Acrobat vs Livecyle - which is better for making accessible PDF's

I am having a very hard time making my PDF accessible. The source program I use to create my document is InDesign 5.5. I convert to PDF and am attempting to tag it using Acrobat X. I tried tagging my form using the articles panel in InDesign but it doesnt convert to PDF properly (which i learned at this forum is a system glitch). Someone at work suggesting using LiveCycle but I am not familiar with LiveCycle at all. I thougt it was an add-on extension to Acrobat so I'm confused why someone would tell me to use LiveCycle instead of Acrobat X. Can someone please clarify for me what the diff is between Acrobat and Livecyle. I need to make my document accessible by the end of the week and having a lot of problems doing it but i want to make sure that Acrobat is the best adobe product to use before going any further.
Any help is GREATLY appreciated!

Hi miss forms,
I'm out of the country just now and "on-line" time is occasional. However, here are some observations for your consideration.
All this may sound daunting. It is not (honest). Think of it as becoming a competent cook.
Some study. Some practice then it is Rachael Ray time.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Here's a short take:
Use InD CS 5.5 to master the underlying "form text".
Master content with accessible PDF in mind.
Example - if any "headings" are to be used then use InD built-in paragraph tags.
Output the tagged PDF.
Walk the structure tree. Perform requisite post-processing activities.
Goal is to acquire that well-formed tagged PDF.
Next, build the form fields.
Properly fold these into the structure tree.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Observations:
"... but i want to make sure that Acrobat is the best adobe product to use before going any further."
Currently and for the foreseeable future - if you must provide accessible PDF as a deliverable you must have Acrobat Pro.
You want the most current version and you want to keep it updated.
Currently there is no such thing as an accessible PDF that does not require post-processing by a knowledgeable "warm-body".
As the 'warm-body' you perform the essential V&V prior to release of the deliverable.
While there are tools to help with they still do not replace the 'warm-body'.
"I need to make my document accessible by the end of the week ..."
This could be problematic. Unless you are all ready well versed in what a well-formed tagged PDF is and how to stage it in the authoring file I suspect that you won't have a proper deliverable by 30 November.
Using InD CS 5.5 is 'good' but it is not (as you've discovered) adequately robust for well-formed tagged PDF output compared to the current release.
The output PDF needs manual remediation (only possible with Acrobat Pro).
As to any current authoring application used -
Whatever is used it needs to provide robust "tag management".
Currently the first string consists of:
Adobe FrameMaker,
Adobe InDesign,
(n.b., Adobe has invested significant resources in improving mastering content for accessible PDF and output of tagged PDF InDesign versions released since CS5.5. So, if InD is your requisite authoring application I'd recommend you move into the current release.)
MS Word 2010.
When using MS Word 2010 one can use the MS Save As PDF - XPS configured to provide accessible PDF or use
PDFMaker.
For Word 2010 you'd need at least Acrobat X in order to have a compatible PDFMaker.
Some other applications are also providing for authoring / tagged PDF output (such as Open Office).
Regardless of the authoring application used Acrobat Pro is still need for requisite post-processing (structure tree V&V, cleanup, etc).
What form "type" to use?
I'd recommend Acrobat forms rather than XFA forms.
Accessible XFA forms are possible.
But, As George said - a non-trivial learning curve for the basics. Then comes the learning / practice to develop the accessible XFA form.
If you go with XFA I suggest obtaining the XFA spec that Adobe provides.
Considering the improvements Adobe has made in Acrobat XI for Acrobat forms I'd recommend you use that.
However, if you have an older version you can still get there from here (using Acrobat Pro).
"Tools" considerations:
Common Look PDF - An enterprise level tool.
A plug-in for Acrobat.
Common Look Office Pro
(Pro supports PDF forms (Acrobat forms - not XFA forms)
An add-in / plug-in for MS Office 2007/2010.
Used with Power Point or Word.
Provides check points on mastered content. You resolve identified issues then use it to output a tagged PDF.
Perfom requisite post-processing with Acrobat Pro.
http://www.commonlook.com/CommonLook-office
MS Word 2010
Provides content mastering "coaching" for output of accessible PDF.
PDF Accessibility Checker
A "validation" tool.
http://www.access-for-all.ch/en/pdf-lab/pdf-accessibility-checker-pac.html
AIIM's PDF/UA, Universal Accessiblity
http://www.aiim.org/Research-and-Publications/Standards/Committees/PDFUA
The "Achieving WCAG 2.0 with PDF/UA" is available.
The Implementation Guides are in the oven.
ISO 14289-1:2012 (ISO standard for PDF/UA)
Available for purchase at ANSI's web store.
ISO 32000-1 (ISO standard for PDF)
Section 14.8 discusses tagged PDF.
Free, ISO approved copy available from Adobe.
http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/pdf/pdfs/PDF32000_200 8.pdf
I've tried to harvest accessible PDF documentation Adobe's provided since Acrobat 5.
Have most of it my "eReference Shelves"; but, that's at home.
What's nice about these documents is that you can harvest activity specific information with confidence that it is an appropriate "reciepe".
If interested in adding these to your "shelves" let me know.
Use this forum's PM feature.
Be well...

Similar Messages

Which is better for your hearing?

Got a pair of Yuin earbuds, and my problem is listening on a windy day. The wind creates a lot of bass rumble, making me turn up the volume. Canal phones sit closer to the eardrums, but would block out the wind so I could keep the volume lower.
Question, from someone with a degree of hearing loss already: which is better for your ears? Earbuds at higher volume or in-ear at lower vol?

I have 60% deafness in the right ear but also suffer tinnitus (loud whooshing sound) due to a RTA, but the left ear has excellent hearing. I have tried earbuds, headphones even a pair that you control the volume for both ears. None up to now have made any difference. On a windy day my left ear just compensates for the right, so I just hear in mono. To hear good sound, at the moment, it's best for me to listen to my ipod inserted into the Bose sound dock at home.

Which is better for doing animation? Flash 4, 5, MX, CS, or others?

Which is better for doing animation? Flash 4, 5, MX, CS, or
others?
I am used to using brush function more conveniently in Flash
4 than the other versions I ve tried. However, Flash 4 doesn't have
pen tool.
Free News Reader
http://put.hk
http://put.hk/reader/forums.macromedia.com/macromedia.flash.html

1Evan2Wing3 wrote:
> Which is better for doing animation? Flash 4, 5, MX, CS,
or others?
>
> I am used to using brush function more conveniently in
Flash 4 than the other versions I ve tried. However, Flash 4
doesn't have pen tool.
all pretty identical tho I would go with cs, just because I
like the GUI much
more than other versions...
Best Regards
Urami
"Never play Leap-Frog with a Unicorn."
<urami>
If you want to mail me - DO NOT LAUGH AT MY ADDRESS
</urami>

Which is better for bulk message scenario in sap xi RFC or Proxy

which is better for bulk message scenario in ( RFC or Proxy ) ?
Edited by: prabhatxi on Aug 6, 2010 4:44 PM

Proxy will alwaays be better option in this case, as it is adapter less framework, and communication happens directly with XI central integration engine. So it is always fast communication and gives good performance.
But still you should consider other factors, you may consider using RFC as well, as sometime we go for RFC/IDOC as this are the standard interfaces already available rather than creating structure...
May be you can share more info on what type/volume data are you planning to send via XI?
Hope this cleart your doubt..
Divyesh

Which is better for servers, Apache or Tomcat?

Which is better for servers, Apache or Tomcat?

For some reason that link I gave you isn't working right now, but it was today, weird. I would get Tomcat simple because sun uses it in its examples and recommends it. Here's sun's link then, it's probably more useful anyway. http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/

Which is better for newbies?

Which is better for newbies, Jgrasp or Netbeans? I need something that explains errors more thoroughly than Jgrasp.

Here's my code with 3 errors. Now bear in mind that my program has compiled completely and ran correctly up to this method. All I'm trying to do with this method is get the average of all grades in a multi-array. I researched and found some code that was similar to what I needed to do but it's not working out yet. All other methods in my program work perfectly but I can't get this one to compile.
public double getMean(int allGrades[][])
          int total = 0;
          for (int grade : allGrades)
          total += grade;
     System.out.println("Total is "+getMean(grades));
          return total/allGrades.length;
} // end class GradeBookGradebook.java:100: illegal start of type
          return total/allGrades.length;
          ^
Gradebook.java:100: <identifier> expected
          return total/allGrades.length;
          ^
Gradebook.java:100: <identifier> expected
          return total/allGrades.length;
          ^
3 errors

Which is better for music production: macbook air or pro?

Which is better for music production: macbook air or pro?

The MacBook Pro has higher specifications, depending
on the model, and then CTO additional upgrades.
The Air does not have a Retina display, but has lesser
specs, so that may make a difference. They still offer a
low-end MB/Pro w/ optical drive, w/o Retina; specs vary;
it may work in your instance. You'd have 14 days to take
a new Apple computer back, so keep that in mind.
Good luck!

Which is better for gamming, Macbook Pro 13'' or Macbook Pro 13'' Retina?

Which is better for gamming, Macbook Pro 13'' or Macbook Pro 13'' Retina?

LowLuster wrote:
You are certainly welcome to your opinion. I'll stick to my reply.
In view of the fact that there are numerous applications that run properly while creating a lot of internal heat in a MBP indicates that it does not follow that heat is an inhibiting factor (within designed parameters). Thus my comment is certainly not opion, rather fact. You certainly are entitled to your reply but a third party reader should be be apprised of what the facts are.
Ciao.

Which is better for outdoor music bluetooth or airplay speakers?

which is better for outdoor music listening airplay speakers or bluetooth, cost, etc.?

The MacBook Pro has higher specifications, depending
on the model, and then CTO additional upgrades.
The Air does not have a Retina display, but has lesser
specs, so that may make a difference. They still offer a
low-end MB/Pro w/ optical drive, w/o Retina; specs vary;
it may work in your instance. You'd have 14 days to take
a new Apple computer back, so keep that in mind.
Good luck!

Which is better for physical therapy graduate student, a MacBook air or MacBook pro?

Which is better for a physical therapy graduate student, a MacBook air or MacBook pro?

Macbook Air
I cannot see you using strenuous applications to help you with a Physical Therapy Degree.
Have a think of whether you want an 11" or 13".
I'd recommend the 13" because although the 11" is perfect for taking notes in class etc.; when it comes to performing as a desktop and not sitting on your lap, it can seem too small.
The 13" is the best of both worlds. You can keep the portability and the power in one.
Make sure you get a large enough SSD, they always fill up fast with documents and possibly downloaded text books etc.
With the 13" if you decide to create a innovative project or a collection of photos, you can also use more RAM-consuming applications like iPhoto and iMovie, or even Aperture without worrying about freezing.

Which is better for educational purpose ( for attending online classes ) ??

which is better for educational purpose ( for attending online classes ) ?? iPad air 2 or d macbook pro?? what abt iPad pro ?? plz suggest one for me plz

Some educational site are behind the times. At times, they require software that isn't available on the ipad. You should visit an apple store and try the educational site with the ipad. Considering that you have an iMac, I'd lean in the direction of the iPad.
Robert

Which is better for education iPad or Macbook air?

I am a grade 8 student and I walk around quite a bit in school and I would like to know which one is better for me?
Which is better for school, and no I can not get the discount.
Macbook Air or
iPad
If macbook Air which size and specs would you reccomend?
And if iPad which storage option, white or black do you reccomend?
And should I buy the iPad 2 or the new one.

Great question.
Word processing for iOS is fantastic, but not as good for citations and things as on the macbook air, though footnotes will be preserved.
The new textbook options on ipad are compelling. You should find out if any of your school textbooks are on there by searching the itunes store. If so, ipad is your choice.
They are different categories of products. the macbook air is an excellent computer.
But I guess I feel this way -- why don't you buy a desktop for the home. and an ipad for school? If you feel you can get all of your notetaking, paper drafts etc. done on ipad, then you can use mountain lion (coming out this summer) to keep it all in sync when you go home.
I do have to warn you that I tried taking my ipad to work. If you use google docs at all, you may find some limitations sometimes. If you stick within the icloud universe, (pages, keynote, and numbers), you may be mostly happy.

Which is better for gaming and why?

Hi,
I was researching budget gaming laptops(around $1000, INR 55000) and came up with two choices.....
1)HP Pavilion g6z-1d00 Notebook PC
http://shopping2.hp.com/en_US/home-office/-/products/Laptops/HP-Pavilion/A2B39AV?HP-Pavilion-g6z-1d0...
2)HP Envy 14-2130nr Notebook PC
http://shopping2.hp.com/en_US/home-office/-/products/Laptops/HP-ENVY/QE295UA?HP-ENVY-14-2130nr-Noteb...
Could anybody please tell me which is better for gaming (main purpose and best performance)?
The HP Envy looks great but I don't know much about AMD Quad Core.....
Also, is it possible to upgrade the graphics card on the HP Envy ( AMD Radeon 6630 to a better one) via a HP centre?
It seems to run most games quite well, but I need it to be able to play new games for at least 4 years more (college), while not factoring in the costs for any possible graphics card upgrade....
Please help!!

Thanks Huffer _ very useful.
I wasn't aware that there was a heat problem with the i7 processors, my dv8 runs at around 42 to 52 degrees, mind you I don't really put it under much load. I use it to play Blu-ray ISO files on my projector and for photo editing (Adobe CS4), it's an 820QM.
I have also changed the thermal compound to ICDiamond and drilled holes in the speaker cover to improve air flow, that made a difference too.
@ abhishekmaha
Don't take my comment to seriously, although I think it has some truth to it, it was meant to poke a bit of fun at you.
Heat has always been one of the biggest factors when it comes to any computer, designers try to make them thinner, lighter and cheaper and those types don't work for gaming very well. They're OK for the occasional one, but not on a regular basis. I believe that if you game on any machine that was not meant for it, you will not get 4 years out of it _ 2 years.
I wish I could tell you different, but I am not going to lie to you.
Heat basically affects 3 things on a laptop, the solder that holds the components on the motherboard, any mechanical moving parts, eg the hard drive, fan _ and the battery. You can remove the battery to prolong its life when gaming.
Heat breaks down the solder over time and the mother board simply stops working as far as the hard drive, it stops spinning because the tiny bearing(s) in there dry out and seize up.
If you don't want to use a cooling mat then prop up the back of the laptop, hanging it over the edge of the table will expose the fan intake, but will block off other vents.
60 degrees is a bit warm too, 50 is better or rather, the cooler the better. What ever machine you get, make a note of what the temps are when you first boot up and when it's hot. The idea is to get an average so you can judge when it is dangerously getting hot.
P.S. Be sure and give Huffer a kudos too.

Which is better for computer and program... sleep or turn off?

When not using, which is better for the program, sleep or turn off the computer and any explanations are welcome...

I advise shutting down rather than sleep. A good shut down often clears up nascent problems, and of course you're saving electricity by not running your machine and also saving those precious MTBF hours on all the mechanical components. Think of the hours it would sleep vs. the number of hours you actually use the machine. Even though sleep consumes less electricity, it still consumes.

Is it better for your battery if you let it run down all the way and then charge it? Or to charge it whenever you have the opportunity? Which is better for the life of the battery?

I was wondering it the life of the battery would last longer if you let the battery run down all the way and then charge it? Or to charge it whenever you have the opportunity even if it doesn't have a low battery? Which is better for the life of the battery and prolong the life of the battery?

I've had a iPhone 4s since March 2012, and it's battery is pretty useless now. I was using the app Battery Doctor (Battery Saver, Battery Life) by Beijing Kingsoft Internet Security software, which encourages the user to charge more often, whenever battery life drops below 100% full and greater than 20% full, and gives ratings according to the number of full, partial & overcharges done, but I'm concerned that charging like that actually results in worse battery life??
I now have an new iPhone 5 and don't want the battery to only last as short as the last one did
Any advice/comments please

Acrobat vs Livecyle - which is better for making accessible PDF's

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for