Account 1103535 is currently blocked by user ALE_RFC_COMM

We are receiving this error occasionally when processing CREMAS IDocs. We are receiving the IDoc from PI and processing through ALE. Occurring at the same time we have DEBMAS IDocs coming into the system through Crossworlds being processed by a user defined function module. I am wondering if we are having contention between the two processes? In some cases the vendor number is the same as the customer number but not always.  Can someone please provide some insight?
Thanks
Jim

Hi James,
Schedule another background for program RBDMANI2 by giving the message type as input for that program.  This program will process the idoc's which have failed during the initial execution.  The error likes currently blocked by user is only at that particular point of time, when your background job executes those sort of error idoc's will be processed and you will not have those things in the error list.
Usually you get those sort of errors when the jobs are running concurrently and trying to use the same tables.  You can your program as well as it is a custom program, you might have forgot to clear any varibales in that, even if you don't clear the variables properly in the program then also it leads to these sort of errors.
Thanks,
Mahesh.

Similar Messages

  • Idoc error (Account vendor no. is currently blocked by user user name )

    Hello ,
    I am sending a cremas idoc from external system (XI) to R3
    But the idoc doesnt get posted.
    It throws the following error 51
    Account <vendor no.> is currently blocked by user <user name(login id for R3)>
    I tried resending this idoc using tcode we19 and was successful in testing it
    However, when i try sending it through XI, it gives me the error
    Does any one know how this can be solved?
    Regards,
    Roshani

    Hi,
    Please make sure that no more screens are open while trying to send the idoc and try again after you get succes from WE19 , It should be posted.
    Also check the thread it says in sm12 if there is any lock entry delete it.
    Error :Account 1000 is currently blocked by user SAPUSER
    Thanks!
    Edited by: sudhir tiwari on Nov 21, 2008 1:07 PM

  • Login to Jabber Client (Windows/Mac) with current logged in user account.

    We are deploying Jabber Client for Windows and will eventually be deploying for Macintosh.  I have no problem building the thinapp deployment package for the Jabber client.  However, when the thinapp is ran, it always shows the account that was used to initially login to the client and setup the server connection.
    Is there a way for the client to use the current logged in user in the sign in field?  I am trying to automate or SSO the process of logging into Jabber.
    Any and all ideas, tips, and/or tricks are greatly appreciated!
    Thank you,
    Wes

    This is nothing to do with the TC. This is your user issues on the Mac.
    I would do a major fix on the computer.. copy your user files to another location.. create a new administrator account.. login with the new admin account and delete the old one. Delete all the files associated with that account, so you are effectively starting with a clean Mac.
    I have just sold off a couple of computers and that is how I prepared it for the next person.. it seemed to work easily and removed all my stuff from the computer whilst still giving them full admin access.
    Please I am far from expert in doing this kind of stuff in OSX so just look up deleting original user accounts in whatever OS you run.

  • I have a stalker using an icloud account.  I've been to the police about it twice. How do I get icloud to block this user?

    I have a stalker using an icloud account.  I've been to the police about it twice.  How do I get icloud to block this user?

    Are you saying they are stalking you buy sending you iMessages? Not sure what their using an iCloud account has to do with it. Can you elaborate?
    iMessage blocking will become available in iOS 7

  • Block BO user after 3 unsuccessful logon attempts

    Hi Guys,
    I want to block BO user after after 3 unsuccessful logon attempts logging through infoview. Is there anyway to configure this option? Currently the account is not blocked after any number of unsuccessful logon attempts.
    Product Version : 11.5.12.1838 (BOXI R2)
    Regards,
    Sasi

    It is only available to Enterprise users because BO doesn't have the authority to lock domain accounts out.
    Go into the CMC and choose authentication
    In the Enterprise tab, within the Logon Restrictions section, tick the box next to "Disable account after N failed attempts to log on:" and then click on Update at the bottom of the screen.
    Regards,
    Mark

  • How To Block a User From Changing Total Field In AR Invoice

    Hi all,
    I would like to find out how to block a user from being able to change the total field at the bottom right hand side of the AR Invoice.  Currently if a user creates an invoice and is still busy in that invoice they can adjust the total field which in turn will update the discount field as well.
    Is this simply an authorization issue or am I going to have to do it in the transaction notification?
    We are using SAP Business One PL 30 currently.

    Hi
    Please review by note again -This is by system design .
    I don't know why you are so worried abt this because by setting up discount max ,if user cannot post the document ,that means it is not in the system ,no matter they change multiple times in the fields .
    But I think your scenario is different ,
    You are copying with certain discount from Delivery to AR invoice and i think you don't want user to change the discount field , then you can solve your issue by using approval or sp_notification
    If you really want it to be greyed out ,I think you might have to go through by SDK or Boyum addon.
    Thank you
    Bishal

  • I created one iTunes account on one pc and another iTunes account on my current pc. How do I merge the two accounts?

    I created one iTunes account on one pc and another iTunes account on my current pc. How do I merge the two accounts?

    Csound1 wrote:
    iMatch works by matching or uploading the music in your iTunes account, it doesn't matter where the music came from as long as it now in your account, but if you purchased it with a different account you will need to be logged in
    No.
    As long as you computer is authorized for that iTunes account, the songs will work with iTunes Match. The user does not need to be logged in on that computer.
    Husband's computer and husband's iTunes account signed in.
    Songs from wife's iTunes account on computer and computer authorized for wife's account. Songs from both will work with iTunes Match.

  • My Tasks View in my custom task list fails to display the tasks assigned to me (that is the currently logged in user)

    Hi
    I am new to sharepoint 2010.
    I created a custom task list, where I  have many tasks assigned to users (I had tasks assigned to me as well). I created a view as "My tasks "and having a filter as Assigned To is equal to [Me]. When I do that my view fails to show the
    tasks assigned to me. This happens same with the Sharepoints 'My Tasks' view as well. I tested by creating some test tasks under my name and when I selected 'My Tasks' view no tasks are getting displayed.
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Gokulkumar.

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to display the tasks assigned the current logged in user.
    In my environment, if I used the System Account, My Task view didn’t display any tasks.
    However , if I used other users except the System Account, My Task view could display current user tasks correctly.
    I recommend to use other accounts except System Account to log in site. Then everything will work well.
    Thank you for your understanding.
    Best Regards,
    Linda Li
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Hi apple, I have currently got a visa $50 gift card. I put it on my iTunes account I have currently ran out of funds on the card. Now even when I try to download free apps or even update, it says it requires a new credit card. Is there a way around this?

    Hi apple, I have currently got a visa $50 gift card. I put it on my iTunes account I have currently ran out of funds on the card. Now even when I try to download free apps or even update, it says it requires a new credit card. Is there a way around this

    We are fellow users here on these user-to-user forums, you're not talking to iTunes Support nor Apple.
    If you have a credit card on your account then it needs to be valid. Have you tried removing it from yoru account ? On your iPad try tapping on your id in Settings > Store (Settings > iTunes & App Store on iOS 6+) and selecting 'View Apple ID' on the popup - that should give you a payments link on your account's page.

  • LDAP Configuraton: Is it possible to block 2500 users??

    Hello experts,
    we are running an EP with about 2500 users. The database for all users is the Protal´s DB sofar.
    However we would like to use the company´s AD for retreiving user data.
    Now, the users in the portal database have more o less the same LogonID as they have in the AD.
    In the LDAP Configuraton one can block special users like Administrator or Guest. These users are always retrieved from the Portal´s DB and never from the AD. Makes sense.
    However in our case, would it be possible to block all 2500 users who are already in the Portals DB and all new users who get integrated to the portal come from the AD?
    I can imagine this is an big issue for the UME. To go through all 2500 LogonIDs every time a user wants to log in.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thomas

    Hello Virender Sharma,
    the point is, we are already running a productive system with more than 2500 users stored in portal´s database.
    We didn´t connect so far to LDAP.
    We didn´t connect to LDAP during portal installation years ago.
    Now, we know that it has been a huge error that we didn´t connect to LDAP at the very beginning.
    The used UserIDs in portal´s database are identical with the ones used in LDAP.
    Now we would like to switch to LDAP as datasource. However we do not want to delete all users in portal´s database because of inconsistency with the current portal system.
    The idea is to block all user data from all 2500 portal users from being retrieved from LDAP.
    Only data from new users should be retrieved from LDAP.
    I hope now the issue is clear.
    Can a productive system work well with the configuration of 2500 users being blocked in the UME?
    Thanks in advance.
    Thomas

  • Gc current block 2-way  +  gc remaster waits

    Hi,
    my db version is 10.2.0.5
    i have these waits high in 5 minutes period in 2 node rac cluster.
    what may be the reason.
    Is there a workaround.
    Thanks,

    Here is the AWR report :
    WORKLOAD REPOSITORY report for
    DB Name         DB Id    Instance     Inst Num Release     RAC Host       
    XXXXXXX       985096646 YYYYYY             1 10.2.0.5.0  YES ZZZZZZ  
                  Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
    Begin Snap:     60910 02-Aug-11 10:00:15       511      12.5
      End Snap:     60912 02-Aug-11 11:00:11       496       9.3
       Elapsed:               59.93 (mins)
       DB Time:              658.65 (mins)
    Cache Sizes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~                       Begin        End
                   Buffer Cache:    75,136M    75,136M  Std Block Size:         8K
               Shared Pool Size:     6,720M     6,720M      Log Buffer:    14,176K
    Load Profile
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~                            Per Second       Per Transaction
                      Redo size:            199,638.95              4,481.69
                  Logical reads:            111,069.18              2,493.39
                  Block changes:              1,139.51                 25.58
                 Physical reads:              4,477.47                100.51
                Physical writes:                200.85                  4.51
                     User calls:              1,681.64                 37.75
                         Parses:                295.75                  6.64
                    Hard parses:                 18.27                  0.41
                          Sorts:                229.12                  5.14
                         Logons:                  3.70                  0.08
                       Executes:                723.08                 16.23
                   Transactions:                 44.55
      % Blocks changed per Read:    1.03    Recursive Call %:    58.29
    Rollback per transaction %:    0.12       Rows per Sort:   662.19
    Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                Buffer Nowait %:   99.99       Redo NoWait %:  100.00
                Buffer  Hit   %:   98.72    In-memory Sort %:  100.00
                Library Hit   %:   94.36        Soft Parse %:   93.82
             Execute to Parse %:   59.10         Latch Hit %:   99.80
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:   24.11     % Non-Parse CPU:   91.61
    Shared Pool Statistics        Begin    End
                 Memory Usage %:   57.92   57.86
        % SQL with executions>1:   74.08   77.89
      % Memory for SQL w/exec>1:   68.45   68.87
    Top 5 Timed Events                                         Avg %Total
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                                        wait   Call
    Event                                 Waits    Time (s)   (ms)   Time Wait Class
    db file sequential read           2,180,370       8,450      4   21.4   User I/O
    CPU time                                          5,562          14.1          
    gc current block 2-way            1,368,857       4,049      3   10.2    Cluster
    gc remaster                           1,606       2,776   1728    7.0    Cluster
    gc cr block 2-way                   312,527       1,615      5    4.1    Cluster
              -------------------------------------------------------------      

  • GPUpdate /force in Task Sequence as current logged on user

    Hi,
    I am currently trying to "upgrade" around 800 installations of Microsoft Office Standard 2010 to Microsoft Office 2010 Professional Plus. To do this, I'll have to:
    1: Install Office 2010 ProPlus
    2: Uninstall Office 2010 Standard
    3: Repair Office 2010 ProPlus
    Due to these steps, I've decided to make a task sequence to do the magic.
    So far, so good, the "upgrade" is installing, and the MAP toolkit reports are showing the correct results from my test lab.
    During the repair of Office 2010 ProPlus, the Office applications cannot
    run, so I've created a task to copy a custom group policy to %systemroot%\System32\GroupPolicy to deny the affected users to start the applications.
    After applying the group policies, I manually run a gpupdate /force on my test computer. The applications are not starting. Also - so far so good.
    Ok, so here is my challenge:
    Since the Task Sequence is running in context of the SYSTEM account, the applied group policy will not refresh the GPO's of the current logged on user. Meaning; during the installation / repair of Office 2010, the user can open all the applications regardless
    of the applied GPO's, and I'd very much like to avoid that. The TS will fail otherwise. Yes, I know I can perform a restart to apply the policies, but I'd like to avoid that as well.
    Any idea how can I solve this?

    I think you're making it very complex for yourself. I think that the PowerShell App Deployment Toolkit would be very benificial for a situation like this. For more information have a look here:
    https://psappdeploytoolkit.codeplex.com/
    My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
    Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

  • Get username and password of the currently logged-in user in CRM and pass it to the plugin

    Hi,
    I am integrating CRM Online and SharePoint Online. Right now I am using Office365 trial version for both. Hence, the same username and password works for both.
    I want to create sub-site in SharePoint on create of an entity record. Currently, I am passing the admin credentials. But, I want to pass the credentials of the currently logged-in user in CRM to the plugin which is getting executed on create of account entity.
    So that I can then create sub-site in SharePoint using the current user credentials instead of admin credentials.
    Is there way to achieve this?

    Hello,
    You would not be able to get login/password of currently logged in user. I believe usage of admin credentials is the best way to achieve your goal.
    Dynamics CRM MVP
    My blog

  • Find who is blocking an user with wrong password...

    Hi,
    I have someone (probably an application) that is constantly blocking an user account by trying to login with a wrong password.
    How can I found out who is doing this (IP and OS username)?
    I thought that putting the listener in trace mode would give me this information, but it didn't work.
    I would appreciate if anyone could help me,
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Write a After SERVERERROR trigger on the database with error code 1017 to find the details
    Note: Since it is a system level trigger you must be very careful while writing these types of trigger.
    Regards

  • How to block certain users to print S1 billing document type documents

    Hello,
    I need to block some user so that they can not print the S1 reversed billing documents. How can I do this?
    Thank you.
    H

    Hi ,
    You can very well control this with the basis help.Pls inform to basis the role of a user which you want to restrict the access to transaction code.We can control this through the authorisation object concept with activities create/change/display/release etc.
    Please don't use any exits for this,this is possible in standard SAP.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Pasapula.

Maybe you are looking for