Access 2010 filter bug

Hi.
If I create a table with Real(1,0) type field, then filter by this field does not work, and I receive the message "Enter parameter value TABLENAME.FIELDNAME.FileURL". If field type is not Real(1,0), then filter does work properly. In Access
97-2003 filter on this table always does work properly.

Hi Lord,
I can also reproduce the problem. I will help you to submit this bug and appreciate for your discovering. It may be fixed in the later version.
Best Regards,
Bruce Song [MSFT]
MSDN Community Support | Feedback to us
Get or Request Code Sample from Microsoft
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Similar Messages

Access 2010 filter by form problem

I have an Access program with the forms recordset populated by a ado recordset with data from a SQL Sever stored procedure.
Fiter by forms works nicely under Access 2003.
I migrated to Office 2010 and converted my Access program to the 2007 format, recompiled the whole and started to run with Access 2010.
And now I cannot filter by forms anymore.
I can use the new shortcut menu but it never actually filters my data at all on the form.
On the internet I found someone who found out that replacing a dll with the one from Office 2007 does fix this.
And it actually does but surely this cannot be the final solution.
Any one experienced the same behaviour and found a solution.

Hi,
First, I want you to confirm whether the steps of converting Access 2003 to Access 2010 is right:
On the
File tab, click Open.
In the
Open dialog box, select and open the Access 2000 or Access 2002 - 2003 database (.mdb) that you want to convert.
On the
File tab, click Save & Publish, and then, under
Database File Types click Access Database (*.accdb).
Click
Save As.
If any database objects are open when you click
Save As, Access prompts you to close them prior to creating the copy. Click
Yes to make Access close the objects, or click No to cancel the entire process. If needed, Access will also prompt you to save any changes.
In the
Save As dialog box, type a file name in the File name box, and then click
Save.
Access creates the copy of the database, and then opens the copy. Access automatically closes the original database.
Quote from:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/access-help/convert-a-database-to-the-accdb-file-format-HA010341552.aspx
Secondly, try to reapply the filter in the Access 2010 to check the issue. Please refer to the “Filter by form” part of the following link to see
the steps:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/access-help/apply-a-filter-to-view-select-records-in-an-access-database-HA010341691.aspx#formfilter
Jaynet Zhang
TechNet Community Support

Access 2010 Runtime / ACCDE Bug

I have just wasted a day chasing a very silly BUG!
If you install Access2010 Runtime and then try to run an ACCDE database that has a macro that uses Runcode the macro fails!
Verified on 2 different Win XP machines;
An almost blank database with a single macro using RunCode to call a very simple function with just a msgbox function in it results in the error;
"The Expression you entered has a function that Microsoft Access can't find."
The Cure:
Download and install runtime SP1 from http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=26601
Note that Windows Update does not show or offer this update!
Brian, ProcessIT- Hawke's Bay, New Zealand

The simple and basic issue here is that WHEN you deploy compiled applications, you want to match up the version.
If your dev machine has a SP update, then you need to ensure that the target computers also have that update.
This issue does not occur when you use an accDB since the source code is included, and thus an “automatic” re-compile of the code can occur (even with runtime, such an automatic re-compile of code can occur). Thus the binary resulting machine code matches
the version of Access build. (and when I say version - different SP levels are different versions).
So the symptom pointed out here ONLY occurs when source code is not available, and the binary parts are pre-compiled like they are in a accde.
For Access 2013 runtime, the SP updates are included. For the Access 2010 runtime, the sp updates are NOT included. And installing the office SP update will NOT update the 2010 runtime.
Nor will windows update update 2010 runtime. So install of the SP update to Access runtime has to be downloaded and installed. Or the SP update can be “included” in your copy of the 2010 runtime.
In most cases, NOT having windows update or NOT having someone come along and install office SP not touching the runtime is a “preferred” setup since then windows update, or other things will not update Access runtime and NOT mess things up. So near everything
leaves the 2010 runtime alone as it should.
And while I seen problems like this back in Access 2003 (by trying to run a compiled applications with 2000), the simple lesson here is that compiled applications while often preferable do require more caution and effort to match up the edition of the version
of Access the user is running to the SAME edition that will compile + develop the application.
This is thus mostly due to the simple fact that when souce code is removed from the application, then you cannot re-compile the code to a different binary version of Access.
Regards,
Albert D. Kallal (Access MVP)
Edmonton, Alberta Canada

Should I have installed Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Pack 64 bit with Ex 2013 SP1?

I have installed Exchange 2013 SP1 on a 2012R2 server, and all went well (I am at early stages of migration).
Following the pre-reqs listed here: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb691354%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx#WS2012
I installed Microsoft Unified Communications Managed API 4.0, Core Runtime 64-bit only.
Since then I have seen other articles suggesting that I install:
Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Pack 64 bit
Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Pack SP1 64 bit
Given I didn't notice any errors in the install, do I need to install those filter packs or is that outdated advice?
regards
Roga

Thanks for taking the time to post Ed
I did a bit more research and it appears that there is more than one view on this.
E.G. this blog
Why Exchange 2013 doesn’t need the Microsoft Office Filter Pack says:
"Exchange 2013 swaps MSSearch for the Search Foundation, a component shared with SharePoint 2013. The Search Foundation has no need of the Office Filter Pack because it includes its own filters. Unfortunately, until SP1 came along,
the Exchange 2013 Setup program overlooked this fact and stated that the Office Filter Pack was a prerequisite. Setup would install if the Office Filter Pack was missing, but who’s going to ignore a warning issued by Setup. In any case, that warning seems
to have finally been suppressed."
This blog
Planning and migrating a small organization from Exchange 2007 to 2013 (Part 10) has:
"After choosing the relevant setting needed to begin installation, the Exchange 2013 setup program will now perform readiness checks. Assuming these complete successfully, we'll expect to see just one warning.
This warning relates to the lack of the Office 2010 Filter Packs, which are not required for installation, and are only required to create Transport Rules for OneNote or Publisher files"
And this one
Exchange Server 2013 FAQ: Is the Office Filter Pack Required?
"The Exchange 2013 pre-requisites page on
TechNet, at the time of this writing, does include the Office Filter Packs as a step in the preparation of a server for Exchange 2013. What it doesn’t make clear is that they are not required.
The new Exchange Search already has support for indexing/searching Office file types, as well as a series of other file types including some third party formats such as PDF. You can see a full list
here.
So should you install the Office Filter Pack? If you want to stop seeing that warning message, then yes. If you want to take the approach of only installing required software on your servers, then no. Consider also that installing it means potentially having
to update it later on if there is a bug fix or a security issue."
The final para above is the approach that I have now taken, but if someone can give me a good reason to install office 2010 filter packs on Ex 2013 sp1 I'll revise my view
regards
roga

Windows 7 64 bit, Access 2010 32 bit, Oracle 10G client 32 bit, Oracle database 10.2.0.4 64 bit

I am trying to connect to an Oracle 10.2.0.4 database from Windows 7 OS - 64 bit using
Access 2010 32 bit and Oracle 32 bit client version 10.2.0.1 installed on PC.
My user requires a 64 bit Windows 7 OS for other needs.
Oracle ODBC driver is 32 bit from Oracle 32 bit client.
In Windows 7 OS 64 bit, ODBC DSN setup software is located in:
C:\Windows\system32\odbcad32.exe for 64 bit drivers - all DSN types setup and
C:\Windows\syswow64\odbcad32.exe for 32 bit drivers - USER DSN setup
When I run the ODBC Data Source Administrator, I see the Version number is 6.1.7601.17632
I setup a User DSN using the 32 bit odbcad32.exe with a 32 bit ODBC driver.
Our Oracle TNSnames.ora file has our standard entries which have worked for years
(Windows 7 OS 32 bit and everything 32 bit has connected for years too)
So when I configure an ODBC User DSN and leave all the default settings and press the TEST Connection button, it says it works.
But when I open the existng Access 2010 database (which does connect to Oracle in a Windows 7 32 bit PC environment),
1. I go to Access External Data ribbon tab / Link to the Data Source by creating a linked table / press OK
2. I select the Machine Data source = to the USER DSN name / press OK
3. The Oracle ODBC Driver Connect Window opens with Service Name = USER DSN and User Name and it wants a Password
4. I enter the correct password and I get the following error message:
ODBC call failed
[Oracle][ODBC]{Ora]ORA-12154: TNS: could not resolve the connect identifier specified
(#12154) [Microsoft][ODBC Driver manager] Driver's SQLSetConnectAttr failed IM006 0
[Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Driver's SQLSetConnectAttr failed (#0)
I have tried a quite a number of fixes:
I have gone into the PC registry and cleaned out most or all off the Oracle client keys and
reinstalled the Oracle 32 bit 10g client. It didn't fix the error.
I read about the Oracle instantclient-basic-win32-10.2.0.4.zip with ODBC modules but I have Windows 7 64 bit.
Anyone experienced a problem like this and have a fix?

Thank you for your reply.
I did not get to try it because after I entered my question, I did a lot more internet Googling.
I found this small comment:
“There's a known issue where you get a 12154 error message running 32 bit software on a 64 bit OS using client 10201, and
It should be resolved by patching the client to 10204, which you do by applying the 10204 database patch to it.”
I searched around for the 10.2.0.4 patch for 10.2.0.1 Oracle 32 bit client.
When I contacted my Oracle DBA to ask if he had that patch, he said that I should try the 11g 32 bit client on the Win 7 64 bit PC.
We have a 10.2.0.4 Oracle database but he said the 11g client should work fine.
I tried it and it solved the problem!
With so many settings, configurations and permissions involved in ODBC, I am inclined to think that I missed a setting but
it was a bug in the 32 bit client 10.2.0.1.
Solved.

Access 2010 InfoPath Data Collection Export Fails Due to Date Format That Includes Time Zone

I created an Access 2010 database that has multiple data collection (InfoPath) forms that were generated from Access and have been in use for about 1.5 years. Starting in 2013 (for about a week now), the submitted data fails to Export due
to a "data type conversion error" with the date fields. Prior to 2013, the date string returned in the InfoPath form looked like this: "2013-01-07T00:00:00", but now it looks like this: "2013-01-07T00:00:00-05:00". The time zone is appended
to the string and it kills the Outlook Export feature.
To test this, I created a new database with one table and one date time field. I generated an InfoPath template and emailed it to myself. I entered the date into the template and submitted it (tried manually entering the date as well as
using the date time picker control - made no difference). The InfoPath template now contains "2013-01-07T00:00:00-05:00" and will not Export from Outlook to Access. I tried manually pasting the string into the Access table and it would take it,
but would show "1/7/2013 5:00:00 AM" in the date time field (which isn't correct either but at least it took). Note: This problem has appeared at my office (Win 7 with Office 2010), but my testing was done on my personal laptop using Win 8 with Office
2010.
It looks like Microsoft has created a bug and now all of my data collection forms are unusable. Any help will be appreciated.

Microsoft confirmed that the issue was introduced with MS12-066 as follows:
***Start Quote
We have been able to identify that this issue was introduced with the change made for the hotfix detailed in KB 2687395. This update was included in the security update MS12-066 when you installed KB 2687417.
2687395 Description of the InfoPath 2010 hotfix package (ipeditor-x-none.msp): August 28, 2012
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2687395/EN-US
2687417 MS12-066: Description of the security update for InfoPath 2010 Service Pack 1: October 9, 2012
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2687417/EN-US
Investigating workarounds I've only come up with using HTML forms or changing the datatype of the control to text.
***End Quote
My own testing also indicates that if you are using InfoPath with SQL Server, you may be able to change the Date/Time picker control in InfoPath to a Date only picker control (if the SQL Server data
type will support that).

MS Office Access 2010 - Copy to Oracle?

Hi,
Does the "Copy to Oracle" functionality in SQL*Dev 4 work for an Access 2010 database source?
Thanks
Joel

Hi willjamu ,
Do you mean right click "copy to Oracle"?
Blob seems the only thing slightly unusual and I though that was handled.
Can you make a complete test case - including table name so I can duplicate it and log a bug.
Note there may be warnings/errors in the 'Logging Page' user interface area.
-Turloch
SQLDeveloper Team

Unable to read data in Excel 2010/2013 from encrypted Access 2010/2013 database

A customer has an Access database (.accdb), which was encrypted/given a database password in Access 2013. It should be possible to read that data from Excel 2010/2013, but when clicking on Data-->From Access
and the correct path is put in and the correct database password has been entered, Excel just keeps prompting for the database password. This happens with both Excel 2010 and 2013.
The database password supplied is correct as evidenced by opening the database in Access 2013 using the same database password.
A colleague in a separate company has found that a separate .accdb file he has recently encrypted also has the same problem as above, yet a .accdb file encrypted ages ago
is readable from Excel.
How do I get Excel 2010/2013 to read the data from the encrypted .accdb file, please?

Since Access 2010 the encryption algorithm has changed:
Source
Follow the next steps to apply an encryption method that will allow you to (programmatically) connect to the database:
1. Decrypt the database
2. Change the encryption method:
   - In Access Options select 'Client Settings'
   - Scroll down to section 'Advanced'
   - 'Encryption Method': select option 'Use legacy encryption (..'
   - Click 'OK'
3. Encrypt the database
Hope this helps.
Emiel Nijhuis

MS Access 2010 and Oracle SQL Developer Version 4.0.3.16 Error

OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
System Type: 64-bit Operating System
I can not get MS Access 2010 to work/open with SQL Developer version 4.0.3.16.
ERROR when testing connection to MS Access 2010
"Status : Failure -Test failed: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Data source name not found and no default driver specified"
I added the 32-bit ODBC data source for the MS Access I am trying to use with SQL Developer version 4.0.3.16 with the "C:\Windows\SysWOW64\odbcad32.exe" application, but I still get the same error.
I appears that SQL Developer version 4.0.3.16.is looking at the 64-bit driver (ODBC Data Source) and I have no idea to direct SQL Developer version 4.0.3.16 to use the 32-bit driver (ODBC Data Source) when opening MS Access 2010.
Thank you in advance for your advice.

I downloaded the SQL Developer version 4.0.3.16 "sqldeveloper-4.0.3.16.84-x64.zip" that included the jre.
How do I check which Java JDK I am running (32-bit versuns 64-bit)?
In the command prompt I use "java -version" and I get this message "java is not recognized as an internal or external command"

MS Access 2010 and TFS problem when I try to "create form team foundaition"

I am using MS Access 2010 and trying to use TFS for source control.
I installed MSSCCI for 2010 and the "Access Developer Extensions"
I am able to create a project in TFS and check in and check out access objects.
My only problem is when I click on "Create from Team Foundation" it asks me to specify the server and when I click OK it gives me the following error message:
"Cannot create a new Microsoft Access database from this source code control project. It contains neither a Data and Misc. objects file nor a database name file."
I have tried different ways and could not get it to work.
Thanks for your help

Did you figure out a solution for this!>?
I am having the same issue. I can issue a GET and bring down all the objects (including the very files that it says it can't find) - then when "creating from team foundation" I get the same problem.
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/704a18d7-6687-49c2-8830-a24aa794303e/tfs-2013-with-access-20072010-cant-create-a-local-tfs-copy?forum=tfsgeneral

Adding data to multiple tables using one form in Access 2010?

Hi All,
I have a access database with two tables and I want to create a single form to enter data into that tables.
How to adding data to multiple tables using one form in Access 2010?
I don't have to much knowledge of access database?
Please help me
Thanks
Balaji

You really don't enter identical data into 2 tables. You enter dat into one single table, and then you have an unique identifier that maps to another table (you have a unique relationship between two tables).
Maybe you need to read this.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-001/access-help/database-design-basics-HA001224247.aspx
Think about it this way... What is you update data in 2 tables, and then the data in one of those tables changes, but the data in the other table does NOT change. WHOOPS!! Now, you've got a BIG problem. For instance, you have a customer
named Bill Gates. In one Table you update Bill's address to 1835 73rd Ave NE, Medina, WA 98039 and in the other table you accidentally update Bill's address to 183 73rd Ave NE, Medina, WA 98039. Now you have 2 addresses for Bill. Why would
you want that??? Which is right? No one knows. If you have one address, you just have to update one address and if there is a mistake, you just have to update one address, but you don't have to waste time trying to figure out which is right
and which is wong...and then update the one that is wrong.
Post back with specific questions.
Knowledge is the only thing that I can give you, and still retain, and we are both better off for it.

Add-in for Access 2010/2013 with Visual Studio 2012 (2013 Preview)

Hello!
Am i right: Microsoft wants to kill Access in favor of Azure/SQL stuff?
I was unable to find any Projects in Visual Studio 2012/2013 to create an Addon for Access 2010 or 2013 (only Word, Excel, Outlook).
There is even no Microsoft.Office.Tools.Access.ApplicationFactory
to install add-in to Access App.
Any solutions for VS 2012?
Or i should use outdated Shared Add-in with VS 2010?
Thank you!

Sorry Donald M from Microsoft,
You need to rethink that response. IDTExtensibility2 is an outdated Office 2003 technology.
Everything EXCEPT the ThisAddIn.designer.cs reference to ApplicationFactory _factory compiles when you switch references in another Office application's VSTO project template to msaccess and dao libraries. Even the Access icon shows up in Visual
Studio 2013. The only reason a Ribbon.xml project will not load into Access is that Microsoft hasn't provided the Microsoft.Office.Tools.Access DLL for it. If you leave the Factory reference pointing to global::Microsoft.Office.Tools.Factory,
the add-in compiles but will not load.
MICROSOFT: Please provide us the missing Factories for MSAccess and OneNote.
Could not create an instance of startup object AccessRibbonAddin.ThisAddIn in assembly AccessRibbonAddin, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=664b6483efff25e6.
************** Exception Text **************
Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.Runtime.CannotCreateStartupObjectException: Could not create an instance of startup object AccessRibbonAddin.ThisAddIn in assembly AccessRibbonAddin, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=664b6483efff25e6.
at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Office.Runtime.DomainCreator.ExecuteCustomization.CreateEntryPoint(String entryPointTypeName)
at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Office.Runtime.DomainCreator.ExecuteCustomization.Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Office.Runtime.Interop.IExecuteCustomization2.LoadEntryPoints(IntPtr serviceProvider)
************** Loaded Assemblies **************
mscorlib
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18052 built by: FX45RTMGDR
CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v4.0.30319/mscorlib.dll
Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Office.Runtime
Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 10.0.40305.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Office.Runtime/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Office.Runtime.dll
System.Core
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.17929 built by: FX45RTMREL
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Core/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Core.dll
System
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18021 built by: FX45RTMGDR
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
System.Configuration
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18060 built by: FX45RTMGDR
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll
System.Xml
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18060 built by: FX45RTMGDR
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll
System.Security
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18055 built by: FX45RTMGDR
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Security/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Security.dll
Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.Hosting
Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 10.0.40305.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.Hosting/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.Hosting.dll
Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.Runtime
Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 10.0.40305.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.Runtime/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.Runtime.dll
System.Deployment
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.17929 built by: FX45RTMREL
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Deployment/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Deployment.dll
Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.ServerDocument
Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 10.0.40305.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.ServerDocument/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualStudio.Tools.Applications.ServerDocument.dll
System.Windows.Forms
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18036 built by: FX45RTMGDR
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll
System.Drawing
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18021 built by: FX45RTMGDR
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
System.Xml.Linq
Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.17929 built by: FX45RTMREL
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml.Linq/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.Linq.dll
Microsoft.Office.Tools
Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 10.0.40305.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.Office.Tools/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.Office.Tools.dll
Microsoft.Office.Tools.Common.Implementation
Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 10.0.40305.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.Office.Tools.Common.Implementation/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.Office.Tools.Common.Implementation.dll
Microsoft.Office.Tools.Common
Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 10.0.40305.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.Office.Tools.Common/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.Office.Tools.Common.dll
AccessRibbonAddin
Assembly Version: 1.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 1.0.0.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/Source/Home/Access/bin/Debug/AccessRibbonAddin.DLL
Microsoft.Office.Tools.Common.v4.0.Utilities
Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 10.0.30319.1
CodeBase: file:///C:/Source/Home/Access/bin/Debug/Microsoft.Office.Tools.Common.v4.0.Utilities.DLL

Insert into Microsoft access 2010 Database on sharepoint using OLEDB

Hi,
want to insert data into a microsoft access web db using oledb object. but the i am unable to open the database.
    dbLoc = "http://XXXX.com/project/design/Test_Web_DB
    Dim strConnection As String = "Provider=Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0;Data Source= " & dbLoc
    Try
            con = New OleDb.OleDbConnection(strConnection)
            If con.State = ConnectionState.Closed Then con.Open()
    Catch ex As OleDbException
           MsgBox("OleDbException: Unable to Open DB")
    End Try
it always go to the exception. is there any problem with the above code??

Hey Bala,
Browsing the link (as shown below) on the browser doesnt open the DB.
http://XXXX.com/project/design/Test_Web_DB.accdb
Instead, without ".accdb" works.
my requirement is something like below, please recommend your suggestion
1. i have a DB on access 2010, which gets updated on regular basis (currently db is on common location) by different VB.net application client my the network
2. i want to create various reports out of the data and want them visible available on sharepoint.
please help
-Manash

How steps for convert an old adp file to accdb in Access 2010/2013

I have a client with an old adp file they are running in Access 2010. Some of their users have moved to Access 2013 and the adp format is no longer supported in that version of access. I have tried searching the web, but I have not found a definitive
set of instructions on how to migrate the content of this adp file to the newer accdb format. I have created a new .accdb went to External data, Import, Access and pulled over all the objects found in that ui. It pulled in tables as well, but it
was my understanding with the adp format all of the tables were in sql server, not access.
Any help would be greatly appreciated to help me figure out how to migrate this content and get rid of the adp file as I am admittedly not very knowledgeable of this adp file format as well!

Thanks for the help Stefan. I was actually able to do this pretty easily by doing a couple of things:
Created a blank new Access DB (MyAccessDB_new_format.accdb)
Opened it and went to the External Data menu, then imported all the objects from the old Access file (MyAccessDB.adp)
Went to View code to see the VBA code and then added the reference to the ADODB library for the code.
Created a new ODBC connection on the PC to the local SQL Server database (called MySQLServerAppDB).
Deleted all the local tables that got imported in the Access db.
Went to the External Data menu, then added all the db objects as linked tables (All the tables now in the access db with the globe icon next to them) and renamed them in Access from default naming schema of "dbo_TableName" to just "TableName".
Tested it and was getting some weird dbo message, so looked at the VBA code and all the queries had schema qualification (i.e.: select * from dbo.table1), so I did a find replace and got rid of "dbo." (found
10 occurrences) and changed any form or report references in their property sheets with dbo in the name and removed "dbo."
Tested it again and then got some weird unique table error message. I just commented this line out and it works fine in my app.
Hope that helps someone!

How to deploy a Desktop Access 2010 app via Azure and RemoteApp?

I currently sell an Access 2010 app that uses the 2010 Access Runtime for deployment on desktop PCs. I very much would like to make it available over the internet on PC/Mac/iPad using the Azure RemoteApp, if possible. The Access app has a number of supporting
files- it’s not just an Access accdb or accde file. For it to work correctly all the supporting files need to be in folders related to the main accde/accdb fie. Those files are a few other accde files, csv, pdf, and some folders.
Each of my clients (a company) may have 1-15 simultaneous users. On the Desktop Access version, I have a Front End accde installed on each workstation and a single Back End accdb data file installed on a shared drive. Each FE workstation is linked to the
single BE data file. I would need to replicate this somehow on an Azure VM (like perhaps have a designated folder for the BE data file that each user account’s FE is linked to?).
I created an Azure VM (server 2012 R2) and installed the Access Desktop App on it. I can access that full VM with RDP (and see the whole desktop, not just my Access app). What I’m trying to figure out is a way to do this with RemoteApp- can RemoteApp use
my Access 2010 app as an available ‘app’ or does the user need to see the whole VM desktop?
As well, in my Azure portal the ‘RemoteApp’ option is grayed out ‘pending approval’ so I can’t test it.
Any help figuring this out would be great. Thanks-

N8827N
I ended up a great solution for this. I'm using 3 Windows Server 2012 R2 VMs to run it as a RemoteApp program. It's set up sort of like this:
VM 1: RD Broker
VM 2: Active Directory (where Users/Groups are created)
VM 3: AppServer (where the Access app is actually located and run on- the VM2/Active Directory 'talks' to the AppServer to create/validate users but all the action happens on VM3).
RemoteApp requires Windows Server 2012 so I don't think it'll work with Server 2008. The great thing about RemoteApp is it opens the Access 2010 Front End in a unique window, all on its own. The user doesn't need to see the Desktop of the server- they just
see the Access Navigation Form(s).
In brief, on the VM3/AppServer I have a unique folder for the backend Access data file and a User Account (created in the VM2 Active Directory) for each user with the frontend Access file in C/Users/Username/AppData.
RemoteApp- when the user logs in via the RemoteApp app- points to that specific user profile's frontend Access db in that location and opens it in its own window on their host computer. And since each FE is linked to a common BE data file everyone uses the
same data, just like in a regular LAN Server FE/BE setup.
It required some changes in the Access app to deal with it- uploading images and files, emailing straight from the app, etc but it was worth it. I also had to pay a development company to set up the 2012 R2 Servers, as I didn't know the details of how to
do that myself. But I'm managing the setup, ongoing, and it's not so hard to do.
So now my customers can run the Access app on a PC, Mac, or iPad pretty much anywhere. Excellent way to extend an Access application..

Access 2010 filter bug

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for