Active user report has different responsibility start date than inquiry for

hi,
I have a user for whom I see a different responsibliy start date in user inquiry form than what I see in Active user report for the same user.
Any idea why it is this way?
This tells me that inquiry forma and active users are pulling responsiblity start date from different place.
Please help this is a big problame for audit.

Hi,
Please mention the application release.
Have you verified the value from the application (Security > User > Define)?
If possible, please post the query you use to get the start date.
Regards,
Hussein

Similar Messages

  • Report of  GR no,GR date,qty,Vendor for a list of PO

    Dear all
          Kindly let me know the T.code to get report of GR no,GR date,qty,Vendor for a list of PO
    regards
    M.Chandra mohan

    Hi chandra
    i agree with karthik
    U can get field <b>Purchase order in MB51</b> but u need to do configuration for this
    goto Spro>Materials Management>Inventory Management and Physical Inventory>Reporting>Define Field Selection for Material Document List-->here select <b>Purchase order number</b> (prog. name RM07DOCS table MSEG field EBELN then tick selection field
    Now u can view purchase order number in MB51
    Vishal...

  • Crystal Report XI R2 Validate Start Date - End Date

    Hi All,
    I want to validate that Start Date is not greater than End Date.
    Thanks,
    Rick

    Hello Raghavendra,
    It's good to setup one parameter if take Range method.
    But when we use any parament as range, then the parameter value can't be displayed in the report? (Blank)
    Wonder if you can solve the printout of parameter value problem, then it's wonderful to use this kind of parameter, .... because the parameter input window will get shorten than the from-to parameters
    Best regards,
    Michelle

  • Active users report shows  REP-0004: Warning

    Hi,
    Active users request logfile showing
    Enter Password:
    REP-0004: Warning: Unable to open user preference file.
    How to solve this wraning?And actually what it means
    Regards

    Hi,
    Have a look at the following documents and see if it helps.
    Note: 742122.1 - Reports Fail With REP-0004 REP-3000 REP-0069 REP-57054 On a Cloned R12 (12.0.4) Instance
    https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=742122.1
    Note: 210795.1 - Troubleshooting Guide for REP-4 error
    https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=210795.1
    Regards,
    Hussein

  • Dateofbirth and start date not same for infotype 2

    Hi Gurus,
    Recently we have applied supportpacks for 4.6c  in development.I am testing for hiring action.What i observed is end date for these infotypes changed to 31.12.1999 instead of 12.31.1999 and in infotype 2 employee dateofbirth  and start date is not same which is suppose to be same.Startdate of infotype 2 is taken as employee hire date.Infotype 2 has timeconstraint 1.when i am trying to enter  date of birth, for some dates it give me an error invalid date. what could be the cause?Help is appreciated
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Please go to SU3 and check for the Date Format under the Defaults tab.
    Hope this helps,
    Reward points if helpful,
    Thank You,

  • Attempting to run Service report with different parameters- No data

    User wants to run a report to display all of the Service Calls(different parameters have been entered to test) and no data is brought back. There is an error in the status bar Message 131-85 No data. But if another user runs the same report there is data.
    Have checked Authorisations and all is OK.

    I worked through this issue and found that one of the parameters had a blank selection but this incorrect. Once we changed the selection that data came through.

  • Report in Crystal reports has different values in Infoview

    I have uploaded a Crystal Report into BO Enterprise using the CMC.
    The logging into the Infoview to view the report and the results are different to those in the report when run against the same data in Crystal reports.
    It is pulling up data, but not the correct figures. I dont know where it is getting its data from.
    Any help would be appreciated.

    I deleted the ODBC connection and recreated it with a new name.
    I then relinked the report in crystal reports, and it suddenly decided to give updated values.
    Thanks

  • Firefox4 has different response to mouse middle button set to "close"

    Firefox3 and IEx respond to the "close" setting on Microsoft mouse middle button by closing the tab. Firefox4 responds by closing all tabs. Is this an intended change of behaviour?

    No.
    http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

  • 11g Report behaves differently in Application Menu than Report Builder !

    Hi,
    I m working in 11g Reports and noted some objects, which shows different/no results when run from my application menu (through Web.Show_document & Run_Report_object), but these objects are OK when run in Report Builder (paper layout).
    (1)
    When I run report from my application menu, Formula Column shows no result i.e. 0 ,
    but when same run from Report Builder (Paper Layout), formula column shows the right result.
    Below is my Formula Column;
    function RATEFormula return Number is
    rt NUMBER(10,4);
    Mt VARCHAR2(8);
    begin
         Mt :=TO_CHAR(:FROMDATE,'RRRRMM');
    if :RATETYPE='A' THEN
         LOOP
         SELECT (sum(nvl(amount,0))) / (sum(nvl(rect_qty,0)))
         INTO Rt
         FROM trhrect h,trdrect d
         WHERE TO_CHAR(h.v_dt,'RRRRMM')=Mt
         AND d.item_code=:ITEM_CODE
         AND h.unit=d.unit AND h.v_ser=d.v_ser AND h.v_no=d.v_no ;
    EXIT WHEN RT >0 OR MT='201003';
         MT:=TO_CHAR(TO_NUMBER(MT)-1);
         END LOOP;
         end if;
    RETURN NVL(Rt,0);
    end;
    (2)
    Vertical Lines i.e. these lines are visible when run through Paper Layout in Report Builder, but these lines are not visible when run through my application menu.
    Kindly advise me, its urgent.
    Thanks/Regards
    Dev.

    1> Please check whether the same parameters are being passed to the reports(while running the report using the report builder and through the application). Apart from this there will be no issue.
    2> Please check for any format triggers on the lines.

  • Scheduling Start Date in Past for PurchReq settings

    Experts,
    for work orders the range of how many days I allow the system to schedule in past is located in OPU3 and OPU5, Section: Scheduling Control for Detailed scheduling; Field Start in Past.
    Where are these settings for purchase requisitions located ?
    Thanks in advance
    Jörg

    HI
    Go to T code OPPQ Maintain plant parameter > select your plant then > Start in Past> select  check box for start in past also chekc as suggested by Mr Mangalraj In T code OMIT.
    Setting form OPPQ will overwrite in OMIT.
    Check at your end.
    Regards
    Anupam Sharma

  • 'Latest Start Date' & 'Effective Start Date' are displayed as different

    Issue Background:
    I have told following steps to follow while creating an employee to my end users.
    Case: An employee record has to be entered on 02-05-2012 who joined on 01-01-2010.
    Steps to be followed:
    - Enter the basic details of the employee (on 'People' form) / Left the 'Effective Start Date' and 'Latest Start Date' as default date i.e. 02-05-2012
    - Ctrl + S
    - Click on 'Assignment' button
    - Enter Basic Assignment information (The effective date on Assignment form is being displayed as '02-05-2012')
    - Ctrl + S / Close the assignment form
    - Change the 'Latest Start Date' = 01-01-2010
    - Ctrl + S / Some warnings appear and then the record is saved.
    My end user created at least 100 employees following the same procedure.
    Issue:
    With at least 5 employees there is a case that when I query those employees I am able to see a different Effective Start Date (i.e. 01-01-2010) and Latest Start Date (i.e. 02-05-2012). And when I open the assignment form the effective date displayed there is '02-05-2012' as well. ....Means some how in these records the assignment is created for these employees starting from 02-05-2012..rather than 01-01-2010.
    When I try to change the Latest Start Date to 01-01-2010 then system shows me this error --> '_APP-PAY-06841: Person changes exist between the old date and new date._'
    I don't know EITHER how this case was produced while entering the date OR what is the solution of this problem.
    Can any body help in this regard?

    Thanks for your response Avinash.
    Btw, I have viewed all these notes 368289.1, 603233.1, 399056.1, 329692.1, 1146414.1 already, but these don't seem to solve my problem because in each of these are under assumption that the initial Joining Date of the employee (i.e. Effective Start Date and Latest Start Date) is entered correctly without an issue, and these notes talk about dealing with 'Updating or Correcting' the data.
    But In my case the pre-conditions are different, although those are making the system to respond in the same way (i.e. showing same error) some how.
    As far as deleting the employees is concerned, yes that could be one option, but I am not really sure about adapting this solution as the dates I used in my case were just example dates, and in actual these employees are created almost 1 month back and they are already used in Projects module, CRM module and others.

  • Calculate depreciation start date based on user defined field in asset

    Hi,
    I have a specific scenario where the start of depreciation date for asset needs to be calculated on user-specific logic.There is a additional field "installation date" in asset master screens.The requirement is that for depreciation areas 10 and 11 user wants that the depreciation start date to be calculated on the installation date rather than capitalization date.
    I tried using the exit AMAV0001 where we can change the asset value date which determines the depreciation date at the time of first acquistion to asset.But the problem is we can't change it as per depreciation area wise and thats why posting error was coming.
    Please suggest if any idea on this.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Adriano,
    in your example 2 issues influence the described behaviour:
    1) In your example the revaluation occurs in the capitalization year, in which all acquisitions (and revaluations) are managed under the period for the first acquisition. Only as of the year following the capitalization year the period control "pro rata" would really consider the revaluation or another acquistion as of period 4. In case you want the period control also being considered according to the posting period in the capitalization year, set the indicator XBZDAT with the correction report from note  92925.
    That should solve your issue.
    2) In case you use the new depreciation calculation engine you have the possibility to use individual period controls for revaluation also. This means you could specify period control for acquisitions as "pro rata" and for revaluations "next month". To realize this create a new transaction type for revalutions as described in note 1138166 . Unfortunately this feature is not possible with the old depreciation calculation engine.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Automatic changing of activity start date and time of planned orders in SAP

    Hello experts,
    I have a requirement that in the transaction /SAPAPO/SEQ1 for the list of planned orders what ever we get in the sap we have to swap the activity start date and time for two planned orders which we select automatically. For this I have found the BADI "/SAPAPO/SEQ_VISUAL01".
    Now i am able to identify the two selected planned orders inside the BADI method SEQGRID_TOOLBAR_OKCODE_HANDLE.
    Now my requirement is i have to swap the start date and time for these two planned orders automatically i.e. through BAPI or any FM.
    Any idea of any BAPI or FM to change the details of the planned order.
    Thanks,
    Sanath.

    Hi Sanath,
    Please check this BAPI BAPI_MOSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI3.  This Bapi has the provision of chaning Planned Order & Production Order Data. Also, you can explore more info on available bapis in the T-code 'BAPI'.
    Thank you,
    Santosh KB.

  • Filters on CSWP not working when Scheduling Start Date sets Immediate Value

    In Sharepoint 2013, When users sets value of "Scheduling start date" to "Immediately", the filters does not work correctly.
    I have checked many forums where it is mentioned that If you set scheduling Start date to Immediately, internally the Scheduling Start Date is set to 01/01/1900.
    When i use query in content search webpart as publishing date is between "Scheduling Start Date" and "Scheduling End Date" so it fails. it  does not displays filtered data.
    Please provide some resolution for this issue.
    I have tried using calculated field wherein we can put formula to get value for Immediate value and then use it in Filter expression. but I need another approach related to "Scheduling Start Date" Column. i.e can we remove the Immediate radio button
    or can we restrict user to use specific date only?
    Thanks in Advance.

    This is a new one on me.
    It's a server program to interface with QuickTime and some other problematic services.
    If you use video or 3D in Photoshop Extended, you probably need it.
    Sounds like you are correct in that it has to do wtih Quicktime.  Do you have PS extended?

  • Required Start date in Notification

    Hi All,
    Maint order is assigned as a call object for a maint plan. After scheduling the maint order is generated with the basic date as per the planned date in maint plan. But the notification generated along with the order has the required start date same as that of the notification generated date (due to call horizon) instead of the planned date in maint plan. Kindly give me the config steps to set the notification reqd start date as per the planned date in maint plan.

    Hi Pushpa,
    Thx.,
    I had done that.
    But i'm getting it right only when the priority in maint plan is not selected.
    If priority is selected then i'm getting it wrong...
    Kindly revert back !
    Prabhu

Maybe you are looking for