Access point range

What is the distance range that Cisco Access points can cover in metres,km or feet.
eg. how much distance does cisco 1524 AP or a Work group bridge cover?
Where can we find the figures associated with each cisco access point model.
Thanks in advance!

You can find one for the 15xx here, but none for APs I'm general. You need to have a site survey done to really see you coverage.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cisco.com%2Fen%2FUS%2Fdocs%2Fwireless%2Faccess_point%2F1550%2Frange%2Fcalculator%2F1552_Link_Calculator_V1.xls&ei=yAq2UJaBI8XRyQHBlIDACw&usg=AFQjCNHBZEvU5H-As7WSjl3gEYT8I0Qslg&sig2=pa-Dvb9tXUOzXsaTsrTsiQ
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Similar Messages

  • Routers, bridges, access points & range extenders

    The DI-624 has died. It was connected to the telco provided modem. A SMCWGBR14-N is attached to the cable company modem. The plan is to discontinue the telco internet plan and use only the cable company plan.
    But first, I've got to get more range from the SMCWGBR14-N. It's pretty hot, but doesn't have the ability to hook up an external antenna or signal booster (at least not from what I can learn).
    I thought I needed an access point, but if I read the descriptions correctly, an access point needs a hardwire connection to a router or modem.
    I thought I needed a bridge, but as the term implies, it is a device for connecting networks usually over a larger distance.
    So that leads me to the range extender, which I think is designed to increase the range of the wireless router, without having to hardwiring required. But I keep running into info that notes most range extenders "slow the network". I'm assuming this means the range extender does not allow the same thru-put speeds as the wireless router, but I'm guessing.
    What device(s) will increase my router's wireless reach, without killing performance?
    Thanks in advance for all tips, corrections and suggestions.

    Thanks for the reply. I had considered power over ethernet, and SMC makes a PoE system, but it requires 2 units (if I read the specs correctly) and drives the cost up over $300.
    Link Sys offers the following:
    "Power over Ethernet support makes it easy to install -- you can mount the Access Point anywhere, even without ready access to a power plug. With appropriate Power Over Ethernet support at the other end, you only need to run one cable to the Access Point to deliver both data and power. Of course, you can also use the included AC adapter if your installation point has power available nearby."
    Now I have an idea of what is being discussed, but only a vague idea what it means in the rather obscure discussion of using an AC adapter and need to run one cable to the Access Point.
    As a general practice, an Access point, similar to the LinkSys WAP4400N or WAP200 or WAP2000, requires a second unit that is connected to the alternating current power system of the building. Is that a correct statement?
    Thanks.

  • Apple TV 2G (Airplay and Homesharing) can only stream from devices on the same wireless access point range??

    connection:
    40 Mbps Fiber Broadband connection using:
    Devices:
    1. Main Modem/router (AP1): Huawei HG8245 (provided by ISP) - Wireless enabled.
    2. Remote Access point (AP2): Linksys/Cisco E3200 Wireless gigabyte router flashed with DD-WRT v24-sp2 (06/14/11) mini (Cascaded -wired- LAN to LAN from main modem).
    3. Wireless Repeater to cover a dead spot  (AP3): Linksys/Cisco E1000 wireless repeater.
    4. Apple Tv (AT2G) with home sharing/airplay enabled.
    5.( Ipad) with home sharing on itunes enabled.
    6. Win7 (PC) using iTunes with Home sharing enabled.
    all devices are updated to their latest firmware.
    In order to cover a large 3 story house with Wifi. I had (AP1) is located on the first floor, while (AP2) is located in the basement floor directly wired by LAN to LAN with (AP1). (AP3) is located on the Ground floor away from the living room to repeat wireless network into the back yard. While (AT2G) is located in the living room on the ground floor right in the middle of both (AP1) + (AP2) while connected via Wifi.
    Network SSID, security, passphrase and wireless settings of (AP2) are identical to (AP1) to create a single big LAN/WLAN roaming network where all devices connected to both wireless access points can find/share the others. As understood, it's refered to as bridging.
    I have noticed that my iphone/ipad does not show the airplay button anywhere within the wireless network. it seems that the apple TV randomly choses to connect to the AP with stronger signal, or switch to the other in case of a reboot to one of them.
    to elaborate further, if i was sitting in the living room (groundfloor), trying to airplay some you tube contents via Wifi to my Apple TV, i may not find the airplay button available all the time, i found out the reason is while i'm wirelessly connected to AP1, the Apple TV was connected to AP2 and both deviced cannot detect each others to enable my purpose. that goes the same for Home Sharing. only if my Ipad/PC and Apple Tv are on the same wireless AP. they would detect each others immediately.
    although, the second AP (AP2) is suppose to extend my wireless network of the same subnet in which any device connected can be found.
    After all sorts of trial and error tweaking my router/access point, I thought the problem would be due to the Linksys 3200 capability of bridging WLAN and lacks few protocols that enables my purpose. i have flashed the firmware to a DD-WRT, but again, problem was not solved.
    I have not tried having my Apple Tv wired to either router/AP, but i assume it may work well if i do so. i still need to solve this wireless connection issue though.
    Am i the only one with this problem, would there be something wrong with my setup? 
    Your feedback is highly appreciated.

    You may or may not already have your network set up correctly, it's just that I can't tell from what you have said.
    I have a main router provided by my ISP, I have several other Airport Extremes and Airport expresses connected by Ethernet, all set up to bridge the network created by the main router.
    Each maker has their own settings, but bridging should be reasonably obvious. In simple terms my main router distributes IP addresses to all devices, the Airports bridge that network by passing these addresses to the devices from the main router. A base station that isn't in bridging mode will distribute its own addresses to the devices connected to it.
    I don't really follow your next point.
    instruction for configuration vary from manufacturer to manufacturer, the best course of action here is to refer to the manual. If everything is set up properly the addresses of everything on your network will have identical sets of numbers for the first 3 of 4 groups of numbers that make up an address, the last set must always be different. I think the part you are referring to with your DD-WRT is the option to have Ethernet and wifi bridged or not.
    Some routers may be easier to configure than others, but generally speaking they should all work with the Apple TV. 5Ghz is less likely to suffer interference but it is much more likely to be blocked by solid objects, it may or may not be an advantage.

  • Airport Express and Range Extenders and Access points.

    My setup is as follows
    Main wireless router is a Dlink DIR-635, with SSID 'id1'
    A Edimax range extender, with SSID 'id2'
    A small network with a PC and a mediaplayer connected to a Jensen router acting as a switch. This network is connected to the wireless network with SSID 'id1'
    through a TP-Link access point.
    I want to stream music from my PCs and Ipad to the Express using Airplay.
    The 'id2' network has the best signal in the room where I want the Express.
    Connected the Express to this network, but it didn't show up as an available speaker neither on the Ipad nor on my PCs.
    Connected the Express to the other network 'id1'. Now it shows up on my Ipad and a portabel PC. Both connected to network with SSID 'id2'.
    But the PC connected to the wireless network through the TP-link, is still unable to find the Express.
    Does this sound familiar to anyone?
    What protocoll does Airplay use? Does the Express send any broadcast messages to inform other devices that is is in the network?
    Seems to me that the Airplay protocoll is filtered by the extender and the access point.
    Any hints will be appreciated.

    If you are asking about "extending" or "repeating" the wireless signal, you will need both an Apple main router and an Apple extending device.
    The AirPort Express (and other Apple routers) can only "extend" a wireless signal from another Apple router.

  • Best practice for having an access point giving out only a specific range

    Hey All,
    I have an access point which is currently set to relay all dhcp request to the server DC-01, However the range that has been setup is becoming low on available IP addresses so I have been asked if it is possible to setup another range for the AP only.
    Is there a way to set the DHCP up with a new range and say anything from that access point it will then give out a 192.168.2 subnet address as apposed to the standard 192.168.1 subnet?
    Or would it be easier / better to create a superscope? and slowly migrate the users to a new subnet with a larger range?
    Any help suggestions would be appreciated
    thanks
    Anthony

    Hi,
    Maybe we could configure a DHCP superscope to achieve your target.
    For details, please refer to the following articles.
    Configuring a DHCP Superscope
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd759168.aspx
    Create a superscope to solve the problem of dwindling IP addresses
    http://www.techrepublic.com/article/create-a-superscope-to-solve-the-problem-of-dwindling-ip-addresses/
    Best Regards,
    Andy Qi
    Andy Qi
    TechNet Community Support

  • Need help finding wired access point or range extender?

    I currently have a EA6500 in a rather large home.  (4500 sq ft)   The router is on one side of the house and my office is on the other side of the house where wireless does not work well.   I am trying to use Samsung Tablet but the connection keeps dropping here.  when I move the tablet closer it works fine.
    Is there a range extender/access point I can purchase to use with the EA6500 where I can connect device via wired ethernet?
    If I connect range extender/access point to EA6500 router via wireless the signal in my office appears too weak to be extended properly?  I tried the RE1000 but was not successful.
    Please let me know if there is another product to try.
    Thank you.

    Was this extender working fine before and you’re trying to reconfigure its settings? In order for this to work properly, the wireless settings for the main router should be synchronized to it. After making sure that the wireless settings are synchronized, place the extender to an area in between the router and where you want to repeat the signal. If you will encounter connection problems after setting up the extender, you can reset the extender and reconfigure the settings. Make sure as well that the firmware is upgraded. For more info about setting up the range extender, you can refer to the following links:  What to do before manually setting up your range extender, Setting up the range expander without the installation CD, Getting to Know the WRE54G v3.

  • How do I make my AirPort Extreme a access point?

    I just bought a Time Capsule and now I want to extend my range of my network.  How do I make my AE an access point?

    In this case, you will want to configure both base stations in an extended network.
    Dynamic WDS - Extending a Wireless Network Setup
    If practical, place the base stations in near proximity to each other during the setup phase. Once done, move them to their desired locations.
    Open AirPort Utility, and then, select the base station that will connect to the Internet.
    Choose Manual Setup from the Base Station menu, or double-click the base station to open the configuration in a separate window. Enter the base station password if necessary.
    Click AirPort in the toolbar, and then, click Wireless.
    Choose “Create a wireless network” from the Wireless Mode pop-up menu, and then, select the “Allow this network to be extended” checkbox.
    Next, select the base station that will extend this network, and then, choose Manual Setup from the Base Station menu, or double-click the base station to open its configuration in a separate window. Enter the base station password if necessary.
    Choose “Extend a wireless network” from the Wireless Mode pop-up menu, and then, choose the network you want to extend from the Network Name pop-up menu.
    Enter the base station network and base station password if necessary.
    Click Update to update the base station with new network settings.
    (ref: Pages 43-44 of Apple AirPort Networks.)

  • Setting up a netgear n300 as wireless bridge/access point with airport extremee

    I just replaced my netgear wireless router with the airport to allow our many devices on the network without knocking each other off and also increase the speed.  But would like to use the netgear as a wireless bridge or access point so that I can still connect my NTFS formatted hard drive to be shared on the network.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.  I can not seem to find my netgear router with 192.168.1.1 as that comes up with another device.  I have tried doing this with a windows laptop in another room but can not seem to make it work.  I am now hooked up directly to the airport thinking i need to do it that way and still no luck. Please help.

    As long as you intend to do this over ethernet it will work.. you cannot easily wireless repeat or bridge to an apple router.. you would need specific hardware to do it.
    What is the exact model of netgear you have?
    The setup method depends on the functionality of the router.. but lets assume it does not have a bridge or WAP mode.
    You use WAN bypass.
    1. Setup the Netgear with IP address in the correct IP range for the rest of the network.. it is hard to talk generalities so lets say the apple is main router and your network is now 10.0.1.x .. then set the Netgear to 10.0.1.250 (apple uses IP 2-200 by default) you can use any value you like outside the DHCP range. Up to the limit which is 254 as long as you keep track of all static IP devices. Apply this setting and power cycle the router.. and you might need to power cycle the computer as well to pick up the new IP.
    2. Turn off the DHCP server in the Netgear. You may lose connection to the netgear now.. do not worry about it.. (this can be combined with one.. if you firstly turn off dhcp before you change the IP.. but whatever is possible.. at some point you will need to change around and if you forget what IP .. you will be in a mess.. so write it on a label and stick on the base of the router.. also without dhcp you will either need to reset router to factory using reset button or use static ip on the computer. )
    3. Plug ethernet from LAN of the main router to LAN of the Netgear. Reboot the whole network is often necessary.
    4. In your computer plugged somewhere in the network.. open browser and go to the address you set.. 10.0.1.250 in my example.
    5. You can then setup the Netgear to do whatever you like.. DIsk access is fine.. wireless is fine.. it just cannot be a router.
    Many many reboots if you get lost. Hit reset and start over.

  • How to use Home Hub 3 as a 2nd router(access point...

    Hi guys hope you can help; I am trying to add my Home Hub 3 as a 2nd router (ie an access point) to my home network and struggling.
    What am I trying to achieve.
    I have a fully functioning home network which is working great but the wireless range does not extend to the room above my garage, some distance away from the main house. I currently service it with an Ethernet link from my E4200 router, via the mains wiring, to link to a PS3 there. But I want to extend this to have a wireless network in the remote room so I can link multiple devices - rather than spend more money, deploying a 2nd router which I already have  is preferable.
    What have I got.
    I have a Linksys E4200 router (nice piece of kit) attached to my ADSL line via a Belkin N1 wireless modem-router set to  “modem only” mode (I was using a DSL modem until yesterday but that went AWOL and digging out the Belkin router I saw that it had a modem only function – and it/they worked first time )
    All of my gear in the house is attached wirelessly to the E4200 which is delivering circa 11.5mbps from a maximum of 12.5mbps for the line measured by BT onsite. So  all is  fine there.
    What have I done to try and use the HH3
    Linked an Ethernet cable between one of the Ethernet ports on the E4200 to a mains plug.
    Linked an Ethernet cable from a mains plug to one of the Ethernet ports on the HH3 router.
    Ie as the PS3 was linked.
    3.  Switched on the HH3 router: the power light is solid blue, the wireless light is solid blue, the broadband light is off
    4. Connected my laptop to the HH3 network and loading up a web page on IE9 displays a web page from bthomehub.home/etc etc with title BT Home Hub and a message “Can’t connect to Broadband”. It is the start of a self- diagnostic routine. Answering all the questions I eventually get a Home Hub Administrative Home Page displayed.
    Is there a quicker way of getting to this admin page??
    5.  I switched off DHCP
    I changed the IP address from 192.168.1.254 to 192.168.1.200 as this seems to be what the other threads on this subject did.
    When I went to apply the change a message came up telling me that I might not be able to access the HH3. I ploughed on disregarding this and needless to say I could not then access the HH3 via the web interface and trying to access a web site nothing happened.
    6.  I did a hardware reset on the HH3
    7. Going through the motions again, when I got to the admin pages again, I switched off DHCP and this time left the IP address alone, ie 192.168.1.254.
    When I went to apply this  I got the message
    “After changing these settings you will need to renew the IP address of all devices connecting to your BT Home Hub. Please follow the instructions provided with your devices.”
    I applied the change – but have not yet done any fooling around with IP addresses on my laptop because I don’t want to start mucking around with my laptop
    I then tried to access a website, and failed, but on this occasion rather than nothing happening, the Home Hub website came up  again displaying the error message page.
    And that is where I stand. All looks so easy when reading other threads on this and other forums but it is not working for me.
    Any help greatly appreciated.
    The IP settings on the E4200 are
    IP  192.168.1.1
    Range  192.168.1.100  to 192.168.1.149
    Also connection type on the E4200 is POE not POA – as far as I  recall that is what it needed to be to connect to the DSL modem and work.

    Thanks for the speedy reply!
    I have actually came across this page before - I seem to hit a snag when I connect the repeater hub (my HH3).  As outlined, I have at all times kept the repeater hub connected via ehternet into one of the regular LAN ports to my main HH5.
    But when I connect my laptop to the repeat hub (HH3), I am actually connected to the internet somehow (I assuem using the HH5 network) but under my network connections it says I am connected to the HH3.  As a result, when I go to the homehub settings page 192.168.1.254, it brings me to the main HH5 settings page and not the repeater HH3.
    According to the instructions it says I should "Ignore the not connected page", but I am connected and I cant seem to alter any of the settings on my HH3 while it is connected to the HH5.
    Any other pointers?
    Thanks!

  • Newly installed OS 10.3.1.1565 - Where have all my Access Points gone?

    I have a 2 access points at home, 1 is my original modem, and the other is my Dual Channel Netgear router. This provides access points on the 2.4Ghz channel and on the 5Ghz channel - all of which you can give different access point names and security passcodes if you wish. On top of this, there's also provision for a guest account on each band, which again can be named anything you want.
    Anyway, before my Z10 automatically download and installed OS10.3.1.1565 last week, my phone could see and report all 5 of my access points (via Wifi Analyser). Now, with this O.S., it refuses to report all 5 access points and will only display the AP that's connected. It does however show me all my neighbours AP names. It just hides my 4 idle APs - as presumably it knows they're all part of the same network. I've tried various WIFI analysers but they ALL behave in the same manner. This appears to be a function of the phone's O.S.
    As I walk around the house, the phone does drop the weak AP and suddenly discover and report my alternate AP - though It's very cumbersome. I liked being able to see all of my APs on WIFI Analyser as it helped build confidence that I had reasonable coverage around the house. Now with this O.S. I feel like I've lost 4 access points.
    I don't understand why my phone now disregards 4 of my access points and doesn't display them through any of the WIFI Analyser tools.  My various other devices around the house (all running WIFI Analyser) report the signal strength of all 5 access points.  I've tried toggling the 'Inter Access point Handover' setting, as well as enabling IPV6, but to no avail.  I hope this isn't the design intent, and that one day I can view all 5 of my APs again.

    Completely disappeared.  Not listed in the Networks and Connections screen.
    This just lists the currently connected Access Point.  WIFI Analyser does the same - it appears that 4 of my access points don't exist.
    That is until I walk out of range of the connected AP, and the phone suddenly displays the next AP and hides the previous one.
    Before this update, I could see all 5 APs from anywhere in the house (albeit at various signal strengths)

  • Home sharing works on primary wifi but not via Access Point

    I have two wifi routers set up at either ends of the house.  The primary router (Netgear DGN2000) is connected to an Access Point (Edimax EW-7416APN) via a D-link Powerline ethernet connection.  Both are configured with identical SSID names/passwords meaning I get seamless switching between the units when walking from one end of the house to the other.  Internet connectivity works fine when connected to either unit on laptop, phone and ipad.
    The only issue I am having is with itunes Home Sharing.  My main PC is connected to the primary router via a further D-link Powerline ethernet connection.  When I am within the wifi signal of the primary router, the Home Sharing library from the Main PC shows on my ipad2 and I can access all music no problem.  However, if I walk to the other end of the house whilst playing a track then as soon as the wifi connection switches to the AP then the track will stop.  When I search for libraries then the Home Sharing library doesn't show.
    The Access Point is set to be in AP mode. The latest version of itunes is installed.  The PC is running Windows XP
    Any pointers anyone can give with this issue would be very welcomed as our main entertaining room is in the range of the AP wifi.

    Do the old "forget this network" while on your home wifi, then reconnect to it.    If that doesn't fix it, it's prob a router/internet issue at your home.    Would need some more info to help futher troubleshoot.

  • Cisco AIR-1141-E-k9 access points

    Hi,
    Facing an issue with 1141. Not sure if it is from AP or from the Laptops!
    Problem is when some users are trying to connect their laptops to wireless it shows Limited connectivity and didnt take an IP address. But with some users its obsolutly working fine.
    I'm facing this issue only at one of the site. We have other sites working fine without any interruptions.
    Checked the security:
    Using WPA/TKIP  
    Cisco IOS Software, C1140 Software (C1140-K9W7-M), Version 12.4(25d)JA, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Thu 09-Dec-10 15:24 by prod_rel_team
    System returned to ROM by reload
    System image file is "flash:/c1140-k9w7-mx.124-25d.JA/c1140-k9w7-mx.124-25d.JA"
    BR

    Tried couple of times, still the same.
    Let me brief ma scenerio:
    Router 881 ( DHCP server ) vlan 14 ---- Access switch 2960 ---- AIR-1141 access point --- clients (Laptops)
    #switchport is configure as vlan 14.
    #Access point mgmt IP configured in vln14 range . And it is accociated in access point vlan1 (Native).
    BR

  • Is there any way I can control which specific access point I connect (and stay connected) to from amongst a set of access points with the same SSID?

    I'm working from a boat in a harbor in which the ISP has deployed numerous access points around the periphery.  All the access points share the same SSID and each is configured to use either channel 1, 6 or 11.   From my location, there are over a dozen of these access points "visible" (based on the the output of WiFi Scanner) with a range of RSSI and S/N values that vary over time.
    The ISP has told me that the quality of my connection should be "perfectly fine" for any access point with an RSSI value better than -75, but I know from experience that my connection quality is miserable (i.e. < 50Kbps download) for almost all of these, including those with RSSI values better than -75.  There is at least one exception, however, which gives me on the order of 2Mbps download, which is "great" in this context.
    I've tried using a more powerful USB antenna plugged into my MacBook Air (mid 2011), but as far as I can tell, it really doesn't make much difference.  Neither does my location within the boat.   The overriding factor seems to be which access point I happen to connect up to.
    I should point out that the closest access points are about 75 yards away, with many of them being several hundred yards away or more.  I'm guessing that even though the signal strength of some of the distant access points is causing them to get "chosen" some times, the results are unacceptable due to the distance.
    I'm hoping that I can determine, through experimentation, which access point(s) provide(s) acceptable performance and then configure my Mac to limit my connection to those points through whatever mechanism I need to use (e.g. channel, MAC id, etc.).

    Establishing a wireless connection with a client computer is left to the access point for various reasons. One reason that your Mac may not connect to the strongest access point is that it may have reached a limit of the number of clients it can serve, leaving it unable to accept a connection with another. The limit may not be very large.
    Suppose that happens, and your Mac establishes a connection with a more distant access point having a weaker signal. Then, suppose a client drops off the network. Doesn't this mean your Mac will switch to the stronger access point? Not necessarily. The throughput delivered to and from your Mac would have to drop below a threshold specified in the AP for it to drop the client, leaving your Mac free to connect with another one. The reason for this is to prevent rapid switching from one AP to another in an area in which two signals are of approximately equal quality. If that were to occur the frequent and repetitive handshaking between the two devices would slow throughput to zero.
    In an environment in which several access points are broadcasting the same SSID, Apple provides no insight as to how it determines which access point to choose. This is the reason I suspect this "choice" is a function of the router, or access point. The connection originates with it, not the Mac.
    Now, what would solve your dilemma would be to determine a way to control the access point with which your Mac connects, by specifying the access point's unique MAC address for example. In this happy circumstance, you could maintain an editable "whitelist" or "blacklist" of the harbor's access points and be able to choose which among them you prefer.
    I do not believe OS X maintains such a record of MAC addresses though, only those of the routers it uses. If I am correct about that, such a solution is unlikely to exist. Don't let that discourage you from searching for one though... I would concentrate on something like "selecting access point by specific MAC address".
    I did find this patent application though:
    Roaming Network Stations Using A Mac Address Identifier To Select New Access Point
    Perhaps it's a start

  • Do I need a router or access point / bridge?

    Hi.  We have a MS small bus server with a software firewall.  It does dhcp and routes traffic so we don't need the router part of the router.
    Wireless  N access is needed.  Will a DAP 1522 (Wireless N access point / switch) offer the same wireless performance as a Linksys wireless N router?
    I just bought the DAP access point and am getting 100-130 mb/s with a strong signal.  Would the router work better with its giant antennae?
    Nick

    DAP 1522 is a good acess point. It  lets you connect up to 4 Ethernet-enabled devices such as set top boxes, game consoles, or computers to an existing Wi-Fi network for on-demand broadcast, online gaming, or media streaming throughout the home.
    With dual-band wireless capabilities, the DAP-1522 is ideal for wireless HD video streaming and gaming applications because entertainment content can be sent over the less crowded 5GHz band.
    The DAP-1522 can also be used to create a new 802.11n wireless network using its Access Point feature. Simply connect it to an existing wired or wireless router, and you'll enjoy greater range and data speeds in seconds.

  • Using the WAP300N access point in combination with a WES610N Media Bridge

    Here is the situation: 
    I live on a small farm and have an office separate from my main house.  My current router is a EA4500 and it is located in the office which is approximately 45 feet from the main house.  Current wireless signal strength at the interior wall closest to the office is nominally -55 to -50 dBm but drops off dramatically on the other side of the house.  I currently have a WES610N media bridge on the far side of the house that is supporting a DVR and TV.  The WES610N is receiving signal from the router but it is weak.  Wireless network site survey indicates only 4-6% reception whcih I'm assuming is somewhere around -80 dBm based on measurments I made using a WiFi analyzer app on my tablet. 
    I had an RE1000 that bit the dust.  What I'd like to do is increase the wireless signal strength in the main house without running a wired connection from the office.  I'm considering purchasing a WAP300N Access Point which will also function as an range externder.  However, I am curious if there is any merit/efficeincy in also buying an additional WES610N Media Bridge an then connecting the WAP300N to the additional WES610N bridge and to allow the WAP300 N to serve as an acutual access point. 
    Any thoughts on whether that would gain anything or would I be better suited by simply using the WAP300N as an extender??

    Your planned bridge - wap combo is better than using a range extender. Using an extender would expand the signal but it would cut the bandwidth into half. So, using the bridge-wap combo, it would expand the range without loosing bandwidth quality. It should be the same setup with an extender from where you'll place the combo at the edge of the wireless signal from your main network. But same rules about wireless signal and connectivity, it is prone to wireless interference. 
    If your house is running on same circuit line, you can also consider using a powerline adapter. For information about powerline adapter, you can check this Article. It would eliminate deadspots better compared to the previous setup above. But this is just another option that you could take a look at. 
    Hope this helps.
    If everyone needs to believe in something, I believe I'll have another beer..

Maybe you are looking for