Accounting total value of item conditions
Dear Experts,
I have a scenario where rebates(volume discounts) are accrued at an item level through an item condition and are hence released to accounts also at an item level. As a result of this there are too many accrual entries getting posted for one single billing document depending on the number of line items of it having the accrual.
I want to have the accrual to continue at item level only, but, while posting to accounts, system should be able to pass one single entry (Consolidated entry) for the total accrual value of all line items taken together so that one billing document will have only one accrual entry line in accounting.
Is there any setting that can be done in condition types, billing document types or anywhere else? Any pointer towards a User-exit or Enhancement point?
Thanks in Advance,
Sujith
Hi Sujith,
Try transaction OBCY to summarize the transactions in accounting line item. Note # 36353. This customizing will try to summarize for all the accounting transactions irrespective of rebate or not so you should carefully choose your fields. As a last resort, you can fill some Z fields in accounting line item like billing document line number and condition type combination for all the line items except for rebate line item. Since all the line items have different value in this field except for rebate line items, system should summarize.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Naveen Aggarwal
Similar Messages
-
In Header condition P001showing more value than items conditions total P001
Dear Expert,
1. Business create one Purchase Order.
2. in the PO there four items.
3. here in item detail there is a condition type "P001 - Gross Price manual ". basic price of the material.
4. here the value of P001 in header is more than four items P001 total
what could be the reason ??? please guide me on this.
Thanks
H shahThanks a lot
-
SRM back end service PO not showing NAVS value in Item condition
Hi,
We are on classic scenario.When PO for services created in backend from SRM, in item details view under conditions,NAVS value seen as '0' but at service level it shows the correctly calculated value for NAVS.
When PO crrated in ECC dierctly for service it correctly shows up NAVS value both at item level under condition tab & also in service condition
Any suggestion
rgds,
arjmanrequirement closed
-
Header condition types and item condition type
Hello Gurus,
this is a simple question. does the header condition types are totally same as item condition types ?
thanks very much!hi,
header:
If this condition is marked as a header condition, it is possible to enter the condition type in the header condition screen. Checks for changing the condition manually are unaffected by this.
the header conditions calculate the header value
item : conditions of this type are allowed to be entered in the document items. The condition is then only valid for the particular item in which it is entered.
item condition calculate at item level
(freight condition)for eg = HD00 is a header condition .here if you have 10 materials and this cond type calculates the freight charges for all the 10 items.
KF00 is aitem condition.here system caliculates the freight charges only for that particular items.
Edited by: MANI ROOPA SD/MM on Apr 24, 2008 2:32 PM -
Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract
Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this. When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header = 700.00 EUR
Material Outgoing Target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header = 550.00 EUR
MAterial Outgoing target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AMNo, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution? -
Line item pricing based on total value of the order
Hi,
We need to charge as a separate line item (material) 'Insurance' as a % based on the total value of the order less one line item. Our orders are created on the web and posted via a BAPI.
(a) depending on where the customer is located, we charge a certain added shipping cost.
(b) the customer has the choice to ask for insurance or not.
The actual order may be 10 lines totaling $1,000 and due to location, the BAPI slaps on an added line item of $100. If the customer chose the insurance option, the BAPI needs to slap on another line item whose value would be, say 2% of the total order, i.e. 2% of 1000 (instead of on 1000+100). Of course, if the customer doesn't choose this option he is not charges this extra line and further if the customer is not in the particular region, the 100 charge may also not be there.
The 2% can vary time to time so needs to be driven by a condition record based on %.
How can we achieve this in the pricing procedure? The logic of how the BAPI will function is clear to us, we are stuck on the pricing procedure configuration.
Glad to answer any further questions you may need for clarifications.
Many thanks!Ideally insurance would be levied on end customer based on Inco Terms like CIF, DDU etc.,
So you can have an access sequence for which you can make use of tables like 033 & 034 in V/07. In VK11, for this combination, maintain the required insurance percent.
In condition type V/06, for this condition type, maintain "C" for Manual entries, since you have indicated that customer has the choice. Otherwise, this can be populated automatically in sale order.
Similarly, for shipment cost also, you can have the Inco2 as one of the combination so that based on region, this condition type will be populated in sale order. If you have shipment cost configured, then this can be achieved.
In your pricing procedure, you have to assign the shipment cost condition type next to insurance and assign the From-To step accordingly.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Condition value of Tax gets wrongly added to Total value of Contract
Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this. When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header = 700.00 EUR
Material Outgoing Target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header = 550.00 EUR
MAterial Outgoing target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.Got the solution by making the condition type as manual.
Thanks.
Dhruba -
Value of the condition should not added to NETWR filed of Item & Header
Hi Experts,
My clients has a specific requirement he wants header freight condition type should go to accounting but *it should not include in (NETWR field) net value field of header and line item of invoice (Table VBRK and VBRP)*
I have done the configuration of pricing procedure and allocated ERF as account key to freight condition type and placed the freight condition type after net value condition type and tax condition type
But unfortunately the value of freight condition type getting added to NETWR field kindly suggest how to handle this problem
Thanks
KrushnaDear Krushna,
in the internal field komp-netwr are all conditions included which are non statistical and active.
(taxes are excluded).
This is the standard behaviour.
But if you set a condition as statistical, this condition has no influence to the komp-netwr but it will be not transfer to FI. Because only all active condtions which are non statistical are transfer to FI.
Maybe you can create your own formula to exclude this condition from the komp-netwr.
I hope that the information are helpful.
regards
Claudia
Edited by: Claudia Neudeck on May 28, 2009 3:25 PM -
How do billing item conditions hit accounting?
Hello,
I am picking up the billing item condition values from KWERT and the corresponding GL Account SAKN1 from the KONV tabke. KWERT gets stored with the sign. I need to know how this condition amount will hit accounting. Would it be a debit or a credit entry on the accounting side. How can I do this? I cannot use the debit/credit indicator BSEG-SHKZG as we have a summarization on the material and we are trying to re-determine in a custom code what amounts should have posted to BSEG by material. While I am getting the amounts correctly from KONV, I am not able to figure out how these amounts should be treated on the accounting side - as a debit or a credit?
Example, on a regular invoice if the value is positive for a G/L account, on the accounting side the value is reverse in sign. However, this cannot be generalized as we can have many different types of invoices and different combinations.
Thanks,
PrayarnaHi ,
if u are unable to use BSEG for credit or debit , then what u can do is , ask ur Functional ppl abt the condition types , which one will have -ve values in the pricing procedure..
i think is the only way to do in this case , finding which condition type is -ve.
regards
PP. -
How do the billing item conditions hit accounting?
Hello,
I am picking up the billing item condition values from KWERT and the corresponding GL Account SAKN1 from the KONV tabke. KWERT gets stored with the sign. I need to know how this condition amount will hit accounting. Would it be a debit or a credit entry on the accounting side. How can I do this? I cannot use the debit/credit indicator BSEG-SHKZG as we have a summarization on the material and we are trying to re-determine in a custom code what amounts should have posted to BSEG by material. While I am getting the amounts correctly from KONV, I am not able to figure out how these amounts should be treated on the accoutning side - as a debit or a credit?
Example, on a regular invoice if the value is positive for a G/L account, on the accounting side the value is reverse in sign. However, this cannot be generalized as we can have many different types of invoices and different combinations.
Thanks,
PrayarnaHi ,
if u are unable to use BSEG for credit or debit , then what u can do is , ask ur Functional ppl abt the condition types , which one will have -ve values in the pricing procedure..
i think is the only way to do in this case , finding which condition type is -ve.
regards
PP. -
Exclusion item condition value for header condition
Dear All,
I explained my problem with example scenerio.
Sales Order Total Net Amount = 1.500 EUR
SO Item-10 = Advance Payment Sales = 500 EUR >> for first invoice
SO Item-20 = Sales from stock with HAWA material - 1 = 300 EUR >> for second invoice
SO Item-30 = Sales from stock with HAWA material - 2 = 1.200 EUR >> for second invoice
SO Header condition > ZAP1 = Advance payment decrease = - 500 EUR
System divided Advance Payment amount to all items.
Item-10 = - 125 EUR
Item-20 = - 75 EUR
Item-30 = -300 EUR
My request is on below;
Item-10 = 0 EUR
Item-20 = - 100 EUR
Item-30 = - 400 EUR
Is calculation possible with zero value for item-10 ?
Thanks for your helps.
Gulay CelikHi Gulay
System cant divide the advance payment to all items ,System can divide the advance payment for one item .
But assign a billing plan at header level and just check , if it works then your requirement can be fulfilled.But generally it is done at item level only
Make the following down payment configurations
item category group - 0005
item category - TAO
for this TAO item category a billing plan 01 (milestone billing plan -01) will be assigned and its billing relevance should be I which is order related billing .
billing doc type - FAZ
cancellation billing doc type - FAS
maintain a condition type AZWR which is down payment settlement , it has requirement as 2 and calc type as 48 acct key as ERL
Now when you enter a material in line item 10 and go to item data , you can see the billing plan tab.
now go to billing plan tab and enter the start date and enter the dates on which billing has to be done and then in billing request enter 0009 which is for down payment.once u press enter automatically it all the dates get blocked and billing request by default you get as 1 , that you change it to 4 or 5 . 4 is for down payment at value basis and 5 is for down payment at percentage basis. and beside that there will be a billing type .assign billing doc type as FAZ. to all dates
check the copying requirements are there at VTFA as 20 and for item category TAO copying requirements 23 is maintained or not
now do the cycle OR - LF - FAZ (billing doc type)
Regards
Srinath -
Can you calculate multiple text boxes to achieve a total value? If so how is that done? I am trying to create a order form where multiple items can be purchased but i would like the values of each item to calculate so I can achieve a total value.
Hi sashby51,
I've moved your discussion to the PDF Forms forum--the folks who visit this forum regularly should be able to point you in the right direction.
Best,
Sara -
Tabular form condition type value of item / column in expression 1
Hi
Question 1
I was wondering if anyone can help with the necessary syntax so that I can set a Condition Type for a column in a Tabular Form.
What I'm trying to do is show or hide a column based on the contents of another column in the same row for instance show column DETAIL or DETAIL_READ_ONLY if column READ_ONLY is set to 'Y'
Value of item / column in expression 1 = #READ_ONLY# or READ_ONLY (alas neither works)
Expression 2 = Y
I can set all the DETAIL or DETAIL_READ_ONLY columns to either hide or show at the same time by
Value of item / column in expression 1 = P100_READ_ONLY (works well but lacks granularity)
Expression 2 = Y
Question 2
Are Tabular Forms such that all fuctionality has to be global, what effects one column must be the same for all
I know that Oracle prefers that developers don't use tabular forms but they are usefull for data visability when setting up related data in the same table.
e.g. surveys, questionnaires etc apps the web was made for
Thanks
DerekHi Sandro
Thanks for replying
The problem I have is Tabular Forms
Detail Text Detail Read Only Read only
Event 1a Event 1b Y
Event 2a Event 2b N
Event 3a Event 3b Y
What I want it to look like is
Detail Text Detail Read Only Read only
___________Event 1b__________ Y
Event 2a_____________________ N
___________Event 3b__________ Y
This would mean that the Text Field containing Event 2 could be updated but the Display Only fields containing Event 1 and Event 3 cannot be changed.
The trick is to be able to mix and match data types for the same data because Tabular Forms columns don't have a conditional read only choice.
Sorry about the rudimentary diagram, but its the old 80 / 20 rule =>20 percent functional
Edited by: derekf on 4/02/2013 17:50 -
Change the Purchase Order : Item - Conditions value
Hi,
How to change the Purchase Order : Item - Conditions value.
In my PO, Item conditions shows the SKTO - Cash Discount value is 0. I want to change the Discount value 10.
How can i change it??Hi,
Goto the Transaction code MN05 and give the CONDITION TYPE SKTO and change the value
MN05 is the Transaction code for Purchase order condition types.
Please check and revert back if you need more details.
regards,
santosh -
Crm_order_maintain ,changing pricing condition value at item level
Hi,
I am trying to change the pricing condition value at item level while creating sales order through CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
I am not able to change the condition value.
Code is below.
wa_inputfields-ref_guid = wa_orderi-guid.
wa_inputfields-ref_kind = 'B'.
wa_inputfields-objectname = 'PRIDOC'.
wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'KBETR'.
append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'KMEIN'.
append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'KPEIN'.
append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'KSCHL'.
append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'WAERS'.
append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
INSERT wa_inputfields INTO TABLE it_inputfields.
wa_pricing_add-KSCHL = 'ZP06'.
wa_pricing_add-WAERS = 'USD'.
wa_pricing_add-KBETR = '10'.
wa_pricing_add-KPEIN = '1'.
wa_pricing_add-KMEIN = 'ST'.
INSERT wa_pricing_add INTO table it_pricing_add .
wa_pricing-REF_GUID = wa_orderi-guid.
wa_pricing-REF_KIND = 'B'.
wa_pricing-PRICING_TYPE = 'A'.
wa_pricing-COND_ADD = it_pricing_add.
wa_pricing-PRICING_PROCEDURE = 'ZVDSP'.
append wa_pricing to it_pricing.
Can you tell me how to overwrite the condition value while creating sales order using crm_order_maintain.?
Regards,
Indhra.EHello Indhra,
Check the CT_INPUT_FIELDS table, in the OBJECTNAME field you will find all the tables that are filled during the function call. Check those tables mentioned in the OBJECTNAME to look for any pricing related data.
When your order is in change mode and you activate debug <b>just before you make the change</b>, the CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN FM call contains <b>data only relevant for the change you just made</b>. In other words, you need to fill exactly the same tables as CRMD_ORDER does.
E.g. You just change the pricing procedure and you see in debug that 5 tables are filled, you must do exactly the same in your code! It's quite anoying but you're using a low-level API FM that can handle ANY transaction type in CRM!
Check it, it works!!
<b>Reward points if useful!</b>
Regards,
Joost
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am making an application that takes an apartment number and number of occupants in that apartment and then displays a number of statistics. So far I haven't had much problem except on a what is probably a very simple problem. I have two buttons, an
-
How to add a system font without image render
Please take a look at www.jumsoft.com website at the left bottom footer of their page. The text "Latest Tweets" is selectable . How can I use this kind of font with muse? Also how can I add a shadow effect to text as this website does it? Thank you
-
Outlook connector shows some deleted recurring events
We discovered an oddity that appears to be with the way Outlook shows a recurring event (seems to be an interpretation problem while reading and partially while writing). I'm using the connector from 139162-03 in either Outlook 2003 or 2007 set to sy
-
Hi Gurus Could some1 please take me through the steps for archiving Internals orders?. Tx OKO5 is out of it as I need to delete from the live system Thanks a lot
-
JAI runs out of heap when resizing big images, Java2D not
Hello, I was doing some tests wit PMIW library (which wraps both Java2D and JAI) and it seems Java2D is much faster and doesnt eats as much memory as JAI (I have tested the native version only). Do you have a clue why? Thanks