Account determination does not take place

Hi SD gurus ,
Have created the billing document but the account document has not been created for this ,what are the possible causes for this pls advice

Hi,
Possible causes as far as I know:
G/L assignment not fulfilled: please check VKOA. Then check all items in the billing document to see whether an item missing a key, for example account key for a specific condition type. Any missing key at item level will cause entire document unable to post.
If related to costing accounting, assign cost object is mandatory.
If there be posting block, release it.
When you release it to accounting, you can see the error message.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Copying Order No of Sales Order to Delivery Document does not take place

Hi. Experts
I have punched Sales order with Order number in the field of 'Order Number' on 'Accounting' Tab but when I copy the same sales order to the Delievery Document. the 'Order Number' does not appear on 'Order Number' Field on 'Accounting' tab of Delievery Document.
Please help me out.
Regards
Rakhi

Hi Rakhi,
Actually there is no relationship between the field on sales order & the field on delivery, for both the document it is separate field.
This field is used for mentioning the order for the chain system.
for e.g. 'A' has given order to 'B' and 'B' has given order to 'C' in this process 'A' to 'B' is the first order & 'B' to 'C' is the second order.
You can use UDF to pull the order no. in delivery.
Regards,
Datta Kharat

I am trying to sync computers. After I set up first and go to second when I select I already have an account it does not take me to the screen to enter email and password as directions say. I am stuck!

Computer 1 setup with code.
When I follow instructions on computer 2 and select I already have account it give me set of codes to enter on first computer at :add device screen. Does not give me option option to add email address and password but tells me to enter a code they supple to add a device screen on first computer. When i go there it doesn't give me this option

Hi!
I understand that Computer 1 is synced and you see something like this when you access the Sync Tab under Preferences: https://support.mozilla.com/media/uploads/gallery/images/2011-01-27-15-46-25-9c0352.png
And in Computer 2 you get a window similar to this: https://support.mozilla.com/media/uploads/gallery/images/compcode.jpg
But when you click on Add Device the following window doesn't appear: https://support.mozilla.com/media/uploads/gallery/images/2011-01-27-15-46-48-5f59d1.png
Is this correct? If so, please let me know what you see (a screenshot will be handy).
You can also set up the second computer following this instructions: https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/How%20to%20sync%20Firefox%20settings%20between%20computers#w_what-if-im-not-near-my-first-computer

Cannot create sales order as profit center assignment does not take place

Hi,
I am trying to create a sales order but am unable to create it as the profit center value is not picked up the value from material master.And hence, the incompletion log prevents me from creating the sales order. I seem to have done everything correct so far but somehow the profit center field (Account Assignment Tab at item level) remains empty. Instead, i can find the profit center value in "Assignment to Profitability segment".
What should i do so that my sales order picks up the profit center information ?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
check this link it may helpful,and do search in the forum you may find an existing solution for you problem.
RFBIBL00 - issue in Batch Input Session created
Thanks
Ram

Addition does not take place

Hi!
Has anybody an idea what is wrong here.
Variable gv_out provides the current time but not the result after
addition.
Regards
Ertas
data gv_input type t.
data gv_out type sy-timlo.
parameters p_min type i.
CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_SDURA_OUTPUT'
EXPORTING
 INPUT = p_min
IMPORTING
 OUTPUT = gv_input .
CALL FUNCTION 'EWU_ADD_TIME'
EXPORTING
 I_STARTTIME = sy-timlo
 I_STARTDATE = sy-datlo
 I_ADDTIME = gv_input
IMPORTING
 E_ENDTIME = gv_out .
write:/ gv_out .

Look at the FM u are using
FUNCTION CONVERSION_EXIT_SDURA_OUTPUT.
""Lokale Schnittstelle:
*" IMPORTING
*" VALUE(INPUT)
*" EXPORTING
*" VALUE(OUTPUT)
HOURS = INPUT DIV 60.
MINUTES_N = INPUT MOD 60.
WRITE HOURS TO OUTPUT(3) NO-SIGN.
OUTPUT+3(1) = ':'.
WRITE MINUTES_N TO OUTPUT+4(2).
ENDFUNCTION.
U debug it..
the variable OUTPUT has some prob..
when u write HOURS to OUTPUT(3).. then two spaces are coming in first two chars...
thats why gv_input variable is not in correct format...
U shud use differnt FM... or write ur own routine to do this operation...
2nd FM is working fine if u pass the correct value of gv_input to it...
Reward points if helpful
Regards
Prax

Time capsule recognised over WiFi but back-up does not take place

Good day all from Paris,
MacBook OS X 10.5.3, Airport Utility with TC 7.3.1 and the lot on internal private network totally operational using an Orange LiveBox as DSL modem, router operating on WiFi.
My TC originally backed-up my system, on an Ethernet set up, successfully.
I have since tried (for past few days and dismally repeatedly failed more than a dozen times) to get it to effect back-ups based on new settings applicable to TC "joining" my home WiFi network.
TC light is fixed green, AiPort Utility recognizes TC and all described parameters seem ok for latter Wireless connection.
TM when initiated shows the TC disk, starts the Back-Up preparation but latter running blue/white running bar carries on running for hours without any backing taking place. I left it on twice overnight and nothing more happened.
I obviously did hard resets & reconfig of TC a few times to no avail versus above problem.?????
Anyone, please, can help?

Hello Glasgow,
In fact I fiddled with darn "paper weight" for a few days trying all possible Wireless configs and did quite a few soft & hart reboots of the TC box but, to no avail.
Best I obtained was a clean recognition of MacBook & TM/TC wirelessly with green light fixed on TC.
However when I started back-ups the TM indicator went on for hours (overnight in one attempt) with its silly blue & white progress bar showing "Preparing" but never going any further. Thus failure total & absolute.
On Discussion forum I however notice a controversial subject pertaining to deleting, via Disc Utility software of the Mac, the so called "sparsebundle" files when latter appearing in Finder & located within the TC disc.
I took the risk, as a last option, before using the TC as a useless paper weight, of getting Disc Utility erasing once & for all those "sparsebundles" files though, thus, leaving me with a zero back-up.
Once this done I launched back-up anew and miracle.. the bloody TC came immediatly into life and started backing-up. Conclusion: sparsebundles had to be, somehow, corrupted.
This solution, therefore, solved "my" problem but will it be applicable for you or others? Also the erasing of the sparsebundle files carries a risk for anyone who had, once upon a time, managed to do a successful back-up, be it via Ethernet or Wireless on the TC & that is that this/these back-up(s) will be gone forever..
Good luck!

I have Windows Vista and when i click uninstall windows asks for permission then the usual uninstall process does not take place please help Carl

I cant uninstall Firefox in the normal way please help, the operating system on my pc is Vista I can only get as far as allowing windows permission then nothing happens

For general advice see Troubleshooting issues with iTunes for Windows updates.
The steps in the second box are a guide to removing everything related to iTunes and then rebuilding it, which is often a good starting point unless the symptoms indicate a more specific approach. Review the other boxes and the list of support documents further down the page in case one of them applies.
Your library should be unaffected by these steps but there is backup and recovery advice elsewhere in the user tip.
The section Install missing components has advice on breaking down the iTunes installer into the individual .msi files which might prove useful if one component, such as Apple Application Support, won't install normally.
tt2

HS.EXP does not take into account the Value member and the source

Hello,
The formula is put in the "Entity Curr Adjs" part of the Sub Calculate.
The expression is the following and apply for one entity (Holding method) I filtered previously and the ICP Entity has proportionnal method with 50% rate:
HS.Exp "A#5420.I#[ICP None].C1#REC.C2#[None].C3#[None].C4#Recla_IAS_Aut_RetS_5=
A#5340.V#[Contribution].E#Logista_E_TBCO.I#UTE_O.C1#CLO.C2#TotC2.C3#TotC3.C4#TotC4"
The data I would like to retrieve is the one in Contribution Value as I put on the source part of the expression.
And yet, the data I get is the one of the Entity Currency and Proportion Value, which is different because the ICP has proportionnal method (50%) and the Contribution value is the result of Proportion - Elimination values.
To sum up: I obtain a data of 50 instead of 25.
I checked that the data I see in my form corresponds to the source parameters but it seems that it does not take into account the Value parameter.
Could it be that it is not possible to use a Contribution Value source for an Entity Currency Adjs destination?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Julien

Hi,
I see another problem in what you're trying to do. First, let me state what you're trying to establish: you are trying to get a value from one entity (say A) to another entity (say B), be it at [Proportion], [Elimination], [Contribution], ...
My question is: how can you know that during the consolidation process, by the time your code runs on B, A has already been processed and [Proportion], [Elimination] are not empty (or contain values from a previous consolidation run)?
The answer is "You don't". Theoretically, you have no control as per the order in which entities are calculated/consolidated during the process. Even more complex is the thing that if you have a multi-core machine, more than one entities may run in parallel, but still you cannot force A to run before B. I have done some tests and I've seen that in a one processor setting the order that entities enter in the process of consolidation matches the order you have placed them in the consolidation tree in metadata. Still this thing is not documented as far as I know and therefore you cannot rely on this.
Finally, I have also seen that in a simple case (B pulls from A), if you run consolidation twice, then you definitely get correct values. By the time you make a change in A, you have to run consolidation twice again to make sure that you get the correct data. I believe that you see that what I'm describing is good for experimenting but not for releasing to a client.
I tend to think of such a design, as a practice to avoid.
--Kostas

Build thumbnail image does not take AnalogBalance into account

When I build a thumbnail, it does not take AnalogBalance into account.
dng_image_preview thumbnail;
dng_render render (host, *negative);
// Build stage 2 image.
negative->BuildStage2Image (host, ttShort);
// Build stage 3 image.
negative->BuildStage3Image (host, ttShort);
render.SetFinalSpace (negative->IsMonochrome () ? dng_space_GrayGamma22::Get () : dng_space_sRGB ::Get ());
render.SetFinalPixelType (ttByte);
render.SetMaximumSize (256);
thumbnail.fImage.Reset (render.Render ());
thumbnail.fImage.Get()->Rotate( dng_orientation::Mirror90CCW() );
thumbnail.fInfo.fColorSpace = thumbnail.fImage->Planes () == 1 ? previewColorSpace_GrayGamma22 : previewColorSpace_sRGB;

The AnalogBalance is going to affect the mapping between temp/tint values and camera neutral values. If the white balance values are already stored as camera neutral values, I would not expect it to significantly change thumbnail rendering.
It sounds like you do not understand AnalogBalance correctly.

[svn] 4746: User-submitted patch for SDK-16147 - HaloBorder does not take border widths into account when drawing background with rounded corners .

Revision: 4746
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-01-29 15:36:59 -0800 (Thu, 29 Jan 2009)
Log Message:
User-submitted patch for SDK-16147 - HaloBorder does not take border widths into account when drawing background with rounded corners.
Bugs: SDK-16147 (bug), SDK-16963 (patch)
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16147
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16147
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16963
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/skins/halo/HaloBorder.as

G/L account 1212 does not exist in chart of accounts INT

Dear Seniors,
While i do stock upload in MB1C using movement type 561, it is giving an error that
G/L account 1212 does not exist in chart of accounts INT
Message no. M7054
Diagnosis
The G/L account entered is not included in the chart of accounts for your company code.
Procedure
If the system has determined the G/L account, the system setting is faulty. Contact your systems administrator.
If you have entered the G/L account yourself, correct the input. Copied from M8043
I have changed the G/L account in OBYC but still this error is coming. what would be the cause and how to solve it ???
Regards,
Jana

Hi ,
To create the account for chart of account INT use tcode FSP0 .
And if you are trying to replace the account with another account check two entries in OBYC
one is in GBB --- give correct combination of valuation modifier , valuation class , use general modifier BSA and your new account
another is in BSX --give correct combination of valuation modifier , valuation class .
If still you are getting error revert back .
Regards,
Anupam

G/L account 891000 does not exist in company code

Dear Gurus,
im facing a error while posting Goods(Subcontracting )
i used Tcode FS01 to create G/L account
since i dont know what are the important data to be entered in creating 891000 G/L account by using Tcode FS01
pls help me
Thanks
Error is.....
G/L account 891000 does not exist in company code
Message no. M7055
Diagnosis
The G/L account has not been created in the company code in which you are working.
Procedure
If the system has determined the G/L account, the system setting is faulty. Contact your systems administrator.
If you have entered the G/L account or the company code yourself, check the account number entered, as well as the company code in which you are working.
G/L acct. CoCode
wrong right Correct the G/L account.
right wrong Correct the company code.
right right The G/L account must be created
for the company code. 

Hi Kamal,
Created account using Tcode FS01
i entered all mandatory fields
then i tried to save it was asking to fill the field Field Status Group in the tab Create/Bank/Interest then i gave G045>>>which is for Goods/invoice received clearing accounts
now the error is solver and im able to post goods...what i've doubt is... im not sure whether i gave correct Field Status Group
pls clarify me........
Thanks

Account determination is not happening with Cancel. Invoice (S1)

Hi friends,
Please can any one solve this error,
When i create a original invoice using billing doc type(F2) account determination happens and system automatically creates accounting document as well. If i cancle the orignal invoice using billing doc type(S1) account determination is not happening instead i will get a error message saying that the accounting document has not yet been created.
Swamy HP

Hi swatha,
This is what the error i am getting when i release the cancle invoice S1 billing doc to accounting.
For object RF_BELEG 0920, number range interval does not exist
Message no. NR 751
Diagnosis
The database table NRIV has the delivery class 'C', i.e. the SAP default settings are only in client 000.
Procedure
Create the missing number range interval in customizing.
Transaction code: FBN1
Swamy HP

Error: Assignment to feature PINCH did not take place

Hello
I am trying to do initial data entry using PB10, but the system is throwing an error as "Entry B02 does not exist in T526" (B02 is my personal Administrator) which I have maintained in T526 and when I try to continue removing the Pers Officer, the system is throwing an error as "Assignment to feature PINCH did not take place". The PINCH feature is also maintained for the applicant class
I have attached the screen shots here. Can some one help me out with the solution? Thanks in advance
Regards
Hemanth

HI Hemanth,
Can you paste the screenshot of pinch feature its not attached in the previous message. Return value of the PINCH feature must be APPPL for applicant as shown below,
Regards,
Mithun K

Virtual chars does not take part in update rules

Hi
Friends my question is Virtual Chars Does not take part in update rules than why to include it in data target??? directly we can include it at query designer .
Thanks
Asim

Hi,
Adding a charachteristics is to have a place holder in your data target. In virtual char you make use of this field memory pointer to populate the data for this field.
Hope this helps for you.
Thanks,
Arun

Account determination does not take place

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for