Accent issue when upgrading Uccx 7 to 9

Hi guys,
i would like to know if theres an issue with accentuated character in the script name, username and prompt name when you upgrade from 7.0 to 9.0
thanks,
Eric D.

> When I run with trace on, I see the following error in trace.
> Sep 22, 2011 4:59:11 PM [Info ]: Service "StorageService" started.
> Sep 25, 2011 5:48:37 PM [Info ]: Starting service "StorageService" ...
> Sep 25, 2011 5:48:37 PM [Error ]: java.io.EOFException: null
> Sep 25, 2011 5:48:38 PM [Error ]: java.io.EOFException: null
I suggest some files got corrupted.
I would start over.
Markus

Similar Messages

Solution Manager ChaRM Issues when Upgrading Satellite System

When upgrading a satellite system that is connected to Solution Manager's Change Request Management, is there anything that we need to be aware of?
Will Change Documents still be able to go to completion (Production status) if we modify the landscape from the time the Change Document is In Development to the time it is moved to Production?
1. Normal Correction (In Development) Development (ECC 5.0) -> Quality (ECC 5.0) -> Production (ECC 5.0)
2. Landscape is changed to Development (ECC 6.0) -> Quality (ECC 6.0) -> Production (ECC 5.0)
3. Normal Correction moved to To Be Tested -> Consolidated -> Production
Will the Normal Correction be in error because the landscape changed for the iBASE?
Are there any other lessons learned that anyone has experienced with Change Request Management or Implementation during and after an upgrade?
Thank You,
Carlen
Edited by: Carlen Yuen on Jan 13, 2009 1:50 AM
Edited by: Carlen Yuen on Jan 13, 2009 1:51 AM

Thanks Subhashini!
We had issues updating the Task List in the past. After we update the landscape and refresh the project and update the Task List, do you foresee any other problems?
Are there any additional items we should look out for? For example, we understand it is a requirement to release all transports prior to beginning the upgrade. However, since the release of the transport locks the change into the cycle for the next production move, this will present a problem if the change is not yet ready to be moved into Production. Do you have any further insight to any additional issues such as this?
Thanks again!
Carlen

Abap issues when upgrading from 4.7 to ecc6.0

hello All,
I am posting this question with intention of general issues we face that are abap related when upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6.0,
do the programs ahve to be adjusted, if sumone cud also throw some light on what is unicode and wat role does it play in the upgrade,
some specific examples wud be appreciated
thanks,
RS

hi,
Go through this
Unicode is an international standard that assigns characters from virtually every
language and script a unique Unicode Scalar Value, which is a number written in
hexadecimal notation.
     Character     Unicode Scalar Value     Unicode Character Name
     A      U+0041          LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A
     Ä     U+00C4          LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS
     α     U+03B1          GREEK SMALL LATTER ALPHA
Implementing the Unicode standard enables a single software product or a single
web site to be accessed across multiple platforms, languages, and countries without
the need for re-engineering. It allows data to be transferred across many different
SAP and non-SAP systems without corruption. To meet these requirements, the SAP
Unicode team continues to promote Unicode-enabled SAP systems, aid their
installation, and provide tools and full technical support for the smooth
conversion of existing SAP non-Unicode systems to Unicode.

Preformance issues when upgrading from dbxml 2.3.8 to 2.4.13

I have recently upgraded my dbxml distribution from 2.3.8 to 2.4.13 (including the latest patch). I have noticed that many of the queries I issue take longer than they used to. Specifically if the query is complex it takes 10 times as long as it did with 2.3.8. Also I have noted a difference in speed between issuing the query via the dbxml shell (query takes ~45 seconds) vs issuing it through a c++ interface (query takes 4+ minutes). The query am issuing is:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
if I simplify the query by removing references to the obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high nodes:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
it returns much faster. I am wondering if this is an issue with optimization of the complex query?
The database is fully indexed and was re-indexed when I upgraded to 2.4.13

Doug,
I've got your container. It's a wholedoc container with document indexes (a lot of them). Here's what I see for query speeds for your large, slow query using the dbxml shell.
Query is:
query "for $i in collection('pdb.dbxml')/project where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test'] return $i"
2.3.11 -- 2.4 seconds
2.4.13 -- 60 seconds
That is a significant slowdown and it needs further investigation but is almost certainly related to the fact that it is wholedoc storage. The optimizer appears to be choosing unwisely. This will take a few days to work out.
I also changed the container to be node storage with node indexes and the times went to:
2.3.11 -- 13 sec (slower than wholedoc)
2.4.13 -- 40 sec (faster than wholedoc)
I do know why your application is slower than the dbxml shell. There is a new flag that should almost always be used for wholedoc container queries -- DBXML_DOCUMENT_PROJECTION. Add that to you query excecution.
Another thing -- query preparation is a bit slower in 2.4 so you should use prepared queries whenever possible to amortize that cost.
Regards,
George

Software licence issues when upgrading to Leopard with a new machine

Hi,
This is a question about my licence for Logic, but also on a broader scale, all my plugins and AU instruments etc. of which I have bought many.
I want to upgrade to Leopard (currently on Tiger 10.4.11), and realise that it's going to be a long and painful process to re-install each program/plugin etc. as I want to start from a clean Leopard install.
I also want to do this on a new MacBook Pro, but am wondering what kind of complications I'm going to run into when doing so. I can't just close one machine down while I transfer across the programs as I need it to work with, so I was going to prepare an external FW (or USB?) hard drive with Leopard, configure it and install all I need, and then clone that to my new MBP once I've got the money together to buy it.
Will this void the licence for Logic (and all my other programs) considering I'll essentially have two different machines with the same software? Is there an easier way to do this (particularly without installing each program again)?
Thanks
osu
Message was edited by: onesizeup

You can run Logic on two different machines; just not at the same time. So there are no logistical (ha ha) problems from that point of view.
As regards the more general issue of copying over data…
There are applications such as Carbon Copy Cloner (shareware) which can make exact copies of your volumes, & there is Migration Assistant (part of OS X) that will allow you to move over the bits you need.
But if you are going for a clean install, you might prefer to do everything the hard way & re-install everything.
Personally, what I usually do is first a clean install, & then use my carefully-prepared back-ups to put everything from their previous locations directly into the corresponding locations in the new system. But this isn't recommended unless you really know what you're doing!
However, it does work perfectly for most things, as long as you take a few precautions & do everything in exactly the right order.
You can search in other Forums for lots of good advice on this type of move-over.

Webservice publish issue when upgrading from 11.1.1.4.0 to 11.1.2.0.0

Was working fine in 11.1.1.4.0 then I upgraded to 11.1.2.0.0 and now when I click on "Webservice Properties" then go to methods some are grayed out. I click the "Why Not?" button and it says.
There was an error validating the SEI, but no specific error messages were reported.
Go back, open the same project up in 1.1.1.4.0 and no problems. I even cut the service down to one simple method to publish and still get the error.
Any ideas?
Edited by: bartmc on Aug 26, 2011 11:24 AM

I have the identical issue. Is there any solution? I am o on a clean install of 11.1.2.1 and it is doing this. If I add another dummy method to the class, I can get one step further and select the method I want, but then I get the same SEI error.

Issues when Upgrading from SRSS 4.1 to 5.2.1

Hi There.
Yesterday I upgraded a client's environment from SRSS 4.1 to 5.2.1.
Environment:
Solaris 10 hosting Sun Ray Server, Kiosk Mode configured with Windows Connector pointing at Windows Server 2003 Terminal Server. Used utadm to remove the old firmware config and reconfigured with the new firmware config. All Thin Clients now have the new Oracle Branded Firmware.
After the Upgrade, the users can't seem to hold down the Backspace Key to erase text at a faster pace or use Page Down in an Excel Spreadsheet to get through their workbooks faster. When these buttons are used in their held down position the performance is really slow. Tapping these keys however works fine.
EG: Tapping backspace 20 times to erase 20 Characters is ok. Holding down the Backspace Key to do the same thing is very slow.
Anyone know of any issues or performance issues Post running this upgrade.
Cheers
- Joe.

have you looked at the following performance tuning?
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25749_01/E25745/html/Tuning-Performance-Improving-Network-Performance.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25749_01/E25745/html/Troubleshooting-Network-Switches.html
Some other options to consider
-D Disables the video acceleration path for Windows 7 and
Windows 2008 R2.
-M off
Specify which accelerated media paths to use (supported
only with Windows XP and Windows 2003).
-M off
Specify which accelerated media paths to use (supported
only with Windows XP and Windows 2003).
-F off|x11|xvideo|all|keep
Specify which flash acceleration paths to use and
allows to set the flash state to it's initial state
when session is disconnected.
So can't say that his is a bug. All known issues have been fixed by SRS 5.3. If you still have problems, please open a Service Request via My Oracle Support see
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25749_01/E25743/html/Support.html

Mail issues when upgrading from Snow Leopard to Lion

Hello,
I'm hoping someone out there may be able to answer this question or offer some advice. I am being prompted by Apple to move over to iCloud which requires me upgrading from Snow Leopard to Lion. I am extremely reluctant to do this as I have heard of problems when migrating to Lion, especially with Mail. I presently have over 30,000 emails in my inbox. These mails are divided into a multitude of folders all on my mac. I have a mac email account along with other non Apple email accounts (POP) on my Mac. These emails and the folder structure are fundamental to my work so losing any emails or even the folder structure would be disastrous for me. I have of course made a backup (2 in fact) but do like the idea of trying to rebuild everything from scratch. Any advice would be greatly welcomed. Thanks.

I'm no expert but at the moment I just woudn't do it as there appears to be lots of unexplained problems with mail and Lion. I have been a Mac user from the earliest days and have never ever had the kinds of problems I am currently having to work around since installing Lion. I wish I had stayed with Snow Leopard.

Tag issue when upgrading from PSE 7 to 11

I've upgraded from PSE 7 to 11 and the tags for people, while there, do not appear in the "people" section fo PSE11. Any suggestions on how to get them all to show?

In PSE11, people tags have been moved to People view, this view contains all people tags along with categories. In case you want to view them along with tags panel, it can be enabled through View->Show People in Tag panel.

MAXDB issue when upgrading from SP14 to SP15

Hello,
I am trying to upgrade my local WAS to SP15. I am getting the following DB error during the installation (excerpt from callSdmViaSapinst.log file):
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Creating connections to database "J2E".
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Creating vendor connection to database.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Vendor connection created successfully.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Creating openSQL connection to database.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:03... Info: OpenSQL connection created successfully.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!LOGHEADER[START]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!HELP[Manual modification of the header may cause parsing problem!]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!LOGGINGVERSION[1.5.3.7186 - 630]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!NAME[C:\usr\sap\J2E\JC00\SDM\program\log\jddilog20060215103203.log]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!PATTERN[jddilog20060215103203.log]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!FORMATTER[com.sap.dictionary.database.dbs.DbTraceFormatter(%s %m %-30l %24d)]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!ENCODING[Cp1252]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!LOGHEADER[END]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info:
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: E R R O R ******* (DbObjectSqlStatements)
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: 10:32:04 2006-02-15 dbs-Error: Exception caught during SQL execution [-6000] (at 15): Duplicate table name:BC_CMSRTS CREATE TABLE "BC_CMSRTS"("VENDOR" VARCHAR(256) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "NAME" VARCHAR(256) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "PROVIDER" VARCHAR(40) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "CMSNAME" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "CMSURL" VARCHAR(256) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "TRACKNAME" VARCHAR(8) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "SYSTYPE" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "LOCATION" VARCHAR(40) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "CONFIGTYPE" VARCHAR(5) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "RELEASE" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "SERVICELEVEL" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "PATCHLEVEL" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "APPLYTIME" VARCHAR(20) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' )
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info:
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: E R R O R ******* (DbModificationManager)
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: 10:32:04 2006-02-15 dbs-Error: Statements could not be executed successfully
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Error: Aborted: development component 'tc/SL/UTIL_JDD'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'6.4015.00.0000.20051027101403.0000':
No further description found.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: -
Deployment was successful -
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: Summarizing the deployment results:
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Error: Admitted: C:\Documents and Settings\DKEISERlocal\My Documents\Portal\installs\WAS15\J2EE-RUNT-CD\J2EE-ENG\OFFLINE\SAPJEECOR15_0.SCA
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Error: Admitted: C:\Documents and Settings\DKEISERlocal\My Documents\Portal\installs\WAS15\J2EE-RUNT-CD\J2EE-ENG\OFFLINE\JRFC.SDA
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:06... Error: Processing error. Return code: 4
Have tried everything I know of (restarting, etc.). Also tried to drop the duplicate table and it won't let me. Anyone have any ideas??
Thanks in advance...

Hi,
you could try (re)loading the MaxDB system tables. You can do that using either the Database Manager GUI, or from the commandline:
dbmcli -d <SID> -u <dbm-user>,<pwd> load_systab -u <dba-user>,<pwd> -ud DOMAIN
The standard dbm-user is called 'control', the standard dba-user 'superdba'.
Kind regards,
Roland

Has anyone had any data loss issues when upgrading their OS?

I am upgrading to Snow Leopard 10.6 and then to Lion, but I don't want to risk losing photos, music etc.
Thanks!

wolfenmac wrote:
I am upgrading to Snow Leopard 10.6 and then to Lion, but I don't want to risk losing photos, music etc.
Thanks!
You should backup before you do it, then you won't lose anything.

Change Log issues - Post Upgrade

Hi Experts,
We are in the process of Upgrading BW from 3.X to BI 7. As part of this we copied our existing Production system into the sand box and basis did the technical upgrade on the same (Sand Box). Later we ran some post upgrade Jobs as part of the SAP defined Upgrade Process.
1) But after the upgrade i can notice that most of the ODS objects, doesn't have 'Change Log' table in the 'Information (Log/Status)' screen.
2) Even when i try to view the change log content in Manage screen, it gives me a pop up to enter the change log table, instead of directly taking me to the selection screen.
3) When i try to activate a request, even that fails with an SQL error 'SAPSQL_EMPTY_TABNAME'.
Is there any process that has to be run to link the Older version change log tables to the corresponding ODSs after Upgrade?
Has anyone come accross similar issues? If yes, how was it solved? All suggestions are invited.
Thanks and Regards,
Jay

HI JayaPrasad,
Chek the note : 1059171 which is related to Change log,
I too faced this issue when upgraded to Bi7.0 on SP12, but as soon as SP13 is installed the issue is solved, so I suggest to go for SP 13 for upgrading to Bi7.0.
Regards,
Srinivas

Input requested: Issues in upgrading search for public site to 2013

We have a fully branded 2010 public site that uses search. In our upgrade to 2013:
We'd would prefer not to perform the visual upgrade because we don't want to update our master pages and page layouts.
Search currently uses a 2010 search scope to limit results to the single site collection - there are other portals on the farm.
We can't use the new 2013 result sources that replace search scopes, so I'm looking for a good way to limit search results. I know I could create a separate search service app for the portal, but I'd prefer not to do that.
Does anyone see a way to do this without performing the 2013 visual upgrade OR using custom development OR creating a new search service application that serves just the 2013. I know I'm asking to have my cake and eat it, too, but I want to exhaust
all easy options before I try something more complex.
Thanks for your help.
Nate

Hi Nate,
As I understand, you are concerning about custom branding and search scope issues when upgrading from SharePoint 2010 to 2013 version.
For custom branding, SharePoint 2013 introduces a new user interface that is lightweight, fast, and fluid. To get this new experience, you must upgrade to the new UI. If your site collection contains custom branding, we recommend that, before you upgrade,
you first create an evaluation site collection where you can test and re-create your custom branding in a SharePoint 2013 environment. For more information:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn178510(v=office.15).aspx
http://en.share-gate.com/blog/migrating-sharepoint-site-customizations-to-sp2013
For search scope feature in SharePoint 2010 search, we have content source now. To limit search results, we could use Query Rules and Result Sources:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/mspfe/archive/2013/02/01/how-query-rules-and-result-sources-can-be-used-to-customize-search-results.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/tothesharepoint/archive/2012/10/09/build-a-specialized-search-experience-in-minutes-with-sharepoint-2013.aspx
http://brainlitter.com/2013/03/22/sharepoint-2013-search-scopes-are-gone-but-dont-fret/
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected] .
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Is anyone else having Config error 16 issue when trying to start PSE 12 or Premier Elements after Mac upgrade to Yosemite 10.10 on iMac

Is anyone else having Config error 16 issue when trying to start PSE 12 or Premier Elements 12 after the Mac upgrade to OS X Yosemite 10.10 on iMac. I have had a number of issues with software and things after upgrading to OS X Yosemite 10.10 and even 10.10.1. I have uninstalled and reinstalled both PSE 12 and Premier Elements 12 a number of times and everything goes fine until its ready to launch and then you get an error message. Numerous uninstalled and reinstalls don't removing the problem. Strangely enough PSE 11 still appears to boot up and I never owned Premier Elements 11 so I don't know if it will start. I thought with Apple dropping its Apeture software and greater integration of iPhoto and Apeture files into Lightroom 5.7 all would be harmonious between these two players. Im not sure where Adobe wants us to go it recently removed the plugin to allow you to update files from LR to Adobe Revel, whats up with that. I now own two version of Adobe software that no longer work with my Mac and now way of uploading pictures from Lightroom to Revel. Needless to say I am pretty reluctant to sign on to a subscription of Creative Cloud with long term financial obligations when I can't even get my current Adobe software to work independently much less integrate with Lightroom. Frustrated with it all!

Get rid of 'put disks to sleep when possible' and you may see a dramatic improvement (not necessarily a cure).
That specific problem is a multiple-Processor (including graphics processor) problem, where one of the processors lost track of whether it should be responding to interrupts. You may have a Hardware problem.

Issue when trying to upgrade FB 4.7 to AIRDSK 3.6

Hi,
I'm desperately trying to upgrade FB 4.7 to AIRSDK 3.6 since 3 weeks.
I've followed the various solutions found on forums and the various processes displayed by the "helpx.adobe.com" pages, but none of them works.
So please, if a member of Adobe Support Team or someone who succeeded to perform the upgrade reads this, I need help and if possible a detailed strp by step process.
Thks in advance for answers.

I think i tried all the available ones, and there are many. Why can't we
have a definitive automatic upgrade solution instead of having to do
such a number of manipulations ?
Le 14/03/2013 04:41, Flex harUI a écrit :
>
Re: Issue when trying to upgrade FB 4.7 to AIRDSK 3.6
created by Flex harUI <http://forums.adobe.com/people/Flex+harUI> in
/Flex/ - View the full discussion
<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5146932#5146932

Accent issue when upgrading Uccx 7 to 9

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for