Access 2003 and 2010 Side-by-Side App-V 5

I have an issue here where I have Access 2003 sequenced and Access 2010 sequenced but they will not install alongside each other.
Both deploy (using CM2012) individually OK. But when deploying side-by-side I find that only one can be installed at once.
If Access 2003 is installed, when I select to install 2010 via the CM Software Centre it removes Access 2003. If Access 2010 is installed first, when installing 2003 it removes 2010.
I would like both installed at the same time but this behaviour is puzzling me. Has anyone else experienced this type of behaviour?
Cheers

Do your packages all have the same Package GUID? Perhaps your sequencer snapshot was saved with the machine turned on so that all packages you are creating have the same GUID? If so, always start from a snapshot with the machine in a shut down state.
Dan Gough - UK App-V MVP
Blog: packageology.com
Twitter: @packageologist
LinkedIn

Similar Messages

After conecting to SQLexpress 2008r2 using ODBC, access 2003 and 2010 says conection failed.

After conecting to SQLexpress using ODBC MS access 2003 and 2010 says the conection failed with in the app. Not all users are having this issue. Unable to track down the cause. Any help would would be appearated.

With the miniscule of information you have given, it's not really possible to help you. At a very minimum, we need the complete error message you are getting, so that we can tell whether the reach the server and are denied access, or they don't even
come that far.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Running Unity with both Exchange 2003 and 2010?

My company is planning to upgrade from Exchange 2003 to 2010. We are
currently using Unity 7.0. We'd like to run the two in parrallel for a bit and take our time switching users over.
Now I've read that Unity can support Exchange 2010, but I haven't found anything about running Unity using both Exchange 2003 and 2010 in parrallel.
Is this something Unity can handle?

We're doing something similar, but we have an in-place Unity 7 and Exchange 2003 environment; we are putting some users from an org we support on an Exchange 2010 server, but do not want that to be the partner server (yet). The instructions seem to point you to making 2010 the partner; I'm wondering why Step 13 (of your link) we are uninstalling the Exchange Server 2003 System Management Tools, if it’s a mixed environment and 2003 will still be the partner server. I also saw somewhere that you don’t have to move the unitymsgstoresvc account to Exchange 2010 if you are in a mixed environment. Is that true? Thank you.

OLE object error when using with Access 2003 and Adobe Reader X

I link to .pdf files in Access 2003 and since upgrading to Adobe Reader X yesterday, am unable to link to these files. I receive an error stating "A problem occurred while accessing the OLE object". It goes on to tell me to verify that the file is where I say it is and that it is accessible, which it is. I can go to that file in Adobe Reader and open it.

Disable the protection mode in the preferences of Adobe Reader.

What does my Mac need to run Access 2003 and SAM training CD

I'm enrolled in an intro database class using Microsoft Office Access 2003 and SAM 2003 Assessment and Training CD. Both require a PC, but I have Mac Book Pro 2. Would someone please explain to a PC dummy what my Mac would need to run these two applications or if I need to (gulp) purchase a PC. Mostly likely I'll be taking additional classes in the future. Thank you.

Welcome to the Apple Forums.
You will need the following to Run MS Access and SAM 2003:
1. An Intel Mac (You already have this)
2. Leopard Operating System (You have Tiger), which contains boot camp to install Windows
3. Windows XP or Windows Vista installation Disk (Please read the Boot Camp instructions/Guide)
4. Microsoft Office 2003 or 2007 for Windows (which has MS Access)
Axel F.

Public folders are not in sync after settting up Replicas between Exchange 2003 and 2010

I have setup Public Folder replicas between the 2 Exchange servers and I can see all the top and sub level folders.
For those mailboxes that were migrated over to Exchange 2010, I have noticied a lower number of item contents in these fodders when views from an Outlook client whose mailbox had been migrated over to Exchange 2010.
On Exchange 2003 System Manager, if I properties one of the Public Folders, under the Replicataion tab, I can see the old and new server there. On the Exchange server 2003 box, I can see the last update reviced was a few weeks ago.
I did see an option to synchronize content but I am not sure which server to run this one from. The Exchange 2003 or 2010 server.
There is also a Resend Changes... option. Should I use this instead?
Can anyone advise?

Hi,
The "Resend changes" and "Synchronize content" options in Exchange 2003 ESM are used to initiate hierarchy and content replication.
To update public folder hierarchy and content from Exchange 2010 side, you can use the following commands.
Update-PublicFolderHierarchy
Update-PublicFolder
Please run the Get-publicfolderstatistics cmdlet to get public folder details such as item count, this information will help you compare content replicated between the source and destination servers.
Besides, here is a blog about public folder replication troubleshooting for your reference.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2006/01/17/417611.aspx
Hope this is helpful to you.
Best regards,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

MS Access 2003 and Data Services 3.0

I want to access MS Access 2003 from Aqualogic Data Services 3.0. The documentation tells me that Aqualogic Data Services 3.0 supports MS Access 2003
I read the "Extending Database Support" from the Administration Guide to deploy the xml file ... I did it successful!
But I can't configure the data source in the console to point to Access2003. How can I do it?

Thank you Mike for the answer.
The aqualogic Data Services release 3 support MS Access 2003, as you can verify in "Relational Providers Included With ALDSP" in this manual:
http://edocs.bea.com/aldsp/docs30/admin/aldsp-wrapper-ext.html#wp1134932
In the http://localhost:7001/console, when I go to the "Create a New JDBC Data Source", only those DB appears in the Database Type: "adabas for z/OS, CICS/TS for z/OS, Cache, Cloudscape, DB2, DB2 for z/OS, Derby, Enterprise DB, FirstSQL, IMS/DB for z/OS, IMS/TM for z/OS, Informix, Ingres, MS SQL Server, MaxDB, MySQL, Oracle, PointBase, PostgreSQL, Progress, Sybase, VSAM for z/OS , Other".
But the "MS Access 2003" didn't appears in this menu. The MS-Access.jar file was copied into ALDSP\provider path, and another items was created succesfully as shown in the "Deploying the rational provider" in http://edocs.bea.com/aldsp/docs30/admin/aldsp-wrapper-ext.html#wp1136406
I wants to create the datasource for MSAccess 2003. How can I do it?

Paragraph Alignment and Justification different in Word 2003 and 2010

Hi all,
We are migrating some letter templates from word 2003 to word 2010 for our system and we found a alignment problem in word 2010 (actually, it is not a problem and I think the behavior in 2010 is correct)
In word 2003, the following paragraph alignment will display like this :
"To enjoy your membership in our service center, please remit a payment of US$
123456789.00 per annual"
In word 2010, the following paragraph alignment will show like this
"To enjoy your membership in our service center, please remit a payment of
US$ 123456789.00 per annual"
(US$ 123456789.00 is shown on same line in 2010 but US$ and dollar amount are not
on the same line in 2003)
Although I think the paragraph alignment in 2010 is more reasonable, I still want to achieve back
the look in 2003 such that we can easily to compare results.
As in one post that I asked help in this forum, one expert shows me that there is option to set back the layout
look behavior in 2003, I guess if there are some advance settings to achieve this?
Please kindly advise to me on this.
Thanks in advance for your help,
Ray

There is a difference, but it turns out to be a "2-factor" one. As far as I can tell, "enabling an 'east asian' language for editing" is the other factor. When you create
a document with such a language enabled, wrapping of currency amounts works differently in Windows Word 2007 and later. Once created, the problem seems to occur even on copies of Word that only have (say) English enabled.
In Word 2003, having such a language enabled for editing appears to make no difference.
Whether "enabling of an 'east asian' language is the cause of the problem described by the OP, or the only thing that will result in such a difference, I cannot tell.
Here, I tested roughly as follows:
a. back up normal.dot/normal.dotm
a. open Word 2010 and ensure only English is enabled as an editing language
b. create a new document
c. Type
" $ a"
(space, $, 10 spaces, "a", no quotation marks).
d. Type text + spaces before that, until the "a" wraps onto the next line.
e. save and close that
f. enable (say) one of the Chinese languages for editing.
g. restart Word
h. repeat (b)-(d). This time, I think you will see that the $, 10 spaces and the "a" wrap as a unit.
i. Save that.
j. disable the East Asian language again and restart Word. Open each document and see how the wrapping behaves.
Here, I happen to have Chinese enabled as one of the editing languages in my copy of Word 2003 and I do not see the "wrap as a unit" behaviour in that case, or in either
of the two .doc fiels saved from Word 2010.
Here, the behaviour appeared to be the same whether I used $, £ (UK pound sign) or the Yen character symbol, but not the Euro currency symbol.
I saved my test files (including some created in Word 2003) in 2007 XML format and tried to pin down the significant difference. Per-dcoument compatibility settings
didn't seem to be involved. Changing the w:eastAsia language attribute in the following element in the styles.xml file was enough to change the behaviour:
<w:styles><w:docDefaults><w:rPrDefault><w:rPr><w:lang ...
Peter Jamieson

Exchange 2003 and 2010 Co existing mode

Dear all
I migrated users from exchange server 2003 to 2010.
I can send mail to external domain but i does not receive from external domain and users receive error as 550 5.1.1 users unknown.
Please do the needful
Parthiban selvaraj

Dear all
I migrated users from exchange server 2003 to 2010.
I can send mail to external domain but i does not receive from external domain and users receive error as 550 5.1.1 users unknown.
Please do the needful
Parthiban selvaraj
Users unknown? That doesnt make any sense. Is the 2010 and 2003 server in the same forest? How did you migrate these users? What server is reporting the NDR? Please post the exact NDR ( and cover up the server and domain name if required)
Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Need to use Office 97, XP, 2003 and 2010 on the same PC

Hello there,
I need to use different versions of office product on my PC, a winXP Sp3 box. I used Office 97, XP and 2003 so far without any trouble.
Now I installed Office 2010, taking care of the "leave previous Office versions" enabled during installation and to place the 2010 files in a "Office10" folder rather than the default one. Each Office suite has its own folder too.
From now I have this problem: starting any XP or 2003 application will show up the windows installer reconfiguration window, and this takes a lot of time until the application effectively starts. If then I wish to use a 2010 app, launching it will show
the office 2010 setup-reconfiguration window, so another couple of minutes of elaboration is needed until I can use my app.
Please someone can help me with this issue?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Multiple versions of Microsoft Office software can be installed, if you install earliest version of Office first. Following order of installation should allow error free usage of multiple Office software versions.
First - Microsoft Office XP
Second - Microsoft Office 2003
Third - 2007 Office suites and programs
Fourth - Microsoft Office 2010 suites (32-bit versions only)
Above order applies to installation of whole Microsoft Office suite and also individual Office programs on single Windows PC.
In your case, you have installed these apps successfully, but Windows Installer Appears Every Time when you start office XP or 2003, try this:
Open the Group Policy Editor by selecting Run from the Start Menu, and typing
gpedit.msc. (If the file is missing, run mmc.exe instead. Then, select
Add/Remove Snap-in from the Console menu, click
Add, and double-click Group Policy. Click
Finish, then Close, then Ok.)
Expand the following branches:
Local Computer Policy \ Computer Configuration \ Administrative Templates \ Windows Components \ Windows Installer
Double-click Disable Windows Installer to your right, click
Enabled, and choose Always from the list. Click Ok when you're done.
The change will take effect immediately. If you added a snap in, as described above, you don't need to "save changes to the console."
Note: If you encounter an error about the Administrator Policy the next time you try to install an application, you'll have to re-enable the Windows Installer temporarily.
Also you said "If then I wish to use a 2010 app, launching it will show the office 2010 setup-reconfiguration window". To work around this issue:
Open Run (Press Windows key + R) copy and paste the following commands one at a time and then press ENTER.
reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Word\Options /v NoReReg /t REG_DWORD /d 1
reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Excel\Options /v NoReReg /t REG_DWORD /d 1
reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Access\Options /v NoReReg /t REG_DWORD /d 1
NOTE: You should back-up the registry using the steps given
here before modification.

Are there any known issues with speed between excel 2003 and 2010 when using WAAS?

Request asked by customer. Thought I would run this by the forum first.
Can you please raise a ticket with Cisco TAC asking why Excel files in 97-2003 file format cannot be fully optimized when compared to the same file being saved in the latest file format?
When using the latest file format, the user experience is amazing and up to 100x faster to open and save files. Our testing has identified an issue with the older file format.

I deployed WAAS about 3 years ago. Part of the deployment was before and after testing. When the users used Office 2010 the results were good. When they used Office 2003 the results were terrible. Some files took minutes to open, some never opened. Solution was to upgrade to O2010.
Hope this helps.

2003 and 2010 Meeting Problem

I have a room with that was scheduled with a recurring meeting every Monday on Exchange 2010.
That same room was scheduled at the same time on exchange 2003. However, this was scheduled before the recurring meeting.
The problem is that the recurring meeting took precedence over the single meeting, even though the single meeting was scheduled first.
The exchange server is 2003.
How do I fix this issue, so that even if a recurring meeting is scheduled, the single meeting that was scheduled before is not canceled?
Is this an issue with 2010 vs 2003?

Hi,
Please run the following command to check the Calendar Attendant configuration on
this room mailbox:
Get-CalendarProcessing Room1 | FL
The ConflictPercentageAllowed parameter specifies the maximum percentage of meeting conflicts for new recurring meeting requests. We can read the results of the command to check it.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Migrating Users 2003 to 2010

We are currently running Exchange 2003 and 2010 in Co-Existence. I have been moving users from 2003 to 2010 and users from a particular Database (2003) are Completing With Errors. Users from every other store are moving successfully. The
comment of the move request is
Warning: Failed to clean up the source mailbox after the move.
Error details: MapiExceptionNotFound: Unable to delete mailbox. (hr=0x8004010f, ec=-2147221233)
The original error mailbox is marked for deletion on Exchange 2003 and the user is able to access on Exchange 2010.
I have researched this error and i believe Exchange 2003 will clean up the mailboxes after 30 days but i just want to try and confirm it. Also is there any maintenance i can run on the 2003 Store to stop this from happening?
Thanks

As long as you can access the new Exchange 2010 mailbox and mails are being received\sent, this error can be ignored. The source mailbox being left behind won't do any harm. It becomes a disconnected mailbox, which will be cleaned
up by the store after a while (the default is 30 days).
There is a known issue with Exchange 2003 and need to install a hot-fix
KB940012 so try after installing it.
OM (MCITP) | Blog

Exchange 2003 to 2010 Migration Active-Sync & OWA

I am in the process of migrating from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. I have a co-existence running currently. I have moved 1 mail box over to the new exchange server (a test account I created). I have 2 questions, one about OWA and the other about Active-Sync/Mobile
access.
1. When I log into my internal OWA site I can access the webmail just fine. However when I try to go to my external OWA site I get a HTTP Error 404. I have setup the weblink https://webmail.company.com in my external DNS record. However the internal link
says it is https://webmail.company.com/owa. Is there something additional that needs to be setup in IIS for the external site to work or only after the migration is completed?
2. I tried adding the account I migrated to my cell phone for mail but I just get a "Connection to server has failed" message. The internal and external link for mobile access is both the same and setup in external DNS https://mail.comapny.com.
Is this a feature that only works after the migration is completed? I have ports 80,443,143,25,993 open in my sonicwall for e-mail services. However the IP is still set to my old exchange server. Is it possible to have 2 settings the same in sonicwall with
2 different IP's? Last time I tried it with migrating my VPN neither VPN server worked after that.
Any help and insight would be greatly appreciated. I am new to systems administration and this is my first exchange migration

Hi,
Here are my answers you can refer to :
1. To deploy OWA in the Exchange 2003 and 2010 coexistence, we need a legacy namespace for the Exchange 2003 server.
For more information, you can refer to the following article:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2009/12/02/3408921.aspx
Additionally, for the 404 error, I recommend you check the IIS log to find the root cause:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943891
2. I recommend you deploy Exchange 2010 in the "Internet Facing AD Site" and Exchange 2003 server in the "Non-Internet facing AD site": set the external URL in CAS 2010 and point mail.company.com to Exchange 2010 server IP address.
For more information, you can refer to the following article:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2009/12/08/3408985.aspx
thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Access 2003: sql statement question

Dear all,
i'm trying to get the following code to work without success:
String com = "SELECT Instrument.Index FROM Instrument WHERE Instrument.NextCalDate < #5/24/2007#";
s.execute(com);
I get the following error: Error: java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Syntax error (missing operator) in query expression 'Instrument.NextCalDate < #5/24/2007#'.
It is because of the <. If i change the < by an = it works fine. The annoying thing is that i've been browsing the forum and some date related questions regarding java/access were explained by giving example code that had the exact same syntax as the code i'm using, so with the use of the < character without using escape characters or whatever. These postings however date from 2004 or something, so what has changed?
I'm using latest JDK, Access 2003 and am connecting via ODBC running on an XP Pro machine.
Help is very much appreciated. Thanks from The Netherlands
Message was edited by:
bassiedude

I suspect one thing that changed was that those other examples were using a previous version of MS Access.
Other than that I can only suggest that you use a prepared statement rather than attempting to the MS Access specific syntax.

Access 2003 and 2010 Side-by-Side App-V 5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for