Account assignment template (FB60) Line item Value date

Hi Gurus,
I have an issue regarding the value date on line item level on Account assignment template on FB60. When user activates an Account Assignment template, on each line item system populates the value date equal to the date of the template creation date and not the current date. I created the template with several GL accounts and before saving it I deleted the value date from the line items. Now I want to reuse the same template after a week, it shows the correct GL accounts but with the value date equl to the template creation date (last week date). Any suggestion please, how can I fix this.
Regards,
Ahmad

In the IMG "Enter Global parameters" for your Company code change the status of the switch "Define Default value date" and then test.
Thanks
Ron

Similar Messages

GR can not printed for PO-Multiple account assignment on single line item ,

Hi!
I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
Can you please let me have the solution ?
Thank snd regards,
Suranjana

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

Sales order no and line item no in account assignment tab of line item no.

Hi All,
When we display a sales order and go to line item --> Account assignment tab --> we can see sales order no and line item no in that screen. We want to know from where this existing no. in that field is populating from.
We want to know this as we want to check feasibility of changing sales order and item no to maintenance contract no and line item no. ( Maintenance contract we have to pick from notification)
If anybody has any idea about this do let me know as this is urgent requirment.
Effort will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Satish Bharambe on Jul 4, 2008 10:38 AM

Hi Satish,
You mean Accounting assignment tab-->In Settlement rule details
If yes the order number which is coming in that field Sales order and for which sale order you are looking that details both are the same numbers(i.e Nothing but sales order number).
When you create sales order system will give number of the sales order the number will come in this place.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Urgent : FB60 line item value splitting

All,
My client needs to split the value of line item by the specified percentage.
When clicking simulate/Post button
1. The amount of the line item is split by the specified percentage.
2. The tax amount is split by the specified percentage.
Does anyone know which user-exit or method i could use to meet this expectation?
Thanks a lot!
suresh

Hi,
How r u and this is anil. i doesnt understand the question.
will u please clearly mention what do u want so that i can help u
u rs friend
anilkumar

XML shows multiple po distributions account for each po line item

Hi, We have custome RDF created for Purchase Order Detail Report. Per the PO summary report, PO nubmer 30367 has two lines and each on has single distributions. Each line has different distributions. Line 1distribution account: 01.000.105.65020.00000.00 and Line 2 distribution account: 01.000.000.15020.00000.00. However when I run the XML for PO summary report, each line items contains the two account distributions. How do you make it sho it only show the account distribution pertain to the each line?
**Please see xml below.**
- <LIST_G_COMPANY>
- <G_COMPANY>
<C_COMPANY>CTI US Ledger</C_COMPANY>
<C_ORGANIZATION_ID>83</C_ORGANIZATION_ID>
<GL_CURRENCY>USD</GL_CURRENCY>
<STRUCTURE_ACC>101</STRUCTURE_ACC>
<STRUCTURE_CAT>101</STRUCTURE_CAT>
<C_YES>Yes</C_YES>
<C_NO>No</C_NO>
<C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>1</C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>
<BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>0</BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>
- <LIST_G_HEADERS>
- <G_HEADERS>
<POH_REMARKS />
<CREATION_DATE>01-SEP-10</CREATION_DATE>
<STATUS>Approved</STATUS>
<REV>0</REV>
<PRINTED_DATE />
<TYPE>Standard Purchase Order</TYPE>
<BUYER>BUNTING, DOUGLAS</BUYER>
<C_CURRENCY>USD</C_CURRENCY>
<VENDOR>Softchoice Corporation</VENDOR>
<ACCEPTANCE_DATE />
<ON_HOLD />
<VENDOR_SITE>SOFTCHOICE - PO</VENDOR_SITE>
<ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>No</ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR>
<PO_HEADER_ID1>2790</PO_HEADER_ID1>
<REVISED_DATE />
<PO_NUMBER>30367</PO_NUMBER>
<C_FND_PRECISION>2</C_FND_PRECISION>
- <LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>1</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>Test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>500</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>2</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>1000</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
</LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>2,500.00</C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>
</G_HEADERS>
</LIST_G_HEADERS>
</G_COMPANY>
</LIST_G_COMPANY>
<XCOMPANY_NAME>CTI US Ledger</XCOMPANY_NAME>
<YES>Yes</YES>
<NO>No</NO>
<ORG_ID>83</ORG_ID>
<CAT_ID>1</CAT_ID>
<COUNT_RECORDS>1</COUNT_RECORDS>
</XXCTI_POXPOSTD_1>
**Here is the Query for the RDF file...**
SELECT pol.line_num Line
, pol.closed_flag Line_Closed
, pol.cancel_flag Line_Cancel
, pol.closed_code
, plt.line_type Line_Type
, &P_FLEX_CAT C_FLEX_CAT
, &P_FLEX_ITEM C_FLEX_ITEM
, pol.item_revision Rev
, pol.item_description Item_Description
, pol.unit_meas_lookup_code Unit
, pol.note_to_vendor Note_to_Vendor
/* Bug: 141118 Take unit price from PO_LINES if there is no shipment */
, to_number(decode(plt.order_type_lookup_code,
'AMOUNT',null,
nvl(pll.price_override,pol.unit_price))) Unit_Price
, hrl.location_code Ship_To_Location
, pll.promised_date Promised_Date
, pll.need_by_date Need_By_Date
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Ordered
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Received
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Cancelled
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)),
:p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Due
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Billed
, pol.po_header_id
FROM po_line_locations pll
, mtl_system_items msi
, mtl_categories mca
, po_lines pol
, po_line_types plt
, hr_locations hrl
WHERE
ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) > 0
AND (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount), NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)),:p_qty_precision)) > (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision))
AND pol.item_id = msi.inventory_item_id(+)
AND nvl(msi.organization_id,:c_organization_id) = :c_organization_id
AND pol.line_type_id = plt.line_type_id
AND pol.category_id = mca.category_id
/* Bug No 141118
Added the outer join on po_line_id ,hrl.location_id and nvl on the shipment_type
Also added nvl on quantity and price so as to select quantity and price if the PO
has no shipments */
AND pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id(+)
AND pll.ship_to_location_id = hrl.location_id(+)
AND pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD', 'PLANNED')
AND &P_WHERE_CAT
AND &P_WHERE_ITEM
ORDER BY pol.line_num

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

How to get Characteristic Values assigned to the line item of Sales Order?

Hi,
I want to get the Characteristic Values( Variant Configuration )assigned to First Line Item of Sales Order.
I was using the Fn. Mod.: VC_I_GET_CONFIGURATION_IBASE,
this fn. mod. giving all the Characters but not the assigned characteristic values.
Is there any other way to find characteristic values of sales order.
Thanks,
vinayak.
Message was edited by: vinayaga sundaram

For example, please see this example program.
It lists the characteristic names, the values, and the description of the values which are tied to a sales document.
report zrich_0001.
* Internal Table for Characteristic Data
data: begin of i_char occurs 0.
        include structure comw.
data: end of i_char.
data: xcabn type cabn.
data: begin of xcawn,
      atwtb type cawnt-atwtb,
      end of xcawn.
data: xvbap type vbap.
parameters: p_vbeln type vbap-vbeln,
            p_posnr type vbap-posnr.
start-of-selection.
select single * from vbap into xvbap
             where vbeln = p_vbeln
               and posnr = p_posnr.
clear i_char. refresh i_char.
* Retrieve Characteristics.
call function 'CUD0_GET_VAL_FROM_INSTANCE'
       exporting
            instance           = xvbap-cuobj
       tables
            attributes         = i_char
       exceptions
            instance_not_found = 1.
loop at i_char.
    clear xcabn.
    select single * from cabn into xcabn
             where atinn = i_char-atinn.
    clear xcawn.
    select single cawnt~atwtb into xcawn
               from cawn
                 inner join cawnt
                   on cawn~atinn = cawnt~atinn
                  and cawn~atzhl = cawnt~atzhl
                      where cawn~atinn = i_char-atinn
                        and cawn~atwrt = i_char-atwrt.
    write:/ xcabn-atnam, i_char-atwrt, xcawn-atwtb.
endloop.
Regards,
RIch Heilman

Multiple account assihnment in sigle line item

hi all,
please let me know the proceedure how to activate the multiple account assginment for sigleline item.-account assignment cat: K
i tried with OME9(MAINTAIN ACCOUNT ASSIGNEMNET CATEGORY)
ID: AcctAssgt - status to 2, but the thing is when i do the PO, GR-non valuation tick becomes active. even though i de-activated GR-NON valuation indicator in the same screen.
the error message is 06 438
Valuated GR not allowed in case of multiple account assignment.

There are two preconditions that must be fulfilled -
1) Go to transaction OME9 and flag on the 'IR changeability' indicator of the account assignment category 'K' (since this is for services).
2) When maintaining your PO, make sure that the GR-non-valuated indicator is flagged.
When GR is posted, no accounting document will be generated. This accounting document will be created during IR posting where A/P can manually modify the accounting data as their wish.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.
From the accounting point of view, for one particular single line item, it is possible to split into different cost centers or internal orders. For instance, I have ordered 10 pcs of bearings of which 4 will be charged to Cost Center A and the remaining 6 pcs will be posted to cost center B. However, it is of SAP standard feature that once using the multiple-account assignment, no accounting document will be generated after GR posting. They will only be posted when IR is maintained.
Thanks

Which all tables suffice all line item GL data requirements

Please clarify this requirement for Line Item Data from New GL. my client BMW Inc have configured New GL in ECC 6.0 if i pull all the records to BW from FAGLFLEXA (Line Item Table) is that sufficient to meet the <b>all line item GL data</b> or is there any other tables missing that also shall be combined to bring the Line item GL data. Please help me for this if u can check with any of your friends in FICO.
2. I have seen that BSEG AND BKPF are used earlier in old FI versions so what is there now in New GL ECC 6.0 that will suffice for these BSEG AND BKPF or still i have to pull records by using these tables. for GL Line Item Data.
If you can help me to give the short overview of New GL posting process it would be great.
Thanks
Regards
Soniya Kapoor

Hi Soniya,
FAGLFLEXA & FAGLFLEXT would contain all FI line item
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/a8/e26840b151181ce10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Pls assign points as way to say thanks

Ability to modify Account Assignment Category for Service Item Categories

Dear experts,
Our customer has a requirement to modify the account assignment category when the item category is set to "D" services on a PR and PO line item. This scenario is specific to indirect procurement scenarios in SAP ECC 6.0 MM.
End users may potentially create a PR against a service item category with an incorrect account assignment category. These PRs are created using free form text. No service master exists in these scenarios. During the approval process or during PO creation, an approver or the buyer may need to correct the account assignment category. The account assignment category is "display" only and cannot be modified when the item category is set to "D". The user must delete the line item and create a new line item with the correct account assignment category. The copy function cannot be used because the account assignment copies from the existing line and cannot be modified.
Any recommendations to this issue using standard SAP configuration solutions?
Thanks,
Jennifer

Item Category to Account Assignment Category combination is already configured. For Service Item Category, we have three account assignment categories configured. All three categories are valid in different scenarios. Sometimes the user selects the incorrect account assignment category (out of the three available) depending on the business scenario. PT9F configuration is already set to Account Assignment category "optional". However, the account assignment category still cannot be modified on the PR when the item category is "D" service.
Any other recommendations?

Revenue Recognition based on User Status of assigned Sales Order line item

Dear Community members,
We have requirement to recognize / de-recognize revenue posted to WBS for calculation of RA, based on the 'User status' of the assigned Sales Order line item.
To elaborate requirement further -
1) WBS Element - XXX - 10 ( with operative indicator - Plan/Bill/Account Assign)
2) Sales Order(SO) Line Items assigned to the above WBS -
- SO No - 123 Line Item 10 - Actual Rev - $ 300 - User Status - EXE (Meaning this work is in progress , partial payment received thus actual revenue for RA at WBS is 'Zero'
- SO No - 124 Line Item 20 - Actual Rev - $ 400 - User Status - COMPL(Meaning this work is Complete , all payment received thus actual revenue for RA at WBS is $400
- SO No - 125 Line Item 10 - Actual Rev - $ 800 - User Status - EXE (Meaning this work is in progress , partial payment received thus actual revenue for RA at WBS is 'Zero'
As per WBS reports Actual Revenue posted to WBS XXX-10 is $ 1500 ( $300$400$800) , however since two SO line items ( SO 123 /line item 10 and SO 125 / line Item 10 ) are NOT having User status 'COMPLETE', the actual revenue posted by those line items $ 1100/- ($300 + 800) should not be included as Actual Revenue for RA at WBS level.
Thus Actual Revenue for RA at WBS XXX-10 should be $ 400 /- ( the revenue posted by SO 124/line item 20 which has user status as 'COMPLETE')
How do above can be achieved?? Is there any standard solution for this?? Is any SAP Note available for this (I too am looking for one but not found any ) ?? do we need any enhancement , Customer exit etc
Thanks in advance
with regards

Hi,
Thanks. You are right that the 'Completed Contract Method' would defer revenue recognition. However, the status checked would be of the RA object (WBS Element in this case, as RA key is on WBS and RA is being calculated on the WBS).
However, our requirement is to check the user status of the Sales Order Line items assigned to the WBS element and filter the revenues posted based on the active user status of individual Sales Order Line item.
Please give you inputs.
Thanks in advance
With regards

Profit Center assigned to a line item by default.

Hi,
When posting an entry to Bank account the user is not giving any profit center, but in entry view you can see the profit center being assigned to that line item and displayed. From where is that Profit center getting assigned and How can that be checked in the system?

Hi,
A default profit center can be maintained in transaction 3KEH (table T8A30).
Check if the a default profit center is maintained for the Bank GL code the table.
Regards,
Sameer

Change the status profile assigned to the line item from PROFA TO PROFB

Hi Experts,
The issue we are having relates more to the fact that the code we have written is changing the item category, however the status profile has already been retrieved from configuration based on the original item category and therefore the status selection that we are getting is incorrect.
Item Category A -> Status Profile PROFA
Item Category B -> Status Profile PROFB
For example we have a line item and item category A is determined through config, this then retrieves its associated status profile PROFA. However we have then coded the system to change item category A to item category B. However the status profile still remains PROFA.
We need to find a way to change the status profile assigned to the line item from PROFA to PROFB.
any quick inputs from any one please......
Thanks in advance
hemanth

Hi
There is perform which moves the values to VBAP field.
This PRCTR field is stored in VBAP (i.e., SO line item table)
USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP
Hope it works.
VVR

About Account assignment templates

Dear Experts,
When user use FV70 Tree on button ,they can see all users Account assignment templates list,how to control use only see themselves account assignment templates,current user can not see another users account assignment templates?
Looking forward to your reply.
Best Regards,
Merry

Hi,
Definition: Account Assignment Category: - A key indicating whether an item is to be assigned to an auxiliary account (such as a cost center).
The account assignment category determines which account assignment details are required for the item (for example, cost center or account number).
Generally used Account Assignment Categories are Cost Center (K) in case of Miscellaneous Purchases, Assets (A) in Capital Goods Purchases, etc...
You can configure Account Assignment Category in Transaction OME9 OR you can go with following path;
SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories
Her you have to perform following Activities;
1. Check the attributes of the account assignment categories
2. Maintain the account assignment categories to suit your requirements

FB50: Account Assignment Templates

Hello Gurus-
I have a problem. My users have saved templates when using FB50 with G/L, D/C, Cost Center. When the template is saved, the Functional Area is populated. The template is saved and all is well.
However, when the user accesses that template again and completed the date, and amount, he/she gets an error "An entry in field functional area is not permitted". This then requires the user to clear out the functional area and then save again where SAP enters the same functional areas again.
Where in SAP, setting or whatever can this be changed so the user can proceed without clearing out the functional area.
There is no way to save the template without the functional area unless we do not enter the Cost Center.
Thank you.

Hi AMS,
The likely reason why you cannot save the account assignment template without functional areas unless you do not enter a cost center has to do with the fact that, either functional areas have been maintained in the various cost centers in KS01/KS03 or the G/L account requires an account assignment object which does have functional maintained in them.
The only way to avoid this is to remove the functional areas from the cost centers in KS02 which I will never advise you to do due to data inconsistencies. I would rather urge you to explain to users the main use/reason of account assignment templates.
Regards,
Elias
Edited by: Elias Akorli on Aug 4, 2010 12:59 PM

Line Item Value change in MIRO Transaction

I have one requirement i.e as follows.
<b>Line Item Value change in MIRO Transaction</b>
After getting the items in table control of the miro screen of a particular order.
I have to clicked on edit own condition of selected item.
then it will show another screen ( create invoice document item - conditions)which have the all condtions details like
Fra1 , frb1 , sd% , Penalty % , gross price , frieght charges etc.
In this screen first time it is showing line item as
in the miro intial screen i.e. if u click po item
10 it will show 10 only.
after updating fra1 value , i came back to the main screen at that time it is asking that select the any one of three.
after selecting manual selection its fra1 was changed.
once again if i go to the same line item by clicking
the edit own condition(13 column if u select all information in textbox whixh is above tablecontrol right corner) it is showing line item as 1 in screen ( create invoice document item - conditions) which should be line item as 10. ( here i took line item as 10)
Please clarify this, why it is showing
first time as a original line item and
after updating it is showing like
for line item 10 -
1
               20 -
2
              100 -
10
              110 -
11.

"...it does not work..." is probably the worst description of a problem you can imagine. As an application developer you should know that. Do you use firebug to see what happens once it "does not work"? Any better hints?
Denes Kubicek
http://deneskubicek.blogspot.com/
http://www.apress.com/9781430235125
https://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=31517:1
http://www.amazon.de/Oracle-APEX-XE-Praxis/dp/3826655494
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Account assignment template (FB60) Line item Value date

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for