Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts

under configuration if we tick on "Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
then what would be the impact?
Thanks & Regards
Nitin Gupta

Hi
When u tick "direct posting the material" material tab will be available in MIRO screen ( along with PO reference )
here u can post invoices w/o reference to PO directly material account
Check info Given by SAP
If you have activated posting to material accounts in Customizing, you can enter invoice lines without a PO reference on the Material tab page. These lines are then posted to the given material when you post the invoice
When posting directly to a material, no posting is made to a GR/IR clearing account. The system posts manually entered material lines directly to the stock account or a price difference account, depending on price control and stock coverage
Vishal...

Similar Messages

MIRO - Activate Direct posting to G/L Account - user exit/badi

Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to restrict the acces to the direct posting to GL account tab in MIRO.
Activation of the flag in config leads to the appearance of this tabpage in all MIRO transactions.
My cliente needs this tab page to appear in only a certain set of circumstances.
Is there a user-exit or BADI to manipulate the "Direct-posting Tab" in this way?
Anyone has done something like that?
Thanks for any reply.
Aart

By creating transaction variant & restricting g/l account tab through authorization for required users.

MIRO: Activate Direct Posting to G/LAccounts and Material Accounts

Hi,
To which table does the following customising write to:
IMG/Materials Management/Logistics Invoice Verification/| Incoming Invoice/Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts
Thanks
-S-

TCULIV
Regards.

Activating Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts

Hi,
Can anyone plz tell me with some examples ,what is the relevance of this ,'Activating Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts'.
Link for this is as below :
spro/Materials Management/ Logistics Invoice Verification / Incoming Invoices / Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts
Whether normally everyone will use this or not ?
regards,

Sandeep
In Logistics Invoice Verification, you can also post invoices that do not refer to a purchase order or a delivery. A typical example of this is a bill for expenses.
As in the case of an invoice with a reference, you first need to enter the header data and the vendor information.
In contrast to invoices with a reference, the system does not display any proposed values for the invoice items, since it cannot determine any purchase order items and posted goods receipts for this invoice. As a result, the system does not know which accounts are affected by the offsetting entry for the vendor line item. Therefore, you must specify which accounts the amounts are to be posted to. The SAP System provides the following options:
Posting to a G/L account
You post to G/L accounts if you, for example, want to settle small amounts for freight costs and similar items and do not want to add these to the material accounts or cost accounts for the invoice items.
Posting to a material account
You post to material accounts, if you, for example, want to debit or credit a material without using a purchase order reference
You can also combine these options by generating the relevant posting lines one after the other, or by generating lines with reference to a purchase order.
When you enter an invoice without a reference, you may find that a vendor has not been created in the system. You can post this invoice to a one-time account.
You can have activated this functionality if you want to post directly to GL account and material.
Hope this clarifies
Thanks & Regards,
Sridhar

Direct posting of G/L account is not allowed at PO level.

Hi,
Procurement of Consumables thru Maintenance Order (for Breakdown Maintenance):
1. Generation of Purchase Requisition thru maintenance order .
2. Purchase Order from purchase requisition
3. MIGO
4. MIRO
The required consumables are assigned in maintenance order. when converting PR to PO this consumables will automatically flow. According to the valuation class and gl account in material master GL account will also flow automatically.
When converting PR to PO the system throws an error saying that Direct posting is not possible for the G/L account.
I made this GL account as post automatically to ensure that there should be no manual postings for such automatic account determinated GL accounts thru valuation class.
This error can be resolved by removing the tick mark post automatically but is this correct. If it is so then what is the implication of automatic a/c assignment thru valuation class.
Please guide
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Sam

Dear Sir,
We have added the Consumables (Diesel) in Components tab with Item category N. So, it has triggered a PR from MO. As you know account assignment category is ORDER (F) only.
Also, they have resolved the problem. Problem was with the G/L account Master data.
Thanx a lot
Regards
Sam

Credit Memo all my material items to be directly posted to Balance Sheet account

Hi Experts
My client has a scenario where for certain items they create a credit memo request document and finally a credit memo document from the VKOA system is picking the revenue bearing GL and posting all the line items to that G/L account
Manually my customer is again checking and extracting the p/l and posting to balance sheet account
is there a way where we can directly post these entries to Balance Sheet account
Best Regards
Waseem

Hi Sanil
Thanks for the quick reply, can we assign a balance sheet account directly in VKOA in the G/L account field or do we need to add this in directly in Provision acc field
As suggested by you we already have the access sequence with respect to Order Reason, I am just doubtful wether we can directly give Balance Sheet account in G/L account field
Best Regards
Waseem

Direct Posting of Sales in FI and month end closing

Dear Experts
I learnt that :
Sales Direct Entries may be posted in FI without posting in SD/MM.
Sales entries must always be posted only through SD process. If this is NOT done (for example freight rate received from third party freight forwarders), then only FI people should know how to reconcile and NOT sd people. Hence I recommend posting your query in FI forum after closing this thread.
Regards,
My question is , during month-end closing how should FI or accounting address the above direct posting issues?
Apparently, such practice is not right.
There is no trace of the sales in SD MM. There is no corresponding billing doc in SD MM but found in FI .
How should this situation be handled as best practice?
I am BI person but found this issue with FI data not reconciled with SD MM.
I am not sure how the month-end closing was done when there is such data. Yes, the problem was found AFTER month was closed and I loaded the data to BI.
best regards
Pascal

Dear Sirs
What is the fastest easiest way to find out which FI direct entries were posted without corresponding Sales / Billing documents created ?
Is there any standard report or reports available in oss?
Currently, our other interfacing systems are having problem with data due to direct entries where there is no corresponding Sales / Billing docs posted. This is causing a lot of time investigating what entries caused the reconciliation problem.
Your help would make my life easier.
Thanks!
Regards
Pascal

Direct Posting to G/L Account in MIRO

Hi,
I have created a Purchase Order with following conditions
Qty     50
Price     100
Total (Accessible Value for Excise)     5000
Excise     500
Ecess     10
HSCess     5
Total Excise     515
Total+Excise For VAT     5515
VAT     744.525
Total Payable to Vendor     6259.525
Here please note that the Excise is being calculated on Rs. 5000.
When we receive the Excise Invoice, the Vendor is charging the Excise on different Accessable Value i.e. on Rs. 16000
While posting the Excise Invoice, I have changed the Accessible Value and the following FI document is generated:
24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     6
24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     600
24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     12
13113920     CENVAT clearing     618.00-
While posting the Vendor Invoice, the system is showing a difference in Ecess, SHEcess & VAT Amount as shown below:
K     13000000     PK Industries PVT LTD      6,359.53-
S     13110100     GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom     5,000.00
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     600
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     10
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     5
S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     744.53
To match the difference we posted the difference in VAT & Cenvat the G/L Account tab and Rs, 135.01- in Unpl. Del. Csts
The system is generating the following FI Entries
K     13000000     PK Industries PVT LTD      6,376.43-                    **
S     13110100     GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom     5,000.00     4500000841     EE
M     24340000     SinarMatArtCard>220gsm63.5x91"     131.03-     4500000841     EE
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     1.95                    V0
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     0.97                    V0
S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     145.01
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     600                    EE
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     10                    EE
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     5                    EE
S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     744.53                    EE
My question/ doubt is:
1.     Is this the correct way to pass the difference in VAT & Excise directly to G/L Accounts?
2.     Why in MIRO, the BED is correct & ECess & HSCess are wrong? Is this related with Tax Procedure & Pricing Procedure?
3.     What is the standard way for handling the above situation. Please note that this situation is coming for only one Excise Vendor.
Please advise.
Regards,

1.In J1IEX, we could not found MRP Indicator check box in miscellaneous tab.
Where do we need to change in the Configuration.
Refer this thread [MRP indicator|Re: MRP indicator]
2.While posting the MIRO, the following entries were generated, which is wrong?
Here tax amount being calculate is wrong;
it should be 240 as per the manual. On simulation, the ECess amount is not shown.
As suggested in earlier reply,Please check tax procedure with help of FI consultant.
3.When capturing the Invoice in MIGO, MRP Indicator check box was there in Miscellaneous tab.
But the HSCess was not in editable mode, we could just enter the Basic Duty & ECess Amount.
There are lot of threads regarding hecess not editable,Pl search.
If possible can you please provide the details of the process from PO to MIRO
along with FI Entries so that I can test the same again (to get a clear cut concept of the process).
1.Purchase order with price + excise values with dealer tax code.
2. GR with excise (capture & post) or
A.Capture excise with ref. to p.o using J1IEX,tick mark mrp indicator,change excise base value,enter other excise amounts.
B. GR with ref. to ex. inv. no(In step A) - Refer exise invoice only
C. Post excise with ref. to ex. inv. no.
3. Vendor invoice ref. to delivery note no.
FI entries for GR
Stock account Dr to GR/IR a/c
Excise entries
Cenvat payable ED,CS,HECS Dr to Cenvat clearing a/c
Vendor invoice entries
GR/IR A/c,Cenvat clearing a/c,VAT/CST a/c Dr to Vendor a/c
Hope it solves problem.
Note :
I will suggest you to search forum before posting basic questions.
Don;t post multiple questions.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 4, 2010 3:05 PM

Direct Posting to g/l accounts

Dear all,
Client is buying a material, with material master having Qty and value update locally through petty cash. They donu2019t want do PO and GR. They want to settle it directly in MIRO. But they need qty and value updation. Is it possible ? how to do it in SAP ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Raman

Hi,
Its better to use materials of material type "UNBW" for this Purchase. it has only quantity update and no value update means at the time of GR, value of material will get expensed out and quantity will get stored in inventory (Check in MMBE) and then consume it as per requirement in MIGO using GI Movement types.
1. ME21N - Create PO with Acct Assmt Cat for the materials for e.g. K -Cost Center
2. MIGO - GR w.r.t. PO
Expense A/c - Dr
GR/IR Clearing - Cr
3. MIRO - LIV w.r.t. PO
Vendor A/c - Cr
GR/IR Clearing - Dr
Else go for direct GR w/o reference MIGO using movement type 501 and then go to FB60 - Enter Vendor Invoice and then do payment.

Need to check PO Posting date at schedule line and material document level

HI All,
I am facing an issue to reconciliation data with ECC.
Issue :
we have a PO,item,schedule line with delivery date, scheduled qty and quantity received from EKET table
we have PO,item,Material document,movement type,posting date with quantity received from EKBE table
the standard extractor 2LIS_02_SGR is providing data at
PO,item,schedule line,material document,movement,posting date
as if now we are using this extractor to get the posting date at schedule line level.
can some one let me know how exacty the EKET and EKBE table are joined ???

Hi,
The data for the datasource 2lis_02_sgr can be compared in ECC using ME80FN transaction.
Please check the below Link for all the details reragrding 2LIS_02_SGR datasource.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_dm40/helpdata/en/69/063f3f2615e07fe10000000a114084/content.htm]
Hope this helps..
Thanks,
Nagarjuna

Direct Posting to Contracts and Business roles in SRM

Hi guys,
We have SRM 7 and ECC 6.0.
Please consider the following business scenario:
Invoice creation in SRM against ERP contract that has been previously replicated to SRM;
No PO or GR involved in this process;
Possibility to have one contract to vendor A, and the corresponding invoices for different vendors.
Considering this we thought about the following solution:
Activate Direct Posting to Contracts functionality in ERP;
Contract, supplier and materials / services replication to SRM, through PI;
Allow different partners in the contract, using partner role “Invoicing party” (RS), so that it would be possible to post an invoice to vendor B, with reference to a contract with vendor A.
Questions:
Reporting – as far as I know it’s only possible to run analyses for vendors, which in our case would be vendor A, assigned to the contract. However, we will need to have information about the invoices posted to the other business partners that are assigned to that contract. Do you have any idea if there is any standard approach for this?
Contract and business roles replication to SRM – does the contract and the assigned business roles could be replicated to SRM or is it required any specific customizing in SRM for this to be possible?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
AN

Hi,
For direct posting to G/L in MIRO, follow the path:
SPRO > Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > Incoming Invoice > Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts > Here Activate "Dir.posting to G/L acct = active" and save.
MIRO - It will show additional Tab as "GL Account" along with "Reference"
For more check the links:
http://www.saptechies.com/transaction-mr1m-direct-posting-to-gl-account/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17887583/MM-FI-Account-Determination
Regards,
Biju K

Direct posting to material

Dear all,
I have actived Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts in Spro --> Materials Management --> Materials Management --> Incoming Invoice --> Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts --> Dir.posting to matl = active.
when I use tcode miro --> subsequent credit --> enter material A, plant, valuation type into MATERIAL TAB, the system only suggests the quantity in the stock but I want it suggests the total of quantity of material A which was procured, For example:
I procured A 100 pcs and sold 60 pcs, quantity in stock 40 pcs. When I input in material tab, the system only displays quantity is 40 pcs but I need it is 100 pcs. How can I do that?
PLEASE HELP????
Edited by: Luong Kieu Thi on Jul 11, 2011 1:03 PM

Since only 40 is stock, only for that quantity subsequent credit can be posted otherwise, you cannot have a balance in FI postings. So if you need to post on 100 PCs, then the only choice for you is to cancel the issue of 60 PCs, then post the subsequent credit on 100 PCs and then redo the issue of 60 PCs again.

Account cannot be directly posted

Dear Expert,
Running the FAGL_FC_TRANSLATION program and upon running the program it has an error due to trying to post to reconciliation accounts. Assets & AP.
Do you know if their is a area to configure?
Regards
Tom

Hello,
Only at the time of Initial upload of assets into system before go-live, the reconciliation accounts will be set to non-reconciliation account and upload the asset balances, then later they will be set to reconciliation account, once everything has been tallied.
A reconciliation account cannot be directly posted in FI. You CANNOT directly post to a reconciliation account.
You CANNOT also post to an account, where it has been kept as direct posting by system. In such cases the system only posts from other areas like MM, SD to these accounts.
Regards,
Ravi

MIRO - deactivate direct posting to GL / material acct for selected company codes

Hi All,
I have a requirement to deactive direct posting to G/L and material accounts in MIRO, however, only for selected company codes (this cannot be done for all of them on client level in SPRO->Material Management->Logistic Invoice verification->Incoming Invoice -> Activate direct posting to GL/ Material accounts).
The thing is that for those company codes, MIRO posting has to be made always with Purchase Order Reference.
My idea is to build simple validation rule:
if company code is equal to (SET) and Purchase Order Reference is empty then error message should appear: "Posting without PO reference not allowed"
I was also thinking on creating own layout in MIRO and assign it to clerks which are responsible for posting in those company codes.
Can you advise on that, please?
Best regards,
Lukasz

Hi Tejas,
Thanks for your reply.
Answering your questions:
1. The thing is that these GLs are being posted with other transactions.
2. My concern is that after the document is parked and while editing user will delete PO reference, it can be any GL account picked in "GL tab" of MIRO transaction. My understanding is that I should put tick on "Post automatically only" on all the GL accounts which users are able to use (correctly or not) in that case.
My aim in this configuration is to restrict those posting in such way that users are not allowed to use them - and this is only in regards to MIRO transaction.

"No direct posting can be made to G/L account 140000 in cocode GBTS

hello gurus
below is the problem i asked earlier
iam creating PO with account assignment category 'K' . I have been cncountered with a probklem
"No direct posting can be made to G/L account 140000 in cocode GBTS
Diagnosis
G/L account entered is a control account .transaction cannot posted directly to a control accountPL giv solution for this
1. for the above i gave post automatically in fsoo trans of credit/bank/interest tab .it again gives below error
"post auto only" and recon.account for acct type" cancel each other out
2.in fsoo ,control data i gave ALL TAX TYPES ALLOWED IN TAX CATEGORY.
AGAIN WHILE CREATING PO GIVING
"No direct posting can be made to G/L account 140000 in cocode GBTS
pl solve this
thanks
chandrasekhar

Hi,
In FS00,in Create/Bank/Interest tab , tick the check box Post Automatically only.
Regards

Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for