Accelerating Compressor with NVIDIA GTX 285 or GT 120?

Is there any way to accelerate Compressor using OpenCL with NVIDIA GTX 285 or GT 120? Plans to do this?

RedTruck wrote:
the standard? really…?
Yes. Every consumer camcorder that we sell at my camera shop records to AVCHD. Every Blu Ray player sold at WalMart, Best Buy, Target, etc. etc. etc. etc. uses AVCHD. It's the standard. Period.
Apple needs to get with the times! Sorry, but it's the truth. I'm not denigrating Apple, but they are living in a false reality if they think that AVCHD/Blu Ray is not the standard now, or that it's just going to go away because they refuse to acknowledge it or incorporate it into their products.
The assumption for many years has been that if you had a video camera, you should buy a Mac and it will be able to edit your videos right out of the box and burn them to a disc for playback on your computer. But it's simply not the case anymore.
I have customers come to my store and purchase AVCHD camcorders, and I got really tired of having to explain to people who came back with patches of hair missing where they pulled it out, that, "Sorry the Mac does not support the current HD standard."
"Huh? What?"
"That's right, it does not support AVCHD playback nor does it support Blu Ray."
"Really? Why?"
"I don't know."
"OK, well, what am I supposed to do? I just want to copy HD files to my Mac from off my camcorder and watch them."
"Sorry, not possible. Well, you could try VLC... but it will be choppy and horrific, unless you can somehow decipher its arcane preferences and get it to play those files back smooth, but I've been doing this for 20 years and I have no clue how to make VLC work for smooth AVCHD playback on a newer model iMac."
"OK.. well, how do I get them burned to disc?"
"Well, you could import them into iMovie, which requires transcoding the video into a much, much larger format, that takes a lot of time --"
"-- but wait, I bought a flash memory camcorder because I wanted to avoid the long camera to computer transfer times that plagued my life with a tape-based camcorder. But you're telling me now I have to wait hours and hours to capture my 120gb hard drive full of AVCHD video to my Mac in HD?"
"Yes, that's correct. Oh, and if you want to burn it to AVCHD/Blu Ray, you'll have to buy Toast and an external Blu Ray burner. That'll run you about.. $400. Oh, and when you do this, it will have to re-encode the video back into AVCHD, which will take *at least as long* as when you captured it in iMovie in the first place. And that 120GB of video is going to require... a LOT more than 120GB to store on your computer."
"$400?! I thought Mac came with the latest technology and supported the latest standards! More than 120GB? What the heck, why?"
"I'm sorry, but Apple transcodes it out of its native format, into some intermediary codec that eats up exponentially more space."
"Why the heck do they do that?"
"I don't know. Adobe Premiere Elements is the only consumer editing package that supports AVCHD natively, yet it only runs on PC. You could buy Premiere Pro CS4 but .. don't ask the price of that. Look, I don't know what to tell you. Buy Windows, install it, buy Premiere Elements, install that, and then buy Roxio Creator 2010 Pro, to burn your Blu Rays, and buy an external Blu Ray burner."
"Or just buy a PC that ships with Blu Ray?"
"**** no. Just wait.. until some undetermined future time.. when Apple finally decides to get with the times... <<sigh>>"
Anyway look. Currently Mac doesn't support the latest standards. I frequently have customers come to my camera shop, which is in the same mall as an Apple store, and I've had this conversation over, and over, and over again.
Anyone who disagrees that AVCHD is the standard needs to consider the fact that they are totally wrong.
Message was edited by: DaddieMac

Similar Messages

  • Accelerating Video Compression w/NVIDIA GTX 285, Mac Pro?

    I want to harness the powarrr of the 8 cores and NVIDIA GTX 285 to transcode video to and from various formats. But I don't see OpenCL support listed for Final Cut 7's Compressor. I don't see any mention that Adobe Media Encoder CS4 is accelerated by such GPUs. I'm trying out Toast right now and it's using less than two cores, and going kinda slow (not booted into Snow Leopard at the moment tho).
    So the question is, how can I take advantage of the extra power of the GTX 285 for encoding? I know that Qmaster and Compressor will take advantage of the extra cores... but I want to use the FULL power of this battlestation.
    Thanks for any tips

    Optimize performance in Photoshop CS4 on Mac OS
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404440.html
    http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2008/10/adobe-cs4-review.ars/4
    GPU and OpenGL Features and Limitations in Photoshop CS4
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/productquadro_cxus.html

  • NVIDIA GTX 285 or FX 4800?

    I'm using CS4 Premiere Pro. My camcorder uses AVCHD and I wanted to speed up the rendering and encoding of the video files. I have multiple monitors so I would need two of them. Would you rather go with two GTX 285 or two FX 4800 in SLI mode considering cost is no factor? I keep hearing that the GTX would work but NVIDIA says the FX would be way faster for H.264 and MPEG2. Sometimes it's hard to believe the manufacture since they are just trying to sell you the more expensive card. Is the FX card way faster for this type of work?

    I have 4 monitors so that's why I wanted two video cards. Since I'll be running two I was thinking of going SLI for extra power only when doing video editing. I mainly work with 1080 high def files.
    This is my setup.
    Windows 7 Ultimate
    i7 965
    12GB memory
    Two 120GB SSD RAID 0
    Five 2TB WD HDs RAID 10
    1000w PS
    Blu-Ray burner

  • Possible to Use Radeon 4870 AND EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285 at the Same Time?

    Hello,
    I just tried to connect a second 30 inch Cinema display to my early 2009 8-core MacPro with a Radeon 4870 card.
    The second display maxes out at 1280 x 800 resolution.
    I think that is a function of the second port on the 4870, rather than a limitation of the card itself.
    To get around this, I ordered the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285. At $499, that's a big yikes.
    Here is my question: Will I get better performance running one 30 inch from the Radeon, and the second from the Nvidia? Can I even install both at the same time? Or should I remove the Radeon and use just the Nvidia?
    FWIW, I use this Mac for Photoshop and other image software, and for some stats work. No games. I am using CS4, which would never recognize my 4870. Maybe I will do better with the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285?
    I would appreciate any and all help on this!
    Thanks!
    Charles

    I just tried to connect a second 30 inch Cinema display to my early 2009 8-core MacPro with a Radeon 4870 card.
    Are you using the Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI Adapter?
    <http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB571Z/A?fnode=MTY1NDA5OQ&mco=MjkyNjI0Mg>
    The second display maxes out at 1280 x 800 resolution.
    That's the resolution the 30" will run at with a single-link DVI connection.
    I think that is a function of the second port on the 4870, rather than a limitation of the card itself.
    It depends on the adapter you use.
    To get around this, I ordered the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285. At $499, that's a big yikes.
    It has twice the graphics memory, so may be better if you are processing lots of large images at once.
    Here is my question: Will I get better performance running one 30 inch from the Radeon, and the second from the NVIDIA?
    No. For only two displays, one card is better because it can handle moving windows between displays, or windows spanning both displays. With the displays on different cards, the main computer has to do more work. Even if the windows are never going to cross display boundaries, there is no way for the applications to know that, so they won't let the graphics cards do as much as they could.
    Can I even install both at the same time?
    No. There are only two auxiliary power connectors, and one card will use both.
    Or should I remove the Radeon and use just the NVIDIA?
    Try each card and see which gives the best results with your applications.
    FWIW, I use this Mac for Photoshop and other image software, and for some stats work. No games. I am using CS4, which would never recognize my 4870. Maybe I will do better with the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285?
    The extra video RAM may give better performance with lors of large images.

  • Best brand of nVidia GTX 285 card?

    Now that I've changed my mind, and decided to get ready to someday buy an HD camcorder, I'm looking at the various brands of nVidia GTX 285 cards to use with CS5... with prices ranging from $370 to $450
    The top brands seem to be EVGA $390-$430 and BFG $370-$400 and XFX $390-$450 and GIGABYTE $370 @Newegg
    Is one of these brands better than the others?
    Note that I do NOT believe in over-clocking, so I am ONLY going to consider a brand + model that uses the standard clock speed as specified on the nVidia web site

    brand is unimportant to a point
    look at GHz and memory speeds some sell factory OCed
    also warranty. some have lifetime, if i recall BFG, XFX and EVGA?
    i prefer Zotac as they tend to be faster for less.
    Scott
    ADK

  • Hot Debut ! MSI 2014Gaming Laptopsfeature with Nvidia GTX 800M series GPU

    MSI's gaming laptop now delivers the brand new models with latest Nvidia GTX 800M family which are more powerful and boost amazing performance of the latest gaming laptops. Under the hood, featuring the Intel 4th generation Quad Core processors and NVIDIAGeForceGTX 880M, GTX 870M GTX860M and GTX850M discrete graphics,while tipping the scales at 15.6 inch to 17 inch respectively. These gaming NBs meetgamers’ need for machines that are both lean and mean. In addition, they sport the best SteelSeries gaming keyboards with multi colorbacklit only on MSI gaming notebooks, the killer networking feature to boost the internet efficiency, new authentic Sound by Dynaudio speakers system, and XSplit Gamecaster pre-installed with a 6 month premium license for gameplay streaming MSI’s own Audio Boostheadsets sound enhancement solution. Light and powerful, these NBs will give you the furious advantage in Full HD gaming competitions.
    The most wanted exclusive features at 2014 MSI gaming laptops
    [TABLE=width: 500]
    [TR]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    Exclusive featuring the Steelseries keyboard and Steelseries Engine
    Exclusive featuring the best live streaming application Xsplit Gamecaster
    Exclusive equips the Super Raid 2 technology
    The world 1st leading gaming brand builds in the Killer Doubleshoot technology
    Exclusive and fine tune the sound system by Dynaudio
    Exclusive Matrix Display technology for multiple external monitor output
    The new GT series – Dominate the cyber battlefield
    Featuring NVIDIA’s latest GeForce GTX880M (Dominator Pro) and GTX870M (Dominator) graphics, the new GT70 can give the users a superior extreme gaming experience on the top-end performance platform. It provides gaming performance at "the speed of light" and with incredible resolution. And it boasts more than 15% better performance on 3D Mark 11 standard tests over similar level gaming computers of the previous generation of, like the GTX780M and GTX770M. The unique gamer oriented features design, record-shattering performance, and innovative gaming experience of MSI's gaming laptops are steadily winning over extreme gamers around the world during 2013.
    [TABLE=width: 500, align: center]
    [TR]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    New GS series - The Ghost killer, weapon of Stealth
    The MSI engineer refines every detailed material and component to increase the performance to the limit and stay true to portability. The MSI GS Stealth and Ghost series packs Intel core i7-4700HQ, graphics powered by NvidiaGeforce GTX870M and designed at only 19.9mm thin and weighing 1.9kgw(GS Ghost). Performance in 3D mark11 test can reach 20% more than previous generation GPU.
    [TABLE=width: 500, align: center]
    [TR]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    ThegroundbreakingGE Apache Pro series
    They feature Intel’s 4thGen.Quad Core processor and new generation NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and GTX 860M discrete graphics, and its performance is over 20% to 35% faster than GTX 770M and GT 765M graphics. GE Apacheseries are the portable and powerful battle laptops on the gaming field todaywhile weighing in at only 2.55(GE60 Apache) and 2.85(GE70 Apache) kilograms respectively, and are specially designed to meet the higher demands of heavy loading gamers around the world.
    [TABLE=width: 500, align: center]
    [TR]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    The faster and furious GP Leopard series for popular online games
    They featured Intel’s 4th Generation Quad Core processor and new Generation NVIDIA GeForce 840M discrete graphics. Specially designed to meet the demands of online gamers around the world. With the 22nm production technology, the Nvidia GeForce 840M performs over 2500 points on 3Dmark 11(P) and increases overall performance by 25% over GeForce GT 740M.That coupled with the fact that it supports DirectX 11 effects and NVIDIA PhysX technologies. You will be amazed by the smooth gaming experience of your favor online games on HD to Full HD resolutions, GP Leopard series is your easy to take and best companion anywhere.
    [TABLE=width: 500, align: center]
    [TR]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]

    I made a thread, but it has not been approved by a moderator yet, so I will ask the question in here since the topic is relevant.
    The GS Stealth in this topic is the same as the one MSI revealed at CES 2014.
    But what is GS 70 Stealth and GS 70 Stealth Pro on the website?
    And which one is the GS 70 Stealth that was released just a few days ago?
    I am just confused as to the naming of this particular series.
    I am looking for the GS Stealth that is the one in this topic above, but there seems to be so many versions of it and some are called 70.
    Can someone explain what is what?
    EDIT:
    nevermind, I figured it out through extensive searching on various forums.
    The new Stealth is called GS70 StealthPro-024 or GS70 StealthPro-001 in case anyone wonders.

  • Qosmio X500 - New models with nVidia GTX 460/470M?

    Hi,
    It seems that all Qosmio laptops have sold out in the UK aprt from X500-P13. Are Toshiba planning to ship any Qosmio X500-134 to resellers or are they planning to produce new Qosmios with the NVIDIA GTX 460/470M?
    Also, why are the Qosmios not available in shops?
    Thanks

    Hi buddy,
    I think nobody here can give a 100% answer because its user forum only.
    At the moment Qosmio X500 will be delivered with GeForce GTS 250M or 360M graphic card, depending on the model.
    So at the moment I cant find any information about new nVidia graphic cards on Toshiba website. So either it will be equipped with new cards or we must wait for a newer model.

  • Cuda is not working in CS6 with MacOs Mavericks, nvidia gtx 285

    Will it be fixed? By whom? Apple, Adobe, Nvidia?

    Hi,
    I'll think it will be not fixed. But...
    ... take a look here
    http://www.studio1productions.com/Articles/PremiereCS5.htm
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/3936695#3936695
    http://www.vidmuze.com/how-to-enable-gpu-cuda-in-adobe-cs6-for-mac/
    Regards
    Axel

  • Open Gl Issue with Nvidia GTX 460 & Photoshop cs5

    open gl has become disabled and preferences window doesn't show the detected video. card cache level is set to 4. help>system info still shows the card and drivers but I can't use any of the open gl features. I have already downloaded installed the latest drivers so Im not so sure that that would be the problem.
    I know my graphics card supports it because I was using the rotate tool on this same document yesterday. How ever when i started it up today It no longer worked. I haven't installed anything since I used the rotate tool last (except for the latest drivers for my nvideo geforce gtx 460 gfx card, how ever this was an attempt to fix the problem)
    I tried running the 64 bit verision of Ps but the results were the same.
    My system is running
    windows 7 64 bit
    Intel core 2 duo 3.0 Ghz (dual core processor)
    8 GB ddr2 ram
    Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
    (with 2 identical moniters connected via dvi)
    Adobe Creative Suite CS5 Design Premium
    Wacom Bamboo pen and touch w/ matching drivers
    Belkin N52TE gaming pad with photoshop short cuts mapped to it.
    Im not sure what else I can list that might be related
    I made no system changes since the last time i ran photoshop.
    I unplugged the wacom tablet for 5 minutes last night in order to install the drivers on another computer and when it was done i moved it back (Im fairly sure this couldn't have caused it but better to give all the info i guess...)
    I would greatly apreciate any help you might be able to offer.

    some one i know suggested that I try an older driver in case it was a bug with the latest one. I did so and once again It worked untill i closed photoshop. I closed and reopened the program to test it and sure enough when i reopened it all open gl functionality was gone once again. I don't believe nvidia drivers are the problem because i have tried 3 different version with the same results. each one works untill i close photoshop and the second time i open photoshop it quits working.
    do any of you at adobe have any idea what might be causing this?

  • [solved-ish]hardware / 3D acceleration problems with Nvidia drivers

    Hi,
    I am getting really slow response with 3d applications. I just tried glxgears and am not getting any more than 3 fps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Any ideas would be appreciated.
    xorg.conf
    # nvidia-settings: X configuration file generated by nvidia-settings
    # nvidia-settings: version 1.0 (buildmeister@builder63) Fri Aug 14 17:55:55 PDT 2009
    # nvidia-xconfig: X configuration file generated by nvidia-xconfig
    # nvidia-xconfig: version 1.0 (buildmeister@builder63) Fri Aug 14 17:54:58 PDT 2009
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "Layout0"
    Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    EndSection
    Section "ServerFlags"
    Option "Xinerama" "0"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    # generated from default
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
    Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    # generated from default
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Unknown"
    ModelName "NCI NEC CI A727"
    HorizSync 30.0 - 70.0
    VertRefresh 50.0 - 150.0
    Option "DPMS"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor1"
    VendorName "Unknown"
    ModelName "TV-0"
    HorizSync 28.0 - 55.0
    VertRefresh 43.0 - 72.0
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Device0"
    Driver "nvidia"
    VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
    BoardName "GeForce 6200"
    Option "RenderAccel" "True"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Device1"
    Driver "nvidia"
    VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
    BoardName "GeForce 6200"
    BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
    Screen 1
    Option "RenderAccel" "True"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    # Removed Option "metamodes" "1280x1024_60 +0+0"
    # Removed Option "metamodes" "CRT: 1280x1024_60 +0+0"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Device0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    DefaultDepth 24
    Option "TwinView" "0"
    Option "TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder" "CRT-0"
    Option "metamodes" "1280x1024_60 +0+0"
    SubSection "Display"
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    # Removed Option "metamodes" "TV: 720x480 +0+0"
    Identifier "Screen1"
    Device "Device1"
    Monitor "Monitor1"
    DefaultDepth 16
    Option "TwinView" "0"
    Option "metamodes" "TV: 720x480 +0+0; TV: 640x480 +0+0"
    SubSection "Display"
    Depth 16
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    I thought this was originally a separate issue to nvidia, original post http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 47#p690547
    Last edited by ninjaprawn (2010-02-14 00:56:16)

    Vegita wrote:What I did with my install was (as root):
    Xorg -configure
    then     cp xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf
    and after this I used nvidia-xconfig utility! I did it the same way on many other distros even. And for the very last: try with one nvidia card only.
    followed this to a 't' as below;
    Xorg -configure
    cp xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf
    nvidia-xconfig
    and it produced the following xorg.conf;
    # nvidia-xconfig: X configuration file generated by nvidia-xconfig
    # nvidia-xconfig: version 1.0 (buildmeister@builder75) Tue Dec 8 21:04:28 PST 2009
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "X.org Configured"
    Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "dri2"
    Load "dbe"
    Load "extmod"
    Load "glx"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName "Monitor Model"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "nvidia"
    VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
    BoardName "NV44A [GeForce 6200]"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Card0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 4
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 8
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 15
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 16
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "Extensions"
    Option "Composite" "Enable"
    EndSection
    which then  produced the following from glxgears;
    [user@ArchLinux ~]$ glxgears
    Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
    approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
    17 frames in 5.2 seconds = 3.271 FPS
    16 frames in 5.1 seconds = 3.132 FPS
    9 frames in 5.2 seconds = 1.745 FPS
    8 frames in 5.1 seconds = 1.575 FPS
    9 frames in 5.5 seconds = 1.623 FPS
    XIO: fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server ":0.0"
    after 46 requests (45 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
    [user@ArchLinux ~]$

  • Nvidia GTX 285 - Mini-display port version?

    Hello,
    Does anyone know if Apple will ask Nvidia to bring out a similar card except to support those who have the new 24 inch cinema display?

    I want to connect two monitors external 1920/1080 LCD to my MacBook Pro
    There is no APPLE adapter that will do that.
    There are third-party solutions like this one from OWC

  • Can't Safe Boot with 10.6.2 and GTX 285

    Can't safe boot with 10.6.2 and NVIDIA GTX 285 (2009 Mac Pro).
    What the heck am I supposed to do, take out the graphics card every time I want to safe boot?!
    Suggestions please!

    No, I think what it is, is that the GTX 285 drivers somehow are being treated as 3rd party extensions not to be loaded on a safe boot, but the problem is that without those drivers, even if I switch my monitor over to my GT 120 card, it still won't boot. Ugh.
    I am considering reinstalling 10.6 over on top of my current system, then putting the 10.6.2 on top of that. If I do this, do I risk losing any preferences or having to reinstall any 3rd-party software? At this point, I'll happily reinstall whatever it takes... I just didn't want to have to do a clean system where I have to track down every single bookmark file and saved preference for my main apps, but it could be this is now starting to take more time than it simply would have to do that from the get-go. Sigh.

  • Black Screen (source and preview) when using GPU acceleration (CUDA) [NVidia GTX 780M]

    Hi guys!
    I am running Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 on Windows 7 (Ult) on a machine equipped with NVidia GTX 780M (4 GB VRAM) graphics card. The source and the preview monitors are both black if I select GPU accelerated rendering. There is a yellow bar above the timeline clips, I can hear the sound tracks, but there is no image. If I choose the Software Only rendering (CPU) then I do see the image as well, but the real-time playback and rendering times are awful!
    At first, the application would not allow me to use the GPU acceleration using NVidia’s CUDA processing. Once I entered my video card name in the “cuda_supported_cards.txt” file in the Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 folder I was able to choose between Mercury Playback Engine Software Only and Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration CUDA.
    I tried downgrading the video card driver to the previous stable version and reinstall Pr – no go. How do I make Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 work with my NVidia GTX 780M video card?
    Your insight is appreciated!
    P.S. I used to work on a different machine equipped with NVidia GTX 670M card (which is also missing from the officially supported Pr CS6 cards list) and I never had any issues of this nature with that laptop.

    Hi there,
    As stated before, I had the same problem. Apparantly the solution for me was to check the Nvidia settings. My setup has both an onboard GPU and a Nvidia GPU (on purpose specifically for video editing and gaming). Normally the system should switch to Nvidia automatically. However, the Nvidia settings for Premiere where set to favor the onboard GPU. After changing this. everything works fine again!
    kind regards. Bart

  • Help! PrPro 5.5.2 and nVidia 285.62 on GTX 285

    Ok, I had posted about this about a month ago over in the main forum, and thought I had solved the problem, but it's back. Unfortunately I can't find my original post to resurrect it, as Jive seems to have wiped my post history beyond two weeks ago... :-(
    Anyway, I bought PrPro 5.5 to work with RED Epic footage, and installed it alongside my 5.0.3 on Win 7x64 Ultimate. I ran all updates (5.5.2), and then on my first startup got the message that I wouldn't have CUDA support since there was no CUDA enabled card installed. I knew that wasn't right cause I used CUDA all the time in 5.0.3, so I checked and found my drivers were significantly out of date. I updated my nVidia drivers from nVidia's site, rebooted, and relaunched PrPro. Everything worked great. Until I had to export my first video. During export I consistently got an nVidia driver error, saying that my system resources didn't match what was required by the program (something about it couldn't get small enough packages for the video card to process), and it had to close. Closing the nVidia driver error box also force quit PrPro. I discovered that by running without CUDA I had no issues and could successfully export my video. However, I can't afford the time to run without CUDA as it significantly speeds up the processing time, especially with multiple layers of Epic footage.
    So ultimately I did a complete wipe and reinstall of the entire system, starting with the most recent non-beta drivers available for the nVidia card, and put only 5.5 on the system and fully updated to 5.5.2. It recognized my CUDA card and there were no issues. I've worked off and on (very light work over Christmas) until today when I dug back into my big Epic project and started doing some basic scaling and speed adjustments on some clips, and some primary CC with the RGB CC and Three-Way CC. I frequently get the same nVidia error message that I had gotten before I did the wipe and re-install, and it's killing my workflow and productivity. I turned CUDA back off again this afternoon to get this one timeline finished and exported, but I really need it back.
    What changed about CUDA support between 5.0.3 and 5.5.2 that has screwed things up with my GTX 285? And what do I need to do to fix things and get them back up and running? Before the wipe and reinstall I had tried multiple versions of the nVidia drivers, incluidng rolling back as far as I could go and keep CUDA support, and the new beta drivers that Ann and others had recommended. Unfortunately purchasing a newer graphics card probably isn't an option since I've already spent over $2300 in the last couple months on hardware and software upgrades.
    As a refresher, my other system specs are as follows:
    Intel Core i7-920 2.67GHz (no overclock)
    12GB RAM
    250GB SATA OS/Programs
    500GB SATA Graphics/Pictures/Other stuff/Pagefile
    3-disk SATA RAID-5 2TB Video Project Files
    4-disk SATA RAID-5 8TB Video Data Files (PCIe RAID card)
    1TB SATA Video Export/Encore Project files
    4TB eSATA Data Backup (not currently in use)
    400GB eSATA Project Backup (not currently in use)
    Here is the additional spec information from my GTX285 card, pulled from the nVidia system information dialog:
    Driver version: 285.62
    DirectX Support: 10
    DirectX Runtime Version: 11
    CUDA Cores: 240
    Graphics Clock: 648 MHz
    Processor Clock: 1476MHz
    Memory Clock 1242MHz (2484 MHz data rate)
    Memory interface: 512-bit
    Total available graphics memory: 4095MB
    Dedicated video memory: 1024MB GDDR3
    System video memory: 0MB
    Shared system memory: 3071MB
    Video BIOS version: 62.0.58.00.03
    IRQ: 30
    BUS: PCI Express x16 Gen2

    Ok.... I just turned CUDA back on and ran it as hard as I could (Secondary CC, etc.) to make it crash again. Here's the screenshot of the error message:
    And here's the detailed info from the nVidia page referenced in the error message:
    OpenGL message "hardware does not meet minimum specifications"
    I have seen this Event Log Message:
    Your hardware configuration does not meet minimum specifications needed to run the application. The application must close.
    What does it mean?
    The most common cause for this issue is that the application was unable to continue due to hardware limitations. The workload the application sent to the Graphics Card could not be broken into small enough pieces to be processed.
    How can this be fixed?
    Verify you are running the most recent driver for your application. Drivers certified by Professional Software vendors can be found herehttp://www.nvidia.com/page/partner_certified_drivers.html. If you application is not listed, install the most recent driver for your graphics board from www.nvidia.com/drivers. You should also check with your application provider for any updates or patches to your application.
    You can also try manipulating a smaller image as you may be running out of video memory with extremely large images.  If none of these work, you likely need a more powerful Graphics Card to handle this application.
    If you are certain that your graphics card meets the application hardware requirements and none of the above suggestions solve the problem, please file a support request here by clicking on "Ask a Question" near the top of this page. Please make sure to correct enter the operating system, the NVIDIA driver version, the application name and version, graphics board maker and model, along with the steps which were taken to make this issue appear.
    Also, I've noticed that it generally happens ONLY after PrPro has eaten up more than 4GB of system memory (PrPro memory configuration is set to Performance and to allow PrPro access to 8GB of my 12GB of system memory):
    Does this info help anyone at all?

  • Radeon 2600 vs GTX 285

    I have an early 2008 Mac Pro with the ATI Radeon 2600. I recently installed Windows 7 and was looking to upgrade my graphics card to whatever is currently the best available now that I have access to Windows games. Scanning the forum I see the NVIDIA GTX 285 and the ATI Radeon 4870 seem to be the most popular cards. Other than price, is there any reason to choose one over the other?
    Thanks.
    Message was edited by: bankergrahams

    GTX 285 better gaming in windows.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to move up within a URL path?

    Recently started using URLs in my programs. Works great. However, all the time I have been wondering how to move up in that URL path. For example, if my url1=("http://www.something.com/") I normally end up at the index.html. But how could one set up

  • VA01 adding new fields in the popup bot aht display a customers contract

    Hi, I need to add 3 extra fields in the popup box that appears showing a customers open contracts, to see the popup do VA01 -> enter the data below on the first screen.        Order Type: OR                                                            

  • How to set a new email account for iCloud?

    How set a new email account for iCloud?

  • Macbook Pro Screen Quality

    I upgraded my notebook from an ibook G4 to a Macbook Pro last August. I have been an apple user for more than 5 years now and love my macbook but recently I noticed a small, superbright pixel on the bottem left side of my screen. I just noticed this

  • Data Aging design

    Hi This may be one for the gurus, or they're could be a standard way to do it. I'm looking for some help in designing a database. The problem I have is related to data aging on Oracle instances. I can't find any help on it. The problem I have is that