Acquistion value negative in area 01 while doing MIRO

Hi Gurus,
Lot of threds were posted on this error message but my scenario looks different.
We have acquired an asset through PO-GR.
The sequence of GR transactions:
1. Acquistion posted through GR for $100.
2. Reversed the GR.
3. Acquisition posted through GR for $102.
4. Reversed teh GR.
5. Acquisition posted through GR for $1000.
Now, we are trying to do IR using MIRO transaction and the system showing three line items in simulation.
1. Posting to vendor account for $1000.
2. Posting to trade AP account for $1000.
3. Posting to Asset reconciliation account for $0.
The document is balanced but when we try to post, it is giving a message "Acquistion value negative in area 01".
First of all, I dont understand why the third line item is generated and why the system is giving this message when we are not posing a negative value.
I have checkd the depreciation area 01 settings and it is allowing only positive and zero value for acquisions.
Please share your thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Mano.

Hi MS,
I appreciate your suggestion but as i mentioned in my post we are not posting any negative value to the asset.It is not a credit memo either just an invoice.
Thx,
Mano.

Similar Messages

Acquistion Value Negative in Area 01 while posting Goods Receipt (MIGO)

While posting a Goods Receipt am facing the error Acquistion Value Negative in Area 01.
The related Purchasing Document has an Account Assignment as AUC.
I have checked the Asset Master of that AUC. In the Depreciation Areas Tab when I am
trying to put the negative values allowed, it says that E669 Fiscal year 2009 is already closed in Financial Accounting.
Practically it is not possible for me to open the fical year 2009 in Financial Accounting since our Fiscal Year Variant is V3(April-March) and we currently in the period
05/2010.
Point to be considered is that Year end closing for Fixed Assets (AJAB) for 2008 is complete and year 2009 for Fixed Assets should ideally be open.
Please let me how to handle the situation without opening the closed Fiscal Year in Financial Accounting.
Regards
Gemini

Gemini,
First set your COD with OAPL.
Go to OADB and choose all values allowed for acquisition value under management of values for your effected dep area.
SAVE and import these settings to your production system and post your GRN.
Thanks,
Srinu

Acquisition value negative in area

Dear All ,
I got an error that is "Acquisition value negative in area " while running CJ88 .
The total of APC for that asset is zero , not have negatif balance.
( The option of negatif value is allowed is not selected on asset.)
Why i got that error ? Do you have any idea ?
Thanks , Best Regards
Dash

Hi,
Typically negative acquisition of assets will not be allowed. However, instances like CIP/AUC assets have it enabled.
To check, go to asset master (AS03) >> Depreciaiton area tab
Double click on the area and check if 'Negative acquisition' is ticked.
Regards,
Sridevi

Account dertermination error while doing MIRO for third party PO

Hello,
This is regarding error message while doing MIRO (IR)
There is already a PO in the system with item category S ( Third Party ) &
Acc assignment object u2013 C (Sales order).
For this PO , I could find 10 invoices already posted in the system.
Between when these invoices were posted , there were some changes done to the PO.
But even after those changes , many invoices were posted in the system,
But now , when I try to post the invoice , I am getting the below error message.
the error message is ** Account determination for entry SKPL WRX 0002 _ 1020 not possible** while posting.
Message no. M8147
Diagnosis
The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key SKPL WRX 0002 _ 1020 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:
u2022 Chart of account
u2022 Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
u2022 Valuation grouping code
u2022 Account grouping code
u2022 Valuation class
System Response
The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.
Proceed
Note
The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.
I have checked the entry in OMWD, where valuation grouping code is maintained against the valuation area & company code.
PLEASE SUGGEST ME SOME SOLUTION.
Thanks,
Vinoth

Hi Raman,
Yes, still i am getting error.
before when the invoice is posted , there is no error.
there are some 10 invoices posted already , but there are some changes done in the PO , after that they could post two invoices but for the third invoice , i am getting this error.
when the invoive is posted without error , these are the account movements that are hit
Here
441510 is a vendor account
61799410 is a WBS element G/L account
27411000 is a G/L for tax.
What could have pulled out this WRX error (Account determination for entry SKPL WRX 0002 _1020 not possible ) for me????
can u suggest me some solutions.
Thanks,
Vinoth

Error while doing miro of network purchase order ( no funds center entered/

Hi,
we are facing one problem while doing miro of network service purchase order. System is giving message 'No funds center entered/derived in item 00030'.
We have activated funds management in Jul'10. The said network service PO belong to previous year. Also we have changed
commitment item of GL account related to concerned service order in Jul'10 & posted GRN one in apr'10 & one aug'10.
System is not allowing to cancel the service entry sheet.
Can anybody help on this.
regards
abhishek

we had activated the trace facility for FMDEIRIVE & found that all FC/Commitment item derived correctly. But while posting the document it is throwing an error.
Regards
Abhishek

While doing MIRO, i am getting error:-Tax code V0 country IN does not exist

hi frds,
while doing miro. i am getting this error:-
pls correct me
Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
Message no. FF713
Diagnosis
You entered a tax code which is not defined for the country of the company code to be posted to in the tax calculation procedure.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
Check whether the company code is assigned to the correct country and whether the correct tax calculation procedure has been entered for the company code country.
Create a new tax code if necessary.
Caution:
Since it is possible that the tables in question are being updated at a different time on another computer, it can take a certain amount of time for the tax code to be on all local machines in client server architectures after saving the new code.
regards,
william

hi
go to ftxp choose tax code v0
here in first input field give 00
then select that field and click on gl acct tab
here mention a gl or go to ob40 and mention gl for the acct key of that field
try finding
Tax code country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
on SDN u will get many threads
Tax code XX country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN (MIRO Error)
conclusion is u must get acct for at least one condition in the tax code
regards
kunal

Error while doing MIRO-Perform Plan price

Hi ,
We are on ECC 6 and we are getting error as "Perform Plan price for the material" while doing MIRO.
*Information:*
Price is different in Purchase requisition and PO&GR.MM03 is having proce control as "S" and the M Master is having both Moving price and standard price.
I tried changing the price through MR21 but still didn't worked.
Pl let me know if you need more info..
Thanks a lot in advance for early reply.
Govind

Hi,
Thanks for the reply. Since we are not using GR feature and we have not reversed the GR anytime.
Regards,
Lovkesh

Purchase order Budget not reversed while doing MIRO

Hi,
Here, we are using funds management for budget analysis with update profile 350 and other setting tick on Goods Receipt only. while doing PR/PO it is coming to commitment budget. Goods Receipt no FM document created.
Strange behavior of system is , while doing MIRO system is not reversing PO budget and updated double consumed in commitment item.
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal shah

Hi,
If you have only GR ticked in OFUP, why would you expect MIRO to have an impact on PO's commitment? As for the fact, that GR document does not create FM posting, you have to check FM assignment of GR and make sure that commitment items are duly defined.
Regards,
Eli

Region to pick based on branch vendor while doing MIRO

Dear All,
following is the scenario :
PO is created on branch vendor (with a HO vendor mentioned in master). While doing MIRO, the system automatically replaces the branch vendor with the Head office vendor (as mentioned in master). The region taken for tax purpose is the region of the HO vendor.
Now the requirement is that, while doing the MIRO, the system should pick up the region of the branch vendor and not HO vendor. Will have to create/ write an exit or use substitution.
Can somebody eleborate how should the logic be mapped for exit in connection with substitution?
Thanks,
Tapan

Dear Alok,
Thanks for the reply. We actually already started to work on it. But, as we want to replace HO vendor with branch vendor during MIRO as already mentioned, we are still awaiting what logic should be mapped in substitution as well as exit for that.
It would be great help if you can throw some light on the same.
Thanks
Tapan

While doing MIRO with unplaned cost system is picking accurel G/L account

Dear All,
While doing MIRO with unplaned delivery cost system is picking accural G/L account rather than cost element from PO.
Thanks
KMR

Hi,
It depeneds how the Unplanned Delivery Cost has been configured for the comany code.
SPRO>Material Management>LIV>Incoming Invoice>Configure Unplanned Delivery Cost.
Against Comapny Code put blank if : Unplanned delivery costs are distributed among the invoice items ( here the Materil account or the Account in the PO will be used. )
Put 2 if : Unplanned delivery costs are posted to a separate general ledger account ( here the posting key UPF will be used to determine the g/l account ).
Thanks and Regards

Error Acquisition value negative in area 15. Message no. AA617

Hi all,
I have capitalized an AUC but after capitalization only i came to know that it has been over valued for 2000 BHD now i want to reverse that 2000 BHD which is over capitalized , i tried doing this in f-02 with transaction type 101 and i am getting the below error
Acquisition value negative in area 15.
Message no. AA617
Asset affected: 000000400012-0000
I have to pass the following entry
Debit Vendor
Credit Asset
is the way i have done is correct if not please guide me in this issue
Thanks In advance
Vinu

Hi Paul,
Now am getting below error when i tried pk 75 and tran type 100
Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01
Message no. AA629
Asset affected: 000000100031-0000
Diagnosis
With the transaction entered, the balance for the transactions in group 10 in area 01 will be negative in this fiscal year. However, the balance of transaction type group 10, according to its definition, must be positive in each fiscal year.
System Response
The system rejects this posting.
Procedure
Check the transaction type, the amount and the fiscal year in your posting. If you want to post a credit memo to an acquisition from the previous year, then use a transaction type for a retirement. If necessary, you can change balance rules after talking with your SAP consultant.
Please help me for the above issue.
thanks & regards
VINU

Acqusition value negative in area 01

Hi All,
I'm settling inestment order but I get the erro message "Acqusition value negative in area 01",
Please assist how to solve it.

Hi
Please activate the "Negative values allowed" feild in the depreciation
area tab. You can do this by going to transaction code AS02. Double
click on the depreciation area 01 and then activate the "Negative
values feild".
By doing you can resolve your issue. There is no other way apart from
this option to resolve the issue.
The reason why we are asking you to have this feild activated because,
your configuration does not allow negative values into the asset.
If this is a AUC asset, I do not see any issue in having the feild
activated as this asset is a cost collector and will not have any issues
even if you allow negative values.
It is recommended that asset under constructions allow negative
values. The system can run into a temporary 'negative values' situation
during the calculation at time of a settlement.
In general for AuC you must allow negative values always.
See also SAP note 141656 where you can see how this can be done.
You find further information on the topic in SAP note 19048 which
says in under 'Solution':
"Generally, negative values should always be allowed for assets under
construction. You should therefore make this setting at asset class
level (Transaction OAYZ).
In the asset class of the AuCs in all depreciation areas, set the
'Negative values allowed' indicator (ANLB-XNEGA). Note that this change
only takes effect for fixed assets that are created after the indicator
is set. For existing fixed assets, set this indicator in the detail
screen of the depreciation areas in the asset master (Transaction AS02).
You may have to adjust the screen layout rule to do so.
Make this setting in AS02 for relevant individual assets.
Before you set the 'Negative values allowed' indicator, consider the
related Note 141656."
Best Regards,
Blaz

Condition for AED maintained in Migo but not showing while doing miro

Dear Experts.
Please suggest,
In PO AED conditon JMOP is not maintained, but it is maintained in the MIGO, and hence does not reflect while doing MIRO.
How can this be rectified to pass the proper entry at the time miro.
Regards,
Charmaine

Hi,
Check the difference of condition types you maintained in Excise defualts place.
SPRO>Logistics general >>Tax on Goods Movements>>India>>basic settings >> Detrmination of Excise duty>>Mainatin Excise defalts..
I think you missed the A/P AT1 cond type maintained in Excise defaults.
Check the scenario as per my [revous mail , that is Excise is coming or not at the time of Excise capure.
Regards,
Andra

While doing MIRO Tcode system is very slow

hi experts,
       i am facing big problem, while doing MIRO transaction first screen it is fast after entering the P.O number then system will slow down for loading P.O line items, even scrolling or shifting to one tab strip to another tab strip also it's taking lot of time.
                   2 or 3 line items it was fast. if line items is more than 10 the system will goes slow. so plz anybody tell me the reason. And what i have to do.
   what could be the reason for problem .(There is no abap code involved) PLZ ...
                                   i am waiting for reply.
                                                             Murali Papana.

Hi Murali,
   Try to create index for the tables: BKPF, MSEG AND RBKP.
The fields involved for MSEG: lfbja, lfbnr and lfpos.
                               BSIP: bldat and xblnr.
                               RBKP: lifnr, ivtyp, repart and rbstat.
Try these and pls let me know the status if improved.
Regards,
Aditya.

Document number 1000 100000017 2010 was already assigned while doing MIRO

HI All,
I have an issue regarding number range, while doing MIRO for third party purchase order it is saying "Document number 1000 100000017 2010 was already assigned"
my process is:
Created Sales Order, PR created automatically, converted PR to PO, done statistical GR, Billing done based on sales order ( billing document 100000017)
message no: F5152
Please let me know if somebudy get the same message and resolved it.
Thanks in advance
Nagesh

hello,
Go to SE16 and check tabl;e BKPF, enter thsi number in teh REF. document number field,
Else go to FBN1 and see the current number for the company code

Acquistion value negative in area 01 while doing MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for