Acrobat/Reader cannot cope with internal Webserver connectivity problems, leading to comments being hidden/deleted. Any thoughts?

Adobe Acrobat/Reader do not cope with interruptions to access to the internal WebServer hosting the PDF/XML review files.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
Connection is lost to the WebServer hosting the PDF review files.
After connection to the WebServer is regained, access to the PDF review files is blocked by Adobe Acrobat/Reader.
Sometimes this can be resolved by deleting the entire contents of the folder:
          C:\Users\<user-name>\AppData\LocalLow\Adobe\Acrobat\11.0\Synchronizer
NOTES:
We have experienced this behaviour especially when connecting to the WebServer via VPN. I reckon the connectivity issues could be initially our problem, that Acrobat/Reader simply do not handle.
Clearing the contents of the Synchronizer folder does not always work.
Team members have also seen situations where significant numbers of review comments or status values have been not been displayed, but exist in the XML review files. In some cases comments/status values have been automatically deleted without warning from the Adobe review XML files.
PDF reviews are sent out via email as links to the PDF review file hosted on an internal WebServer.
Writers and reviewers in the team either have either:
Acrobat XI Pro 11.0.08 with Reader 11.0.08
Acrobat XI Pro 9.5.5 with Reader 11.0.08
I have personally experienced the above behaviour with Acrobat XI Pro 11.0.08 and Reader 11.0.08.
Could this experience be connected the Synchronizer (http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/known-issues-acrobat-xi-reader.html )?
For example, where a reviewer uses a different version of Acrobat/Reader?
Could anyone please provide a list of compatible versions of Acrobat/Reader?
Expected results:
Adobe Acrobat/Reader should really handle connection issues with a warning and later check for recovered connections.
However, what appears to be happening is that Acrobat/Reader writes some sort of blocking code to the Synchronizer folder that prevents future checks of the PDF review files on the review WebServer.
As far as I understand, the connection issues are not caused by Adobe software, however the problems we are experiencing relate to how Adobe Acrobat/Reader handle this loss of connection.
Plea for Help!
I have checked and the experience of missing comments and persistent "connectivity issues" seems to be a reported but sadly outstanding issue...
This has been an ongoing headache for some time, so solutions would be great, but any thoughts or suggestions are welcome...?
     For example, has anyone using SharePoint to host PDF reviews experienced anything similar?
Many thanks!

Adobe Acrobat 11.0.09 with Microsoft SharePoint Repository Trial Update
We've completed week one of a three week trial (see above) that will go on until Friday 24th October.
We currently have just four PDF files out for review that make use of the SharePoint repository.
To-date:
Each review file has had multiple concurrent reviewers posting comments over several days from both over the office LAN and also via VPN when working remotely.
Dynamic stamps seem to be working as hoped and are all visible.
We have not experienced any connection-type issues and the we have not had reason to clear out the Synchronizer folder as described above.
Counter balance:
I have experienced the situation with a remote VPN connection, where Adobe Acrobat could not connect to our internal WebServer repository. At the same time, I was able to connect to PDF review files hosted in SharePoint.
Summary:
The experience so far does suggest that problems are caused by the an inconsistent connection to the WebServer repository (especially over VPN) combined with Adobe Acrobat/Reader's inability to cope with the resulting situation.
At the moment I must say that while it is early days, I am hopeful that the combination of SharePoint as the repository and the update to Adobe Acrobat/Reader 11.0.09 will continue to prove to be reliable.
I'll provide an update to this post on Friday 24th October...
Here's hoping!

Similar Messages

  • TS1559 my wifi is grayed out... No one can fixed it...there is a problem with hardware. IC problem inside the phone. Apple have any facility like service after sales etc. Multi billion company but no priority for customers ?

    my wifi is grayed out... No one can fixed it...there is a problem with hardware. IC problem inside the phone. Apple have any facility like service after sales etc. Multi billion company but no priority for customers ? Just try to look at google search you can find lot of people who have same problem with iphone 4s. It is surly manufacturing default. Is that apple reputation lounching New virsion Iphone with diffective hardware.

    Plz dont give me idea setting>reset>reset network configration .... I already did it..... give me proper solution... who can replace default hardware from my iphone?????????????????????

  • Acrobat Reader 9.5.1 'Internal Error' [solved]

    Hello, everybody.
    To come quickly to the point, here is the problem / issue (hopefully, in the most concise and useful formulation).
    OS: openSUSE Linux 12.1 with kernel v. 3.1.10-1.9 and (just for the report - even if I don't think it matters) Qt libraries v. 4.7.4-19.6.1. I say I don't think it matters, because I've already experienced this very same issue with openSUSE 11.0 (kernel 2.6.25.5 and Qt 4.4.0, with Acrobat Reader 8.1.3).
    Acrobat Reader v. 9.5.1 (the release included with the distro).
    The issue: when I try to overwrite an existing PDF document (i.e.: save 'foo.pdf' OVER a pre-existing copy of 'foo.pdf') I systematically get caught into the sequence 'the document already exists. Do you want to overwrite it?' -> yes -> 'An internal error has occurred' -> the document can't be overwritten.
    Attempts to fix: I've already tried - suspecting I had possibly missed something during the installation process - to change the permissions of the '.adobe' preferences folder under my /home directory by issuing the usual 'chown -R xxx:yyy .adobe' command: with no result.
    Any idea about the possible causes and workarounds?
    BTW, while I was trying to recover the exact information about the program's version in the 'Help -> about Adobe Reader' menu, I've stumbled into another issue (which looks very much like a bug): that is, the program freezes if I try to read the 'Credits' information by pushing the suitable button in the red 'Adobe Reader 9' banner. Possible causes and remedies (aside from upgrading to the most recent version)?
    Thank you very much in advance
    Mario Grilli
    Message was edited by: jaygrey
    Reason: solved

    I add this one to my previous message, which solves the issue (and closes the thread).
    The issue has been solved (on another system, though: that is, Fedora 17) by installing the original Acrobat Reader 9.5.1 from Adobe. With "original" I mean: not the .rpm archive enclosed in the OS DVD, but the one which can be downloaded directly from Adobe.
    The method:  one has to open a terminal and simply do the following:
    # rpm -Uvh http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/adobe-release/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
    [as root] # yum install AdobeReader_enu
    The version of Acrobat Reader which is installed by this method is complete with all the GTK suitable libraries: and actually works with no hassle, allowing to overwrite previous versions of the same file.
    Now, however, I have to find some equivalent procedure under openSUSE: because it's a fact that even the AdbeRdr9.5.1-1_i486linux_enu.rpm file one usually downloads from here installs a copy of Acrobat Reader which shows the aforementioned issue, despite all the necessary graphical libraries being already installed in the system. Now, since this one is probably the .rpm archive a user finds in the main .rpm-based Linux distros, I add that it might be interesting if some Adobe engineer would try to dig a little deeper into this issue...

  • Acrobat Reader cannot be installed???  Version 4-9

    Hi, can anybody help me? My son messed with the registry in XP Pro SP3 and deleted my Acrobat Reader. I tried to reinstall it using everything I read but no luck. Here are the two Errors I get:
    Error 1401.Could not create key \.fdf\AcroExch.FDFDoc\ShellNew. System error
    and
    Error 1402.Could not open key: UNKNOWN\.fdf. System error 5
    I checked and made sure the reg-key had full permission etc. NO LUCK.
    What did my son delete??? Can I recreate the proper Registry Key or Keys?
    Thank you, I need Help, cannot read any .pdf files anymore????????
    JJ

    thanx to U both, here the status trying cleaning!!!
    Run-time error '-2147024882 (8007000e)':
    System Error &H80004005 (-2147467259). Unspecified error
    -I just don't know what my kid deleted?-
    I ran the cleaner anyway and after two try's two Adobe setup entries where deleted. BUT trying to install, I now get these Errors:
    Error 1401.Could not create key
    \.xfdf\AcroExch.XFDFDoc\ShellNew
    Error 1402.Could not open key: UNKNOWN\.xfdf.
    Help Please
    and thanxs for trying graffiti and Pat, I'll try it all!
    HELP
    HELP PLEASE THANX

  • Acrobat Reader cannot open e-mail program

    Hello,
    I´ve a little problem with the Acrobat reader. After installing on our new computer (Windows 7) the reader cannot find our e-mail program (Windows Live Mail). Can anyone say me where the problem is?
    Regards
    Chris

    Post your question in the forum for Adobe Reader.

  • SLS as Router: Trouble with internal hosts connecting to external IP.

    I was hijacking [http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=12200257] long enough, so I'm moving this to my own question.
    Setup: SLS 10.6.4 on Mac Mini(2010).
    GigE en2 is connected to an internal network (hereafter 'lan')
    USB Ethernet en0 (MacBookAir adapter) is connected to the external network (hereafter 'WAN').
    Server has Two IP addresses, 'lan.lan.lan.2' and 'WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN'. Default route for server is 'WAN.WAN.WAN.GW'.
    Server is serving NAT, DHCP, Firewall
    Internal clients (such as 'lan.lan.lan.lan') trying to connect to 'WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN' (any port, any service) take about 13 SECONDS before they receive a reply.
    External clients connecting to the WAN IP get served right away. ("The cobbler's children go barefoot").
    Internal clients connecting to the internal IP (lan.lan.lan.2) are connected right away, also.
    If I run 'route monitor' on the server during the 13 second connection, I see this:
    bash-3.2# route monitor -n
    got message of size 124 on Wed Sep 1 21:21:16 2010
    RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 124, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, ifscope 0, flags:<UP,GATEWAY,HOST,DONE,WASCLONED,IFSCOPE>
    locks: inits:
    sockaddrs: <DST,GATEWAY>
    lan.lan.lan.lan WAN.WAN.WAN.GW
    Yes, it would be a losing route to try to reply out the WAN.WAN.WAN.GW for the internal address!
    Furthermore, "traceroute -s WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN lan.lan.lan.lan" shows a route going OUT which of course fails.
    Traceroutes of the LAN and WAN port on the server, show indeed that for the first several seconds, (until the RTM_LOSING message appears) the server tries to reply out the WAN port.
    I've tried all sorts of static routes… to no avail
    One odd thing: Why is the RTM_LOSING route IFSCOPEd to the external interface?
    Any help is appreciated.
    Yes, I'm definitely considering using a hardware router instead. But I'm really trying to avoid that- trying to save on space, power, heat here. The Mac is really a great box… If I can only get this fixed.
    Thanks in advance to anyone who looks at this.
    packet trace below: combined lan and [WAN] trace
    Client on "lan.lan.lan.lan" port 50592
    trying to connect to external IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80
    [WAN] indicates replies sent out on the WAN port!
    Note: also uploaded this to [http://pastebin.com/7hjfGUKH]
    17:59:40.368696 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [S], seq 3990700560, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,TS val 649354945 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:40.368977 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [S.], seq 702390106, ack 3990700561, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 2,nop,nop,TS val 899983692 ecr 649354945,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:40.912337 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [S.], seq 702390106, ack 3990700561, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 2,nop,nop,TS val 899983697 ecr 649354945,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:41.319955 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [S], seq 3990700560, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,TS val 649354954 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:41.320185 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983702 ecr 649354954], length 0
    17:59:41.513346 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [S.], seq 702390106, ack 3990700561, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 2,nop,nop,TS val 899983703 ecr 649354954,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:42.321320 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [S], seq 3990700560, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,TS val 649354964 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:42.321546 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983712 ecr 649354964], length 0
    17:59:43.322294 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [S], seq 3990700560, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,TS val 649354974 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:43.322464 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983722 ecr 649354974], length 0
    17:59:44.323703 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [S], seq 3990700560, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,TS val 649354984 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:44.323931 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983732 ecr 649354984], length 0
    17:59:45.325059 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [S], seq 3990700560, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,TS val 649354994 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:45.325235 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983742 ecr 649354994], length 0
    17:59:45.521364 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [S.], seq 702390106, ack 3990700561, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 2,nop,nop,TS val 899983743 ecr 649354994,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:47.327098 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [S], seq 3990700560, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,TS val 649355014 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:47.327279 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983762 ecr 649355014], length 0
    17:59:51.330558 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [S], seq 3990700560, win 65535, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:51.330772 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: [WAN] Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983801 ecr 649355014], length 0
    17:59:53.537006 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: Flags [S.], seq 702390106, ack 3990700561, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 2,nop,nop,TS val 899983823 ecr 649355014,sackOK,eol], length 0
    17:59:53.538328 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, length 0
    17:59:53.538420 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: Flags [.], ack 1, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983824 ecr 649355014], length 0
    17:59:53.556404 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [P.], seq 1:164, ack 1, win 65535, length 163
    17:59:53.556490 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: Flags [.], ack 164, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983824 ecr 649355014], length 0
    17:59:53.576007 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: Flags [.], seq 1:1449, ack 164, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983824 ecr 649355014], length 1448
    17:59:53.631457 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [.], ack 1449, win 65535, length 0
    17:59:53.631541 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: Flags [P.], seq 1449:1527, ack 164, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983824 ecr 649355014], length 78
    17:59:53.632619 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [.], ack 1527, win 65535, length 0
    17:59:53.656753 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [F.], seq 164, ack 1527, win 65535, length 0
    17:59:53.656840 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: Flags [.], ack 165, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983825 ecr 649355014], length 0
    17:59:53.656920 IP WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80 > lan.lan.lan.lan.50592: Flags [F.], seq 1527, ack 165, win 65535, options [nop,nop,TS val 899983825 ecr 649355014], length 0
    17:59:53.658263 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [.], ack 1527, win 65535, length 0
    17:59:53.658383 IP lan.lan.lan.lan.50592 > WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN.80: Flags [.], ack 1528, win 65535, length 0
    Message was edited by: the bee

    Thank you for replying… ( +No, that's not the sound of desperation in my keystrokes…+ )
    Anthony Bugera wrote:
    First I created the file sysctl.conf (copy of sysctl.conf.default) in the /etc directory and added the following line:
    net.inet.ip.scopedroute=0
    I thought that's basically what I did, from the command line, but…
    Second I installed Applejack 1.6, booted the server in single user mode, and issued the following command:
    applejack auto restart
    I wasn't sure what the purpose of AppleJack <http://applejack.sourceforge.net/> was here, but reading on…
    Everything has been stable for over 3 hours. I did the scopedroute change with the conf file and rebooted because other people in other discussions have had limited success modifying the setting while the server was running (without *clearing the caches, aka applejack*, and rebooting).
    Aha! There's probably a simple command line way to do this while running… somewhere… But, I'm willing to try it. I've already made the Mac our site's perimeter router, and I'm not quite ready to switch to a separate hardware router as the shiny new Mini ought to work.
    But, some sort of cache being out of date, is a plausible reason for it "only working for a little while".
    On the plus side, I'm getting a great TCP/IP re-education in the meanwhile.

  • How do I get Acrobat Reader to work with Firefox again? I'ver tried everything that I can find in the Help area.

    A while back now I lost use of Acrobat Reader's loading feature while in Firefox. I have tried all of the suggestions that I can find in the Help Menu, on blogs, etcetera, and nothing has worked to re-enable it. The Acrobat Reader seems to work fine from all other browsers, and from the Start Menu. I just can't get it to work with Mozilla.

    I solved this problem by looking at the plug-ins I had in 5.0 and found that I had two versions of Adobe - a V8 and a V10 enabled. I disabled the V8 and it all works fine now.

  • Acrobat Reader DC - Bug with Dialog Boxes Containing Images?

    Hi all -
    Been testing Reader DC.  Only took a couple of minutes to adjust to the new interface; pretty slick and intuitive.
    Noticed a potential issue that I wanted to warn/share/prob solve with the community.
    I was putting Reader DC through it's paces with a XFA PDF that has some dialog boxes, some of which even had images in them.  (Thanks again to BR001.)
    The dialog boxes with images look great on Acrobat & Reader 9/10/11 (WIN & MAC) - images are clear; no pixelation.
    Reader DC on MAC appears to be fine - resolution looks the same.
    But Reader DC on WIN - the images are now pixelated. Especially around the edges, characters/numbers, etc.  You can tell something is "off" with the image.
    A few simple side-by-side tests can be seen at links below.  Reader DC is on left; Acrobat 9 (9.5.5) is on right.
    Green smiley face: Dropbox - icon differences.PNG (83 x 83)
    Lightroom image: Dropbox - Lightroom Image - Comparison Test.PNG (225 x 132)
    Reader DC banner image: Dropbox - Reader DC Banner--- Comparison test.PNG  *MOST VISIBLE ON THIS EXAMPLE (ironically) (422 x 45)
    Simple banner with words image: Dropbox - Simple Banner - comparison test.PNG (342 x 100)
    PDF containing the 4 buttons that triggered these dialog boxes: Dropbox - Dialog Boxes with Images - PDF - LC community.pdf
    Bug in Reader DC for Windows? Not sure what else the cause could be...
    Anyone having their dialog boxes with images open in Reader DC for Windows WITHOUT the pixelation?
    FYI/thoughts/ideas/suggestions/confirmations?  Hmmm.....
    Brian

    Little easier; picture's worth a thousand; etc.
    Shortcuts to zoom in/out further for most web browsers: ("ctrl" & "+") or ("ctrl" & "-");

  • Install stops. Log reads "Idle 40min with 1 open connection"

    OK, I've tried this nearly a dozen different times and ways. Install begins normally and shortly after "calculating time remaining" changes to an actual time, the installation stops. The Installer is still running, but no progress occurs. The log file shows "localhost installdb [414]: idle 10min with 1 open connection"
    The [414] number changes during different attempts, and every 10 minutes a new entry occurs. "idle 20min, idle 30min, idle 40min", etc. It goes on like this for hours until I quit/restart the Installer.
    Now for the basics: Titanium PB running updated version of Tiger. 1Gig of RAM ... original Apple, installed at the factory. No peripherals attached. Have tried upgrade, archive and install, and erase and install.
    I have also tried to install just the required files (no languages, printer drivers, or x11). I have run disk first aid, and there are no problems on my drive.
    The DVD has been checked at the start of several (but not all) of the install attempts and all have passed.
    The only thing that might be different/unusual about my computer is that I replaced my optical drive (original combo drive) with a new dual-layer dvd combo drive. But it was guaranteed to be Apple-certified. It's model MATSHITA DVD-RAM UJ-85JS.
    Tomorrow I'll try to install using it in target-disk mode, but in the meantime, I thought I'd see if anybody else has any other ideas.
    Thanks.

    I suspect the drive, but you might see if the DVD is dirty or has a thin oily film on it. Some have had this problem, and cleaning it made it work.

  • Acrobat Reader DC: Open with right pane closed?

    Is there a preference so that Acrobat Reader DC will open a PDF with the right pane closed (for desktop, either Windows or OSX)?

    It is very much annoying that this side pane shows up every time I open a document. It is also the reason I am currently thinking of switching to another PDF reader, so I would like to see how Adobe is coming to their senses and give us an option to disable it.

  • Can't get acrobat reader to install with firefox

    this is probably in the wrong topic, but i'm having a **** of a time trying to print a single page of a 60 page pdf doc. i'm using PREVIEW but it gives me no option to print current page. i have an older hp deskjet and downloaded mac driver for it.
    then i tried to get acrobat reader, but can't get the installer to work because of firefox i guess.
    btw........i've only been with mac for a couple of months......

    avid3d wrote:
    this is probably in the wrong topic, but i'm having a **** of a time trying to print a single page of a 60 page pdf doc.
    Print (⌘-p), then click on the big blue arrow to expand the window, There, you will find "Pages" and you can choose. Then, click on PDF at the bottom left and choose "Save as PDF"
    -mj
    [email protected]

  • Problem installing Acrobat Reader on Mac with Mavericks (with error)

    I tried ALL the ways to install Acrobat Reader on my Macbook with Mavericks, nothing worked!
    It says "Error 301" or something like that and I already tried to download the enterprise version, the offline version, to change the login settings of my macbook. Nothing works...
    All started when, at a certain point, I don't know why, it stopped working opening pdf files, saying "error, the file could be damaged or you need an updated version of Adobe Acrobat Reader", so I uninstalled the app and tried to install again. It was when I realized that the mission was harder than  I thought!
    Please, if anybody with the same problem solved it yet, please please share it with me!
    Thank you!

    I'm sorry, part of it is in portuguese!
    How can I post here the install.log file?
    Thank you so much!
    PS: Apparently the error now is different, with no number ..

  • Acrobat Reader X integration with SharePoint 2010

    I recently upgraded from Acrobat Pro 9.x to Acrobat Reader X (10.1.2) to test out the new SharePoint integration features. Per the Enterprise Admin Guide, I added the line to my DocIcon.xml file to handle the ".pdf" extension, added the PDF icon to my server, verified that the WebDAV module wasn't present in IIS, and then restarted my SharePoint server.
    When I click on a PDF document from a SharePoint document library, however, I receive an error message that reads, "There was an error opening this document. The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect."
    Some things I have already tried to remedy the problem:
    I have full rights to the SharePoint Server and the document library in question.
    I verified that the WebClient Windows service is running locally on my machine.
    Clicking on "Edit Document" from the document library's item context menu produces the same error message.
    What am I missing?
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    Jeff,
    Have a look at this Microsoft Technet Forum:  http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointgeneral/thread/49aed23c-cf9c-43 39-8c17-ff1df65649a6/
    It basically says to apply two KB updates to the server.
    Software Update for Web Folders (KB907306)
    http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=15123
    Description of the 2007 Office post-Service Pack 1 hotfix package: February 6, 2008
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943337/en-us
    Give the information provided above it's due diligence and then make a decision on whether or not they apply to your configuration.

  • Acrobat Reader Error ...There was a problem reading this document(107)...

    I created several PDF files from within stored procedure using oracle's PL/PDF package and I email the files, as an attachment, to myself. When I attempt to open a file with a size greater than 100k, I receive an error message of 'There was a problem reading this document(107)'. When I click on ctrl-OK I get 'Error reading xrefx entry' error message. However, if the file size is < 100k, it opens fine. I am using Acrobat Reader version 5.1.0.
    Does anyone know the solution to this?

    I created several PDF files from within stored procedure using oracle's PL/PDF package and I email the files, as an attachment, to myself. When I attempt to open a file with a size greater than 100k, I receive an error message of 'There was a problem reading this document(107)'. When I click on ctrl-OK I get 'Error reading xrefx entry' error message. However, if the file size is < 100k, it opens fine. I am using Acrobat Reader version 5.1.0.
    Does anyone know the solution to this?

  • APPLE PLEASE FIX THE ISSUE WITH ITUNES STORE CONNECTION PROBLEM..PLEASE..

    Allot of people are having major problems both Mac and Windows users..cant connect or major Lagging problems..

    Allot of people are having major problems both Mac
    and Windows users..cant connect or major Lagging
    problems..
    Have you tried contacting your ISP to see if they can talk you through a trace from your computer to phobos.apple.com?
    Some people with AOL were having problems and it turned out that their tracelog revealed connectivity issues.
    You say that a lot of people are having problems but I'm not having any problems up here in Canada connecting and I had no problem yesterday or on friday. I have had problems in the past but I assume that it was network issues on the ISP side since I had problems connecting to some other sites as well.

Maybe you are looking for