titles that
actually brand support X-FI and to be honest i dont
hear a dime worth of difference on my X-FI music compared
to hardware sound.
I would clearly consider taking the step into integrated
solutions and blow away the competition with daugther
boards that have A)Superior PCB B)next to none interference
C) top quality parts D) coax and optical out (please no
more flexijack crap) E) top of the line codecs F) true
HD Fidelity for a reasonable price to bundle with flagship
motherboards of all big mobo makers. Leave the lower end
to the AC crappers and Intel HD crackle.
And for software..way to many resources wasted on things
others do 000x better than creative will ever do.
Focus on superior driver design. Frequent updates.
A good EQ, Mixer and tools that give total control over
every input/output and speaker setup. Thats all people
really need. And for the rest of the useless bloatware,
just dont try to reinvent the wheel. There is loads of
semi-pro , pro and even FREE software out that can do
the job and get the job done, u cannot compete with
real audio software makers...u could focus on making
proper interfacing with the major brands.Message Edited by sabrehawk on 07-05-200708:32 PM

How to make smooth hardware accelerated JApplet?

Hi there ive made a game that extends JPanel and im using the paintComponent method to do my painting
as far as i know JPanel is hardware accelerated by default bufferStrategy(2)
ive put the JPanel in a JFrame and the game runs very smooth with ~62fps and cpu usage is <10%
then i tried putting the JPanel in JApplet and opened it in firefoxbrowser and the fps says ~59fps and cpu usage ~30% but its super skippy and looks like its drawing incorrectly like some of the objects are displaced very far from where they are supposed to be some frames and drawn perfectly some other frames. What's happening? Is there anyway to fix this?
Below is some code that for a JApplet and JFrame they both contain the JPanel and ive packed everything in a jar file that can be run as a desktopapp or japplet
I've also tried add the JApplet directly into the JFrame but it seems the performance might go down a little (though im not sure how much)
main extends JApplet
RobotValkyrieAttack extends JPanel
package RobotValkyrieAttack;
import javax.swing.*;
import java.awt.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
public class main extends JApplet{
     static LinkedList<Image> listImage;
     //no JApplet constructor is allowed to be overrriden
     public void init(){ //called by the japplet container
          this.loadImages();
          RobotValkyrieAttack r = new RobotValkyrieAttack(listImage);
          this.add(r);
          Thread t = new Thread(r);
          t.start();
          this.addKeyListener(r);
     public void loadImages(){
          //images
          listImage = new LinkedList<Image>();
          listImage.add( new ImageIcon(this.getClass().getResource("data/valkyrie0.png")).getImage() );
          listImage.add( new ImageIcon(this.getClass().getResource("data/astroid0.png")).getImage() );
          listImage.add( new ImageIcon(this.getClass().getResource("data/clouds0.jpg")).getImage() );
          listImage.add( new ImageIcon(this.getClass().getResource("data/cloud0.png")).getImage() );
          listImage.add( new ImageIcon(this.getClass().getResource("data/cloud1.png")).getImage() );
          listImage.add( new ImageIcon(this.getClass().getResource("data/cloud2.png")).getImage() );
          MediaTracker mt = new MediaTracker(this);
          for(int i=0; i<listImage.size(); i++){
               mt.addImage(listImage.get(i),0);
          try{
               mt.waitForAll();
          catch(Exception ex){
               ex.printStackTrace();
     public void update(Graphics g){
          this.paint(g);
     public static void main(String args[]){
          JFrame j = new JFrame();
          j.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
          j.setSize(1200,700);
          j.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
          main m = new main();
          m.loadImages();
          RobotValkyrieAttack r = new RobotValkyrieAttack(listImage);
          j.add(r);
          Thread t = new Thread(r);
          t.start();
          j.addKeyListener(r);
          main m = new main();
          m.init();
          j.add(m);
          j.setVisible(true);
}

Before we begin, note that performance of Java graphics has always been a bit 'hit and miss' in the sense that the same box with the same hardware and Java version can show radically different FPS rates if the video driver is updated.
For better help sooner, post an SSCCE.
Applet SSCCEs that involve images are a problem. Normally I would invite creators of image based SSCCEs to hot-link to [images available off my site|http://pscode.org/media/#image], but an applet cannot hot-link to images. It will be necessary to generate the images in code, if you want much chance of people running the code. Note that very few people will follow a link to anywhere, or download any 'build zip' or similar, to help out on a problem.
That code snippet as posted, had a number of things that seemed horrific.
- A class called 'main'. O_o Better would be AppletRenderTest which is not only more descriptive, but also uses the common nomenclature for a class name.
- Frame size 1200x700?! It pays to ensure any 'comparison' of applet and application is done at the same size and my screen size is 1024x768. Make it a lot smaller, like 800x600.
- A Swing based Timer is more typically used for Swing animation, than a Thread/Runnable.
- GUI construction should be done on the EDT.
- This..
//no JApplet constructor is allowed to be overrriden..is not only factually wrong, but also incorrectly spelt.
I am not confident you are up to writing:
- Test code (especially test code you intend others to help with)
- GUIs
- Animation code
- Applets
Or if you are capable of parts of that, of combining the 4.
Are you confident?

Hardware Accelerated Video Texture?

Considering how few folks are actually posting their questions here, I would hope this would be answered.
My question is regarding Hardware Accelerated Video Textures in Proscenium. Seeing how this API is being brought out by Adobe themselves and they have the ability to provide access to this feature, I'm curious why something like this has not been done?
The folks over at Away3D have detailed that they have also requested this support from Adobe but have not have any response from Adobe on this. This is pretty sad considering these guys actually develop this entire API on their own time with no financial support from Adobe.
Now that both Flash Player and AIR have been kicked in the teeth by the HTML5 / Javascript tidal wave, one would think Adobe would be paying attention to the developers who are still doing all they can with their technologies.
Hardware Accelerated Video Textures (H.264) in Proscenium (for web and mobile deployment) would be a great way to say to folks like me that you are still listening to the people using your tools.

Despite there being only a hand full of comments on the entire Proscenium board, it would appear that the Proscenium team doesn't have time to answer them.
In regards to this particular subject (that being hardware accelerated video textures) I don't think this is going to happen. I've personally spent the last year speaking to every person I could think of at Adobe, Away3D and even folks on the Proscenium team. The bottom line is that to do this Adobe must facilitate this capability. Away3D and other API providers cannot overcome the current obstacles to realize this feature. This all begins with Adobe providing access to these capabilities to the other API developers (Away3D).
When Proscenium first came on the scene, I immediately contacted the Proscenium team requesting this feature. I thought since Proscenium itself was being developed at Adobe, this features could be developed (at least as an experiment) more quickly. Alas no. I've gone so far as to contact several Adobe Evangelists telling them that the Away3D team would like access to this feature. Again, no. Just silence.
So, if want to create truly hardware accelerated video textures using a 3D API, forget it. (especially for mobile). Isn't going to happen. This is particularly true for iOS, where native H.264 support isn't supported on AIR.

Adobe Premiere Pro - Crashing with OpenCL Hardware Acceleration on Export

Hey everybody,
One of the major reasons I decided to buckle down and pay for PPCC was the OpenCL Hardware acceleration with AMD cards. I run two AMD Radeon 7870s in Crossfire right now, and I immediately noticed a huge difference in performance when editing. When it came time to export my video, though, Premiere Pro would crash after rendering around 2% of the full video. I've tried both with and without Crossfire activated but using OpenCL with Hardware acceleration crashed my export no matter what. As soon as I turned it back to regular Mercury Playback (software only), the project rendered just fine.
I currently have the lastest AMD drivers and have had no other issues with my card, and I also gave PPCC the latest update as well. Any idea why this might be happening? I wouldn't be surprised if I need to wait for a latest AMD driver in order to get things to work with the brand new CC apps, but I figured I'd farm my question out here just in case. I'm running on Windows 8 64 bit.

Yes. I have problems with my new AMD 1950 3GB. I creat 2h 20 min project on premiere cc and put on all material color correction. NO lumetri. Premiere crache on export about 1h after working.
I was editing AVCHD material and export from presets to Blu-Ray H264 and mpeg2 with the same result.
My conf.
Xeon E5-2620
Asus Z9PE-D8 WS
System&Apps disc: SSD vertex 3
Project: veloci raptor 250GB
Export: veloci raptor 250GB
RAM: 32 GB
Graf: radeon HD7950 3GB, Gigabyte
When I switch to my old card - nvidia - GTX470 everything just go fine and my export is finish perfectly.
I was using beta driver from amd 13.4.
It is confusing because I bought that card especially for Premiere CC, and I was thinking to bought second one, and maybe more...
Please help what can I do with it.
Sory for my english

I can only get dial up and need an accelerator.SlipStream is not compatible with 8.0.1.Any ideas? Thanks!

I'm in an area where I can only use dial up.Right now, I use Firefox version 3.6 and have no problems with SlipStream. SlipStream is an accelerator for dial up.I want to update to 8.0.1,but it doesn't appear to be compatible with SlipStream. My local tech support (Pennswoods) doesn't think it's compatible. The existing plugin doesn't work. Any ideas what I can use? Thank you for any info. (I'm not real great with computers)

Sorry, you are stuck with whatever version of Slipstream that your ISP has available. They should know which versions of Firefox are supported by their accelerator plugin, because your ISP is more than likely paying Slipstream for every update that is necessary. <br />
Have you asked your ISP which versions of Firefox are supported by their accelerator plugin?
Beyond that, the only thing that I can suggest is to see if the [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/ Addon Compatibility Reporter] extension forces that accelerator plugin work in Firefox 8, with the compatibility override. But, if that plugin hasn't been updated for a Firefox 4+ version at all, I doubt if it will work even with the ACR addon.

Pricing and licensing details for Migration accelerator

Could anyone please tell where can I find the pricing and licensing details for Microsoft Accelerator

Hi,
As per the document here, While in limited preview, Migration Accelerator is free and available only in North America. You pay only for any Azure services consumed.
As the service is in preview, we have very limited information about it.
Regards,
Shirisha Paderu

Cannot use bill pay on Bank of America App

When I try to use bill pay I get error message, "bank account is invalid or inactive." Why?? I use bill pay all the time on my desktop.

Clear the cache and the cookies from sites that cause problems.
"Clear the Cache":
*Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Cached Web Content: "Clear Now"
"Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
*Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Software Mode is Faster than GPU acceleration, WHY?!

I just built my first computer with an i7 4790k and geforce gtx 770 gb graphics card.
For some reason software only mode keeps coming out ahead by about 20% faster in
render and playback times.
Why would this happen!? Someone please explain.

Thanks for the quick reply Kevin.
I read over the article and tried a new clip with some of the effects listed for CUDA acceleration and it played back seamlessly and
rendered 20x as fast with the graphics card.
Would your best advice just be to pay attention to which effects I'm using to determine which MPE mode to use?
Do you think that with new Premiere CC updates, the graphics card will play a bigger and bigger role in playback and rendering?
I guess I'm just feeling like maybe I should have invested more in my CPU and waited on the graphics card.
What do you think?

BI Accelerator SAP Licensing

Hello all,
Just wondering if any of you can comment on this.
We've been looking into implementing the BI accelerator here and the quote we got from SAP is in the six figures for EACH blade we put in our system. In our case, since we were planning to go for 7 blades it brings our total close to a 7 figures number when including harware...
How have any of you been able to justify such costs? Even if we hired a person to take care of aggegates full-time we would be saving a whole bunch compared to the accelerator. I heard some of you have implemented 25 blades systems, did you really pay close to 3 millions for such a system (including hardware)?
I have some trouble understanding the business logic of selling a tool that fixes one of the major flaws of BI at such a steep price... In a sense we're getting an incomplete product and then are told that if we want it to be efficient, we need to cash out even more...
We're still on 3.5, the main objective of the upgrade for us was performance... But without BIA I wonder how much performance gain we'll actually get.
All comments welcome.
Eric

Hi Eric,
SAP NetWeaver BI Accelerator is priced per 16 GB memory increments. The price only applies to productive use of SAP NetWeaver BI Accelerator. There is no additional license for non-productive (development, test, and fail-over in stand-by mode only). A license charge does apply however in case that stand-by blades are also used to cover peaks in demand.
Due to the fact, that most of the currently used blades are 16 GB blades, it looks like the license is per blade. There is also an offering of 8 GB blades, where two blades fit into one license and in the future 32 GB blades will be supported as well.
The 8 GB offering is especially for smaller installations or for a start installation. Some of our HW partners also offer a test and buy approach, where you get the HW rolled into your DC for a testing period, if you are not fine with the results, you pay a fee and they take the HW back. Due to the free of charge of non productive installations on the software side, you start paying for BIA not before you put the BIA in production.
Going for the upgrade and then rechecking the BIA topic again is a valid approach, but there are some reasons why it could also be interesting to have a closer look on an upgrade together with BIA in one step. For Example: Different need of HW after the upgrade (so if you have to invest into new HW, the sizing could look different with BIA).
We are currently putting together a Value Calculator that shows all different areas where BIA could bring you cost savings or additional value. Based on that, it could get a little easier to bring together your business case. But for now, I wish you all the best with your upgrade and enough patience for your End-user.
Regards
Mathias

Opencl acceleration makes premiere crash

I was really excited about premiere pro since I installed the evaluation version a few days ago, but today I'm just disappointed in Adobe and here is why.
This week-end, I switched to mercury openCL accelerated rendering, only to find out that premiere would crash without any error message as soon as some video or picture is to be displayed. After hours of searching websites and forums for a solution, uninstalling and reinstalling my amd graphics driver, I finally tried to contact a adobe premiere expert by chat. The guy answered me right away: no chat or phone support for evaluation versions.
I can understand the decision not to spend work effort on non-paying maybe customers, but the more I think about it, the more it makes me wonder if Adobe really understands what an evaluation software is all about... namely convincing people to buy their stuff:
I, the customer, find a neat piece of software, start evaluating it in order to decide whether or not it is worth my money. Starting to understand how it works, I try to get the most performance out of it, switch a setting and find out that the product actually is quite unstable on my setup (which is far from being exotic). My positive feeling about the product starts to wobble, but since I am quite convinced I don't put it away without searching for a solution. Used to get my hands dirty when computer issues arise, I put a few hours of effort into finding a workaround. Without success. Taking a closer look at Adobes support service, my positive impression is back: I can contact a premiere expert by chat.
And here it comes, counterproductive and just so... let's say it, stupid: Unfortunately, we don't provide chat or phone support to evaluation version users.
Come on, that can't be serious? I'm evaluating this software, and they make me understand: oh, it does not work? well, buy it, and then maybe we will make it work for you!
I love software business... It tries to make people accept the unacceptable. Imagine looking for a sports car. You find a very nice one which has a city mode which limits the engine to 50HP, and a much more exciting sports mode which unleashes all the 450HP it packs. They let you take a ride, you fall in love with the car, think about buying it for real. You want of course to know exactly what you're buying. Unfortunately, when switching from city mode to sports mode, the engine stops. Ok, bad impression... but you like the car and give them a second chance: you ask the dealer to check it out, so that you can try the other mode. How would you react to the dealer answering you: No, if you want to see what it's like, you must buy it first.
What the hell?! Who would not just walk away?
And here, I am supposed to pay for a piece of software that does not run properly on my PC?
How ... disappointing!

Hello Vinay,
Thank you for your answer.
I updated my version of permiere to 7.2.2 (33) today, unfortunately it still crashes as soon as opencl acceleration is activated.
My operating system is windows 8.1
I have 2 amd graphic cards in my rig:
R9 280x
HD5870
When I select mercury opencl, premiere crashes as soon as anything has to be displayed. It is independent of the type of material (pictures or videos) I browse in the media explorer and display in the source window. It crashes also as soon as I play the timeline, whether there are effects or not.
The videos and pictures I'm processing are all taken with a gopro hero3 and a galaxy note 3.
Regards,
Severin

Does anyone know if I would have to pay to upgrade OS X Lion to the OS X Mountain Lion?

Hey, I am looking at buying a Mac Pro but have just seen thaat Apple has a new OS X Mountain Lion coming out htis winter.... Does Anyone know if I would have to pay to upgrade from OS X Lion to the OS X Mountain Lion? Sorry this will be my first Mac and I would like to buy it with the latest OS. I would hate to buy now then a newer OS comes out... Can anyone help?

Well, as both hardware and software seem to be on an accelerating schedule of renewals, you might never buy a mac on that philosophy!
Apple normally offer a period of grace if an new OS comes out a month or so after a new purchase (i.e., you can get a free upgrade), but longer than that an you have to pay.
Of course, there's no compulsion to upgrade to the new OS just because it exists. Plenty of people are still running Leopard 10.5.8.

My iPhone wont let me download some apps that i have payed for on on my account; it says my iPhone is not authorized for this computer, but it is.

My iPhone wont let me download some apps that i have payed for on on my account; it says my iPhone is not authorized for this computer, but it is.

No, iTunes never says an iPhone is not authorized.
This is occurring on a computer, correct?
Is the computer authorized for the account the media or apps were acquired with?

How long does it take for the warehouse to show a phone as recieved so I can pay my final bill? I would like to sign up for Verizon again as I am very unsatisfied with my new company but cannot until this is resolved.

I recently switched to another competitor but would actually like to start from scratch with Verizon but cannot do so because they cannot locate my devices I mailed in to their warehouse. I switched my whole family's accounts, 3 phones and 1 mobile hotspot, to a competitor to get a cheaper rate and unlimited data but I have not been happy with their service and would like to switch back. The problem is when switching the first time I was told by a Verizon chat rep that I could send my Edge devices back in and would get credit for them and stop my edge payments which was not the way I know now it is supposed to work. After a couple of phone calls a supervisor looked at my online chat transcript and realized that I was correct and the rep had told me incorrectly that they would take my edge phones back and give me credit for them and I could close my account by only paying the early termination fees. She sent me two envelopes to send my two edge phones back in and said they would credit on my account and stop the monthly billing for them once they were received. I called a couple of weeks ago after being charged 24.99 for the both of them again for the month after my account was stopped. They said that they had not received my phones and I should have noted the tracking number from the labels the rep sent me so they could track them. I tried to find the tracking numbers but couldn't so I got back on live chat and asked them to resend me the letter from the supervisor rep as well as resending the labels and he said they could that and it should be 7-10 business days. It has now been over two weeks and I have not received the resent letter or labels so I cannot give them the tracking number to prove I sent my phones back to them. I have also researched the facility I was asked to send these phones back to and it seems this is a pretty common Verizon trick of making you prove you sent the phones and not giving you any access to the tracking numbers. I just want to pay my ETF's and close out my original account so I can start over fresh with Verizon but now I am losing faith in doing that as this is making me wonder if they are the type of company I want to deal with. Please someone who may have dealt with this help me restore my faith in Verizon and give me an idea of what to do next.

How recently did you switch? If it's less than 60 days, then Verizon simply reinstates your previous account. The fact that you were on the EDGE plan and mailed the devices back, and they apparently are somewhere in the system, could cause complications, and it might just work out that you just go back on the same plan and they set you up with the same devices. I'm not sure how it will go - but since you are still being billed for the devices...

Accelerated Pay

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for