Activating Cost Component Split

Hi People,
I have to do some tests and for while i need to activate the "cost component split" in the path:
\IMG\ Controlling\ Product Cost Controlling \ Actual Costing/Material Ledger \ Actual Costing \ Activate Actual Cost Component Split  (by valuation area)
I would like to know if there is some impacts for that and
if we have some problems to revert, becuase at this moment it is only a test.
Thanks,
Rosana.

Hello Paul,
Thanks for your answer.
We already use "material ledgder" but we don´t have activate component split. But look, what I am talkin is only one transaction (that I said before), becuase I have to do some test inside the aplication BW and it is a prerequisite.
I would like to know what is the impact to activate the component split on that transaction I said before.
It is only a test, but I don´t know if I put a flag in that transaction, the system will create some table internally.
And other thing I don´t know is, if It it is possible to reverte the activation (only in that transaction) that I would update and if there is some impacts.
Thanks a lot.

Similar Messages

  • Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

    Hello Gurus,
    Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
    Thanks
    RG

    Hi Raghu,
    After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
    Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
    If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
    Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
    You will be able to get the comparison...
    Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Actual Cost component split - Per PO

    Dear ML Experts,
    We have activated Material Ledger and Actual costing/ Actual cost component split in our implementation. The standard cost is based on delivery costs and there is no manufacturing involved. In order to test ML, we created some POs and did a GR and IR for those POs. When I look at the Material Price analysis on the Price Determination Structure View, I can see the Price differences per transaction (Goods receipt, Invoice receipt).
    But when I go to the Cost component View (Actual), I cannot drill down into the individual transactions. I am able to see the actual cost component split only at the summarized level across multiple transactions. I can see the category Purchase Order under Receipts, but I am unable to drill down to see the actual cost component split for the individual transactions (goods receipts, invoice receipts).  Did I miss anything on the configuration? The client wants to see the price differences per cost component per transaction and actual cost component split per transaction.
    Is it possible to view this information using standard configuration? Would I have to change the controlling level in order to achieve this?
    Can you please provide your advice?
    Thanks,
    Balram

    Hi Balram.
    If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
    As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
    If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
    Arturo.

  • Primary cost component split not happening

    Hello Experts,
    I am trying to create a Primary cost component split for Products with following settings
    1. Creation of Primary cost component structure "1N" and marking it as Primary cost component
    2. Assigning the Primary cost elements to the Cost component structure
    3. Assigning the Primary cost component structure for the Company code and Plant
    4. Assigning the Primary cost component structure to "Version" under "Price calculation" tab.
    5. Activity type with Activity type category "1- Manual entry, Manual allocation" and Price Indicator "1 - Plan price, automatically based on activity"
    6. Activity output planning for Cost center
    7. Primary cost planning for the Cost centers
    8. Activity price calculation. (Update run) - Prices are changed in KP26 also
    9. After all the above steps I checked report S_ALR_87013644, Plan price is existing in the report as mentioned in SAP note: 1658589
    After all the above steps, I tried running Cost estimate for a product. I am getting the error message
    Cost element 90001 is not assigned to a cost component
    Message no. CK239
    Also, I am getting a message
    No structure could be determined for internal activity TEB (M0001)
    Message no. CK694
    Therefore the Cost component is showing only the Material component.
    Where "90001" is a secondary cost element. I am not sure why system is still searching for Secondary cost element where we have assigned Primary cost component structure. I also ensured that Primary cost elements used in planning are all assigned to a Component in Cost component structure.
    I checked for SAP note "1736332", which is not applicable for my system version. Current version of SAP_APPL is  Release 606 and Support package SAPKH60607.
    Please help. Am I missing any settings.
    Thank you in advance.
    Muneer Ahamed N

    Hi Muneer,
    Please check whether you have maintained cost center splitting structure properly and assigned to the respective cost center for which you have maintained output planning and input planning.
    This splitting structure is much required because there only we maintain the relationship between primary cost elements and activities.
    Coming to your first message, yes system expects maintenance of secondary cost elements also in the cost component structure which is not primary CCS.
    Inorder to show primary cost component structure view:
    First, system calculates the direct activity cost in terms of secondary cost elements...
    Next, it verifies the cost center splitting structure you made,
    Then, system is going to convert the direct activity cost in terms of primary cost elements based on the splitting structure and Finally displays the primary cost component view
    I suppose second message speaking about cost center splitting structure only, please go through it carefully
    Other than these whatever the process you specified is right only..
    Regards...
    Jose

  • Cost component split transfer for Profit center valuation in ke27

    Dear All,
    We have activated multiple valuation/transfer prices. Material ledger is also activated.
    We want to transfer cost component split to CO-PA by ke27.
    We have defined separate costing keys for access to actual cost estimate for legal and profit center valuations.
    But cost component split transfer to COPA works only for legal valution. Even we have defined type of valution for profit center  costing key -transfer cost component split and total costs.
    What should be else customized to transfer cost components splitting in profit center valuation to CO-PA from actual cost estimates?
    With best regards,
    Kamila.

    Hi,
    I have assigned the same value fields used for legal valuation to column 2, which was pointed in message.
    But now I got following message in ke27:
    For actual data, value fields that were already populated before CO-PA valuation cannot be changed in valuation.
    1. As a rule, value fields that were filled before CO-PA valuation - be it from SD or by a manual entry of a line item - can only be changed by means of user exits.
    (Note that for plan data, CO-PA valuation always has priority over the values planned manually.)
    2. The valuation steps in a CO-PA valuation strategy are numbered sequentially. These numbers determine the order in which the steps are carried out within that strategy. As a rule, value fields populated in one step can be used as a basis for calculating values for other value fields in a subsequent step.
    Value fields that were populated in a previous step are generally not overwritten by subsequent steps.
    The exception to this are steps that use a CO-PA user exit. User exits let you change individual value fields.
    3. If you valuate using multiple material cost estimates simultaneously, this means that the values of different cost components within the same cost estimate are aggregated and then entered in one CO-PA value field. However, value fields that already contain data from a previous cost estimate are not overwritten by a later cost estimate. Consequently, you should assign value fields in Customizing so that the values of different cost estimates are entered in different sets of value fields.
    4. When condition values are transferred to CO-PA value fields, note that condition types that are assigned to the same value field are added together. This is also the case when the condition types come from different costing sheets within the valuation strategy.
    So does it mean we should define separate value fields for PC valuation?
    With best regards,
    Kamila.

  • Cost component split datasource

    Hi,
    We recently activated 0CO_PC_ACT_10 Cost Component Split datasource and bringing info into 0COPC_C07 cube for the costing analysis.
    Acccording to the requirement need to extact the cost of finished material and cost of semi finished material into BW. The relevent costs are avaialble in R/3 in T code CKM3N. The finished and semi finished materials are differenciated in R/3 with Prefix C. ex: If material is 10000 then semi finished material will be C10000.
    We modelling as per SAP standard and loaded, we are able to load cost of finished material with sales order but not able to load cost of semi finished material with sales order. (need to analyse cost of semi finished material with sales order in reporting)
    Any inputs on how to bring cost of semi finished material with sales order in BW cubes. Also we are thinking to write new extractor as this standard extractor is not meeting our requirement.
    I would like to know is anybody got similar requirement, or is anybody involved in enhancing this datasource for getting sales order with semi finished materials?
    Please let me know your thoughts. If you need any more info from my side let me know.
    Thanks
    Naveen

    Hi Rakesh , 
    The datasource 0CO_PC_ACT_10 uses the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA to extract its data .
    And in the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA,
    i could locate these tables - ckmlhd and  ckmlmv011 .
    So you can check these tables for your information .
    You can also have a look at this :
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/02/a2e338d96cd84fe10000000a11405a/frameset.htm]
    Thanks ,
    Lokesh

  • Error in CK11n - The system could not determine a cost component split for

    Hi All,
    When i run CK11n i have following error:
    The system could not determine a cost component split for the internal activity with activity type 502000 of cost center 10100.
    Procedure
    Check the master data for activity type 502000 of cost center 10100. It is possible that no activity price calculation has been carried out for the cost center.
    could any one give me solution
    Thanking you.

    Well, did you run activity price calculation for the relevant cost center(s)?
    The CCS you're using for product costing (either your COGM split, or the auxillary) has been marked as a "primary" cost component split.  It wants to break secondary costs down into their cost components, and assign those components to components in its own structure.
    Wihout a planned CCS for the activity, this isn't possible.  (This is normally calculated by KSPI during planning.)
    Either calculate an activity CCS is KSPI, assuming that all the prerequisites are in place for that, or uncheck the "primary cost component split" indicator in your costing variant configuration.

  • Reference to note 434873 - Auxiliary cost component split

    1) We use material ledger. We already have a primary cost component split defined in our system.
    2) We want to activate an auxiliary cost component split.
    3) We read the note 434873, paragraph 2)b) (activating an auxiliary cost component split).
    4) Who can assist us to develop the customer-specific Z program that is referenced in the note?

    Hi to Evrybody,
    I am trying to configure Primary Cost Component Split,, but I am confused what are the technical steps to configure such a structure 
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/7e/cb7e8643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    There are several requirements how to configure in SAP Primary Cost Component Split:
    1)You assign a cost component structure in the CO version in Cost Center and Process cost planning!  Which Cost Component Structure? The Primary Cost Component Structure or the Cost Component Structure?
    2)You determined the prices through planned price iteration!                                                                 We set this indicator in the CO Version itself?
    3)You define a Cost Component Structure for Primary Cost Component Split of Product Cost Planning! How do we define it, via simply checking the check in OKTZ?
    I want to understand when you create Cost Component Structure and Primary Cost Component Structure, which one of these 2 needs to be assigned in the CO version in Cost Center Accounting? And the other thing is I do not make the difference between Cost Component Structure and Auxiliary Cost Component Structure? Could you please shortly describe what is the difference? Other thing is when you create Primary Cost Component Structure and its components, DO THEY INCLUDE ONLY RANGE OF PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS OR IT IS A TECHNICAL STEP ONLY TO CHECK THAT CHECK IN OKTZ FOR Primary Cost Component Split. Let me know, thank you very much for your help and cooperation again!
    Best Regards,
    Georgi Georgiev

  • Need to de-activate Actual cost component split

    Hi All,
    I need to de-activate Actual cost component split in the test client.
    It has been activated by my testing associate by mistake.
    Please let me know the do and donts if anyone has done this de-activation before.
    I could not find any relevent OSS messages or consulting notes on this topic
    We are using ML Actual Costing and Multi Currency  - without actual cost component split.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Vik Sood

    Hi Balram.
    If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
    As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
    If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
    Arturo.

  • Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

    Hi,
    My issue is as follows.
    Production process spans across 2 company codes.
    Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
    Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
    Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
    We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
    However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
    Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
    I would be grateful for any ideas.
    Thanks,
    Szymon

    Hi Udo / Szymon.
    I have a question about this issue.
    In the sap help  about multiple valuations / group costing:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of  bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
    states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
    Could you clarify about this?
    thanks!!
    Arturo.
    Group Valuation
    Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
    When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
    For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
    To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
    Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
    In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
    You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
    The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
    To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

  • Cost Component Splitting in Joint Production

    Hello.
    I meet a trouble in the cost component splitting for the co-product.
    I tried to creat a BOM like :
                                 A                       B
                                  C (CCS1)           D(CCS2)
    the raw material C&D are in different cost component,and the manufacturing matertials are A&B.
    and I set the apportionment structure like A(CCS1 100%,CCS2 50%)   B(CCS1 0%, CCS2 50%)
    Then i run the CK11N,and the result is correct.
    But the problem is as following:
    when I creat a BOM like :
                                 A                       B
                                              E
                                  C (CCS1)          D(CCS2)
    the raw material C&D are in different cost component,and the semi-product matertial is E,then E is producted for finished product A&B.
    and I set the apportionment structure like A(CCS1 100%,CCS2 50%)   B(CCS1 0%, CCS2 50%)
    then i run the CK11N,and the result is wrong.
    whatever i set the apportionment structure,the result of the CCS is  A (CCS1 50%,CCS2 50%),B(CCS1 50%,CCS2 50%)
    anybody can tell me how i can get the correct result?
                                                                                    Roc
    Edited by: Roc Roc on Jan 4, 2010 11:42 AM

    Hi
    Make cost splitting structure and assigne to Production Cost Center.
    Run Cost splitting KSS2 for cost splitting according to activity types.
    bukhari

  • Material Ledger: Cost Component Split (Elements) table CKMLKEPH

    Hi All,
    Whats the use of this table, what information get updated in this table while creating invoice.
    Message was edited by:
            Alexander

    Hi Alexander,
    CKMLKEPH belongs to material ledgers actual cost component split database:
    Differences from Actual Costs to Standard Price
    Entries per material, update, cost element structure, kind of difference and level
    Created per any update where occur differences
    so if ML is active with actual CCS and your invoice has a price diference than CKMLKEPH will store the split of the price difference posting.
    it is related to CKMLKEV.
    this note gives some further links
    <a href="https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=398941&_NLANG=E">Note 398941 - INFORMATION: CO-PC-ACT (Data structures)</a>
    best regards,
                         Udo

  • Auxiliary cost component splitting issue in CK11N

    Hi Friends,
    We are using primary cost component split for the auxiliary cost component structure for getting more information.  We have a machine cost in the main cost component which is split in three auxiliary cost component i.e. Energy, Maintenance and depreciation. 
    My belief is that with the activation of primary cost component split the costs have to flow from cost center in its primary cost element form to this cost component structure.
    With the current data that we have, the cost component split is seen for all the three cost elements in the auxiliary cost component split u2013 But we are not able to trace the source of this amount as we do not have any splitting structure in place, the plan costs are only for Energy not for Maintenance and depreciation.
    OKES Configuration:
    Selection for assignment:
    Cost Element               GMACHINE (only for Energy)
    Activity Type     MACH
    Splitting rules:
    10                                        21     Equivalence Numbers Planning
    Machine 0.64 is splitting into as follows Depreciation 0.41, Energy 0.12 and Maintenance 0.11
    I am afraid from where splitting happening for Energy and depreciation and there is not receiving   splitting rules.
    Appreciate for quick reply
    Thanks
    Govind

    Hi to Evrybody,
    I am trying to configure Primary Cost Component Split,, but I am confused what are the technical steps to configure such a structure 
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/7e/cb7e8643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    There are several requirements how to configure in SAP Primary Cost Component Split:
    1)You assign a cost component structure in the CO version in Cost Center and Process cost planning!  Which Cost Component Structure? The Primary Cost Component Structure or the Cost Component Structure?
    2)You determined the prices through planned price iteration!                                                                 We set this indicator in the CO Version itself?
    3)You define a Cost Component Structure for Primary Cost Component Split of Product Cost Planning! How do we define it, via simply checking the check in OKTZ?
    I want to understand when you create Cost Component Structure and Primary Cost Component Structure, which one of these 2 needs to be assigned in the CO version in Cost Center Accounting? And the other thing is I do not make the difference between Cost Component Structure and Auxiliary Cost Component Structure? Could you please shortly describe what is the difference? Other thing is when you create Primary Cost Component Structure and its components, DO THEY INCLUDE ONLY RANGE OF PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS OR IT IS A TECHNICAL STEP ONLY TO CHECK THAT CHECK IN OKTZ FOR Primary Cost Component Split. Let me know, thank you very much for your help and cooperation again!
    Best Regards,
    Georgi Georgiev

  • S_ALR_87013644 - Cost Centers: Cost Component Split

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I am executing Cost splitting in KSII, and the values are coming correctly while doing the test run. However in the report S_ALR_87013644 - Cost Centers: Cost Component Split , price per unit is getting doubled. For example
    Cost center X actual costs 20000
    Activity unit for this cots center 2000 hrs
    After splitting the value per hr=10
    However in this report, per hr cost is coming as 20.
    Is this a standard way of calu
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Pls check the cost centers that you entered when executing the report.
    If there are more than 1 cost center was selected, the system will sum the activity price per unit of all selected cost centers then display..
    So the value maybe different from your expectation.
    Regards!
    Edited by: The Cuong Than on May 6, 2010 4:57 AM

  • Material Ledger : Cost component split different in CO PC and ML

    Hello SAP People,
    In ML cost component split I don't have the same split that in CK13N COPC.
    History
    We changed the cost component structure in OKTZ, because we wanted to split on two different cost component the cost of Copper :
    -     Copper
    -     Primes :Premium cost (transformation cost for producer) on copper.
    In CK11N the split is OK and we can read the new cost element corresponding to premium cost.
    To split the costing tool goes on the purchase info records to read condition type that are different for copper and premium.
    The problem we have is that when we run Material ledger we are not able to see after a good receipt a similar split in the cost component view.
    We already run MLCCS_RESET and MLCCS_Startup programs this month and created new Raw material after. But it seems the ML do not take care of this and all the actual cost (I stop to single level) are on the copper cost component and there is nothing on Premium cost component.
    We just run single level on ML for current month.
    Could you please help me to explain why we are not able to obtain the correct split between Copper and u201CPrimesu201D

    Hi Marco,
    yes, these both are independent from each other. You will have no issue when these are different.
    It is very typical that you want to report different kind of information for activities as for materials.
    A typical setup might be
    Activity                                   Material
    Asset depreciation                   Raw Material Cost
    Room cost                               Energy
    Labour                                     Production Cost
    labour overhead                      Production Overhead
    Electricity                                 Packaging
    When you use the activity for the production of a material (confirmation CO15) the assignment goes normally to a single cost component in the material, above for example into production cost. This is controlled by the cost element. Only when the primary cost component split is activated and a transfer structure betweeen both is maintained you could achieve
    Asset depeciation, Room Cost, Labour overhead  -> Production overhead
    Labour -> Production Cost
    Electricity -> Energy
    Best regards,  Udo

Maybe you are looking for