AcroPDF.dll User Licence and Allowed Usage

I am developing a VB.Net program, part of its functionality is dispalying a pdf document. I am using the SDK AcroPDF.dll (AcroPDFLib.AxAcroPDF object) which works fine.
Can I distribute the .dll with my VB code for free even if I sell the program for a small fee? I've read the user licence but its not that clear to me re all the legal jargon.
Any comments much appreciated.
Regards,
Albert.

Yes. Once you have the Security dialogue box opened in Safe Mode, as described, you will probably see two vertical lines of six boxes, two boxes shaded and ticked (Read and Execute; and Read). Under Allow, click Full Control at top. It and the two other unshaded, blank boxes under Allow (Modify and Write) will become ticked. Click Apply. Click OK. (Note! When going back to look, I did not of course click Apply then OK, having no need to change the permissions again - so the direction "Click Apply. Click OK" is in fact an assumption on my account, although I can't think what else one might do at that point.)
The below image is what you should see in the first instance:
Hope my contribution here has helped. I was six hours trying to get rid of those files!!

Similar Messages

New to the Apple and I want to set up a user account that will not delete the guest users files and allow and preserve their personal settings after log out. Is this possible?

New to the Apple and I want to set up a user account that will not delete the guest users files and allow and preserve their personal settings after log out. Is this possible?

The built-in guest user account will not do this. Simply create a new standard account and call it "Guest" or "Guest Users" or whatever you like.
Go to System Preferences > Users& Groups, click "+" to make a new account.

License.Limit.Exceeded with 4x150 users licence and only 300 real users

We have 4x150 users licence, set to unlimited bandwith.
We get these messages in event viewer:
Connection rejected by server. Reason : [
License.Limit.Exceeded ] : (_defaultRoot_, _defaultVHost_) : Max
connections allowed exceeds license limit. Rejecting connection to
: our_app_name/.
It appends a lot since the last few days, even before last
update 2.0.3
At the same time, when we check the administration console,
the number in the _defaultVhost is much lowe than 600, the maximum
number of user that is allowed.
Licences are all OK in the administration console.
We have to restart the Flash server service to correct the
problem.
Please help...

Hello mm_Patrick,
Thank you for your interest in this problem.
We restrict multiple access to the same application instance
on our service.
We operate a chat using fms. We experience, from time to
time, an application instance failure which results in the entire
room participants being disconnected. The application instance
however still shows the connections to the room at time of this
failure. The problem starts to compound itself as people try to
access the room ( connect to the application instance ). After the
start of this problem when we look in the admin console the live
log for the application instance does not show any new connection
attempts nor accept or failure to connect but the application
instance registers the connection against the total connect to the
application instance. People are unable to connect to this room. As
they continue to try they increase the connection number registered
for this application instance until the point that the application
instance total connected takes us past our license limit. The
application instance seems to register and collect the connections
even though there is no connection to the application instance. We
then start to see the logging of the license limit exceeded.
Please note that there are no error/warning messages
generated in logs that indicate anything has failed. We can only
determine that a failure once we start to experience the symptoms
described for the application instance.
We have experienced this issue in the past with fcs. It was
not until the last update of fcs that the probem went away.
However, fms 2.0.0 onward has always had this issue for us.
The problem with this issue is that it is difficult to create
and study. We can go 1 hour and crash or we may have success for
over two weeks.
In an attempt to search for a solution to the problem we have
started focussing on this comment in Adobe –TechNote:
http://www.adobe.com/go/d47f06c6
“In Server.xml, find the ResourceLimits node (around
line 181). It contains the Connector node (around line 203). Within
the HTTP node (around line 205), create a new line and insert
MaxConnectionThreads and give it an appropriate value:
<MaxConnectionThreads>20</MaxConnectionThreads>
The default is 10.”
We have found that by adding the change to our HTTP node that
we have lessened the frequency of our problem. Also, we have taken
all remoting away from the time of connection. We now accept all
connections and then do our work after connection.
Another step we have taken to minimize the impact of this
problem is to define the scope as “inst” in the
application.xml. By creating a separate fmscore.exe for each
application instance it gives us the ability to correct a problem
with a faulting application instances without disturbing our entire
server traffic.
Any further insight into this problem would be greatly
appreciated.
Regards,
iGx

Nokia's user interface and software A terrible e...

(hope this is in the right section, here goes)
I got my E63 about a month ago. I thought it only fair to list my grievances with the phone so far, because I am really close to selling it and buying something else, and I think Nokia deserves to know the reasons why, and will hopefully improve in the future.
I will start off with what I love about the phone, because I do in fact, really like it. The slim size, excellent keyboard, great connectivity like 3G and Wi-fi, and the reasonable battery life, make it a great phone, but its in the user interface, and actual usage of the phone, where things really start to fall flat.
The user interface is very disorganized and difficult.
Why is everything so hard to find and use? For example, if I want to change the applications that appear on my home screen, I need to navigate the following directory tree:
Menu > Tools > Settings > General > Personalisation > Mode Settings > Home Screen Applications > Application Shortcuts > Shortcut 1
and then, when I finally get to the list, the items arent even in any order!
You must be joking, what a horrible menu! Its insane. As a user, I feel like its a terrible experience.
But thats not all. Why are there 2 notes applications on my phone? There's notes, and active notes. Why does Nokia OVI store exist twice, once in the main menu, and once under installations? Why do I have Contacts, and OVI contacts on my phone? Why can't my phone have just one app that works well, instead of 2 that differ slightly.
Why is email setup in the installations menu? Why isn't it under email, where mailboxes get set up? Its just sitting there cluttering up Installations, when its something you only use once or twice.
Not to mention the fact that the configuration settings are all over the place, i.e. there is an Email Key setting in Menu > Tools > Settings > General. Its all on its own, not near anything. Why isn't it in the same menu where the other shortcut keys get set? Or even in the email app settings?
I am not naive, I know that the E63 is on the cheaper end of the scale, so I can't expect it to be the fastest phone in the world, but scrolling through my email in HTML mode is so horribly slow, and the view tends to jump from left to right on some emails, I hardly even use the phone to check my email anymore, which is sad because that is the reason I chose the E63.( for the nice keypad and email syncing)
These are just SOME of the things that I have noticed. So please Nokia, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE! Spend some of your R&D money on user interface and user experience!
If there is anything you take away from this letter, let it be this:
Doing anything on the phone just feels like hard work, it makes me not want to use the phone.
Your phones should be simple and easy to use, even without the mass of Help files that appear in a lot of the menus.
I know, some people may say that if I want a better experience, I should be willing to buy a more expensive phone. Well, I can say that if I do spend more money on a phone, the chance is very slim that it will be a Nokia.
Really, I am not being nasty, just trying to be honest. I know that Nokia is run by human beings like myself, so I tried to be polite, and I dont intend to hurt anyones feelings.
I am quite willing to answer any questions you may have. Its a bit of a pipe dream, but I would love to see Nokia release an entirely new version of the phone software, with everything re-organized and re-done. The sad truth is that will probably never happen, and I will end up swopping my E63 for something that is easy and pleasant to use.
So please, let me know if there is anything I can do to change the situation, or help you guys in making this better for everyone.

"If your not used to symbian you'll learn it quick enough, compared to android it's childsplay."
On the contrary, Ive been using Nokia phones for the last 8 years, and for the last 2 years Nokia exclusively, and the UI has just got worse.
The fact that "you'll learn it" is of no comfort. Why should I have to spend hours learning how to use a cellphone? Whenever I want to do something I havent done before, I have to spend time digging through obscure menu options. That is absurd.
"What phone do you have in mind to replace the E63, that would help us users alot more then telling us what is wrong with your phone. Although over all I like my e63."
I don't have any specific phone in mind, Im just going to ask and look around until I find something with an operating system that is organised in a logical manner, and that allows me to access and read my email quickly and easily.
I put this here hoping that other users would come forward with UI related things that they were unhappy about, and then Nokia would take notice. I could easily have just gone out and changed phones, but I chose to do something different.

Need to track if a user printed a doc via builtin AcroPDF.DLL control

I am creating a small application in Visual Studio 2008, using VB.NET.
I am getting a PDF from a webservice, and need to do a couple things:
1.) Show the PDF to the user with all available controls (i.e. Print, Save, Email, Change Size of viewer, etc.).
2.) If the user selects print, I need to know that the user printed the piece so that I can log it to our database with it's 'last printed date'.
I have the retrieval and presenting part all working perfectly using the AcroPDF.dll to tap into the user's Acrobat Reader (latest version) that they have installed on their computer; but can't seem to figure out if there is some way for me to know that the user went into the print dialog from the automatic toolbar that is created and used by the AcroPDF.dll when I use the following command:
AxAcroPDF1.LoadFile(<file name goes here>)
Is there some way for me to intercept some event within the AxAcroPDF1 object so that I can interrogate it an know whether or not the user printed the report?
While I am asking, I will also ask about the Send Email method, is there a way that I can tell if the user clicked on it and went into, and completed, that function?
If there is no default way to tap into the existing infrastructure, is there an easy way for me to 'override' the existing print button so that it calls a function that I create instead of the one it currently does?
I would like to keep the visual aspect like it is, if possible, to keep it as polished as I can.
Thanks,
Jim

lrosenth,
Thanks for the reply! I have only two follow up questions:
1.) What, exact javascript am I supposed to insert into the PDF that will allow me to know if the user printed the document from within my windows based application? I have injected javascript before into a PDF, but for a different reason.
2.) Where, exactly, would I want to inject the javascript into the PDF?
any example javascript code, etc. would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Jim

Add Trusted Sites by GPO and allow the user to edit / add Trusted Sites manually.

Hi All
Greetings for the day....
I have task to add a few Sites in Trust zone, Where I am succeed allowing them by GPO. As user requested to allow him to add Sites to add / edit manually. When I applied the Security Zone : Do not allow user to add sites to disabled , but it not allowing.
IE options greyed out.
Need your valuable expertise.
J D Tech Guy........

Hi,
On local machines, this setting will be grayed out and users can’t change it, if we configured the setting from the following node:
User Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Internet Explorer > Internet Control Panel > Security Page\
Site to Zone Assignment List
However, we can try using GPP Registry to deploy the setting, for this will allow users to change the setting.
Regarding this point, the following two threads can be referred to as reference.
Managing Trusted Sites through Group Policy Preferences
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/5af55e6e-5495-404e-96bf-4183e8358245/managing-trusted-sites-through-group-policy-preferences?forum=winserverGP
Add Trusted Sites via GPO but still allow users to add trusted sites
http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/326140-add-trusted-sites-via-gpo-but-still-allow-users-to-add-trusted-sites
Please Note: Since the second website is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of
this information.
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Display some constant in the input field and allow the user to change it.

Dear All,
I have a requirement in WDA to display inputfield with some constant initially and allow
the user to change that value according to his wish.Currently I am using UI Element
InputField for this,but I am not able to show the constant initially.
How can I achieve this pls suggest.
Thanks,
Reddy.

Hi sudhir,
To display with default values, you need to write your code in wddointi method.
Check this code..
* navigate from <CONTEXT> to <INPUT> via lead selection
lo_nd_input = wd_context->get_child_node( name = wd_this->wdctx_input ).
* get element via lead selection
lo_el_input = lo_nd_input->get_element( ).
lv_ship_point = '1001'.
* set single attribute
lo_el_input->set_attribute(
name = `SHIP_POINT`
value = lv_ship_point ). // Now ship_point have initial value 1001.
Cheers,
Kris.

Is it possible to restrict the user from creating a sibling and allow him to ONLY create child nodes in DRM?

When in a hierarchy, a user right clicks on a node to crate a new node, he has two options
-Child
-Sibling
Is it possible to restrict the user from creating a sibling and allow him to ONLY create child nodes?
Business cases:
1. different level nodes need to have different prefixes.
- Thus, the default prefix property definition uses the level number to assign a prefix
- Also, a validation, to ensure the correct prefix, uses the level number
But if the user can create a child and a sibling then the default prefix will only be right for a single case and not both.
Thanks

If the images are exactly the same size then make sure the layer with the mask
is the active layer and in the other documents go to Select>Load Selection and choose
your document with the layer mask under Source document and under channel choose the layer mask.
After the selection loads press the layer mask icon at the bottom of the layers panel.
MTSTUNER

How to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages for some users and allow the access for some users?

I have a requirement to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages for some of the users and allow the access for some of the users.
I have applied the below code on the web.config file but this modification impacting only on the web application level not on the site collection and sub site level.
<location path="_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx">
    <system.web>
      <authorization>
        <deny users="*" />
      </authorization>
    </system.web>
</location>
<location path="_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx">
    <system.web>
      <authorization>
        <deny users="*" />
      </authorization>
    </system.web>
</location>
When I tried the access on
:<portno>/sites/<scname>/_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx">http://<servername>:<portno>/sites/<scname>/_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx page allowed the access for all users.
Please suggest the possible solution to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages on SharePoint2013.
Thanks
Ramasubbu

You can't do it from OOTB.
_layout folder is accessible to the users if they have read access in any of the site even subsite.
You can modify *.aspx file, add your custom control which will check user.
[custom.development]

Difference between AcroPDF.dll and Acrobat.exe while loading standard and custom plug_ins

Hi,
I want to know the difference of behavior when AcroPDF.dll loading the PDF file in the internet explorer and Acrobat.exe application loading PDF in context of plug_ins developed by Adobe or Custom plug_ins using SDK.
When I am loading PDF within Acrobat.exe all the plug_ins (Standard as well as Custom) loaded successfully and working fine but at the same time if I am loading a document within Internet Explorer, behind the scene internet explorer using AcroPDF.dll which is ActiveX for IE to load PDF and it is trying to load plug_ins (standard and custom) but some how my custom plug_in is destroyed or currpted and it is not working any more.
I want to know how AcroPDF and Acrobat.exe using AcroExch.App class or using any other thing to load plug_ins?
Thanks,
Twinkle

For this level of support, you join our developers/partners program and submit a formal support request.

I get a message "before viewing pdf documents i must launch adobe reader and accept end user licence

I get a message "before viewing documents in this browser you must launch adobe reader and accept the end user licence agreement then quit and relaunch the browser". How do I do this?

Just launch Adobe Reader. Assuming you are on a Mac, all apps are launched from Applications.

Limited-access user permission lockdown mode and allowing anon users to view list items

I'm working on setting up a public-facing SharePoint website that will need to support anonymous user access. I'm using the Enterprise Publishing Portal site collection template, so the Limited-access user permission lockdown mode feature is turned on.
Everything is working great, except allowing users to view a list item. One of the key features I was hoping to leverage was the ability to display custom lists on a web page using a List View web part. Then they could click on an item and see the DispForm.aspx
so the item's content was accessible, including any file attachments.
A real-world example is adding an RSS viewer web part to the home page and allowing anon users to click on one of the events to see the details of it. Currently, in lockdown mode, the users gets an authentication prompt.
I toyed with the idea of turning the lockdown feature off. However, I'm uncertain of the full impact that would have on security. For example, I know it will allow anonymous users to see who created and modified an item, which we don't want exposed to the
public (i.e. our employee names). Seems like opening a can of worms by disabling the lockdown mode...
Any ideas on how to tackle this would be greatly appreciated.

So far, this is the most promising solution I've come across:
http://soerennielsen.wordpress.com/2012/05/29/how-to-make-list-items-visible-to-anonymous-users-in-search

ISE and AD Password Expiration Notification and allow user to change

We are almost ready to go live with ISE for our VPN users.
One last thing that has been asked is, how can we make ISE prompt a user when their AD password is about to expire, and allow them the opportunity to change it at that time?
I know the ASA has the ability if it is authenticating directly against AD, but that functionality goes away with IPN. So what settings are there to prompt users connecting via Anyconnect to the ASA VPN through ISE?
We do not have ISE setup for internal users/systems yet, this is strictly a VPN only setup for now.
Thanks,
Dirk

Since we are using radius protocol so password expiration notification will not occur. The user will be prompted when password would expire. With ldap over ssl, user will be notified that "your password will be expired in x number of days" but we can't pick that method as it shoud be ASA integrated directly with AD/LDAP.
Since we have ISE in between acting as a radius server so we have to live with the option where user will not be notified but password can be changed by end-user.
Procedure for Configuring RADIUS Password Management
Requires tha tthe Radius server/ISE be integrated with an Active Directory MS-AD server.
1. Enable "password-management" in tunnel-group/Connection Profile.
Note: "password-management password-expire-in-days X" will not work, use just "password-management"
2. Ensure that MSCHAPv1/MSCHAPv2 is enabled on the RADIUS/ISE server.
Jatin Katyal
- Do rate helpful posts -

How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and user should not allow to multiple browser sessions ?

Dear All,
How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and end user should not allow to multiple browser sessions in portal.Where we need to configure the settings or any code in masthead or any other component. My server version is 7.4 - SP5 .Please help us.
Thanks for advance,
BR,
Durga Rao.

Dear all,
i am able to logoff the click refresh button on keyboard.I am using this code to log off the user into the portal.
document.onkeydown = function(e)
var key;
if (window.event) key = event.keyCode
else
var unicode = e.keyCode ? e.keyCode : e.charCode
key = unicode
switch (key)
{ //event.keyCode
case 116: //F5 button
LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
event.returnValue = false;
key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
return false;
case 82: //R button
if (event.ctrlKey)
LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
event.returnValue = false;
key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
return false;
case 91: // ctrl + R Button
LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
event.returnValue= false;
key=0;
return false;
Thanks.
But i am unable to control the multiple windows opening the browser.So any one can tell me the how to block the new window and new tab/duplicate tab option.
BR,
Durga Rao.

Disable the multiple Logons in ECC6 and allowing few users

Dear All,
I need to disable the multiple Logons in ECC6 and allowing few users, can multilogin in system.
I have seen that the parameter login/disable_multi_gui_login and login/multi_login_users can be set.
But need to know did any once use in Ecc6 system and what values to be given in login/multi_login_users.
Please suggest .
Regards,
Kumar

I have found an exmaple on the web of using javascript (it opens a child window that polls the parent window, and invalidates the session if the parent window is closed). I agree there always appears to be loop holes around most of th e solutions i've come across.
I had the same idea about invalidating any previously known session for the same userid, I'm pretty new to the java/web app world so I'm struggling with finding the information I need. I couldn't find any methods to call to invalidate another session, I only came accross example where the current session invalidated its own session via call to the session object, do you have any idea how I would do that for other sessions.
Mant thanks for your input.
Derek.

AcroPDF.dll User Licence and Allowed Usage

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for