Accrual Reconciliation Rebuil - No Report --- problem

Hi friends
i need to run Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild. but i find the report as Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report. I've run this earlier as Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild. why is it showing as Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report? moreover, there is an extra parameter p_op_unit_coa_id is shown in the parameter form. whenever i try to submit the report it says
APP-FND-01404: An invalid style, LANDWIDE240, is specified.
Cause: AOL cannot find a record for the print style LANDWIDE240
Action: Check that the print style LANDWIDE240 is a valid style and that a record exists in FND_PRINTER_STYLESPls help me.
Thanks
Lisan

check this forum thread :
Accrual Reconcilliation Report
/S.P DASH

Similar Messages

Accrual Reconciliation Load Run report performance issue.

we have significant performance issues when running accrual reconciliation load run report. we had to cancel after have it run for a day. any idea on how to resolve it?

We experienced similar issue. As the runtime of this report depends on the input parameters. Remember, your first run of this report going to take significant amount of time and the subsequent runs will be much shorter.
But w had to apply the patches referred in the MOS article to resolve the performance issue.
Accrual Reconciliation Load Run Has Slow Performance [ID 1490578.1]
Thanks,
Sunthar....

Accrual Reconciliation Rebuild - No Report/Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi Experts,
It is well-known that Accrual Reconciliation Report shows out the data from po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all i.e. only that data which resides in po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all table will be picked and showed on the report based on net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity (i.e. depends on the tolerance levels given). But if I want to show the data from backend thru query, i will use this table and give my conditions for net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity. As mentioned in Note:433683.1 in Metalink, it is mentioned that:
The following two columns in the PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL table
determines whether a Transaction appears on the Accrual Reconciliation
Report.
Net_po_line_quantity
Net_po_line_amount
For a Transaction not to appear on the Accrual Reconciliation Report
net transaction quantity AND the net transaction amount for each PO Line must be
less than or equal to the values entered in the tolerance parameters (or <= 0,
which is the default value).
This means I will make my query which should match with the report data:
select * from po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all
where net_po_line_amount>0 and net_po_line_quanity>0;
But I have seen some cases where both these are zero and still shown on the report, i have seen few more cases where these are null and still shown on the report. May be we need to add more conditions or somewhere I am doing wrong! Please suggest what all conditions we should consider while incorporating with this type of requirement.
Any suggestions on this will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Sumir Chawla

Hi,
Pleaser refer the below documentation ...
Accrual Reconciliation Report Errored Out With APP-FND-01564: ORACLE error 942 in FDFGDF [ID 1440284.1]
Regards,
Ivruksha

PO issue (Accrual Reconciliation Report )

Hi,
when run the accrual reconciliation report for PO,I find the quantity *Unit price is not equal Amount when A/P Receipt Match,the details as follows:
when find the original PO line ,find that the PO line's status is cancelled ,the price have changed from 6 to 45 , from 10 to 50 before cancelled this PO lines, how can do now let them equal ?
and check the invoice for this po ,
20081022     1     Bar     20     6     120.00
CH0000059 1     Bar     -20     6     (120.00)
20081022     2     Bar     20 10     200.00
CH0000059 2 Bar     -20 10 (200.00)
CHSZ-Compart Hi-Precision Tech                         Accrual Reconciliation Report                          Report Date:      02-12-2008 20:00
Account:     24.00000.317010.0000.0000.000
PO Number     Item+      Transaction     Src     Org      Date     Document Number     Line      Unit     Quantity      Unit Price      Amount      Variance      Balance
Vendor Name:     ： ShenzhenBaoan
240803218     Pdtn consumables     Receive     PO     CHS     2008-10-29     30509262     1     Bar     -20     6     (120.00)          (120.00)
     Pdtn consumables     Return to Supplier     PO     CHS     2008-11-5     30509262     1     Bar     20     6     120.00           120.00
     Pdtn consumables     A/P Receipt Match      AP     CHS     2008-10-29     20081022     1     Bar     *20     45     120.00           120.00*
     Pdtn consumables     A/P Receipt Match      AP     CHS     2008-11-5     CH0000059     1     Bar     -20     45     (900.00)          (900.00)
     Pdtn consumables     Receive     PO     CHS     2008-10-29     30509262     2     Bar     -20     10     (200.00)          (200.00)
     Pdtn consumables     Return to Supplier     PO     CHS     2008-11-5     30509262     2     Bar     20     10     200.00           200.00
     Pdtn consumables     A/P Receipt Match      AP     CHS     2008-10-29     20081022     2     Bar     *20*     *50*     *200.00*           *200.00*
Pdtn consumables     A/P Receipt Match      AP     CHS     2008-11-5     CH0000059     2     Bar     -20     50     (1,000.00)          (1,000.00)
                              Vendor          Subtotal               (1,580.00)     0     (1,580.00)
                                                       ---------------- -     ---------------     ----------------     GL
                                   Account Subtotal:                     (67,550.27)     0     (67,550.27)     (67,550.27)
                                   Report Total:                     (67,460.15)     -90     (67,550.15)
                                                       ================ =     ===============     ================
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:56 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:57 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:58 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 10:59 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 11:00 PM
Edited by: user638343 on Dec 28, 2008 11:07 PM

have anybody can give advise ?
Edited by: user638343 on Jan 8, 2009 10:24 PM

Closed PO's on Accrual Reconciliation Report

We are getting issue of Closed PO's coming in Accrual Reconciliation Report.
I am not that familier with this report & it's functionality. So need help on this.
Please let me know if I can provide more information on this. Like if you want to see the Report O/p/.
Thanks
Sachin Ahuja

Hi Raghav,
Documents mentioned certainly helped me a lot in having more knowledge on Accrual Reconciliation. However i need to go in depth on one of the document.
I further checked on my issue & looks amount being accounted on Purchaing is different than Amount being accounted in AP. & Difference I can see is in PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL.TRANSACTION_UNIT_PRICE value is different when Innvoice is created.
Can someone point how it's being calculated or why there is mismatch. As per user they simply match the PO on Invoice & have not done anything else. Then why Transaction_Unit_Price got changed.
Please suggest.
Thanks
Sachin Ahuja

Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi All,
I need to understand the concept of accrual reconciliation,
Please let me know a source or plese explain in the forum.
Further let me know if all the PO related trasactions appear in the accrual reconciliation report or only the items where there is a miss match.
Thanks and Regards,
Migara

Hi,
Im sorry.Somehow two issues were posted for the same issue.
However I went through the document,but still I its not clear the meaning of this.
As per the document A/P Line Match - A/P invoice matching transaction for which there is a receipt against the same purchase order and purchase order line.
Does this mean a situation something like this.
PO line 1 has a quantity 10 and unit price 10
and received 5 item in one receipt (receipt 01) and received 5 items in another receipt (receipt 02)
Then the invoice is matched to the receipt 02.
Please let me knw.
Thanks and Regards,
MPH
Edited by: user11337190 on 17-Nov-2010 15:16

Po Accrual Reconciliation report

Hi Sir
Hope you are doing well and good.
I am new to R12 PO. For my client in 11.5.10.2 they have customized Po Accrual Reconciliation report. I came to know that in R11 they use view:PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP and temporary table used in that view is PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP_ALL.
Now we are migrating this report to R12 and the above view was obsolete synonym in R12.
1) After checking thoroughly i came to that temporary table was replaced with CST_AP_PO_RECONCILIATION & CST_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY in R12. And i am unable to found view:PO_ACCRUAL_RECONCILE_TEMP replacement in R12. Can you please help me in this regard.
2) Using the two new tables:CST_AP_PO_
RECONCILIATION & CST_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY, can we modify the query to get the same output as like R11
This is very very urgent request.
Best Regards
Mani

This is the forum for the SQL Developer tool. You need to ask your question in an eBusiness suite forum.

Accounts Payable and PO Accrual Reconciliation Summary Report?

Dear all,
We are using R12.1.3 and doing the reconciliation AP Vs PO Accrual. However, I run the report "Accounts Payable and PO Accrual Reconciliation Summary Report" and found that one record is strange, like the PO Accrual balance is something -10,000 and the Account Payable balanced is 0.00.
What does it mean for my case? Please advice.
Thanks in advance.

Dear all,
I rerun " Accrual Reconciliation Load Run" program with data range. After that I re-run "Accounts Payable and PO Accrual Reconciliation Summary Report" and found that everything is fine now.
I just wondering am I need to run "Accrual Reconciliation Load Run" every month end closing or just run once for up-grade POs?
Please advice.
Thanks.

R12: How to filter AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report based on GL Date

Hi,
Anybody know how to filter AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report based on GL Date from and GL Date to in R12?
Since we just upgraded from 11.5.10 to 12.1.3 and found we cannot filter those report for specific date. It shown all data included the old data from 8 years ago also.
We need to run the report only for specific date only. Please share with me if anyone know about this.
Thanks.

In 12 you can rebuild and run the report for a particular period, but not a single day if that's what's required

URGENT: Grouping in Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hello
Could anyone please explain how grouping is done in the 'Accrual Reconciliation Report' - POXACREC ? How does the group - G_item_vendor work? Is grouping being done here?
My requirement is to customize this report by the logic that : If item number is null, grouping should be done by Description. If anyone has any suggestions, please do reply.
I am working on Oracle Applications version : 11.5.10.2

Hi Anju,
I suggest you to post this query on "oracle applications forum".
Still I have an idea, you can give a try:
Why can't you group on item||Description {concatenating both fields} field. Use this field just for group and use the individual fields for display and other purposes.
Br,
Gouri Sankar

Purchasing Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi all,
DO anyone know why the report with no data. could be the parameters or setting ? We wish to generate the report by weekly basis.. instead of month
Attach is the sample report.
Thanks
Lee
Accrual Reconciliation Report Report Date: 13-MAY-2011 09:36
UNMATCHED RECEIPTS
Report Parameters
Sort By : Vendor
Rebuild Report Information : No
GL Dates From : 01-MAY-11
To : 12-MAY-11
Items From :
To :
Vendors From : A & A
To : Zuzana Voerman
Include All Transactions : Yes
Include Written Off Transactions : No
Aging Number of Days :
Accrual Account :
ABC USD Entities Accrual Reconciliation Report Report Date: 13-MAY-2011 09:36
Sort By Vendor UNMATCHED RECEIPTS Page: 1
From 01-MAY-11 To 12-MAY-11 (USD)
Malaysia LE/OU
***** No Data Found *****
Edited by: SGLEE on May 13, 2011 3:05 AM

check this forum thread :
Accrual Reconcilliation Report
/S.P DASH

Replica of Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement in which I have to make a query which will give an exact replica of what output will be obtained from "Accrual Reconciliation Report" without using temporary table po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all. At the end of the day it should match the report output for the transaction dates passed (i.e. GL date From/To). I made a little query but still the output from my query is not matching to the output what I obtained from the report. Firstly, my question is: Is it possible to have a /make a sql query which will be exact replica of output of the report and if we can achieve this acc to u, what all things/conditions I have to take care while making this sql. I will really appreciate for any kind of help or feedback.
Many Thanks,
Sumir Chawla

Hi Nagamohan,
Here is my script, please check and let me know if I missed some conditions:
SELECT RT.TRANSACTION_ID
,(SELECT DISTINCT RH.SEGMENT1
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_NUMBER"
,(SELECT DISTINCT E2.FULL_NAME
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E2
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND RH.PREPARER_ID = E2.EMPLOYEE_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_PREPARER"
,PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE "PO TYPE"
,V.VENDOR_NAME "VENDOR_NAME"
,TO_CHAR(PHA.CREATION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "PO_CREATION_DATE"
,E1.FULL_NAME "PO_BUYER"
,CC.SEGMENT1||'-'||CC.SEGMENT2||'-'||CC.SEGMENT3||'-'||CC.SEGMENT4||'-'||CC.SEGMENT5||'-'||CC.SEGMENT6||'-'||CC.SEGMENT7||'-'||CC.SEGMENT8 "ACCOUNT"
,PHA.SEGMENT1 "PO_NUMBER"
,NULL "RELEASE_NUMBER"
,PLA.LINE_NUM "LINE_NUMBER"
,MSI.SEGMENT2 "ITEM_NUMBER"
,MSI.PRIMARY_UNIT_OF_MEASURE "UOM"
,MSI.DESCRIPTION "ITEM_DESCRIPTION"
,PLL.QUANTITY
,PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED
,PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED
,RCV.JE_SOURCE_NAME "TRANSACTION_SOURCE"
,'RECEIPT' "DOCUMENT TYPE"
,RSH.RECEIPT_NUM "DOCUMENT NUMBER"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE (YEAR)"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'MON') "DOCUMENT DATE (MONTH)"
,RCV.CURRENCY_CODE "CURRENCY_CODE"
,RT.PO_UNIT_PRICE*NVL(RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE,1) "UNIT_PRICE_(SGD)"
,RT.QUANTITY "TRANSACTION_QUANTITY"
,NVL(RCV.ACCOUNTED_DR,-RCV.ACCOUNTED_CR) "ACCOUNTED_AMOUNT"
,NVL(RCV.ENTERED_DR,-RCV.ENTERED_CR) "ENTERED_AMOUNT"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_DATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_DATE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_TYPE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_TYPE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_RATE"
FROM APPS.RCV_RECEIVING_SUB_LEDGER RCV
,APPS.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS CC
,APPS.RCV_TRANSACTIONS RT
,APPS.PO_HEADERS PHA
,APPS.RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS RSH
,APPS.PO_LINES PLA
,APPS.PO_VENDORS V
,APPS.HR_LOCATIONS HL
,APPS.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS PLL
,APPS.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS MSI
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E1
WHERE RCV.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND RCV.ACTUAL_FLAG='A'
AND PHA.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS = 'APPROVED'
AND PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE = 'STANDARD'
AND PHA.VENDOR_ID = V.VENDOR_ID
AND PHA.AGENT_ID = E1.EMPLOYEE_ID
AND RCV.RCV_TRANSACTION_ID = RT.TRANSACTION_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PHA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PLA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_ID = PLA.PO_LINE_ID
AND PLA.ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID (+)
AND RT.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID = RSH.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_LOCATION_ID = PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID
AND PLL.SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID = HL.LOCATION_ID
AND NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) > NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)
AND (NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) - NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)) > 0.01
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID = RSH.SHIP_TO_ORG_ID
UNION ALL
SELECT RT.TRANSACTION_ID
,(SELECT DISTINCT RH.SEGMENT1
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_NUMBER"
,(SELECT DISTINCT E2.FULL_NAME
FROM APPS.PO_REQUISITION_LINES RL
,APPS.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS RH
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E2
WHERE PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID = RL.LINE_LOCATION_ID (+)
AND RL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = RH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID(+)
AND RH.PREPARER_ID = E2.EMPLOYEE_ID(+)
AND ROWNUM = 1) "PR_PREPARER"
,PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE "PO TYPE"
,V.VENDOR_NAME "VENDOR_NAME"
,TO_CHAR(REL.CREATION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "PO_CREATION_DATE"
,E1.FULL_NAME "PO_BUYER"
,CC.SEGMENT1||'-'||CC.SEGMENT2||'-'||CC.SEGMENT3||'-'||CC.SEGMENT4||'-'||CC.SEGMENT5||'-'||CC.SEGMENT6||'-'||CC.SEGMENT7||'-'||CC.SEGMENT8 "ACCOUNT"
,PHA.SEGMENT1||'-'||REL.RELEASE_NUM "PO_NUMBER"
,REL.RELEASE_NUM "RELEASE_NUMBER"
,PLA.LINE_NUM "LINE_NUMBER"
,MSI.SEGMENT2 "ITEM_NUMBER"
,MSI.PRIMARY_UNIT_OF_MEASURE "UOM"
,MSI.DESCRIPTION "ITEM_DESCRIPTION"
,PLL.QUANTITY
,PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED
,PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED
,RCV.JE_SOURCE_NAME "TRANSACTION_SOURCE"
,'RECEIPT' "DOCUMENT TYPE"
,RSH.RECEIPT_NUM "DOCUMENT NUMBER"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'YYYY') "DOCUMENT DATE (YEAR)"
,TO_CHAR(RT.TRANSACTION_DATE,'MON') "DOCUMENT DATE (MONTH)"
,RCV.CURRENCY_CODE "CURRENCY_CODE"
,RT.PO_UNIT_PRICE*NVL(RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE,1) "UNIT_PRICE_(SGD)"
,RT.QUANTITY "TRANSACTION_QUANTITY"
,NVL(RCV.ACCOUNTED_DR,-RCV.ACCOUNTED_CR) "ACCOUNTED_AMOUNT"
,NVL(RCV.ENTERED_DR,-RCV.ENTERED_CR) "ENTERED_AMOUNT"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_DATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_DATE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_TYPE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_TYPE"
,RT.CURRENCY_CONVERSION_RATE "RECEIPT_EXCHANGE_RATE"
FROM APPS.RCV_RECEIVING_SUB_LEDGER RCV
,APPS.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS CC
,APPS.RCV_TRANSACTIONS RT
,APPS.PO_HEADERS PHA
,APPS.RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS RSH
,APPS.PO_LINES PLA
,APPS.PO_RELEASES REL
,APPS.PO_VENDORS V
,APPS.HR_LOCATIONS HL
,APPS.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS PLL
,APPS.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS MSI
,APPS.HR_EMPLOYEES E1
WHERE RCV.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND RCV.ACTUAL_FLAG='A'
AND PHA.TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE = 'BLANKET'
AND REL.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS = 'APPROVED'
AND REL.PO_HEADER_ID = PHA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND PHA.VENDOR_ID = V.VENDOR_ID
AND REL.AGENT_ID = E1.EMPLOYEE_ID
AND RCV.RCV_TRANSACTION_ID = RT.TRANSACTION_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PHA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_HEADER_ID = PLA.PO_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_ID = PLA.PO_LINE_ID
AND RT.PO_RELEASE_ID = REL.PO_RELEASE_ID
AND PLA.ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID (+)
AND RT.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID = RSH.SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID
AND RT.PO_LINE_LOCATION_ID = PLL.LINE_LOCATION_ID
AND PLL.SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID = HL.LOCATION_ID
AND PLL.PO_RELEASE_ID = REL.PO_RELEASE_ID
AND NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) > NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)
AND (NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_RECEIVED,0) - NVL(PLL.QUANTITY_BILLED,0)) > 0.01
AND MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID = RSH.SHIP_TO_ORG_ID
ORDER BY TRANSACTION_ID;
Thanks,
Sumir

Excluded transactions on the Accrual Reconciliation report

Does anyone know how to investigate a non-zero total in the "Excluded TXN" column on the Accrual Reconciliation report? How can we find out what this means?

I guess you are passing in the quantity and amount tolerances. The logic is:
If you have any outstanding amount or quantity in the PO (net_po_line_amount and net_po_line_quantity in the po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all after you rebuild) and if you are passing in the tolerances to the rebuild report, this excluded transactions will show up.
Say you have po line has qty of 2 and price $44. You have received 2 but billed only 1. You have not yet written this quantity 1 off.
When you run the accrual rebuild you will get the net_po_line_amount as -44 and and net_po_line_quantity as -1 (since you have accrued (more credits) then invioced (less debits)).
Nowif since have not written off this po line, and if you pass amount tolerance as 5 and quantity tolerance as 2 then this $44 shows as excluded (since you told the report to take tolerances into account).
here is the query:
SELECT par.po_header_id,po_line_id,line_location_id,net_po_line_amount,net_po_line_quantity,transaction_amount,par.org_id,poh.segment1
ROUND ( (DECODE (par.write_off_flag
, 'Y', 0
, DECODE ('N'
, 'Y', 0
, 'N', DECODE (SIGN (ABS (par.net_po_line_amount) - 45)
, 1, 0
, DECODE (SIGN ( ABS (ROUND (par.net_po_line_quantity, 4))
- 2
, 1, 0
, par.transaction_amount
/ 4
* 4 zero_bal_total
FROM po_accrual_reconcile_temp_all par
, po_lookup_codes plu
, org_organization_definitions ood
, mtl_system_items msi
,po_headers_all poh
WHERE ood.organization_id = par.transaction_organization_id
AND plu.lookup_type = 'ACCRUAL TRX SOURCE'
AND plu.lookup_code = par.transaction_source_code
AND msi.organization_id=&your master org_Id
AND msi.inventory_item_id (+) = par.inventory_item_id
and net_po_line_amount <>0
and poh.po_header_Id=par.po_header_Id
HTH.
Thanks
Nagamohan

What is "Invoice Price Variance" in Accrual Reconciliation Report

Hi friends
can anyone pls explain me the Invoice Price Variance column data of Accrual Reconciliation Report? how most of the time ive seen this as 0. how can this be more than 0? im just experimenting with Accrual Reconciliation Report. pls help me.
thanks in advance.
LISAN

hi
thanks for your reply. assume that PO total is 150. invoice is created of 100. in this case should i see an amount in Invoice Price Variance? im not seeing any change in Invoice Price Variance. for me what happens here is Transaction Amount - Accounted is shown -50 as its still to create an invoice of amount 50 which is in fact the accrual balance. pls give me a feedback on this. i want to produce a scenario which will make the invoice price variance more or less than 0.
thanks
Lisan

Questions on AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation?

Dear all,
I know the purpose of "The AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report" provides a transactional breakdown of each accrual account with a net balance not equal to zero in a summarized or full transaction details version.
However, I found out that on of the Purchase Order has been done the PO receipt and created an invoice in AP (validate and accounted). But the report still showing PO is 0 and AP is 343,000 in AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation report. I am just wondering what I have done wrong suppose the PO and AP should be equal in that case.
Please advice.
Thanks.

Is there any miscellaneous transactions recorded in error to your accrual accounts,These miscellaneous transactions or transactions unrelated to purchase order receipts may be from Payables.

Accrual Reconciliation Rebuil - No Report --- problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for