ACE Module not supporting

Hi,
We have migrated CSM to ACE Module recentlym all the applications are working fine. But one of our real server , Hosting team did NIC Teaming (Active-Active) which was working fine but not with ACE Module (Briding Mode).
My assumtion is because of ACE in Bridge mode all the non-loadbalancing traffic has to go through ACE Module, So we couldnt access the server directly. If ACE is in One-armed mode i think it should be fine.
But with bridge mode do we have any option to make it working.

there is a restriction regarding NIC teaming in active/active mode.
The ACE uses an hardcoded mac-to-IP mapping with ARP. As with active active nic teaming you'll have 2 different mac addresses, the one which is not present in the ARP cache of the ACE is considered as a security violation.

Similar Messages

  • Wireless Module Not Supported...in the manual it is?

    HP maual located here: http://h10032.www1.hp.com/ctg/Manual/c02770268.pdf
    Page 20 Chapter 3 it lists:
    Intel Centrino® Wireless-N 1000 (802.11b/g/n) 593530-001
    So I ordered this from the HP parts store and received it today and the laptop posts with a Wireless Module Not Supported. WLAN Module ID 702 message.
    So how do I proceed from here? Laptop came with an ralink card that only connected at 72Mbps, the atheros AR9285 constantly connects at 65Mbps unless I reset my router every time I connect.
    My laptop is a HP Pavilion g6-1a40ca
    Help please!
    Marc

    Thanks for replying
    Looks like modding the bios is the only way I'll get something better into this laptop. All I know is that the two officially supported cards I have right here are terribly slow/flaky. Going by the manual I really don't have any other choice in wireless cards. This is a great laptop for the price, just wish it didn't come crippled.
    Oh I know...lol...I'll buy a usb one and soldier it onto one of the usb ports internally. j/k
    Thanks again for clarifying for me. If anyone has anything additional to add to this thread in future about adding support official or unofficial, please post it here.
    Thanks,
    Marc

  • VWIC is showing as "WIC module not supported/disabled in this slot"

    Hello All,
    please help me on this asap!!
    Smart Init is enabled
    smart init is sizing iomem
                     TYPE      MEMORY_REQ
              HWIC Slot 0      0x00200000
                   PVDM 0      0x00200000
        Onboard devices &
             buffer pools      0x0228F000
                   TOTAL:      0x0268F000
    Rounded IOMEM up to: 40Mb.
    Using 7 percent iomem. [40Mb/512Mb]
                  Restricted Rights Legend
    Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is
    subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph
    (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted
    Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph
    (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer
    Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013.
               cisco Systems, Inc.
               170 West Tasman Drive
               San Jose, California 95134-1706
    Cisco IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(1)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Mon 22-Mar-10 02:13 by prod_rel_team
    This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
    States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
    use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
    third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
    Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
    compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
    agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
    to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
    A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
    http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
    If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
    [email protected].
    Cisco CISCO2901/K9 (revision 1.0) with 483328K/40960K bytes of memory.
    Processor board ID FGL162722DK
    2 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
    DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity enabled.
    255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
    250880K bytes of ATA System CompactFlash 0 (Read/Write)
    Press RETURN to get started!
    *Mar  1 00:00:04.931: %IOS_LICENSE_IMAGE_APPLICATION-6-LICENSE_LEVEL: Module name = c2900 Next reboot level = ipbasek9 and License = ipbasek9
    *Mar  1 00:00:05.019: %IOS_LICENSE_IMAGE_APPLICATION-6-LICENSE_LEVEL: Module name = c2900 Next reboot level = uck9 and License = uck9
    *Jan 23 07:37:07.403: %IFMGR-7-NO_IFINDEX_FILE: Unable to open nvram:/ifIndex-table No such file or directory
    *Jan 23 07:37:15.119: %MAINBOARD-1-UNKNOWN_WIC: wic card in location 0/0 has an unknown id 0x6EF
    *Jan 23 07:37:18.679: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface VoIP-Null0, changed state to up
    *Jan 23 07:37:18.679: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0, changed state to reset
    *Jan 23 07:37:18.679: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to reset
    *Jan 23 07:37:19.887: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/0, changed state to down
    *Jan 23 07:37:19.887: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
    *Jan 23 07:37:20.823: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0, changed state to down
    *Jan 23 07:37:20.823: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
    *Jan 23 07:37:21.063: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console
    *Jan 23 07:37:23.083: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to administratively down
    *Jan 23 07:37:23.755: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted --
    Cisco IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(1)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Mon 22-Mar-10 02:13 by prod_rel_team
    *Jan 23 07:37:23.759: %SNMP-5-COLDSTART: SNMP agent on host Hewitt_Noida is undergoing a cold start
    *Jan 23 07:37:37.483: %DSPRM-5-UPDOWN: DSP 1 in slot 0, changed state to up
    *Jan 23 07:37:37.483: %DSPRM-5-UPDOWN: DSP 3 in slot 0, changed state to up
    *Jan 23 07:37:37.483: %DSPRM-5-UPDOWN: DSP 2 in slot 0, changed state to up
    Hewitt_Noida>
    Hewitt_Noida>
    Hewitt_Noida>
    Hewitt_Noida>en
    Hewitt_Noida#
    Hewitt_Noida#
    Hewitt_Noida#sh diag
    Slot 0:
            C2901 Mother board 2GE, integrated VPN and 4W Port adapter, 2 ports
            Port adapter is analyzed
            Port adapter insertion time 00:00:56 ago
            EEPROM contents at hardware discovery:
            PCB Serial Number        : FOC1624697D
            Hardware Revision        : 1.0
            Part Number              : 73-11834-08
            Top Assy. Part Number    : 800-30795-06
            Board Revision           : A0
            Deviation Number         : 123694
            Fab Version              : 03
            Product (FRU) Number     : CISCO2901/K9
            Version Identifier       : V06
            CLEI Code                : CMMJA00ARA
            Processor type           : C1
            Chassis Serial Number    : FGL162722DK
            Chassis MAC Address      : d48c.b51a.b668
            MAC Address block size   : 72
            Manufacturing Test Data  : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
            EEPROM format version 4
            EEPROM contents (hex):
              0x00: 04 FF C1 8B 46 4F 43 31 36 32 34 36 39 37 44 40
              0x10: 06 17 41 01 00 82 49 2E 3A 08 C0 46 03 20 00 78
              0x20: 4B 06 42 41 30 88 00 01 E3 2E 02 03 CB 8C 43 49
              0x30: 53 43 4F 32 39 30 31 2F 4B 39 89 56 30 36 20 D9
              0x40: 04 40 C1 CB C2 C6 8A 43 4D 4D 4A 41 30 30 41 52
              0x50: 41 09 C1 C2 8B 46 47 4C 31 36 32 37 32 32 44 4B
              0x60: C3 06 D4 8C B5 1A B6 68 43 00 48 C4 08 00 00 00
              0x70: 00 00 00 00 00 F3 00 65 40 01 25 41 00 87 42 00
              0x80: 00 F8 00 28 03 E8 1C 89 07 D0 20 21 0B B8 20 93
              0x90: 0F A0 21 2F 13 88 21 83 17 70 21 A8 1B 58 21 B0
              0xA0: 1F 40 21 AB 23 28 21 79 27 10 21 78 41 01 1D 42
              0xB0: 00 00 F8 00 28 03 E8 1C 20 07 D0 1F 40 0B B8 20
              0xC0: 6C 0F A0 21 34 13 88 21 34 17 70 21 98 1B 58 21
              0xD0: 98 1F 40 21 98 23 28 21 34 27 10 21 34 FF FF FF
              0xE0: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
              0xF0: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
            PVDM Slot 0:
            128-channel (G.711) Voice/Fax PVDM3 DSP DIMM PVDM daughter card
            Hardware Revision        : 1.0
            Part Number              : 73-11810-03
            Board Revision           : C0
            Deviation Number         : 0
            Fab Version              : 03
            PCB Serial Number        : FOC1602145Q
            RMA Test History         : 00
            RMA Number               : 0-0-0-0
            RMA History              : 00
            Processor type           : 00
            Product (FRU) Number     : PVDM3-128
            Version Identifier       : V01
            EEPROM format version 4
            EEPROM contents (hex):
              0x00: 04 FF 40 05 DC 41 01 00 82 49 2E 22 03 42 43 30
              0x10: 88 00 00 00 00 02 03 C1 8B 46 4F 43 31 36 30 32
              0x20: 31 34 35 51 03 00 81 00 00 00 00 04 00 09 00 CB
              0x30: 8F 50 56 44 4D 33 2D 31 32 38 20 20 20 20 20 20
              0x40: 89 56 30 31 20 D9 02 40 C1 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
              0x50: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
              0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
              0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
            WIC Slot 0:
            Unknown WAN daughter card
            WIC module not supported/disabled in this slot
            Hardware Revision        : 1.0
            Top Assy. Part Number    : 800-34658-01
            Part Number              : 73-13420-01
            Board Revision           : B0
            Deviation Number         : 124402
            Fab Version              : 05
            PCB Serial Number        : FOC16100L9C
            Version Identifier       : V01
            Product (FRU) Number     : VWIC3-2MFT-T1/E1
            CLEI Code                : COUIA7NCAA
            RMA Test History         : 00
            RMA Number               : 0-0-0-0
            RMA History              : 00
            EEPROM format version 4
            EEPROM contents (hex):
              0x00: 04 FF 40 06 EF 41 01 00 C0 46 03 20 00 87 62 01
              0x10: 82 49 34 6C 01 42 42 30 88 00 01 E5 F2 02 05 C1
              0x20: 8B 46 4F 43 31 36 31 30 30 4C 39 43 89 56 30 31
              0x30: 20 CB 90 56 57 49 43 33 2D 32 4D 46 54 2D 54 31
              0x40: 2F 45 31 C6 8A 43 4F 55 49 41 37 4E 43 41 41 03
              0x50: 00 81 00 00 00 00 04 00 D9 03 40 C1 CB FF FF FF
              0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
              0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
    Hewitt_Noida#

    Hi Akshay,
    As per
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/data_sheet_c36-609138.html
    VWIC3-1MFT-T1/E1 is supported since 15.1(1)T1 and later.
    Make sure you have this minimum IOS.
    HTH
    Manish

  • Wireless module not supported

    I have a DV6Z-6C00 CTO laptop notbook and I recently had to install a new wireless card but I keep getting a Wireless module not supported error. I checked with the manual and I ordered a Intel Centrino-N 1000 WLAN Module (593530-001 replacement #) and I checked on the actual card (and they match). So why am I getting this error, and how can I fix it?
    Btw I have Windows 8

    Is the wireless card an actual HP card? It is not enough that it be the same Intel chipset card.

  • ACE modules not syncing up

    Hi,
    I was adding logging and snmp to my ACE modules this weekend. I first made the changes to the primary ACE module and did a wr mem; I then went to my secondary module and noticed that the modules did not sync.
    After some troubleshooting; I decided to reboot the secondary module, when the module came back, it was in sync.
    As anyone run into this issue before? What is the command that will show me who is my primary module and the state of the modules?
    I am running ACE code: A2.1.2
    Regards,
    John...

    Thank you for your reply; I think that this was my problem:
    14:1007 => Feb 01 07:57:27: ha_process_message:1818 Running sync info: mode 0, s
    tatus 0, reason Detected license mismatch with peer, disabling running-config au
    to sync
    14:1008 => Feb 01 07:57:27: ha_process_message:1822 Startup sync info: mode 0, s
    tatus 0, reason Detected license mismatch with peer, disabling running-config au
    to sync
    I first upgraded the license on my primary and made my changes, then tried to sync. The only problem I see here is that when I did the wr mem the module starting to sync and said that the sync process was complete.
    John...

  • ACE module not load balancing across two servers

    We are seeing an issue in a context on one of our load balancers where an application doesn't appear to be load balancing correctly across the two real servers.  At various times the application team is seeing active connections on only one real server.  They see no connection attempts on the other server.  The ACE sees both servers as up and active within the serverfarm.  However, a show serverfarm confirms that the load balancer sees current connections only going to one of the servers.  The issue is fixed by restarting the application on the server that is not receiving any connections.  However, it reappears again.  And which server experiences the issue moves back and forth between the two real servers, so it is not limited to just one of the servers.
    The application vendor wants to know why the load balancer is periodically not sending traffic to one of the servers.  I'm kind of curious myself.  Does anyone have some tips on where we can look next to isolate the cause?
    We're running A2(3.3).  The ACE module was upgraded to that version of code on a Friday, and this issue started the following Monday.  The ACE has 28 contexts configured, and this one context is the only one reporting any issues since the upgrade.
    Here are the show serverfarm statistics as of today:
    ACE# show serverfarm farma-8000
    serverfarm     : farma-8000, type: HOST
    total rservers : 2
                                                    ----------connections-----------
           real                  weight state        current    total      failures
       ---+---------------------+------+------------+----------+----------+---------
       rserver: server#1
           x.x.x.20:8000      8      OPERATIONAL  0          186617     3839
       rserver: server#2
           x.x.x.21:8000      8      OPERATIONAL  67         83513      1754

    Are you enabling sticky feature? What kind of predictor are you using?
    If sticky feature is enabled and one rserver goes down, traffic will leans to one side.
    Even after the rserver retuns to up, traffic may continue to lean due to sticky feature.
    The behavior seems to depend on the configuration.
    So, please let me know a part of configuration?
    Regards,
    Yuji

  • Can not import ACE module to ANM

    Hello,
    Good day.
    I recently facing an interesting problem.
    We are running ANM 5.1.0 to manage our LB contexts, those contexts are configured on ACE20-MOD-K9 module which installed in Catalyst6500 switch. Our installation is like this, two ACE20-MOD-K9 modules installed into same Catalyst6513 different slots. And  those two ACE modules serves different Data Halls, contexts configured on those modules are completely seperated, different VLAN, different subnet no relation at all.
    I'm able to import the catalyst chassis into ANM and under Config>Guided Setup>Import Device>Modules, I'm able to see both ACE modules but only one module able to be imported, another one I can not even choose it. There are slightly difference those two modules show themselves in that page. The one I'm able to import shows exactly it's module type and version number but another one is showing someting strange.
    Slot#      Model                     Type            Serial #      State                 Version                Description                                      #VC
    3            ACE20-MOD-K9      ACE v2.3      XXXXXX      up                     A2(3.5)                Application Control Engine Module      28
    9            ACE20-MOD-K9      Module         XXXXXX      Not Imported      ace2t_main_d      Application Control Engine Module      N/A  <---problem module
    Does any was facing samiliar problem?
    Thanks

    I think I found something related to my issue.
    In ANM operating Guidance,section"Importing ACE Modules after the Host Chassis has been Imported" mentioned some restriction. The module in slot 9 actually has samiliar situation, show module commands shows that Catalyst chassis doesn't really recognize the software version that might caused ANM not able to figure out if that module is supported or not so it makes a simple decision deny import. I will try to reboot that module see if we can fix this issue.
    "Guidelines and Restrictions
    ANM 3.0 and greater releases do not support the importing of an ACE module that contains an A1(6.x) software release or an ACE appliance that contains an A1(7.x) or A1(8.x) software release. If you attempt to import an ACE that supports one of these releases, ANM displays a message to instruct you that it failed to import the unrecognized ACE configuration and that device discovery failed.
    However, if you perform an ANM upgrade (for example, from ANM 2.2 to ANM 3.0), and the earlier ANM release contained an inventory with an ACE module that supported the A1(6x) software release or an ACE appliance that supported the A1(7.x) or A1(8.x) software release, ANM 3.0 (and greater) allows the A1(x) software release to reside in the ANM database and will support operations for the release. ANM prevents a new import of an ACE module or ACE appliance that contains the unsupported software version.
    We strongly recommend that you upgrade your ACE module or ACE appliance to a supported ACE software release, and that you instruct ANM to recognize the updated release. See the "Instructing ANM to Recognize an ACE Module Software Upgrade" section.
    See the Supported Device Tables for the Cisco Application Networking Manager for a complete list of supported ACE module and ACE appliance software releases."
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/application_networking_manager/5.2/user/guide/UG_manage_devices.html

  • [UDP fast age support for ACE Module]

    Hello,
    I'm testing 2 ACE modules running A3.0.0 for DNS load balancing (UDP). We're testing this by using a DNS query generator that (always) seems to use the same UDP source port when originating these queries. At the moment, the ACE module is hardly doing any load-balancing.
    It looks to me like, that because of this, the ACE believes it's the same session (connection) and doesn't really load-balance, so I started looking for a solution and found the fast-age udp feature. But, it seems this is not supported on my ACE modules. Can any one offer another solution and/or look at my config and see if there is another way to achieve load balancing in a testing environment when using a tool like the one I described?
    (I put it that way because i believe in real life since queries come from different IP addresses and randomized udp ports, the ACE module will be just fine).
    Thanks in advance!
    c.

    Hi Carlos,
    Correct. The 3.0(0) is really misleading. You need to start with the "A" - so you really have 1.6.3a installed.
    The "show version" for V2 is slightly better -
    system: Version A2(1.2) [build 3.0(0)A2(1.2)
    Cathy

  • ACE module support for IPv6 ?

    what is the latest on IPv6 support for ACE module? I saw something saying 2HCY10, but that's where we are now. Any documentation pointers to current compatability and or roadmap are greatly appreciated.
    thanks
    Bob O.

    As mklemovitch described in the following thread, IPv6 will be
    supported on ACE30 module but not in the initial release.
    There is no plan for ACE20 module.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3192517#3192517
    I'm not sure but maybe around Q3 CY11 or later.
    I cannot see the documentation regarding this feature on CCO.
    I would suggest to contact your account team for details.
    Regards,
    Yuji

  • ACS support for ACE Module

    Does ACS for Windows 3.3 support AAA for the ACE module?

    I don't think that is correct. I am still
    having issues with ACE and ACS. See below:
    ACE version Software
    loader: Version 0.95
    system: Version A1(7b) [build 3.0(0)A1(7b)
    Cisco ACS version 4.0.1
    I am trying to authenticate admin users with AAA authentication for ACE management.
    This is what I've done:
    ACE-lab/Admin(config)# tacacs-server host 192.168.3.10 key 123456 port 49
    warning: numeric key will not be encrypted
    ACE-lab/Admin(config)# aaa group server tacacs+ cciesec
    ACE-lab/Admin(config-tacacs+)# server ?
    TACACS+ server name
    ACE-lab/Admin(config-tacacs+)# server 192.168.3.10
    can not find the TACACS+ server
    specified TACACS+ server not found, please configure it using tacacs-server host ... and then retry
    ACE-lab/Admin(config-tacacs+)#

  • Is the ACE Module support IPV6?

    dear all
    is the ACE module support IPV6?
    best regards

    The ACE does not currently support IPv6 but it is being looked at to be added to the feature set.

  • When will ANM support ACE module A2(3.0)?

    Hello,
    We are using ANM 2.2 to manage our ACE modules running A2(2.2). I would like to upgrade our ACE modules to version A2(3.0). It was released on 12/Oct/2009 but ANM 2.2 still does not support it (although it does support A2(1.6a) which was published on 20/Oct/2009, after A2(3.0)). And 2.2 seems to be the latest version of ANM.
    When can we expect ANM to officially support ACE module A2(3.0)?
    Regards,
    Marc.

    anm 3.0 will support ACE A2(3.0).
    The current schedule date for next anm release is jan 2010.
    Gilles.

  • IOS XR deny ace not supported in access list

    Hi everybody,
    We´ve a 10G interface, this is a MPLS trunk between one ASR 9010 and a 7613, and the first thing that we do is through a policy-map TK-MPLS_TG we make a shape of 2G to the interface to the output:
    interface TenGigE0/3/0/0
     cdp
     mtu 1568
     service-policy output TK-MPLS_TG
     ipv4 address 172.16.19.134 255.255.255.252
     mpls
      mtu 1568
    policy-map TK-MPLS_TG
    class class-default
      service-policy TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN
      shape average 2000000000 bps
      bandwidth 2000000 kbps
    and we´ve the policy TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN as a service-policy inside, this new policy  help us to asign bandwidth percent to 5 class-map, wich in turn match with experimental values classified when they got in to the router:
    class-map match-any W_RTP
     match mpls experimental topmost 5
     match dscp ef
     end-class-map
    class-map match-any W_EMAIL
     match mpls experimental topmost 1
     match dscp cs1
     end-class-map
    class-map match-any W_VIDEO
     match mpls experimental topmost 4 3
     match dscp cs3 cs4
     end-class-map
    class-map match-any W_DATOS-CR
     match mpls experimental topmost 2
     match dscp cs2
     end-class-map
    class-map match-any W_AVAIL
     match mpls experimental topmost 0
     match dscp default
     end-class-map
    policy-map TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN
    class W_RTP
      bandwidth percent 5
    class W_VIDEO
      bandwidth percent 5
    class W_DATOS-CR
      bandwidth percent 30
    class W_EMAIL
      bandwidth percent 15
    class W_AVAIL
      bandwidth percent 2
    class class-default
    end-policy-map
    what we want to do is to assign a especific bandwidth to the proxy to the output using the class W_AVAIL, the proxy is 150.2.1.100. We´ve an additional requirement, wich is not apply this "rate" to some networks we are going to list only 4 in the example, so what we did was a new policy-map with a new class-map and a new ACL :
    ipv4 access-list PROXY-GIT-MEX
    10 deny ipv4 host 150.2.1.100 10.15.142.0 0.0.0.255
    20 deny ipv4 host 150.2.1.100 10.15.244.0 0.0.0.255
    30 deny ipv4 host 150.2.1.100 10.18.52.0 0.0.0.127
    40 deny ipv4 host 150.2.1.100 10.16.4.0 0.0.0.255
    50 permit tcp host 150.2.1.100 any
    60 permit tcp host 10.15.221.100 any
    policy-map EDGE-MEX3-PXY
     class C_PXY-GIT-MEX3
      police rate 300 mbps
     class class-default
     end-policy-map
    class-map match-any C_PXY-GIT-MEX3
     match access-group ipv4 PROXY-GIT-MEX
     end-class-map
    we asign a policy rate of 300 mbps to the class inside the policy EDGE-MEX3-PXY and finally we put this new policy inside the class W_AVAIL of the policy TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN
    policy-map TK-MPLS_EDGE-WAN
    class W_RTP
      bandwidth percent 5
    class W_VIDEO
      bandwidth percent 5
    class W_DATOS-CR
      bandwidth percent 30
    class W_EMAIL
      bandwidth percent 15
    class W_AVAIL
      service-policy EDGE-MEX3-PXY
    class class-default
    end-policy-map
    and we get this:
    Wed Sep 17 18:35:36.537 UTC
    % Failed to commit one or more configuration items during a pseudo-atomic operation. All changes made have been reverted. Please issue 'show configuration failed' from this session to view the errors
    RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:ED_MEX_1(config-pmap-c)#show configuration failed
    Wed Sep 17 18:35:49.662 UTC
    !! SEMANTIC ERRORS: This configuration was rejected by
    !! the system due to semantic errors. The individual
    !! errors with each failed configuration command can be
    !! found below.
    !!% Deny ace not supported in access-list: InPlace Modify Error: Policy TK-MPLS_TG: 'km' detected the 'warning' condition 'Deny ace not supported in access-list'
    end
    Any  kind of help is very appreciated.

    That is correct, due to the way the class-matching is implemented in the TCAM, only permit statements in an ACL can be used for QOS class-matching based on ACL.
    unfortunately, you'll need to redefine the policy class match in such a way that it takes the permit only.
    if you have some traffic that you want to exclude you could do something like this:
    access-list PERMIT-ME
    1 permit
    2 permit
    3 permit
    access-list DENY-me
    !the exclude list
    1 permit
    2 permit
    3 permit
    policy-map X
    class DENY-ME
    <dont do anything> or set something rogue (like qos-group)
    class PERMIT-ME
    do here what you wanted to do as earlier.
    eventhough the permit and deny may be overlapping in terms of match.
    only the first class is matched here, DENY-ME.
    cheers!
    xander

  • When I publish a SWF/HTML5 module with Captivate 8 and try to run it using IE9 - I get the following error "The content you are viewing is not supported in the current Document Mode" - anyone know why?

    When I publish a SWF/HTML5 module with Captivate 8 and try to run it using IE9 - I get the following error "The content you are viewing is not supported in the current Document Mode" - anyone know why?

    TLCMediaDesign wrote:
    I've seen a lot of threads about getting rid of these kind of messages. Those messages are there for a reason most of the time. If you have CSS animations or other HTML5 standards that cannot be rendered in IE9 they won't magically start working becuse you got rid of a message. I use IE9 since that is the minimum standard for the client. I have never seen that message publishing to HTML5 content.
    IMO, if your client has IE9 I think that you should develop with IE9 in mind not IE11.
    When you say "develop with IE9 in mind not IE11" do you mean use SWF instead of HTML5? I used the standard question types, and a converted PowerPoint presentation. I didn't add anything out of the ordinary.

  • Remote device does not support servicedell wireless 350 bluetooth module + remote device does not support service

    Hello,
    I have a Palm Centro Phone and Dell Latitude D610 with a  Dell wireless 350 bluetooth module. I can send pics from phone to laptop, but when i try to send from my laptop to phone, I get the following message:
    remote device does not support service
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks,
    George
    Post relates to: Centro (AT&T)

    Hi George, have you paired the two devices as a "Trusted Pair"?
    Try pairing them from the Centro side.
    WyreNut
    Post relates to: Centro (AT&T)
    I am a Volunteer here, not employed by HP.
    You too can become an HP Expert! Details HERE!
    If my post has helped you, click the Kudos Thumbs up!
    If it solved your issue, Click the "Accept as Solution" button so others can benefit from the question you asked!

Maybe you are looking for

  • No Time Capsule Problems!!!

    I am not a networking genius. And I am not an Apple Fan Boy. I setup the time capsule and I haven't had any big problems. When it won't update or connect I used a cable and it worked. And Since then I have it running wirelessly. The first back up wen

  • Satellite U845W-S400 - how to open-up the laptop to put in a SSD

    Hello everyone, I would like to know how to open-up the laptop to put in a SSD. It has 6 screws on the bottom and I assume some under the keyboard. I do need a guide however to know for sure where they are before I start prying things open and might

  • How to analyze routine in  SD (VOFM)

    Hi, how to find out why a SD routine is developed and what its doing? I'm preparing some specs and need this info. all i knew is 5 routines RV60B900, RV60C900, RV45C900, RV45C911, RV45C912 have been developed...... I don't have knowledge on the SD ro

  • Mail merge functionality

    Hi I am trying to import an Excel spreadsheet with highlighted columns I have assigned into a working PDF document with the fields assigned so that it pulls similar to a mail merge in Microsoft Word. Your copy and paste ability on the FormCentral com

  • How do I resolve a "duplicate IP address" error following migration?

    I just finished a Time-Machine-to-iMac Migration (via Time Capsule) but it says: "A static IP address on AirPort has been transferred to this computer. Make sure not to connect your old computer to the same network as this computer."  It was my inten