ACS 5.2 reporting issue

Dear,
Concerning the user field (and other too), is it possible to use some sort of wildcard ?
I am having a hard time making reports for several users, for example :
I want to make a "radius session history" report for all PC's starting with host/PO1212
how do I do this ? I can't imagine this isn't possible in ACS.
Lieven Stubbe
Belgian railways

Hi,
We have been testing wireless telephony with Ascom i62 wireless handsets using EAP-TLS. Initial dot1x authentication is successful. Reauthentication sometimes fail on Cisco ACS Version 5.2.0.26.5
The same error mesage was displayed.
22047 Principal username attribute is missing in client certificate
Only rebooting the phone fixes this issue.
Are we hitting bug CSCtn26538 ?
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtn26538&from=summary
Best regards,
Peter

Similar Messages

ACS 5.0 having issues with different subnet AAA Clients

Dear All,
I am getting weird issue. My ACS 5.0 is in subnet 10.1.1.0/24. All the AAA clients which are in the same subnet can communicate with the ACS but different subnet cannot.
I have checked the firewall between them, Its allow any any with all services.
One more thing I have faced today is that now from only one switch (10.1.2.10) can access ACS but switches in the same subnet (10.1.2.0/24) cant access ACS as same previous issue.
Following are the logs of one switch(10.1.2.10) in different subnet can access ACS :
Working Switch with Same configuration:
SW-A#test aaa group tacacs+ test cisco legacy
Attempting authentication test to server-group tacacs+ using tacacs+
User was successfully authenticated.
SW-A#
*Nov 17 00:05:52.041: AAA: parse name=<no string> idb type=-1 tty=-1
*Nov 17 00:05:52.041: AAA/MEMORY: create_user (0x1B1FD04) user='test' ruser='NULL' ds0=0 port='' rem_addr='NULL' authen_type=ASCII service=LOGIN priv=1 initial_task_id='0', vrf= (id=0)
*Nov 17 00:05:52.041: TAC+: send AUTHEN/START packet ver=192 id=3237327729
*Nov 17 00:05:52.041: TAC+: Using default tacacs server-group "tacacs+" list.
*Nov 17 00:05:52.041: TAC+: Opening TCP/IP to 10.1.1.2/49 timeout=5
*Nov 17 00:05:52.041: TAC+: Opened TCP/IP handle 0x1B44D48 to 10.1.1.2/49
*Nov 17 00:05:52.041: TAC+: 10.1.1.2 (3237327729) AUTHEN/START/LOGIN/ASCII queued
SW-A#
*Nov 17 00:05:52.243: TAC+: (3237327729) AUTHEN/START/LOGIN/ASCII processed
*Nov 17 00:05:52.243: TAC+: ver=192 id=3237327729 received AUTHEN status = GETPASS
*Nov 17 00:05:52.243: TAC+: send AUTHEN/CONT packet id=3237327729
*Nov 17 00:05:52.243: TAC+: 10.1.1.2 (3237327729) AUTHEN/CONT queued
*Nov 17 00:05:52.444: TAC+: (3237327729) AUTHEN/CONT processed
*Nov 17 00:05:52.444: TAC+: ver=192 id=3237327729 received AUTHEN status = PASS
*Nov 17 00:05:52.444: AAA/MEMORY: free_user (0x1B1FD04) user='test' ruser='NULL' port='' rem_addr='NULL' authen_type=ASCII service=LOGIN priv=1 vrf= (id=0)
Logs from the same subnet switch (10.1.2.20) which cannot access ACS:
SW-B#test aaa group tacacs+ test cisco legacy
Attempting authentication test to server-group tacacs+ using tacacs+
No authoritative response from any server.
SW-B#
*Oct 20 00:54:12.834: AAA: parse name=<no string> idb type=-1 tty=-1
*Oct 20 00:54:12.842: AAA/MEMORY: create_user (0x1A6F3F0) user='test' ruser='NULL' ds0=0 port='' rem_addr='NULL' authen_type=ASCII service=LOGIN priv=1 initial_task_id='0', vrf= (id=0)
*Oct 20 00:54:12.842: TAC+: send AUTHEN/START packet ver=192 id=3281146755
*Oct 20 00:54:12.842: TAC+: Using default tacacs server-group "tacacs+" list.
*Oct 20 00:54:12.842: TAC+: Opening TCP/IP to 10.1.1.2/49 timeout=5
*Oct 20 00:54:12.842: TAC+: Opened TCP/IP handle 0x1B1E888 to 10.1.1.2/49
*Oct 20 00:54:12.842: TAC+: 10.1.1.2 (3281146755) AUTHEN/START/LOGIN/ASCII queued
SW-B#
*Oct 20 00:54:12.943: TAC+: (3281146755) AUTHEN/START/LOGIN/ASCII processed
*Oct 20 00:54:12.943: TAC+: received bad AUTHEN packet: type = 0, expected 1
*Oct 20 00:54:12.943: TAC+: Invalid AUTHEN/START/LOGIN/ASCII packet (check keys).
*Oct 20 00:54:12.943: TAC+: Closing TCP/IP 0x1B1E888 connection to 10.1.1.2/49
*Oct 20 00:54:12.943: TAC+: Using default tacacs server-group "tacacs+" list.
*Oct 20 00:54:12.943: AAA/MEMORY: free_user (0x1A6F3F0) user='test' ruser='NULL' port='' rem_addr='NULL' authen_type=ASCII service=LOGIN priv=1 vrf= (id=0)
Waiting for your responses.
Regards,
Anser

Ok, cool,
So this usually means that the switch is sourcing the requests from a difernet interface that is configured on the ACS.
I would guess that the ACS is reporting unknown NAS...
Can you please use the "ip tacacs source-interface" command to make sure the switch will source the Tacacs+ packets from the interface with the IP address for which you have the ACS configured to?
HTH,
Tiago
If this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.

Stage Analysis Report Issue

Hi,
I have run a stage analysis report but it says no data inspite of open opportunities being present in the system. Could anyone kindly let me know what could be the issue?
Regards
Sharat

Hi Sharat,
Welcome you to the forum. Please close your first thread.
Regarding your Stage Analysis Report Issue, what selection has been made? This report show closed opportunity only.
Thanks,
Gordon

GR/IR GL Reporting Issue

1. 30 documents of 2009 were matching and post with clear is perfomred. After performing post with clear also the line items are not moving from open line items. When we download the open line items as of today, these line items are appearing.
2. When we download the ZBLRFIOI report for GRIR a/c 349100 to have the opne line items. we have some set of documents showing as " FI Open items without J2" - This is reporting issues.
Thanks
Mallikarjuna

Hi
Pls try with F.13 for that GR/IR account 349100 by selecting check box select gl accounts
And give Company code, year and pending document numbers in selection screen
And before that pls make sure that OB74 clearing settings maintained or not
It will clear all the open items exists
Reg
Vishnu

BW Reporting Issue

Hi,
I am facing one reporting Issue relating to Display Attributes.
Characteristic: Business Partner
Display Attributes: Address0, Address1, Address3...etc.
Requirement is to display mentioned Display attributes along with Business Partner.
For this I have selected Business Partner as characteristic and mentioned above three as display attributes to Business Partner.
But Query out put is not showing Display attributes. For this I have done all settings at reporting level, all gone vain.
I am using Bex 7.0.
Kindly look in to the Issue and let me know the solution.
Regards,
Venkat.Mahipathi.
09886652422.
[email protected]

Hi,
Check in Reporting properties or check attributes in analyzer proprties then it will display
************asign points if usefull***********
swapna

User report issues in 1.1.0.21.97

A couple of issues i'm experiencing with user reports on Mac OS X in the latest pre-releas build
first off, if I am asked for a password (first time I use the connection) there is no feedback if the connection fails (worng password for instance)
The second problem I'm facing is every time I try to rerun a certain master-detail report I'm getting an NPE
this is the stacktrace:
22-nov-2006 15:37:31 oracle.report.addin.ReportEditor updateContent
INFO: ReportEditor.updateContent()
22-nov-2006 15:37:33 oracle.dbtools.raptor.controls.display.DisplayResultTable getUI
INFO: DisplayResultTable.getUI()
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.NullPointerException
at oracle.dbtools.raptor.controls.display.DisplayPanel.refresh(Unknown Source)
at oracle.dbtools.raptor.controls.display.DisplayPanel.refresh(Unknown Source)
at oracle.report.addin.ReportEditor$1.actionPerformed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1882)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:2202)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(DefaultButtonModel.java:420)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(DefaultButtonModel.java:258)
at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicButtonListener.mouseReleased(BasicButtonListener.java:234)
at java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.mouseReleased(AWTEventMulticaster.java:231)
at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:5554)
at javax.swing.JComponent.processMouseEvent(JComponent.java:3126)
at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:5319)
at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:2010)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4021)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2068)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3869)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Container.java:4256)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Container.java:3936)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Container.java:3866)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2054)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:1774)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3869)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:463)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:269)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:190)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:184)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:176)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:110)
reloadBuffers(): 53 nodes checked in 0.006489 second(s)
reloadBuffers(): 53 nodes checked in 0.005422 second(s)
reloadBuffers(): 53 nodes checked in 0.004306 second(s)
22-nov-2006 15:43:17 oracle.report.addin.ReportEditor updateContent
INFO: ReportEditor.updateContent()
only happens with master-detail report
Message was edited by: Barsema
barsema

We have verified the connection error on the latest evaluation build is working as expected. i.e. if you supply wrong password you get alerted to that. This has been verified on the windows and Mac OS X. Please try the latest evaluation release 1.1.0.22.71.
Your reports issue has also been addressed.
Sue

RESOLVED : Windows Phone – Download reporting issue related to 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 data

Update 3/22 - the below issue has been resolved.
It has come to our attention that certain Windows Phone download reporting aggregations are not matching. After investigation, we found an issue related to 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 transactions. For example, if you chose an “All
app” aggregation (6 month view) and compared it to “Monthly by app” aggregations (6 month view), the totals weren’t matching. The root cause of the issue was due to the 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 data not being considered for all of the available aggregations.
We are scheduled to fix the issue today.
If you have transactions between 11/1/14 – 11/9/14, you will see an increase in the following aggregation totals once the fix is completed:
Monthly aggregations (6 and 12 month views) by app and in-app aggregations
Cumulative downloads – app and in-app aggregations
Please note, this is strictly a download reporting issue. There is no impact to any payout reporting or payout amounts.
When the fix has been completed, I will update this post.
Thanks,
Patrick

Update 3/22 - the below issue has been resolved.
It has come to our attention that certain Windows Phone download reporting aggregations are not matching. After investigation, we found an issue related to 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 transactions. For example, if you chose an “All
app” aggregation (6 month view) and compared it to “Monthly by app” aggregations (6 month view), the totals weren’t matching. The root cause of the issue was due to the 11/1/14 – 11/9/14 data not being considered for all of the available aggregations.
We are scheduled to fix the issue today.
If you have transactions between 11/1/14 – 11/9/14, you will see an increase in the following aggregation totals once the fix is completed:
Monthly aggregations (6 and 12 month views) by app and in-app aggregations
Cumulative downloads – app and in-app aggregations
Please note, this is strictly a download reporting issue. There is no impact to any payout reporting or payout amounts.
When the fix has been completed, I will update this post.
Thanks,
Patrick

Odd Reporting Issue (ENTERPRISE)

I have a client with some users experiencing a rather odd reporting issue. The report runs fine, but only shows values for the totals and not the line items that make up the total.
For example, when I run the report (logged in as admin as well as under their ID), I see:
Net Sales 1,234
Cost Of Sales (1,111)
Gross Margin 123
When they log in on their machine, they see:
Net Sales
Cost Of Sales
Gross Margin 123
Very odd. I figured maybe it was an application setting, but the INI didn't look off anywhere particular.
They are running Enterprise 6.3.1 (yeah, insert comment here on the upgrade needed).
Any thoughts???

Check their Effective rights, and reset them, that has worked out for me. Otherwise, try copying the user and paste it as a new user and retest; I had to delete users and recreate them to correct problems of this nature.

ACE ACS TACACS+ Key Mismatch issue

Goodday,
I have an issue when trying to setup ACE Modules for TACACS+ and AAA autentication whereby the Failed Authentication reports, state the reason as "Key Mismath".
We have confirmed that the key we are using is the same on the ACE and on the ACS.
The question I have is as follows:
Should the key we enter on the ACE remain as we have typed it, so if we enter mysharedkey as the key should this show as such in the running config or should it show as encrypted? Currently it shows in the running as we have entered it but just adds the 7 before the key and places the key in inverted commas.
So config entered something like this:
tacacs-server host 10.10.10.10 key mysharedkey
aaa group server tacacs+ acs_pri
server 10.10.10.10
aaa authentication login default group acs_pri local none
BTW, we are running version 2.1.4(a).
Thanks for any assitance with this.
Paul

Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the reply. I can confirm we have the "ssh key rsa 1024 force". I even tried removing and re-issueing the command.
On the point of the show run revealing the something encrypted instead of the actual TACACS key, this is not what we see, we see the actual key we entred.
This is my concern.
We managed to get his working by checking on the production ACE modules and production ACS, using the "encryped" key we see in that "show run" and locating the key in the production ACS config (which was not under the ACE NDG, but under the ACS server itself's config, which also looks like something encrypted) and using this in the NDG config as the key for our ACE NDG on the test ACS.
The problem arises that every six months or so, securiy requirement, the keys change, and how will we then know what to apply on the ACE if it does not apply the encyption of the key we enter itself.
See my problem...
Thanks again for the assistance and any further guidance would be appreciated.
Paul.

Open PO Analysis - BW report issue

Hello Friends
I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
(Delivery completed).
We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
following:
DOC_NUM     DOC_ITEM      DOCTYPE     COMP_DEL
650000001       10     UB        X
650000001       20     UB        X
650000001       30     UB
650000001       40     UB
When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
system.
Any help is appreciated in this regard.
Thanks and Regards
sampath

Hi Priya and Reddy
   Thanks for your response.
                     Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
                    I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
                   In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
Record No.    Doc.No.                    Item              Processkey         Rocancel     Elikz
    41               6500000001            30                    11                            X           ---
    42               6500000001            30                    11                            ---           X
    43               6500000001            30                    10                            X           ---
    44               6500000001            30                    10                            ---         ---
(Here --- means blank)
Thanks and Regards
sampath

S_ALR_87012178 Report -Issue Related to Interest calculations

Hi,
When we run a customer open item analysis S_ALR-87012178 we see that there looks to be interest for overdue balances showing on the report. It doesn't appear to be assigning the interst to the customer, but I wanted to see why this was here and if we have the ability to assing interest to balances. And also where you would turn this on and off in the system or for a customer.
Kindly adivce me on this issue.i am confused because i didnot understand what they are asking.
Thanks
Sunitha

Hi,
You can go to F.99 in order to see all the reports for Customers.
Hope you will find the best suitable report.
When you are using "Drill down reports" do not forget to select
"Object list (more than one lead column)" this would give you a option to sort them the line items as you want.
Just for your information: SAP1 is the transaction code for all the reports in SAP.
Regards,
Ravi

Report issue on Virtual cube with services

Hi,
I'm following a how-to document to report on a virtual cube using a custom function module and everything seems to be OK except it is dumping at the following line which is included in the How To document "How Tou2026Implement a virtual InfoProvider with Services".
Both <l_s_data> and E_T_DATA are of same data types as discussed in the how-to document.
append <l_s_data> to E_T_DATA
These are the declarations which are same as HowTo document
E_T_DATA TYPE STANDARD TABLE
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <l_s_data> TYPE ANY.
Did any one face this issue. Greatly appreciate any insight into this issue. We are on BW 3.0B.
the dump i'm getting is ...
Data objects in a Unicode program are not convertible.
Error analysis
The statement    "MOVE src TO dst"   requires the operands "dst" and "src" to be comvertible.
Since this statement occurs in a Unicode program, the special convertibility rules for Unicode programs apply.
Thanks,
Hari Immadi
http://immadi.com
SEM BW Analyst

Hi,
In the debugging this is what I found out.. Any further insight?
Virtual cube has only 1 characteristic Z_CRNUM & only 1 keyfigure Z_SR
Report has only Z_CRNUM & Z_SR
<L_S_DATA> has following record & value
component      type     length     contents
K____504     P     9     1.000
S____504     C     18     16EA4D-R
K____504 is the technical name of Z_SR in virtual provider.
S____504 is the technical name of Z_CRNUM in virtual provider.
E_T_DATA (type standard table) has following structure with a total of 5 fields.
S____504    K____504           &KEYEND 1ROWCOUNT   Z_SR
Regards
Hari Immadi
http://immadi.com
SEM BW Analyst

XML Publisher Report Issues

Hi,
We have customized a report (XML Publisher) in which our template is in XSL format.When using this stylesheet (.XSL) to print out PO's, there are some problems with the page layout, more specifically regarding the page breaks:
1) Extra empty page is printed - can this be avoided?
2) If the entire line block does not fit on the page, the line should be completely shifted to the next page (called "widow and orfan control" in MS Word) ?
How to avoid these issues? Replies will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Sumir

Hi,
We have customized a report (XML Publisher) in which our template is in XSL format.When using this stylesheet (.XSL) to print out PO's, there are some problems with the page layout, more specifically regarding the page breaks:
1) Extra empty page is printed - can this be avoided?
2) If the entire line block does not fit on the page, the line should be completely shifted to the next page (called "widow and orfan control" in MS Word) ?
How to avoid these issues? Replies will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Sumir

AP Trial Balance Report Issue

Hi gurus- I run the AP Trial Balance report and have an issue that I cannot reconcile with my raw data because when I export into excel, the invoice number is cut off after 20 characters. This client has long invoice numbers. Is there any way to get the SQL for this report and run it separately so I may see the invoice numbers and reconcile? Thanks a lot.

Hi,
Please check note:553484.1, there are some queries provided to check the TB data like queries to compare XLA and GL data.
Hope it helps

Custom Report issue

Hi Gurs,
I am in middle of a custom report developement which proivdes PO numbera and some of its relative dat, PR number and its relative data againust all the status of invoices(posted,parked,cancelled etc)
the issue i m facing is client wants Purchasing group in input screen, i took the purchasing group from EBAN, but when i run the report its taking lot of time to execute,
Could any one tell me how can i filtter the data so that i can get all the above mentioned data for a PG, or can i add any other field and make it mandatory to filter,
please suggest any other approches /idea/ how can i reduce the time interval
Thanks
Ravi

HI,
At present we are using logic based on input example PR number first program will extract data for PR and then It checks EKKO and EKPO for PO numbers and for filter PO number program will check RBKP for invoice numbers,
Its real Logic or you give example only?
But if i provice Purchasing group it checks the whole EBAN and next process the same steps,
its throwing run time errore,
As you said your company code and invoice document date are mandatory field
so your logic should flow from invoice table and end on PR number like below
RBKP and RSEG you will get invoice document date and Po number
Now pass Po number into table EKPO and get PR number ,if you want report for purchasing group wise then
add table EKKO and pass Po number there and ask ABAP consultant that when Purchasing group on selection screen ,output show only that Purchase group related
Regards
Kailas Ugale

ACS 5.2 reporting issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for