Active Data Guard License is technical or legal ?
Dear friends
I have seen in many documents , that the Active Data Guard needs additional license , but one of my friends said that he could implement Active Data Guard without any licenses ( he only downloaded the Enterprise edition of database 11g r2 ).
my question : is the active data guard license , a technical license or legal license ?
user8336252 wrote:
Dear friends
I have seen in many documents , that the Active Data Guard needs additional license , but one of my friends said that he could implement Active Data Guard without any licenses ( he only downloaded the Enterprise edition of database 11g r2 ).
my question : is the active data guard license , a technical license or legal license ?Wow, everyone seems to want to jump up and trumpet their superior licensing knowledge in Big Legal Voice tones instead of simply answering the poor guy's question.
If you have a server that has an Oracle EE database on it, you need to license it. It doesn't matter if only a standby database is on the server - DataGuard is just a feature like other features. One server with a primary + one server with the standby = 2 servers you need to pay licenses for.
Everyone else, relax, answer the question, and stop waving your Big Swinging Audit Team language. The original poster demonstrates how widely misunderstood Oracle licensing is among DBAs - which given how often it's changed, is not a surprise ;-)
Similar Messages
-
I have no idea where to ask this question and if I'm asking in the wrong forum I'd appreciate it if someone can direct me to the right one.
I have a physical standby server and I'd like add the Active Data Guard option to it to offload ETL processing. If I want to use named user plus licensing, how many named users to I need to pay for? There is only 1 server, 1 process, and 1 user that will be pulling data from this standby server into a SQL Server landing store database. Eventually the data will make it into a data warehouse (also SQL Server), SQL Server Reporting Services, and SQL Server Analysis Services. Between SSAS and SSRS there might be 100 distinct users on the front end, but they are all several levels removed from the standby server.
So the question is how many named users do I need to buy? The definition of "named user plus" in the licensing definitions is about as clear mud. I think I only need 1. But it could be 25 based on minimum # of users for EE. And it could be 100 if every user of SSRS and SSAS is counted individually.
I'm trying to avoid doing processor based licensing which is equally unclear but on initial impression seems to be much more expensive. The standby server in question has 2 dual core intel xeon processors, running on Windows 2008 R2. The version of Oracle is 11GR2 Enterprise Edition. If I've done the math right, processor licensing comes out to 23k.Hello;
Active Data Guard does need a license and you are in the correct forum. But only your Oracle salesperson can answer this question.
Was at Cloud Control class last month and several DBA's there thought everyone has a similar license agreement. Not true. So somebody here might guess at your answer, but in the end only Oracle's answer will count.
Best Regards
mseberg -
Oracle 11g Active Data Guard是怎么收费的?
原来在Oracle 10g中，DG是免费使用的，想请问一下，在Oracle 11g中，性能得到加强的ADG是怎么收费的？谢谢
FYI
Use customary EE Option License Practices
Active Data Guard license required if using either Real-time Query or RMAN block-change tracking on a standby
Example with primary and 5 separate standby databases
S1 = physical - real-time query
S2 = physical - real-time query + RMAN block change tracking
S3 = physical - RMAN block change tracking
S4 = physical - neither real-time query nor RMAN block change tracking
S5 = logical
Active Data Guard must be licensed for primary and for S1, S2 and S3.
Active Data Guard is not relevant to logical standby -
hi,
I want to setup Active Data Guard Oracle 11gr2. This is my first time. Is there any good guide or cookbook for setting up active data guard 11g. I want to setup on linux. I'll be thankful.
thanxThere's not so much to configure, it's only a sequence of statements:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e22491/manage_ps.htm#sthref597
More important - not technical - point is you need an extra licence.
In fact Real-Time Query means Active DataGuard.
Edited by: oradba on 05.10.2011 11:49 -
Need suggestion on Active data guard or Logical Stand by
Hi All,
Need a suggestion of on below scenario.
We have a production database ( oracle version 11g R2 ) and planning to have a Logical standby or physical standy (Active data guard). Our usage of the standby database is below.
1) Planning to run online reports (100+) 24x7. So might create additional indexes,materialized views etc.
2) daily data feed ( around 300+ data files ) to data warehouse. daily night, jobs will be scheduled to extract data and send to warehouse. Might need additional tables for jobs usage.
Please suggest which one is good.
Regards,
vara.Hello,
In active dataguad Whig is feature from 11gRx ,
If you choose active dataguard, you have couple of good options, one is you can make a high availability of your production database, which can act as image copy of production, as you are asking in 11g you have more advantage where you can open in read only mode and at the sometime MRP will be active, so you can redirect users to connect standby to perform select operations for reporting purpose. So that you can control much load on production ,
Even uou can perform switchover in case of role change, perform failover if your primary is completely lost. Also you can convert to physical to logical standby databases & you can configure FSFO
You have plenty of options with active dataguard.
Refer http://www.orafaq.com/node/957
consider closing the thread if answered and keep the forum clean.
>
User Profile for user11261773
user11261773
Handle: user11261773
Status Level: Newbie
Registered: Jul 14, 2011
Total Posts: 12
Total Questions: 6 (5 unresolved)
>
Edited by: CKPT on Mar 18, 2012 8:14 PM -
What are the pros and cons using Active Data Guard vs Data Guard?
My understanding is that Active Data Guard is an additional database option for Oracle 11gR2 Enterprise Edition. I need to know the pros and cons using Active Data Guard vs Data Guard in order to decide whether to get pay extra for the Active Data Guard.
Thanks for any help.Hemant K Chitale wrote:
Before jumping in to Active Data Guard, one needs to evaluate :
a. Is there really a need to run queries on the Standby ? The Standby could / should be at a remote site so queries are "across the network". Depending on the nature of the queries and the volume of output, the "performance" of the queries may not seem to be the same.
b. If the database is not in Maximum Protection mode, the data "seen" at the standby may not be in "real-time" synch
c. Not all applications are truely read-only when querying. Some applications use "jobs" that write to tables when querying. Such would not work with Active DataGuard. (example : EBusiness Suite). There are very complicated ways of handling this -- and one needs to consider if the complications can be introduced and supported.
Over the network accessing standby read only is really not an good idea, I think no one will compare performance with primary and standby,
But some of them they want to validate data which are very critical, as it is matching with primary or not, Its an added advantage with ACTIVE DATAGUARD
Prior to that until unless stop MRP, open database and then we need to validate, So there is an interruption of recovery, I can say its also an advantage where there is no interruption of recovery. -
Urgent : ORA-01426: numeric overflow on oracle 11g Active Data Guard
Hi
I have configured Active Data Guard on oracle 11g, for reporting purpose we will select mutliple querry on target side(10 users). we are getting 'numeric overflow erro'r on alert log file When we issuing multiple query on target side. PLeae let me know is this error will cause performance degrad. if it will degrade performance mean please tell me how to resolve this problem. Why the numeric overflow is comming . and it is not comming in the primary database, it is comming in standby database only. please any one help it is very urgent
is there any parameter To overcome this problme
Please please it is very important to me and very urgent .
Thanks
nafees
Edited by: Nafees on Jan 1, 2009 3:44 AM
Edited by: Nafees on Jan 1, 2009 3:54 AMThere is no one drowning.
Your house is not on fire.
The volcano has not exploded.
Please apologize for abusing this forum by claiming your issue is more urgent than other people's requests.
Then, and only then, should anyone help you. I know I certainly won't until I read your sincere apology and promise not to be abusive in the future. -
Oracle11g R2 Active Data guard using ASM Problem?
I have configured oracle11g r2 RAC on 2 notes using ASM Grid ( OS unix).
RAC is up and running.
Now I am configuring Active data Guard.
Under grid user instance +ASM and listener is running.
Under oracle user static listener is running.
All disk is mounted.
Oracle RAC and Data Guard directory and structure I have keeped same.
Now my problem is below:
$ ./rman target sys/HPinvent123nbl@dcpdb AUXILIARY sys/HPinvent123nbl@drpdb
Recovery Manager: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed Jan 16 16:28:32 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
connected to target database: DCPDB (DBID=316773134)
connected to auxiliary database: DRPDB (not mounted)
RMAN> duplicate target database for standby from active database;
Starting Duplicate Db at 16-JAN-13
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
allocated channel: ORA_AUX_DISK_1
channel ORA_AUX_DISK_1: SID=5644 device type=DISK
contents of Memory Script:
backup as copy reuse
targetfile '/u02/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/dbs/orapwdcpdb1' auxiliary format
'/u02/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/dbs/orapwdrpdb' ;
executing Memory Script
Starting backup at 16-JAN-13
allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: SID=1897 instance=dcpdb1 device type=DISK
Finished backup at 16-JAN-13
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of Duplicate Db command at 01/16/2013 16:28:48
RMAN-06136: ORACLE error from auxiliary database: ORA-00200: control file could not be created
ORA-00202: control file: '+data'
ORA-17502: ksfdcre:4 Failed to create file +data
ORA-15001: diskgroup "DATA" does not exist or is not mounted
ORA-15055: unable to connect to ASM instance
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
RMAN>
Please help.\
Thanks
Solaimanroot@drpdb1 []# id oracle
uid=108(oracle) gid=700(oinstall) groups=701(dba)
root@drpdb1 []# id grid
uid=109(grid) gid=700(oinstall) groups=701(dba),702(asmdba)
Edited by: 876149 on Jan 16, 2013 3:19 AM -
DB link problem between active Data Guard and report application database
My database version in 11.2.0.2.0 and OS is Oracle Solaris 10 9/10.
I am facing a problem in my Active data guard Database for reporting purpose. Active Data guard information is as below.
SQL> select name, database_role, open_mode from v$database;
NAME DATABASE_ROLE OPEN_MODE
ORCL PHYSICAL STANDBY READ ONLY WITH APPLY
Problem detail is below
I have created a db link (Name: DATADB_LINK) between active data guard and report application database for reporting purpose.
SQL> create database link DATADB_LINK connect to HR identified by hr using 'DRFUNPD';
Database link created.
But when I run a query using db link from my report application database I got this below error.
ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 10 with name "_SYSSMU10_4261549777$" too small
ORA-02063: preceding line from DATADB_LINK
Then I check Active Data Guard database alart log file and get below error
ORA-01555 caused by SQL statement below (SQL ID: 11yj3pucjguc8, Query Duration=1 sec, SCN: 0x0000.07c708c3):SELECT "A2"."BUSINESS_TRANSACTION_REFERENCE","A2"."BUSINESS_TRANSACTION_CODE",MAX(CASE "A1"."TRANS_DATA_KEY" WHEN 'feature' THEN "A1"."TRANS_DATA_VALUE" END ),MAX(CASE "A1"."TRANS_DATA_KEY" WHEN 'otherFeature' THEN "A1"."TRANS_DATA_VALUE" END )
But the interesting point if I run the report query directly in Active Data Guard database, I never got error.
So is it a problem of DB link between active Data Guard and other database?Fazlul Kabir Mahfuz wrote:
My database version in 11.2.0.2.0 and OS is Oracle Solaris 10 9/10.
I am facing a problem in my Active data guard Database for reporting purpose. Active Data guard information is as below.
SQL> select name, database_role, open_mode from v$database;
NAME DATABASE_ROLE OPEN_MODE
ORCL PHYSICAL STANDBY READ ONLY WITH APPLY
Problem detail is below
I have created a db link (Name: DATADB_LINK) between active data guard and report application database for reporting purpose.
SQL> create database link DATADB_LINK connect to HR identified by hr using 'DRFUNPD';
Database link created.
But when I run a query using db link from my report application database I got this below error.
ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 10 with name "_SYSSMU10_4261549777$" too small
ORA-02063: preceding line from DATADB_LINK
Then I check Active Data Guard database alart log file and get below error
ORA-01555 caused by SQL statement below (SQL ID: 11yj3pucjguc8, Query Duration=1 sec, SCN: 0x0000.07c708c3):SELECT "A2"."BUSINESS_TRANSACTION_REFERENCE","A2"."BUSINESS_TRANSACTION_CODE",MAX(CASE "A1"."TRANS_DATA_KEY" WHEN 'feature' THEN "A1"."TRANS_DATA_VALUE" END ),MAX(CASE "A1"."TRANS_DATA_KEY" WHEN 'otherFeature' THEN "A1"."TRANS_DATA_VALUE" END )
But the interesting point if I run the report query directly in Active Data Guard database, I never got error.
So is it a problem of DB link between active Data Guard and other database?
Check this note which is applicable for your environment
*ORA-01555 on Active Data Guard Standby Database [ID 1273808.1]*
also
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:8908307196113 -
Looking for Active Data Guard in Oracle 11g Release 2 References
I want to reach out to customers who have implemented Active Data Guard in production (preferably 11.2), so that we can develop some
customer references that in turn will benefit other customers. The customers who get selected for such references may further be selected to publish their case study directly in oracle.com and/or invited as a customer co-speaker in the upcoming Oracle OpenWorld at San Francisco (Sep 19-23, 2010). Being a customer co-speaker at OOW means they get a free pass to the full conference (regular price for that is $1795-$2495).
Please send any follow-ups to [email protected]
Thank you.
Larry M. Carpenter
Oracle Data Guard & MAA Product ManagerHi Larry,
This is Bhavik Desai Oracle -DBA@Amazon. I do have couple of Active Standby running on 11gR2 On RHEL 5 64-Bit platform.
Most of the databases are reporting on (DSS Having 2-4 TB in size) having FSFO configured.
It would be a pleasure if i can provide any benchmarking to you on this.
Regards,
Bhavik Desai -
Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3
Hi All,
I have a query regarding Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3.
Does the Oracle 11g R1/R2 Active Data guard feature supported with SAP R3?
I appreciate your help to provide any link or document for the same.
Thanks,
VihangI have a query regarding Oracle 11g Active Data Guard and SAP R3.
Does the Oracle 11g R1/R2 Active Data guard feature supported with SAP R3?
I appreciate your help to provide any link or document for the same.
Oracle database 11g functionality certified by SAP, check below link
http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/sap/oradb11g-article-upd-1-323074.pdf
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/osb-11gr1certmatrix.xls -
Oracle 11g Active Data Guard help ?
Hi Friends,
I successfully setup an Active data guard environment(11g). But, I dont know when the PROD database is highly utilize , its read only tasks like reporting and backup are doing in STANDBY. How can I know which db (prod or stand by) is used for these readonly operations ?
Regards
VishIt is not so simple to direct reports to the Physical Standby as you seem to assume.
You need to do some work for the setup.
See here for a description:
http://uhesse.com/downloads/real-time-query-presentation/
Kind regards
Uwe Hesse
Don't believe it, test it!"
http://uhesse.com -
RMAN in active data guard with real time apply ON without a catalog DB
I would like to know whether I can take RMAN backups (both level 0 & incremental) in active data guard with real time apply ON without a catalog database. version is 11.2.0.3.2. Will it make difference in the control file of standby syncing with primary? Can I use these backups on primary to restore and recover the database(including control file backup)?
Thank you very much msberg. Could you please answer the below queries as well?
Should I cancel Real Time Apply before starting RMAN?
Will it make difference in the control file of standby syncing with primary? Is it possible to use these backups on primary to restore and recover the database(including control file backup)? If possible, how will I do that? -
How to configure Enterprise Manager in Active Data Guard?
Hi,
I have installed oracle 11g r2 rac with asm in two nodes. OS is hp-Unix.
I have installed oracle11g Active Data Guard using Single alone Database.
Both RAc and Active Data Guard works fine.
I have not configure Data Guard Broker.
Question: How to configure Enterprise Manager in Active Data Guard?
Thanks
Solaimanhttp://www.gokhanatil.com/2012/04/manage-your-existing-data-guards-with.html
-
Goldengate from physical standby with Active data guard or from logical standby - which is better?
Hi,
We have Oracle 11.2.0.4 and are currently using Active Data Guard on a physical standby. My boss wants me to use Goldengate
to replicate several schema from Oracle to SqlSserver. She doesn't want to touch the Primary, which is in production. Would it be better
to setup a Logical standby for Goldendate to use, in addition to the Physical standby? Or will it be sufficient to use the Physical standby?
The application tables don't all have primary keys. I'm trying to decide if the Logical standby adds another layer of complexity or would
introduce delays in getting the data from Oracle to Sqlserver.
Thanks in advance,Hi,
In this case I recommend you to use physical standby + Golden gate with ALO mode. You might have sligthly more trouble in logical standby. it means you might have more trouble at Goldengate's extract side.
You said
The application tables don't all have primary keys.
so you have to add keycols on replicat side.
I recommend you to add an index which should consist of keycols columns. it will be necessary for replicat performance.
Best Regards
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hello All, Is there any way to findout in MM to check out on particular date which stock entries are posted into a which gl account. Helpful answers will be rewarded. Thanks, Vibha
-
Adobe Premiere elements 10 has lost HDV camera in device manager..help
Our Sony V1E camera was recognised in Adobe Premiere Elements and we could capture footage fine.. suddenly the device manager can't see the camera..but ..strangely..it can play and rewind the camera etc etc.. just cannot capture?? waht has gone wrong
-
Help with Photoshop Premiere Elements 13 not loading
I have asked this question now three times with no answer. The troubleshooting website goes round in circles so there is only a forum to get help? I am so frustrated with the whole thing and if I dont get this osrted then I have no option but to send
-
How to call javascript function in back bean of jsf
hi, i am trying to call java script function in back bean but not done. Is there any code for call javascript function in bean file.
-
Tracks for WD par files and VC applications
Hello Gurus, Could anybody please throw some light on the tracks for Webdynpro par files and visual composer applications? I need to know if we need separate tracks for Webdynpro par files and Visual composer applications on the NWDI. Can we use o