Activate text for Cost Center for ME51N, ME52N, ME53N

Hi, experts
As a requirement on T/C ME51N, ME52N, ME53N is needed to activate on "Account assignment" tab, the text for Cost Center field, how can I do this?
Thanks in advance.
Is there any path or exit could help with it?

I need to add on Tabstrip "Account assignment" for fields
CO Area and Cost Center text field description ( right side ) for each one.
How can I do this? Thanks in advance.

Similar Messages

Separate gl account for cost center for movement type 201

HI Guys,
I have a the following problem:
There are three main functional areas i.g
Production - (Cost Center 10001)
Sales - (Cost Center 10002)
Admin - (Cost Center 10003)
In obyc we use 5 types of valuation classes like three sets different for production, Sales and Admin
Production
P-Electrical (GL Account 50001)
P-Tools (GL Account 50002)
P-Oil Lubes (GL Account 50003)
P-Bearing (GL Account 50004)
P-Belts (GL Account 50005)
Sales
S-Electrical (GL Account 60001)
S-Tools (GL Account 60002)
S-Oil Lubes (GL Account 60003)
S-Bearing (GL Account 60004)
S-Belts (GL Account 60005)
Admin
A-Electrical (GL Account 70001)
A-Tools (GL Account 70002)
A-Oil Lubes (GL Account 70003)
A-Bearing (GL Account 70004)
A-Belts (GL Account 70005)
I want use 5 series gl when I use Production valuation classes, 6 series when I use Sales valuation classes and 7 series when I use Admin valuation classes in VBR general modification but system allows me to use standard valuation classes.
please how I can get this problem get solved that the concerned GL accounts must be hit for proper allocation of expenses by areas.
Thanks
Ahmed

Hi
I think i have to rephrase the question .
When you do a goods issue via migo and movement type 201 the user should not be allowed to input the GL account as it should be automatically determined through valn class setting in GBB-VBR.
But in my case the system is also giving the GL account field as available to user for input .This is wrong .
How to make this field suppress / greyed out is the problem ?

Validation for Cost center for Goods issue against the cost centers

Dear Friends
In my client place we have 6 plants are defined and profit centers are defined for each plant. Hence here each plant is one profit center. Cost centers are defined plant wise.
The requirement is when the goods issued to cost center system should check the cost center is defined against the plant. ( i.e., Cost center def against the Profit Center, and Profit center equal to Plant).
Is there any provision to assign the plant to profit center or vice versa?
Please guide me how to resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Please check EC01. May be it can help you. But in my view it is not possible.

User Exit ME51N/ME52N/ME53N when save purchase requisition

Hi,
I want to validate purchase requisition data for release startegy. If there is no value for release startegy .Then ME51N/ME52N/ME53N populate a custom message before saving.
I have found the Enhancement MEREQ001.Can anyone help me to find the exit because there are 10 user exit for this enhancment.
Thanks in advance,
Harinder

Hi,
Follow the following steps to find the EXIT
1. Open transaction SE24.
2. Now open the object CL_EXITHANDLER in display mode.
3. Go to the method tab and double click on the method GET_INSTANCE.
4. Put a break point on cl_exithandler=>get_class_name_by_interface.
5. Now execute the transaction you want to find EXIT for, it will take you to the above method.
6. Write EXIT_HANDLER in fieldnames and hit enter, it will tell you the EXIT used for your transaction.
7. Hit F8 and it will tell you all the EXITu2019s for your transaction.
Now put break points in each user exit and check which one gets triggered for your transaction.
Regards,
Manish

Display descriptions of cost center and G/L account in ME51N/ME52N/ME53N

Hi Experts,
Can any one suggest that how to display descriptions of cost center and G/L account in account assignment subscreen- ME51N / ME52N / ME53N.
Thanks in Advance...
Siva

hi
if the field is required then u have to enter them manually
so if this are not required then goto OKB9 here give the default cost center for the Gl acct

Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll

Hello all. I have this scenario with a company that was merged into another and retroactive payroll occurs for absences and extra time in the "old" company, but the "old" merged company is closed so no postings can occur.
I also found this unanswered post: How to Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll
We suppose that retroactive differences could be accounted in the new company code but I didnu2019t found any way to do it even in the BADI SMOD_PCPO0001 I couldnu2019t find a way to change the company code/cost center....
Does anyone have dealt with the same problem? What is the solution?

Amosha, thank you for your response. Here is PCP0 that shows what I mean by 'header company code' that I don't see how to change (I re-ran pd 26 2008--bi-weekly payroll, btw):
06/30/2009 Posting Document
Run                      0000002791
Company Code    0057
Document            0000008174
PostingCurrency USD
Reference           HRPAY00009
Doc. Type            ZB
Run Type             PP
Posting Date        12/01/2008
Documant Type   G/L Account Document
Document Date    06/30/2009
Bus. Transaction HRP1
    There are error messages for this document
Account Number with Text
21301000   Accrued Salaries & Wages   CCTR 14515      ...
20303998   HR P/R Doc Split                                               ...
Messages for Document 000008174
Error in document: HRPAY 0000008174
The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 0001, not 0057
Company code 0057 is now closed and has been merged into 0001. Cost center 14515 in the above doc was populated by my clone of RPCIPE00 and call to my BAdI which retrieved current company and cost center from PA0001. You can see from above that the 'header' data still shows 0057 and indeed, my version of RPCIPE00 only changes P_ITEM-BUKRS, P_ITEM-KOSTL and P_ITEM-SGTXT. It looks to me that fm HRPP_TRANSLATE_FICO gets the 'header' company code afresh. I was planning to leave WPBP-BUKRS (and all other Payroll data) alone (ie, not override company code).
As for your other question, we post retros to /551 and /552.
Thanks again.

Search Help for Cost center

Hi All,
I have 2 questions
1) we dont have any default cost center maintained any where in the org-structure (PPOMA_BBP), howeverwhenever I go for shopping I can see a cost center along with GL account, ( I know GL acct is coming from "determine GL account for prod-cat" settings in IMG), but what about cost center where is it coming from ??
2) second, when we do search help for cost center's in shopping application, we are able to see all cost centers from the back end which I guess is good, but we can see even those cost centers which are blocked!!!, why is this happening ??,
Thanks.

Hello,
For First::
In general the CO Area (here: cost center) is derived from R/3 Backend Enterprise
Structure and should be re-determined if another acc. objects is
entered that belongs to a different CO Area. Please also check the
settings in R/3 Backend IMG, path:
->Enterprise Structure ->Assignment ->Controlling
->Assign company code to controlling area
The company code is assigned to the CO Area through the following
assignment:
->Materials Management
->Assign purchasing organization to company code
The CO Area is in general the organizational object in
highest (CO) level. Assignments to other MM/CO objects are located
in lower Enterprise hierarchy level. Hence, the CO Area does not
change if a different CO object of a lower level (here: cost center)
is assigned to a SRM document.
For Second::
The only possibility I see is to set the message to error message in
the customizing in the backend. The message number is KI 170. When you
look at the long text of this message in transaction SE91 in the
backend, you will find the description where to look in the customizing.
When you have set this message to ERROR, then no purchase order will be
created in the backend. Instead the shopping basket gets the status
'ERROR' and the administrator will recieve a work item in his inbox.
Then he can check the backend and either post the purchase orders again
after solving the problem, or he can delete the shopping baskets.
Please check the note for more infos or the documentation.
Setting the message KI 170 to error message will solve your problem.
See note 333136. I would think that if you create
a PO directly in the backend if you do not have the message configured
as and error you will be able to create the PO.
I hope this information helps.
Kind regards,
Gaurav

Derivation of Funds Center from cost center for Asset PR/PO in FM

Hello Experts,
We configured new FM area and relevant BCS settings. It is working fine except PR or PO for Account assignment category A.
Issue: system is not able derive funds center from cost center in the asset master. cost center is not updated in EBKN table for Asset PR.
we have maintained the following;
1. Funds center is activated in Asset account assignments
2. Maintained derivation rule with function module: FMDT_READ_MD_ASSET
3. Derivation rule for cost center to funds center also maintained
If maintain funds center manually in PR it is working fine and consuming budget also.
Requirement: How derive funds center from cost center assigned in asset. I have verified all tickets raised in this forum, but nothing has answered my question.
Request you to provide solution for above issue.
Thanks in advance for support.
Regards,
Chalapathi

Hi Venkata,
You have two derivation rules, first related to Asset function module and second one is related to CC and FC combination.
You need to maintain the function module derivation rule first then you need to maintain the derivation rule related to combination of CC and FC. Because first you need to derive CC from asset master and then you need to derive fund center with reference to this CC.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

How to run GR55 reports in background for cost center hierarchies

1. I have been asked by our users to create batch jobs to run in the background for some GR55 reports, that can then be sent directly to cost center managers via email.
I have figured out the process to do this as long as the cost center manager only needs to see a single cost center at a time. However, if they are in charge of multiple cost centers, we also want to send them a summarized report using the hierarchy we have set up. I can't seem to make this work, as the job only seem to recognize the last cost center in the group and the report is for that cost center.
Example. cost centers 100, 200 and 300 belong to hierarchy abc. If I run the job just for cost center 100 it is fine. But if I have a variant to run hierarchy abc, or even if I use the range 100 to 300, all I get is a report for cost center 300.
We cannot use BW because we only have revenue in BW. I am being asked to make this work from standard R/3 within the GR55 realm of reporting.
2. In addition, the report selection criteria includes two separate plan/forecast versions. They need to update these each month prior to running the reports and sending them out. I looked at the variables associated with the versions and tried to set them up with default values that I hoped would update automatically so that they don't have to manually change 50 or so variants each month. But I don't see any dynamic variables that I can use to have the system make that change without going into each variant individually.
3. There is another piece to this equation as well. There is another report they want sent out in batch, but it is several pages wide in SAP and several pages long. So when you run it in batch and either spool it or get it sent as an email, it is very ugly in the formatting due to all the page splits horizontally and vertically. If anyone knows how to get the report to stay together like it would if you had excel integration turned on, it would be very helpful. I have tried running it with that integration turned on, but the jobs are set up with user batch_mgr and not my id, so it isn't working well. The batch_mgr id is just a system id, not a dialog id. We also don't want the jobs set up with a regular user id because if people leave, then the jobs all need to be changed.

Kim,
I may have options for issues 1 and 2. In case of 3, what I can tell you is I understand the concern, but this is what typically happens in some standard CO reports that are not ALV compatible, I don't think there is not much there to do unless you add some custom code for the output.
In regards to point 1, yes, I have noticed that this happens in some standard and custom reporting, not sure what is going on. I came up with a work around that made the trick for my client in a similar scenario; which is editing the cost center groups. For instance, instead of having the group set as a range from 100 to 300, the groups are have listed the cost centers, 100, 200 and 300. Obviously, the disadvantage of this option is that it would require a bit of more cost center group maintenance.
In regards to point 2, I understand from your note that your users already have set up selection variants for the report. One option for you is to get the help from a developer to create a custom period variable and tiny program that runs in batch every month that would update that variable accordingly. Once that's done, you may have to update at least once, the selection variant attributes to change the period to a selection variable, so everytime from that point of time forward that the variable gets updated, it will be ready with the right value for every selection variant that uses it.
Hope this helps.
GG

KO88 - Error when settling for Cost Center AND Auc for the same Internal Or

Hi Experts,
We need to configure Investment Internal Orders that could settle to both Cost Center and Auc, but each assignments with different Source Cost Elements
We did the following:
1. Created Auc Class
2. Created Investment Profile "IMOBIL" and assigned to Auc Class, flagging Auc
3. Created Allocation Structure "CV" with two assignments:
01, Source = Cost elements 7000000000 to 7999999999, receiver AUC "by cost element"
02 Source = Cost elements 4000000000 to 4999999999, receiver CTR "by cost element"
4. Created Model Order, filling the Investment Profile IMOBIL created in step 2.
5 Created Settlement Profile ZCV0001, assigning Allocation Strucutre CV, allowing CTR and AUC for receivers, default receiver is "FXA", doc type "AA".
6 Created ORder Type CV01, assigning Settlement Profile ZCV0001.
When I post only for Asset Expenses (Source Cost element 7, Assigment 01), the settlement through KO88 correctly settles to AUC, and also creates the settlement rule for cost center (i'm using the strategy to create from Responsible Cost Center).
But when I post for Asset Expenses (cost elements 7, receiver AUC) AND General Expenses (Source Cost element 4, receiver CTR), KO88 generates an error KD506, saying that for Assigment 02 - AUC I didnt define a settlement cost element.
1. Assignment 02 is not AUC, is CTR;
2. I flagged "by cost element", so I don't need a settlement cost element. And also, I was able to post to AUC when the source posting was only for cost element 7.
Did you face any problem like this?
I cannot find out what is the missing configuration, or if it is a program error...
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Hi Ajay
I already created Source Structure and assigned to my Setllement profile (so I assigned Allocation Structure AND Source Structure).
I don't understand when you say that I need to assign the Source Sutrcture in each rule....because the Source structure is in the Settlement Parameters valid for both rules...
When I post to Asset Expenses only for the internal Order, the 2 rules (CTR and AUC) are created when I run KO88 (but only AUC rule is settled). This is OK.
The problem is when I post for both General Expenses AND Asset Expenses, the system is not recognizing that I have 2 source structures, neither is findind that for CTR AND AUC the Settlement cost elements are the original cost elements.
I'm thinking about changing message KD506 to warning, do you know if this can help?
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

How to write a validaton rule for Cost Center and plant in PO

Hi,
I need to write a Validation Rule for Cost center and Plant in Purchase Order to get the error message if the Plant and cost center combination didnot match.
But i am not sure in which transaction code do we need to write this validation. Kindly help me by giving T.Code or path to do validation at PO level.
Thanks
Sunil

>
Sunil Pal Raj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to write a Validation Rule for Cost center and Plant in Purchase Order to get the error message if the Plant and cost center combination didnot match.
>
> But i am not sure in which transaction code do we need to write this validation. Kindly help me by giving T.Code or path to do validation at PO level.
>
> Thanks
> Sunil
Check OKC7
Regards,
Indranil

Purchase Order For Cost Center

Hi,
1. Please explain as I am trying to create a PO and i gave Account type: K(Cost center). I got the following error
"Create Account 140000 as a cost element in controlling area 4000 "
How can i solve this problem. I actually created a cost center : 4000. How to assign a cost element to controlling area.
2.Is it Necessary to maintain the G/L A/c while procuring for Cost center??
Or Cost Center is Sufficient ??

HI Kapil,
For any accounting entry you need to define a General Ledger Account where the details (Amount) of the transaction will be stored.
Just by maintaining cost centre will not help in completing any transaction involving accounts. So you need to maintain G/L account in the controlling area of your company code.
You can use T Code FS00 to create new G/L account in the chart of accounts.
In the edit cost element Tab you can give the cost center that you want.
I hope this helps.
thanks
rahul goel

Control G/L account and Cost Center for movement type 251

Dear Friends,
I would like to use mov. type 251 for GI for sale and like to control over G/L account and Cost center.
The G/L account is by default from the valuation class of the the material and if the user will enter wrong G/L
we had done the customising in OMJJ movement type 251 - Account grouping - Unchecked the check box of column
"Check account assignment" - Impact is " the system always uses the G/L accounts or account assignments determined automatically"
I also made default cost center for G/L account and plant wise through OKB9.
Now I would like to suppress/dispaly the G/L account and cost center - for same I had done Setting in Entry control menu of OMJJ for 251 of field Account control - Value - "-" field is suppressed. But it is not working.
Please advise to solve this situation.
Thanks & Regards
Rajan

Dear Rajan
Yes, I have checked in MB1A earlier. We have separate node for Field seletion layout for Enjoy transaction MIGO for mvt type in which the G/L account (KONTO) an Cost center (KOSTL) have only optional or required entry selection.
warm regards
Ramakrishna.

Creation of multiple cost center for one emplyee

HI All,
I have requirement . one emplyee is working two projects so need create two cost centers for one employee.
please tell me how create multiple cost center for one employee.
Thanks&Regards
ramesh

hai.
if he works half the time... u can give 50%.. or just get it confirmed from core team member..
manu

BPS Retraction for cost center accounting

hi guys,
   When i create sender structure for retraction,need to specify the retraction target(eg UPB_RET_COPS) using drop down to find.But i can't find any value after using drop down button.So i want to know how and where to define the retraction target,in BPS or R/3?
   The dictionary structure has the same problem.
   And what do mean the fields of 'offset' and 'sender field lgth'?
   Need your help!
   thanks a lot!
frank feng

Hi,
Go through following links where u can get a fair idea for u r problem:
/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/07/01/bps-retraction-for-cost-center-accounting--i
/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/07/11/bps-retraction-for-cost-center-accounting--ii-primary-cost-qty
Thanks,
Debasish

Activate text for Cost Center for ME51N, ME52N, ME53N

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for