Access Sequence - Exclusive

Hello Guys,
I have got a question, this might sound a little easy for sap Gurus.
The exclusive indicator prevents the system from reading the
condition records ,if it found value for existing condition
table.It is a control for the system to access condition
record from the database.
EX--:If you assign an exclusive indicator option for a
condition table in access sequence ,and if the system finds
condition records for condition table in access sequence
,then system does not go to the next condition table .
My question is what if we do not check the exclusive, how does it behave??
Will it search all the conditions records and after search which one will it consider??
Many Thanks in advance
Abhi

Hi Abhi,
referring to your question
-My question is what if we do not check the exclusive, how does it behave??
In this case system will populate all the condition records int he access sequence but will activate only one them with a green signal and others will have yellow signals.
I do not have SAP access right now but it is sure that either system will  activate the first one or the last condition  record.
It is a SAP standard functionality that only one basic price can be there in a line item,so for this reason other will be deactivated(yellow signal).
Hope it clears
Mohit Singh

Similar Messages

  • What is the result this in access sequence exclusive not marked

    Hi Gurus,
    In pricing access sequence v/07 if we did not mark the exclusion what will hapeen.  In that access sequence it contain 3 tables i did not mark as exlusion what will happen.  What is the result of this. 
    Thanks &  Regards
    Points will be rewarded

    Hi lakshmi pathi
    Thanks for your replay.  When am maintaining condition record in vk11 all condition recordds  coming.  In that am selecting am maintaing.  Even though if i put exclusive indicator in access sequcne even though same records am getting in the same order.\
    please clarify on this
    Thanks & Regards
    points will be rewarded

  • What is use of exclusion indicator in access sequence

    what is use of exclusion indicator in access sequence, if we tick this indicator what will happen to pricing procedure..

    Hi sahu
    If you are having more than one condition tables i.e accesss in your access sequence and if you put exclusion indicator in any of the starting tables then system wont search further as it stops searching.
    Ex : say you are having condition tables 501, 502,503
    and you have put exclusion indicator at 502 . then system will start searching from 501 then next it goes to 502 and it stops there and it wont search further.as you have put exclusion indicator at 502.
    But if you have put exclusion indicator to all accesss i.e., conditon tables then system will search from the 1st access and stops at the last access and if any valid condition record is not found in the last record then the system will take the previous conditon table record
    Regards
    Srinath

  • New Access Sequence for Free Goods Determination

    Hi Guru's,
    I Have  a scenario wherein i have to maintain the free Goods Condition records in VBN1 with a new access sequence namely Customer/Distribution Channel/Plant/material.
    I have maintained all the necessary settings such as Free Goods Activation for Item Category, Assignment of free goods pricing procedure to my sales area,Positioning of R100 condition type in my pricing procedure with relevenat routines.
    At my Sale order level after maintaining the free goods condition record in VBN1 in new access sequence, my free goods determination is not happening and at the sme time if i maintain it in the standard access sequence i.e. in Sales Org/Dist.Channel/Customer/material the free goods are getting determined.
    Can anybody help me out in this..
    Regards
    Bhushan

    Hi
    There arew 2 things to be done or checked
    1. Position your access sequence before the standard one by giving step nos accordingly
    2.In the existing sequence check for the exclusive indicator in the standard sequence and i think that is ticked in your case
    Hence after getting the condition record in the standard sequence the system stops searching for the new records in your new access sequence
    If that is the casethen remove exclusive indicator from the standard one and tick the same in your new access sequence
    By this you can get the condition records of your new access sequence without positioning
    Pls reply whether mu suggestion has helped you
    Raja

  • New Access Sequence

    Dear Team,
    I have created New Access Sequence ZJTX copy of JTAX. As below
    1. Query-1
    No.               table               Description                             
    10     363     Plant/Vendor/Material
    20     900     Plant/Tax Code
    30     910     Plant/Vendor/Matl Group
    50     930     Plant/Vendor
    Having exclusive indicator to 10, 20 & 30.
    But when I maintain condition in FV11 like JVRD & create Purchase order. It DOES NOT show me taxes.
    2. Query-2
    I am not able to Create combination Plant/vendor/country/region. For Region Doc field is Empty. Status Indicator is Red.
    Pls suggest
    Thanks
    Tushar

    Dear TEam,
    I have created new Condition Table 960: tax code/plant/vendor/mateiral
    1. When I maintain any table created by me in Access Sequence ZJTX, warning message comes
    The field assignment has not yet been made
    Message no. VK376
    Diagnosis
    Field assignment has not yet been carried out.
    System Response
    When using this access sequence, the system can never find a record for this access (sequential number 04 table 960)
    Procedure
    Branch to field level and make the field assignment.
    Pls suggest urgently whats wrong
    Regards

  • New Access Sequence for Tax based on material Group

    Hello All,
    Our requirement is that we tax our employees on apparel only if the value is greater than $50.00.
    To achieve this, we created a new tax condition table (953 which is copied from 053) and assigned it to access 09 in the access sequence ZTX1 (created w/ref from TAXJ). We added material group (MATKL) to the condition table and selected exclusion indicator for the access.
    We created the condition record in FV11.
    When we created the sales order, the new access sequence (09) is not being accessed. It gives a message "Access not made (initialized field)" Message 102(VE).
    Please advise if we are missing something.
    Thanks,
    Leela

    Hi Leela,
    Are you creating sales order in the same system like
    You have created table in Development system in same system your are creating sales order
    If you are creating here you just go to V/07 transaction then slect your access sequence go in to the tables detail screen here you select your table 953 then click on fields here you check all the fields are available correctly or not then save the changes.
    Now try
    or
    You transported these confugaration to other system like Quality or Production here and you are creating the sales order,
    If you are creating here you need to create condition table again then try.
    I hope it will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Billing Output Access Sequence behaving differently in VF01 Vs VF02

    Hi All,
    Scenario: For RD00 output  from G2 Credit memos there is a customised access sequence. At the top as a first sequence a new table was added with fields as  Sales Org/Billing Types/ Billed-to/ Order Reason. All the required changes to add 'order reason' in field catalogue and in output structures are done with development. System allows to maintain required output master record in VV31 as required.
    Issue: Upon creating a credit memo the output access sequence ignores the newly added first table at the top (most specific) and jumps to the second one and output gets determined with second access although it should have considered the first one first. (Exclusive indicator marked for each step in Acc Seq) This is the case when the credit memo is seen in VF03 upon creation. But if the same document is opened in change mode VF02 it corrects the output and as required the first access gets determined.
    Please advise what could be different in VF01 Vs VF02 as the first leads to wrong output and the later determines the right one, keeping all settings same.
    Thanks,
    Hemant

    This is a bit of a long shot, but hereu2019s an idea. 
    The problem may be that your order reason gets populated by a user exit in the billing document creation process, and this user exit has not yet executed when the output determination kicks off. 
    Put a break point in the user exit.  If an output from the second key combination is already determined when the break point is reached, then the source of the problem is confirmed.
    Regards,
    Ken

  • JCST access sequence

    Hi all.
    We are currently using JCST condition to determine taxes in India.
    JCST access sequence included in JCST condition has got three accesses (Fisrt seems to be for domestic, next for export business). Normally when the first is not determined, goes to the next sequence and so on.
    The thing is that we have got an export sale order and as the system determines the first access sequence it stops here but this access is not for export, is domestic (Origin country/plant region/destination region/customer tax clasf/ material tax clasif). this is an standard.
    I notice that if I fill the requirement field with a value "7" (domestic) in teh first sequence the next would be determined.
    My question is: can I do that, modifying the standard? Is there any update missing iun my system? Why isn´t filled as standard?
    Many thank in advance and best regards.

    hi,
    Tick that exclusion indicator and recheck the process
    Regards,
    Sudhir

  • Access sequence

    Dear Gurus
    what is the use of exclusive in access sequence.
    Thanks in advance
    Sneha Reddy

    Hi,
       when u check exclusive box, that means if the system finds the record then it will not serach further for condition Records.
      Eg, Take the std access seq PR02,
      This PR02 is having 3 condition tables 305, 306 and 304. If u check the exclusive box in all three condition tables and if u maintain the records in VK11, Then if the sytem finds the condition record in the first condition table(305 which is checked with exclusive box), it will not search the records further.
    For eg: if u dont check the exclusive box then the systemm searches and takes all the condition records in to the sales order, and the condition record that is found at the last will be taken as the base price.
    Reward points if it is help ful,
    Regards,
    sree

  • Importance of a Excluive in Access Sequence

    Hi Floks,
    I would like to know :
    Q) What is the importance of the Excluive check box in the access sequence.
    quick responce would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Krish

    Hi,
          It s a very imp control. In the access sequence for the various condition tables it contains, once a valid record is found the system would not go further down the access sequence. Thus it optimizes the performance of the access sequence.
    Eg. Cust/Mat and Cust/Mat/Dist Cha tables are there. If we tick the exclusive indicator once the valid ie. most specific record is found, the contrl comes out of the access sequence and goes for further processing.
    Hope it helps. Please reward if useful
    Thanks & Regards
    Sadhu Kishore

  • Pricing Condition - Skip Access Sequence

    I have a pricing condition that is assigned an access sequence but for certain business areas, we want to skip over the access sequence and use a value from a custom table.  Is there a way to do this with a pricing requirement on the condition in the pricing procedure?
    Currently, because the access sequence is assigned to the pricing condition, even if it does not meet the requirements, it is no hitting my Condition Value code to look at the custom table.
    When I remove the access sequence from the pricing condition configuration, it does hit the code.  I need to be able to do both.
    Thanks in advance,
    Pam

    I apologize Pam, my response actually contradicted itself. Once it skips the access sequence it then skips the condition, along with skipping the alt. calc. etc.
    To get this to work happily together there's a number of options.
    You could have the access sequence be not exclusive, so when that is skipped it will move down to the next access sequence (which you'd define with less detail so it will be "true"). Only thing here is when it is not skipped, then both access sequqnces will fire.
    More of an ABAP route would be do attempt most of this checking in the Price Proc Rqmt & AltCalc code. Possible have the requirement set a variable for your condition that the Alt Calc would then act upon.
    This is all off the top of my head, by I know you can get it to work properly. It's not that crazy of a requirement

  • Access sequence requirement

    Hi Team-Need little coding assistance for this scenario.
    Scenario:
    Condition ZHM1 (Negative Discount type) Access Sequence ZHM1- Table A901 (cust/Material/ end User), 902 (Customer/sales org/ Sales Deal), 903 ( Dvn). If I have condition records for ZHM1 , -12 % (A901), -10 % (A902). Then in my sales order system will list -12% because of Condition Exclusion procedure of type B. We have removed the exclusion indicator in the access sequence to derive this. This Condition type can be user editable in Sales order.
    Ideally because of condition exclusion system looks for all the table and checks the best possible discount.
    Requirement:
    If there is no condition record, then system will not list condition type for user editable in Sales order. This is the problem.
    To avoid this, we would like to create a condition record with Zero amount at A903 (Dvn) level. But, the problem is if I have a Zero record and -12, -10 then system always takes best discount as Zero because of condition Exclusion type B.
    Now , we thought of writing a code at Access sequence as a REQUIREMENT and attach this to A903 Table.
    New Rotuine- should work like this.
    If it finds condition records for it's above steps then don't execute condition.
    If it did not finds condition Record for it's above steps, then only A903 record should be executable.
    Hope this is clear for you.
    Reg
    Siva

    The logic looks OK, check with the ABAP'er, who can develop the code for this. The new routine can be developed in t.code VOFM -> Menu requirements -> pricing. If you need any coding details, then I would suggest, close the thread here and post in ABAP forum.
    Regards,

  • Access sequence experts ?

    In SPRO if you go to access sequece screen
    I am seeing fields condition,i/o, doc struture,Doc field,..............etc.
    In condition field - HIENR
    In doc.field  - HIENR01 but suppose to be doc.field- HIENR.
    why is that and how can I do that? what is the reason to use HIEN01 instead of HIENR
    Please .
    Thanks
    Kris

    This is the improvement of hierarchy condition after 3.1. You can maintain all hierarchy condition within one table (refer to table 64, 65). HIENR represents hierarchy structure not doc field, providing greater flexibility for hierarchy condition.
    When you choose HIENR as a key in a condition table, you need to input document field(hierarchy level 1-26) in the access sequence. Configure this as follows:
    In V/07, add the table (with HIENR key) you defined for access sequence, then press "doc.field" button, select HIENR01 for first access, HIENR02 for the second..up to 26 hierarchy levels available. Activate all exclusion checkbox.
    HIENR1 means the lowest level of hierarchy structure, HIENR2 the second lowest level..
    Condition record applies from Top down. e.g. If you maintain record for HIENR05, it applies to all sub-hierarchy from level 5 to 1. If HIENR01 is maintained, system takes this and stop searching other accesses.

  • PR00 Access sequence Condition table changed

    Hi Friends,
    Someone changed the PR00 Access Sequence Table Settings..
    It shows as
    Ac   Tab   Descripion     Reqirement     Exclusive
    5     305   cus/mat                                      checked
    10   5       cus/mat                                     checked
    20   6       price/cur/mat                               checked
    30   6       price/cur/mat                               checked
    40   4       material                                       checked..
    Please tell me the actual Tab Setting and Acc Sequence.. My system is not moving further
    Thanks

    Hi
    The access sequence for PR00 is PR00 or PR02
    the condition tables in PR00 is as folows :
    Customer / Material
    Price list / Currency / Material
    Material
    For PR02 access sequence, Try to copy the condition table 304,305and 306 condition tables  this will solve the problem
    Reward if useful
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Why self-defined access sequences of free goods can not work?

    Hi gurus,
    I have maintained access sequences of free goods self-defined.but when i creat the SO it does not work!
    when i used the standard access sequences ,it is OK .
    Can anybody tell me why?
    thanks in advance

    Dear Sandy,
    Go to V/N1 transaction select your self defined access sequence then go in to the accesses and fields and check all fields are activated.
    Make sure that these fields are flowing in your sales order.
    I hope this will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

Maybe you are looking for